Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Biol.
Chem.,
44
(12),
Determination
2943`2949,
1980
of Glucose
2943
by a Modification
of Somogyi-Nelson
Method
Chitoshi HATANAKA
and Yoshiaki KOBARA
Departmentof AppliedBiochemistry,
Facultyof AppliedBiologicalScience,
HiroshimaUniversity,
Fukuyama720,Japan
ReceivedJuly 18, 1980
Nelson'sarsenomolybdate,the chromogenicreagent in Somogyi-Nelsonmethod, was
replaced by Folin-Ciocalteuphenol reagent. The major object was to remove the toxic
arsenic compoundsfrom the color reaction system. The color-producingability of the
phenolreagentwasconsiderablylowerthan that of Nelson'sreagent. However,the modified
methodwas favorablycomparableto Somogyi-Nelsonmethodin simplicity,reproducibility
and stability of color development. The error in both the modifiedand Somogyi-Nelson
methodcould be reducedto about one fourth by addingsodium benzoate(finalconcentra
tion, about 0.5%)to the test solutions.
The
arsenomolybdate
developed
still
by
being,
reagent
The
in
widely
for
reducing
reagent
Nelson1)
used
the
by
for
as
was
been,
the
and
determination
of
use
is probably
of
that
Nelson's
this
special
or
Chromogenic
compared
with
reagents
more
which
stable
nation
the
had
and
with
agents.1)
other
from
Katayama
2 N
been
of
This
far,
high
produces
reagent
deionized
a concentration
re
was
disadvantage.
The
to
present
and
by
Nelson's
eliminate
amount
of
ably
in
comparable
stability
to
of
the
color
replaced
reagent3)
is
Somogyi-Nelson
favor
method1)
developed
and
repro
ducibility.
from
out
Glucose
of
Nakarai
further
Chemicals
purification.
crystallized)
and
~ crystallized)
preparation
was from
from
were
maltose
Ltd.,
Kyoto,
Bovine
chicken
from
egg-white
Sigma
Chemical
were
Industries
grade)
used
albumin
lysozyme
Chemical
of glucoamylase
(NK-113,
Nagase
Sangyo
Co., Osaka.
Katayama
(special
serum
Co.
with
(1~
(3
A crude
1~104 GUN/g)
Other chemicals,
Co.,
latter
or
acidity
20-fold
acid
of the
0.1,
of
diluted
0.5
concentration
Table
so
I;
the
as
to
or 1
of
volume
of
contain
N.
the
re
each
an
equal
reagent.
reagent.
prepared
The
and
used
1937
with
reagent
the
of
modifications
Nelson.1)
Osaka,
were
glucoamylase
(500mg)
pended
in
room
stirred
temperature
5C
was
measured
paper.
The
at
acetate
volume
stopped
by
copper
of
reagent
present
method
method
the
) The
absorption
and
to
with
assay
buffer
of
the
0.5ml
reducing
the
with
obtained
those
glucoamylase
activity
was
by
was
and
0.5ml.
reaction
Somogyi's
results
4.8)
104g/ml).
the
power
compare
pH
mixture
of
filtrate
containing
protein,
period
at
Roshi
of the
(50mM,
reaction
a definite
The
1 hr
a Toyo
system
(as
sus
4.8.
about
activity
an
prepa
was
pH
for
filtered
enzyme
the
for
addition
order
iodometric
in
crude
3.2.1.3.)
buffer,
glucoamylase
of the
incubation
acetate
then
35
amount
The
(EC.
occasionally
and
(0.8mM),
total
activity.
glucoamylase
of 0.2M
was
No.
In
of
100ml
suspension
The
METHODS
and
the
chromogenic
by
Assay
After
Chemicals.
the
10-
hydrochloric
final
selected
copper
a suitable
AND
4-,
approximately
see
was
was
maltose
MATERIALS
the
of
acidity
the
Somogyi4)
in
was
phenol
2-,
a dilute
purchased
Co.;
this
modification
arsenomolybdate
Folin-Ciocalteu
its
reagent
ration
which
or
that
became
recommended
undertaken
diluted
combinations
Alkaline
serious
problem.
work
were
Industries
was
water
reagent
the
diluted
contains
is
acid)
with
agent
combi
copper
toxicity
in
arsenomolybdate
reagents
Chemical
such
For
in
alkaline
Nelson's
which
environmental
so
colors
Somogyi's
However,
arsenic
used
Nelson's
phenol
reagent,
phosphomolybdate
reproducible
grade.
reagent.
Folin-Ciocalteu
phenol
as
guaranteed
and
(about
method.1,2)
extensive
of
is
chromogenic
Somogyi-Nelson
the
arsenomolybdate
which
has
quantitative
sugars
reason
1944
was
was
alkaline
determined.
obtained
by
another
standard
assayed
by
the
the
method.5
amount
of
method.6)
protein
was
determined
by
the
UV
2944
TABLE I.
a A commercial
reagent was diluted with water or a dilute
The values of N are approximate .
Measurement
of
procedure
In
of
a test
tions
tube
0.5ml
tubes
for
20min1,4)
running
less
in
fourfold
and
with
1 mol
of
5ml
water
in
and
reagent.
The
and
heated
cooling
0.5
with
in
reagent
N in
solutions
acid)
were
absorbances
cell
solu
mixed
phenol
about
their
test
was
After
resultant
10-mm
follows:
the
marbles
water.
water,
The
of
660nm
copper
glass
standard
as
glucose
Folin-Ciocalteu
with
stirred.
of
of
alkaline
with
boiling
2ml
The
is
0.5ml
than
covered
water,
added
power.
modification
(16.5~165mm),
were
(diluted
reducing
present
of Somogyi's
test
at
the
containing
with
was
In
the
case
of the
determination
the
reactions
were
described
by
procedure
was
test
Nelson,1)
was
alkaline
copper
cooling,
0.5ml
and
the
11ml
to
124
reagent
and
scale
heated
of
for
solution
same
tube
the
of
the
After
was
added
diluted
used
Somogyi's
20min.
was
was
as
of
0.5ml
0.5ml
arsenomolybdate
colored
The
essentially
the
Namely,
with
of Nelson's
water.
Somogyi-Nelson
out
that
half.
mixed
resultant
of
except
reduced
solution
by
carried
read
Type
spectrophotometer.
method,
acid.
diluted
were
Hitachi
hydrochloric
as
with
described
above.
RESULTS
Effect
of
the
phenol
concentration
reagent
on
of
the
Folin-Ciocalteu
calibration
curve
of
glucose
Alterations
reagent
effect
of
the
found
the
linearlity
glucose
straight
phenol
concentration
to
have
of
the
and
F,
of
passed
however,
cuprous
reagent
of
no
all
through
curves
the
(diluted
by
20-fold
curves
the
dissolving
oxide
the
appreciable
calibration
(0`1.8mol/ml);
procedure
cipitates
the
was
on
were
In
in
with
1.
Absorption
with
Folin-Ciocalteu
The
values
Spectra
of the
Phenol
Reagent.
Colors
Developed
origin.
the
mixing
FIG.
pre
with
water,
tration
a Hitachi
see
text.)
in
parentheses
(mol/ml).
Type
The
340
show
spectra
spectrophotometer.
the
were
glucose
determined
(For
concen
with
details
Modified
and,
a
upon
few
mixing,
broad
The
spectrum
500nm,
was
for
solutions
mol/ml)
to
the
800nm
at
observed
Effect
of
intervals
any
wavelengths
wavelengths
from
1.2,
1.6
repeatedly
in
2.0
5 hr
400
but
absorbances
(Fig.
on
five
and
from
for
their
the
above
no
were
1).
calibration
curve
absorbance
at
glucose
The
given
relation
was
absorption
lines,
between
wavelength
glucose
the
determined
except
following
the
and
spectra
passed
of
scanned
2945
absorption
produced
0.8,
changes
at
of
colors
the
Method
in
giving
region
stable;
30-min
maximum
color,
visible
(0.4,
were
detectable
the
quite
glucose
its
resultant
in
spectra
reached
seconds.
Somogyi-Nelson
only
through
in
on
Fig.
one
the
concentration
the
1.
All
determined
origin
experiments
we
(Fig.
used
basis
of
the
straight
FIG. 3.
at
800nm,
2).
a
a
of
In
the
the
wavelength
Curves
obtained by Somogyi-Nelson
see text.)
660nm.
Calibration
was
considerably
lower
than
that
of
of Glucose
method.
Determined
(For
details
2946
Table
Glucose
blank
fering
amount
presence
amount
of the substances
was determined
absorbance
substances
II.
were expressed
from
on
both
methods.
the
the
absorbance
obtained
by subtracting
the cor
responding
blank absorbance
from that of the
mixed solution of glucose and interfering
sub
stance.
