Sie sind auf Seite 1von 42

Topic:FinancialLeverageandCapitalStructure

Agenda:
CapitalStructureinaNutshell
FinancialLeverageandItsImpactonEquityRisk
HomemadeLeverage:ReplicatingtheFinancialLeverageofaFirm
ModiglianiandMillers(M&M)PropositionsinanIdealWorld
ModiglianiandMillers(M&M)PropositionsinaTaxableWorld
ModiglianiandMillers(M&M)PropositionsinaWorldwithTaxes
andBankruptcy
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

CapitalStructureinaNutshell

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

TheCapitalStructureQuestion
Recallthatthe

formulation
1

takesthecapitalstructure(themixofdebtandequity)ofthefirm
asgiven.
Notethatthe
firmsassets,i.e.
cashflow.

istheappropriatediscountratetovaluea
, where denotesthefirmsperpetual

Capitalstructurequestion: Whatistheoptimaldebtchoice
maximizesfirmvalue ?
Answer:Itmustbethedebtchoicethatminimizes
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

that

.
3

FinancialLeverageandItsImpacton
EquityRisk

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

WhatisFinancialLeverage?
CapitalStructure:Themixofdebtandequitywhichmakesupthe
totalmarketvalue ofacompany.
FinancialLeverage: theextenttowhichacompanyiscommittedto
fixedchargesrelatedtointerestpayments.Measuredby:
thedebttovalueratio:

,or

thedebttoequityratio:
Marketleverageusesmarketvaluesofdebtandequity.
Bookleverageusesbookvaluesfromtherightsideofthebalance
sheet.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

TheEffectsofFinancialLeverage
Currentlythecompanyhasnodebt.Theproposalistoissuedebtanduse
theproceedstobuybackshares,i.e.,undergoacapitalrestructuring.

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

TheEffectsofFinancialLeverage

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

TheEffectsofFinancialLeverage
Fromtheexample:

whenEBITishigh,financialleverageraisesROEandEPSeven
higher

whenEBITislow,financialleveragelowersROEandEPSeven
lower
FinancialleverageamplifiesthevolatilityofROEandEPScausedby
changesinEBIT.
Conclusion:Financialleveragemakesequityriskier!

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

FinancialLeverageandBreakEvenEBIT
BreakevenEBITisthelevelofEBITwhichmakesearningsper
sharethesamebetweendebtandnodebtalternatives:
Fromthepreviousexamplewehave,


400,000


400,000
200,000


$800,000
400,000


400,000
200,000

400,000

$800,000
$2.00

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

FinancialLeverageandBreakEvenEBIT
IfweexpectEBITtobegreater
thanthebreakevenpoint,
thenleverageisbeneficialto
theshareholders
otherwise,leverageis
detrimentaltothe
stockholders.
IfEBITisvariableovertime,
financialleverageamplifiesthe
variabilitytoequityreturns,
i.e.equitybecomesriskier
withmoreleverage.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

10

HomemadeLeverage:Replicating
theFinancialLeverageofaFirm

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

11

CorporateBorrowingvsHomemadeLeverage
Homemadeleverage: theuseofpersonalborrowing/lendingtochangean
investorsexposuretofinancialleverage

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

12

HomemadeLeverage:MainConceptualPoints
Stockholderswhoprefermore financialleveragecanreplicatea
greaterfinancialleverageexposurebyborrowing andinvesting the
proceedsinstocks.
Stockholderswhoprefersless financialleveragecanreplicatealower
financialleverageexposurebyselling stocksandlending the
proceeds.
Conclusion: Withhomemadeleverageitmakesnodifference
whetherafirmchoosesahigheroralowerfinancialleverage.
Thevalueofafirmshouldbeindependentofcapitalstructure.

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

13

ModiglianiandMillersPropositions
inanIdealWorld

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

14

ModiglianiandMiller

ThehomemadeleverageargumentisbasedontheworkofFranco
ModiglianiandMertonMiller(M&M).
Muchofwhatweknowaboutmodernfinancetheoryisbasedon
theworkofM&M.
M&Marguedthatunderidealcircumstances,thevalueofafirmis
determinedonlybythefirmsoperations.
Nothingelseshouldaffectfirmvalue.

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

15

ModiglianiandMiller
M&Mproposethatthefirmvaluechangesonlyifthereisachangein:
(i)theriskofthefirmscashflows,and/or
(ii)thelevelofthefirmscashflows

Thetotalvalueofthefirmisnotaffectedbythemixofdebtand
equity.I.e.,

Debt
40%
Equity
60%

Equity
40%

=
Debt
60%

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

Debt
0%

Equity
100%
16

ModiglianiandMillersPropositionI
Considertwoidenticalfirmswiththesameamountofoperatingcash
flows
everyyear;exceptfirm isleveredandfirm isnot
levered(unlevered).

