Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
T , h
qconv
Ac
Tb
x
r
L
Figure 1. Circular Fin
11
University of Utah
The fin temperature at the base is T(0) = Tb while the surrounding fluid is at T. The
circular fin has a uniform cross sectional area Ac = pd2/4 and perimeter P = pd. With these
physical characteristics specified, the governing differential equation is
d 2 T hP T T = 0
d x2 k Ac
(1)
In order to simplify this equation, the dependent variable T is transformed by defining an excess
temperature q as
(2)
x T x T
Since T is a constant, dq/dx = dT/dx, and eq. (1) can now be written as
d 2 m 2 = 0
d x2
(3)
m2 hP
kAc
(4)
where
x = C1 emx + C2 e mx
(5)
Boundary conditions must be utilized in order to determine the constants C1 and C2 in eq.
(5). One of the boundary conditions is a specified temperature at the base of the fin (x = 0).
(6)
0 = Tb T b
A second boundary condition results from the convection heat transfer from the fin tip.
An energy balance applied to a control surface about the tip indicates that the conduction to the
tip must equal the heat transferred by convection from the tip to the surroundings.
hAc T L T = k Ac dT
dx
(7)
x= L
h L = k d
dx
(8)
x= L
Substituting the general solution, eq. (5), into the boundary conditions, eqs. (6) and (8), gives the
following
(9)
b = C1 + C2
h C1 e mL + C2e mL = km C2 emL C1 e mL
Heat Transfer Lab
12
(10)
University of Utah
Equations (9) and (10) may be solved for C1 and C2. With the constants known, they may be
substituted into the general solution, which, after some tedious algebra, results in
(11)
Equation (11) expresses the temperature of the fin as a function of the longitudinal
location. A typical temperature profile is shown schematically in Figure 2. With the temperature
in the fin determined, it is now possible to calculate the total heat loss from the fin. Note that the
heat transferred into the fin at the base equals the heat loss from the fin. Fourier's law applied at
the base gives
qf = qb = k Ac dT
dx
= k Ac d
dx
x= 0
(12)
x= 0
qf =
hPk Ac b
(13)
b
(x)
0
L
13
University of Utah
minimized. The residual, or error, is the discrepancy between the measured data (qi/qb)exp and the
approximate value (qi/qb)theory predicted by the curvefit equation or modeling equation (eq. (11)).
The residual for each set of data (ei) is
# &
# &
ei = % i ( % i (
%$ b ('
% b '(
exp $
theory
(14)
Since individual errors may be positive or negative, these terms may cancel when computing the
sum of the errors. To eliminate this problem, the sum of the squares of the residuals Sr is used to
assess total curvefit error.
n
Sr = ei2
(15)
i =1
The "best" fit to the data is obtained when Sr has a minimum value, which also
corresponds to the correct value of h. An iterative method is required to find the minimum Sr.
by selecting a value of h using an educated guess. Calculate (qi/qb)theory at each location
Start
using eq. (11) and then use eqs. (14) and (15) to compute Sr. Call this Sr,old. Increment h, repeat
the calculations to determine a new value of Sr,new. Compute the difference Sr,new - Sr,old. The
minimum Sr is found when the sign changes between successive calculations of Sr,new - Sr,old. Note
that if the initial h increment is large, additional trials may be required with successively smaller
h increments to "home in" on the actual value of h. Figure 3 is an example plot of a possible
functional relationship between Sr and h.
2.5
Variance
Sr
1.5
1
17
0.5
0
0
10
20
30
40
h (W/m K)
Figure 3. Example of the Sum of the Squares of the Residuals as a Function of Heat Transfer
Coefficient
14
University of Utah
Objectives
This experiment was designed to demonstrate the concept of a fin as it relates to the heat
transfer field and to present a statistical method for the determination of a physical parameter
such as the heat transfer coefficient. Experience will also be gained in modeling the physical
situation, in the acquisition of data that characterizes that physical situation (and the judicious
use of same), and in the study of a one-dimensional approximation.
Experimental Apparatus
Three one-dimensional fins (circular rods) are provided for this experiment. Figure 4
details the fin dimensions, locations of the type T thermocouples, and fin materials. The distance
from the fin base to thermocouple 1 for the 12.7 mm (0.5 in) aluminum rod, the 25.4 mm (1 in)
aluminum rod, and the 25.4 mm (1 in) stainless steel rod is 4.76 mm (3/16 in), 7.94 mm (5/16
in), and 7.94 mm (5/16 in), respectively. All thermocouples are connected to an A/D unit and
temperatures are displayed using a LabVIEW program. The rods are attached to a stream chest,
which provides a constant-temperature energy source at the fin base.
15
University of Utah
LabVIEW software. The computer interface has been designed to 1) plot all temperatures as a
function of x, 2) list all temperatures in array format, and 3) include an on-screen button that
triggers a screen print for data recording (select number of copies before printing).
1. Select (or the Lab TA will assign) one of the 3 rods that you will use for this lab.
2. Record the readings from all 10 thermocouples along the rod, the base temperature, and the
ambient temperature. Confirm the repeatability of these measurements.
3. After an appropriate time interval, record all temperature readings again. These data should
validate the steady state condition.
4. Plot T (or q) as a function of x to verify that the expected temperature profile was obtained.
5. If there is an obvious error in any of the thermocouple readings (e.g., a thermocouple has
failed) eliminate that data from the data set.
6. If the temperature profile appears to be appropriate, perform the data reduction to obtain the
heat transfer coefficient. Remember to attach a grade sheet to your report
Questions and Items for Discussion
In the discussion of the results the following items should be considered (as a minimum):
1. Plot the fin temperature data in the form (qi/qb)exp along with the curvefit line (data
determined from eq. (11)) as functions of x in order to verify the "goodness" of the curvefit.
2. Was the fin in a steady state condition? Discuss the data used to verify this condition.
3. Discuss the assumption that the heat transfer coefficient is uniform over the entire fin.
4. Compare the calculated value of the heat transfer coefficient with the approximate range that
is typically listed in the literature. Discuss any differences that are noted.
5. The fin used in this experiment is relatively long. For the test conditions, could it be assumed
to be infinitely long? How long must the fin be in order to treat the fin as if it is infinitely
long? Compare the difference in qf for the test case and for the same conditions assuming the
fin length is that required for it to be considered infinitely long.
6. Compute the fin efficiency hf and fin effectiveness ef for the experimental conditions and use
these parameters to comment on fin performance.
7. Discuss the sources of error that may have caused your experimental data to deviate from the
theoretical predictions (refer to question 1).
References
1. Incropera, F.P. and Dewitt, D.P., Introduction to Heat Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 1985.
16
University of Utah
2. Look, D.C., "A 1-D Fin Laboratory Experiment," Mechanical Engineering News, Vol. 28,
No. 4, 1992.
3. Holman, J.P., Experimental Methods for Engineers, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill Book Co., New
York, 1984.
4. Dowdy, S. and Weardon, S., Statistics for Research, 2nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York,
1991.
5. Chappa, S.C. and Canale, R.P., Numerical Methods for Engineers, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1988.
17
University of Utah
Possible
Your Score
Introduction
Purpose of the lab
Objectives
Results
Plot of Temperature vs. x (position)
10
10
Sample calculations
Matlab code
20
Discussion
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
Question 5
Question 6
Question 7
Conclusion
Summary
Format
Single spaced, proper headings, attached grade sheet
Total:
1
5
100
Hand-written calculations are acceptable. Make sure all calculations are legible. Only one data set need be used.
18
University of Utah