Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Review
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 8 September 2014
Received in revised form
3 March 2015
Accepted 12 March 2015
Available online 20 March 2015
Both coal e and biomass-red electric power plants have an enormous negative impact on the environments in which they are situated. However, there is potential to recycle waste such as coal ash and
biomass ash for the production of high-performance concrete, i.e., self-consolidating concrete (SCC). This
innovative high-performance concrete can ow and become compact under its own weight without
segregation. Thus, the need for tamping and vibratory compaction is eliminated, which improves the
production process and the performance of concrete structures. This article reviews SCC in terms of
several aspects, including its history, the processes through which it is produced, and the mix designs
used. The article also discusses the incorporation of four main by-productsdy ash (FA), bottom ash
(BA), rice husk ash (RHA), and sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA)dinto the production of SCC. Due to the rapid
expansion of industrial and agricultural operations, the disposal of by-products such as ash has become
the subject of increasing environmental concern, and their use in the production of SCC constitutes a new
material recycling and sustainability effort. The by-products act as ller materials and can participate in
the pozzolanic reaction associated with cement hydration, often resulting in improved SCC performance.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Fly ash (FA)
Bottom ash (BA)
Electric power plant
Rice husk ash (RHA)
Sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA)
Self-consolidating concrete (SCC)
1. Introduction
Coal and biomass fuels are used in electric power plants
worldwide, and the use of these fuels in this context is growing at a
high rate year by year. Although these fuels are relatively inexpensive and readily available, demand is outstripping supply for
both and prices are increasing. A sound fuel management strategy
designed to maintain the required output power level of power
plants means replacing the main fuels used (lignite, anthracite, and
bituminous fuels) with biomass fuels (rice husk and sugarcane
bagasse fuels). And, given the increasing demand for power, large
quantities of by-products (hereafter referred to as ash) are being
produced and must be properly collected and stored, disposed of, or
used (Khan et al., 2012). Nevertheless, given the limited reach of
environmental rules and regulations, ash is disposed of principally
by dumping it in landlls and reusing it in agriculture. Disposing of
ash in landlls means that heavy metals from the y ash may leach
into the ground, thus leading to a higher risk of contaminated
ground water (Pedersen et al., 2008). Similarly, when incinerated,
rice husk produces a great quantity of ash. Each ton of rice produces
200 kg of rice husks, which on complete combustion produces
40 kg of rice husk ash (RHA). Hence, an adequate handling method
for disposal must be established in order to avoid a negative impact
on the environment (Zerbino et al., 2011). Otherwise, huge quantities of RHA will be wasted and will pose a great threat to the
environment because of the damage caused to the land and the
surrounding areas in which it is dumped (Khan et al., 2012).
Further, sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA) is also disposed of in landlls
(Chusilp et al., 2009a, 2009b; Sua-iam and Makul, 2013a). Ash obtained from power plants is a highly porous material that tends to
have low density. And, in high volume this material can contaminate adjacent soil and underground water. It can, therefore, cause
signicant health problems, which, in turn, give rise to serious
social and environmental problems (Fras et al., 2011). In order to
comprehensively address issues relating to sustainability and
environmental impact, the 3R key principles pertaining to ash
materials and the environment should be taken into consideration,
i.e., reduce, reuse, and recycle. This approach also encompasses (a)
reducing production costs in the electric power, cement, and concrete construction industries, (b) reserving an area for disposal,
thus allowing more land to be put to other uses, (c) realizing benets from the sale of by-products by offsetting processing and
60
disposal costs, and (d) replacing some of the scarce and/or expensive natural resources used in the production of concrete
(Ahmaruzzaman, 2010).
Self-consolidating concrete (SCC) is used widely in many kinds
of construction projects and offers many advantages over standard
concrete mixtures. For example, SCC reduces construction time,
eliminates problems associated with the application of vibration,
and reduces the noise level at construction sites (Okamura and
Ouchi, 2003). According to a study by Zhu (2001), SCC is more
self-leveling in regard to vibration than standard concrete is. In
1996, many European countries adopted this technology and set
specications and standards for SCC. The US, which has also
established standards for the use of SCC, uses the material in areas
such as the precast concrete industry (Ouchi et al., 2003). Further,
the use of SCC, which is a high-performance concrete, entails a
lower vibration level than does the use of other concretes: SCC is
self-compactable and does not lead to either segregation or
excessive bleeding. It should also be noted that the production of
SCC consumes relatively little energy in the process of vibration.
