Arsenic Toxicity-rICE

Available online at www.worldscientificnews.
com
WSN 10 (2015) 111-139
EISSN 2392-2192
Environmental, economic and health perspectives

of arsenic toxicity in Bengal Delta
Sayan Bhattacharya1,2,*, Uday Chand Ghosh2

1
Department of Environmental Studies, Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, India
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Presidency University, Kolkata, India
*E-mail address: sayan.evs@gmail.com , sayan_evs@yahoo.co.in
ABSTRACT
Arsenic is a metalloid of great environmental concern because of its highly toxic nature and
wide abundance. Arsenic contamination in groundwater has been reported in Bangladesh, India,
China, Taiwan, Vietnam, USA, Argentina, Chile and Mexico. The clinical symptoms of arsenic
toxicity in human body include skin itching to sun rays, burning and watering of the eyes, weight loss,
loss of appetite, weakness, fatigue, limited physical activities and working capacities, chronic
respiratory problems, moderate to severe anemia etc. The Bengal basin is regarded to be the most
acutely arsenic infested geological province in the world. Heavy withdrawal of groundwater for
fulfilling the needs of the increasing population in Bengal Basin resulted in increased arsenic level in
the groundwater. Mobilization of arsenic in Bengal delta is further interfered by microbial activities
and interactions. Different microbial strains have been isolated from Bengal Delta which can tolerate,
transform and resist arsenic. The use of arsenic contaminated groundwater for irrigation purpose in
crop fields elevates arsenic concentration in surface soil and in the plants grown in these areas. Several
plant species have been studied for their ability to accumulate arsenic in the Bengal Delta. Rice is
generally grown in submerged flooded condition, where arsenic bioavailability is high in soil. As
arsenic species are very much toxic to plants and can execute oxidative stresses, they can also affect
the overall production of rice and other vegetables, and can affect the agricultural and economic
development of Bengal Basin. Cattle population also consume arsenic infested water in those areas
and usually eat edible plants contaminated with arsenic, which, in turn, can further increase the
toxicity level in their bodies and also can increase the arsenic bioaccumulation in meat and milk. In the
World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139
rural areas of the Bengal Delta, arsenic contamination raised a number of social problems which are
continuously weakening the structural integrity of rural society. Uses of phytoremediation and
microbial remediation technologies, rainwater harvesting, use of arsenic resistant plant varieties for
cultivation are some sustainable methods which can be applied for arsenic remediation. Besides, nanoagglomerates of mixed oxides have been synthesized and successfully employed for arsenic removal
from aqueous solutions. Intensive investigation on a complete food chain is urgently needed in the
arsenic contaminated zones, which should be our priority in future researches.
Keywords: Arsenic; Bengal Delta; Toxicity; Bioaccumulation Groundwater; Phytoremediation
1. INTRODUCTION
Arsenic (As) is a metalloid (atomic no. 33) of great environmental concern because of
its highly toxic nature and colossal abundance. Since hundreds of years, people have worked
and lived with this dangerous element, many people have died of its toxicity and even more
have been sickened by it. Today, arsenic still remains a part of our daily lives and millions of
people are being chronically exposed to elevated doses of arsenic through their food, air,
water, and soils with unknown long-term health consequences (Mondal and Suzuki, 2002).
Since its isolation in 1250 A.D. by Albertus Magnus, this element has been a center of
controversy in human history. Its therapeutic use started from about 400 B.C. and many
reports on arsenic are documented by Hippocrates, Aristotle, Dioscorides and Pliny the Elder
(Gontijo and Bittencourt, 2005). Since then, arsenic has been the object of many studies and
imaginary legends and traditions.
Arsenic ranks 20th in abundance in the earths crust, 14th in the seawater and 12th in the
human body (Mondal and Suzuki, 2002). Arsenic naturally occurs in over 200 different
mineral forms, of which around 60% are arsenates, 20% are sulfides and sulfosalts and the
rest 20% are arsenides, arsenites, oxides, silicates and elemental arsenic (Bissen and Frimmel,
2003). Major arsenic containing primary minerals are arsenopyrite (FeAsS), realgar (As4S4),
and orpiment (As2S3). Realgar (As4S4) and orpiment (As2S3) are the two common reduced
forms of arsenic whereas the oxidized form is the mineral arsenolite (As2O3). Other naturally
occurring arsenic bearing minerals include loellingite (FeAs2), safforlite (CoAs), niccolite
(NiAs), rammelsbergite (NiAs2), arsenopyrite (FeAsS), cobaltite (CoAsS), enargite
(Cu3AsS4), gerdsorfite (NiAsS), glaucodot ((Co,Fe)AsS), and elemental arsenic (Greenwood
and Earnshaw, 1989).
Exposure to sufficiently high concentrations of inorganic arsenic in natural environment
has proved to be harmful to the organisms. The main pathways of arsenic exposure to the
human beings include ingestion of drinking water and consumption of foods and, to a lesser
extent, inhalation of air. In addition to the natural occurrence, herbicides, insecticides,
desiccants, feed additives, wood preservatives, chemical warfare agent, constituents of
organic and inorganic pigments and drugs are significant sources of arsenic (Bissen and
Frimmel, 2003). The geological contamination is till date the most alarming source of arsenic
in many countries. Arsenic contamination in groundwater has been reported in Bangladesh,
India, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, USA, Argentina, Chile and Mexico (Figure 1). In many of
these places the concentration has exceeded the permissible limit of 50 ppb recommended by
WHO (WHO, 2001).
-112-
2. ARSENIC TOXICITY IN HUMAN BODY

The first observation on the possible carcinogenic action of arsenic was reported in
1822, when Paris detected that cattle grazing close to foundries developed cutaneous
neoplasms in the hips and attributed the cause of these tumors to arsenic-containing expelled
gases (cited in Gontijo and Bittencourt, 2005). There is a long list of internal malignant
neoplasms related to arsenic toxicity, comprising tumors in the digestive, genital and urinary
tracts, lungs and upper respiratory tracts (Gontijo and Bittencourt, 2005). The most
characteristic manifestations are palmar and plantar keratoses, which are usually multiple,
symmetric and punctiform, preferably located lateral aspects of palms, base and sides of
fingers, soles, heels and toes (Gontijo and Bittencourt, 2005). Arsenic is a protoplasmatic
poison that exerts its toxicity by inactivating approximately 200 enzymes, especially those
involved in the production of cell energy and those related to DNA synthesis and repair
(Ratnaike, 2003). Recent studies have been able to detect chromosomal aberrations and sister
chromatid exchange in individuals exposed to arsenic and also highlight the action of reactive
oxygen species produced by arsenic compounds in inducing skin tumors (Mahata et al., 2003;
Matsui et al., 1999).
Arsenic is mainly excreted via urine and feces, although there are some minor routes of
excretion (e.g. in sweat) (WHO, 2001). Since arsenic can accumulate in keratin-containing
tissues (Benko et al., 1971), skin, hair and nails can also be considered as potentially minor
excretory routes. Several studies indicate that arsenic can also be excreted in human milk,
although the levels are low (Grandjean et al., 1995; Concha et al., 1998). Normally inorganic
arsenic is very quickly cleared from human blood. For this reason blood arsenic is used only
as an indicator of very recent and/or relatively high level exposure (e.g. in poisoning cases) or
in cases of chronic stable exposure (i.e. from drinking water) (Ellenhorn, 1997). Studies show
that in general blood arsenic does not correlate well with arsenic exposure in drinking water,
particularly at low levels (Bissen and Frimmel, 2003).
The chemical forms and oxidation states of arsenic are more important as regards to
toxicity. Toxicity also depends on other factors such as physical state, gas, solution, or
powder particle size, the rate of absorption into cells, the rate of elimination, the nature of
chemical substituents in the toxic compound, and, of course, the pre-existing state of the
patient. While it is generally accepted that methylation is the principal detoxification pathway,
recent studies have suggested that methylated metabolites may be partly responsible for the
adverse effects associated with arsenic exposure (Gontijo and Bittencourt, 2005).
Various types of skin manifestation and other arsenic toxicity were observed from
melanosis, keratosis, hyperkeratosis, dorsal keratosis, and non-pitting oedema to gangrene and
cancer (Ghosh and Singh, 2010). Overall prevalence of clinical neuropathy was observed in
different populations of South 24 Parganas, North 24 Parganas, Murshidabad, Nadia and
Malda districts of West Bengal and in the states of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and
Chhattisgarh (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). The children in the affected areas are more prone to
contamination than the adults. The following features are commonly noted from the arsenic
affected populations of India:
1. Skin itching to sun rays, burning and watering of the eyes, weight loss, loss of appetite,
weakness, fatigue, limited physical activities and working capacities.
-113-
2. Chronic respiratory complains are also common. Chronic cough with or without
expectoration was evident in more than 50% affected populations.
3. Gastrointestinal symptoms of anorexia, nausea, dyspepsia, altered taste, pain in abdomen,
enlarged liver and spleen, and ascites (collection of fluid in abdomen).
4. Moderate to severe anemia was evident in some cases,
5. Conjunctival congestion, Leg edema was less common (Ghosh and Singh, 2010).
3. ARSENIC CONTAMINATION IN INDIA

In India, since the groundwater arsenic contamination was first detected from WestBengal in 1983, a number of other states, namely; Jharkhand, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh in flood
plain of the Ganga River; Assam and Manipur in flood plain of the Brahamaputra and Imphal
rivers, and Rajnandgaon village in Chhattisgarh state have chronically been exposed to
drinking arsenic contaminated hand tube-wells water above permissible limit of 50 g/L
(Bhattacharya et al., 2007). Many more North-Eastern Hill States in the flood plains are also
suspected to have the possibility of arsenic in groundwater. Even with every additional
survey, new arsenic affected villages and people suffering from arsenic related diseases are
being reported. All the arsenic affected river plains have the river routes originated from the
Himalayan region. Over the years, the problem of groundwater arsenic contamination has
been complicated, to a large variability at both the local and regional scale, by a number of
unknown factors.
Since groundwater arsenic contamination was first reported in year 1983 from 33
affected villages in four districts in West Bengal, the number of villages has increased to 3417
in 111 blocks in nine districts till 2008 in West Bengal alone (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). In
1999, the arsenic groundwater contamination and its health effects in Rajnandgaon district of
Chattisgarh state were also detected. In 2002, two villages, Barisban and Semaria Ojhapatti, in
Bhojpur district, located in the western part of the Bihar state, were reported having
contamination exceeding 50 g/L. As of 2008, out of 38 districts of Bihar, 57 blocks from 15
districts having total population of nearly 10 million have been reported to be affected by
arsenic groundwater contamination above 50g/L (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). During 2003,
25 arsenic affected villages of Ballia district in Uttar Pradesh and people suffering from skin
lesions came into limelight. During 2003-2004, the groundwater arsenic contamination and
consequent suffering of hundreds of people were reported from 17 villages of the Sahibgunj
district of Jharkhand state, in the middle Ganga plain (Ghosh and Singh, 2010). In 2004,
arsenic concentration was also reported from Assam in pockets of 2 districts (Bhattacharya et
al., 2007). In 2007, Manipur state, one of the seven North-Eastern Hill States, had also come
into limelight of arsenic contamination in groundwater.
Till 2008, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh in flood plain of Ganga River;
Assam and Manipur in flood plain of Brahamaputra and Imphal rivers, and Rajnandgaon
village in Chhattisgarh state have so far been exposed to drinking arsenic contaminated hand
tube-wells water (Ghosh and Singh, 2010). The area and population of these states are 529674
km2 & approx. 360 million respectively, in which 88688 km. and approximately 50 million
people have been projected vulnerable to groundwater arsenic contamination (Bhattacharya et
al., 2007).
-114-
Figure 1. World map showing known occurrences of groundwater with elevated

concentrations of geogenic arsenic (adapted from Nriagu et al., 2007).
The affected zones are highlighted.
4. THEORIES OF ARSENIC MOBILIZATION

There are several hypotheses of arsenic mobilization (Ravenscroft et al., 2001; Nickson
et al., 2000). The authors assumed that arsenic is adsorbed under oxidizing conditions as
pentavalent arsenic (arsenate) and becomes mobile as the more toxic trivalent arsenic under
reducing conditions (arsenite). Therefore, three types of release mechanisms have been
discussed:
4. 1. Oxidation of arsenic-bearing sulfides
In connection with the drawdown of the water table, caused by massive extraction of
irrigation water, oxygen enters the anoxic aquifer. The oxidation mainly of pyrite is
anticipated and yields a release of sorbed As(III) as As(V) (Ravenscroft et al., 2001).
However, neither researches showed a relation between the distribution of arsenic pollution
and that of irrigation nor the sediments contain adequate amounts of arsenical pyrite to be
important for this mechanism. Furthermore, the release of sulfate during the oxidation of
pyrite should correlate with the dissolved arsenic. In reality, iron and sulfate are mutually
exclusive in solution (Ravenscroft et al., 2001; Kinniburgh and Smedley, 2001). Lastly, it
should be mentioned that arsenic pollution is uncommon in hand-dug wells (< 10 m) which
are shallowest and therefore most of them are exposed to atmospheric oxygen but they are
commonly arsenic free (Ravenscroft et al., 2001).
-115-
4. 2. Competitive exchange of phosphate from fertilizer

This hypothesis is based on the greatly increased use of phosphate fertilizer over the
past 15 years in Bangladesh. But there is no causal link between arsenic and the application of
fertilizer. Among other reasons experiments showed that only 2 g/L of arsenic would be
desorbed by 5 g/L phosphorus concentration (upper limit in Bangladesh groundwater) in
groundwater (Ravenscroft et al., 2001).
4. 3. Reduction and dissolution of FeOOH
This explanation is the most widely accepted one at the moment. Arsenic pollution
occurs because FeOOH is reduced by microbes driven oxidation of organic matter and caused
the release of arsenic, which is generally attached on the FeOOH particles (Bhattacharya et.
al., 2007). Sorbed As(V) is generally reduced to As(III) by this mechanism. Arsenic
accumulates as a result of an extremely low regional hydraulic gradient that caused low
flushing rates (Kinniburgh et al., 2003).
5. GROUNDWATER ARSENIC CONTAMINATION IN BENGAL BASIN

The sources of arsenic in Bengal Delta is geogenic and related to the sediments
deposited by the rivers Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna (Nickson et al., 2000). Bengal
delta is one of the largest deltas of the world and accommodates an enormous volume of
sediments deposited during the Tertiary and Quaternary periods (Bhattacharya et al., 2007).
During the late Holocene period, marshy or swampy lowlands developed in several parts of
the Bengal Delta Plain and formed the peat and other sediments rich in organic matter
(Umitsu, 1993). The pool of arsenic-contaminated groundwater is hosted by the sediments
deposited by the meandering river channels during the late Quaternary or the Holocene age.
Lithology of these sedimentary successions includes sand, representing the channel facies,
and the overbank facies, comprising predominantly silt and clay, and exhibit a typical fining
upward character (Bhattacharya et. al., 2007). The fine-grained overbank facies are rich in
organic matter (Nickson et al., 1998; Bhattacharya et al., 1999; Mazumdar, 2000).
In groundwater, inorganic arsenic commonly exists as As(V) (arsenate) and As(III)
(arsenite), among which the trivalant state is considered to be more mobile and toxic for
living organisms (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). The mobility of arsenic is mainly determined by
the adsorption capacity on the mineral surfaces, which is controlled by geochemical
parameters such as pH, Eh, ionic composition, and mineral type (Bissen and Frimmel, 2003).
However, redox processes in the aquifers trigger the mobility through dissolution of the Fe
oxides that transfer substantial amounts of arsenic into the aqueous phases (Bhattacharya et
al., 2007).
The Bengal basin is regarded to be the most acutely arsenic affected geological province
in the world (Mukherjee et al., 2008). The Bengal arsenic disaster is possibly the worst
environmental disaster in the history of human civilization, and much more serious than
Bhopal Gas Tragedy or Chernobyl Nuclear disaster. The Bengal basin was formed by the
sedimentation of the river Ganga, Brahmaputra and Meghna, along with their tributaries and
distributaries (Mukherjee et al., 2008). The densely populated areas of Bangladesh and India,
although traversed by two of the worlds largest river systems and recipient of several meters
-116-
of rainfall yearly, faces unparalleled water-supply problems (Roychowdhury, 2008). More

than 100 million people are living in the arsenic affected districts of India and Bangladesh.
In West Bengal, during 1980s, some cases of arsenical dermatosis in the districts of
North 24 Parganas, South 24 Parganas, Nadia, Murshidabad and Burdwan were reported. By
the end of December 2001, this problem spreads from few villages to 2065 villages of 75
blocks in 8 districts. 9 districts out of 19 in West Bengal, 78 blocks and around 3150 villages
are affected with arsenic-contaminated groundwater (Chakraborti et al., 2002). Groundwater
is regularly used for agricultural and household purposes in these areas. As rainwater is
insufficient to support the water demand of the increasing population and intensive
agricultural system of West Bengal, thousands of shallow tube-wells were installed for
irrigation in last 40-45 years (Roychowdhury, 2008). A vast majority of these tube wells have
been installed privately with locally available expertise, without any check of the quality and
yield of the water that originates from them. Heavy withdrawal of groundwater, especially
during that lean period, resulted in oxygenated decomposition of pyrites forming Fe2+ and
Fe3+ sulphates and sulphuric acid, which in turn are responsible for arsenic mobilization
(Bhattacharya et al., 2007). Due to different hydro-chemical behaviors of aquifers in the
Bengal delta, the redox potential, pH, temperature, Ca-HCO3 or Ca-Mg-HCO3 water type
vary substantially which control the arsenic dynamics in the area. Chakraborti and his group
analyzed over 1,25,000 water samples for studying arsenic contamination in the Bengal basin
and reported that arsenic levels in the affected areas of the basin vary between <1 and 1300
mg/l (Chakraborti et al., 2002, 2004).
6. ACCUMULATION, BEHAVIOUR AND DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN SOIL

The sources of arsenic and other trace elements may be anthropogenic or they can
naturally occur as minor constituents in soil compartments (Kabata-Pendias and Pendias,
1984). Generally, arsenic is deposited on the top soils from burning of fossil fuels, mining and
smelting activities, incineration of wastes, cement production, application of arsenic contained
fertilizers and pesticides, disposal of sludge containing arsenic etc (Bhattacharya et al., 2007).
Besides, the use of arsenic contaminated groundwater for irrigation purpose in crop fields
elevates arsenic concentration in surface soil and in the plants grown in those areas (Meharg
and Rahman, 2003). Many millions of cubic meters of underground water are used for
agricultural irrigation. Much of this groundwater is contaminated with arsenic, which is
deposited in the soil in contact with the irrigation water throughout the year. In Bangladesh
and West Bengal most of the arsenic added from contaminated irrigation water in rice
cultivation remains on the surface soil (Norra et al., 2005). The reason behind it is the soil
used for paddy cultivation is deliberately puddled to hold water on the surface and they
develop a compacted, impervious ploughpan (Brammer, 1996). Ferric hydroxide plays an
important role in controlling the concentration of arsenic in soils and in aqueous media, and
the phenomenon can be expressed by the following reaction:
Fe3+ + 3H2O Fe(OH)3 + 3H+ (Naidu and Bhattacharya, 2006).
Arsenic is associated with the primary sulfides; (hydro) oxides of Al, Fe and Mn; clays;
sulfates; phosphates and carbonates in the Bengal Delta Plain (Foster, 2003).
-117-
Arsenic is released in the soil by weathering of arsenopyrite (FeAsS) and sulfide

minerals. The grain sizes of soil particles play an important role in controlling the distribution
and mobility of arsenic. The surface area of the fine-grained particles is large and hence can
adsorb more arsenic (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). For this reason, clay minerals, Fe-, Al-, and
Mn (hydro) oxides are important sinks for arsenic in the aquifers and sediment layers in
Bengal Delta. Arsenic in soil normally occurs in pentavalent state under oxidizing conditions
while under reducing conditions trivalent As(III) species prevail that is more mobile and
bioavailable (Bhattacharya et al., 2012a).
Arsenic also can get biomethylated (i.e. addition of CH3 to arsenic through biological
activity) in the soilwater, sediment-water interfaces through the activity of bacteria (such as
Escherichia coli, Flavobacteriun sp, Methanobacterium sp) and fungi (such as Aspergillus
glaucus, Candida humicola). In the course of biomethylation, As(III) is oxidized to As(V) and
CH3O+ is reduced to CH3 and stable arsenic oxy-species was formed (Bhattacharya et al.,
2007) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Arsenic cycle in the environment (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2002).
-118-
Soil arsenic levels are very much related with local well water arsenic concentration,
which suggests that the source of soil contamination is the irrigation water (Bhattacharya et
al., 2012a). The absorption of arsenic by plants is influenced by the concentration of arsenic in
the soil. In Bangladesh, where irrigation is carried out with arsenic contaminated
groundwater, soil arsenic level can reach up to 83 mg/kg (Roychowdhury et al., 2005a).
Except in the rainy season, the agricultural land has been exposed to irrigated groundwater
round the year. Sometimes the farmers used to run the shallow tube wells in the rainy season
due to insufficient rain. Most of the vegetables and other crops, used by the villagers were
cultivated in this area and entered the local market.
7. MICROBIAL TRANSFORMATION OF ARSENIC IN THE ENVIRONMENT

