Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Willkommen bei Scribd!

  • Monologue Judging Criteria: Name of Judge: - SIGNATURE

    Hochgeladen von

    Acquisha Yestin Siona
    1K Ansichten4 Seiten
    This document contains judging criteria and scoresheets for four different performance categories: monologue, speech delivery, extemporaneous speech, and role play. Each category lists the criteria being judged, which include elements like character believability, dramatic impact, speech construction, and presentation skills. Contestants are listed and judges will score their performance in each category, with total scores deciding final rankings. Judges' signatures are required at the bottom to validate the scores.

    Originalbeschreibung:

    this is the criteria for oral communication culmination

    Originaltitel

    Oral Comm Tabulation

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Verfügbare Formate

    DOCX, PDF, TXT oder online auf Scribd lesen

    Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

    Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

    Dieses Dokument melden
    This document contains judging criteria and scoresheets for four different performance categories: monologue, speech delivery, extemporaneous speech, and role play. Each category lists the criteria being judged, which include elements like character believability, dramatic impact, speech construction, and presentation skills. Contestants are listed and judges will score their performance in each category, with total scores deciding final rankings. Judges' signatures are required at the bottom to validate the scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    1K Ansichten4 Seiten

    Monologue Judging Criteria: Name of Judge: - SIGNATURE

    Hochgeladen von

    Acquisha Yestin Siona
    This document contains judging criteria and scoresheets for four different performance categories: monologue, speech delivery, extemporaneous speech, and role play. Each category lists the criteria being judged, which include elements like character believability, dramatic impact, speech construction, and presentation skills. Contestants are listed and judges will score their performance in each category, with total scores deciding final rankings. Judges' signatures are required at the bottom to validate the scores.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Als DOCX, PDF, TXT herunterladen oder online auf Scribd lesen
    Markieren Sie unangemessene Inhalte
    von 4

    Name of Judge: __________________________________

    SIGNATURE: ______________________

    Monologue Judging Criteria

    Contestant

    Physical
    Vocal
    Characterization
    Characterization
    (10%)
    (10%)

    Character
    Believability
    (30%)

    Dramatic
    Build up
    (20%)

    Dramatic
    Impact (20%)

    Appropriatenes
    s (10%)

    Total

    Rank

    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4

    Speech Delivery Judging Criteria

    Contestant

    Speech
    Construction
    (20%)

    Presentation and
    Delivery (20%)

    Content of
    Speech (20%)

    Language (20%)

    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4
    Extemporaneous Speech Judging Criteria

    Voice (20%)

    Total

    Rank

    Contestant

    Voice, pitch,
    tempo, volume,
    enthusiasm
    (10%)

    Platform Deportment:
    Gestures, poise, eye
    contact, mannerisms
    (10%)

    Appearance
    (10%)

    Organization, logical,
    clearly understood,
    suitable to topic,
    coherent (30%)

    Mechanics: diction,
    grammar,
    pronunciation (10%)

    Closing: summary
    and conclusion
    (10%)

    Total

    Rank

    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4
    Role Play Judging Criteria

    Contestant

    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4

    Quality of Scenario Scenario


    was realistic, classappropriate, well-developed.
    Use of props. (20%)

    Organization role play was wellorganized. The transitions between


    the role-plays and the narrator and
    other presentation components
    flowed smoothly. (20%)

    Presentation Skills - spoke with


    appropriate eye contact, volume,
    tone, use of pauses, and gestures.
    All presenters were well-prepared
    and spoke with confidence. (50%)

    Impact Presentation fully


    engaged the
    audience. (10%)

    Total

    Rank

    CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
    MONOLOGUE
    CONTESTANT
    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4

    JUDGE 1

    JUDGE 2

    JUDGE 3

    JUDGE 4

    JUDGE 5

    TOTAL

    RANK

    JUDGE 5

    TOTAL

    RANK

    JUDGE 5

    TOTAL

    RANK

    SPEECH DELIVERY
    CONTESTANT
    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4

    JUDGE 1

    JUDGE 2

    JUDGE 3

    JUDGE 4

    EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH
    CONTESTANT
    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4

    JUDGE 1

    JUDGE 2

    JUDGE 3

    JUDGE 4

    ROLE PLAY
    CONTESTANT
    STEM
    BAP 1
    BAP 2
    GAS 3
    BAP 5
    GAS 1
    BAP 4

    JUDGE 1

    JUDGE 2

    JUDGE 3

    JUDGE 4

    JUDGE 5

    TOTAL

    Signature of judges:

    ______________________

    ______________________________

    ___________________________

    ______________________________

    ______________________________

    RANK

    Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen