Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
3
Ranking Categories
4
Sample of an IRGR Evaluation Spreadsheet
Contact Information
Responsiveness
Interactivity
Timeliness
Navigability
Content
Total
50,0 15,0 1,0 1,0 7,0 2,0 3,0 2,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 10,0 15,0 10,0 1,0 1,0 4,0 1,0 3,0 2,0 5,0 1,0 4,0 3,0 100,0
23,5 13,5 1,0 1,0 5,5 2,0 1,5 2,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 5,5 6,5 8,0 5-Jan-09 relaciones.inversores@abertis.com
1,0 1,0 3,0 1,0 - 2,0 4,0 - 4,0 3,0 57,00
39,8 9,5 1,0 1,0 3,5 2,0 1,5 - 3,0 3,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 8,0 13,0 8,5 5-Jan-09 investor.relations@adidas-group.com
1,0 1,0 3,0 1,0 - 2,0 4,5 0,5 4,0 3,0 78,75
36,7 14,0 1,0 1,0 6,0 1,0 3,0 2,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 6,3 11,0 8,5 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 3,0 3,0 - 4,5 0,5 4,0 3,0 76,40
26,5 14,0 1,0 1,0 6,0 1,0 3,0 2,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 1,5 12,0 8,5 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 3,0 1,0 - 2,0 4,5 0,5 4,0 3,0 62,50
43,0 13,0 1,0 1,0 5,0 2,0 3,0 - 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 8,0 13,0 9,0 5-Jan-09 ir@all-logistica.com 1,0 1,0 4,0 1,0 3,0 4,0 1,0 - 3,0 86,00
1,5 13,0 1,0 1,0 6,0 2,0 3,0 1,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - - 2,5 4,0 1,0 1,0 - 3,0 - - 3,0 21,00
28,5 12,0 1,0 1,0 5,0 2,0 3,0 - 5,0 5,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - 2,3 7,5 6,0 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 - 5,0 1,0 4,0 3,0 56,25
26,5 12,0 1,0 1,0 5,0 2,0 3,0 - 5,0 5,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - 4,8 10,0 9,0 5-Jan-09 gmansur@amil.com.br 1,0 1,0 4,0 1,0 3,0 - 4,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 62,25
9,5 8,0 - - 2,0 2,0 - - 5,0 5,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - 3,3 11,0 6,0 5-Jan-09 AMPServices@computershare.com.au
1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 - - 4,0 4,0 3,0 37,75
3,0 9,0 - - 3,0 1,0 - 2,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - - 2,0 1,0 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 - - - - - 15,00
24,5 12,0 1,0 1,0 4,0 2,0 - 2,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 3,3 12,0 8,5 5-Jan-09 corporatecommunications@arcadis.nl
1,0 1,0 3,0 1,0 - 2,0 4,5 0,5 4,0 3,0 60,25
26,0 8,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 2,0 - - 3,0 3,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 8,3 13,0 8,0 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 3,0 3,0 - 4,0 - 4,0 3,0 63,25
28,5 8,5 1,0 1,0 3,5 2,0 1,5 - 2,0 - 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 8,5 3,5 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 - 2,5 0,5 2,0 1,5 51,00
8,0 8,0 1,0 1,0 3,0 2,0 - 1,0 3,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - 2,0 11,0 5,0 8-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 - 4,0 - 4,0 3,0 34,00
34,5 12,0 1,0 1,0 5,0 2,0 3,0 - 5,0 5,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - 6,5 13,0 9,0 5-Jan-09 4823.flavia@bradesco.com.br
1,0 1,0 4,0 1,0 3,0 4,0 - 4,0 3,0 75,00
23,5 12,5 0,5 0,5 5,0 2,0 3,0 - 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 10,0 8,0 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 3,0 3,0 - 4,0 1,0 2,0 3,0 56,00
22,0 7,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 2,0 - - 3,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 - - 9,0 5,0 5-Jan-09 CATABOTE@BANCOLOMBIA.COM.CO
1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 3,0 - 2,0 3,0 43,00
38,3 15,0 1,0 1,0 7,0 2,0 3,0 2,0 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 8,5 11,0 5,5 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 - 4,5 0,5 4,0 3,0 78,25
43,5 10,0 1,0 1,0 2,0 2,0 - - 5,0 5,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 1,0 7,5 14,0 9,0 5-Jan-09 1,0 1,0 3,0 - 3,0 - 5,0 1,0 4,0 3,0 84,00
5
The IR Global Rankings Cycle
IRGR
Registration
Period
Revision and
Evaluation
Update of
Process
IRGR
Best Practices
Benchmark
& Feedback
Report
Reports
Conference
Calls
6
Key IR Global Ranking Points
Individual
Feedback
Reports
Global Benchmark
Transparency
Comparisons
Unique A True
Evaluation
Method and Global Recognition
Ranking System Ranking
7
Summary of the 2010 Edition
8
Breakdown of Participants per Region
Africa Africa
1% 1%
Asia/Pacific
Asia/Pacific North
& 18%
Africa Europe
Europe America
19% 25%
26% 20%
Asia/Pacific
37%
Latin
Latin North
North Latin
America
America America
America
America
34% 19%
36% 20%
21%
Europe
23%
9
Breakdown of Participants per Industry
10
IR Global Rankings 2010
Main Trends
2010 IRGR Highlights
The Scenario: Aftermath of the Crisis
• Risk Perception
– More questioning from investors and analysts;
– Increased demand for information.
• IR Budget
– Tightening budgets;
– Need to deliver results on limited resources.
Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin North Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin North
America America America America
13
2010 IRGR Highlights
Corporate Governance Information
Not only
what, but
HOW it is
structured.
14
2010 IRGR Highlights
Corporate Governance Information
METRO AG
www.metrogroup.de
15
2010 IRGR Highlights
Quarterly Calls & Investors’ Days
Special section for
Investors’ Day: all
presentations, webcasts
and transcripts.
Earnings Release in
(html/pdf); Financials
(html/excel); Conference
Calls Presentations
(pdf/links to webcasts) .
Nexen
www.nexeninc.com
16
2010 IRGR Highlights
Back to basics: implement simple features
• Interactivity
– Financial data in downloadable Excel format;
– Social networks, Web 2.0.
Web 2.0 / Social Media
Interactivity 27%
70% 22%
64% 19%
54% 56% 51%
43% 44% 14% 13%
34% 33% 11%
25% 8% 7%
0% 0%
Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin North Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin America North
America America America
17
2010 IRGR Highlights
Event Centric Charts, Downloadable Files
METRO AG
www.metrogroup.de
18
2010 IRGR Highlights
Social Networks
Social Bookmarking:
linking to main/most
popular social networks
available.
METRO AG
www.metrogroup.de
19
Highlights ASIA
Asian Websites: Opportunities for Improvement
10
15
Timeliness = 5 out of 10
Interactivity = 3 out of 10
15
26
20
Highlights ASIA
• debt Information;
• outlook;
Africa Asia/Pacific Europe Latin North
• slide presentations; America America
• earnings;
Income Statement and Balance
• annual reports; Sheet (Complete Version)
• press releases; 60%
64%
25%
18%
21
Highlights ASIA
China x Asia/Pacific
Guidance / Outlook Presentations/Charts
13% 72%
42%
38%
5%
3%
35%
22
2010 IRGR Highlights
Financial Data (1)
Complete financial data & other info in an
organized simple table.
23
2010 IRGR Highlights
Financial Data (2) and Corporate Governance
Simple and clear info
about each committees’
members.
24
2010 IRGR Highlights
Financial Data (3)
Debt and other Balance Sheet info
breakdown and evolution
K+S Aktiengesellschaft
http://www.k-plus-s.com/en/ir/
25
IRGR Scores x P/E x Mkt.Cap
25,0 5 35,0
Health Care Technology
30,0
20,0 2
1
25,0
3 4 3
Trailing P/E
Trailing P/E
15,0
4 20,0
10,0 15,0
5
2
10,0
5,0
5,0
- -
65,00 70,00 75,00 80,00 85,00 68,0 70,0 72,0 74,0 76,0 78,0 80,0 82,0
IRGR Score - Website Mkt Cap IRGR Score - Website
18,0 Source: Bloomberg, March 2010
16,0 3 Utilities
14,0
2
1
• Small caps, even with smaller budgets,
12,0
can put together an efficient IR
Trailing P/E
10,0 5
8,0 4
Program with solid results;
6,0
• Global standards convergence is likely
4,0
2,0
to prevail over regional or industry
-
characteristics.
67,0 68,0 69,0 70,0 71,0 72,0 73,0
IRGR Score - Website 26
Questions & Answers
Appendix
Key Technical Criteria For IRGR 2010
IR Website Ranking
29
IR Website Ranking
30
Financial Disclosure Ranking
Financial Disclosure
31
Financial Disclosure Ranking
32
Corporate Governance Ranking
Corporate Governance
33
Corporate Governance Ranking
Proxy voting at
shareholders’
meetings
34
Investors’ Choice Ranking
35
Individual Feedback and Best Practices Report
36