What Is MODAPTS?

MODAPTS: Modular Arrangement of Predetermined Time Standards is one of the

Predetermined Motion Time Systems (PMTS), which quantifies and measures the amount
of time needed to complete certain tasks, without the use of a stopwatch. MODAPTS is
based on analyzing the body motions required in a work task or work process. It is an
accurate and quick work analysis system that can be applied to production activities and
non-cycle work environments. MODAPTS is similar to other predetermined time systems
such as Methods- time Measurement (MTM) and Maynard Operation Sequence Technique
(MOST); however MODAPTS uses the MOD as its basic unit of measurement rather than
time measurement units.
Benefits are as follows:
Fast and easy to use
Accurate and Consistent Costs and Results (confidence level at +/-5% at the 95% of the
true mean)
Improved Communication and Productivity
Quick Determination of Rates and Plant/Department Capacity
Quantitative Basis for Analysis of Work Center Design
Awareness on Automated vs Human Interaction Task
Improve Work Ergonomics
Bridge the Gap between Union Representative and Management
Increased Utilization of labor Personnel Management

MODAPTS is equally valuable to firms currently using formalized work measurement

programs, as well as those considering such a program. It puts work measurement
capability in the hands of small firms that do not have the technical staff required for
traditional measurement. In large firms, existing work measurement specialists can use
MODAPTS to increase the effectiveness of standard coverage, and reduce the costs of
standards development.

http://www.triple-a-solutions.com/modapts-course/about-modpats

The first course to be offered is on the MODAPTS work measurement system in setting
time standards.
MODAPTS stands for Modular Arrangement of Predetermined Time Standards. Easily
understood by employers, unions and employees, it provides standards that are transparent
due to having the tasks constructed in such detail and accuracy. This feature of MODAPTS
is so important as it avoids conflict from non-acceptance of standards.
MODAPTS is different from other systems in that it provides time elements for normal
body movements rather than distances moved or the objects being handled.

The MODAPTS work measurement is compatible with other work management and
productivity tools such as Lean Manufacturing, JIT (Just In Time) System and Six Sigma.
MODAPTS is a base analysis tool, producing time- and movement-based studies that can
be applied to any additional work study.
Benefits of MODAPTS include:

Easy to use and quick application for

Contract bidding
Direct labor cost estimating
Quality control
Safety analysis
Establishing productivity standards for work stations and manufacturing
processes

Ergonomics

Work study management

Rapid derivation of objective standards
Increased utilization of work management personnel
Work task analysis regarding people and their capacities
Accuracy and consistency in costing (+/-5% at the 95% confidence level of the true
mean)

Improved communication and productivity, promoting closer teamwork

Quick determination of rates and plant/department capacity
Data and analysis for human systems integration
Building stronger working relationships by defining job tasks and expectations
Using the ergonomic factors built into the MODAPTS system to identify physically
stressful work so that it can be reduced or eliminatedhelping to reduce work-related
injuries and cumulative trauma

Why Does MODAPTS Work?

Simplicity and accuracy. Because MODAPTS is easy to explain and employs a small
number of values, interested parties can review standards quickly and easily, and the
possibility of controversy is greatly reduced. MODAPTS analyses motion patterns and
subjective operator ratings, and its MOD-based system is accurate and easy to interpret.
http://www.eisbrennerpg.com/content/modapts-benefits-results

What is the difference between MOST and MODAPTS?

General Observations: There is negligible difference
between MOST and MODAPTS in overall time, however within the individual
elements there is some disparity. This can be seen on the 'Element Comparrison
Sheet' detailing the individual parts of each pattern. An understanding of disparities
is given below.
(The following is based on a LandRover study taken in Solihull, England.)
Walking: It can be seen in all cases (with the exception of a single step)
that MODAPTS pays considerably higher than the corresponding MOST value.
After discuss with George Miko it is believed that the reason for this lies in the
expected walking speed of an associate. MODAPTS is based on a pace
approximately 3 miles per hour whilst Standard Performance expects an associate
to walk at 4 miles per hour. If this is taken into account the difference in values is
significantly reduced. Another cause of the variance is that MOST splits walking
into ranges (1-2 steps 5-7 steps etc) so an average for the range is paid for
all steps within the range. In the case of MODAPTS the actual number of steps are
paid as a multiple of 1 step.
Reach, Gain Control and Pace: Once again, there is significant variation between
the individual values given by MOST& MODAPTS. In this case however the
reasons are in the way the patterns are applied rather than in a difference in
performance.
To illustrate this successfully, it is necessary to show a full pattern using these
activities;
Operation: Grasp a pen from the desk and place aside in an open drawer (assume
pen is approx 12"" from hand to start).
The MOST pattern would be:
A1G1A1P1 for a total of 40 TMU's and a time value of 0.020 minutes
The MODAPTS pattern would be:
M4G1M4P0 for a total of 9 MODS and a time value of .0194 minutes
A difference of 0.006 minutes
With MODAPTS, an 'M' value is always used with a corresponding 'G' or 'P' and as
such the actual difference between MOSTand MODAPTS becomes negligible.

