Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Witnesses
Date founded
1879
Place founded
Pittsburgh
Founder
Charles Taze Russell (1852-1916)
Adherents
6.4 million practicing members in 2003 {1}
Headquarters
Brooklyn, New York
Main location
USA
Major sects
none
Sacred text
New World Translation of the Scriptures
Other texts
The Watchtower; Awake!
Original language
English
Clergy/leaders
Elders
Organization
Body of elders supervises a congregation of up to 200 members.
About 20 congregations form a circuit, 10 circuits form a district.
Highest authority is governing body of elders at Brooklyn headquarters. {2}
Meeting place
Kingdom Hall
Theism
Strict monotheism
Jesus
The Son of God, God's first creation
Ultimate reality
Jehovah God
Human nature
Sinful since Adam
Purpose of life
Live forever after death instead of being annihilated
How to live
Live morally and in accordance with Jehovah's commandments, spread the
good news of the Kingdom to others.
Afterlife
144,000 elect will reign in heaven and have spirit bodies. Other Witnesses will
live forever on a restore paradise on earth. All others will be annihilated. Hell
does not exist. {3}
Symbols
The watchtower. Cross rejected as a pagan symbol.
Major holidays
Memorial of Christ's death, celebrated annually. All Christian or other
religious-based holidays are rejected as unbiblical and pagan.
Ethics
Divorce only in cases of adultery, no premarital sex, no homosexuality. {4} No
gambling or drinking to excess. Against abortion. {5}
Practices
No blood transfusions, no celebration of non-JW holidays, no use of crosses
or other religious images. Baptism of initiation, worship once per week, strong
focus on evangelism.
Doctrinal differences
Jehovah's Witnesses have a number of doctrines that differ from those of
mainstream Christianity (Roman Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy and
Protestantism). Some of these doctrines differ on points which are
considered to be of central importance; others are relatively minor. The
table below shows a comparison of a number of doctrines of Jehovah's
Witnesses vis-à-vis those of mainstream Christianity which are
considered to be controversial, and of major importance.
These Witness beliefs are typically considered by mainstream Christians
to be blasphemous or heretical in nature. For this reason, many Christian
denominations consider these beliefs to place Jehovah's Witnesses
outside of true Christianity, often labeling them as a cult in the sense of a
non-Christian religion.
Mainstream Christian teaching
(Roman Catholic, Eastern Corresponding Jehovah's
Orthodox and Protestant Witnesses teaching
churches)[1]
Nature of God
Jesus
The return of Christ to the earth will The presence of Christ began
be physical, and has not yet invisibly in 1914, and has been
occurred. ongoing since then.[9]
Death/Afterlife
Theological bias
The New World Translation has been criticized as either adding or
selectively translating certain portions of the Bible to conform to
Jehovah's Witness doctrine. The criticism of "theological bias" concerns
mostly matters of the divinity of Christ (i.e., that Jesus was God), but also
concerns other matters such as the eternity of the soul or the return of
Jesus to the earth.[30] Some scholars have defended the translation, to
some degree.[31]
The most frequently criticized rendering is that of the first verse of the
Gospel of John:
Blood
Jehovah's Witnesses reject transfusions of whole allogeneic
blood and its primary components (red blood cells, white blood
cells, platelets and plasma), and transfusions of stored
autologous blood or its primary components. As a doctrine,
Jehovah's Witnesses do not reject transfusion of whole
autologous blood so long as it is not stored prior to surgery. (E.g.
perioperative extraction and transfusion of autologous blood.)
This religious position is due to a belief that blood is sacred and
represents life in God's eyes. Jehovah's Witnesses understand
scriptures such as Leviticus 17:10-14 (which speaks of not
partaking in any blood) to include taking blood into the body via a
transfusion.[45] Controversy has stemmed, however, from what
critics state are inconsistencies in Witness policies on blood.
Animal blood
The Watchtower has stated that "Various medical products have
been obtained from biological sources, either animal or human ...