Microorganisms have remarkable ability to evolve the necessary molecular mechanisms
to cope with and even benefit from high concentrations of toxic metals in the environment.
Mobilization of arsenic in natural ecosystems is predominantly controlled by microbial
activities and interactions. Microorganisms can control the toxicity of arsenic by either
actively exporting it out of the cell or by chemically altering it to a less toxic form. Some
microorganisms can use arsenic to their advantages and can involve it in energy generating
reactions (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2002). Generally, microbial transformations of arsenic can
be divided into two broad categories: redox conversions of inorganic forms and conversions
from inorganic to organic form and vice versa (by methylation and demethylation). The genes
that encode the proteins involved in arsenic resistance in bacteria are either of plasmid or
chromosomal origins, and have been best studied in Escherichia coli. The arsenate reductase
genes (arrA and arrB) have been identified in a number of bacteria, which can reduce arsenic
from pentavalant to trivalent form (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2002). Microbial processes
involved in arsenic reduction and mobilization are many times faster than inorganic chemical
transformations. Arsenate reductases have been found in phylogenetically diverse groups of
microorganisms. These genes are often found on plasmids, making them available for lateral
gene transfer and distribution within arsenic bearing environments. Arsenite oxidase catalyzes
the oxidation of highly toxic trivalent arsenic to less toxic pentavalant arsenic
(Mukhopadhyay et al., 2002). Although detoxification and energy generating processes are
the most common mechanisms involved in the transformations of arsenic, both prokaryotic
and eukaryotic organisms can also methylate arsenic. Some organisms can utilize methylated
arsenic compounds as carbon and energy sources in a process known as demethylation
(Oremland and Stolz, 2005). Bacteria from the genera Alcaligenes, Pseudomonas, and
Mycobacterium have been found to demethylate arsenic compounds. So, microbiological
processes can either solubilize arsenic, thereby increasing their bioavailability and potential
toxicity, or can immobilize arsenic, and thereby reduce the bioavailability.
Several strains of microorganisms (like Bacillus arsenicus, Bacillus indicus,
Pseudomonas sp., Acinetobactor sp., etc.) have been isolated from Bengal delta which can
resist or tolerate arsenic. 16s rRNA sequencing revealed unique characters of these organisms
isolated from the region (Islam et al., 2004; Shivaji et al., 2005). These biotransformation
processes are important components of biogeochemical cycles and may also be used in
bioremediation of arsenic. Arsenic holds a number of varying valence states, which highly
differ in toxicity and mobility. A thorough understanding of microbial populations, their
-119-
ecological behavior and interactions in the natural environment is very much important and
relevant for using these organisms in arsenic bioremediation.
8. ARSENIC BIOACCUMULATION AND TOXICITY IN PLANTS

8. 1. Molecular mechanisms of arsenic biotransformation
The arsenic concentrations in the edible parts of a plant depend on the availability of the
soil arsenic and the accumulation and translocation ability of a plant (Huang et al., 2006).
Several plant species such as ferns have been studied for their ability to accumulate arsenic.
The Chinese brake fern (Pteris vittata) was reported as the hyperaccumulator of arsenic and
can remove arsenic from soil (Ma et al., 2001). Arsenic(V) is also reduced by other plant
species such as Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) and Arabidopsis thaliana (Tripathi et al.,
2007). However, these species have a lower arsenic accumulation capacity compared to P.
vittata. High amount of arsenic can be accumulated in vegetables including arum, Kachu sak
(Colocasia antiquorum) and Ipomea sp. (kalmi) (Das et al., 2004). Other plants like maize,
barley and ryegrass, Spertina alterniflora can also accumulate arsenic efficiently into plant
bodies (Sadiq, 1986; Jiang and Singh, 1994; Carbonell et al., 1998).
Studies on the impact of the arsenic-contaminated groundwater irrigation on crops have
attracted attention recently (Roychowdhury et al. 2002; Norra et al., 2005; Huang et al., 2006;
Rahman et al., 2007). These works document the enrichment of arsenic in soil and a limited
uptake by different plants, including rice, cereals, and vegetables. Mandal and Suzuki (2002)
have reported that the arsenic concentration in plants varied from less than 0.01 to about 5.0
mg kg-1. Roychowdhury et al. (2002), studying arsenic affected areas of Murshidabad, West
Bengal, India, found that the accumulation of arsenic in various food composites (potato skin,
leaves of vegetables, rice, wheat, cumin, turmeric powder, and cereals) ranged between
<0.0004 and 0.693 mgkg-1. It has also been proved that arsenic can accumulate in the rice
grains upto 7.5 mg/kg even when the source of contamination is 2 km. away (Roychowdhury
et al., 2002).
Plants rarely accumulate arsenic at concentrations that can create health hazards,
because phytotoxicity usually occurs before reaching such concentrations (Walsh et al.,
1977). However, to assess the risk posed by arsenic in the diet, arsenic speciation must be
ascertained, since inorganic arsenic (arsenate and arsenite) is more toxic than methylated
organic (MMA and DMA) forms found in plants (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002;
Abedin et al., 2002).
Besides the anthropogenic sources of arsenic species such as sodium arsenate or sodium
salts of methylarsonate acid (weed killer), calcium arsenate (herbicide), lead arsenate
(insecticide), etc, methylated arsenic species are formed in soils by biomethylation processes.
The inorganic and methylated forms can reach the rice grains though an absorption
mechanism (Pizarro et al., 2003).
In general, plants uptake and metabolize As(V) through the phosphate transport
channels (Tripathi et al., 2007). Because of their chemical similarity, arsenic competes with
phosphate for root uptake and interferes with metabolic processes like ATP synthesis and
oxidative phosphorylation (Tripathi et al., 2007). Arsenate is taken up by phosphate
transporter in plants grown on aerobic soils. The presence of phosphate has a negative effect
on the bioaccumulation of pentavalant arsenic in plants (Liu et al., 2004).
-120-
If arsenate has lower concentration than phosphate level in soil, phosphate is a much
better competitor for uptake than arsenate (Meharg et al., 1994). In contrast, arsenite is the
predominant species of arsenic in soil under anaerobic conditions (Masscheleyn et al., 1991).
Recent studies have shown that in rice plants, arsenite is taken up at high rates of influx which
follows the Michaelis-Menten kinetics (Abedin et al., 2002). In rice, arsenic uptake shares the
same pathway as silicon uptake. Rice is a strong accumulator of silicon which may allow
efficient uptake and translocation of arsenite in the shoots (Hodson et al., 2005). The
aquaporin Lsi1 (protein) which is responsible for the influx of silicon (as silicic acid) into the
root cells, is permeable to arsenite (Ma et al., 2008). The reason behind it is the similarity
between the size and coordination chemistry of silicic acid and arsenite. Inside plant tissues,
arsenic is reduced from pentavalent to trivalent state or is biotransformed to less toxic organic
compounds such as DMA, MMA (Ma et al., 2008). Trivalent arsenic can form complex with
thiol groups inside the plant tissues (Zhao et al., 2010). Many plants can synthesize arsenic
reductase, which can convert the pentavalant arsenic into trivalent form (Zhao et al., 2010).
Interestingly, trivalent arsenic is the predominant species in the plant tissues and 50-65 % of
the total arsenic accumulated in stem or leaf parts is trivalent (Peralta-Videa et al., 2009). The
arsenic detoxification in plants involves arsenic mobilization from roots to aerial parts of the
plant (translocation). This movement is controlled by the external arsenic concentration (Zhao
et al., 2010). Plants generally have a low efficiency of arsenic translocation from roots to
shoots, may be due to the formation of complexes of arsenite and thiol compounds and
subsequent sequestration in the root vacuoles, or because of the strong efflux of arsenite to the
external medium (Zhao et al., 2009).
Toxicity limit and mobility of arsenic in soil depend on the properties of soil like
particle size, texture, mineral nutrient content, pH, presence of other ions, moisture regimes,
transformations by microbes and the chemical form of arsenic (Bhattacharya et al., 2007).
Arsenic is more mobile and bio-available in sandy soil than in clayey soil. The effect of
arsenic toxicity in plants increase in low pH, but the uptake mechanism can enhance in higher
pH soil. These properties of soil are very much relevant to evaluate the influence of arsenic on
its accumulation and distribution in plants. Arsenic accumulation in soil irrigated by arsenic
contaminated water and its transfer into rice may vary depending on the soil types, cropping
pattern, arsenic concentration in irrigation water, distance from the water source, depth of
water source and duration of the monsoon flood (Hossain et al., 2008). The typical transfer
factor for arsenic varied from 0.01 to 0.1 (Kloke et al., 1984). The volume of water used for
the irrigation of a specific crop varies considerably depending not only on climatic factors, but
also on the permeability of soil. The water demand of rice is particularly high; the volume of
water used for irrigation of Boro rice in the Indo-Gangetic Plain are in the range between
1000 and 1800 mm/a (Gupta et al., 2002; Huq et al., 2003).
In seasonally flooded soil, soil change between the oxidized state in the dry season and
the reduced state in the wet season when the soil is submerged (Bhattacharya et al., 2012). So
arsenic may present in the soil in different form and in different concentration in different
times of the year. However, flooding leads to fundamental changes in the soil. The overlying
floodwater inhibits oxygen movement into the soil and the remaining oxygen is depleted
within a short time (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). Rice plants are generally grown in submerged
soil condition, where arsenic bioavailability is generally high (Bhattacharya et al., 2007). Rice
roots can constitutively form aerenchyma and waterlogging or O2-deficient conditions can
enhance the process (Colmer, 2003a; Colmer, 2003b; Colmer et al., 2006).
-121-
In roots, O2 is essential for respiration to provide sufficient energy for growth,

maintenance, and nutrient uptake processes, and up to 3040% of the O2 supplied via the root
aerenchyma is being lost to the soil by the process of radial oxygen loss (Colmer, 2003a;
Colmer, 2003b). Formation of aerenchyma and radical oxygen loss can enhance the
waterlogging tolerance mechanisms of rice plants (Colmer, 2003a; Colmer, 2003b). There is a
significant correlation between radical oxygen loss and arsenic tolerance and accumulation in
rice plants (Mei et al., 2009).
It is known that rice maintains relatively high redox potentials in the rhizosphere, by a
continuous flux of O2 from the shoots toward the roots. The release of O2 enables the
accumulation of Fe-oxyhydroxides (typically lepidocrocite, goethite, ferrihydrite) in the
rhizosphere of living plants (Norra et al., 2005). Consequently, facultative and obligate
anaerobes use oxidized forms in soil for respiration, e.g., iron hydroxide is reduced to Fe 2+
and simultaneously arsenic dissolves into soil solution (Inskeep et al., 2002). Further, rice
plant can carry oxygen from the air through stems and can distribute it into the root zone. The
oxidized zone created around the root area helps to form oxidized iron plaque. Iron plaque can
efficiently bind arsenic and can reduce its translocation to the above ground tissues (straw,
husk and grain) of the plant (Liu et al., 2006). It has also been reported that the accumulation
of arsenic in rice plants is highest in the root zones and decease significantly in the upper parts
of the plant (Bhattacharya et al., 2009). Arsenate has a high affinity for iron plaque and can
react with Fe (III) to give the highly insoluble iron arsenate. The concentration of arsenic in
rice roots can reach as high as 160 mg/kg due to the formation of iron plaques (Bhattacharya
et al., 2007). So, iron plaque can affect arsenic dynamics significantly in the rhizosphere
zones (Norra et al., 2005). Arsenate behaves as a phosphate analogue, and like phosphate is
relatively immobile in soil (Liu et al., 2004). Arsenic phytotoxicity is generally greater in
sandy soils than that of clayey soils as sandy soils contain comparatively low amounts of iron
oxides and clays (Sheppard, 1992).
8. 2. Arsenic toxicity in plant seeds
Seed is one of the most vital components of the worlds diet. Cereal grains alone, which
comprise around 90% of all cultivated seeds, contribute up to half of the global per capita
energy intake (Bewley, 1997). Not surprisingly then, seed biology is one of the most
extensively researched areas in plant physiology. With the seed, the independence of the next
generation of plants begins. The seed, containing the embryo as the new plant in miniature, is
structurally and physiologically equipped for its role as a dispersal unit and is well provided
with food reserves to sustain the growing seedling until it establishes itself as a self-sufficient,
autotrophic organism. In comparison, seed germination frequency and the early seedling
growth are more sensitive to metal toxicity because some of the plants defense mechanisms
have not yet developed and hence effects at early stages of plant development can be very
useful for toxicity assessment (Xiaoli et al., 2007). Seed germination is the first physiological
process affected by metals (Shanker et al., 2005).
Heavy metals including arsenic have been reported to stimulate the formation of free
radicals and reactive oxygen species leading to oxidative stress (Zhang et al., 2003; Azevedo
et al., 2005). Interestingly, some recent reports have provided experimental evidence that
arsenic-induced generation of free radicals can cause cell damage and death through
activation of oxidative sensitive signaling pathways (Kamat et al., 2005). Requejo and Tena
(2005) proved that the induction of oxidative stress is the main process underlying arsenic
-122-
toxicity in plants. Plants respond to oxidative stress by increasing the production of

antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) or
peroxidase (POD) (Bhattacharya et al., 2012b, Bhattacharya et al., 2013a). The increase in
lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (Hartley-Whitaker et al., 2001a) and
peroxidase (POD) activity (Miteva and Peycheva 1999) were correlated with increasing
arsenic stress. According to them, arsenic accumulated in the plant tissue stimulates
peroxidase synthesis during the early phases of plant development, long before the visible
changes take place. Bengal delta is mainly agriculture dependent and the effects of arsenic
toxicity in seed germination can in turn affect the agricultural economy of that area.
Figure 3. Simplified scheme summarizing the effects of metals and metalloids on seeds; the
images of Oryza sativa (rice) are used to represent seeds and plants generally.
Kranner and Colville, 2011).
8. 3. Arsenic contamination in rice

Globally, over 400 million metric tons of milled rice is consumed each year, which
accounts for around 50% of total cereal consumption of the world (IRRI, 2007). Rice is the
main crop in West Bengal and 73% of the calorific intake of the people is from rice. Huge
amount of water is needed for rice cultivation. Rice is generally grown in submerged flooded
condition, where arsenic bioavailability is high in soil (Duxbury and Panaullah, 2007). Rice is
much more efficient at assimilating arsenic into its grain than other staple cereal crops
(Williams et al., 2007). Arsenic accumulation in soil irrigated by arsenic contaminated water
and its transfer into rice may vary depending on the soil types, cropping pattern, arsenic
concentration in irrigation water, distance from the water source, depth of water source and
-123-

duration of the monsoon flood (Hossain et al., 2008). As() and MMA (Monomethyl arsenic
acid) are phytotoxic to rice plants and the degree of arsenic uptake in rice followed as
As()>MMA>As(V)>DMA (Meharg and Rahman, 2003). The root, shoot and leaf tissue of
rice plant contain mainly inorganic As (III) and As (V) while the rice grain contain
predominantly DMA (85 to 94%) and As (III) (Liu et al., 2005).
Drinking water is responsible for 13% of total arsenic intake where cooked rice can
contribute up to 56% of total intake which indicates rice can contribute most of the daily
arsenic intake (Ohno et al., 2007). Rice can contribute 51-60% of the dietary intake of arsenic
in Bangladesh if rice grains contain 0.5-0.7 mg/kg of arsenic and drinking water contains 100
ppb of arsenic in average (considering 2 litre/day water consumption by each person) (Meharg
and Rahman, 2003). According to a study, rice grain can contribute about 95% of arsenic,
with respect to the dietary intakes of arsenic from the food samples (Roychowdhury, 2008).
Infants and young people generally have higher exposure to arsenic through rice on a body
mass basis, when compared to the adults (Meharg et al., 2008). The median increased lifetime
cancer risk from drinking water, rice and cooking of rice was found to be 48%, 44% and 8%
respectively (Mondal and Polya, 2008). It has been reported that the concentration of arsenic
in cooked rice was higher than that of raw rice. The concentration of arsenic in rice is
increased when it was cooked with arsenic contaminated groundwater and the gruel was not
discarded after cooking. The arsenic was absorbed in the cooked rice from water, thus
increased the concentration (Roychowdhury, 2008).
Arsenic concentration in boro rice is much higher than in aman variety, because much
higher amount of water is needed for boro cultivation compared to aman cultivation
(Williams et al., 2006). Some researchers found a much higher transfer factor of arsenic from
soil to the shoots of rice plants compared to wheat and barley (Su et al., 2010). Additionally,
unpolished rice has been reported to contain higher arsenic concentrations compared to
polished rice samples because the milling and polishing process significantly reduces arsenic
concentration in rice grains. Arsenic also highly accumulates in the grain surface, which is
one of the main causes of such difference. Modern health conscious people generally prefer
whole grain diet, which, in turn can increase the toxicity level in human body if the grains are
contaminated with arsenic.
Rice bran is a byproduct of polishing whole grain rice. Stabilized rice bran extract,
which is also known as bran soluble, is sold as a natural superfood and premier heath food
product, because of its high food value. A number of companies supply this product to
malnourished children as daily ration in many countries. The supplement has already been
used in Malawi, Guatemala, and El Salvador, with plans to expand further into Latin America,
India, and the Caribbean. Proper risk assessment has not been done yet on this product, which
can be a source of arsenic contamination (Sun et al., 2008). A wide range of other rice
products are used as baby foods such as cereal dusts, noodles, biscuits- all of which can be
significant sources of arsenic contamination in infants and babies (Bhattacharya et al., 2012).
Apart from rice, arsenic has been found in some vegetables in Bengal Delta including data
sak and lal sak, kalmi (Bengali name), Indian mustard, maize, barley etc. (Huq et al., 2006).
As arsenic species are very much toxic to plants, they can affect the overall production
of rice and other vegetables, and can affect the economy of a country as whole. Arsenic
toxicity can reduce the rate of photosynthesis in rice plants, which, in turn can reduce the
chlorophyll content, and can affect the growth and yield of rice (Rahman et al., 2007). Rice
yield has been reported to decrease by 10% when the concentration of arsenic in soil is as
-124-
high as 25 mg/kg (Xiong et al., 1987). It has been shown that in T-Aman rice (Oryza sativa
L.), the grain and straw yields were significantly reduced by the artificial introduction of
arsenic in soil (Azad et al., 2009). Experiments proved that arsenic in the growth medium of
rice seedlings caused quantitative changes in the level of RNA, soluble proteins, free amino
acids and proline and inhibits the activities of RNase and protease. Further, arsenite toxicity
can lead to change in isoform pattern of RNase in growing rice seedlings. The impact of such
responses could be visible in the form of decreased growth and vigour of rice seedlings in
arsenic-polluted environments (Mishra and Dubey, 2006). Figure 3 shows the adverse effects
of arsenic and other heavy metal toxicity on rice plants.
The major portion of the population at risk of arsenic poisoning also suffer from
malnutrition in the Bengal delta of India and Bangladesh, and there is a direct link between
malnutrition and the risk of arsenic poisoning in human body (Milton et al., 2010). The long
term effects are slowly executed by more cancers, stillbirths, defective childbirths,
hypertension and lots of other diseases (Milton et al., 2010). Several studies showed that
arsenic accumulation significantly affects body weight, biological and intellectual
development in children (Majumder et al., 2000). This, in turn, can affect the social and
economic structure of a family as a whole. Rural populations generally eat locally-grown rice
in arsenic affected areas and the chances of arsenic toxicity are much more than the urban
populations. In urban areas, middle class and rich people usually eat wheat, vegetables and
potatoes from mixed or diverse sources, which contain lesser amount of arsenic in general.
Difference in locations and economic classes should be examined properly in dietary studies
to identify the problem in details.
The accumulation of arsenic in plants occurs primarily through the root systems and the
highest arsenic concentrations have been reported in plant roots and tubers. The edible parts
of the tuber crops are exposed continuously to soil and irrigation water contaminated with
arsenic, which, in turn, can increase arsenic level in the tuber part (Bhattacharya et al.,
2012a).
Rice straw is often used as a cattle feed in South Asia. This represents another entry
route of arsenic into the food chain, as rice straw typically contains much higher amount of
arsenic than grains .Cattle population also used to drink water contaminated with arsenic in
those areas, which, in turn, can further increase the toxicity level. But the toxicity mechanism
is highly dependent on the nature of arsenic species in the straw and on the metabolism of the
cattle (Abedin et al., 2002). Cattle manure is often used as fuel in household purposes, which
can also increase the contamination risk (Pal et al., 2007). Besides, the dry straw often been
used by people as fuel, which can release arsenic in air as oxides, and can cause pollution and
health hazards.
8. 4. Mitigation policies for arsenic contamination in rice
When arsenic is accumulated in the rice grains, it is very difficult to remove it properly.
Cooking with high volume of arsenic free water can help to some extent, but, it can also
remove beneficial vitamins and thus can decrease the food value. Levels of toxicity also
depend on the cooking methods which vary in different regions. For example, in Hungary,
rice is generally cooked with an excessive amount of water and the water remaining is
discarded; on the other hand, in China, rice is generally cooked with aliquots of water in order
to absorb it all (Mihucz et al., 2007).
-125-
Aerobic cultivation of rice can effectively reduce arsenic bioaccumulation because in

