Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
R. TAKAHATA
The objective of this research program is to develop a flywheel energy storage system that can replace the lead battery,
which has inherent problems in regard to maintenance and environmental protection. The basic development target has been
a "1 kWh class system (ComFESS) capable of providing a backup power supply of 300 watts for approximately 3 hours," for
which challenges were reduction of windage loss and rotation loss. Therefore, the flywheel is housed in a vacuum container,
and an active magnetic bearing has been adopted to support the flywheel without contact.
This paper concerns the watt loss as related to the specifications of the active magnetic bearing (AMB) and
motor/generator. Specifically, discussion will be focused on the approaches employed to cut down on overall watt loss of the
flywheel system to approximately a quarter of that involved in the conventional system. This improvement stems mainly from
the reduction of AMB loss achieved by means of the zero-power nonlinear control.
This zero-power nonlinear control, being able to dispense with the bias current, enables both AMB loss and power
consumption for AMB control to be minimized.
Key Words: flywheel energy storage system, ComFESS, active magnetic bearings zero-power nonlinear control,
hysteresis motor
1. Introduction
Hub
RaAMB unit
Vacuum
container
Axial AMB
Lower side RaAMB unit
Motor / Generator
29
15 000
10 000
5 000
0
Time, hours
Conventional
Target
[W]
[W]
500
100
50
50
200
95
Total
750
245
Loss of AMB
Windage loss (at 1Pa)
3. 3 Rotor Unit
The rotor unit of ComFESS is comprised of the shaft, the
hub and the flywheel. Its natural frequency was calculated as
shown in Fig. 3. The main specifications of the ComFESS are
summarized in Table 26).
200
# : Bearing
: Sensor
150
Rotor unit radius, mm
: Target
: Conventional
20 000
3. Design of ComFESS
100
50
#
50
f1B : 145Hz (1st Bending mode of hub)
100
150
200
0
100
200
300
400
500
30
75kg
Main shaft:
Length 258mm
Flywheel:
Target
900Wh (effective)
1
ComFESS BB
Measurement
25
30
70
20
AMB (1 DOF)
PM biased AxAMB
95
50
200
200
50
50
250
250
A+B
345
300
Control method:
Nonlinear control
RaAMB
AMB (4 DOF)
Control method:
Linear control
Electromagnets:
Hetero-polar
Rotor lamination:
5.86
Upper side:
direction
3.91
Lower side:
80~150DCV
40A (total)
8A (max.) for each electromagnet
Amplifier:
PWM
Total current, A
direction
AMB controller
Mean : 0.22A
1.95
0
1.95
3.91
5.86
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Time, sec
4. 1 Measurement of Loss
Each category of loss measured on the ComFESS BB at
24 000 min 1 is shown in Table 3. The motor/generator
5.86
N = 0 [rpm]
4.88
Total current, A
3.91
2.93
1.95
2.50A
0.98
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Time, sec
(b) Conventional AxAMB
31
x=110Hz
0.5
yl, m
0.5
1
x=110Hz
10
0.5
yu, m
10
0.5
0.5
0
xu, m
0.5
1
4
10
0.5
0.5
1
0
4
xl, m
10
Magnet3
f3
y hy
Magnet7
i7
x0
U7
f7
x=100Hz
i1
x0
U1
f1
Magnet1
Magnet5 i5
x0
U5
Sensor2
(a) Model of system
Value
Unit
13.672
kg
Ir
0.173
kgm
Ia
0.186
kgm
Lu
0.0499
Ll
0.1676
L1
0.02535
Ku
4.47106
Nm2/A2
Kl
4.47106
Nm2/A2
X0, Y0
0.2510
2) Test results
For this test, a feed back control system was constructed by
means of a digital signal processor (DSP). This control system
receives input of 4-direction displacement information from 4position sensors and gives output control current to 8electromagnets, i.e. a 4-input-8-output system. The control
output is supplied to the electromagnet via a D/A converter
and power amplifier.
The control performance was evaluated by the orbit
waveforms of the rotor, of which examples recorded at 6 600
min1 for upper and lower magnetic bearings were shown in
Fig. 6. Figure 7 shows the waveforms of the control current
on two electromagnets facing each other at the lower position
of the spindle. These waveforms demonstrate that at each
moment only one of the two electromagnets is energized in
accordance with the displacement of the rotor4), or that the
basic control action is properly performed.
32
1.6
1.6
1.2
1.2
0.8
0.8
0.4
0.4
f5
x=100Hz
i7, A
L1
L2
L1 Sensor1
i3
x0
U3
i5, A
Lu
600
1 200
1 800
64.8
64.4
64.4
70.9
112.2
111.7
112.1
112.1
48
47
48
41
6. Conclusion
25 000
20 000
15 000
Acknowledgement
10 000
5 000
Time, hours
33
References
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
A. KUBO*
H. KAMENO* R. TAKAHATA**
34