Fatherhood

Pastor David Ministries

https://www.tumblr.com/blog/pastordavidministries
October 2016
God has given mankind numerous human relationships which
are similar to spiritual relationships in order to help people
understand those invisible spiritual relationships. The most
important of all is our relationship with God, the Father. God has
decided to portray Himself as a father because He is the highest
authority and also the one who has the greatest love, the same way
that earthly fathers should be to their own children.
However, the human relationship of fatherhood in the US has
been so much changed, weakened, corrupted and twisted that it is
very difficult to properly understand a relationship with God, the
Father. The idea of a father being the highest authority in a family
is completely absent from the modern society in America. In
modern times, the US law itself has given the mother supreme
authority over the children in a family, in the event of a marital
separation. The US government has forcibly stolen the pants from
the fathers and given them to the mothers. Most of the mothers, on
the other hand, are usually more preoccupied with the
advancement of their careers and/or making a lot of money than
about doing any real fathering or mothering. As a result, most
children in the US have grown up with an absence or warped
understanding of fatherhood, and motherhood.
The removal of true fatherhood started from the influence of
Lenin and Marx who had a philosophy that was very humanistic,
atheistic, anti-Christian and socialistic. The denial of all
religions is their most important priority. Faithful Christianity
teaches: Eph 5:23,24 For the husband is the head of the wife,
even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of

the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the
wives be to their own husbands in every thing. also Tit 2:4,5
That they may teach the young women to be ... keepers at
home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God
be not blasphemed. The suppression of male authority over
women is primarily an anti-religious blasphemous movement
against God. The people propagating this movement are satanic.
They claim to be promoting equality in the home, but in truth, they
are promoting female dominance, better known as satanic
witchcraft. In Satanism the woman is the leader (witch).
Everyone who follows witchcraft will not be saved.
Those people who follow Lenin and Marx used to call
themselves communists as a false counterfeit imitation of the New
Testament commune. Acts 2:44,45 And all that believed were
together, and had all things common; And sold their possessions
and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
The purpose of the false modern commune (communism) is a
deceptive attack against Christianity, just like the suppression of all
male leadership is an attack against Christianity. But more
specifically, against the future prophesied commune during the
final outpouring of the Holy Spirit, similar to the commune during
the small outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost.
(Acts 2) (see article on: The New World Order was Prophesied in
the Bible)
The first time this outpouring of the Holy Spirit happened was
on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2), which was like a little
Thanksgiving Day. It was a celebration of the small harvest of the
first fruits of the year at the beginning of the summer. (50 days
after the Passover, Easter) (Exo. 34:22; Lev. 23:15) One of the
things that happen as a result of this small outpouring of the Holy
Spirit was that there came into existence history's first good
commune where all the new Christians willingly shared their
possessions so that nobody went hungry. Acts 4:32 And the
multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul:

neither said any of them that ought of the things which he

possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Obviously, when the big Thanksgiving Day comes in autumn, with
the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on all flesh, (just before the
second coming of Jesus Christ) there will be the best commune in
the history of the world which will include the best sharing of
possessions that the world has ever seen.
The modern communist movement is a satanic counterfeit
attack against this outpouring of the Holy Spirit with its
accompanying commune, thus the name communism. They know
it's coming. It was prophesied in the Word of God, so they've been
fighting against it for many years now. Remember, communism is
primarily a social and anti-religious movement, not a political
movement. (They are mostly interested in dragging as many souls
to eternal hell fire as they can.)
However, don't forget that the communists will also experience
the outpouring of the Holy Spirit,...... and, since the modern
communists reject all religions, they will not have the contamination
from corrupt Christian habits and other corrupt religious habits.
Most modern churches are being run by satanic wolves in sheep's
clothing, who are very active at corrupting Christianity. This would
imply that the communists could possibly serve God better than all
those people who have been contaminated with the bad habits of
modern Christian corruption, that is, provided they are filled with the
Holy Spirit.
Within the last century, all the countries that have adopted a
communist or socialist type of government have always been
very bad. The Soviet Union always had patrols around their
borders to keep their own citizens from escaping. North Korea
even has electrified fences to kill anyone who attempts to escape.
In the US, the patrol at the border is intended to keep people from
entering, not escaping. An influx of illegal immigrants causes many
US citizens to lose their jobs. In the Soviet Union millions of their
own people who would not submit were tortured and murdered.