It is widely accepted that the vibration used to compact fresh
concrete into casing releases excess air bubbles and that the extent
of the compaction has a direct inuence on the initial and longterm properties of the concrete. The effect of inadequate vibration on the strength and durability of concrete structures has been
studied by Hoffmann and Leemann (2003). Also, at present, in the
compaction process, the vibrator creates a pressure wave, which
controls the aggregate particles and thereby reduces and overcomes the friction between the cement paste and the aggregates.
This paper presents a literature review of SCC covering a discussion of applications for some important by-products produced
by other industrial processes. The materialsdprincipally y ash
(FA), bottom ash (BA), rice husk ash (RHA), and sugarcane bagasse
ash (SBA)dare used as ller materials and/or for the pozzolanic
reaction and hydration reaction in order to improve the mechanical
properties and durability of SCC.
2. Characteristics of self-consolidating concrete (SCC)
SCC has three main characteristics: (a) the ability to ow under
its own weight without vibration, (b) the ability to ow through
heavily congested reinforcement under its own weight, (c) and the
ability to become homogeneous without the aggregates becoming
segregated. The difference between conventional and selfconsolidating concrete lies in the much greater owability of the
latter. Conventional concrete has a high level of bleeding, which can
be seen from the slump test under ASTM C 143 (American Society
for Testing and Material, 2011a); i.e., the bleeding exceeds
200 mm. SCC has a slump ow under ASTM C 1611 (American
Society for Testing and Material, 2011b) that exceeds 600 mm,
which results in a high level of cohesion and means that the concrete can ow into casing without the application of vibration. In
addition, the viscosity of SCC is sufcient to overcome the friction
between coarse aggregates. This property helps prevent the aggregates from becoming segregated and obstructing ow of the
concrete when poured into the casing. The coarse aggregates and
mortar should not become segregated in SCC.
2.1. Filling ability
According to both the European Federation of National Associations Representing Producers and Applicators of Specialist Building Products for Concrete (EFNARC) (EFNARC, 2002) and the
American Concrete Institute (ACI) (ACI, 2007), SCC has the ability to
ow through heavily congested reinforcement under its own
weight and the ability to become homogeneous without the
61
Table 1
To achieve the lling and passing abilities and segregation resistance of SCC (Tangtermsirikul and Khayat, 2000).
Adequate lling ability
Increase the deformability of the paste
Superplasticizer admixture
Balanced waterepowder ratio
Suitable passing ability
Enhance cohesiveness to reduce aggregate segregation
Low waterepowder ratio
Viscosity agent
Adequate segregation resistance
Reduce separation of solid
Limited aggregate content
Reduce maximum size of aggregates
Low waterepowder ratio
Viscosity agent
62
Fig. 1. Slump ow result for a (a) non-visibly segregated concrete and (b) visibly segregated concrete (Tregger et al., 2012).
low concentration of lime and has at least 10% but no more than
14% calcium oxide (CaO), and (ii) low-quality subbituminous coal or
lignite, which produces ash with a high content of lime and has CaO
content in the range of 15%e40%. The latter kind of coal not only
shows pozzolanic properties, but also has cementitious properties
due to its high lime content (Pederson et al., 2008). In addition,
according to the ASTM standard, Class F FA is composed of silicon
oxide (SiO2), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and iron trioxide (Fe2O3) of
more than 70%, whereas Class C FA is composed of silicon oxide
(SiO2), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), and iron trioxide (Fe2O3) of more
than 50%. Most of the FA particles are solid spheres, although some
are hollow cenospheres. Also present are plerospheres, i.e., spheres
that contain smaller spheres. Ground materials, such as Portland
cement, have solid angular particles. The particle sizes in FA vary
from less than 1 mm (micrometer) to more than 100 mm, with the
typical particle size measuring less than 20 mm. Only 10e30% of the
particles by mass are larger than 45 mm. The surface area is typically
300e500 m2/kg, although FA can have a surface area as low as
200 m2/kg and as high as 700 m2/kg. For FA without close
compaction, the bulk density (the mass per unit volume including
the air between particles) can vary from 540 to 860 kg/m3, whereas
with close-packed storage or vibration, the range can vary from
1120 to 1500 kg/m3 (Kosmatka et al., 2003). However, a serious
weakness with the specication and ndings is that it is easy to
overlook the point that not all FA compositions can react with
Portland cement. In other words, in regard to chemical composition, the classes of FA used as a mineral admixture in Portland
cement concrete can be classied depending on the summation of
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3. This summation can only be calculated based
on a composition that reacts with cement or the effective
Table 2
Guidelines for fresh state properties of SCC.