Such commercialization of ... blood is hardly tempting for true
Christians, who guide their thinking by God's perfect law. Our
Creator views blood as sacred, representing God-given life ...
blood removed from a creature was to be poured out on the
ground, disposed of."[59]
Race
The other side of the seeming racial harmony of the Watchtower
can be traced back to their early history. Although the
Watchtower claims to believe that all races are biological
brothers, all descendants of Adam and Eve, they have for
decades officially taught the doctrine of biological inferiority of
the black race (Bergman, 1984). Formal segregation of blacks
was once rigidly enforced in their organization, both during the
rule of their first president, C.T. Russell (1852-1916) and their
second, Joseph F. Rutherford (1869-1942) and even until the
late 1950's:
Recognizing that it meant either the success or the failure of
the...[Photo] Drama as respects the whites, we have been
compelled to assign the colored friends to the gallery... Some were
offended at this arrangement. We have received numerous letters
from the colored friends, some claiming that it is not right to make
a difference, others indignantly and bitterly denouncing [us] as
enemies of the colored people. Some ... told us that they believe it
would be duty to stand up for equal rights and always to help the
oppressed.... We again suggested that if a suitable place could be
found in which the Drama could be presented for the benefit of the
colored people alone, we would be glad to make such
arrangements, or to cooperate with any others in doing so[65]
Unfulfilled predictions
See also main article Eschatology of Jehovah's Witnesses
Predictions such as the following have appeared in various
Watchtower publications:[72]
Changes of doctrine
1925–
1878
1927
1878
1927–
1914
1930
within a
generation
of 1914
1930–
1933
1933–
1966
1966–
1918 1975
1975
1919
within a
1975– 1914
generation
1995
of 1914
1995-
imminent
2007
2008 indeterminate
Use of Deception
Among their unique doctrines is a teaching
called Theocratic War Strategy that justifies
deception under circumstances.[124] Essentially
this doctrine teaches it is appropriate to
withhold the truth from "people who are not
entitled to it" and deceive if necessary to
protect the religion's activities since these are
deemed "God's will".
The doctrine condemns lying as "untruths told
for selfish reasons". However it draws a
distinction between selfish deception and
deception to further "God's will". According to
the doctrine, one is lying and the other is not,
though both are deception. Specifically the
teaching stipulates that when under an oath to
tell the truth, such as in a court of law, that it
would be improper to deceive.[125]
Controversy over this doctrine is stirred by
detractors asserting Jehovah's Witnesses apply
this doctrine by lying, for example, in a court of
law.[126]
Internet use
The Watchtower Society has instructed
Witnesses to be careful in the use of the
Internet because of the availability of what
Witnesses consider "harmful" information. This
can include information that is objectionable on
moral grounds such as pornography, but also
information considered to be 'apostate'. The
word 'apostate' is assigned special meaning by
Witnesses, to refer to individuals who leave
their religion over doctrinal matters rather than
the broader sense of any person who changes
religious or political alliance.[127]
A 2000 issue of The Watchtower stated, "Some
apostates are increasingly using the internet to
spread false information about Jehovah's
Witnesses. As a result, when sincere
individuals do research on our beliefs, they
may stumble across apostate propaganda.
Avoiding all contact with these opponents will
protect us from their corrupt thinking."[128] While
Witnesses define the existence of "harmful"
information, critics define all accurate
information valid. What Witnesses consider
"apostate propaganda", critics consider merely
an alternative viewpoint, which must be
considered in order to claim one has a rounded
viewpoint. Witnesses teach that Scriptures
such as 2 John 8-11 apply to such "apostates"
and thus they must, "look out" for themselves
and never "receive" such teachings in any
form.[129]
Critics have stated that this warning against
Internet use is an example of "milieu
control"[130] in which the society controls its
members by restricting negative information
regarding the society.[131] Jehovah's Witnesses
respond to such criticism by stating that branch
libraries, accessible by thousands of Witnesses
and visitors, include books that speak
negatively about Jehovah's Witnesses.[132]
Education
This quotation is typical of many that express
the worry that education and exposure to
college influences will lead one to seek a
high-paying career and the material things that
money can buy. This would mean one would
put less emphasis and time into the work of
preaching Watchtower doctrine and distributing
their literature. Parents are cautioned about
contributing to this attitude, too.
Young people, for example, are easily
influenced by the materialistic outlook of the
world around them, and especially is this true if
their parents are inclined to value highly the
ability to command a big salary in the business
world. As a result, they may set their hearts on
the education that is offered by the world's
institutions of "higher learning." Their desire is
not simply to learn a trade so that they can work
with their hands and not be a burden on others;
no, they want to be in an upper income bracket.
But what is wrong with that? Jesus frankly said
that it would be more difficult for a rich man to
get into the Kingdom than for a camel to get
through the eye of a sewing needle. Rather
than being content with "sustenance and
covering," those who devote themselves to
getting a "higher education" usually want to be
able to enjoy the "rest of the things" that money
can buy.[133]
References
1. ^ See this page for a general overview of the beliefs of various mainstream
Christian denominations.
2. ^ Official link
3. ^ Official link Reasoning From the Scriptures, pp. 136-137, 282-283;
4. ^ Jehovah's Witnesses do not capitalize "Holy Spirit".
5. ^ Official link Reasoning From the Scriptures, pp. 136-137, 361;
6. ^ What Does the Bible Really Teach? pp. 218, 2005, Appendix, "Who is
archangel Michael?"
7. ^ Revelation - Its Grand Climax at Hand, p.148.
8. ^ http://www.watchtower.org/e/rq/article_11.htm. See also New World
Translation#Rendering of σταυρός (staurós)
9. ^ What Does the Bible Really Teach? pp. 215, 2005, Appendix, "1914-the
important year of Bible prophecy"
10. ^ "Reasoning From The Scriptures" p. 199 - p. 208 "Jehovah's Witnesses" –
" they do not exist except in God's memory, so hope for their future life lies in
a resurrection from the dead."
11. ^ Watchtower 6/15/79 p. 29 par. 10 "10 The spiritual resurrection of the
"dead in Christ" in the spring of 1918"
12. ^ "Revelation …Climax" 40 p. 293 par. 26 Crushing the Serpent’s Head "26
We have already noted that “the lake of fire and sulphur” could not be a literal
place of torment. … par. 27 "What befell the two cities is called “the judicial
punishment of everlasting fire.” (Jude 7) Yet, those two cities did not suffer
everlasting torment. Rather, they were blotted out, obliterated for all time,…"
13. ^ Insight on the Scriptures, Vol.1 pp. 905-6.
14. ^ "What Does the Bible Really Teach? ,2005, Appendix "Judgement Day-
What day?"
15. ^ The Watchtower, 2/1/1986, p. 17, ¶ 17
16. ^ What Does the Bible Really Teach? ,2005, Appendix "What is Sheol and
Hades?"
17. ^ "Mankind's Search for God" chap. 15 p. 344 par. 2 A Return to the True
God "And Jesus himself explained why his disciples did not fight to deliver
him, saying: "My kingdom is no part of this world"
18. ^ Watchtower 12/1/06 p. 6 " Indeed, Satan, not Christ, is "the ruler of the
world" and "the god of this system of things." (John 14:30; 2 Corinthians 4:4)
This explains why Jesus will soon eliminate all human governments"
19. ^ Awake 6/8/98 p. 17 … doctrines that come from the devils . . . They will say
marriage is forbidden."—1 Timothy 4:1, 3, Jerusalem Bible."
20. ^ Awake! 6/8/98 p. 17 Is Celibacy a Requirement for Christian Ministers?
"Honorable marriage is a blessing from God. Enforced celibacy has turned
out to be spiritually damaging. Freely chosen singleness, on the other hand,
while not essential for holiness or salvation, has proved to be a rewarding
and spiritually satisfying way of life for some.—Matthew 19:12.*** g98 6/8 p.
17 Is Celibacy a Requirement for Christian Ministers?"
21. ^ Watchtower 11/15/96 p. 7 Does God Require Fasting? "Choosing to fast in
certain circumstances is an individual decision. … We should not want to
"appear righteous to men… the Bible shows that God neither requires that
we fast nor prohibits us from fasting
22. ^ Watchtower 9/15/53 p. 551 Is Monastery Life Christian?
23. ^ Awake 10/8/97 p. 21 "Jesus and his disciples were not ascetics. They
endured various trials and tribulations, but these tribulations were never self-
inflicted.
24. ^ Watchtower 10/15/77 p. 618 par. 10 "Jesus was a man who pleased God
in every respect... But even though he was perfect he was not an ascetic"
25. ^ Penton J, Apocalypse Delayed Second Edition, University of Toronto
Press, 1999, pp. 173-174. James Penton is disfellowshipped from the
Watchtower organization.
26. ^ A Closer Look at the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures, The
Jehovah's Witnesses Bible, North American Mission Board SBC, 2000
27. ^ Rhodes R, The Challenge of the Cults and New Religions, The Essential
Guide to Their History, Their Doctrine, and Our Response, Zondervan, 2001,
p. 94
28. ^ "The New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures", The Bible
Translator, 15/3 (July 1964), p. 151.
29. ^ Penton J, Apocalypse Delayed Second Edition, University of Toronto
Press, 1999, pp. 173-174.
30. ^ Robert M. Bowman Jr, Understanding Jehovah's Witnesses, (Grand
Rapids MI: Baker Book House, 1992); Ankerberg, John and John Weldon,
2003, The New World Translation of the Jehovah's Witnesses, accessible
from this site, which quotes a number of scholars regarding theological bias
of the New World Translation; Samuel Hass stated: "While this work
indicates a great deal of effort and thought as well as considerable
scholarship, it is to be regretted that religious bias was allowed to colour
many passages." Journal of Biblical Literature, December 1955, p. 283
31. ^ Alan S. Duthie stated that the "Jehovah's Witnesses' NWT, which is
certainly not 'filled with the heretical doctrines' ...even though a few
aberrations can be found. ...Some have to condemn out of hand any version
made by Jehovah's Witnesses...because they must be full of heresies...It is
true that there are some heretical doctrines to be found in NWT (eg. the
incoherent polytheism in Jn.1:1,... but the percentage of the whole Bible thus
affected... does not reach even 0.1% of the whole, which is very far from 'full'.
How To Choose Your Bible Wisely, Alan S. Duthie. pp. 30, 216. Jason
BeDuhn stated "While it is difficult to quantify this sort of analysis, it can be
said the NW[T] emerges as the most accurate of the translations compared."
Truth in Translation: Accuracy and Bias in English Translations of the New
Testament, 2004 p.163; J. D Phillips stated, "You have done a marvelous
work..."; Allen Wikgren referred to it as "Independent reading of merit";
Benjamin Kedar , " I find my feeling repeatedly confirmed that [the OT]
reflects an honest endeavor to achieve an understanding of the text that is as
accurate as possible....Giving evidence of a broad command of the original
language ... I have never discovered in the New World Translation any
biased intent to read something into the text that it does not contain."; S.
Maclean Gilmore, "The New Testament edition was made by a
committee....that possessed an unusual competence in Greek." The Andover
Newton Quarterly, September 1966 Vol. 7, #1 p. 25,26; C. Houtman , in
discussing translator bias stated "the [NWT] of the Jehovah's Witnesses can
survive the scrutiny of criticism" Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift #38 1984
p.279-280; William Carey Taylor stated the NT of the NWT contains
"considerable scholarship" The New Bible Pro and Con, 1955 p.75; Edgar
Goodspeed, Robert M. McCoy, Steven T. Byington, Alexander Thompson,
James Parkinson, and Thomas N. Winter also give favorable mention of the
NWT.
32. ^ http://www.watchtower.org/bible/ "In [the] beginning the Word was, and the
Word was with God, and the Word was a god."
33. ^ "[Some] translations use such words as "a god", "divine" or "godlike"
because the Greek word theos is a singular predicate noun occurring before
the verb and is not preceded by the definite article. This is an anarthrous
theos. The God with whom the Word, or Logos, was originally is designated
here by the Greek expression ο θεος, that is, theos preceded by the definite
article ho. This is an articular theos. Careful translators recognize that the
articular construction of the noun points to an identity, a personality, whereas
a singular anarthrous predicate noun preceding the verb points to a quality
about someone. Therefore, John's statement that the Word or Logos was "a
god" or "divine" or "godlike" does not mean that he was the God with whom
he was. It merely expresses a certain quality about the Word, or Logos, but it
does not identify him as one and the same as God himself." -"New World
Translation-With References", 6A pg. 1579.
34. ^ "At John 1:1 the New World Translation reads: "The Word was a god". In
many translations this expression simply reads: "The Word was God" and is
used to support the Trinity doctrine. Not surprisingly, Trinitarians dislike the
rendering in the New World Translation. But John 1:1 was not falsified in
order to prove that Jesus is not Almighty God. Jehovah's Witnesses, among
many others, had challenged the capitalizing of "god" long before the
appearance of the New World Translation, which endeavors accurately to
render the original language. Five German Bible translators likewise use the
term "a god" in that verse. At least 13 others have used expressions such as
"of divine kind" or "godlike kind". These renderings agree with other parts of
the Bible to show that, yes, Jesus in heaven is a god in the sense of being
divine. But Jehovah and Jesus are not the same being, the same God.—
John 14:28; 20:17." Watchtower, 1991 March 1 pg. 28.
35. ^ Murray J. Harris: "from the point of view of grammar alone, [it] could be
rendered 'the Word was a god'..." Jesus as God: The New Testament Use of
Theos in Reference to Jesus 1992 p.60; C.H. Dodd: "As a word-for-word
translation ['the Word was a God'] cannot be faulted..." New Testament
Translation Problems II BT 28, 1977, p.101-2; Jason BeDuhn: "A lexical
("interlinear") translation of the controversial clause would read: 'And a god
was the Word.' A minimal literal ("formal equivalence") translation would
rearrange the word order to match proper English expression: "And the Word
was a god". The preponderance of evidence, from Greek grammar, from
literary context, and from cultural environment, supports this translation"
Truth in Translation 2004, p. 132,
36. ^ C.H. Dodd: "The reason why [the Word was a god] is unacceptable is that
it runs counter to the current of Johannine thought, and indeed of Christian
thought as a whole." Technical Papers for The Bible Translator, Vol 28, No.
1, January 1977; Jason BeDuhn: "The NWT translation of John 1:1 is
superior to that of the other eight translation we are comparing. I do not think
it is the best possible translation for a modern English reader; but at least it
breaks with the KJV tradition followed by all the others, and it does so in the
right direction by paying attention to how Greek grammar and syntax actually
work." ibid, p. 133
37. ^ "United in Worship of The Only True God" chap. 2 p. 17 par. 11 "If
someone feels that it is wrong to use the indefinite article when translating
John 1:1, would he also want it left out at Acts 28:6 according to the King
James Version and others?"
38. ^ Awake! 4/22/05 p. 9 “Bible verses that in the Greek language have a
construction similar to that of John 1:1 use the expression “a god.” For
example, when referring to Herod Agrippa I, the crowds shouted: ‘It is a god
speaking.’ And when Paul survived a bite by a poisonous snake, the people
said: “He is a god.” (Acts 12:22; 28:3-6)"
39. ^ Watchtower 12/15/63 p. 763 "Among the various other ways in which the
New World Translation honors God is by keeping clear from trinitarian bias.
That is why it renders the controversial phrase of John 1:1, “The Word was a
god,” even as other translations put in the article “a” in rendering a like
passage at Acts 28:6, namely, “He is a god.” (New English Bible)"
40. ^ "and godlike sort was the Logos." Das Evangelium nach Johannes, 1978,
Johannes Schneider.
41. ^ Examples include Mantey, Julius, Depth Exploration in the New Testament
(NY: Vantage Press, 1980): "The apostle John, in the context of the
introduction to his Gospel, is pulling all the stops out of language to portray
not only the deity of Christ, but also his equality with the Father. He states
that the Word was in the beginning, that He was with God, that He was
God..."; Metzger, Bruce M., "Jehovah's Witnesses and Jesus Christ",
Theology Today (April, 1953), p. 75: "As a matter of solid fact, however, such
a rendering [the Word was a god] is a frightful mistranslation. It overlooks
entirely an established rule of Greek grammar which necessitates the
rendering, "…and the Word was God"."; Ankerberg, John & Weldon, John,
Jehovah's Witnesses and John 1:1 (Ankerberg Theological Research
Institute, 2005); Bruce, F.F. "Much is made by Arian amateur grammarians of
the omission of the definite article with 'God' in the phrase 'And the Word was
God.' Such an omission is common with nouns in a predicative
construction...'a god' would be totally indefensible." See this page or this
page for a more complete listing.
42. ^ "a frightful mistranslation" - Bruce M. Metzger; "monstrous" - Samuel J.
Mikolaski; "intellectually dishonest" - William Barclay; "totally indefensible" -
F. F. Bruce; "an abysmal ignorance..." - Paul L. Kaufman. See this page for a
more complete listing.
43. ^ For a comparative table see [1]
44. ^ Insight on the Scriptures, Vol. 2, pg. 523-524
45. ^ "How Can Blood Save Your Life?" (1990). Watch Tower Bible and Tract
Society of Pennsylvania
46. ^ "Be guided by the Living God" (Jun. 15, 2004). The Watchtower
47. ^ "Questions from readers: Do Jehovah's Witnesses accept any minor
fractions of blood?" (Jun. 15, 2000). The Watchtower
48. ^ Associated Jehovah's Witnesses for Reform on Blood
49. ^ The Watchtower November 1, 1961 p. 669 Questions From Readers
50. ^ What Does The Bible Really Teach? 2005 P.128
51. ^ [2] [3]
52. ^ Jehovah's Witnesses, Blood Transfusions and the Tort of
Misrepresentation, Journal of Church and State Vol 47, Autumn 2005 p. 815
53. ^ Franz, Raymond. "In Search of Christian Freedom" - Chapter Nine. Atlanta:
Commentary Press, 1991. ISBN 0-914675-16-8. p.732.
54. ^ Awake! August 2006 box on P. 11
55. ^ Jackson, K. & Nazar, A. "Breastfeeding, the Immune Response and Long-
term Health", Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 106(4), 2006.
Available online.
56. ^ Franz, Raymond. "In Search of Christian Freedom" - Chapter Nine. Atlanta:
Commentary Press, 1991. Pbk. ISBN 0-914675-16-8. pp.732.
57. ^ Ivanhoe's Medical Breakthroughs - When Religion and Medicine Collide
58. ^ http://www.watchtower.org/library/hb/index.htm?article=article_07.htm
59. ^ The Watchtower (Feb. 1, 1997) p30
60. ^ Penton, James (1997). Apocalypse Delayed. University of Toronto Press.
ISBN 0-8020-7973-3
61. ^ United States Congress (1943). Declaring Certain Papers, Pamphlets,
Books, Pictures and Writings Nonmailable. Hearings Before a Subcommittee.
62. ^ Penton, James (1997). Apocalypse Delayed. University of Toronto Press.
ISBN 0-8020-7973-3
63. ^ http://www.catholicleague.org/1998report/miscellaneous1998.htm
64. ^ The Watchtower, 1 September, 1989 p. 19
65. ^ Watchtower, April 1,1914:110
66. ^ The Golden Age, July 24, 1929: 702
67. ^ Watchtower, April 1, 1914:110
68. ^ Zion's Watch Tower, February 15, 1904: 52-53
69. ^ Zion's Watch Tower, July 15, 1902:216
70. ^ e.g., Watters, Randall (2004) Thus Saith Jehovah's Witnesses, Common
Sense Publications; Gruss, Edmond (2001) Jehovah's Witnesses: Their
Claims, Doctrinal Changes, and Prophetic Speculation. What Does the
Record Show?, Xulon Press; Reed, David A. (1990) Index of Watchtower
Errors, 1879 to 1989, Baker Books
71. ^ e.g., The Watchtower Information Service; Quotes-Watchtower.co.uk;
Reexamine.Quotes. See also [4]
72. ^ See this page for a more complete listing
73. ^ Russell, C.T, The Time is At Hand, Watchtower Bible and Tract Society,
Inc., 1907 p. 101
74. ^ Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 7, 1917, p. 485.
75. ^ Watchtower, May 15, 1922; Sep. 1, 1922; Apr. 1, 1923; Millions Now Living
Will Never Die, 1925, p. 110
76. ^ Face the Facts, 1938, pp. 46-50
77. ^ Watchtower, Sep. 15, 1941, p. 288
78. ^ Watchtower, May 1, 1942, p. 139
79. ^ Awake!, May 22, 1969, p. 15
80. ^ The Approaching Peace of a Thousand Years (1969) (Watchtower
publication) Available online; see also [5]
81. ^ See, for example, Awake!, Oct. 8, 1966, pp. 19-20; Watchtower, Oct. 15,
1966, pp. 628-631; May 1, 1967 p. 262; May 1, 1968, p. 271; Aug. 15, 1968,
p. 494; Oct. 15, 1974, p. 635; May 1, 1975, p. 285. See this page (starting
about half-way down the page, beginning with "How Much Longer Will It
Be?") for full quotes.
82. ^ Watchtower, Mar 1, 1984, pp. 18-19
83. ^ United...worship book
84. ^ The Watchtower, August 15, 1996
85. ^ Waldeck, Val Jehovah's Witnesses: What do they believe?. Pilgrim
Publications SA. ISBN 1-920092-08-0; Buttrey, John M (2004). Let No One
Mislead You. iUniverse. ISBN 0-595-30710-8; see also some of the books
referenced at the start of this section, and the end of the article.