Back in those days it was very difficult for their citizens to leave
(escape from) the Soviet Union. Over the years they have killed
many more innocent people, by the millions, than the Nazis did in
the Nazi death camps during WW2. (see documentary called: The
Soviet Story)
When they were first getting started in Russia, they propagated
themselves to the masses of poor people as the good guys
against the horrible tyranny of the Russian royalty. They had public
marches with banners that said things like: Brotherhood and
Freedom, Justice, Equality and Bread. Those marches usually
ended by the Czar's police shooting down the people or the Czar's
cavalry trampling the people, crushing them under their hooves,
thereby motivating the revolution. The new communists were using
the widespread poverty and the Czar's mistreatment that existed in
those days as a tool to get the masses of gullible poor people to
assist them rise up and take control of the government. But when
they took control of the government after the Russian revolution
they were worse tyrants than the previous Russian royalty. The
poor people were poorer after the revolution than before. People
starved to death by the millions.
In 1932 Stalin even sent an army to the Ukraine to forcefully
remove all of the food and even take all the seed for the next years
planting, and shoot anyone leaving or bringing food in. The
enormous supply of confiscated food was sold outside of Russia to
make Stalin and his fellow communist politicians rich. After the
hunger took its effect, as they were removing the millions of dead
bodies and dumping them into mass graves, occasionally there
were a few who were still barely alive, but they were thrown in
anyway and buried alive. Hitler was a small mass murderer
compared to Stalin. After all this, why was the United States allies
with Stalin during WW2? The truth is that the US has had
undercover communist politicians for a long time now, who are
satanic wolves in sheep's clothing that love to deceive, conquer and
kill. (like Bush's 9-11, see documentary: Loose Change)

Obamas socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he

received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic
Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat.
According to Cliff Kincaid in Accuracy in the Media, Obama
endorsed openly Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders in 2006.
Obama was later endorsed by the Communist Party USA in his run
for President of the United States. President Obama has openly
suggested Marxist ideologies and has surrounded himself with
numerous outspoken Marxists.
This communist movement has been world-wide. Now, they
have their people infiltrating every country influencing native
communist citizens in those countries to seek positions of
leadership in every area of society. (They normally don't tell anyone
that they are communists.) They are the most powerful social
movement in the world today. It used to be more political, but now
they are concentrating more on social, anti-religious changes.
Make no mistake, the removal of true fatherhood, in the US, was
propagated by satanic communistic philosophy by means of
American communist politicians (who do not publicly call
themselves communists). Their primary purpose is an attack
against faithful Christianity. Communist philosophy is the number
one social, political, media and educational influence in the world
today, especially in America.
Since the supposed downfall of communism (the downfall of
the iron curtain and the Soviet Union) many people mistakenly think
that this horrible communism is dead. However, it has only been
declining in a dominant political sense, not a social sense. The
communists have learned that they can make much more progress
by infiltrating socially and obtaining positions of leadership for social
influence rather than keeping their own people prisoners and
maintaining a bad political reputation. When they were horrible
tyrants, in the Soviet Union, they were showing their true character
without any false mask like wolves in sheep's clothing. Now that
they're concentrating on infiltrating socially, they need very