Properties
Slump ow (mm)
500 mm ow time (s)
V funnel ow time (s)
American concrete
institute (ACI, 2007)
550e650*
e
e
650e800
2e5
8e15
SF2**
550e650 660e750
2 and >2****
8 and 9 to 25****
Powder type
Viscosity type
Combination type
760e850
500e700***
3e20***
3e20***
500e700***
3e25***
3e25***
500e750***
3e20***
3e20***
Remarks.
* Based on the application.
** SF1: Unreinforced or slightly reinforced concrete structures.
** SF2: Normal applications.
** SF3: Applications in very congested structures, structures with complex shapes.
*** The rank of self-compactability, based on the application with a minimum clearance of 35 to >200 mm between reinforcing bars.
**** Based on the viscosity classes expressed by 50 cm ow time and V funnel ow time.
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3. In addition, other classes of FA have irregularshaped particles that have a negative effect on the workability of
high-performance concrete, which means that there is a case for
including a specication for particle shape in the required physical
properties standard (American Society for Testing and Materials,
2011).
The chemical composition of FA includes silicon dioxide (SiO2),
alumina oxide (Al2O3), calcium oxide (CaO), iron trioxide (Fe2O3),
magnesium oxide (MgO), titanium oxide (TiO2), sulde trioxide
(SO3), sodium oxide (Na2O), and potassium oxide (K2O). Also
included is carbon content, expressed in terms of loss on ignition
(LOI). Class C FA has a high ratio of CaO and MgO, whereas its ratio
of SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3 is low compared with that of Class F FA. It
has been conrmed that carbon is the most important composition
of LOI. FA with an LOI of 3.60e9.34% by weight has a high LOI,
leading to a low elasticity modulus, which is attributed to a high
water demand and consequently reduced compressive strength
(Wesche, 1991). Thus, it would be worthwhile to more extensively
investigate the effects of the LOI threshold on cement and concrete,
e.g., on the characteristics of unburnt carbon when incorporated
into cement mixtures. The mineralogical composition of FA, which
depends on geological factors related to the formation and deposition of coal and its combustion conditions, can be established by
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. The dominant mineral phases are
quartz, kaolinite, illite, and siderite. The less predominant minerals
in unreacted coals include calcite, pyrite, and hematite. Quartz and
mullite are the major crystalline constituents of low-calcium FA,
whereas high-calcium FA consists of quartz, tri-calcium aluminate
(3CaO,Al2O3), calcium silicate (CaO,SiO2), and tri-calcium alumino-silicate (4CaO,Al2O3,SO4) (Ahmaruzzaman, 2010). An
important focus of the present study contemporary technical review is the present technical feasibility of using FA in the cement
industry as a partial replacement for cement, as pozzolanic material
in the production of pozzolanic cement, and as a set retarder with
cement. Ahmaruzzaman's study establishes that using FA to replace
cement in concrete has a number of advantages such as effecting a
lower water demand and a lower waterecementitious materials
ratio, improving the packing of the particles, decreasing air content,
and increasing long-term strength development. Also, in terms of
toxicity, all the trace metals analyzed (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Se, As, and Zn)
fall well within the specied concentration levels in regard to
leaching from the FA (Zhang et al., 1999). However, the review does
not address how to use or enhance Class C FA in the production of
high-strength, high-performance concrete.
SCC generally contains a large amount of powder material and
superplasticizer supplemented by mineral admixtures. FA has often
been used successfully as a secondary raw material in SCC. The use
of FA also reduces the demand for cement and eliminates the need
for viscosity-enhancing chemical admixtures. Also, the use of FA
improves the rheological properties and durability of concrete
(Dinakar et al., 2008). Based on Dinakar's work, it would be effective to use a high volume of FA to produce SCC: for example, SCC of a
relatively low strength (20e30 MPa) can be prepared by replacing
FA at about 70e85% by weight. Also, high-volume SCC shows
remarkably less weight loss and less chloride ion diffusion than
lu et al. (2006) showed
does low-volume SCC. In addition, Felekog
that the superior workability of SCC as compared with that of
standard concrete can be explained in reference to the spherical
shape of FA particles, which allows the particles to easily roll over
one another thereby reducing the friction between them. The
spherical shape also minimizes the particles' surfaceevolume ratio,
lu's paper
resulting in low uid demands. Furthermore, Felekog
lu et al., 2006) offers important evidence for viscosity-loss
(Felekog
rates and durability properties. And, the next steps in extending his
research involve investigating the optimal content of limestone as a
63
64
Table 3
Compressive and splitting tensile strength of SCC mixes (Siddique, 2011).
FA replacement (% wt.)
15
20
25
30
35
7 days
28 days
90 days
365 days
28 days
90 days
365 days
29.55
27.99
25.52
23.98
22.78
35.19
33.15
31.47
30.66
29.62
58.99
52.86
43.77
41.96
40.88
61.24
54.60
46.67
44.84
43.73
2.40
2.12
1.83
1.76
1.55
2.68
2.33
2.12
1.97
1.76
2.96
2.61
2.33
2.26
2.12
65
Table 4
Fresh and hardened properties of SCC mixes containing FA (Liu, 2010).
Properties
Fresh state
Slump ow (mm)
720
V-funnel time (s)
8.1
J-ring spread (mm)
665
Step height
11
of J-ring (mm)
Segregation index (%)
11
Hardened state
Compressive strength (MPa)
28 days
73.3
90 days
79.0
Splitting strength (MPa)
28 days
5.5
90 days
5.9
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (km/s)
28 days
4.91
90 days
4.93
Dynamic elastic modulus (GPa)
28 days
48
90 days
49
Sorptivity (kg/m2h0.5)
90 days
0.24
20
40
60
80
100
700
8.1
620
16
705
6.1
610
15
715
6.3
550
20
730
7.2
485
23
715
9.1
500
22
13
13
13
69.7
78.0
58.5
63.0
37.2
49.3
16.0
26.1
e
e
5.5
6.0
4.2
5.6
3.3
4.2
1.8
2.3
e
e
4.89
4.93
4.71
4.75
4.56
4.65
4.35
4.43
e
e
47
49
0.26
44
46
0.18
39
42
0.37
31
34
0.63
e
e
e
66
Table 5
Physical properties of BA compared with physical properties of ne aggregate (sand).
Physical properties
Specic gravity
Water absorption (%)
Porosity (%)
Fineness modulus
Maximum size (mm)
a
Bottom ash
Sand
Bottom ash
Sand
Bottom ash
Sand
Bottom ash
Sand
1.5(SSD)
30.1(1eh)
e
e
e
2.72(SSD)
1.0(1eh)
e
e
e
1.67
e
e
1.6
2.4
2.63
e
e
2.5
2.4
1.87(SSD)
5.45
10.19
2.36
e
2.55(SSD)
0.08
1.22
2.34
e
1.39
31.58
e
1.37
17.19%a
2.60
2.46
e
1.97
5.24%a
10
20
30
28.9
39.5
45.3
2.12
2.26
2.54
748
509
2.50
2.27
25.8
36.2
41.8
1.90
2.05
2.26
830
573
2.70
2.42
67
68
69
Table 7
Chemical compositions of RHA by country.
Composition (%)
USA
(Sensale et al., 2008)
India
(Ganesan et al., 2007)
Brazil
(Cordeiro et al., 2009a)
Vietnam
(Van et al., 2013)
Thailand
(Sua-iam and Makul, 2014)
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
LOI
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3
88.00
e
0.10
0.80
0.20
e
8.10
88.10
87.32
0.22
0.28
0.48
0.28
e
2.10
87.82
82.60
0.40
0.50
0.80
0.70
e
11.90
83.50
87.40
0.40
0.30
0.90
0.60
0.40
4.60
88.10
93.44
0.21
0.18
0.76
0.43
0.16
1.27
94.72
Table 8
Comparison of the cost analyses of SCC mixes (Memon et al., 2011).
Materials
Cement (kg)
Coarse aggregate (kg)
Sand (kg)
Superplasticizer, Sikament NM (L)
Superplasticizer, Viscocretee1 (L)
RHA hauling cost**
Total
Percentage reduction in cost ~37
0.0495
0.0061
0.0050
0.6429
3.2143
e
Quantity
Cost (USD)*
Quantity
Cost (USD)*
500
750
875
17.5
10
e
24.75
4.575
4.375
11.25
32.14
500
750
875
22
e
0.50
24.75
4.575
4.375
14.14
0.50
48.34
77.09
Table 9
Fresh properties of SCC mixes containing RHA (Sauddin et al., 2012).
RHA* (%)
0
15
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
15
20
W/c**
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.40
0.40
0.40
Filling ability
Passing ability
Segregation resistance
Inverted slump ow
Rating
Flow spread
(mm)
Flow
time (s)
Flow spread
(mm)
Different ow
(mm)
Stability
VSI***
680
715
725
655
660
675
690
680
700
710
615
650
660
3.8
5.1
6.2
2.9
3.2
3.6
3.9
5.1
5.4
5.8
2.3
2.6
2.8
660
700
710
640
645
655
665
660
670
675
595
630
645
20
15
15
15
15
20
25
20
30
35
20
20
15
Highly stable
Unstable
Highly unstable
Highly stable
Highly stable
Stable
Unstable
Unstable
Highly unstable
Highly unstable
Highly stable
Stable
Stable
0
2
3
0
0
1
2
2
3
3
0
1
1
* cement replacement by weight, **waterecementitious materials ratio, *** Visual stability index.