Note:thevalueofthefirmsareidenticalirrespectiveofthe
differenceincapitalstructure.
M&MPropositionI: Thevalueoffirmisindependentofthecapital
structure.
Since
arethesame,the
isalsothesamebetweenthe
twofirms.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
17

ModiglianiandMillersPropositionII
sOverallCostofCapital:

sOverallCostofCapital:

sEquityCostofCapital(M&MProp.II):

M&MPropositionII: Afirmscostofequityisincreasinginfinancial
leverage
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
18

ModiglianiandMillersPropositionII

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

19

ModiglianiandMillersPropositionIIandBetas
BasedonM&MPropositionII:
.
SubstitutingintheCAPMequationgivesthefollowing:

Ifthereisnofearofbankruptcythendebtisriskless,i.e.
D

0,

andequitybetabecomes
E

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

20

ModiglianiandMillersPropositionsIandII:Example
NodebtInc.isanallequityfirm.Itsequitybetais.80.TheTbill
rateis5%andthemarketriskpremiumisexpectedtobe10%.
AssumethatNodebtistaxexempt.
a)WhatisNodebtsassetbeta?

b)WhatisNodebtsWACC?

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

21

ModiglianiandMillersPropositionsIandII
SupposethatNoDebtissuesasmalldebt sosmallthatinvestors
perceivethebondstoberiskfree.Aftertheissue,thedebt
comprises10%ofthefirmscapitalstructure.

a)Whatisthebetaandtherequiredrateofreturnonthedebt?
b)Whatisthenewbetaandtherequiredrateofreturn
onthefirmsequity?
c)WhatistheWACCofNoDebtunderthenewfinancing
mix.HastheWACCchanged?Interprettheresult.
d)CalculatethebetaoftheassetsofNoDebtgiventhenew
financingmix.Hasthebetachanged?
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

22

ModiglianiandMillersPropositionsIandIIwithNoTaxes
a )S in c e t h e d e b t is r is k le s s , D 0 a n d R D 5 % .
. 8 1 1 . 8 9

E
9
R R ( R R ) D
E
1 3 % (1 3 % 5 % ) 1 1 3 . 8 9 %
9

b ) E

1 D
A

c ) W A C C 0 . 9 1 3 . 8 9 % 0 . 1 5 % 1 3 % (n o c h a n g e )
R E h a s in c r e a s e d d u e t o f in a n c ia lle v e r a g e ,b u t t h e n e w
m ix o f d e b t a n d e q u it y h a s s h if t e d t h e w e ig h t t o d e b t ,
w h ic h h a s a lo w e r c o s t .T h e n e t e f f e c t is t h e s a m e W A C C .
d )

D E

E . 1 0 . 9 . 8 9 . 8 (n o c h a n g e ).
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

23

ModiglianiandMillersPropositions
inaTaxableWorld

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

24

CorporateTaxes
Intherealworld,
(i)firmsmustpaytaxes;and
(ii)borrowingrisksexposinginvestorstobankruptcy.
Weconsiderthetaximplicationsfirst.
Interestexpenseistaxdeductible. Thisgivesrisetotaxshields.
InterestTaxShield: Thetaxsavingrelatedtoborrowing.
Financingwithdebtincreasestheamountofprofitswhichis
distributabletoallinvestors.
Therefore,debtcanincreasefirmvalue.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

25

CorporateTaxesandAfterTaxCashFlows
D=6250 with

UnleveredFirm

LeveredFirm

5000

5000

500

TaxableIncome

5000

4500

Taxes(30%)

1500

1350

NetIncome

3500

3150

Cash Flow

3500

3650

EBIT
Interest

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

26

InterestTaxShieldandFirmValue
Annualinteresttaxshield:
6250indebt@8%=500ininterestexpense
Annualtaxshield=

6250

8%

0.3

150

PVofInterestTaxShieldsintheM&MWorld:
Assumingperpetualdebtandthattaxshieldshavethesamerisk
asthedebt,
150
1875



0.08
Theexistenceofcorporatetaxesmakesdebtfinancingappealing.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

27

M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes
Considerleveredfirm andunleveredfirm again.
Whatis and sfirmvalueifprofitsaretaxable?