This is also the case when a walk is involved. For example, if the above operation
entailed a 3 step walk to get and place the pen.
The MOST pattern would be:
A6G1A6P1 for a total of 140 TMU's and time value of 0.07 minutes.
The MODAPTS pattern would be:
3(W5) M2G1 3(W5) M2P0 for a total of 35 MODS and a value of 0.075 minutes
A difference of 0.005 minutes
Once again it can be seen that an 'M' value is placed directly after the walking has
finished whilst the A1 value in the MOSTpattern has been removed.
Therefore, when viewed in isolation there appears to be a large amount of variation
between MOST and MODAPTS concerning Reach, Gain Control & Placement, but
when applied as a complete pattern, the rules regarding payment have a leveling
effect on the overall value.
Other Elements: While only the main movement points
of MODAPTS and MOST have been touched upon there are other elements that
may require some coverage.
Process Time: This item remains the same in both methods. The actual time is
converted into the relevant unit by working backwards i.e. 3 seconds = 10 TMU's
in MOST {(3/60x2000)/10} and 3 seconds = 23.25 MODS
in MODAPTS {(3/60)/.00215}
Bend and Arise: The variance between MOST & MODAPTS is 0.0065 minutes.
Benefits and Concerns: When MODAPTS is used, the step values given indicate the
exact number of steps that the operator takes. This can have both positive and
negative results. In the event of a restudy of the patterns, if the number of steps is
different it can be seen immediately. Conversely, if a different operator with a
shorter or longer stride takes over the operation there could be issues raised on
whether enough or too much has been paid. In MOST, the fact that a range of steps
is paid gives a better chance that an operator of differing stride will be captured
within the range. However, during a restudy only if the walking distance has
changed 'out of' the paid range will it be picked up.
The same is true of arm movements (M). MODAPTS pay 6 values to reach for an
object, ranging from M1 finger movements to M7 trunk assisted
movement. MOST pays an A1 for all movements of the arm. An added benefit

of MODAPTS is the ability to distinguish the actual arm movement as an aid to

restricted associate utilization. If, for example and operator is unable to perform a
type of operation due to injury i.e.. Lift an object with an extended arm, the
patterns can be checked and operations that require extended lifting can be filtered
out. As with MOST, MODAPTS can be used to filter body bends, etc.

http://www.mikopg.com/faq.html
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40092-015-0107-9

Predetermined Time Systems:

Predetermined Time Systems IENG 311 Work Methods Carter J. Kerk, PhD, PE, CSP,
CPE

Predetermined Time Systems:

Predetermined Time Systems PDTS Read Chapter 29 from Konz & Johnson, 6 th Edition

Objectives - PDTS:
Objectives - PDTS Describe the general concept of PDTS Understand the difference
between PDTS and other standard data systems Understand the procedure for calculating
a time standard with PDTS Know the advantages and disadvantages of using a PDTS for
setting time standards

Introduction:
Introduction There are times when it is not possible or practical to set time standards using
time study. You may want to use Standard Data (Chapter 30) or Pre-Determined Time
Systems (This chapter!)

Therbligs:
Therbligs Frank and Lillian Gilbreth took a detailed look at work and broke work into 17
micro-elements, called Therbligs They used Therblig analysis to perform micromotion
analysis of tasks (yes, they did this in the early part of the 1900s) They used it to analyze
bricklaying (a 2000 year-old task) and were able to increase productivity by 300%

Therbligs:
Therbligs G Grasp P Position PP Pre-position U Use A Assemble DA Disassemble RL
Release Load TE Transport Empty TL Transport Loaded SH Search ST Select H Hold UD
Unavoidable Delay AD Avoidable Delay R Rest PN Plan I Inspect

The Concept of PDTS:

The Concept of PDTS Take basic, fundamental, universal units of work Attach standard
amounts of time MTM Methods Time Measurement MOST (Maynard Operational
Sequence Technique) MODAPTS

MTM:
MTM MTM-1: Basic and most detailed version 250 times the cycle time to analyze the task
Simplified Versions of MTM (less accurate) MTM-2: 100 times the cycle time to analyze the
task MTM-3: 35 times the cycle time to analyze the task

MTM - 1:
MTM - 1 Motions are broken into 20 categories Reach, Move, Turn, Apply Pressure,
Grasp, Position, Release, Disengage, Body Motions (leg-foot, horizontal, vertical), Eye
Motions Times for each motion is given in TMUs (see next slide) Times are for
experienced operators working at a normal pace (100%) No allowances are included

MOST:
MOST Maynard Operational Sequence Technique Developed in Sweden by Zandin The
vast majority of activities involved with the handling of an object were associated with a
limited number of motion sequences By taking advantage of this point, the time required to
perform an analysis is significantly reduced from that required by MTM without a
reduction in precision.

MOST:
MOST Four Sequence Models General Move, Controlled Move, Tool Use, Manual Crane
MiniMOST for short-cycle, highly repetitive operations This system requires more time
MaxiMOST For long-cycle times, with many non-identical operations

MOST:
MOST Basic MOST General Move Sequence Three components: Get, Put, Return
Example GET: A1 B0 G1 PUT: A1 B0 P3 RETURN: A1 See next slide for General Move
Model

What is a TMU?:
What is a TMU? TMU: Time Measurement Unit 1 hour = 100,000 TMU 1 minute = 1667
TMU 1 second = 27.78 TMU 0.00001 hour 0.0006 minutes 0.036 seconds

http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/Steven6388-882762-predeterminded-timesystem-study/