5.7
5.3
5.7
5.3
5.5
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.6
5.2
6.1
5.2
5.3
2325
2280
2260
2315
2310
2310
2290
2280
2255
2255
2275
2280
2260
70
10
15
20
25
30
4.54
3.56
1486
4.53
3.64
438
4.1
3.43
389
3.93
3.31
306
3.92
4.06
876
4.47
6.41
904
4.92
9.20
1089
71
Table 11
Fresh and hardened properties of high volume y ash of SCC mixes containing unground RHA as a replacement for ne aggregate (Sua-iam and Makul, 2013b).
Properties
Fresh properties
Slump ow (cm)
Slump ow time (s)
Blocking assessmenta
V-funnel ow time (s)
Hardened properties
Compressive strength (MPa)
28 days
91 days
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (km/s)
28 days
91 days
10
20
40
60
80
100
70
6
No
7
69
6
No
9
70
6
Minimal
11
70
7
Minimal
14
70
8
Extreme
n/a
60
15
Extreme
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
65
82.8
54.8
72.6
28.0
39.6
19.1
26.4
10.4
14.8
4.1
5.7
2.0
2.6
4.4
5.2
4.2
5.0
3.5
4.2
2.2
3.0
1.8
2.6
0.9
1.3
0.7
1.0
a
The blocking assessment criteria conformed to ASTM C1621 (2011), in which 0e25 mm is dened as no visible blocking, 25e50 mm is dened as minimal to noticeable
blocking, and greater than 50 mm is dened as noticeable to extreme blocking (n/a indicates not measurable).
72
Table 12
Chemical composition of sugarcane bagasse ash (SBA) by country.
Composition (%)
India
(Singh et al., 2000)
Brazil
(Cordeiro et al., 2009)
Pakistan
(Akram et al., 2009)
Mexico
nez-Quero et al., 2013)
(Jime
Thailand
(Sua-iam and Makul, 2013a)
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
LOI
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3
63.16
9.70
5.40
8.40
2.90
2.87
6.90
78.26
78.34
8.55
3.61
2.15
1.65
e
0.42
90.50
62.44
6.74
5.77
6.16
2.97
0.72
2.58
74.95
56.37
14.61
5.04
2.36
1.43
e
10.53
76.02
65.26
6.91
3.65
4.01
1.10
0.21
15.34
75.82
Table 13
Chemical composition of as-received SBA and ground SBA with different LOI
(Chusilp et al., 2009b).
Composition (%)
Bagasse
ash (%)
LOI-10
LOI-15
LOI-20
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
Cao
MgO
SO3
LOI
SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3
54.10
5.69
3.54
15.37
1.41
0.03
19.36
63.33
77.37
3.59
4.66
7.81
1.32
0.15
5.08
85.62
70.64
3.68
4.06
10.68
1.41
0.15
9.29
78.38
60.67
4.30
4.02
15.85
1.46
0.09
13.59
68.99
54.45
6.06
3.23
15.41
1.37
0.04
19.39
63.74
73
6. Environmental acceptability
Cementitious materials initially act as a mechanical barrier
preventing activated water ow through the waste for a long
period, and thus contributing to the retardation of dissolved radionuclides via a combination of physical and chemical interactions
(El-Dakroury and Gasser, 2008). The disposal of metal-laden FA,
though, is a problem. This substance can be incorporated into a
cementitious mixture to a great extent without risking an unacceptable delay to the cement setting or excess heavy metals
leaching from the solidied products. When used in concrete, FA
reacts chemically with cement and reduces any leaching effect
(Ahmaruzzaman, 2010). It is possible to prepare mortars with 10%
metal-laden FA that are as strong as or even stronger than cement
alone. Leachates from xed metal-laden FA, obtained by using both
the ASTM and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency extraction
procedure (USEPA-EP) leaching tests, exhibit metal concentrations
lower than those specied in the drinking water standards set by
the World Health Organization (WHO) (Weng and Huang, 1994).
Table 16 shows the results of the TCLP analysis. The TCLP concentrations that leached from the cement paste samples in which class
C y ash had been used as a 50% substitution for cement, lead to a
solidication with the cement-y ash mixture, which showed
slightly less leaching compared to the cement binder. The average
efciency for immobilizing lead contained waste by a cement-only
binder system was 98% (for lead nitrate concentrations of up to
10%). In treating similar waste, the addition of y ash in cementbased S/S slightly increased the efciency (Wang and
Vipulanandan, 1996). In addition, the leachability of heavy metals
from solidied wastes using reactive RHA-blended cement as solidication metal-containing wastes was investigated by Asavapisit
and Ruengrit (2005). Metal leaching from the solidied waste
samples was assessed using the toxicity characteristic leaching
procedure (TCLP) as set out by the US EPA (United States
Environmental Protection Agency, 1992) on samples cured for 28
days. When OPC was replaced with RHA, the acid neutralization
capacity of cement-based solidied wastes was reduced. The concentration of heavy metals in the TCLP leachates was very low due
to the high resultant leachate pHs, and the plating sludge can be
loaded at 30% wt. to the cement blended with 10% wt. It was
observed that the leachability of heavy metals increased as the
waste loading increased. The concentration of heavy metals,
especially of chromium, in leachates does not exceed the TCLP
limits (5 mg/L). RHA resulted in either the minimum acceptable 28day strength or the maximum level of metal leaching allowed for
landlling.
The cumulative fractional release (CFR) data show a decrease in
the Cs leachability of a cement formulation concomitant with RHA.
The addition of RHA tends to result in mixes that can immobilize
the Cs. As RHA is known to have a sorption capacity for anions, the
Table 14
Comparison of the cost analyses of SCC mixes (Akram et al., 2009).
Materials
Cement (kg)
Coarse aggregate (kg)
Sand (kg)
Superplasticizer, Sikament NM (L)
Superplasticizer, Viscocrete (L)
Bagasse ash (kg)
Total
Percentage reduction in cost ~36
*USD/PKR 0.00989.
0.0593
0.0019
0.0010
0.6824
2.4453
Free of cost
Quantity
Cost (USD)
Quantity
Cost (USD)
500
750
875
12.5
10
e
29.65
1.425
0.875
8.530
24.45
500
750
875
14.375
e
75
29.65
1.425
0.875
9.810
64.93
41.76
74
Table 15
Compressive strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity of SCC mixes containing unground SBA as a replacement for ne aggregate (Sua-iam and Makul, 2013a).
Properties
Fresh properties
Slump ow (cm)
Slump ow time (s)
Blocking assessmenta
V-funnel ow time (s)
Compressive strength (MPa)
28 days
91 days
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (km/h)
28 days
91 days
10
20
40
60
80
100
70
6
No
8
69
7
No
9
70
8
Minimal
14
70
7
Minimal
22
70
6
Extreme
31
68
5
Extreme
40
68
4
Extreme
52
65.0
82.8
49.4
62.2
35.0
49.1
28.3
41.3
23.2
31.6
12.7
18.1
n/a
n/a
15,840
18,720
13,248
15,120
12,348
14,112
10,872
13,032
9540
10,944
7272
8676
n/a
n/a
a
The blocking assessment criteria conformed to ASTM C1621 (2011), in which 0e25 mm is dened as no visible blocking, 25e50 mm is dened as minimal to noticeable
blocking, and greater than 50 mm is dened as noticeable to extreme blocking (n/a indicates not measurable).
Table 16
Heavy metal concentrations in TCLP leachates of cement formulation concomitant with y ash and rice husk ash.
Cement substitution (%)
Pb
Fly ash (Wang and Vipulanandan, 1996)
0FA 0.5%Pb
0.55
0FA 2.0%Pb
2.5
0FA 10.0%Pb
30
50FA 0.5%Pb
0.45
50FA 2.0%Pb
2.0
50FA 10.0%Pb
25
Fe
Zn
1.3
2.2
2.6
3.7
4.1
4.4
3.6
3.2
2.5
3.7
2.8
2.2
Remark: FA y ash, Pb lead nitrate, R rice husk ash, Cr chromium hydroxide, Fe ferric hydroxide, and Zn zinc hydroxide, and PS plating sludge.
75
Ganesan, K., Rajagopal, K., Thangavel, K., 2007. Evaluation of bagasse ash as supplementary cementitious material. Cem. Concr. Compos 29, 515e524.
Girish, S., Ranganath, R.V., Vengala, J., 2010. Inuence of powder and paste on ow
properties of SCC. Constr. Build. Mater. 24, 2481e2488.
Hamad, M.A., Khattab, I.A., 1981. Effect of the combustion process on the structure
of rice hull silica. Thermochim. Acta 48, 343e349.