professional sheep's clothing..... They are pretending to be the

good guys. (see article on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing) But their
true character has not improved. They are still satanic wolves that
love to deceive, brainwash and conquer or kill innocent gullible
people. As primarily anti-Christian social spies, they want to drag
as many souls to hell as they can. Their main purpose is
anti-religious, not political.
Because of the influence of Lenin and Marx, almost every
modern university in the US has a communistic philosophy, but
they don't call themselves communists. Likewise, almost every
modern American politician has a communistic philosophy, but
they don't call themselves communists. Also, almost all the
leaders of the media, TV and movies have a communistic
philosophy, but they don't call themselves communists. Do
wolves in sheep's clothing openly call themselves a wolves? If
they did, then why would they bother wearing the sheep's clothing?
(see article on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing)
Notice it is possible that those politicians, media and
university leaders are not really communists themselves, but they
have been trained (brainwashed) by an abundance of satanic
communist philosophy (propaganda) to adopt communist habits.
Example: the elimination or minimization of fatherhood. They
have influenced American law so that the legal power of fathers
and husbands is at a minimum. Communism must be thought of
as anti-religion or anti-God. Fatherhood is an illustrative
representation of God, the father.
Even the name itself, communism, is a lie. They teach that
they will one day make the whole world one great big commune.
Everyone will all live together and share all their possessions like
one big happy family in peace, love and harmony. They say that
the government, the military and the police will eventually not be
necessary, because the human race will have evolved into the
highest form of living: a commune, where everyone is equal and
they share all the wealth equally.

Make no mistake, no communist government or their social

influence has ever produced a good commune. Having a
government is itself a denial and exposure of their own deceptive
philosophy. The few communes that have been somewhat
successful through history were more like a democracy. It must
also be kept in mind that pure democracy is impractical on a large
scale. In a large government where hundreds of daily decisions
must be made, it would be impossible to have a national citizen's
vote every day on every detail. Not forgetting that managing a
government also bears many similarities to managing a large
business, and most of the common people are very incompetent
business managers. Thus, the need for a more practical
government in the form of a republic, with the spirit of democracy
by the election of representatives who are capable managers.
True pure democracy is an unrealistic myth that can never be
reality. The only democracies that could possibly exist are little
tiny ones in small communities. Once they become larger, they
must be converted into a republic. However, both democracies and
republics on a large scale are usually fake anyway. The real
leadership is usually run behind the scenes by a secret group of
people.
Even though the communists or socialists claim to have
many of the attributes of democracy, there are five main
differences between democracy and communism. (Besides their
reputation for tyranny, brainwashing, torture and murder.)
(Remember, the current movement is more social and
anti-Christian than political.)
First, communism is always atheistic. Their first priority is to
remove all religions, religious practices and religious teachings (like
fatherhood, a father is a symbolic representation of God, the
father), because they are led by Satan. (Once they get the fathers
out of the way, then they can brainwash the children any way they
want.) They want to drag as many souls to hell as they can.
Democracies and republics permit freedom of religion.

Second, communism removes the automatic authority of

men over women because that authority is taught in faithful
Christianity. They claim to promote equality, but in family life it is
very clear that they promote female dominance, which is satanic
witchcraft. Before the modern infiltration of communism within
democracy, in the US, each man was the head and representative
of his family and the only one in each family to vote. Voting for
women was not started until 1920 in the US, which was the result of
the influence of satanic communist propaganda and communist
politicians, who did not openly call themselves communists. The
very essence of voting is that of decision making. Women are
supposed to obey the decisions of the men and not be telling the
men what to do.
Previously, husbands were the leaders and representatives of
their families just as Senators are representatives of their states. It
is no more an injustice for husbands to make decisions for their
wives and children than it is for a senator to make decisions for the
citizens of his state. The purpose of these legal changes is not to
prevent men from abusing women, nor to promote equality. The
purpose is to eventually destroy marriage completely, in which they
have been very successful up until now...... and, which has been a
disadvantage to women by ruining any romance they otherwise
could have had with their husbands. But even highly educated
women can't figure out that modern feminism ruins romance and
family. Feminism turns women into men. (This comment is not
intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that women
need loving husbands to guide them and protect them from
dangerous errors.) (see article on: The Consequences of Women's
Liberation)
Third, communism requires (by force) that everyone share all
possessions and living space, whereas in true democracy sharing
possessions and living space is voluntary. The phrase by force
indicates the absolute necessity of a governmental power in order
to enforce communism. In the Soviet Union, after the Russian