86. ^ "This "prophet" was not one man, but was a body of men and women…
Today they are known as Jehovah's Christian witnesses… Of course, it is
easy to say that this group acts as a "prophet" of God. It is another to prove
it. The only way that this can be done is to review the record. What does it
show?" The Watchtower, 'They Shall Know that a Prophet Was Among
Them', Apr. 1, 1972, p.197
87. ^ "Whom has God actually used as his prophet?... Jehovah's witnesses are
deeply grateful today that the plain facts show that God has been pleased to
use them. ... It has been because Jehovah thrust out his hand of power and
touched their lips and put his words in their mouths..." The Watchtower, Jan.
15, 1959, pp.39-41
88. ^ From Awake! Magazine: True, there have been those in times past who
predicted an 'end to the world,' even announcing a specific date. Some
have gathered groups of people with them and fled to the hills or withdrawn
into their houses waiting for the end. Yet, nothing happened. The 'end' did
not come. They were guilty of false prophesying. Why? What was
missing? Missing was the full measure of evidence required in fulfillment of
Bible prophecy. missing from such people were God's truths and the
evidence that he was guiding and using them. (Awake!, Oct. 8, 1968, p. 23,
emphasis added)
89. ^ Zion's Watch Tower and Herald of Christ's Presence January 1908 "Views
From the Watchtower"
90. ^ The Watchtower Jan. 1883, p. 425
91. ^ Watchtower, May 15, 1976, p. 297; Reasoning from the Scriptures, 1985,
p. 136
92. ^ Awake! Mar. 22, 1993, pp. 3-4
93. ^ The Watchtower, 15 January, 1892, page 1355
94. ^ The Watchtower, 1 January, 1924, p 5
95. ^ The Watchtower, 15 January, 1993, page 5
96. ^ The Watchtower, 15 July, 1894, page 1677
97. ^ Watchtower, Sep. 1, 1954, p. 529; Oct. 1, 1967, p. 587; Dec. 1, 1981, p.27;
Feb 15, 1981, p.19
98. ^ Ephesians 4:13 The Watchtower, Aug 1, 2001 p. 13
99. ^ Watchtower, Aug. 1, 2001
100. ^ Qualified, 1955, p. 156
101. ^ e.g., 1902: The Book of Ruth is not prophetic. (Watchtower Reprints
IV, p. 3110, Nov 15, 1902); 1932: The Book of Ruth is prophetic.
(Preservation, 1932, pp. 169, 175, 176)
102. ^ e.g., 1917: Apollyon is Satan (Studies in the Scriptures, Vol. 7, 1917)
1969: Apollyon is Jesus (Then Is Finished the Mystery of God, p. 232)
103. ^ See this page
104. ^ See this page
105. ^ See this site
106. ^ See this site
107. ^ Watchtower, Apr. 1, 1919; also Watchtower, May 15, 1933, pp. 154-
155; Jul. 15, 1960, pp. 438-439; Our Kingdom Ministry, Sep. 2002, p. 8
108. ^ Watchtower, Nov. 1, 1956, p. 666; Watchtower, Jun. 1, 1955, p. 333
109. ^ Watchtower, Jul. 1, 1973, p. 402
110. ^ CESNUR
111. ^ Worship the Only True God chap. 5 p . 43 par. 4 Freedom Enjoyed
by Worshipers of Jehovah
112. ^ The Watchtower June 1 p. 11 par. 7 A Free People but Accountable
113. ^ Watchtower, Sep. 1, 1954, p. 529; Oct. 1, 1967, p. 587; Dec. 1,
1981, p.27; Feb 15, 1981, p.19
114. ^ Expert Opinion, S. I. Ivanenko, p. 10 Golovinsky Intermunicipal
Court. Link to full Rebuttal JW-MEDIA
115. ^ Sworn Expert Opinion, prepared by Professor James Beckford,
University of Warwick, Coventry, England, November 1998, p. 2
116. ^ Encyclopedia of religion ed. Eliade M, New York Macmillan, 1987
117. ^ Matthew 18:17, "The local court was situated at the gate of a city.
(De 16:18; 21:19; 22:15, 24; 25:7; Ru 4:1) By "gate" is meant the open space
inside the city near the gate... as most persons would go in and out of the
gate during the day. Also, the publicity that would be afforded any trial at the
gate would tend to influence the judges toward care and justice in the trial
proceedings and in their decisions. (Insight on the Scriptures, Vol 1, p. 518)
118. ^ In Search Of Christian Freedom by Raymond Franz, 2002, and In
Search of Christian Freedom, pp.374–390 'The Misuse of Disfellowshipping',
by Raymond Franz
119. ^ Robinson, B.A (2005). "Jehovah's Witnesses (WTS) Handling of
Child Sexual Abuse Cases", Religious Tolerance.org Retrieved Mar 3, 2006.
120. ^ Tubbs, Sharon (Aug. 22, 2002), "Spiritual shunning", St. Petersburg
Times.
121. ^ "Another Church Sex Scandal" (Apr. 29, 2003). CBS News.
122. ^ Cutrer, Corrie (Mar. 5, 2001). "Witness Leaders Accused of
Shielding Molesters", Christianity Today.
123. ^ "Jehovah's Witnesses and Child Protection" (2003). Jehovah's
Witnesses Office of Public Information.
124. ^ The Watchtower, February 1, 1956, pp. 76-85
125. ^ The Watchtower, August 1, 1957, p. 285
126. ^ Bergman J, Lying in Court and Religion: An Analysis of the
Theocratic Warfare Doctrine of the Jehovah's Witnesses, Cultic Studies and
Review: An Internet Journal of Research, News and Opinion, 2002, Vol. 1,
No. 2
127. ^ "apostates have stopped feeding at Jehovah's table"; "To what have
the apostates returned? In many cases, they have reentered the darkness of
Christendom and its doctrines, such as the belief that all Christians go to
heaven. Moreover, most no longer take a firm Scriptural stand regarding
blood, neutrality, and the need to witness about God's Kingdom.", The
Watchtower, 1 July 1994, pp.10-12; also Reasoning from the Scriptures, p.36
128. ^ May 1 2000 Watchtower p.10.
129. ^ The Watchtower May 1, 2000 p.10 par. 10
130. ^ http://www.freeminds.org/psych/lifton2.htm David Grossoehme on
Lifton
131. ^ Cameron, Don (2005). Captives of a Concept pg 112-113. ISBN 1-
4116-2210-3
132. ^ Bethel catalogue 2000 Jehovah's Witnesses For example: The
Chaos of Cults by VanBaalen, Jan Karel and God is a Millionaire by
Mathison, Richard
133. ^ The Watchtower, February 1, 1967, pp. 75-76. Article entitled
"Fruitful Christians Manifest Godly Contentment", subheading "Do Spiritual
Interests Come First in Your Life?"
134. ^ The Watchtower, March 15, 1969, Article on pages 168-173 titled
"What Influences Decisions in Your Life?". Quote is from p. 171.
135. ^ Awake! magazine, November 22, 1990, article on pages 25-27 titled
"Will An After-school Job Help Me Grow Up?" Quote is from p. 27.
136. ^ Watchtower,November 1, 1992, pp. 16-20.
137. ^ "No Calamity Will Befall Us" (Subheading). (Nov. 15, 2001). The
Watchtower, p.19
138. ^ "Let the Reader Use Discernment", (Subheading "A Modern-Day
'Disgusting Thing'"). (May 1, 1999). The Watchtower, p 14
139. ^ "A World Without War-When?" Oct.1, 1991, pp.5 The Watchtower
140. ^ The Watchtower, 1 June, 1997, p. 17 par. 15: "In the first place, what
lies ahead for the world's false religions that have so often been extremely
friendly with the UN? They are the offspring of one idolatrous fountainhead,
ancient Babylon. Appropriately, they are described at Revelation 17:5 as
"Babylon the Great, the mother of the harlots and of the disgusting things of
the earth". Jeremiah described the doom of this hypocritical conglomerate.
Harlotlike, they have seduced earth's politicians, flattering the UN and
forming illicit relations with its member political powers."
141. ^ Bates, Stephen (Oct. 8, 2001) "Jehovah's Witnesses link to UN
queried", The Guardian
142. ^ Bates, Stephen (Oct. 15, 2001) "'Hypocrite' Jehovah's Witnesses
abandon secret link with UN", The Guardian
143. ^ Letter to Editor - The Guardian" (Oct. 22, 2001) Office of Pulic
Information
144. ^ Letter from United Nations DPI/NGO Resource Centre