Heidrich, C., Feuerborn, H.J., Weir, A., 2013. Coal combustion products: a global
perspective. In: World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference, Kentucky, United States
of America.
ndez, J.F.M., Middendorf, B., Gehrke, M., Budelmann, H., 1998. Use of wastes of
Herna
the sugar industry as pozzolana in lime-pozzolana binders: study of the reactions. Cem. Conc. Res. 28, 1525e1536.
Hoffmann, C., Leemann, A., 2003. Homogeneity of structures made with selfconsolidating concrete and conventional concrete. In: 3rd International RILEM
Symposium on Self-consolidating Concrete, Reykjavik, Iceland.
nez-Quero, V.G., Leo
n-Martnez, F.M., Montes-Garca, P., Gaona-Tiburcio, C.,
Jime
n-Nava, J.G., 2013. Inuence of sugar-cane bagasse ash and y ash on the
Chaco
rheological behavior of cement pastes and mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 40,
691e701.
Japanese Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE), 2007. Standard Specications for Concrete Structureematerial and Construction. In: JSCE Guidelines for Concrete No.
16 (Tokyo, Japan).
Kannan, V., Ganesan, K., 2014. Chloride and chemical resistance of self compacting
concrete containing rice husk ash and metakaolin. Constr. Build. Mater. 51,
225e234.
Kasemchaisiri, R., Tangtermsirikul, S., 2008. Properties of self-consolidating concrete in corporating bottom ash as a partial replacement of ne aggregate. Sci.
Asia 34, 87e95.
Khan, R., Jabbar, A., Ahmad, I., Khan, W., Khan, A.N., Mirza, J., 2012. Reduction in
environmental problems using rice-husk ash in concrete. Constr. Build. Mater.
30, 360e365.
Khatib, J.M., 2008. Performance of self-consolidating concrete containing y ash.
Constr. Build. Mater. 22, 1963e1971.
Khayat, K.H., 1999. Workability, testing, and performance of self-consolidating
Concrete. ACI Mater. J. 96, 346e354.
Kim, H.K., Lee, H.K., 2011. Use of power plant bottom ash as ne and coarse aggregates in high-strength concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 1115e1122.
Kismi, M., Saint-Arroman, J.C., Mounanga, P., 2012. Minimizing water dosage of
superplasticized mortars and concretes for a given consistency. Constr. Build.
Mater. 28, 747e758.
Kosmatka, S.H., Kerkhoff, B., Panarese, W.C., 2003. Design and Control of Concrete
Mixtures, fourteenth ed. Portland Cement Association, Skokie, Illinois, United
States of America.
Libre, N.A., Khoshnazar, R., Shekarchi, M., 2010. Relationship between uidity and
stability of self-consolidating mortar incorporating chemical and mineral admixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 24, 1261e1272.
Liu, M., 2010. Self-consolidating concrete with different levels of pulverized fuel
ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 24, 1245e1252.
Loh, Y.R., Sujan, D., Rahmana, M.E., Das, C.A., 2013. Sugarcane bagasse e the future
composite material: a literature review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl 75, 14e22.
Makul, N., Agrawal, D.K., 2010. Microwave (2.45 GHz)-assisted rapid sintering of
SiO2-rich rice husk ash. Mater. Lett. 64, 367e370.
Mehta, P.K., 1978. Siliceous ashes and hydraulic cements prepared there from.
Patent no. 4105459, U. S. A.
Memon, S.A., Shaikh, M.A., Akbar, H., 2011. Utilization of Rice husk ash as viscosity
modifying agent in self compacting Concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 25,
1044e1048.
Montakarntiwong, K., Chusilp, N., Tangchirapat, W., Jaturapitakkul, C., 2013.
Strength and heat evolution of concretes containing bagasse ash from thermal
power plants in sugar industry. Mater. Des. 49, 414e420.
Muthadhi, A., Kothandaraman, S., 2010. Optimum production conditions for reactive rice husk ash. Mater. Struct. 43, 1303e1315.
Naik, T.R., Kumar, R., Ramme, B.W., Canpolat, F., 2012. Development of highstrength, economical self-consolidating concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 30,
463e469.
Nair, D.G., Jagadish, K.S., Fraaij, A., 2006. Reactive pozzolanas from rice husk ash: an
alternative to cement for rural housing. Cem. Concr. Res. 36, 1062e1071.
Okamura, H., 1997. Self-compacting high performance concrete. ACI Concr. Int. 19
(7), 50e54.
Okamura, H., Ouchi, M., 2003. Application of self-consolidating concrete in Japan.
In: 3rd International RILEM Symposium on Self-consolidating Concrete, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Ouchi, M., Nakamura, S.A., Osterberg, T., Hallberg, S.E., Lwin, M., 2003. Applications
of self-consolidating concrete in Japan, Europe and the united states. In: 5th
International Symposium High Performance Computing-ISHPC, Tokyo, Japan.
