Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
Magnetic Particle
Examination
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
1 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
TEBBIN PLANT
Rev. No.
3
Date:
Date:
Prepared By
Name
Signature
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
Name
Signature
Approved By
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
2 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
Reviewed By
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
Name
Date:
Signature
0
Date:01/06/02
Name
Abdallah M. A. Hassanein
Signature
CONTENTS
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
3 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
S/N
SUBJECT
SCOPE
REFERENCES
DEFINITIONS
RESPONSIBILITIES
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
4 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
TEBBIN PLANT
1.
SCOPE:
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
ATTACHMENTS
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
5 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
TEBBIN PLANT
2.
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
6 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
1.1
To specify the minimum requirements for magnetic particle inspection of welds and areas in
ferromagnetic materials, to detect discontinuities open to the surface, employing
electromagnetic and / or permanent magnet yoke equipment, with dry or wet systems.
1.2
This procedure is to cover methods to be employed for the magnetic particle inspection of
welds in pressure vessels, boilers, boiler external piping including fitting e.g. flanges, tees,
elbows, valves, etc. and associated steel structures subject to the limitations of access.
REFERENCES:
2.1 ASME Boilers & Pressure Vessels Code Section V Non-Destructive Examination, applicable
edition/addenda.
2.2 ASME Boilers & Pressure Vessels Code Section VIII Div 1, applicable edition/addenda, for
acceptance criteria.
2.3 ASME Boilers & Pressure Vessels Code Section I, applicable edition / addenda, for
acceptance criteria.
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
7 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
2.4 ASME Code B31.1, applicable edition / addenda, for acceptance criteria.
2.5 Clients specification requirements for acceptance criteria.
2.6 AR-TB-WP 001, Qualification and Certification of NDE Personnel.
DEFINITIONS:
3.
4.
3.1
MPI:
3.2
AC:
Alternating current.
3.3
DC:
Direct current.
3.4
B & PV
RESPONSIBILITIES:
TEBBIN PLANT
4.1
5.
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
8 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
The NDE Examiner shall be responsible for conducting and reporting the resultsof inspection
in accordance with ASME-B & PV Code, Section V and / or Clients specifications whichever
is more stringent.
PROCEDURE:
5.1
Personnel Qualifications:
5.1.1 All personnel involved in Magnetic Particle Examinations shall be qualified in
accordance with the requirements of ARESCO written practice No., AR-TB-WP 001,
(Written Practice for NDE Personnel Qualification).
5.1.2 When the written practice is revised, the certification of NDE personnel remains valid
to the requirements of the previous revision until the expiry date of the personnel
qualification certificate; then, recertification to the requirements of the new revision is
required.
5.1.3 Subcontractors personnel involved in Magnetic Particle Examinations shall be
qualified in accordance with the requirements of subcontractors written practice
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
9 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
which shall be reviewed and accepted by ARESCO NDE Level III or Quality Control
Manager.
5.1.4 The certification of personnel shall be checked by the Quality Control Manager or
NDE Level III prior to work commencement.
5.2
Equipment:
5.2.1 Electromagnetic yokes shall be the adjustable leg type magnaflux model Y7 yoke or
equivalent.
5.2.2 The yoke will be capable of lifting a test weight of 40 Ib (18.1 kg.) at a pole spacing
of 4 in. (100 mm.) while on DC, and a test weight 10 Ib (4.5 kg.) at a pole spacing of
4 in. (100 mm.) while on AC.
5.2.3 Permanent magnets either with fixed or adjustable pole shall have a lifting power
capable of lifting a test weight of 40 lbs. (18.1 kg).
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
10 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
5.2.4 Calibration of the said weights shall be in accordance with the relevant calibration
procedure.
5.3
Material:
5.3.1 Only materials of a recognised approved commercial quality shall be used, as
identified by the manufacturers name i.e. Ardrox, Ely Chemicals, Magnaflux,
Becotest, or as specified by the client. In any case, the specific type of material to be
used, shall be demonstrated to the satisfaction of A.I. in accordance with ASME Code
Section V, Article 1, T-150, and certificate shall be attached to this procedure upon
demonstration.
5.3.2 Ready mixed wet consumables contained in aerosol can form are considered
acceptable.
5.3.3 Dry powders of appropriate colors that can make them highly visible against the
background of the surface being examined, may be used for dry applications.
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
11 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
5.3.4 Particles shall be used within the temperature range limitations set by the
manufacturer.
5.4
Surface Condition:
5.4.1 Generally satisfactory results may be obtained when the surface of the part is in the
as-welded, as-rolled, as-cast, or as forged condition. Surface preparation by grinding,
machining, or other methods may be necessary where surface irregularities could
mask the interpretation.
5.4.2 Prior to magnetic particle examination the weld areas that are to be examined and all
adjacent areas within at least 1 in. shall be dry and free of all dirt, grease, lint, scale,
welding flux and spatter, oil, or other extraneous matter that could interfere with the
examination.
5.5
Preparation:
5.5.1 Preparation may include degreasing, removal of scale, weld ripples, spatter, grinding
or chipping marks, etc. that may interfere with the interpretation.
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
12 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
5.5.2 Cleaning may be accomplished using detergents, organic solvents, descaling solutions,
paint removers, sand or grit blasting methods.
5.5.3 If coatings are left on the part in the area being examined, it must be demonstrated
that indications can be detected through the existing maximum coating thickness
applied. When AC yoke technique is used, the demonstration must be in accordance
with Mandatory Appendix I of Article 7, ASME Code Section V.
5.5.4 When coatings are applied temporarily to uncoated surfaces only in amounts sufficient
to enhance particle contrast, it must be demonstrated that indications can be detected
through the enhancement coating.
NOTE:
5.6
Examination:
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
5.6.1
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
13 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
For electromagnetic yoke, the yoke is energised, and the ink or powder is
applied to the area between the poles. The application of the ink/powder shall be
stopped and the excess of the medium shall be removed before the yoke is deenergised.
For permanent magnets, the magnet shall be placed across the area and the ink
or powder is applied to the area between the poles. The application of the
ink/powder shall be stopped and the excess of the medium shall be removed
before the magnet is removed.
5.6.2 For the application of powder in either technique, the powder shall be introduced to
the area very lightly and sparingly so as not to disturb any lightly held powder
patterns.
5.6.3 With the ink method, care shall be exercised to avoid flooding of the area.
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
14 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
5.6.4 The examination shall be repeated with the magnet/ yoke being relocated at 90 to the
first magnetisation direction.
5.6.5 To ensure full coverage of the area under examination, overlap of at least 1 inch
between successive yoke shots shall be maintained.
5.6.6 The adequacy or direction of the magnetising field, when necessary, shall be
demonstrated by using the magnetic particle field indicator. The magnetic particle
field indicator described in ASME V Fig. T-753.1.1 shall be used.
5.6.7 Good lighting, when using nonfluorescent particles, shall be available to ensure that
shadows do not obstruct the test areas. The intensity of the visible light at the
surface of the part / work piece undergoing examination shall be a minimum of 100
foot candles (1000 lux). The light level verification shall be demonstrated one time,
documented, and maintained on file.
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
15 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
5.6.8 With fluorescent particles, the examination is performed using black light. The
examination shall be performed as follows:
5.6.9
5.7
Demagnetisation shall be required after the completion of the examination when the
residual magnetic field could interfere with subsequent processing or usage.
Interpretation:
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
16 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
5.7.1 All indications shall be considered as discontinuities, until investigated, where they
shall then be defined as relevant to the specification / codes, and shall be evaluated in
terms of the acceptance standards of the referencing Code Section.
5.7.2 Non-relevant indications may be caused by change of section, property of material,
inadequate preparation i.e., slag scale, etc. and therefore not considered detrimental
to the weld area examined.
5.7.3 Broad areas of particle accumulation which might mask indications from
discontinuities are prohibited, and such areas shall be cleaned and re-examined.
5.7.4 Should any indication not be identified then it shall be rejected and reported as a
defect and investigated with an alternative NDE method.
5.8
Acceptance Criteria:
5.8.1
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
5.9
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
17 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
Post Cleaning:
5.9.1
Upon the completion of the examination, a suitable technique for post cleaning shall
be employed such as water rinse or solvent dwell.
5.10 Documentation:
5.10.1 Each examination shall be reported together with interpretation of flaws/defects
encountered, and where necessary diagrammatic sketches shall be made to show the
location of defects.
5.10.2 As a minimum the report shall give the following information:
Job No.
Interpretation.
Date of examination.
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
ATTACHMENTS:
6.
6.1
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
18 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
19 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
TEBBIN PLANT
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
20 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
Project :
Job No.:
Part Examined:
Drawing No.:
Material:
Thickness:
Surface Condition:
Acceptance Criteria :
Surface Temperature:
Method Description
Equipment Type:
Examination Method:
Manufacturer:
Current Type :
Particles :
Manufacturer:
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
Magnetizing Time:
Color:
Lighting:
Contrast Medium:
Post Cleaning:
Weld ID
Demagnetization :
Welder ID
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
21 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
Manufacturer:
Judgement
Remarks
TEBBIN PLANT
MAGNETIC PARTICLE
EXAMINATION
PROCEDURE
AR-TB-MT-001
Rev.
Page
22 OF 22
Date
01 June, 2002
SKETCH
Name
NDE Examiner
Client Representative
Authorized Inspector
Signature
Level
Date