A ftertaxcash flo w for U is EB IT (1 T )


EB IT (1 T )
VU PVo f EB IT (1 T )
RU

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

28

M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes

A ftertaxcash flow fo r L is
(EB IT R D D ) (1 T ) R D D EB IT (1 T ) T D R D


cash flo w to
equityhold ers

cash flow to
d eb th o ld ers

VL PVof EB IT (1 T ) PVof T D R D
M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes:

VL VU PVo fTaxSh ield From D eb t


T D RD
VL VU
VU T D
RD
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

29

M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

30

M&MPropositionIIwithCorporateTaxes

Withcorporatetaxes,thevalueofthefirmisincreasinginfinancial
leverage.
Since
isconstant,ahigherfirmvaluemeansthatthe
thefirmisdecreasinginfinancialleverage.

of

ifprofitsaretaxable:

D
W A C C R D (1 T )
V
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

E
RE
V
31

M&MPropositionIIwithCorporateTaxes
DefineRUtheunleveragedcostofcapitalforthefirm,i.e.the
ofthefirmif
0.Then,
M&MProposition IIwithCorporateTaxes:
RE RU

D

( R U R D ) (1 T )
E

Implicationsforcostofequityaresimilartothecasewithouttaxes.
Equityriskincreaseswithfinancialleverage,butlessrapidly.

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

32

M&MPropositionIIwithCorporateTaxes

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

33

M&MPropositionswithCorporateTaxes
Q)WhatisNoDebtsfirmvaluebeforeandaftertheleverage
changeifithasperpetualoperatingcashflowsof$5Kandthe
corporatetaxrateis30%?
A) With

0,
1

With

1 .3
.13

$26.9

,
26.9

.3

$27.7

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

26.9

10

.3

34

M&MPropositionswithCorporateTaxes
Alternatively,
1
.13
.1362

1
9

.13

.05

.3

9/10

.05

.3

1 .3
.1262

.1362
1/10

.1262

$27.7

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

35

ModiglianiandMillersPropositions
inaWorldwithTaxesand
Bankruptcy

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

36

BankruptcyCosts
Directbankruptcycosts: Costsdirectlyassociatedwithbankruptcy;
theoutofpocketexpensesrelatedtobankruptcy,suchaslegal
fees,courtfeesandadministrativecosts.
Indirectbankruptcycosts: Costsrelatedtodifficultiesrunninga
distressedbusiness.Examples:
disruptionsinoperationsandlossofcustomers
tightercreditconstraintsfromsuppliersandbanks
lossofemployeesandcustomers
damagetofirmsreputation
Foregone+NPVinvestmentopportunities
Etc.
Bankruptcyhasanegativeeffectonfirmvalue.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

37

M&MPropositionswithTaxandBankruptcyCosts
Whiledebt
(i) generatestaxshields;
(ii) debtalsocreatescostsoffinancialdistress
Theoptimalamountofdebtfinancing isacompromise
betweentaxsavings andfinancialdistress costs.
M&MPropositionIwithTaxesandBankruptcy:


ThePVofTaxShieldsdominatesthePVofDistressCostsif
whilethelatterdominatestheformerif

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

38

M&MPropositionwithTaxandBankruptcyCosts

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

39

M&MPropositionwithTaxandBankruptcyCosts
Thetradeoffbetweenhighertaxsavingsandhighercostof
financialdistress determinestheoptimalamountofDebt.
Theoptimalamountofdebt iswherethePVoftaxshield
gainedisexactlyoffsetbytheriseinthePVofdistresscost
resultingfromanincrementalincreasein ,i.e.
Tax Shield

isalsowherethefirmvalueismaximized.

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

40

M&MPropositionwithTaxandBankruptcyCosts:Example
Assume ABC operates in a Modigliani and Miller's world with
corporate taxes and bankruptcy. Your research shows certain levels
of debt are associated with an incremental PV of financial distress
costs as shown in the table below. Based on this research, what is the
amount of debt that is closest to the optimal amount of debt for ABC?
ABC has a tax rate of 35%.

a)
b)
c)
d)
e)

Debt

IncrementalPVof
FinancialDistressCosts

83.3M
70.2M
60.7M
51.4M
43.6M

0.50
0.42
0.34
0.30
0.23

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

41

Conclusion
Financialleverageincreasesequityrisk,equitybeta,andthecostof
equitycapital.
Inanenvironmentwithtaxesandbankruptcycosts,theidealmixof
debtandequityisonethat:
(i)maximizesfirmvalueor
(ii)minimizesthefirms
Problems:
CriticalThinkingandConceptsReview:13.113.6
QuestionsandProblems:18,1117

KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016

42

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen