Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Food Chemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodchem
Nanjing Research Institute for Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China
College of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 8 May 2016
Received in revised form 11 July 2016
Accepted 11 July 2016
Available online 12 July 2016
Keywords:
Peach
Carotenoid
Gene expression
Blue light
Fruit development
Harvest
a b s t r a c t
To understand better the regulatory mechanism of the carotenoid accumulation, the expression profile of
relevant carotenoid genes and metabolites were compared between two peach cultivars with different
colors during fruit development. Meanwhile, the change pattern of carotenoid content and expression
of carotenoid metabolic genes in peaches after harvest in response to blue light were also investigated.
As compared to the yellow fleshed-cultivar Jinli, lower carotenoid levels were observed in skin and pulp
in white peach cultivar Hujing, which might be explained by differentially expression of PpCCD4 gene.
With respect to Jinli, the carotenoid accumulation during fruit development in fruit skin was partially
linked with the transcriptional regulation of PpFPPS, PpGGPS, PpLCYB and PpCHYB. However, in the pulp,
the accumulation might be also associated with the increased transcriptions of PpPDS, along with the
above four genes. Blue light treatment induced carotenoid accumulation in Jinli peaches during storage.
In addition, the treated-fruit displayed higher expression of all the eight genes analysed with a lesser
extent on PpCCD4, which suggested that the much more increased carotenoid synthesis rate could result
in the higher carotenoid content in blue light-treated fruit. The results presented herein contribute to
further elucidating the regulatory mechanism of carotenoid accumulation in peach fruit.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Carotenoids are natural pigments involved in the photosynthetic process, which play indispensable roles in providing pigmentation for flowers and fruits to attract pollinators and seed
dispersers (Nisar, Li, Lu, Khin, & Pogson, 2015). Some carotenoid
compounds have been reported to exert beneficial effects on prevention of certain cancer cardiovascular diseases (Yuan, Zhang,
Nageswaran, & Li, 2015). In view of the commercial and nutritional
values of carotenoids, their biosynthetic and catabolic pathways
have been widely investigated during the past two decades
(Fig. S1) (Fraser & Bramley, 2004; Taylor & Ramsay, 2005).
Abbreviations: CCD, carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase; CHYB, b-carotene hydroxylase; DAFB, days after full bloom; DMAPP, dimethylallyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl
diphosphate; FPPS, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; FW, fresh weight; GGPP,
geranylgeranyl diphosphate; GGPS, geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase; IPP,
isopentenyl pyrophosphate; LCYB, lycopene b-cyclase; LED, light-emitting diode;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PDS, phytoene desaturase; PSY, phytoene synthase; q-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR; ZDS, f-carotene desaturase.
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: yangzf@zwu.edu.cn (Z. Yang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.085
0308-8146/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
138
It is well documented that the content and composition of carotenoid is developmentally regulated and affected by environmental stimuli (Cazzonelli & Pogson, 2010). Light has been reported to
be an important environmental factor which can regulate carotenoid metabolism in plants (Wu et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2012,
2015). In tomato irradiated with red light, the accumulation of
lycopene, as well as an increase in total carotenoid content, was
observed (Alba, Cordonnier-Pratt, & Pratt, 2000; Schofield &
Paliyath, 2005). Blue light treatment induced carotenoid accumulation effectively in the juice sacs of Satsuma mandarin and Valencia
orange (Zhang et al., 2012, 2015).
The flesh color of yellow-fleshed peach fruit (Prunus persica L.
Batsch) is produced by a group of carotenoids, which is an important factor of nutritional quality and market acceptance (Cazzonelli
& Pogson, 2010; Gil, Toms-Barbern, Hess-Pierce, & Kader, 2002).
Recently, it has been reported that the carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (PpCCD4) was the major factor in determining carotenoid
degradation in white peaches but no correlation was observed
between carotenoid accumulation and the expression levels of carotenoid biosynthetic genes (Adami et al., 2013; Brandi et al., 2011).
Despite recent efforts to understand the molecular biology of
carotenogenesis takes place in peaches, several gaps remain in
our understanding of the signals and mechanisms involved in carotenoid metabolism. To investigate further how carotenoid accumulation in peach fruit, in this study, firstly the concentration
and composition of carotenoids and the expression of several carotenoid biosynthetic genes as well as PpCCD4 in fruit peel and pulp
were comparatively analysed in two different colored-peaches
(Jinli and Hujing) during fruit development and maturation.
Then, the effect of blue light on carotenoid content and composition, and the expression of genes related to carotenoid biosynthesis
and catabolism were investigated in both peach cultivars after
harvest.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant materials, sample collection, and blue light treatment
Two peach cultivars (Prunus persica), Hujing and Jinli, were
obtained from the experimental farm of Fenghua Peach Fruit
Research Institute (Ningbo, China). Trees were subjected to standard horticultural practices. Fruit ripening stages were defined
according to Tonutti, Bonghi, Ruperti, Tornielli, and Ramina
(1997) and Gabotti, Negrini, Morgutti, Nocito, and Cocucci
(2015). At the desired times, fruit (ten fruit per each of the five
plants of each cultivar considered per each ripening stage) of
Hujing and Jinli were picked and quickly transferred to the laboratory, and fruit tissues at 98 (S1), 105 (S2), 120 (S3), 127 (S4), and
134 (S5) DAFB were sampled during the spring-summer season of
2015 (Fig. S2).
For blue light treatment, fruit of each cultivar at commercial
maturity stage were selected for uniform size and color, and then
divided into two groups randomly. The blue light treatment was
the same as that in our previous publication (Gong et al., 2015).
The fruit stored at 10 C in the dark (90% relative humidity) was
considered as the control. There were three replicates of eighty
fruit each per treatment, and samples were taken initially and at
5-day intervals during storage. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at 80 C for RNA extraction.
carotenoids content in each sample, the HPLC analyses were carried out as previously described by Taylor and Ramsay (2005).
2.3. Total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was isolated using a Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit
(Genotheramics, Suzhou, China) according to the manufacturers
instructions. Extracted RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase
(Omega, Norcross, GA) to remove any genomic DNA according to
the instruction manual. An aliquot (2 lg) of total RNA was
reverse-transcribed with the SuperRT First Strand cDNA Synthesis
Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China), following the manufacturers
instructions.
2.4. Quantitative real-time PCR (q-PCR) analysis
Q-PCR analysis was performed using the Mx3000P q-PCR System (Agilent Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the DyNAmoTM
ColorFlash SYBR Green qPCR kit (Thermo Scientific, Pittsburgh,
PA) following the manufacturers instructions. Amplifications were
performed using a total volume of 12.5 lL reaction containing
0.5 lL of the synthesized cDNA, 0.25 lL of 10 lM each forward
and reverse primers, 6.5 lL of the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix
and 5 lL of RNase-free water. The data were analysed and normalized to PpTEF2 to minimize variation in cDNA template levels. All
gene expression analyses were performed with three independent
biological replicates, and primer sequences used for real time PCR
are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
2.5. Data processing and statistical analysis
The contents of carotenoids and transcript abundance of carotenoid metabolic genes of two peach cultivars were displayed with
GraphPad Prism (v.5.01). All values are shown as the mean standard errors. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS package program version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Students
unpaired T test was used to compare the means at P < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Carotenoid content and composition analysis in fruit peel of two
peach cultivars during fruit development
The total carotenoid content in the peel of the yellow fleshedpeaches (Jinli) and white cultivar (Hujing) at five developmental
stages was analysed. At early ripening stage S1, peel of Jinli and
Hujing had similar total carotenoid levels and accumulated only
a few carotenoid compounds at about 0.04 lg g 1 fresh weight
(FW) in both cultivars. However, a significant increase in the carotenoid content of Jinli was observed from the S2 stage, while carotenoid content in Hujing remained low. At the S5 stage, the total
carotenoid content in peach peels rose to 1.3 lg g 1 FW in Jinli
but only 0.10 lg g 1 FW Hujing (Fig. 1). HPLC measurements
showed that lutein, zeaxanthin, b-carotene and b-cryptoxanthin
were predominant in both two cultivars during ripening. All of
these carotenoids progressively increased during fruit development in Jinli but nearly remained constant in Hujing during
the whole process of fruit development (Fig. 1).
139
0.15
Jinli
Hujing
1.0
**
*
0.5
0.0
S1
S2
S3
S4
0.10
***
***
***
**
0.05
S5
Ripening stage
0.15
Jinli
Hujing
***
0.10
**
0.05
*
*
0.00
S2
S3
S4
S5
Jinli
Hujing
0.15
0.10
***
***
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
0.06
Jinli
Hujing
***
***
0.04
**
0.02
0.00
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
Ripening stage
0.20
0.05
Jinli
Hujing
0.00
S1
***
***
1.5
***
**
*
0.00
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
Fig. 1. Carotenoid content and composition in fruit peel of two peach cultivars during fruit development. All data is presented as a mean of three biological replicates and
error bars represent standard errors. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the two cultivars at different stages (Students unpaired T test; P < 0.05, P < 0.01,
and P < 0.001).
PpFPPS
***
***
0.6
0.4
Jinli
Hujing
**
*
*
0.2
0.0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
6
PpPSY
Jinli
Hujing
***
**
*
0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
0.8
140
2.0
PpGGPS
***
1.5
***
1.0
**
*
0.5
S1
S2
0.15
**
**
0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
10
PpCHYB
8
6
Jinli
Hujing
***
**
**
*
0
S1
S2
S3
S5
PpPDS
Jinli
Hujing
**
*
0.05
0.00
S4
S5
Ripening stage
**
S4
0.10
S1
0.8
S2
S3
S4
S5
Jinli
Hujing
PpLCYB
***
0.6
**
0.4
**
0.2
0.0
Jinli
Hujing
S3
Ripening stage
Ripening stage
***
PpZDS
0.0
Ripening stage
3
Jinli
Hujing
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
15
PpCCD4
**
Jinli
Hujing
10
**
**
*
0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
Fig. 2. Relative transcripts of eight carotenogenic genes in fruit peel of two peach cultivars during fruit development. The expression level of PpTEF2 (JQ732180) was used to
normalize the mRNA levels for each sample. All data is presented as a mean of three biological replicates and error bars represent standard errors. Asterisks (*) indicate
significant differences between the two cultivars at different stages (Students unpaired T test; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001).
and increased during the remaining days. The contents of all these
four carotenoids could be induced by blue light treatment and as a
result, the total carotenoid content was higher in the light treatedJinli fruit than in control fruit (Fig. 5). No significant changes in
levels of total carotenoid as well as each carotenoid such as lutein,
zeaxanthin and b-cryptoxanthin were observed in Hujing fruit
during storage with a slight decrease in b-carotene content. Blue
light did not have any influence on carotenoid changes and profiles
in this cultivar (Fig. 5).
141
20
15
***
***
***
**
10
5
0
*
S1
S3
S4
Jinli
Hujing
***
***
1.0
**
*
0.0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
-Carotene content ( g/g)
***
**
1.5
**
**
1.0
0.5
S5
2.0
0.5
Jinli
Hujing
2.0
0.0
S2
Ripening stage
1.5
2.5
Jinli
Hujing
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
0.8
Jinli
Hujing
0.6
***
***
**
0.4
0.2
0.0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
Jinli
Hujing
***
***
**
*
1
0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
Fig. 3. Carotenoid content and composition in fruit pulp of two peach cultivars during fruit development. All data is presented as a mean of three biological replicates and
error bars represent standard errors. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between the two cultivars at different stages (Students unpaired T test; P < 0.05, P < 0.01,
and P < 0.001).
expression of PpFPPS and inhibited the decline of PpGGPS expression. Consequently, higher transcripts of these two genes were
detected in the blue light treated-peaches regardless of the cultivars. The other six genes such as PpPSY, PpPDS, PpZDS, PpLCYB,
PpCHYB and PpCCD4 in both cultivars showed a similar change pattern during storage. The expression in peaches increased during
the first 5 or 10 days and decreased thereafter with exceptions of
PpZDS and PpLCYB in Hujing. The transcripts of all these genes
were more abundant in light treated-fruit than that in control peaches irrespective of the cultivars (Fig. 6).
4. Discussion
In the white cultivar Hujing in present study, less or no carotenoids were observed in the skin or flesh, however, the transcripts
for all carotenoid biosynthetic genes investigated in this study
were detected, which indicated that the transcriptional regulation
of these genes was not the major reason for the low level of caro-
0.15
PpFPPS
Jinli
Hujing
**
**
0.10
0.05
0.00
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
142
0.5
PpGGPS
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
S1
S2
PpPSY
Jinli
Hujing
0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
0.15
Jinli
Hujing
**
0.10
1.5
**
*
*
1.0
0.5
0.0
S1
S2
S3
S4
0.00
S5
S1
S2
***
0.5
***
Jinli
Hujing
**
1.0
0.0
S1
S2
S3
S3
S4
S5
0.3
S4
Jinli
Hujing
PpLCYB
**
0.2
**
**
*
0.1
0.0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
S5
Ripening stage
PpCHYB
1.5
**
0.05
Ripening stage
2.0
**
**
2.0
S5
Ripening stage
Jinli
Hujing
PpZDS
S4
PpPDS
Ripening stage
2.5
S3
Ripening stage
Expression relative to PpTEF2
Ripening stage
Jinli
Hujing
**
**
0.4
20
PpCCD4
***
15
Jinli
Hujing
10
**
**
*
0
S1
S2
S3
S4
S5
Ripening stage
Fig. 4. Relative transcripts of eight carotenogenic genes in fruit pulp of two peach cultivars during fruit development. The expression level of PpTEF2 (JQ732180) was used to
normalize the mRNA levels for each sample. All data is presented as a mean of three biological replicates and error bars represent standard errors. Asterisks (*) indicate
significant differences between the two cultivars at different stages (Students unpaired T test; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001).
In the yellow colored cultivar Jinli, the composition and content of carotenoids, was resulted from the difference in carotenogenesis gene transcripts partially. FPPS and GGPS are the early
enzymes in carotenoid biosynthesis, which was reported to be
the key steps in some plants (Fraser & Bramley, 2004; Taylor &
Ramsay, 2005). In apple, MdGGPS expression took an important
part in carotenoid content in different apple cultivars
(Ampomah-Dwamena et al., 2012). Tobacco plant overexpressing
a FPPS gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae displayed a clear
143
CK-Jingli
Blue light-Jinli
CK-Hujing
Blue light-Hujing
10
**
**
*
*
*
**
**
0
0
10
15
20
**
0.4
0.2
0.0
0
10
15
20
15
10
15
20
***
***
**
0
0
10
15
20
2.0
**
1.5
*
*
1.0
0.5
0.0
0
10
15
20
in watermelon (Lv, Li, Liu, Gu, & Zhao, 2015). In addition, it must be
pointed that higher transcripts of PpPDS were also observed from
the early fruit stage (S2) to ripening (S5) in the pulp of yellow peaches in comparison with Hujing. In citrus, the expression of PDS
gene was revealed to link with b-carotene accumulation directly
(Ha, Kim, Park, Lee, & Cho, 2007). High concentration of carotenoids was related to the high PDS transcripts as well in pepper
(Ha et al., 2007). These results combined to suggest that the
increased of PpPDS in the pulp in Jinli might lead to the high level
of carotenoids in this cultivar to some extent.
Cyclisation of lycopene is a critical regulatory point of branching in carotenoid synthesis (Fraser & Bramley, 2004; Taylor &
Ramsay, 2005). LCYB and CHYB play important roles in regulating
the biosynthesis of b-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin and
b-cryptoxanthin. In chrysanthemum, the differential expression
of LCYB led to the change in carotenoid composition between
petals and leaves (Kishimoto & Ohmiya, 2006). The increased LCYB
and CHYB expression was resulted into carotenoid accumulation in
0.4
CK-Jingli
Blue light-Jinli
CK-Hujing
Blue light-Hujing
0.3
0.2
*
0.1
PpFPPS
**
**
**
0.0
0
10
15
20
144
0.4
*
*
0.3
*
*
10
0
0
10
15
20
*
*
6
4
2
10
15
20
0
0
0.0
0
0.3
*
*
*
*
2
1
0
0
10
15
15
20
**
*
**
10
15
0.1
0.0
0
20
0.3
PpLCYB
**
**
0.2
*
*
0.1
0.0
0
10
15
20
Ripening stage
*
*
10
**
0.2
20
PpCHYB
PpPDS
PpZDS
0.1
PpPSY
*
*
0.2
PpGGPS
PpCCD4
**
4
3
2
1
10
15
0
0
20
Fig. 6. Effect of blue LED light on the expression of carotenogenic genes in two peach cultivars during storage. The expression level of PpTEF2 (JQ732180) was used to
normalize the mRNA levels for each sample. All data is presented as a mean of three biological replicates and error bars represent standard errors. Asterisks (*) indicate
significant differences between light-treated and control samples (Students unpaired T test; P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001).
145
146
Tuan, P. A., Thwe, A. A., Kim, Y. B., Kim, J. K., Kim, S. J., Lee, S., et al. (2013). Effects of
white, blue, and red light-emitting diodes on carotenoid biosynthetic gene
expression levels and carotenoid accumulation in sprouts of Tartary Buckwheat
(Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61,
1235612361.
Wright, K. P., & Kader, A. A. (1997). Effect of controlled-atmosphere storage on the
quality and carotenoid content of sliced persimmons and peaches. Postharvest
Biology and Technology, 10, 8997.
Wu, M. C., Hou, C. Y., Jiang, C. M., Wang, Y. T., Wang, C. Y., Chen, H. H., et al. (2007). A
novel approach of LED light radiation improves the antioxidant activity of pea
seedlings. Food Chemistry, 101, 17531758.
Yuan, H., Zhang, J. X., Nageswaran, D., & Li, L. (2015). Carotenoid metabolism and
regulation in horticultural crops. Horticulture Research, 2, 15036.
Zhang, L., Ma, G., Kato, M., Yamawaki, K., Takagi, T., Kiriiwa, Y., et al. (2012).
Regulation of carotenoid accumulation and the expression of carotenoid
metabolic genes in citrus juice sacs in vitro. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63,
871886.
Zhang, L., Ma, G., Yamawaki, K., Ikoma, Y., Matsumoto, H., Yoshioka, T., et al. (2015).
Effect of blue LED light intensity on carotenoid accumulation in citrus juice sacs.
Journal of Plant Physiology, 188, 5863.