anaerobic submerged field condition, the chance of arsenic bioavailability is high (Xu et al.,
2008). Rainwater can be an effective source which can be used in irrigation in large scale,
through proper water management systems, which, in turn can reduce the use of arsenic
contaminated water in irrigation in respective contaminated zones. Rainwater can also reduce
the concentration of arsenic in surface soil, which, in turn, can reduce the accumulation of
arsenic in rice and other edible plants. The annual average rainfall in India is 4000 billion
cubic meters, but the annual water requirement of India is only 450 billion cubic meters (Rao,
1995). It clearly indicates that the main problem of Indian water resources is mismanagement
and unsustainable use of water, which, in turn, is making the whole situation paradoxical. We
should focus on the proper management of rainwater, which, in turn can reduce the
groundwater consumption in agricultural sectors. In West Bengal and Bangladesh, the surface
water bodies like rivers, wetlands, flooded river basins and oxbow lakes are among the largest
in the world (Roychowdhury et al., 2005a). Due to our negligence most of these water bodies
is now contaminated with waste materials and pollutants. If we can use these resources
properly for drinking, cooking, agricultural irrigation and other purposes, then we can save
the possible arsenic contamination from groundwater. Pisciculture, duckery, vegetable
cultivation at the bank of these water bodies can also improve the economic condition of the
local people. Proper watershed management and villager participation are needed to assist in
the utilization of these huge bodies of water. Where soils are contaminated with arsenic and
an alternative safe irrigation supply cannot easily be provided, farmers should be encouraged
to increase crop production under rainfed conditions where this is practical. Another
management system can be done by providing the affected population with proper protein diet
and protein supplements which can create a shield against arsenic poisoning (Maiti and
Chatterjee, 2000).
Phytoremediation is an emerging sustainable technology which can be successfully used
to remove heavy metals like arsenic from the contaminated soil, sediments, groundwater and
surface water (Alkorta and Garbisu, 2001). The plants which can accumulate arsenic in their
bodies should be identified properly so that they can be used in a large scale to remove arsenic
from soil effectively. Recently, researchers from the University of Georgia have established a
new technique by introducing genetically modified plants which can tolerate arsenic and have
the capacity to remove arsenic from contaminated sites (Dhankher et al., 2002). As some
specific plants like the Chinese brake fern have the capacity to accumulate arsenic, there is a
possibility of existence of some genes which are responsible for the detoxification
mechanism. Further research can be done for the isolation of these genes, which can be used
effectively in arsenic bioremediation process. Genetic variation is an important factor for
controlling arsenic uptake, speciation and reaction to arsenic stress (Tripathi et al., 2007). The
accumulation of arsenic in rice plants varied with different variety of rice (Norton et al.,
2009). For example, arsenic speciation analysis showed that brown rice can accumulate
higher amount of inorganic arsenic than white rice (Meharg et al., 2008). Experiments
showed that Indian basmati rice varieties has 5-fold lower total arsenic content, and 2.75-fold
lower inorganic arsenic content than the US rice varieties (Williams et al., 2005).
Arsenic resistant genotypes of rice varieties should be considered to reduce the
accumulation rate, which, in turn, can solve the problem partly. Some genotypes which can
accumulate lesser amount of arsenic, specially the trivalent toxic form, can be used in
breeding programmes and genetic researches for identifying the beneficial genes which can
-126-
decrease trivalent arsenic in grains. Production of rice grains that possess a high
organic/inorganic arsenic ratio could help to reduce inorganic arsenic contamination level.
Development of a toxicity database is very much essential for different rice cultivars
and other crops for setting standards for arsenic in flooded and non-flooded soils. The low
levels of inorganic arsenic detected in Chinese rice could be important in rice cultivation to
reduce the dietary exposure (Williams et al., 2006). Phytoexcluder crops for arsenic can also
be developed through laboratory techniques or through proper identification of existing plant
species for growing crops in arsenic contaminated soils without absorbing arsenic (Hossain et
al., 2008). A search should be made for locally-adapted wetland plants that could extract
arsenic from soils during the monsoon season when deeply flooded.
9. Use of nanotechnology in arsenic mitigation
Nanomaterials are fast emerging as potent candidates for water treatment in place of
conventional technologies which, notwithstanding their efficacy, are often very expensive and
time consuming. This would be in particular, immensely beneficial for developing nations
like India and Bangladesh where cost of implementation of any new removal process could
become an important criterion in determining its success. Qualitatively speaking
nanomaterials can be substituted for conventional materials that require more raw materials,
are more energy intensive to produce or are known to be environmentally harmful. Employing
green chemistry principles for the production of nanoparticles can lead to a great reduction in
waste generation, less hazardous chemical syntheses, and an inherently safer chemistry in
general (Shah and Ahmed, 2011). However, to substantiate these claims more quantitative
data is required and whether replacing traditional materials with nanoparticles does indeed
result in lower energy and material consumption and prevention of unwanted or unanticipated
side effects is still open to debate. There is also a wide debate about the safety of
nanoparticles and their potential impact on the environment. There is fervent hope that
nanotechnology can play a significant role in providing clean water to the developing
countries in an efficient, cheap and sustainable way. On the other hand, the potential adverse
effects of nanoparticles cannot be overlooked either. For instance the catalytic activity of a
nanoparticle can be advantageous when used for the degradation of pollutants, but can trigger
a toxic response when taken up by a cell. So this Janus face of nanotechnology can prove to
be a hurdle in its widespread adoption. However as mentioned before nanotechnology can
step in a big way in lowering the cost and hence become more effective than current
techniques for the removal of contaminants from water in the long run (Shah and Ahmed,
2011). In this perspective nanoparticles can be used as potent sorbents as separation media, as
catalysts for photochemical destruction of contaminants; nanosized zerovalent iron used for
the removal of metals and organic compounds from water and nanofiltration membranes
(Savage and Diallo, 2005).
Two vital properties make nanoparticles highly lucrative as sorbents. On a mass basis,
they have much larger surface areas compared to macro particles. They can also be enhanced
with various reactor groups to increase their chemical affinity towards target compounds.
These properties are increasingly being exploited by workers to develop highly selective and
efficient sorbents for removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from contaminated water.
Many materials have properties dependent on size. Hematite particles with a diameter of 7
nm, for example, adsorbed Cu ions at lower pH values than particles of 25 or 88 nm diameter,
indicating the enhanced surface reactivity for iron oxides particles with decreasing diameter.
-127-

