Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Agenda:
CapitalStructureinaNutshell
FinancialLeverageandItsImpactonEquityRisk
HomemadeLeverage:ReplicatingtheFinancialLeverageofaFirm
ModiglianiandMillers(M&M)PropositionsinanIdealWorld
ModiglianiandMillers(M&M)PropositionsinaTaxableWorld
ModiglianiandMillers(M&M)PropositionsinaWorldwithTaxes
andBankruptcy
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
CapitalStructureinaNutshell
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
TheCapitalStructureQuestion
Recallthatthe
formulation
1
takesthecapitalstructure(themixofdebtandequity)ofthefirm
asgiven.
Notethatthe
firmsassets,i.e.
cashflow.
istheappropriatediscountratetovaluea
, where denotesthefirmsperpetual
Capitalstructurequestion: Whatistheoptimaldebtchoice
maximizesfirmvalue ?
Answer:Itmustbethedebtchoicethatminimizes
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
that
.
3
FinancialLeverageandItsImpacton
EquityRisk
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
WhatisFinancialLeverage?
CapitalStructure:Themixofdebtandequitywhichmakesupthe
totalmarketvalue ofacompany.
FinancialLeverage: theextenttowhichacompanyiscommittedto
fixedchargesrelatedtointerestpayments.Measuredby:
thedebttovalueratio:
,or
thedebttoequityratio:
Marketleverageusesmarketvaluesofdebtandequity.
Bookleverageusesbookvaluesfromtherightsideofthebalance
sheet.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
TheEffectsofFinancialLeverage
Currentlythecompanyhasnodebt.Theproposalistoissuedebtanduse
theproceedstobuybackshares,i.e.,undergoacapitalrestructuring.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
TheEffectsofFinancialLeverage
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
TheEffectsofFinancialLeverage
Fromtheexample:
whenEBITishigh,financialleverageraisesROEandEPSeven
higher
whenEBITislow,financialleveragelowersROEandEPSeven
lower
FinancialleverageamplifiesthevolatilityofROEandEPScausedby
changesinEBIT.
Conclusion:Financialleveragemakesequityriskier!
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
FinancialLeverageandBreakEvenEBIT
BreakevenEBITisthelevelofEBITwhichmakesearningsper
sharethesamebetweendebtandnodebtalternatives:
Fromthepreviousexamplewehave,
400,000
400,000
200,000
$800,000
400,000
400,000
200,000
400,000
$800,000
$2.00
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
FinancialLeverageandBreakEvenEBIT
IfweexpectEBITtobegreater
thanthebreakevenpoint,
thenleverageisbeneficialto
theshareholders
otherwise,leverageis
detrimentaltothe
stockholders.
IfEBITisvariableovertime,
financialleverageamplifiesthe
variabilitytoequityreturns,
i.e.equitybecomesriskier
withmoreleverage.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
10
HomemadeLeverage:Replicating
theFinancialLeverageofaFirm
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
11
CorporateBorrowingvsHomemadeLeverage
Homemadeleverage: theuseofpersonalborrowing/lendingtochangean
investorsexposuretofinancialleverage
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
12
HomemadeLeverage:MainConceptualPoints
Stockholderswhoprefermore financialleveragecanreplicatea
greaterfinancialleverageexposurebyborrowing andinvesting the
proceedsinstocks.
Stockholderswhoprefersless financialleveragecanreplicatealower
financialleverageexposurebyselling stocksandlending the
proceeds.
Conclusion: Withhomemadeleverageitmakesnodifference
whetherafirmchoosesahigheroralowerfinancialleverage.
Thevalueofafirmshouldbeindependentofcapitalstructure.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
13
ModiglianiandMillersPropositions
inanIdealWorld
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
14
ModiglianiandMiller
ThehomemadeleverageargumentisbasedontheworkofFranco
ModiglianiandMertonMiller(M&M).
Muchofwhatweknowaboutmodernfinancetheoryisbasedon
theworkofM&M.
M&Marguedthatunderidealcircumstances,thevalueofafirmis
determinedonlybythefirmsoperations.
Nothingelseshouldaffectfirmvalue.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
15
ModiglianiandMiller
M&Mproposethatthefirmvaluechangesonlyifthereisachangein:
(i)theriskofthefirmscashflows,and/or
(ii)thelevelofthefirmscashflows
Thetotalvalueofthefirmisnotaffectedbythemixofdebtand
equity.I.e.,
Debt
40%
Equity
60%
Equity
40%
=
Debt
60%
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
Debt
0%
Equity
100%
16
ModiglianiandMillersPropositionI
Considertwoidenticalfirmswiththesameamountofoperatingcash
flows
everyyear;exceptfirm isleveredandfirm isnot
levered(unlevered).
Note:thevalueofthefirmsareidenticalirrespectiveofthe
differenceincapitalstructure.
M&MPropositionI: Thevalueoffirmisindependentofthecapital
structure.
Since
arethesame,the
isalsothesamebetweenthe
twofirms.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
17
ModiglianiandMillersPropositionII
sOverallCostofCapital:
sOverallCostofCapital:
sEquityCostofCapital(M&MProp.II):
M&MPropositionII: Afirmscostofequityisincreasinginfinancial
leverage
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
18
ModiglianiandMillersPropositionII
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
19
ModiglianiandMillersPropositionIIandBetas
BasedonM&MPropositionII:
.
SubstitutingintheCAPMequationgivesthefollowing:
Ifthereisnofearofbankruptcythendebtisriskless,i.e.
D
0,
andequitybetabecomes
E
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
20
ModiglianiandMillersPropositionsIandII:Example
NodebtInc.isanallequityfirm.Itsequitybetais.80.TheTbill
rateis5%andthemarketriskpremiumisexpectedtobe10%.
AssumethatNodebtistaxexempt.
a)WhatisNodebtsassetbeta?
b)WhatisNodebtsWACC?
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
21
ModiglianiandMillersPropositionsIandII
SupposethatNoDebtissuesasmalldebt sosmallthatinvestors
perceivethebondstoberiskfree.Aftertheissue,thedebt
comprises10%ofthefirmscapitalstructure.
a)Whatisthebetaandtherequiredrateofreturnonthedebt?
b)Whatisthenewbetaandtherequiredrateofreturn
onthefirmsequity?
c)WhatistheWACCofNoDebtunderthenewfinancing
mix.HastheWACCchanged?Interprettheresult.
d)CalculatethebetaoftheassetsofNoDebtgiventhenew
financingmix.Hasthebetachanged?
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
22
ModiglianiandMillersPropositionsIandIIwithNoTaxes
a )S in c e t h e d e b t is r is k le s s , D 0 a n d R D 5 % .
. 8 1 1 . 8 9
E
9
R R ( R R ) D
E
1 3 % (1 3 % 5 % ) 1 1 3 . 8 9 %
9
b ) E
1 D
A
c ) W A C C 0 . 9 1 3 . 8 9 % 0 . 1 5 % 1 3 % (n o c h a n g e )
R E h a s in c r e a s e d d u e t o f in a n c ia lle v e r a g e ,b u t t h e n e w
m ix o f d e b t a n d e q u it y h a s s h if t e d t h e w e ig h t t o d e b t ,
w h ic h h a s a lo w e r c o s t .T h e n e t e f f e c t is t h e s a m e W A C C .
d )
D E
E . 1 0 . 9 . 8 9 . 8 (n o c h a n g e ).
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
23
ModiglianiandMillersPropositions
inaTaxableWorld
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
24
CorporateTaxes
Intherealworld,
(i)firmsmustpaytaxes;and
(ii)borrowingrisksexposinginvestorstobankruptcy.
Weconsiderthetaximplicationsfirst.
Interestexpenseistaxdeductible. Thisgivesrisetotaxshields.
InterestTaxShield: Thetaxsavingrelatedtoborrowing.
Financingwithdebtincreasestheamountofprofitswhichis
distributabletoallinvestors.
Therefore,debtcanincreasefirmvalue.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
25
CorporateTaxesandAfterTaxCashFlows
D=6250 with
UnleveredFirm
LeveredFirm
5000
5000
500
TaxableIncome
5000
4500
Taxes(30%)
1500
1350
NetIncome
3500
3150
Cash Flow
3500
3650
EBIT
Interest
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
26
InterestTaxShieldandFirmValue
Annualinteresttaxshield:
6250indebt@8%=500ininterestexpense
Annualtaxshield=
6250
8%
0.3
150
PVofInterestTaxShieldsintheM&MWorld:
Assumingperpetualdebtandthattaxshieldshavethesamerisk
asthedebt,
150
1875
0.08
Theexistenceofcorporatetaxesmakesdebtfinancingappealing.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
27
M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes
Considerleveredfirm andunleveredfirm again.
Whatis and sfirmvalueifprofitsaretaxable?
