Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Abstract
The automobile industry has shown increased interest in the replacement of steel springs with berglass reinforced composite leaf
springs. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to present a general study on the analysis, design and fabrication of composite springs. From this
viewpoint, the suspension spring of a compact car, ``a jeep'' was selected as a prototype.
A single leaf, variable thickness spring of glassber reinforced plastic (GFRP) with similar mechanical and geometrical properties to the
multileaf steel spring, was designed, fabricated (molded and hoop wound) and tested. The testing was performed experimentally in the
laboratory and was followed by the road test. Comparison between the performance of the GFRP and the multileaf steel springs is
presented. In addition, other relevant parameters will be discussed. # 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
Keywords: Composite materials; Leaf springs; Automobile parts
1. Introduction
There are different types of materials for metallic springs
depending on the application. The materials used for such
springs are principally, SAE-1080, 1095, 5155-60, 6150-60
and 9250-60. These are initially pre-stressed so as to
increase the carrying capacity of the springs.
It is well known that springs, in general, are designed to
absorb and store energy and then release it. Hence, the strain
energy of the material becomes a major factor in designing
the springs. The relationship of the specic strain energy can
be expressed as
U
s2
rE
(1)
0:3
(2)
bh2 X
bhS
where P is the applied load per wheel, x the position along
the horizontal axis, b the width, h the thickness at any x, X
and S are the average longitudinal and shear strengths of laminate, respectively. Then the boundary conditions can be included, such as the design load carrying capacity which is taken
here as 1600 kg, factor of safety equals 3, width 4:5 cm,
and the mechanical properties of the glassfiber/epoxy layer
(X 640 MPa, S 31 MPa, using 25% unidirectional and
75% woven fabric of glassfiber/epoxy). The variation of
thickness (h) as a function of position from the spring centre
(x) can be expressed by the following empirical equation:
h 2:192 4:805 0:091x2 1=2 1=2
(3)
59
60
Fig. 3. Hoop filament wound GFRP spring together with the mandrel.
4. Test procedures
The performance of an existing multileaf steel spring was
compared with the fabricated prototype berglass/epoxy
single leaf spring, Fig. 4. The springs were subjected to a
series of laboratory static loading tests. The test consists of
mounting the spring on a beam which is attached to the lower
platen of a hydraulic testing machine. A specially designed
punch was attached to the upper platen of the machine. The
test simulated a three-point bending test which was monitored continuously throughout the experiment.
A summary of the specications and performance of the
steel and the prototype berglass/epoxy leaf springs under
static loading are enumerated in Table 1. It can be observed
that the most outstanding feature is the impressive weight
saving of the GFRP spring over the conventional multileaf
steel spring. On the other hand, better rigidity of the steel
Steel
GFRP
38.0
1634
1250
6.4
18.7
7
45
29.5
1386
1100
3.16.1
3.5
88
45
720
61