Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Springer-Verlag 2001
O R I G I N A L A RT I C L E
Introduction
The habit of chewing betel nuts is a common custom
among peoples from Taiwan, Southwest Asia and India
[17]. Important oral manifestations attributed to the habit
are submucous fibrosis and oral cancer [18]. In addition,
people who chew betel nuts may have a higher incidence
and severity of periodontal diseases. These have been attributed to inadequate levels of oral hygiene, increasing
accumulation of dental plaque and calculus, and more
severe gingivitis [12,28].
Most of the literature on the oral ramifications of betel nut use is based on clinical observations and measurements. However, the underlying mechanisms by which
betel nut chewing induces these diseases are complex
and not fully understood. The cytotoxic and genotoxic
effects of betel nut ingredients are considered to be the
main causative factors. Arecoline, the main betel nut alkaloid, has recently been found to exert cytotoxicity and
inhibit the growth of various cultured human cells including oral epithelial cells [8,24] and fibroblasts
[2,3,6,7,9,26]. Moreover, little is known about the actual
biological effects of betel nut chewing or its constituents
on the periodontium.
Betel nuts contain cytotoxic substances, such as arecoline, which might be important for the long-term effects
of betel nut chewing on the periodontium. Previously,
about 140 g/ml arecoline has been reported in saliva
while chewing betel nuts [16]. Betel nuts contain several
alkaloids of which arecoline is the most abundant and
many of the undesirable effects have been attributed to it
[5]. In Taiwan, two million people chew betel nuts habitually [10], which is suspected of elevating the incidence
and severity of periodontitis [29]. This implies that betel
nut chewing might be an additional risk factor for periodontal disease in Taiwan as normal gingival fibroblast
functioning is essential for the maintenance of periodon-
52
tal connective tissue, as well as wound healing. The potential toxicological implications of arecoline on the gingival fibroblasts remain elucidated. The present study
was undertaken to investigate in vitro whether arecoline
causes pathobiological effects on cultured human gingival fibroblasts.
53
inson FACScan (Becton Dickinson Immunocytochemistry Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).
Statistical analysis
Results
Figure 1 shows the effects of arecoline on incorporation
of H33258 for DNA content by fluorescence intensity.
Arecoline inhibited the DNA content of gingival fibroblasts in a dose-dependent manner. However, arecoline
was cytotoxic at a concentration level higher than
50 g/ml wherea at a concentration of 200 g/ml arecoline inhibited the DNA contents by only 50% of those in
the untreated control. Moreover, numerous floating cells
were seen with a phase-contrast microscope.
The amounts of thiols in human gingival fibroblasts
were determined using the HPLC method (Fig. 2). In
this study, arecoline significantly depleted intracellular
GSH in a dose-dependent manner. At a concentration of
50 g/ml and 100 g/ml, arecoline depleted about 22.5%
Fig. 3 Effects of arecoline on the functional mitochondrial activities by alamar blue dye assay. Results are expressed as percentages of untreated controls. All values are shown as meanSD. * denotes significant differences from control values with P<0.05
54
Fig. 4 Cell cycle analysis was performed on the cells stained with
propidium iodine using flow cytometric DNA analysis of gingival
fibroblasts during a 48-h incubation period. Cells absent of arecoline display a normal profile, peaking at 99.83 units of fluorescence representing cells in G0/G1 and at 193.66 units of fluorescence representing cells in G2/M. Arecoline-treated cells displayed
a marked arrest during the G2/M phase of the cell cycle
mitochondrial cytochromoxidase system. At concentrations of 50200 g/ml, arecoline inhibited 16% through
56% of functional mitochondrial activities.
Figure 4 presents the effects of various concentrations
of arecoline on the cell cycle of human gingival fibroblasts during a 48-h incubation period. As shown by
flow cytometric analysis, in the absence of arecoline
cells display a normal profile, peaking at 99.83 units of
fluorescence representing cells in G0/G1 and at 193.66
units of fluorescence represented in G2/M. The proportion of arecoline-treated cells arrested at G2/M phase depends directly on the arecoline concentration.
55
Discussion
The gingival fibroblast is an important component of the
periodontal connective tissues involved both in wound
healing responses and in normal metabolic processes.
Studies have suggested that the cell growth, proliferation, and matrix synthesis of fibroblasts are necessary for
regeneration of a connective tissue attachment [1,11].
Previous studies reported that arecoline inhibited cell
growth, proliferation and collagen synthesis in human
gingival fibroblasts in a dose dependent manner [3,7].