Pathak, N., Siddique, R., 2012. Properties of self-compacting-concrete containing y
ash subjected to elevated temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 30, 274e280.
Pedersen, K.H., Jensen, A.D., Skjth-Rasmussen, M.S., Dam-Johansen, K., 2008.
A review of the interference of carbon containing y ash with air entrainment
in concrete. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 34, 135e154.
Rahman, M.E., Muntohar, A.S., Pakrashi, V., Nagaratnam, B.H., Sujan, D., 2014. Self
compacting concrete from uncontrolled burning of rice husk and blended ne
aggregate. Mater. Des. 55, 410e415.
Ravindrarajah, R.S., Siladyi, D., Adamopoulos, B., 2003. Development of highstrength self-consolidating concrete with reduced segregation potential. In:
76
Sua-iam, G., Makul, N., 2013b. Utilization of limestone powder to improve the
properties of self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of
untreated rice husk ash as ne aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 38,
455e464.
Sua-iam, G., Makul, N., 2014. Utilization of high volumes of unprocessed lignite-coal
y ash and rice husk ash in self-consolidating concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 78,
184e194.
Tangtermsirikul, S., Khayat, K.H., 2000. Fresh Concrete Properties. Report 23: Selfconsolidating Concrete e State-of-the-art Report of RILEM Technical Committee 174-SCC. RILEM Publications, Bagneux, France.
Tantawy, M.A., El-Roudi, A.M., Salem, A.A., 2012. Immobilization of Cr(VI) in bagasse
ash blended cement pastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 30, 218e223.
Tregger, N., Gregori, A., Ferrara, L., Shah, S., 2012. Correlating dynamic segregation of
self-consolidating concrete to the slump-ow test. Constr. Build. Mater. 28,
499e505.
Tuan, N.V., Ye, G., Breugel, K.V., Fraaij, A.L.A., Dai, B.D., 2011. The study of using rice
husk ash to produce ultra high performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater 25,
2030e2035.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1992. Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure. EPA Test Method 1311. Washington, DC, United States of
America.
Uysal, M., Yilmaz, K., Ipek, M., 2012. Properties and behavior of self-consolidating
concrete produced with GBFS and FA additives subjected to high temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 28, 321e326.
ler, C., Bui, D.D., Ludwig, H.M., 2013. Mesoporous structure and
Van, V.T.A., Ro
pozzolanic reactivity of rice husk ash in cementitious system. Constr. Build.
Mater. 43, 208e216.
Wang, S.Y., Vipulanandan, C., 1996. Leachability of lead from solidied cement-y
ash binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 26, 895e905.
Weng, C.H., Huang, C.P., 1994. Treatment of metal industrial wastewater by y ash
and cement xation. J. Environ. Eng 120 (6), 1470e1487.
Wesche, K., 1991. Fly Ash in Concrete: Properties and Performance. Chapman & Hall,
London, United Kingdom.
Xie, Y., Liu, B., Yin, J., Zhou, S., 2002. Optimum mix parameters of high-strength selfconsolidating concrete with ultrapulverized y ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 32,
477e480.
Yahia, A., Tanimura, M., Shimoyama, Y., 2005. Rheological properties of highly
owable mortar containing limestone ller-effect of powder content and W/C
ratio. Cem. Concr. Res. 35, 532e539.
Yu, Q., Nagataki, T.S., Linc, J., Saeki, T., Hisada, M., 2005. The leachability of heavy
metals in hardened y ash cement and cement-solidied y ash. Cem. Concr.
Res. 35, 1056e1063.
Zain, M.F.M., Islam, M.N., Mahmud, F., Jamil, M., 2011. Production of rice husk ash for
use in concrete as a supplementary cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater.
25, 798e805.
n, B., Garcia, T., Agullo
, L., Gettu, R., 2009. Workability tests and
Zerbino, R., Barraga
rheological parameters in self-consolidating concrete. Mater. Struct. 42,
947e960.
Zerbino, R., Giaccio, G., Isaia, G.C., 2011. Concrete incorporating rice-husk ash
without processing. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 371e378.
Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, X., Chen, Y., Qi, T., 1999. Recovery of heavy metals from
electroplating sludge and stainless steel pickle waste liquid by ammonia
leaching method. J. Environ. Sci. China 11 (3), 381e384.
Zhu, W., Gibbs, J.C., Bartos, P.J.M., 2001. Uniformity of in situ properties of selfconsolidating concrete in full-scale structural elements. Cem. Concr. Compos.
23, 57e64.