revolution, people with large houses were forced to share them with
other poorer families, without receiving rent. (And most of their
household possessions got stolen in the process.)
Also, notice that the communist political leaders do not subject
themselves to the same regulations as the people they are
governing ,...... or rather, as the gullible people they deceived and
conquered. All of the communist political leaders have always lived
in luxury and kept the best possessions and living space for
themselves. All their talk of equality, brotherhood and
redistribution of wealth is a big fat lie intended to conquer and
dominate unsuspecting schmucks.
Fourth, communism must destroy the family unit. They
cannot allow a mother-father-children family unit, because this also
was established by God and is taught in correct Christianity. Most
importantly, once they get the fathers out of the way and gain
control of the children, then they can raise them (brainwash them)
any way they want. As everyone is required, by force, to share
their possessions and living space, likewise women and men and
children must all be shared equally. Marital commitment (husbands
and wives) and parental authority over their own children cannot be
permitted. The destruction of marriage, up until now, has been a
slow yet very successful process. Their final goal is to destroy
marriage and family completely. They want people to live more like
animals; like dogs that roam the streets.
The removal of the authority of the husband and father was the
first and most important step toward the destruction of marriage
and family. Permitting the women to vote was a denial that
husbands were the leaders and representatives of their families.
Voting, by its very nature, is masculine decision making which is not
supposed to apply to women. Almost all modern women are not
nearly as happy as women were before women's liberation.
Almost all modern women are deceived (brainwashed) into
thinking that these changes are to their advantage. However, the
women's liberation movement has already been equally as much

a disadvantage to women as an employee's liberation movement

would be a disadvantage to employee's and businesses. An
employee's liberation movement would cause the biggest
economic disaster in the history of the world. Despite the modern
higher education of women, they cannot figure out that modern
feminism is a disadvantage to women. (This comment is not
intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that women
need loving husbands to guide them and protect them from
dangerous errors.) Happiness does not come from converting
women into men. God has the true recipe for happiness, and God
says that women are the happiest and healthiest when they are
under the leadership and protection of good and loving men.
The removal of the husbands' authority over their wives and
the removal of parental authority over their children are part of the
same package. You cannot have the one without the other.
Women cannot be liberated from the authority of their husbands
without losing any normal control of their own children in the
process. These changes are no more to the advantage of women
than they are to the advantage of children.
This is kind of like the story of the little hamster who was
desperately struggling trying to get out of her cage by opening the
door. But she didn't realize that just outside her door was a big dog
staring intently at her and licking his chops, just waiting for her to
get that door open. The poor little thing didn't know that she was
much safer and happier inside the cage than outside. This example
is even more applicable to children's liberation than it is to women's
liberation.
To some degree parental authority has already been removed.
The US government spends enormous quantities of money on a
gigantic agency that spends all of its time butting-in to family
matters at the least little report of a neighbor or an acquaintance.
That agency claims to be protecting children from abuse, but in
reality by suppressing parental authority over their own children by
inhibiting the normal application of discipline, they have corrupted

the family environment so that chaos, craziness and/or violence

increases. When correct discipline is suppressed, children get out
of control and chaos/tension escalates. Parents feel more and
more under pressure until they're like a volcano ready to explode,
and as a result, cases of child abuse increase. Check the statistics,
since that agency started protecting people, cases of all kinds of
abuse have gone up.
Many parents live in constant fear that the government may,
who knows when, remove their children from their home...... and if
they ever want to get their children back they are forced to attend
certain lunatic counseling sessions. At first glance, those lunatic
government counselors seem to be people who have never had
children before and just don't seem to understand what it's like to
manage children. But, in reality, when you realize that they're not
interested in fixing any problems, they're interested in ruining
everything, then the lunatic counseling starts to make sense......
and the parents won't get their children back unless they cooperate
with that lunacy.
As a result of these changes, family life, in the US, is much
worse than it was before this movement started. If parents would
only apply correct normal discipline with loving self-control and
moderation at the beginning of their children's misbehavior, then
excessive tension, anger, screaming and violence would not
happen. Pro 23:13,14 Withhold not correction from the child: for if
thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt beat him
with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell. Pro 22:15
Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of
correction shall drive it far from him. Most parents are afraid to
discipline their own children.
Fifth, communism falsely claims to be fighting for the
freedom of poor and oppressed people. The communists call it:
revolution or class struggle. Years ago in Russia, the
communists were helping the poor oppressed people to fight for
their freedom from the tyranny of the rich Russian royalty.

Supposedly, the communists were the good guys. Communism

was something new at that time, and most of those poor people
didn't understand what it was. But really, the communists were
using the widespread intensive poverty that existed in those days
as a tool to fool the gullible poor people into assisting them rise up
and take control of the government. At the beginning, communism
put a strong emphasis on economic equality, claiming that rich
people had an obligation to share their wealth with the poor people.
Anybody who would believe that is a real schmuck!
Later on, especially during the 1990's, the economy all over the
world had changed. That intensive poverty is not nearly as
common now, so it has been necessary for the communists to
change their battle tactics. The talk about redistribution of wealth
has now become obsolete. This is why the Soviet Union was
deliberately dissolved. They are now much more a social
movement than a political one.
It must be noted here that by taking control of the government
they had lost view of their main purpose, which was not primarily
political. (The way they took control of the government in the US, as
undercover political spies, was much more suited to their purpose
and the achievement of their goals.) Their main purpose has
always been to corrupt religions and destroy families and
marriages,...... and that is done better by infiltration as socialistic
spies, like wolves in sheep's clothing.
Immediately after the Russian revolution, as soon as the
communists took control of the government, they were worse
tyrants than the previous Russian royalty. But, that type of tyranny
doesn't exist in the US...... or does it? Isn't the enforcement of
charging enormous and unjustifiable quantities of child support or
alimony tyranny against men? Meanwhile, most men in America
go to work and at least one of their bosses is a woman who earns
more money than they do. The poor men who are low income
couldn't pay both the enormous child support and also their own
basic necessities even if they wanted to. They are forced to either

become street people (this is probably the number one reason for
the high quantity of male street people in most cities in the US)......
or, in order to survive, they have to change their jobs (thereby
losing any good income they had previously, forced to take any low
paying job available), abandon their children, move to a secret
address and use mass transit. (They are denied renewal of their
driver's license or identification in government offices where the
manager and clerk many times are women, who many times earn
more money than the poor men denied their identification. In mass
transit the police never ask for identification.)
Or, in order to survive, those men might also consider moving
to one of the oodles of English speaking countries around the
world. But, they should get their passport before their child
support or alimony debt surpasses the limit of money owed in
order to get one. Canada is the closest to the US. However, they
should do some Internet research about the laws in the country
they want to go to, to make sure they don't fall into the same
problem they have now, all over again. They also must check the
requirements for getting permanent residence in the country they
want to go to, in order to work there.
In addition to this disgrace at the hands of women, those men
are also labeled as criminals or dead-beats or abandoners of
their own children. Sometimes, in those government offices they
even put pictures of men on a bulletin board and are literally
labeled as criminals for owing child support in a government
office where the manager or clerk is a woman who, many times,
earns more money than the poor men who are denied the renewal
of their identification. And to top it all off, if any man refuses to go
along with this crazy malicious system, those government people
who have kidnapped the man's children and then try to steal
outrageous amounts of money to pay for those kidnapped children,
poison the minds of his children by getting the mothers to tell them
that their father abandoned them. Rest assured, this is the
number one cause of the destruction of American marriages,

fatherhood and families. (This thing motivates women to fight

against their husbands) This legalized crime must be
protested in the legislature.
This isn't just tyranny, it's the disgrace of manhood and
fatherhood at the hands of their own wives, legalized and falsely
painted as something good (in the name of protecting children
from starvation) by the government (brainwashing).
Why do communists claim to be freeing people from tyranny
when in reality, all they really want to do is fight against God's
standards, ruin marriages, fatherhood and families....... and
conquer unsuspecting gullible people any possible way they can?
They are doing everything they can to keep fatherhood destroyed.
Fatherhood was already destroyed a long time ago, in the US.
Make no mistake; the majority of US politicians are
communists!! Obama openly endorsed Socialist Senator Bernie
Sanders in 2006. Obama was later endorsed by the Communist
Party USA in his run for President of the United States. President
Obama has openly suggested Marxist ideologies and has
surrounded himself with numerous outspoken Marxists.