Peng et al. (2005) have developed a novel sorbent with high surface area (189 m2/g)
consisting of cerium oxide supported on carbon nanotubes (CeO2-CNTs). They showed that
the CeO2-CNT particles are effective sorbents for As(V). This goes to show that how
chemically modified nanomaterials can enhance the adsorption capacity of a traditional
substance. Deliyanni et al. (2003) have also synthesized and characterized a novel As(V)
sorbent consisting of akaganeite [-FeOOH] nanocrystals. For the removal of metals and
other inorganic ions, mainly nanosized metal oxides. Equilibrium adsorption of As(III) and
As(V) by nanocrystalline TiO2 occurred within 4 hours and the adsorption followed pseudosecond-order kinetics in experiments conducted by Peng et al. (2005). Bang et al. (2005)
reported that equilibrium was reached in 63 minutes for adsorption of As(V) adsorption and
240 minutes for adsorption of As(III). Manna et al. (2004) investigated the removal of As(III)
using a synthesized crystalline hydrous titanium dioxide. They found that 70% of As(III)
adsorption occurred within the first 30 minutes of contact time. Nano-agglomerates of mixed
oxides such as ironcerium, ironmanganese, ironzirconium, irontitanium, ironchromium,
cerium-manganese etc. have been synthesized and successfully employed for pollutant
removal (i.e. arsenic, fluoride etc.) from aqueous solutions (Gupta et al., 2011, Gupta et al.,
2012, Bhattacharya et al., 2013b). Metals such as zinc and tin possess similar reduction
capabilities of iron (Boronina, 1995). Like iron, these metals are converted to metal oxides in
the decontamination process. Other metals have been combined with iron as well to produce
similar results. Both iron-nickel and iron-copper bimetallic particles have been demonstrated
to degrade trichloroethane and trichloroethene (Lien, 2001).
Another example is iron-platinum particles, which possess similar capabilities in
degrading chlorinated benzenes (Lien, 2001). The photo-oxidation of As(III) to As(V) in the
presence of TiO2 and light and subsequent adsorption into TiO2 has also been reported. Bissen
et al. (2001) have showed that photo-oxidation of As(III) to As(V) occurs within minutes. No
reverse reaction of As(V) to As(III) was observed, and while As(III) was oxidized by UV
light in the absence of TiO2, the reaction was way too slow to be feasible in water treatment.
The reaction rate did not depend on the pH of the solution. Peng et al. (2005) reported that
rapid photo-oxidation of As(III) to As(V) occurred in the presence of sunlight, nanocrystalline
TiO2, and oxygen. In natural groundwater, Peng et al. (2005) believed that oxidation of
As(III) to As(V) and subsequent adsorption of As(V) onto TiO2 would completely eradicate
arsenic at slightly acidic pH values.
Nanoparticles in particular will have important impacts on various fields of
environmental technology and engineering not least in water treatment. However most of
techniques for the treatment of wastewater involving nanotechnology so far have only been
investigated in laboratory scale and not all of them are likely to be feasible alternatives for
existing treatment technologies mainly perhaps due to economic reasons (Gupta et al., 2011).
This makes it difficult to predict what the future holds for us at this stage concerning this
nascent technology. Also the incorporation of nanomaterials into existing water purification
systems is another key challenge. Membrane processes such as RO, NF are becoming the
standardised water purification techniques for public utilities and industry because they are
flexible, scalable, modular and relatively easy to operate and maintain (Shah and Ahmed,
2011). Thus further laboratory investigations and pilot scale testing will be needed to integrate
novel nanostructured membranes into existing water purification systems. Also the
environmental fate and toxicity of a material are areas of concern in material selection and
design for water purification.
-128-
10. CONCLUSIONS
In the rural areas of the Bengal Delta, arsenic contamination raised a number of social
problems which are continuously weakening the structural integrity of rural society. Married
women affected by arsenic are sent back to their parents with their children. Affected children
are prevented from attending school, and many young men are deprived of jobs when
employers find black spots on their body and hands. Affected young unmarried women and
men are advised to stay unmarried. They are not allowed even to go to their neighbors to fetch
water. (Biswas et al., 1998; Samanta et al., 1999).
The overall scenario can reflect that the contamination of arsenic in water, soil as well
as in the food chain in Bengal Delta must be addressed properly to understand the importance
of arsenic exposure from food sources. The importance of rice in food security in India and
Bangladesh and the high dietary intake of rice indicate that the impact of arsenic in
groundwater on rice productivity and quality should continue to be carefully monitored
(Roychowdhury et al., 2005a). Arsenic may serve as essential role in growth and nutrition in
minute concentration, but excess intake can be lethal for a population. Arsenic is an element,
not a compound, so it is not possible to break or metabolize it chemically or biologically. The
only thing we can do is to remove it or to prevent it from accumulation and contamination.
Intensive investigation on a complete food chain is urgently needed in the arsenic
contaminated zones, which should be our priority in future researches (Bhattacharya et al.,
2012). Differences in environmental and socio-economic conditions within the contaminated
regions and within countries need to be considered in a sustainable manner.
References
[1] Abedin, M.J., Meharg, A.A. 2002. Relative toxicity of arsenite and arsenate on
germination and early seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant and Soil 243: 57-66.
[2] Alkorta, I., Garbisu, C. 2001. Phytoremediation of organic contaminants in soils.
Bioresource Technology 79: 273-276.
[3] Azad, M.A.K., Islam, M.N., Alam, A., Mahmud, H., Islam, M.A., Karim, M.R., Rahman,
M. 2009. Arsenic uptake and phytotoxicity of T-aman rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in the Asamended soil of Bangladesh. Environmentalist 29: 436-440.
[4] Azevedo, H., Gomes, C., Fernandes, J., Loureiro, S., Santos, C. 2005. Cadmium effects on
sunflower growth and photosynthesis. Journal of Plant Nutrition 28: 2211-2220.
[5] Bang, J.J., Guerrero, P.A., Lopez, D.A., Murr, L.E., and Esquivel, E.V. 2004. Carbon
nanotubes and other fullerene nanocrystals in domestic propane and natural gas combustion
streams. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 4: 716-718.
[6] Benko, V., Dobisova, A., Macaj, M. 1971. Arsenic in the hair of a non-occupationally
exposed population. Atmospheric Environment 5: 275-279.
-129-
[7] Bewley, D.J. 1997. Seed germination and dormancy. The Plant Cell 9: 1055-1066.
[8] Bhattacharya, P., Mukherjee, A.B., Bundschuh, J., Zevenhoven, R., Loeppert, R. (ed.).
2007. Arsenic in Soil and Groundwater Environment: Biogeochemical Interactions, Health
Effects and Remediation. Elsevier Press, Amsterdam, UK.
[9] Bhattacharya, P., Samal, A.C., Majumdar, J., Santra, S.C. 2009. Transfer of Arsenic from
Groundwater and Paddy Soil to Rice Plant (Oryza sativa L.): A Micro Level Study in West
Bengal, India. World Journal of Agricultural Science 5: 425-431.
[10] Bhattacharya, S., Gupta, K., Debnath, S., Ghosh, U.C., Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay and
Aniruddha Mukhopadhyay. 2012a. Arsenic bioaccumulation in rice and edible plants and
subsequent transmission through food chain in Bengal basin: a review of the perspectives for
environmental health. Toxicolology and Environmental Chemistry 94(3): 429-441.
[11] Bhattacharya, S., Sarkar, N.D., Banerjee, S., Banerjee, P., Mukherjee, S., Chattopadhyay,
D.J., Mukhopadhyay, A. 2012b. Effects of Arsenic toxicity on germination, seedling growth
and Peroxidase activity in Chickpea seeds. International Journal of Agriculture and Food
Science 2(4): 131-137.
[12] Bhattacharya, S., Goswami, M.R., Ahammad, R., Mukherjee, S., Poddar, A.,
Chattopadhyay, D.J., Mukhopadhyay, A. 2013a. Changes in Germination, Seedling growth
and Peroxidase activity in Pisum sativum and Phaseolus vulgaris in response to arsenic
stress. In: Environmental Biotechnology, Biotech Books, New Delhi, India, pp. 41-53.
[13] Bhattacharya, S., Saha, I., Chattopadhyay, D.J., Mukhopadhyay, A., Ghosh, U.C.,
Chatterjee, D. 2013b. Role of nanotechnology in water treatment and purification: Potential
applications and implications. International Journal of Chemical Science and Technology
3(3): 59-64.
[14] Bhattachrya, P., Jacks, G., Gustafsson, J.P., Sracek, A., Olofsson, B., Aaltonen, J., Khan,
A.A., Akhter, S.H., Ahmed, K.M. 1999. High-arsenic groundwater in the alluvial aquifers of
Bengal Delta Plains in Bangladesh: Genesis and low-cost remediation. KTH Dhaka
University Seminar on Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in the Bengal Delta Plains of
Bangladesh, February 7-8, 1999. pp. 6-9.
[15] Bissen, M., and Frimmel, F.H. 2003. Arsenic A Review. Part I: occurrence, toxicity,
speciation and mobility. Acta hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica 31: 9-18.
[16] Bissen, M., Vieillard-Baron, M.M., Schindelin, A.J., Frimmel, F.H. 2001. TiO2catalyzed photooxidation of arsenite to arsenate in aqueous samples. Chemosphere 44(4):
751-757.
[17] Biswas, B.K., Dhar, R.K., Samanta, G., Mandal, B.K., Chakraborti, D., Faruk, I., Islarn,
K.S., Chowdhury, M., Islam, A., Roy, S. 1998. Detailed study report of Samta, one of the
arsenic-affected villages of Jessore district. Bangladesh Current Science 74 (2): 134-145.
-130-
[18] Boronina T., Klabunde, K., Sergeev, G. 1995. Destruction of Organohalides in Water
Using Metal Particles- Carbon Tetrachloride/Water Reactions with Magnesium, Tin and
Zinc. Environmental Science and Technology 29 (6): 1511-1517.
[19] Brammer H. 1996. The geography of the soils of Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Press
Ltd.
[20] Carbonell, A.A., Aarabi, M.A., Delaune, R.D., Grabrell, R.P., Patrick Jr., W.H. 1998.
The influence of arsenic chemical form and concentration on Spertina partens and Spertina
alterniflora growth and tissue arsenic concentration. Plant and Soil 198: 33-43.
[21] Chakraborti, D., Rahman M.M., Paul K., Chowdhury U.K, Sengupta M.K., Lodh D.,
Chanda C.R., Saha K.C., Mukherjee S.C. 2002. Arsenic calamity in the Indian subcontinent:
what lessons have been learned?, Talanta 58: 3-22.
[22] Chakraborti, D., Sengupta, M. K., Rahaman, M. M. 2004. Groundwater arsenic
contamination and its health effects in the GangaMeghnaBrahmaputra Plain. Journal of
Environmental Monitoring 6: 7483.
[23] Colmer T.D., Cox M.C.H., Voesenek L.A.C.J. 2006. Root aeration in rice (Oryza
sativa): evaluation of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene as possible regulators of root
acclimatizations. New Phytologist 170: 767-777.
[24] Colmer, T.D. 2003a. Aerenchyma and an inducible barrier to radial oxygen loss
facilitate root aeration in upland, paddy and deep-water rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of
Botany 91: 301-309.
[25] Colmer, T.D. 2003b. Long-distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on
internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 17-36.
[26] Concha, G., Vogler, G., Nermell, B., Vahter, M. 1998. Low-level arsenic excretion in
breast milk of native Andean women exposed to high levels of arsenic in the drinking water.
International Archive of Occupational Environmental Health 71(1): 42-46.
[27] Das, H.K., Mitra, A.K., Sengupta, P.K., Hossain, A., Islam, F., Rabbani, G.H. 2004.
Arsenic concentrations in rice, vegetables, and fish in Bangladesh: a preliminary study.
Environment International 30: 383-387.
[28] Deliyanni E.A., Bakoyannakis, D.N., Zouboulis, A.I., and Matis, K.A. 2003. Sorption of
As(V) ions by akaganeite-type nanocrystals. Chemosphere 50(1): 155-163.
[29] Dhankher, O.P., Li, Y., Rosen, B.P., Shi, J., Salt, D., Senecoff, J.F., Sashtiand, N.A.,
Meagher, R.B. 2002. Engineered tolerance and hyperaccumulation of arsenic in plants by
combining arsenate reductase and g -glutamylcysteine synthetase expression. Nature
Biotechnology 20: 1140-1145.
-131-
[30] Duxbury, J.M., Panaullah, G. 2007. Remediation of arsenic for agriculture sustainability,
food security and health in Bangladesh. Working paper, Water Service, FAO, Rome, pp. 11.
[31] Ellenhorn, M.J. 1997. Arsenic, In: Ellenhorns Medical Toxicology: Diagnosis and
Treatment of Human Poisoning, 2nd ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 1538.
[32] Foster, A. L. 2003. Spectroscopic investigations of arsenic species in solid phases. In:
Welch, A. H., Stollenwerk, K. G. (eds.) Arsenic in Groundwater: Geochemistry and
Occurrence. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 27-65.
[33] Ghosh, N.C., Singh, R.D. 2010. Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in India:
Vulnerability and Scope for Remedy. Proceedings of the workshop on Arsenic contamination
in groundwater- source, migration and mitigation: Future research needs. 23rd-24th July, 2010,
IISWBM, Kolkata, India.
[34] Gontijo, B., and Bittencourt, F. 2005. Arsenic: A historical review. Brazilian Annals of
Dermatology 80(1): 91-95.
[35] Grandjean, P., Weihe, P., Needham, L.L., Burse, V.W., Patterson, D.G., Sampson, E.J.,
Jorgensen, P.J., Vahter, M. 1995. Effect of a seafood diet on mercury, selenium, arsenic, and
PCBs and other organochlorines in human milk. Environmental Research 71: 29-38.
[36] Greenwood, N. N., Earnshaw, A. 1989. Chemistry of the Elements. Pergamon Press, New
York.
[37] Gupta, K., Bhattacharya, S., Chattopadhyay, D.J., Mukhopadhyay, A., Biswas, H., Dutta,
J., Roy, N.R., Ghosh, U.C. 2011. Ceria associated manganese oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis,
characterization and arsenic(V) sorption behavior. Chemical Engineering Journal 172: 219229.
[38] Gupta, K., Bhattacharya, S., Chattopadhyay, D.J., Mukhopadhyay, A., Maity, A.,
Ghosh, U.C. 2012. Arsenic(III) Sorption Behavior of Ceria Associated Manganese Oxide
Nanoparticles. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 377: 269-276.
[39] Gupta, R.K., Naresh, R.K., Hobbs, P.R., Ladha, J.K. 2002. Adopting conservation
agriculture in ricewheat systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plainsnew opportunities for saving
water. Water Wise Rice Production Workshop, 5-10 April, 2002. Los Banos, Philippines.
[40] Hartley-Whitaker J, Ainsworth G, Meharg AA. 2001a. Copper and arsenate induced
oxidative stress in Holcus lanatus L. clones with differential sensitivity. Plant Cell and
Environment 24: 713-722.
[41] Hodson, M.J., White, P.J., Mead, A., Broadley, M.R. 2005. Phylogenetic variation in the
silicon composition of plants. Annals of Botany 96: 1027-1046.
-132-
[42] Hossain, M.B., Jahiruddin, M., Panaullah, G.M., Loeppert, R.H., Islam, M.R., Duxbury,
J.M. 2008. Spatial variability of arsenic concentration in soils and plants, and its relationship
with iron, manganese and phosphorus. Environmental Pollution 156: 739-744.
[43] Huang, R., Gao, S., Wang, W., Staunton, S., Wang, G. 2006. Soil arsenic availability
and the transfer of soil arsenic to crops in suburban areas in Fujian Province, southeast
China. Science of the Total Environment 368: 531-541.
[44] Huq, S.M., Joardar, J.C., Pervin, S., Correll, R., Naidu, R. 2006. Arsenic Contamination
in Food-chain: Transfer of Arsenic into Food Materials through Groundwater Irrigation.
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 24: 305-316.
[45] Huq, S.M.I., Rahman, A., Sultana, N., Naidu, R. 2003. Extent and severity of arsenic
contamination in soils of Bangladesh. In: Ahmed., F., Ali, A., Adeel, Z. (Eds.), Fate of Arsenic
in the Environment. Proceedings of International Symposium: Fate of Arsenic in the
Environment. BUET, Dhaka and United Nations University, Tokyo.
[46] Inskeep, W.P., McDermott, T.R., Fendorf, S. 2002. Arsenic(V)/(III) cycling in soils and
natural waters: Chemical and microbiological processes. In: Frankenberger, W. T., Jr., (Ed.)
Environmental Chemistry of Arsenic. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 183-216.
[47] IRRI. Ricestat 2007. Retrieved from:
Retrieved on March 9, 2012.
http://www.irri.org/science/ricestat/index.asp,
[48] Islam, F.S., Gault, A.G., Boothman, D., Polya, D.A., Charnock, J.M., Chatterjee, D.,
Lloyd, J.R. 2004. Role of metal- reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta
sediments. Nature 430: 68-71.
[49] Jiang, Q.Q., Singh, B.R. 1994. Effect of different form and sources of arsenite on crop
yield and arsenic concentration. Water, Air Soil Pollution 74: 321-343.
[50] Kamat, C.D.; Green, D.E.; Curilla, S.; Warnke, L.; Hamilton, J.W.; Sturup, S.; Clark, C.;
Ihnat, M.A. 2005. Role of HIF signaling on tumorigenesis in response to chronic low-dose
arsenic administration. Toxicological Sciences 86: 248-257.
[51] Kinniburg, D.G., Smedley, P.L., Davies, J., Milne, C.J., Gaus, I., Trafford, J.M., Burden,
S., Ihtisha-mul Huq, S.M., Ahmad, N., Ahmed, K.M. 2003. The scale and causes of the
groundwater arsenic problem in Bangladesh. In Welch AH, Stollenwerk KG (Eds.) Arsenic in
Ground Water: Geochemistry and Occurrence. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp.
211-257.
[52] Kinniburgh, D.G., Smedley, P.L. 2001. Arsenic contamination of groundwater in
Bangladesh. Volume 1: Summary. BGS Technical Report WC/00/19. British Geological
Survey & Department of Public Health Engineering, pp. 15.
-133-
[53] Kloke, A., Sauerback, D.R., Vetter H. 1984. The contamination of plants and soils with
heavy metals and the transport of metals in terrestrial food chains. In: Nriagu J. (Ed.)
Changing metal cycles and human health. Springer, Berlin, pp. 113-41.
[54] Lien, H., Zhang, W. 2001. Complete dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes with
nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces A 191: 97-105.
[55] Liu, W. J., Zhu, Y. G., Smith, F. A. 2005. Effects of iron and manganese plaques on
arsenic uptake by rice seedlings (Oryza sativa ) Grown in solution culture supplied with
arsenate and arsenite. Plant and Soil 277: 127-138.
[56] Liu, W.J., Zhu, Y.G., Hu. Y., Williams, P.N., Gault, A.G., Meharg, A.A., Charnock,
J.M., Smith, F.A. 2006. Arsenic Sequestration in Iron Plaque, Its Accumulation and
Speciation in Mature Rice Plants (Oryza Sativa L.). Environmental Science and Technology
40 (18): 57305736.
[57] Liu, W.J., Zhu, Y.G., Smith, F.A., Smith, S.E. 2004. Do phosphorus nutrition and iron
plaque alter arsenate (As) uptake by rice seedlings in hydroponic culture? New Phytologist
162: 481-488.
[58] Liu, W.J., Zhu, Y.G., Smith, S.A., Smith, S.E. 2004. Do iron plaque and genotypes affect
arsenate uptake and translocation by rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) grown in solution
culture? Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 1707-1713.
[59] Ma, J.F., Yamaji, N., Mitani, N., Xu, X.Y., Su, Y.H., McGrath, S.P., Zhao, F.J. 2008.
Transporters of arsenite in rice and their role in arsenic accumulation in rice grain.
Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 105: 9931-9935.
[60] Ma, L.Q., Komar, K.M., Tu, C., Zhang, W., Cai, Y., Kennelley, E.D. 2001. A fern that
hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature 409: 579.
[61] Mahata, J., Basu, A., Ghoshal, S., Sarkar, J.N., Roy, A.K., Poddar, G. 2003.
Chromossomal aberrations and sister chromatid exchanges in individuals exposed to arsenic
through drinking water in West Bengal, India. Mutation Research 534: 133-43.
[62] Maiti, S., Chatterjee, A.K. 2000. Differential response of cellular antioxidant mechanism
of liver and kidney to arsenic exposure and its relation to dietary protein deficiency.
Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 8: 227-235.
[63] Majumder, D.N.G., Haque, R., Ghosh, N., De, B.K., Santra, A., Chakraborti, D., Smith,
A.H. 2000. Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West
Bengal, India. International Journal of Epidemiology 29: 1047-1052.
[64] Manna, B., Dasgupta, M., Ghosh, U.C. 2004. Crystalline Hydrous Titanium (IV) Oxide
(CHTO): An Arsenic (III) Scavenger. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology
53(7): 483-495.
-134-
[65] Masscheleyn, P.H., Dlaune, R.D., Patrick, W.H. 1991. Effect of redox potential and pH
on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environmental Science and
Technology 25: 1414-1418.
[66] Matsui, M., Nishigori, C., Toyokuni, S., Takada, J., Akaboshi, M., Ishikawa, M. 1999.
The role of oxidative DNA damage in human arsenic carcinogenesis: detection of 8-hidroxy2'-deoxyguanosine in arsenicrelated Bowen's disease. Journal of Investigative dermatology
113: 26-31.
[67] Mazumdar, M.L. 2000. Groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh:
Hydrogeochemical studies at Tala Thana in Satkhira District, Southwestern Bangladesh.
M.Sc. thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
[68] Meharg, A.A., Hartley-Whitaker, J. 2002. Arsenic uptake and metabolism in arsenic
resistant and nonresistant plant species. New Phytololist 154: 29-43.
[69] Meharg, A.A., Rahman, M.M. 2003. Arsenic contamination in Bangladesh paddy field
soils: implication for rice contribution to arsenic consumption. Environmental Science and
[70] Meharg, A.A., Sun, G., Williams, P.N., Adomako, E., Deacon, C.M., Zhu, Y., Feldmann,
J. Raab, A. 2008. Inorganic arsenic levels in baby rice are of concern. Environmental
Pollution 152: 746-749.
[71] Mei, X.Q., Ye, Z.H., Wong, M.H. 2009. The relationship of root porosity and radial
oxygen loss on arsenic tolerance and uptake in rice grains and straw. Environmental
Pollution 157: 2550-2557.
[72] Mihucz, V.G., Tatar, E., Virag, I., Zang, C., Jao, Y., Zaray, G. 2007. Arsenic removal
from rice by washing and cooking with water. Food Chemistry 105: 1718-1725.
[73] Milton, A.H., Shahidullah, S.M., Smith, W., Hossain, K.S., Hasan, Z., Ahmed, K.T.
2010. Association between Chronic Arsenic Exposure and Nutritional Status among the
Women of Child Bearing Age: A Case-Control Study in Bangladesh. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health 7: 2811-2821.
[74] Mishra, S., Dubey, R.S. 2006. Inhibition of ribonuclease and protease activities in
arsenic exposed rice seedlings: Role of proline as enzyme protectant. Journal of Plant
Physiology 163: 927-936.
[75] Miteva, E., Peycheva, S. 1999. Arsenic accumulation and effect on peroxidase activity in
green bean and tomatoes. Bulgarian Journal of agricultural Science 5: 737-740.
[76] Mondal, B.K., and Suzuki, K.T. 2002. Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:
201-235.
-135-
[77] Mondal, D., Polya, D.A. 2008. Rice is a major exposure route for arsenic in Chakdaha
block, Nadia district, West Bengal, India: A probabilistic risk assessment. Applied
Geochemistry 23: 2987-2998.
[78] Mukherjee, A., von Brmssen, M., Scanlon, B.R., Bhattacharya, P., Fryar, A.E., Hasan,
M.A., Ahmed, K.M., Chatterjee, D., Jacks, G., Sracek, O. 2008. Hydrogeochemical
comparison and effects of overlapping redox zones on groundwater arsenic near the Western
(Bhagirathi sub-basin, India) and Eastern (Meghna sub-basin, Bangladesh) margins of the
Bengal Basin. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 99: 31-48.
[79] Mukhopadhyay, R., Rosen, B.P., Phung, L.T., Silver, S. 2002. Microbial arsenic: from
geocycles to genes and enzymes. FEMS Microbiology Review 26: 311-325.
[80] Naidu, R., and Bhattacharya, P. 2006. Management and remediation of arsenic from
contaminated water (Chapter 18). In: Naidu, R., Smith, E., Owens, G., Bhattacharya, P.,
Nadebaum, P. (eds.) Managing Arsenic in the Environment: From Soil to Human Health.
CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 331-354.
[81] Nickson, R.T., McArthur, J. M., Ravenscroft, P. 2000. Mechanism of arsenic release to
groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. Applied Geochemistry 15: 403-413.
[82] Nickson, R.T., McArthur, J.M., Burgess, W.G., Ahmed, K.M., Ravenscroft, P.,
Rahaman, M. 1998. Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater. Nature 395: 338.
[83] Norra, S., Berner, Z.A., Agarwala, P., Wagner, F., Chandrasekharam, D., Stben, D.
2005. Impact of irrigation with As rich groundwater on soil and crops: a geochemical case
study in West Bengal Delta Plain, India. Appllied Geochemistry 20: 1890-906.
[84] Norton G.J., Duan G., Dasgupta T., Islam, M.R., Lei, M., Zhu, Y., Deacon, C.M., Moran,
A.C., Islam, S., Zhao, F.J., Stroud, J.L., McGrath, S.P., Feldmann, J., Price, A.H., Meharg,
A.A. 2009. Environmental and genetic control of arsenic accumulation and speciation in rice
grain: comparing a range of common cultivars grown in contaminated sites across
Bangladesh, China, and India. Environmental Science and Technology 43: 8381-8386.
[86] Nriagu, J.O., Bhattacharya, P., Mukherjee, A.B., Bundschuh, J., Zevenhoven, R.,
Loeppert, R.H. 2007. Arsenic in soil and groundwater: an introduction. In: Bhattacharya, P.,
Mukherjee, A.B., Bundschuh, J., Zevenhoven, R., Loeppert, R.H. (Eds.) Arsenic in Soil and
Groundwater Environment: Biogeochemical Interactions, Health Effects and Remediation,
Trace Metals and other Contaminants in the Environment Volume 9 (Series Editor Nriagu,
J.O.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3-60.
[87] Ohno, K., Yanase, T., Matsuo, Y., Kimura, T., Rahman, M.H., Magara, Y., Matsui, Y.
2007. Arsenic intake via water and food by a population living in an arsenic-affected area of
Bangladesh. Science of the Total Environment 381: 68-76.
-136-
[88] Oremland, R.S., Stolz, J.F. 2005. Arsenic, microbes and contaminated aquifers. Trends
in Microbiology 13: 45-49.
[89] Pal, A., Nyack, B., Das, B., Hossain, M.A., Ahameda, S., Chakraborti., D. 2007.
Additional danger of arsenic exposure through inhalation from burning of cow dung cakes
laced with arsenic as a fuel in arsenic affected villages in Ganga-Meghna-Brahmaputra
plain. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 9: 1067-1070.
[90] Peng X., Luan, Z., Ding, J., Di, Z., Li, Y., Tian, B. 2005. Ceria nanoparticles supported
nanotubes for the removal of arsenate from water. Materials Letters 59: 399-403.
[91] Peralta-Videa, J.R., Lopez, M.L., Narayan, M., Saupe, G., Gardea-Torresdey, J. 2009.
The biochemistry of environmental heavy metal uptake by plants: Implications for the food
chain. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 41: 1665-1677.
[92] Pizarro, I., Palacios, M.G.M.A., Cmara, C. 2003. Evaluation of stability of arsenic
species in rice. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 376: 102-109.
[93] Rahman, M.A., Hasegawa, H., Rahman, M.M., Islam, M.N., Miah, M.A.M., Tasmin, A.
2007. Effect of arsenic on photosynthesis, growth and yield of five widely cultivated rice
(Oryza sativa L.) varieties in Bangladesh. Chemosphere 67: 1072-1079.
[94] Rahman, M.A., Hasegawa, H., Rahman, M.M., Rahman, M.A., Miah, M.A. 2007.
Accumulation of arsenic in tissues of rice plant (Oryza sativa L.) and its distribution in
fractions of rice grain. Chemosphere 69: 942-948.
[95] Rao, K.L. 1995. Indias Water Wealth. Publ. Orient Longman, India, pp. 234.
[96] Ratnaike, R.N. 2003. Acute and chronic arsenic toxicity. Postgraduate Medical Journal
79: 391-396.
[97] Ravenscroft, P., McArthur, J.M., Hoque, B.A. 2001. Geochemical and
palaeohydrological con-trols on pollution of groundwater by arsenic. In Chapell WR,
Abernathy CO, Calderon R (Eds) Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects VI. Elsevier Science
Ltd, Oxford, pp. 53-78.
[98] Requejo, R., Tena, M. 2005. Proteome analysis of maize roots reveals that oxidative
stress is a main contributing factor to plant arsenic toxicity. Phytochemistry 66: 1519-1528.
[99] Roychowdhury, T. 2008. Impact of sedimentary arsenic through irrigated groundwater
on soil, plants, crops and human continuum from Bengal delta: special reference to raw and
cooked rice. Food and Chemical Toxicology 46: 2856-2864.
[100] Roychowdhury, T., Tokunaga, H., Uchino, T., Ando, M. 2005a. Effect of arseniccontaminated irrigation water on agricultural land soil and plants in West Bengal, India.
Chemoshere 55: 799-810.
-137-
[101] Roychowdhury, T., Uchino, T., Tokunaga, H., Ando, M. 2002. Survey of arsenic in
food composites from an arsenic-affected area of West Bengal, India. Food and Chemical
Toxicology 40: 1611-1621.
[102] Sadiq, M. 1986. Solubility relationships of arsenic in calcareous soils and its uptake by
corns. Plant and Soil 91: 241-248.
[103] Samanta, G., Mandal, B.K., Chowdhury, T.R., Biswas, B.K., Chowdhury, U.K., Basu,
G.K., Chanda, C.R., Lodh, D., Saha, K.C., Charraborti, D. 1999. Arsenic in groundwater and
suffering of pelple in eight districts of of West Bengal, India. Proceedings of the 5th
International conference on the Biogeochemistry of trace elements. Austria. pp. 256-257.
[104] Savage, N., Diallo, M.S. 2005. Nanomaterials and water purification: Opportunities
and challenges. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 7: 331-342.
[105] Shah, M.A., Ahmed, T. 2011. Principles of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Narosa
Publishing House: New Delhi, India, pp. 34-47.
[106] Shanker, A.K., Cervantes, C., Loza-Tavera, H. 2005. Chromium toxicity in plants.
Environment International 31: 739-753.
[107] Sheppard S.C. 1992. Summary of phytotoxic levels of soil arsenic. Water Air and Soil
Pollution 64: 539-550.
[108] Shivaji, S., Suresh, K., Chaturvedi, P., Dube, S., Sengupta, S. 2005. Bacillus arsenicus
sp. nov., an arsenic-resistant bacterium isolated from a siderite concretion in West Bengal,
India. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 55: 1123-1127.
[109] Su, Y.H., McGrath, S.P., Zhao, F.J. 2010. Rice is more efficient in arsenite uptake and
translocation than wheat and barley. Plant and Soil 328: 27-34.
[110] Sun, G., Williams, P.N., Carey, A., Zhu, Y., Deacon, C., Raab, A., Feldmaan, J., Islam,
R.M., Meharg, A.A. 2008. Inorganic Arsenic in Rice Bran and Its Products Are an Order of
Magnitude Higher than in Bulk Grain. Environmental Science and Technology 42: 75427546.
[111] Tripathi, R.D., Srivastava, S., Mishra, S., Singh, N., Tuli, R., Gupta, D.K., Maathuis,
F.J.M. 2007. Arsenic hazards: strategies for tolerance and remediation by plants. Trends in
Biotechnology 25: 158-165.
[112] Umitsu, M. 1993. Late Quaternary sedimentary environments and landforms in the
Ganges Delta. Sedimentary Geology 83: 177-186.
[113] Walsh, L.M., Sumner, M.E., Keeney, D.R. 1977. Occurrence and distribution of
arsenic in soil and plants. Environmental Health Perspectives 19: 67-71.
-138-
[114] WHO. 2001. United Nations synthesis report on arsenic drinking water. World Health
Organization.
[115] Williams, P.N., Islam, M.R., Adomako, E.E., Raab, A., Hossain, S.A., Zhu, Y.G.,
Feldmann, J., Meharg, A.A. 2006. Increase in Rice Grain Arsenic for Regions of Bangladesh
Irrigating Paddies with Elevated Arsenic in Groundwater. Environmental Science and
[116] Williams, P.N., Price, A.H., Raab, A., Hossain, S.A., Feldmann, J., Meharg, A.A. 2005.
Variation in arsenic speciation and concentration in paddy rice related to dietary exposure.
Environmental Science & Technology 39: 5531-5540.
[117] Williams, P.N., Vilada, A., Deacon, C., Raab, A., Figuerola, J., Green, A.J. 2007.
Greatly enhanced arsenic shoot assimilation in rice leads to elevated grain levels compared
to wheat and barley. Environmental Science & Technology 41(19): 6854-6859.
[118] Xiaoli, C., Shimaoka, T., Xianyan, C., Qiang G., Youcai, Z. 2007. Characteristics and
mobility of heavy metals in an MSW landfill: Implications in risk assessment and reclamation.
Journal of Hazardous Materials 144 (1-2): 485-491.
[119] Xiong, X.Z., Li, P.J., Wang, Y.S., Ten, H., Wang, L.P., Song, L.P. 1987. Environmental
capacity of arsenic in soil and mathematical model. Chinese Journal of Environmental
Science 8: 8-14.
[120] Xu, X.Y., McGrath, S.P., Meharg, A., Zhao, F.J. 2008. Growing rice aerobically
markedly decreases arsenic accumulation. Environmental Science and Technology 42: 557479.
[121] Zhang, F., Shi, W., Jin, Z., Shen, Z. 2003. Response of antioxidative enzymes in
cucumber chloroplasts to toxicity. Journal of Plant Nutrition 26: 1779-1788.
[122] Zhao, F.J., Ma, J.F., Meharg, A.A., McGrath S.P. 2009. Arsenic uptake and metabolism
in plants. New Phytologist 181: 777-794.
[123] Zhao, F.J., McGrath, S.P., Meharg, A.A. 2010. Arsenic as a Food Chain Contaminant:
Mechanisms of Plant Uptake and Metabolism and Mitigation Strategies. Annual Review of
Plant Biology 61: 535-59.
( Received 12 May 2015; accepted 30 May 2015 )
-139-