Both methods
were found to suffer
by each of the buffers
TABLE
III.
EFFECT
OF THE
Test
2.0,
3.0
solutions
or
water;
the
except
those
were
4.0ml
final
of
of
5%
prepared
sodium
concentration
the
The average
errors,
values
as
follows:
benzoate
of the
are
OF SODIUM
PRESENT
AND
To
benzoate
expressed
of triplicates.
as
being
the
of glucose
BENZOATE
by subtracting
and interfering
ON THE
SOMOGYI-NELSON
a glucose
solution
obtained
.
the corresponding
substance.
In the
of the interfering
substances,
of glucose was determined
from
the absorbance
and
0.25,
absorbance
solution
the
mixture
0.50,
at
1.00,
660nm.
REPRODUCIBILITY
METHODS
(1.0mol/ml,
was
1.50
diluted
or
2.00%,
5ml)
to
was
a volume
respectively.
added
of
0.5,
10ml
All
1.0,
with
values,
Modified
Somogyi-Nelson
led to a marked
increase in the blank absorb
ance but the glucose
amount
obtained
was
almost
Tris.
equal
to that
of the control
without
In
this
Method
case
2947
the
prepared
in
(50mM)
and
the
the
calibration
presence
enzyme
curve
of
the
protein
of glucose
acetate
was
buffer
(104g/ml).
DISCUSSION
Effect
of
of
sodium
the
The
present
and
accuracy
judged
the
absence
determination
of
excellent
Nelson
method
concentration
tendency
to
Assay
drolysis
of
ration.
by
4.
the
a slight
absorbance.
course
curves
of
obtained
the
of
the
time
hy
prepa
by
methods
Course
the
glucoamylase
the
pres
were
closely
course
tested.
Hydrolysis
of
Maltose
Glucoamylase.
conditions:
50mM
acetate,
total
%.
Somogyi
Increasing
time
throughout
Time
0.3`0.4
showed
blank
the
iodometric
Assay
per
two
concen
activity
maltose
the
of
the
solution
in
III).
the
the
The
and
errors
an
hand,
glucose
benzoate
shows
superposed
by
the
increase
other
obtained
of glucoamylase
Figure
FIG.
with
mean
gives
(final
the
(Table
of
This
to
were
having
had
benzoate
In
typical
each
the
be
III.
a
0.5ml,
On
results
results
Table
replicates,
per
sodium
Similar
ent
five
0.25`2.0%)
gave
in
can
benzoate,
1.2%.
of
tration,
methods
0.554}0.0068.
about
addition
reproducibility
method
shown
glucose
of
the
present
sodium
of
of
absorbance
error
the
results
of
0.25mol
on
Somogyi-Nelson
of
from
the
benzoate
ml
of
reaction
volume,
method; ,
substrate,
pH
4.8;
mixture;
0.5ml. ,
the
0.8mM
enzyme
iodometric
(as
maltose;
buffer,
protein),
104g
incubation,
Procedure
method.
at
of
the
35;
present
2948
considerably lower than that of SomogyiNelson method. The slope of the calibration
curve of glucose (curve 1) obtained by pro
cedure C, the standard one in the present
method, was about 2/3 of that of curve 2
obtained by Somogyi-Nelson method. However, procedure C will probably be adequate
for most analyses as it is. If necessary, we
may use procedure G or H as a more practical
one; the slopes of curves 3 and 4 were, respec
tively, 1.6 and 2.4 times higher than that of
curve 2.
Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent is widely
used as the chromogenic reagent for the deter
mination of proteins so that somewhat high
interferences by proteins were expected in the
present method. However, the interferences
by bovine serum albumin and chicken eggwhite lysozyme were comparable to those in
Somogyi-Nelson method.
The fact that both the present and SomogyiNelson methods suffer from similar inter
ferences by commonly used buffering agents
and proteins should be kept in mind when
enzyme activities are measured by the reducing
sugar assays. Depressing effects of citrate on
Somogyi-Nelson method has already been de
scribed by Paleg,9)who suggested that the more
effective property of citrate than that of tartrate
of forming a chelate complex with copper
might be responsible for its depressing activity.
In the case of Tris, which increased markedly
the blank absorbance (Table II), also its chelate
forming ability might be responsible for the
increasing blank absorbance, because, on addi
tion of Tris, the blue color of Somogyi's
alkaline copper reagent was immediately
changed to a violet color characteristic of the
formation of a Tris-copper complex.
The
reason why the absorbance increases or decreases in the presence of Tris or citrate,
respectively, is obscure. In the case of Tris,
in spite of the high blank absorbance, the
glucose amount obtained was almost equal to
that of actually present. However, high blank
absorbances would tend to cause poor repro
ducibility of the assay. Such was the case
with Tris in the present experiment.
Although
the
200g/ml
weight)
of
II),
and
such
scarcely
enzyme
interferences
the
the
the
by
methods
were
the
of
case
amount
was
acetate
can
ibility
of
addition
of
solution.
stock
the
was
sodium
antiseptic.
of
sodium
sulfate
the
some
is
to
In
that
by
Somogyi's
alkaline
suggest
copper
oxide.
a
On
of
the
reagent
the
as
copper
tration
The
of
of
follows:
about
method
0.5
of
we
result
to
but
the
not
of
cuprous
we
propose
alkaline
sodium
in
copper
benzoate
a final
to
results
benzoate
results
give
was
benzoate
These
Somogyi's
to
sodium
reoxidation
reoxidation
A1)
be
alkaline
the
of
of these
to
of
reagent
Add
reagent
property
that
reagent.
the
basis
modification
this
com
experiment,10)
of
participation
prevention
to
of
above-
this
satisfactory
phenol
some
curve
Somogyi's
the
addition
an
appears
another
a similar
the
Folin-Ciocalteu
the
prevent
oxide.4)
obtained
for
respects
to
the
effect
the
property
to
as
the
of
reason
added
reagent
confirmed
added
property
the
glucose
standards
incidentally
this
in
cuprous
usually
calibration
which
copper
the
the
understood,
reproduc
by
to
examined
on
of
Somogyi-Nelson
we
found
comparable
the
Therefore,
Although
not
is
the
enzyme
improved
acid
excellent
pound.
is
and
to
the
glucose
and
mentioned
and
III,
in
precence
of
benzoate
glucose
the
benzoate
Benzoic
4);
glucose
reference
significantly
solutions
iodometric
the
in
present
curves
(Fig.
by
Table
of
two
the
(50mM)
of
ex
hydrolysis
method
prepared
pre
For
the
and
(104g/ml).
be seen from
both
in
by
the
present
most
presence
superposed
buffer
methods
the
of
present
curve
protein
As
in
determined
calibration
In
substances.
closely
the
may
extremely
avoided
glucoamylase,
the
protein
used.
be
course
each
components
curve
time
by
obtained
the
probably
interfering
in
of
are
calibration
maltose
on
unless
the
by
methods
amount
practice
from
will
expected
ample,
in
solutions
solution
of
amount,
influences
a large
cases,
paring
a concentration
glucose
Somogyi-Nelson
used
crude
test
the
considerable
present
(Table
at
times
gave
the
be
proteins
(2.2
to
concen
%.
presented
in
this
paper
is
Modified
Somogyi-Nelson
favorably
comparable
to Somogyi-Nelson
method in simplicity of operational
procedure
and in stability
of the color developed.
In
addition,
the present
over Somogyi-Nelson
toxic problem
Nelson method
Folin-Ciocalteu
Nelson's
of the arsenic
in Somogyican easily be solved by use of
phenol
reagent
instead
of
arsenomolybdate.
Acknowledgments.
We wish to express our thanks
to Professor T. Imamura of this department for his
encouragement during this work.
Method
2949
REFERENCES
1) N. Nelson, J. Biol. Chem., 153, 375 (1944).
2) M. Somogyi, ibid., 195, 19 (1952).
3) O. Folin and V. Ciocalteu, ibid., 73, 627 (1927).
4) M. Somogyi, ibid., 117, 771 (1937).
5) C. Hatanaka, Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi, 41, 448
(1967).
6) V. F. Kalb, Jr. and R. W. Bernlohr, Anal. Bio
chem., 82, 362 (1977).
7) P. H. Shaffer and M. Somogyi, J. Biol. Chem.,
100, 695 (1933).
8) S. R. Benedict, ibid., 51, 187 (1922).
9) L. G. Paleg, Anal. Chem., 31, 1902 (1959).
10) C. Hatanaka and Y. Kobara, unpublished data.