Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
FULL REPORT
BFC21201
Course Code
BFC 21201
Course Name
Experiment Title
Date
Group
Name
Members of Group
29/02/2016
1
AHMAD ARIEF AIZZUDDIN BIN AZINAL ABIDIN (CF150249)
CF150131
(GroupBIN
1) ISMAIL (CF150245)
1.ABDUL WASIQ
2.AHMAD ASYRAF BIN SAARI (CF150247)
3.AHMAD FIQRI BIN HAMDAN (CF150243)
4.AMIRUL BIN AMRAN (CF150131)
5. AHMAD ARIEF AIZZUDDIN BIN AZINAL ABIDIN (CF150249)
Attendance
Purpose is identified
Purpose is identified
Analjsis /
Result
Discussion
Accurate representation of
the data using tables and/or
graphs
analyzed
Interview
VT
Procedure
Data
SCR
Aim &
Materials
(optional)
TSCR(X)
NAME OF LECTURER:
SIGNATURE:
Comment by examiner
DATE:
TOTAL SCORE:
Received
1.
OBJECTIVE
2.
INTRODUCTION
3.
THEORY
4.
APPARATUS
5.
PROCEDURE
Place the hanger and the digital dial test indicator at the mid span.
Applied an in incremental load and record the deflection for each increment
in the table below.
6.
RESULT
No.
Mass ( N )
(Y
% Different
max)
0.981
0.26
-2.9 x 10-4
-8.98 x 104
1.471
0.38
-4.33 x 10-4
-8.79 x 104
1.961
0.51
-5.77 x 10-4
-8.85 x 104
No.
Mass ( N )
(Y
% Different
max )
0.981
0.14
-1.48 x 10-4
-9.47 x 104
1.471
0.20
-.2.22 x 10-4
-9.02 x 104
1.961
0.25
-2.95 x 10-4
-8.48 x 104
No.
Mass ( N )
(Y
% Different
max )
0.981
0.06
-6.24 x 10-5
-9.63 x 104
1.471
0.09
-9.35 x 10-5
-9.64 x 104
1.961
0.11
-1.25 x 10-4
-8.81 x 104
SAMPLE CALCULATION:
Theoretical Deflection (Y max)
Given, E
steel
Width, b = 1.90cm
m = 19 x 10-3
Thick, d = 0.30cm
m = 3 x 10-3
max
= - PL3
48EI
=-
(0.981) x (0.5) 3
max
= - PL3
48EI
=-
(1.471) x (0.5) 3
max
= - PL3
48EI
(1.961) x (0.5) 3
=-
max
= - PL3
48EI
=-
(0.981) x (0.4) 3
max
= - PL3
48EI
(1.471) x (0.4) 3
=-
max
= - PL3
48EI
(1.961) x (0.4) 3
=-
max
= - PL3
48EI
(0.981) x (0.3) 3
=-
-5
max
= - PL3
48EI
(1.471) x (0.3) 3
=-
-5
max
= - PL3
48EI
=-
(1.961) x (0.3) 3
-4
7.
DISCUSSION
Referring the results from the calculation, we can conclude that, the
different between the theoretical and experimental results are very high for
experiment 1, 2, and 3. Thus, the percentage (%) of the difference between
the theoretical and experimental results were very high too. From the
experiment, the span with longer length will give us the bigger value of
deflection when the load is place at the mid span for both theoretical and
experimental results. While for the span with shorter length, the deflection is
slightly small compare to the longer span.
From the results we get from this experiment, different between the
theoretical and experimental results are very high. The deflection in the span
increase when the load is increase. Besides that, the value of deflection also
increase when the length of span used is longer. Thus, we conclude that, the
deflection of span is proportional to the load we place on it and the length of
the span we used.
EXTRA QUESTION
Given, E
steel
Width, b = 1.90cm
Thick, d = 0.30cm
m = 19 x 10-3
m = 3 x 10-3
Vmax = PL3
16EI
=
(1.471) x (0.4)3
16 (207 x 109) (4.275 x 10-11)
= 0.094144
141.588
= 6.65 x 10-4 m
8.
CONCLUSION
the beams under load, we have used theoretical formula. From the
experiment and the results we get from this experiment, we notice that, the
span with longer length will give us the bigger value of deflection when the
load is place at the mid span for both theoretical and experimental results.
While for the span with shorter length, the deflection is slightly smaller
compare to the longer span though the load used is same with the longer
one. Thus, we conclude that, the deflection of span is proportional to the
length of the span and the load we place on it.