In the US, due to the influence of satanic communist

propaganda and the secretly communist American politicians, the
law states that, in the event of a marital separation, the children
automatically go to the mother. But, the father may visit his
children. In a society that claims to treat people with equality this
law is clearly not equal. They don't care about equality; they
want to destroy marriage, fatherhood and families. Isn't the US
supposed to be a free country? Are people not permitted to protest
against unjust laws? Even the men who don't believe in male
supremacy over their wives should at least demand equality, but the
only men who actually protest this injustice are individual fathers
who have to battle it out in court for custody of their own children.
This legalized crime needs to be fought in the legislature; it should

not be necessary to go through the ugly ordeal of battling it out for

each individual case.
The only time the men are given a break is when the mother is
also a bread winner. However, in most of those cases the mother
was more of a father to the children than the husband was. That
is, they act more like men than the men do; they know they have
the law on their side. In a family where the mother was the main
bread winner she always ends up dominating her husband, as
though she was her husband's mother. Men who practice real
fatherhood don't exist anymore, in the US..... Men no longer
wear the pants in the family. The US government, which acts like
communists, has stolen the men's pants, by force, and given them
to the women. The truth of the matter is that this whole thing is an
absolute disgrace to manhood and fatherhood..... And to protest
it would be an open confession that the disgrace really does exist,
which would intensify its shamefulness even more.
As a result, most men choose to ignore it, or to go along with it
and sugar-coat it by calling it something noble,.... which it is not. To
protest this thing would be like putting on a show saying hey
everybody, come see the big disgrace to manhood, come see the
show, thereby disgracing men even more, like rubbing dung into
the men's faces. The satanic communist men in the government
who are responsible for doing this thing to other men should be
castrated and/or executed publicly.
In a marital separation, true equality would be for the children
to spend an equal amount of time with each parent, and each
parent would be responsible to pay for the children while the
children are with them. Why are there so many people who talk
about equality and yet they don't care about the injustice of
charging men with paying enormous quantities of child support or
alimony? ...... And at the same time denying men from having any
say at all over their own children. This thing of charging outlandish
sums of money and then denying men of any say is just like the
taxation without representation which started the revolutionary

war against England. The authority of the fathers has been

removed. The US government has stolen the pants from the men,
by force, and given them to the women....... and at the same time
demand that the men fulfill their responsibility by paying for the
mess that they have no control over; the mess that the government
caused.
In each state (and in each country) the laws concerning child
support, and in some cases alimony, vary from place to place.
Surprisingly, when they started alimony, over a century ago, the
government considered a divorce to be, what is referred to in
modern times, as a legal separation,.... and that the couple were
still married. A divorce was nothing more than a declaration of
separation, thus obligating the husband to continue to support his
wife. At that time it was very difficult for a woman to get a job that
paid reasonable wages.
The main purpose of the Biblical divorce was intended to
punish a rebellious wife hoping to get her to repent and return to
her one and only true husband. The governmental forcing of men
to support a rebellious contentious wife was extremely unjustifiable
and wrong. A rebellious contentious wife needs punishment, not
reward. In modern times, it is no more difficult for a woman to get a
good paying job than a man, thus alimony is now even more of an
extreme injustice than it was before..... And should be completely
outlawed. Some states, in the US, have already outlawed
alimony.
Since child support is usually at least double the quantity of
what is really necessary to support a child, its purpose really
functions as both child support and alimony at the same time.
Separated mothers can usually live without working from the child
support with just one child, accompanied with other government
support such as food stamps and rent assistance, etc. With more
than one child the separated mothers can live quite well, take care
of the children and never have to work.
In some cases, government paid child support turns into

government supported prostitution. (When the mother is not

married to the father of the children, and the whereabouts of the
father is unknown. The taxpayers end up supporting the whole
family generously. Sometimes the father even lives with them, but
the mother tells the government that his whereabouts are unknown.
Those families end up living quite well, sponging off the taxpayers,
and they never have to work.)
The few small groups that have been making slow progress
against the legalized crime of charging fathers with enormous child
support are usually just dealing with cases of individual fathers
battling it out in court about getting custody of their own children, for
which they are still forced to go through an ugly ordeal of battling it
out in court for each individual case. Whereas, they should not be
as concerned about battling it out in court for each individual case
as they should be about trying to change this unjust crime (law) for
all cases in the legislature. The governmental resistance to remove
this crime from US law is due to the fact that the majority of them
are satanic communists and they are intent on destroying families
in the US. They know perfectly well what they are doing and why
they are doing it. They know that this crime (law) is very effective at
destroying families, fatherhood and marriages.
Child support and alimony are not only theft of outlandish
sums of money, they are the theft of the authority of fatherhood,
husband-hood and manhood. This is just like the taxation
without representation in the colonies that started the revolutionary
war against England. Why are men charged with the responsibility
of paying enormous quantities of money and yet they are denied
any say or authority in the matter? The people who did this are not
interested in equality! They are not interested in preventing poor
innocent children from starving to death. They are not interested in
stopping tyranny against women or anyone else. This is tyranny
against men. This is the same type of lie they told the poor people
in Russia when they were fighting the oppression of the Russian
royalty during the Russian revolution. They were really just

interested in getting the poor people to help them take control of the
government, after which, they were worse tyrants than the previous
Russian royalty.
They are primarily interested in fighting against God's
standards and fighting against the salvation of people's souls. The
satanic religion has women for leaders (witches) because the
faithful Christian religion has men for leaders. (see article on:
Salvation) Christian churches that have women for leaders over
men are really churches of Satan masquerading as Christians.
They love to corrupt Christianity. 1Tim. 2:11,12 Let the woman
learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to
teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
1Cor. 14:34,35 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it
is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be
under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any
thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for
women to speak in the church. Why is female leadership over
men a shame (disgrace) for men? Because God himself
established that those leadership positions are, by their very nature,
MASCULINE! Modern feminism trains women to act like men.
(see article on: The Consequences of Women's Liberation)
Women in politics should be thought of in the same category
and the same nature as same gender romances (or marriages).
Gender role reversal causes physical desire confusion in many
people. In the Bible, God rained fire down from heaven on Sodom
and Gomorrah for this sin. Gen. 19 The punishment for this sin is
supposed to be death. Lev. 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind,
as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an
abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be
upon them. If someone says that God is wrong, they are speaking
BLASPHEMY!!! God is the one who makes the rules! Especially
what happens to people after they die. (see article on: The
Consequences of Women's Liberation)
Back in the 60's, most of the people who were against the

women's liberation movement also thought that it would cause a

considerable increase in sodomy, along with many other
abnormalities. According to Louis Crompton, Ph.D. on early
American history, referring to this abomination....... in 1776, in the
original 13 colonies was universally subject to the death penalty.
However, later on, the penalty for this crime was reduced to
long-term imprisonment. As time went by, little by little, the US
government decreased the punishment for this crime to less and
less time in prison. Eventually, they completely repealed all the
laws against it.
The subject of same gender marriages is not necessarily
about the legalization of that type of marriage. It is about the
natural human reaction to the practice of giving women dominant
positions over men, like female bosses over men at work or female
politicians. (.from the position of president all the way down to the
drivers license clerk who gives men permission to drive.) Gender
role reversal alters most people's physical desires. Most people
exposed to this abnormality don't know if they're more attracted to
the opposite gender, their own gender, both or neither. The whole
idea of female politicians and bosses over men goes hand in hand
with raising many people's attraction to their own gender, thus
increasing the quantity of same gender romances, who eventually
start living together as a result. Female politicians and bosses over
men are equally abnormal and responsible for same gender
romantic relationships >>> cause and effect.
A good example in the Bible of one of those woman religious
and political leaders was Jezebel, the wife of King Ahab, who had
spread the worship of the false god Baal in Israel. The end of that
accursed woman would be a very fitting end of all those women
pastors in churches corrupting Christianity. (And female bosses
over men and politicians, too.) The man Jehu had her thrown down
out of an upper window of a building, then he had his chariot horses
trample her under their hooves, crushing her bones like what
happened to the villain during the Roman chariot race in the film