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
28
M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes
A ftertaxcash flow fo r L is
(EB IT R D D ) (1 T ) R D D EB IT (1 T ) T D R D
cash flo w to
equityhold ers
cash flow to
d eb th o ld ers
VL PVof EB IT (1 T ) PVof T D R D
M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes:
29
M&MPropositionIwithCorporateTaxes
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
30
M&MPropositionIIwithCorporateTaxes
Withcorporatetaxes,thevalueofthefirmisincreasinginfinancial
leverage.
Since
isconstant,ahigherfirmvaluemeansthatthe
thefirmisdecreasinginfinancialleverage.
of
ifprofitsaretaxable:
D
W A C C R D (1 T )
V
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
E
RE
V
31
M&MPropositionIIwithCorporateTaxes
DefineRUtheunleveragedcostofcapitalforthefirm,i.e.the
ofthefirmif
0.Then,
M&MProposition IIwithCorporateTaxes:
RE RU
D
( R U R D ) (1 T )
E
Implicationsforcostofequityaresimilartothecasewithouttaxes.
Equityriskincreaseswithfinancialleverage,butlessrapidly.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
32
M&MPropositionIIwithCorporateTaxes
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
33
M&MPropositionswithCorporateTaxes
Q)WhatisNoDebtsfirmvaluebeforeandaftertheleverage
changeifithasperpetualoperatingcashflowsof$5Kandthe
corporatetaxrateis30%?
A) With
0,
1
With
1 .3
.13
$26.9
,
26.9
.3
$27.7
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
26.9
10
.3
34
M&MPropositionswithCorporateTaxes
Alternatively,
1
.13
.1362
1
9
.13
.05
.3
9/10
.05
.3
1 .3
.1262
.1362
1/10
.1262
$27.7
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
35
ModiglianiandMillersPropositions
inaWorldwithTaxesand
Bankruptcy
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
36
BankruptcyCosts
Directbankruptcycosts: Costsdirectlyassociatedwithbankruptcy;
theoutofpocketexpensesrelatedtobankruptcy,suchaslegal
fees,courtfeesandadministrativecosts.
Indirectbankruptcycosts: Costsrelatedtodifficultiesrunninga
distressedbusiness.Examples:
disruptionsinoperationsandlossofcustomers
tightercreditconstraintsfromsuppliersandbanks
lossofemployeesandcustomers
damagetofirmsreputation
Foregone+NPVinvestmentopportunities
Etc.
Bankruptcyhasanegativeeffectonfirmvalue.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
37
M&MPropositionswithTaxandBankruptcyCosts
Whiledebt
(i) generatestaxshields;
(ii) debtalsocreatescostsoffinancialdistress
Theoptimalamountofdebtfinancing isacompromise
betweentaxsavings andfinancialdistress costs.
M&MPropositionIwithTaxesandBankruptcy:
ThePVofTaxShieldsdominatesthePVofDistressCostsif
whilethelatterdominatestheformerif
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
38
M&MPropositionwithTaxandBankruptcyCosts
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
39
M&MPropositionwithTaxandBankruptcyCosts
Thetradeoffbetweenhighertaxsavingsandhighercostof
financialdistress determinestheoptimalamountofDebt.
Theoptimalamountofdebt iswherethePVoftaxshield
gainedisexactlyoffsetbytheriseinthePVofdistresscost
resultingfromanincrementalincreasein ,i.e.
Tax Shield
isalsowherethefirmvalueismaximized.
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
40
M&MPropositionwithTaxandBankruptcyCosts:Example
Assume ABC operates in a Modigliani and Miller's world with
corporate taxes and bankruptcy. Your research shows certain levels
of debt are associated with an incremental PV of financial distress
costs as shown in the table below. Based on this research, what is the
amount of debt that is closest to the optimal amount of debt for ABC?
ABC has a tax rate of 35%.
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Debt
IncrementalPVof
FinancialDistressCosts
83.3M
70.2M
60.7M
51.4M
43.6M
0.50
0.42
0.34
0.30
0.23
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
41
Conclusion
Financialleverageincreasesequityrisk,equitybeta,andthecostof
equitycapital.
Inanenvironmentwithtaxesandbankruptcycosts,theidealmixof
debtandequityisonethat:
(i)maximizesfirmvalueor
(ii)minimizesthefirms
Problems:
CriticalThinkingandConceptsReview:13.113.6
QuestionsandProblems:18,1117
KyungHwanShim,FINS1613S2Yr2016
42