Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Year Level: 5
Duration: 4 weeks
Numeracy
ICT
Ethical Behaviour
Intercultural Understanding
Cross-curriculum
Priorities (CCP)
Sustainability
Year Level
Content
Descriptors
Literacy
Year Level
Achievement
Standards
Page 1 of 20
Skills
Page 3 of 20
LEARNING OUTCOMES: What relevant goals will this unit of work address? Draw these out of the content descriptors and the achievement standards.
Students will be able to......
Identify and reflect upon current points of view and misconceptons, and the points of view of others.
Compare similarities and differences between geographical locations for e.g California and Harvey, and explore geographical characterisitcs which may make them prone
to bushfire. Identify how people manage and alter the environment and how these changes may prevent or encourage bushfire. Identify and understand that there are
multiple points of view regarding land management, for example the Indigenous Australian ways to use fire versus the European Australian ways of clearing vegetation.
Collate and present (ethically collected and appropriate) data, which contributes to a community of learning about bushfire prevention and response/management, and
the effects of bushfire on the community.
Page 4 of 20
Informative texts supply technical and content information about a wide range of
topics of interest as well as topics being studied in other areas of the curriculum in Years 5 and 6, students communicate with peers and teachers from other
classes and schools, community members, and individuals and groups, in a range of face-to-face and online/virtual environments They listen to, read, view,
interpret and evaluate spoken, written and multimodal texts Use comprehension strategies to analyse information, integrating and linking ideas from a variety of
print and digital sources Re-read and edit students own and others work using agreed criteria for text structures and language features Use a range of
software including word processing programs with fluency to construct, edit and publish written text, and select, edit and place visual, print and audio elements
They make presentations which include multimodal elements for defined purposes They contribute actively to class and group discussions, taking into account
other perspectives Plan, draft and publish imaginative, informative and persuasive print and multimodal texts, choosing text structures, language features, images
and sound appropriate to purpose and audience Use metalanguage to describe the effects of ideas, text structures and language features on particular
audiences Show how ideas and points of view in texts are conveyed through the use of vocabulary, including idiomatic expressions, objective and subjective
language, and that these can change according to context (extracted from AC: English v 8.1, 2015).
Bridging content: metalanguage to present different points of view and describe text structures/ features on audiences; the language features and structures
which signal purpose.
Task description:
Bushfire awareness presentation and fundraising event
Task 1: Students are to create an awareness raising presentation about bushfires. They are to select a preferred method for delivery from: presentation to the class using
PowerPoint or similar presentation software or with posters/charts, adding to the class website, wiki creation, digital infographic e.g. pictochart, Prezi; a video or audio
recording, animation, poem, graphic panels, theatrical production, advertisement, or own creation. This must have a clear audience- is this for the general public, for
other school children or for parents, politicians, etc. The audience is to be identified by the students on their marking sheet. Students are encouraged to complete the
assessment in pairs, but may choose to complete individually. The assessment will be due after the unit of work- week 5 and will be added to the class website for
community learning.
Maximum 5 minutes duration.
Task 2: Students create a fundraising event poster or brochure for the Harvey Waroona fires anniversary. The artefacts will be used as a competition piece (principal to
announce winner after class votes), with the winner presenting to the school at the next major assembly. The artefact will then be used around the school as advertising
material for the actual fundraiser at school in week 8.
Page 5 of 20
Assessment Criteria:
Task 1: students research, analyse and discuss the impacts of bushfires on the environment and the community affected (within an Australian context). The location and
severity is explained, describing geographical characteristics which may have contributed to the event, and others which may have been mitigating factors. Students
research and analyse possible preventative measures and alternative points of view in management, discussing human changes to the environment e.g. farming, clearing
or back burning. Students analyse and evaluate the significance of the impact on the affected community. Students also identify the impacts on the vegetation and
wildlife. Students communicate using subject specific terminology, language structures and textual structures which are appropriate to audience, format and purpose.
The purpose of the assessment is to contribute to a community of learning and awareness as we approach bushfire season.
Task 2: students synthesise and summarise relevant information gathered through task 1, to create an engaging and persuasive brochure or poster. The artefact relates
information about the fundraising event clearly and succinctly to potential participants. The artefact will relay two elements of cause and effect on community and/or
environment. The purpose of the assessment piece is to encourage participation at the fundraising event by drawing attention to the issues surrounding bushfire, as the
anniversary approaches.
Students prior and developing knowledge will be recorded on KWL charts and also of the unit word wall, photos of which will then be uploaded onto the class Dojo page
to document the learning journey.
As ongoing formative assessment, a digital mind map will track developing concepts as a whole class, and the KWL charts will be amended along the way. Draft copies of
work will be written in HASS books, conferencing will provide scaffolding through feedback. Group work will be documented with exit slips and monitored throughout the
unit, supplemented by questioning and observations.
A class website will be created to act as a digital portfolio of learning, but also as a conduit for integrating ICT skills.
Page 6 of 20
Assessment recording:
Class work and discussions: checklists and anecdotal records/ observation checklist, exit slips
Reporting to parents:
A)Class dojo page
B) class website
C) end of year reporting
Feedback:
One to one conferring during researching and planning/drafting phases- feeding back and up
Immediate verbal feedback and positive reinforcement during computer research periods and small group work periods- feeding forward and back
Written feedback on written drafts in HASS exercise books during the editing phases- feeding forward
Success criteria written on board, followed up with visual show confirmations for individual responses and on exit slips for group work-feeding up and forward
Self-assessment:
Exit slips
Using the self-assessment rubric at the drafting stage of task 1 (before publishing)
Using cues to the teacher in response to success criteria on the board (traffic light system for show of hands)
Page 7 of 20
Using the marking rubric to check progress and ask for further assistance if required
Page 8 of 20
Resources
You tube
https://www.youtube.com/wa
tch?v=zQYe3ngG6qs
disasters.
Formative(informal)-for learning:
Disaster mapper
https://emknowledge.org.au/
disastermapper/#/intro
KWL charts- in small groups break off to create a KWL chart for Australian
prompting
exit slips
uploaded to website
and learning
Page 9 of 20
characteristics contribute?
discussion
Formative: questioning,
pair shares
posts
activity?
Whiteboard
discussion
to website.
reliable resources
quality and reliable resources- key points on board and copy down
discussion
http://www.abc.net.au/landli
thoughts.
ne/content/2013/s3767527.ht
environment
posts
exit slips
http://www.abc.net.au/landline/content/2013/s3767527.htm Students
What are the impacts of a bushfire? Who is affected and to what extent?
ABS
http://www.abs.gov.au/aussta
http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/ccb3f2e90ba779d3ca256de
ts/abs@.nsf/0/ccb3f2e90ba77
a00053977
9d3ca256dea00053977
Play snippets from Shire of Harvey podcast. How are we positioned as the
research
http://www.harvey.wa.gov.au
informative?
/bushfire-recovery-
information/
Page 11 of 20
Go through rubric
Research session
Checklist/rubric
research
students complete a drafting
checklist/rubric per pair
7
Rubric
criteria
Students complete self assessment /reflection of entire
learning experience on website
as journal entries
Photos uploaded to website and
also class dojo
Creation of poster/brochure
Rubric
criteria
marked
grades transcribed
Page 12 of 20
Page 13 of 20
Page 14 of 20
Page 15 of 20
Page 16 of 20
Page 17 of 20
context and
Doing pretty
Feeling
or help
well on this
confident
impacts:
community
Vegetation &
animals
Personal or
social
Geographical
considerations:
Need more
Doing pretty
time or help
well on this
Feeling confident
Geographical
characteristics
Human
interventions on
place e.g. clearing
Using geographical
terminology
Language features are suitable for the text format and audience?
Page 18 of 20
NOVICE
Little or no
discussion of
financial
impact
Minimal,
simple or no
consideratio
n to personal
and social
impacts
APPRENTICE
Partially accurate
or superficial
discussion
Discusses
community
impacts
and
significance
of effects
[3]
Attempted
/little focus/
partially
accurate /no
discussion or
evaluation of
the effects
on bushfire
community
Minimal,
simple or no
consideratio
n to personal
and social
impacts
Moderately
focussed/
reasonably
appropriate/adequ
ate reasoning of
the effects of
bushfire to
community
Does not
choose an
Australian
bushfire to
discuss, or
does not
provide any
historical
context &/or
location
information
Uses little or
no
geographical
terminology
or uses
incorrectly
Provides a partially
accurate &/or
reasonably
comprehensive
historical
background &
context of location
and event. Some
elements are
missing
Impacts to
vegetation
&animals
[1]
Discusses
an
Australian
bushfire in
context [3]
Identifies
geographic
al
characterist
ic
Subject
specific
terminology
is used [4]
Thoughtful
consideration,
mostly accurate,
some
considerations
missing
Thoughtful
consideration,
mostly accurate,
some
considerations
missing
Uses an adequate
range of
appropriate
terminology &/or
correctly
CAPABLE
Wellinformed or
detailed
discussion
Perceptive
exploration,
well reasoned
but some
consideratio
ns may be
missing
Wide range
of impacts
on
community
addressed &
/or
reasonably
analysed
EXPERT
Extensive and
precise
discussion
Perceptive
exploration,
wellreasoned
but some
consideratio
ns may be
missing
Well
informed
and detailed
context is
provided
with
historical
information
and details
of location
reported
Uses a wide
range of
geographical
terminology
correctly
Insightful and
logical,
objective and
subjective
exploration of
all
considerations
Insightful and
logical,
objective and
subjective
exploration of
all
considerations
Extensive and
insightful
understanding of the
effects on
community
Highly accurate
and wellstructured
report of the
event and
location,
comprehensive
depiction
Highly accurate
use, diverse
range of
appropriate
terminology,
Page 19 of 20
Identifies
preventative
measures &
human
interventions
to place [4]
Basic or
missing
discussion of
preventative
measures and
human
interventions
to place
Audience is
not identified,
purposeful
language not
apparent or
inappropriate
for text
function ,
does not
adhere to
genre
This text
would only
provide basic
education for
the public
Satisfactory
identification of
some preventative
measures.
Synthesis partially
successful or
missing
Was the
presentation
effective
and
cohesive?
[2]
Some
competence
and skill
demonstrated,
partially
disjointed or
little
effectiveness
Presentation/text
satisfactorily
effective,
reasonably
structured and
generally clear &
thoughtful
Referencing
[2]
No
referencing
made
Collaboration
and team
work is
evident [2]
Minimal or
limited
evidence of
collaborative
work, may be
one sided
Attempts at correct
referencing made,
or incomplete
referencing
Reasonably efficient
and effective
collaboration
Language
features are
appropriate,
audience
identified,
text features
appropriate
[3]
Does the
presentation
contribute to
community
learning?
Considerable
range of
measures
identified but
some may be
missing &/or
evaluation
missing
Audience and
purpose are
clear,
language
mostly
adheres to
textual
features
within genre,
satisfactorily
cohesive
This text
would provide
substantial
education to
the public
Comprehensive
range of
measures are
identified&
evaluated, a
solution or plan
is proposed
text/
presentation
mostly
engaging and
considered,
skilful and
adequate
reasoning
shown
Mostly
accurate
referencing
presentation/text
was consistently
clear, engaging,
thoughtful and
effective,
accurate &
insightful
Clear
demonstration
of
collaboration
and team
work
Highly effective
and efficient
teamwork and
collaboration
Audience and
purpose are
cohesively
addressed
through
consistent
language choices
and textual
features
This text would
comprehensively
educate
someone from
the public
[2]
Accurate
referencing
Feedback:
Feedback which responds to student work would be placed here, responding to their progress over
the unit of work and also the final product. Feedback here would be in a feedback sandwich
style, where strengths about the quality of information and aesthetic components rest either side
of constructive criticism.
Page 20 of 20