Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ISSN: 2278-0181
Vol. 4 Issue 09, September-2015
I.
INTRODUCTION
IJERTV4IS090748
LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Scheduling of jobs/machines
The objective of this model is to assign the tools and jobs
to machines so that the 'borrowing' of tools is minimized
while maintaining a 'reasonable' workload balance. This is a
nonlinear integer programming problem, and it is
computationally expensive. The two sub-problems each have
the same objective but the constraints are divided. The first
problem finds an optimum tool allocation, given the job
allocation. The second problem finds an optimal job
allocation; given the tool allocation and both problems
become linear [5].
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
755
IJERTV4IS090748
III.
METHODOLOGY
Operation
J1(n1 = 3)
O11
O12
O13
O21
O22
O23
O31
O32
O33
O34
O41
O42
J2(n2 = 3)
J3(n3 = 4)
J4(n4 = 2)
M/c
M/c
M/c
M/c
M/c
5
2
5
4
2
5
4
9
6
2
4
1
5
5
4
5
5
6
5
8
1
5
5
5
1
4
5
5
4
9
4
6
2
4
2
2
2
1
7
4
7
8
5
7
5
2
1
4
1
2
5
5
8
5
5
9
4
4
5
12
2
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
756
Sequence of operation
M/C1
M/C2
M/C3
M/C4
M/C5
IJERTV4IS090748
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
757
Demand
time
No. of
AGVs
Velocity of
AGVs
Throughput
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
10
10
10
15
15
15
20
20
20
10
10
10
15
15
15
20
20
20
10
10
10
15
15
15
20
20
20
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
60
65
70
60
65
70
60
65
70
65
70
60
65
70
60
65
70
60
70
60
65
70
60
65
70
60
65
30567
30714
30533
18484
18567
18813
15850
15759
15967
28364
30275
30380
18835
18624
18739
15586
15690
15575
30276
30596
30264
18854
18846
18780
15795
15753
15865
Fig. (c): Interaction plots between demand arrival time and no. of AGVs
for throughput
Fig. (d): Interaction plots between distance preference and demand arrival
time for throughput
Demand
time
No. of
AGVs
Velocity of
AGVs
System
Utilization
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Small
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Large
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
Cyclical
10
10
10
15
15
15
20
20
20
10
10
10
15
15
15
20
20
20
10
10
10
15
15
15
20
20
20
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
2
3
4
60
65
70
60
65
70
60
65
70
65
70
60
65
70
60
65
70
60
70
60
65
70
60
65
70
60
65
0.10534
0.10535
0.10577
0.08142
0.08042
0.08048
0.06547
0.06278
0.07373
0.10865
0.10526
0.10456
0.06523
0.06039
0.06235
0.06285
0.06326
0.05256
0.10569
0.10676
0.10416
0.08239
0.08352
0.08045
0.06287
0.06345
0.06478
IJERTV4IS090748
Fig. (e): Interaction plots between demand arrival time and velocity of
AGVs for system throughput
Fig. (f): Interaction plots between demand arrival time and velocity of AGVs
for system utilization
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
758
Fig. (g): Interaction plots between and distance preference and demand
arrival time for system utilization
Factors
Level
Value
Distance presence
Demand arrival
time
No. of AGVs
Velocity of AGVs
Level 1
Smallest distance
Level 1
10 minutes
Level 3
-
4
69.384
Fig. 4(h): Interaction plots between demand arrival time and velocity of
AGVs for system utilization
Factors
Level
Value
Distance presence
Demand arrival
time
No. of AGVs
Velocity of AGVs
Level 1
Smallest distance
Level 1
10 minutes
Level 3
-
4
61.396
II
III
IV
1
2
3
Delta
Rank
0.08681
0.08628
0.08684
0.00065
3
0.10573
0.08086
0.06334
0.06239
1
0.08675
0.08659
0.0676
0.00018
4
0.08697
0.08659
0.08638
0.00071
2
II
III
IV
1
2
3
Delta
Rank
21378
21236
21340
20895
2
30457
18732
15761
15670
1
22194
23118
22633
38956
3
21319
21318
21315
20233
4
Table 9: Factor and their level for maximizing throughput and system
utilization through genetic algorithm
B. Optimization
In this research, system throughput of system and system
utilization both are optimized by genetic algorithm, using
genetic algorithm following results obtained as shown in
table 5 and table 6 respectively for maximum throughput.
IJERTV4IS090748
Factors
Level
Value
Distance presence
Demand arrival time
No. of AGVs
Velocity of AGVs
Throughput
System utilization
Level 1
Level 1
Level 3
-
Smallest distance
10 minutes
4
61.396
30019
0.1081%
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
759
C. Conclusion
A simulation modeling and optimization of FMS objectives
for evaluating the effect of factors such as demand arrival
time, no. of AGVs, velocity of AGVs, and distance
preference between two work stations used in system. System
utilization and throughput both are affected by these factors.
It is observed that from comparing the result maximum
percentage of utilization is 10% against of throughput
parameters. System utilization and throughput is more
affected by demand arrival time comparatively other three
factors. Distance preference also affects throughput and
system utilization. For both system utilization and throughput
distance preference should be smallest and as the demand
arrival time increases both system utilization and throughput
of system decreases.
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I take an opportunity to acknowledge and extend my
heartfelt gratitude and the pivot of this initiative Dr. Trilok
Singh Bisoniya (Dean), Department of Mechanical
Engineering, SIRTE, Bhopal, for their valuable guidance,
encouragement and help for this work. Their useful
suggestions for this whole work and co-operative behavior
are gratefully acknowledged.
Most importantly I would like to express deepest of
gratitude towards my parents Shri Chandeshwari Singh &
Smt. Shiromani Devi who stood behind me and believed in
my abilities.
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
REFERENCES
[1]
IJERTV4IS090748
[13]
[14]
www.ijert.org
(This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.)
760