Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
Dirt collected with sugarcane is processed and separated from the
juice in the sugar factory by filtration equipment for return to the cane
fields. New technologies over the past decade have enabled performance
improvements to be obtained for this key unit operation. Filter mud
product still contains a reasonable amount of sugar and the transportation
of high moisture mud product has considerable cost. Australias
traditional approach has been to use Rotary Vacuum Filters for
processing and separating mud and other impurities from juice, but in
recent years there has been interest in reducing sugar losses and
transportation costs through utilisation of new technologies such as
Horizontal Bed Filters, Vacuum Belt Press Filters, Membrane Press
Filters and Centrifuges. Increasingly, these alternative equipment are
being installed in new factories. This chapter describes the general
principles of mud filtration theory and mud conditioning followed by a
INTRODUCTION
The removal of insoluble non-sugar impurities from sugarcane juice is an
essential part of raw sugar production and this is commonly achieved through
juice clarification. Lime saccharate and polymeric flocculants remove
suspended matter which precipitate and leave the clarifier in the underflow and
the clarified juice is sent to the evaporators for concentration [1].
The mud underflow from the clarifier typically contains 510 %
precipitate in suspension and 1015 % sugar in the juice. Dirt collected with
sugarcane is separated from the underflow juice by filtration equipment for
return to the cane fields. Historically, Australian factories predominantly use
traditional Rotary Vacuum Filters (RVFs) to separate >85 % of the mud solids
in juice to produce a filter mud product of 7580 % moisture [2], however the
technology landscape is changing.
A schematic of mud processing typically undertaken in Australian sugar
factories with RVFs and their associated equipment is shown in Figure 1.
LC Level controller
CLARIFIER
Bagacillo
Saccharate
BAGACILLO CYCLONE
Flocculant
Injection
water
Primary mud
LC
Wash
water
MUD
MIXER
FILTER
Filter
feed
CONDENSER
Cake
LC
VC
HIGH VACUUM
RECEIVER
LOW VACUUM
RECEIVER
Filtrate
LC
LC
filtrate dilution
FILTRATE PUMP
TORRI
WELL
VACUUM
PUMP
Mud filtration is the last opportunity for the remaining sugar in mill mud
to be recovered. The goals of mud filtration are to: (i) recover sugar and return
it as part of the filtrate to the process; and (ii) maximise mud solids retention,
minimising the amount of mud recycled back into the process. These two
goals are achieved by efficient washing with water.
More recently there has been impetus for improving mud distribution back
to the cane farms in terms of the transport costs and also the wide spread
application of this nutrient-rich product.
As moisture is the major component of filter mud product, processing
options and technologies that allow more effective dewatering (while
maintaining acceptable levels of sugar recovery) are of most interest to sugar
factories.
Although factory mud has nutrient value, the high transport costs to return
it to the cane fields impacts on the distances it can be economically transported
which also can depend on farm application rates. When taking into account
nutrient value, a recent case study found application rates of 100150 t/ha was
more economic than fertiliser application for distances of up to 20 km from the
factory [3]. This was based on fertiliser-replacement value although reduced
application rates were required to economically extend the treated area.
Transportation costs which limit the widespread distribution of factory mud
has led to adverse secondary issues such as the accumulation of heavy metals
on farms in closer proximity to the factory. This can have a negative
environmental impact due to water runoff following high rainfall events.
Increasing the mud solids density in the filter mud product (i.e., reducing
moisture content) can extend the economic distribution and application of
filter mud over a wider area to reduce heavy metal accumulation
(environmental benefit) and fertiliser requirements (economic benefit).
New technologies over the past decade have enabled performance
improvements to be obtained for this key unit operation. Such technologies
have the potential to improve sugar recovery and/or transport distance whilst
improving wash water efficiency. Australias traditional approach has been to
use Rotary Vacuum Filters which are in almost universal use in Australian
factories. Internationally, there has been considerable interest in Vacuum Belt
Filters (VBFs), Membrane Press Filters (MPFs) and Centrifuges.
Vacuum Belt Filters in particular, are increasingly being installed in new
factories, especially in Brazil. For most of these technologies, the mud product
can be described as cake, except for Centrifuges which produces granulated
material.
(1)
where Q is the volumetric flow rate (cm3/s) through a bed of porous material
with cross-sectional area A (cm2), P is the frictional pressure drop (mPa)
across the length L (mm), is the filtrate viscosity and K is the permeability
constant (cm2). However, the sugar industry generally uses a more functional
form of Darcys Law for quantifying RVF performance. The functional form
includes specific cake resistance which is inversely related to permeability [4]
as follows:
(2)
5
(3)
where is the porosity (fraction of void volume), Sv is the specific surface area
and k is most commonly assumed to be a constant. The underlying theory for
the Kozeny Carman relation relates to the assumption of the flow of water
through capillaries. The Kozeny-Carman relation can be derived from
Poiseulles Law for flow through long cylindrical pipes [5].
The traditional approach to quantifying cake resistance vis a vis Darcys
Law increases theoretical complexity for new mud filtration technologies that
are not operating under steady-state conditions. Dynamic filtration of porous
media involves interaction between the compression and permeability of the
media; as a medium compresses, the porosity, , reduces and the permeability
decreases. The variability of permeability (and cake resistance) with porosity
is shown in Figure 2 which assumes other factors are constant.
Steady-state compressibility behaviour can be determined by:
Ps=MN
(4)
where Ps is the pressure on the solid phase, is the solid fraction (i.e., 1-), M
and N are constants.
FEED CONDITIONING
Regardless of the technology used, feed conditioning is essential for good
separation performance. Mud filter cake resistance is most affected by the
quality and quantity of bagacillo. The term bagacillo is given to the very fine
fibre particles of bagasse which is the fibrous residue of sugarcane after the
juice has been squeezed out. Fine bagacillo improves mud solids retention and
its addition improves porosity. In adequate quantities it can increase filtrate
rate up to 300 %. Low quality bagacillo can incorporate large pieces of
sugarcane rind but these provide no benefit to sugar recovery or porosity (i.e.,
washing efficiency). Following bagacillo addition, lime saccharate has a major
beneficial effect on increasing cake porosity, improving sugar recovery and
providing good mud solids retention.
FILTRATION TECHNOLOGIES
Rotary vacuum filters have changed little over the past 20 years. While
they are the predominant filtration technology employed around the world,
there is a number of alternative filtration technologies used in the sugarcane
industry and these are described in the following.
New technologies may have the potential to decrease the cake moisture
while also increasing the sugar recovery and mud solids retention and hence
increase profitability for Sugar Mills. This section introduces traditional
Rotary Vacuum Filters, and then Vacuum Belt Filters are discussed which are
becoming increasingly popular. Other alternative filter technologies follow,
namely Membrane Press Filters and Centrifuges.
The filter screens are copper, brass or stainless steel and perforated with
~100120 holes/cm2 which are 0.5 mm in diameter [20]. With due care, the
screens suffer very little wear and may be used for several seasons without
being replaced. They are, however, fragile and delicate.
Operation
As the filter rotates, the section which first enters the mud boot is
immediately connected with low vacuum.
The liquid (filtrate) passes through the perforations which become coated
with fine bagacillo and suspended matter. The first filtrate is sent to the low
vacuum receiver (Figure 1). The cake continues to build, until the filter section
emerges from the mud in the filter boot.
After the screen rotates and emerges from the filter boot, it encounters
high vacuum. The juice passing through the cake is more effectively filtered
by its own impurities and by the fine bagacillo which it contains, forming the
necessary filtering surface which builds the cake on the surface of the drum.
This filtrate is sent to the high vacuum receiver.
The filter section is then sprayed with hot wash water. High temperature
wash water is essential since the viscosity of juice is inversely proportional to
temperature and lower viscosity favours filtration [21].
10
The vacuum draws the water through slowly, and is designed in such a
way that the water has just sufficient time, to pass through the cake and to
displace the juice.
Drying commences in the final stage of rotation as the water is drawn
towards the inside of the cake without further addition of water applied.
Finally the filter screens contact a scraper to remove the cake from the
drum. When the filter section is about to reach the scraper, the distributor
valve breaks the vacuum which has held the cake against the filter surface. The
slightest contact of the scraper detaches the cake dropping into a screw or belt
conveyor transporting the mud product to a storage bin prior to distribution
back onto cane fields.
The thickness of the cake is variable, generally 520 mm and depends on
the rotational speed of the drum and mud feed conditioning. The final filter
cake typically contains 0.53 % sugar, corresponding to a pol loss of 0.21.2
%.
The mud feed for filtration and wash water should be >80 C to avoid the
risk of waxes blocking the filter screens and to prevent microbial growth.
(5)
A similar term is used to rate the wash water application to the filters
expressed as wash water loading (
, t/h/100 m2), which is analogous to
mud solids loading and is defined as:
(6)
0.15
0.1334
(7)
where
MSL is mud solids loading, t/h/m2; and
(8)
where
%
%
The relationship between pol % MS and the wash water % mud solids in
cake (
% ) is given by the expression:
%
176.9
34.04
(9)
0.15
%
0.1334
.
6.19
%
%
100
(10)
12
%
1.265
30.78
12.43
(11)
For data collected from a typical sugar factory, the estimated pol % MS
was plotted using the above equation for various mud solids and wash water
loadings to yield the trends shown in Figure 4.
With increasing wash water application rates there is a diminishing return
on improvements in sugar recovery. Increased amounts of wash water also
increases the amount of filtrate which when recycled to the process dilutes the
juice and increases evaporation loads.
Feed Conditioning
Steindl [4] undertook trials to measure the cake resistance for various
levels of feed conditioning. Filtration tests were performed using an apparatus
consisting of a piece of filter screen of approximately 100 mm diameter
connected through a condenser to a measuring cylinder. During a test, filtrate
passes through the screen and is cooled in the small, water cooled condenser
before collecting in the measuring cylinder. The whole apparatus is connected
to the wash filtrate receiver as the vacuum source.
Figure 4. Prediction of RVF performance for various application rates and filter station
performance.
Figure 5. Filtration rate data showing the effects of added flocculant followed by the
addition of extra bagacillo [4].
14
Kruger [22] found the optimum operation of the VBFs was operation with
thin cakes of ~6 mm that allowed more effective cake washing at lower
vacuum levels (2025 kPa (g)) to achieve cakes of 0.5 % pol and cake
moistures of 7075 %. These performance figures are slightly better than
typical RVF operation. Further work on VBFs was discontinued in the mid
1980s due to higher capital and maintenance costs relative to RVFs at the time.
In the 1990s, Technopulp Industrial (Brazil) developed a Vacuum Belt
Press Filters (VBPF) which incorporates an additional press section to the
VBF. Technopulp currently have over 600 units installed in South America.
The Technopulp VBPF is shown in Figure 6 and Figure 7. Following feed
distribution, a filter unit is comprised of three distinct sections:
www.technopulp.com.br.
Figure 6. Schematic of the Technopulp VBPF showing the different processing
sections.
www.technopulp.com.br.
Figure 7. Photograph of an installed Technopulp VBPF installed in Brazil.
VBPFs can process higher solids loadings per unit of filter area than RVF
(approximately 3 x higher). The largest Technopulp VBPF unit has a
processing capacity of 1.21.5 t/h of mud solids (37 m2 of filter area). Current
designs provide for multistage counter current washing for reduced water
usage and higher pol recovery. The VBPFs require slightly similar smaller
footprint area (and unit weight) compared to equivalent RVF processing
16
capacity and would require ancillary equipment such as a larger filter drive,
wash water and flocculant pumps.
Filling. The plate pack of the press is closed and sealed by a hydraulic
cylinder. The membrane chambers are then filled with filter feed
(between the two cloths) by pumping the feed to the unit.
Filtration. The filter feed is pumped into the membrane chambers
under gradually increasing pressure (to a maximum of 56 bar).
Filtrate is forced through the end and inner membrane cloths and is
collected. Over time, the formed cake builds up and the feed pressure
rises to overcome the increasing resistance of the thicker cake. The
cake grows from the filter cloth inwards until it fills the entire
chamber.
Washing. Water is added under pressure to the inner membrane. The
water then passes through the mud cake displacing sugar as it is
directed through only the end cloths where the filtrate is collected.
Squeezing. Compressed air (1520 bar) is added to the inner
membrane which expands to squeeze the mud cakes between the
cloths. Filtrate is forced through the end cloths and the inner
membrane cloths where it is collected.
Drying/flushing. Compressed air is added under pressure into the
membrane chambers to flush out any remaining fluid inside the mud
cake and through the end cloths where it is collected. It also removes
any remaining filtrate. A drying/flushing step may also be performed
both before and after the washing step to flush out the water and feed
from the inlet and filtrate pipes.
Cake discharge and cleaning. The pressure is released and the
chambers are opened. This allows the cake to be discharged by
gravity or mechanical means. The membrane cloths can then be
18
www.andritz.com.
Figure 8. Diagram of the MPF operation.
www.andritz.com.
Figure 9. Typical industrial MPF manufactured by Andritz.
Centrifuge
Centrifuge technology has not received the same widespread acceptance
as RVFs and VBFs but this technology has merit as it can produce a product
with less than 50 % moisture and can efficiently recover sugar.
There have been numerous investigations by centrifuges in the past 40
years by two research organisations SRI/QUT and BSES [2, 24-27].
The first series of trials were conducted in 1973-1976 and the centrifuge
was installed at a factory over a number of seasons.
The technology was later reviewed in 2003-2005. The centrifuges used in
the 1970s investigations had limited capacity and the final economic
assessment favoured RVFs. Sugar recovery was aided by adding dilution
water to the feed or by adding wash water to the bowl, although adding wash
water had a negative impact on solids retention.
Previous Studies
Early investigations identified that although good sugar recovery was
possible, mud solids retention and erosion were key issues.
20
Performance Characteristics
Two Alfa Laval centrifuges with a capacity of 1012 t/h were
investigated. These were a P3400 and a G2 40 unit (Figure 11).
Trials with the G2 40 unit were more successful mainly because of the
higher level of instrumentation, particularly torque monitoring instrumentation
which was useful in providing information about the degree of separation
between solids and liquid within a centrifuge. Final cake moistures of 50 %
were possible. The investigation ultimately found that the centrifuge was
22
slightly more expensive than an equivalently sized RVF and the technology
was not implemented in Australia. Since the 2003-2005 study, Alfa Laval have
developed a G3 unit which it claims is capable of 10 % higher throughput (or
dryer cake) and 40 % lower energy costs [28].
Trials showed that with no flocculant addition, increasing the fibre ratio
increases mud solids retention (Figure 12) but reduces the final moisture
(Figure 13). However using relatively high flocculant levels (~1000 ppm on
mud solids), the centrifuge was able to achieve virtually 100 % mud solids
retention and product of 5358 % moisture for a feed fibre ratio of 0.30.4. At
high flocculant rates, the feed rate to the centrifuge had little impact on mud
solids retention.
Figure 12. Effect of fibre ratio on mud solids retention (no flocculant).
Figure 13. Effect of fibre ratio on the final moisture of mud product (no flocculant).
24
Figure 14. Centrifuge mud spread by gypsum truck during trials [2].
The distribution of mud product onto cane fields is not the only transport
issue. The conveyors, storage and hopper systems are one area that currently
restricts the transport of drier mud products, at least in Australia due to current
equipment configurations.
Some mills add additional water to the conveyors and hopper systems to
improve mud transportability and flowability into the mud transport trucks.
Figure 15. Auger distributor at the back base in the bed of the mud truck.
FURTHER DEVELOPMENTS
IMPACTING ON MUD SEPARATION
Mud Solids Recycling
The juice clarification system employed in the sugar factory is limited by
its capacity to process mud solids. Mud filtration aims to retain as much of the
mud solids in the cake but often the filtrate is recycled back to the process
adding 1520 % of mud solids to the clarification system.
In some overseas factories a separate clarifier for filtrate is utilised to
produce filtrate that is forward processed within the factory to improve juice
clarification capacity and performance [29]. This processing strategy is largely
based on the need to improve overall factory sugar quality and recovery that
results from the detrimental effects of recycling filtrate backwards to the
process. Filtrate can also be added to the mud to condition the filter feed for
improved filtration and reduced sugar losses [11].
Diluted filter feed can produce cakes of high porosity enabling more
effective washing but typically 1020 % filtrate is recycled in this manner.
Automation
26
The filter station is one of the last remaining sections of the factory that
relies heavily on operators to maintain optimum performance. While the
monitoring of mud conditioning characteristics such as mud solids loading and
fibre ratio prior to the filter would provide pre-emptive advantages for
optimising control of the filter stations, such instruments are not currently
commercially available. An alternative is the monitoring of operating
parameters after the clarifier to provide an early indication of filter processing
problems. Key parameters requiring continual operator monitoring and manual
adjustment include the mud-juice interface in the clarifiers and the
conditioning of the feed to the rotary vacuum filters. The mud level can
change dramatically in minutes depending on the quality of the cane supply.
Smoothing out the flow of mud solids within the factory with increased
levels of automation is a good strategy for improving the performance of the
clarifier and filter station. The performance of the clarifier is directly linked to
the performance of the filters through the recycle of soluble and insoluble
impurities in the filtrate and the operation of the clarifier is a critical factor in
achieving good quality sugar. In recent years ultrasonic sonar, fibre optics,
guided wire radar and penetrating pulse devices have been considered for the
measurement of the mud-juice interface level in clarifiers.
However these instruments need to overcome the harsh and specific
operating conditions with a requirement for the mud level transducer to
withstand temperatures in excess of 100 C while fully submerged in cane
juice, the system must be capable of identifying a mud-juice interface with a
density differential of no more than 10 kg/m3 and the system must providing a
signal that is suitable for control, without interference from suspended mud
particles, fibre and moving or stationary clarifier components.
Similarly microwave technology has been considered for indirectly
measuring density and concentration as a gauge of mud conditioning [30].
These two examples show how if these technologies can be utilised,
control procedures could be developed to provide optimal performance of the
clarifier and filter stations.
Rotary
Vacuum
Filters
Final
Mud solids
moisture
Cost
retention
content
Reasonable (0.3
0.4 pol loss %
7580 % >90 %
pol in cane)
Can be
expensive
Reasonable if
high flocculant
Vacuum Belt
used (0.30.35 6070 % >95 %
Filters
pol loss % pol in
cane)
Relatively cheap
especially if
manufactured in
low cost country
Slightly cheaper
than RVFs
Centrifuges
Comparable to
RVF. For good
recovery, require 5060 % >85 %
internal basket
wash
Ancillaries
Medium
electricity
consumption
-vacuum pump
-wash sprays
Higher electricity
consumption
-vacuum pump
- floc pump
-wash facilities
Medium
electricity
consumption
-feed pump
- compressor
-wash facilities
Very high
More expensive
electricity
than RVFs but
consumption
continually
(approx double
improving
RVF usage)
Footprint
Largest
Maintenance
Smallest
Distribution of
mud
Reasonable with
sufficient feed
conditioning. Long
term costs not known
due to limited
application
Good
Excellent
although dust
potentially an
issue
29
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the work of Mr Rod Steindl and Dr. Floren
Plaza for their contributions on the various filtration technologies.
The authors are not associated with distributors of any filtration
technology and there is no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
30
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
N.G.