Arsenic Toxicity-rICE

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Arsenic Toxicity-rICE

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Available online at www.worldscientificnews.

WSN 10 (2015) 111-139

Environmental, economic and health perspectives

Sayan Bhattacharya1,2,*, Uday Chand Ghosh2

Department of Environmental Studies, Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, India

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Presidency University, Kolkata, India

*E-mail address: sayan.evs@gmail.com , sayan_evs@yahoo.co.in

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

2. ARSENIC TOXICITY IN HUMAN BODY

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

3. ARSENIC CONTAMINATION IN INDIA

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

Figure 1. World map showing known occurrences of groundwater with elevated

4. THEORIES OF ARSENIC MOBILIZATION

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

4. 2. Competitive exchange of phosphate from fertilizer

5. GROUNDWATER ARSENIC CONTAMINATION IN BENGAL BASIN

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

of rainfall yearly, faces unparalleled water-supply problems (Roychowdhury, 2008). More

6. ACCUMULATION, BEHAVIOUR AND DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN SOIL

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

Arsenic is released in the soil by weathering of arsenopyrite (FeAsS) and sulfide

Figure 2. Arsenic cycle in the environment (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2002).

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

7. MICROBIAL TRANSFORMATION OF ARSENIC IN THE ENVIRONMENT

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

8. ARSENIC BIOACCUMULATION AND TOXICITY IN PLANTS

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

In roots, O2 is essential for respiration to provide sufficient energy for growth,

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

toxicity in plants. Plants respond to oxidative stress by increasing the production of

8. 3. Arsenic contamination in rice

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

Aerobic cultivation of rice can effectively reduce arsenic bioaccumulation because in

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

World Scientific News 10 (2015) 111-139

( Received 12 May 2015; accepted 30 May 2015 )

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen