You are on page 1of 5

# ,:.

...........

~1.

## Analysis' of 'Pilot-Symbol Aided Channel'Estimation for

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ,
...

.. .. , .:.

: ,,

.I:

,:*:

,
i...

.: ;:.,

..

,
:..

. - .

:I

, ,.

MIMO-OFDM Systems
. . . .

. . .

. ;.

~

. I

'

8 .

. . ., .,

## -'.Chengdu,610054;P.R. China -.. : . "

E-Mail: hansenchang@l63.com~ .
.

>..

. .

.,,.

.I

;-.,,:

. . . . . .

. . . . .

'

..

## Absfracl--Multiple transmit and receive antennas can be

. . ,
used to form multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)
channels to increase the capacity by a factor of the
minimum number of transmit and .receive ,'antennas.
Orthogonal frequency division multipleXing (OFDM) for
MIMO: channels (MtMO-OPDM) .can :-improve-.the
performance by mitigating intersymbol interference and
.enhancing .System: capacity. Thiw paper investigates
pilot-symbol aided, channel estimation .(PSACE) .for
MIMO-O.F.DM. . . systems......Two'. app,roaches are
*investigated:..fir\$t, zero. pilot .pattern .use all available
pilot symbols simultaneously;. .second, ' nonzero., pilot
pattern is. . al1o.cated for- each ., transmit, . antenna
exclqsively. The ,Wiener .filters are derived .for both
approaches.
. ,
.
'

:.

## Youxi Tang, Shaoqian Li

National Key Lab. of Communications
University'of Electronic Science and Technology
Chengdu, 610054, P.R. China
.E-Mail: lsq@uestc.edu&
. '.

. . . . .

## National Key Lab. of Cohunications

.' '.

. . . .

'

. .

order to detect the received signal coherently, an' accurate
channel estimate is essential. By periodically inserting
pilots in the transmitted signa1,'while the.sampling theorem
is satisfied, the channel .response can be reconstru~ted~~~.
PSACE has been successfully applied to OFDM e.g. 141.
More recently, channel estimatiod for MIMO-OFDM
systems has been investigated['. 6l. The estimator based on
the least squares (LS) and minimum mean squared error
(MMSE) criterion for MIMO-OFDM systems have been
derived in [7].While there.is a hard limit for the minimum
number of pilots for the LS estimator, Nu, the MMSE
estimator exists even if the.number of pilots, Np, is less than
By applying the 'sampling theorem, the minimum
number of pilots, Npnrjn,for which the signal can be
reconstructed, can be derived. In this paper it is shown that

## if N& is sufficient to satisfy the .sampling theorem, the 'LS

.
estimator does exist, i.e. NPn,,=N,,. Otherwise, the MMSE
Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) is
, .
estimator will experience an irreducible error floor: Thus,
:very attractive :for. high-speed wireless communication
by using an.MMSE estimator the requirements for Np are
because of its various advantages in lessening the severe
not relaxed..
effects ' of. freqaency-selective .fading' 'and 'Inter-symbol
., The channel estimation approaches assume that all NT
,'Infe~erence(ISI)['l: Applying' multiple antennas at both
transmit antennas utilize all available pilots .simultaneously,
ter 'and receiver -sides, especially when' the
e.g. zero pilot pattern.. Alternatively, by exclusively
ent provides rich scattering, can'greatly improve
assign.ing.:each transmit antenna a subset of .all available
.the capacity" of a wireless .'So~nunication'link :in
pilots, e.g. nonzero pilot pattern, PSACE. for single antenna
flat-fading'21.To 'deal with the frequency-selective 'nature of
systems can be applied in a straightforward way. However,
broadband wireless channels, OFDM can be combined.with
if such zero pilot pattern sequences are used; the number of
..
multiple-input multiple-output,(MlMO) techniques. .
available pilots per transmit antenna kreduced by Nr times.
Transmitting a data signal over a wireless fading channel,
. . .
..
. . .
In, this paper MIMO-OFDM .channel, estimation utilizing
zero and nonzero pilot pattern are compared. It is shown
* This Work was: pz\$ly~s~pqarl~dby National 863 Program of'china
(2001AA1230131) and Nalional NaNral Science Foundation of China
that the requirements for N-in, as well as the MMSE of
(60390540-3) . . . . . . . . . .
both approaches are equivalent.
. . .
. ~, ,.,.
,.,,.

:.i

..' ,

1: INTRODUCTION
. . '
. . , _ . .

~ , ,. ,

'

'

'

'

'

'

:.?

0-7803-8647-7/04/\$20.0002004 IEEE.

299

## The rest of this paper is organized as follows: the system

model and channel model in MIMO-OFDM system are
briefly described in section II; the Wiener filter and the
corresponding MSE are derived in section 111; results are
presented in section IV; and the conclusions are finally
given in Section V.

## The channel impulse response (CIR) is assumed to be

constant during one OFDM symbol. The channel of the
qth tap,

## sense stationary (WSS), complex Gaussian random

variable with zero mean. All channel taps and all

## auto-correlation function of the CIR in (2) between

subcarriersm and n is given by

pw)[m-n]
"H

## modulator is employed on each transmit antenna, as

illustrated in Fig. 1, For OFDM the signal stream is divided
into N, parallel substreams, e.g. subcamers. The kth
subcarrier, of the lth symbol block, named OFDM symbol,
transmitted from antenna i, is denoted by \$1. Then, the
demodulation is obtained's1

EIHr'Hyl

## B. lime-frequency Pilot Pattern

Channel estimation of OFDM system is dependent on the
choice of the pilot sequences and the pilot spacing D,in the
frequency and D, in the time. Fig. 2 denotes the pilot pattern
of frequency. In order to reconstruct the signal, there exists
a maximum Qand D,,dependent on the maximum delay of

j = l , ...,N,;k = I ,.._.
N.

## where N,,k denotes additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN)

with zero mean and variance No. Throughout the paper, it is
assumed that the intersymbol interference (ISI) is
completely eliminated by inserting the guard intervals;
meanwhile, time and frequency synchronization is perfect.

Although

## Fourier transform of the channel impulse response (CIR),

h'',')(f,r) . Considering a frequency selective, Rayleigh
fading channel, modeled by a tapped delay line with L
non-zero tapstS1, Ht;') can be described by[']

## since the channel destroys the orthogonality of the pilots.

be satisfied D , N r r z / T S l and

f,JFD, S l / 2 , fm

## denotes the maximum Doppler frequency, assuming that all

N f l ~channels have approximately the same maximum
c.r,, .
delay,
A. Channel Model
For PSACE utilizing a nonzero pilot pattern, the Nr pilot
The channel gain function (CGF), Hl(ln, is obtained by sequences are generally chosen from orthogonal designs.
sampling the analog CGF H ( ' . I ) ( t , f ) at time and We use phase-shifted sequences, defined b p l
2:) = e - / b i i l N ~,. k- = { l , ...,N p }
frequency instants f =IT,, and f = Wr, where Tsym=
(4)
( N F ~ + N ~ and
~ ) TT~ =~ NmTspl
~
represents the OFDM
i = (I.. ..,N,)

rz)

## By applying the sampling theorem, a condition for the

minimum number of pilots required to reconstmct the
signal of all Nr channels can be established.

z<r* pilo,

n.mm

I It31 I I I I I<e,I I I I
I I I Iis1 1 1 I I IP,,' I
c .

Ti

T I 2 i.

rrrpvrncy

3'00

data

While

phase-shifted

pilot

sequences

are

assumed

## throughout this paper, if other orthogonal sequences, e.g.

Walsh-Hadamard sequences, there is no difference in terms
of MSE or the maximum OFThe total transmit power that is
allocated for transmitted pilots, is futed. Thus, the

## the Nr waveforms, corresponding to the Nr superimposed

signals; interpolate between the pilots in order to get an
estimate for each data symbol; as well as to average over
the noise. We consider two approaches. The first approach

## total transmission power.

If a zero pilot pattern is used, one transmit antenna is
exclusively allocated a subset of all available pilot slots.
Mathematically, the N ~ p i l osequences
t
can be written in the
form

## is based on utilizing a zero pilof pattern. Each transmit

antenna's signal has a dedicated number of pilot slots,
which is exclusively reserved for that transmit antenna. So,
if transmit antenna i is transmitting a pilot at a certain
subcarrier, all other transmit antennas are silent. The second

other antennas are silent that transmit antenna can use all

## approach utilizes a nonzero pilot paftern. At a pilot slot all

Nrtransmit antennas transmit a pilot, as illustrated in Fig. 2.

available power.

## Since only one transmit antenna is sending a pilot while all

sequences.

111. PILOT-SYMBOL
AIDEDCHANNEL
ESTIMATION

B. Wiener filter

## A. Frequency Domain Estimation

~
i we ~focus
~ on~channel
,
estimation in frequency
direction ( m a r r i e r index k). Thus, the index denoting
the OFDM symbol I, will be dropped in the following.
For PSACE, Np known pilot subcarriers are periodically
between
multiplexed into the N~ subcarriers. fie
two adjacent pilots isD, = L N , / N , ] , where 1x1 being the
largest integer not larger than x, PSACE was first
a d required a flat
introduced for single carrier

## The task of the estimator is to separate Nrsuperimposed

signals, interpolate between pilots and average over the
noise. The channel gain function (CGF) estimate for

wbcamer is given by

fipn = w v . n ( k ) p ~= R m
( ' , ! I ( ~YY) ~ ( ! ! - ~ I

w(.'I

(m?}

,=,

## where the transmitted pilot

AWGN term are given by

p'"
jp

sehuence,

+'", ...,\$)y

=qffI

[~(','l(k),...,~~~)(k)],
in general, depends
and the

@""
In order to determine the filer, knowledge about the
channel statistics is required. The auto-correlation matrix of
the Ieceived
pilots is described by

p~;
= E[pL,'ptij"
where

## the MSE between the desired response, H?',

expressed as
5 4 1 = p\$('l"'.'l

(k

## fading channel'''. To describe PSACE it is useful to define a

subset of the transmitted signal sequence containing only
the pilots,
= {A'?} ,with k = b,.
In vector notation the received pilot sequence of one
OFDM symbol from receive antenna j can be conveniently

(7)

Rkil

= ~ ~ ( o R ~ ; IN~I ( v

(8)

/-I

## (6) pilot positions. The auto-correlation matrix of AWGN is

the CGF, and the described by N\$, where I denotes the.identity matrix. With
(3) the mthrow and nthcolumn of can be expressed as
[R!il)m,a = E [ fi"."#"."'
I
"

E@N,"

,,_,,
f;!)Ep,

]=&)[D,+-4]

(9)

## Note that the correlation function of two subcarriers spaced

n pilots apart is &'[D,n],
since the pilots sample the

301

## channel gain function at a D/times lower rate.

The cross-correlation vector between the received pilots

## channels have a similar maximum delay rkl';PSACE with,

R (,.,I
, ( k ) = E ,r+Iq(,J"

and

With ' L = l k / D , ]

I=%(

(VI

,~

k .~('1''

R!i)(k)'=E[Af')H(',')

,. .(lo)

. ..

"I. ,.'.'I

The nth

'

'

.

## response; i.e. the'CGF of subcarrier k, which is in the form'

, .
. .
{R!f(k)} = E[HYJ@'?] = pi:][& D,n] . , ( l l )
I

',

.,

' ,

,.>

.. ,..
. . .

"..

:.'.:.>

## The MSE of an arbitrary estimator w ofdiniension .IxN p

can he expressed in the general fofm . . . . . . .. . .. . . . :

,,

" '

.', .:;
..,

. . . . . .

,~

C. MSEAnalysis

..

.,

,'

and (10)
.~

..

## we ha\$e used the assumption that all. .transmit antennas'

signals are mutually uncorrelated. . ~.
.
,
Generally,'it is of great computational complexity to' use
all pilots Np. Instead a window of size M/can be slid over
. '
the'frequency grid, with MJ<Np.

## As shown in Appendix, for PSACE with nokero 'pilot

,
.
,
pattern
all pilot slots cany information for each transmit
.....

D. Time Domain
. Estimation.

'v

accounts

## for the received pilot sequence of one OFDM symbol, and

..
is used to detekink'the cokelation functions RI( .and
.' (12);'is valid for a i y esiimatbr '. w "with' -or

~gJ(k)

'

## antenna. Hence, the optimum Wiener filter W1',JJ(k)

from
.
.
(7j.wiiI have dimension'Np =N& , ,
. -.
To estimate the CGF of antenna pair (ij),pilot sequence

..

.. . .. . . .

.,.

## without model mismatch.

. . I

: . . .; . : . . . . . . s
After the fust-stage described -in previous section, we
finish the channel estimation in time by linear interpolate
using CIR of three 'pilot; Fig. 3;'denoteS the time
the channel
interpolation; Given a tertain subcariier, b,:
.. . . .. . . . .
estimation at time is'givenby[lol
'

.>

## system. However,' the effective pilot spacing for'the Ith

antenna's signal is NT times increased, so Dl. = D,NT.The
. .
resulting Wiener filter W'""(k) from (7) has one non-zero
. . . .
coefficient followed by NT1 zero coefficients. By using

. . .

. . . . . .

## only those pilot suhcarriers from 9 in (6), which cany

.
.
infornktion about the CGF of antenna i, PSACE w j h zero,

,.

.. . .. .. . . .

..

',

I .

## pilot pattem can be described by an equivalent single'

antenna system Y".'J= 8","+ R dimension Dp= N ,. /,,.N, .
In terms of the equivalent single antenna system, ?','),

appropriate

Wiener

filter

the:
of

i W J ( k )=,R:\$(~)R;;

## dimension Dp contains all 'non-zero: coefficients of

w(',J1(+)from (7). Thus, .the dimension of the optimum
Wiener filter is Nr times lower than
for PSACE.
...
'

D,

.'I

: ,

. . .

. D,'

.,.

...:*',

. .

+'I

*.I1

~z:8la&

. .

'4.'.

Pilot

. ..

..

.
~.
. ,

fi".'

rji:n

4H.l.

Data

1wQh

.
t

Tim

''

. . . .
Fig. 3 Time dimension interpolation

## An OFDM system with N,=NR=2 is used; The chitinel

model is M.1225 Vehicular Channel A, with 6 paths, Tab. 1:.
presents the environment parameters of channel. A carrier
frequency is set to be 2GHz; and the maximum Doppler
frequency shift is lOOHz, adbandwidth of 20MHz.is used,:
and guard interval is 12.8trs, the total number.of subcarriers
is N=1024, and the OFDM symbol is modulated by QPSK
(Quadrature Phase Shift Keying). The pilot spacing meets
the parameters D,NI 5 5 in the frequency domain, and
.

302

## Tab. I parametem of channel

I Tap 1

ChannelA

REFERENCES

IT-kFLA
Relative delay@)

Average power(dB)

310

-1.0

710

-9.0

1090

-10.0

2510

-20.0

## [I] L.J.Cimini Jr. Adalysis and simulation of a digital

mobile
channel
using
orthogonal
division
multiplexing, IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 33, pp.

.Eb/NO(dB)

## Fig. 4 BER vs SNR for a perfectly matched Wiener filter with

nonzero pilot pattern and zero pilot pattern

## In Fig. 4 the BER for different pilot pattern is plotted

against the SNR EdNo. A Wiener filter is employed that is
perfectly matched to the channel statistics and uses all
available pilots. The performance of PSACE with zero pilot
perforniance using nonzero pilot pattern.

V. CONCLUSIONS

## 665-675, July 1985.

[2] G J. Foschini and M. J. Gans, On limits of wireless
communications in a fading environment when using
multiple
antennas.
Wireless
Personal
Communications, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 311-335, March
1998.
[3] J. K. Cavers, An Analysis of Pilot Symbol Assisted
Modulation for Rayleigh Fading Channels, IEEE
Trans. Vehic. Technol., vol: VT- 40, pp. 68C693, Nov.
1991.
[4] P. Hoeher, S. Kaiser, and P. Robertson,
Pilot-Symbol-Aided Channel Estimation in Time and
Frequency, in Proc. Communication Theoxy
Mini-Conf. (CTMC) within IEEE Global Telecommun.
Conf. (GLOBECOM97), Phoenix, USA, pp. 90-96,
1997.
[5] Y. Li, N. Seshadri, and S. Ariyavisitakul, Channel
Estimation for OFDM Systems with Transmitter
Diversity in Mobile Wireless Channels, IEEE J. Sel.
Areas Commun., vol. 17, pp. 461-470, Mar. 1999.
[6] Y. Li, Simplified Channel Estimation for OFDM
Systems with Multiple Transmit Antennas, IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 1, pp. 67-75, Jan. 2002.
[7] Y. Gong and K. Letaief, Low Rank Channel Estimation
for Space- Time Coded Wideband OFDM Systems, in

## pilot sequences with a nonzero and zero pilot pattern were

examined. The Wiener filter, which is the optimum MMSE
estimator, has been derived for both approaches. Bounds for
the minimum number of pilots were derived by applying the
sampling theorem. The MMSE is independent on the
chosen pilot sequences, provided that a set of orthogonal
pilot sequences is chosen. Simulation results show the
performance using nonzero pilot pattern is improved,

[SI

## Proc. IEEE Vehic. Technol. Conf. (VTC2001-Fall),

Atlantic City, USA, pp. 722-776,2001.
J. G Proakis, Digital Communications. New York

## McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 3rd ed., 1995.

[9] J. G Proakis and D. G Manolakis, Digital Signal
Processing; Principle, Algorithms, and Applications.
Prentice Hall, NJ, USA, 3rd ed., 1996.
[IO] S. Sampei, T. Sunaga, Rayleigh fading compensation
for QAM in land mobile radio channels, IEEE Trans.
Veh. Tech.Vol. 42,no. 2, pp.137-147,May 1993.

303