However, the potential cytotoxicity mechanisms of arecoline on human gingival fibroblasts still remain to be
elucidated.
In the present study, we have focused on the effects of
arecoline and the role it could play in periodontal breakdown via its direct effects on human gingival fibroblasts.
We discovered that arecoline is cytotoxic to human gingival fibroblasts by depleting intracellular thiols and inhibiting mitochondrial activity. Furthermore, cell displayed a G2-M blockage of the cell cycle. The use of areca nut products in conjunction with periodontal therapy
may interfere with optimal healing and/or lead to further
periodontal breakdown via its cytotoxicity.
Thiols are involved in a variety of intercellular functions and also play an important role in cellular defense
against many reactive foreign compounds [13]. During
the present study, at a concentration of up to 50 g/ml,
arecoline depleted intracellular thiols. This finding indicated that thiol depletion might be one of the mechanisms underlying arecoline cytotoxicity. These results
confirm our previous study [2] and that of Jeng et al. [8],
i.e., cytotoxicity caused by arecoline can be prevented by
adding extracellular thiols.
GSH is a predominant physiological thiol that serves
many important biological functions. It helps maintain
membrane integrity, optimal transport of amino acids
and enzyme activity. In addition, GSH has been documented as having regulatory effects on cell proliferation
activity [22]. Since cell proliferation is critical for the
maintenance of periodontal tissues and for optimal
wound healing responses, intracellular GSH depletion by
arecoline might impair the reparative and regenerative
potential of periodontal tissues of persons who chew betel nuts.
During oxidative stress, GSH peroxidase oxidizing reduces GSH to its oxidizing form GSSG. In this study,
when the cellular content of GSH was measured, a similar
decrease was observed without any concomitant oxidative
formation of GSSG. These results are in general agreement with those reported by Sundqvist et al.[24] who
found that arecoline could delete free low-molecularweight thiols in human buccal epithelial cells and that thiol depletion was not coupled with oxidative stress in these
cells. The metabolism of arecoline is not a free-radicalgeneration system in human gingival fibroblasts.
The alamar blue dye technique has been shown to detect changes in cellular metabolic activity [15]. In addition, this assay is based on the reduction of tetrazolium
56
Conclusions
The present investigation presents evidence showing the
cytotoxicity and mechanism used by arecoline on human
gingival fibroblasts under experimental conditions. We
found that arecoline is cytotoxic to human gingival fibroblasts at a concentration higher than 50 g/ml by depleting intracellular thiols and inhibiting mitochondrial
activity. In addition, cells displayed a marked arrest at
the G2/M phase in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore,
our data indicate that the use of betel nut products in
conjunction with periodontal therapy may interfere with
optimal healing and/or lead to further periodontal breakdown due to its cytotoxicity.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by a research grant
from CSMC 86-OM-B-010 and CSMC 87-OM-B-019 from the
Chung Shan Medical and Dental College.
References
1. Boyko GA, Brunett DM, Melcher AH (1980) Cell attachment
to demineralized root surface in vitro. J Periodont Res 15:
297303
2. Chang YC, Tai KW, Cheng MH, Chou LSS, Chou MY (1998)
Cytotoxic and non-genotoxic effects of arecoline on human
buccal fibroblasts in vitro. J Oral Pathol Med 27: 6871
3. Chang YC, Tai KW, Lii CK, Chou LSS, Chou MY (1999) Cytopathologic effects of arecoline on human gingival fibroblasts
in vitro. Clinl Oral Invest 3: 2529
4. Chatterjee A, Deb S (1999) Gentotoxic effect of arecoline given either by the pertioneal or routine in murine bone marrow
cells and the influence of N-acetylcysteine. Cancer Lett 139:
2331
5. International Agency for Research on Cancer (1986) Betelquid and areca-nut chewing. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 141202 (monographs, vol 37)
6. Jeng JH, Kuo ML, Hahn LJ, Kuo MYP (1994) Genotoxic and
non-genotoxic effects of betel quid ingredients on oral mucosal fibroblasts in vitro. J Dent Res 75: 10431049
7. Jeng J H, Lan WH, Hahn L J, Hsieh CC, Kuo MYP (1996) Inhibition of the migration, attachment, spreading, growth and
collagen synthesis of human gingival fibroblasts by arecoline,
a major areca alkaloid, in vitro. J Oral Pathol Med 25:
371375
8. Jeng JH, Hahn LJ, Lin BR, Hsieh CC, Chan CP, Chang MC
(1999) Effects of areca nut inflorescence piper betle extracts
and arecoline on cytotoxicity, total and unscheduled DNA synthesis in cultured gingival keratinocytes. J Oral Pathol Med
28: 6471
9. Jeng JH, Tsai CL, Hahn LJ, Yang PJ, Kuo YS, Kuo MYP
(1999) Arecoline cytotoxicity on human oral mucosal fibroblsats related to cellular thiol and esterase activities. Food Chem
Toxicol 37: 751756
10. Ko Yc, Chiang TA, Chang SJ, Hsieh SF (1992) Prevalence of
betel quid chewing habit in Taiwan and related sociodemographic factors. J Oral Pathol Med 21: 261264
11. MacNeil RL, Somerman MJ (1993) Molecular factors regulating development and regeneration of cementum. J Periodont
Res 28: 550559
12. Mehta F S, Sanjana MK, Barretto MA, Doctor R (1955) Relation of betel leaf chewing to periodontal disease. J Am Dent
Assoc 50: 531536
13. Meister A, Anderson ME (1983) Glutathione. Annu Rev Biochem 16: 711760
14. Mossman T (1983) Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular
growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. Immunol Methods 65: 5563
15. Nagy L, Szabo S, Morales RE, Plebanyi M, Jenkins JM (1994)
Identification of subcellular targets and sensitive test of ethanol-induced damage in isolated rat gastric mucosal cells. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 907910
16. Nair J, Ohshima H, Friesen M, Croisy A, Bhide SV, Bartsch H
(1985) Tobacco-specific and betel nut-specific N-nitroso compounds in saliva and urine of betel quid chewers and formation in vitro by nitrosation of betel quid. Carcinogenesis 6:
295303
17. OConnor PM (1997) Mammalian G1 and G2 phase checkpoints. Cancer Surv 29: 151182
18. Pindborg JJ, Sirsat SM (1966) Oral submucous fibrosis. Oral
Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 22: 764779
19. Rago R, Mitchen J, Wilding G (1990) DNA fluorometric assay
in 96-well tissue culture plates using Hoechst 33258 after cell
lysis by freezing in distilled water. Anal Biochem 191: 3134
20. Reed DJ, Babson JR, Beatty PW, Brodie AE, Ellis WW, Potter
DW (1980) High-performance liquid chromatography analysis
of nanomole levels of glutathione, glutathione disulfide, and
related thiols and disulfides. Anal Biochem 1980; 106, 5562
21. Scutt A, Meghji S, Canniff JP, Harvey W (1987) Stabilisation
of collagen by betel nut polyphenols as a mechanism in oral
submucous fibrosis. Experientia 43: 391393
22. Shaw J P, Chou IN (1986) Elevation of intracellular glutathione content: association with mitogenic stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts. J Cell Physiol 1986; 129: 193198
23. Sorenson CM, Eastman A (1988) Mechanism of cis-diamminedichloroplatium (II)-induced cytotoxicity: role of G2
arrest and DNA double-strand breaks. Cancer Res 48:
44844488
24. Sundqvist H, Liu Y, Nair J, Bartsch H, Arvidson H, Grafstrom
RC (1989) Cytotoxic and genotoxic effect of areca nut-related
compounds in cultured human buccal epithelial cells. Cancer
Res 49: 52945298
25. Tai KW, Chou MY, Hu CC, Yang JJ, Chang YC (2000). Induction of apoptosis in KB cells by pingyangmycin. Oral Oncol
36:242247
26. Van Wyk CW, Olivier A, Hoal-Van Helden EG, Grobler-Rabie
AF (1995) Growth of oral and skin fibroblasts from patients
with oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral Pathol Med 24: 349353
27. Wakulich CA, Tepperman BL (1997) Role of glutathione in
nitric oxide-mediated injury to rat gastric mucosal cells. European J Pharmacology 319: 333341
28. Warehaung J (1967) Prevalence of periodontal disease in Ceylon: association with age, sex, oral hygiene, socioeconomic
factors, vitamin deficiencies, malnutrition betel and tobacco
consumption and ethnic group. Final report. Acta Odontol
Scand 25: 205231
29. Wu YM, Yang YH, Tsai CC (1998) Betel quid chewing as an
additional risk for periodontal diseases measured by CPITN
(abstract). J Dent Res 77: 992
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.