Ben-Hur. Then the dogs came and ate her. She never had a
funeral or a burial. 2Ki 9:36, 37 ...And he said, This is the word
of the LORD, which he spake by his servant (prophet) Elijah the
Tishbite, saying, In the portion of Jezreel shall dogs eat the flesh of
Jezebel: 37 And the carcase of Jezebel shall be as dung upon the
face of the field..... So that, if anyone in those days saw some dog
droppings laying on the ground they might say, there lies Jezebel,
as though they were looking at her grave and mocking her...... The
mocking accompanied with laughter would be even more
appropriate!!!
Responsibility and authority go together. Responsibility without
authority is corruption which causes mental illness. Try to imagine
an absurd and unbelievable situation of a manager in a business
who has absolutely no authority whatsoever to give orders to any of
the employees. Uncontrolled employees produce chaos and
usually do very little or no work at all. Would a powerless manager
then be responsible for that chaos or lack of work? Certainly not!
Applying the responsibility of that chaos to a powerless manager is
extremely crazy...... and gets people in such circumstances to go
crazy.
In real life, men have been denied the authority that goes with
the responsibility that they have been charged with. Men are
expected to be responsible, yet they are denied the authority
which is supposed to go hand in hand with that responsibility.
When most men see the lunacy of this crazy situation, they run
away from it. Then, they are labeled irresponsible or dead-beats
by other people. (especially women) Responsibility and authority
go together. Responsibility without authority is crazy,..... and ought
to be avoided. Mental illness doesn't just happen, something
makes it happen. A common real life example of this is how many
men run away from fatherly responsibility, then they are accused
of being the bad guy. But, as long as those fools (mostly women)
want to deny men the correct authority that is supposed to go
along with the package, the real bad guys are the ones denying

the men that correct authority. Responsibility without authority is

crazy,..... and ought to be avoided. Mental illness doesn't just
happen, something makes it happen.
Modern psychology is completely incapable of resolving this
mental illness because they deny its true cause is due to modern
feminism, which denies men of their normal authority. Any man
who attempts taking his proper and normal authority is labeled a
tyrannical woman abuser, whereas a woman who takes on that
same authority over men is never called a tyrannical man abuser,
even though she usually is. She could never be accused of it
because the mere mentioning of it would be adding on to the
disgrace that most men are trying to deny really exists. Most men
refuse to even talk about this discrimination against manhood.
They usually sugar-coat it, and call it something else, and pretend it
doesn't really exist.
However, there are many wives who refuse to follow their
husbands' leadership, yet at the same time blame the husband as
though he is responsible for every problem. Any man who makes
an honest attempt to be a good leader, and actually starts giving
orders is labeled a tyrant. This type of removal of authority and
incorrect application of responsibility is one of the leading causes of
mental illness in the US today. As long as fathers have no authority
over their wives and children it is ludicrous, irrational and immoral
to charge them with the responsibility for family problems. It is
equally inappropriate to charge them to pay money for the mess
that they have no control over....... a mess that the US government
caused, especially in a society that gives women good opportunity
at high paying jobs and puts women as bosses over men at work.
(Notice business employers in the US that openly advertise to be
equal opportunity employers normally have more women
managers and professionals than men. The phrase equal
opportunity in reality means: up with women and down with men,
up with women and down with men.)
This removal of the authority of husbands is all caused by

anti-Christian satanic people working in the government who have

given all the authority concerning the children in families to the
mothers. This is also one of the main causes of separations in
marriages because these laws, which are very biased in favor of
women and against men, thereby motivate the wives to fight
against their husbands. Then, the people in the government who
started this malicious craziness insist on forcibly charging the
fathers with the responsibility of paying outlandish sums of money
for the mess that the government created, a mess the man has no
control over..... and at the same time deny those fathers from
having any say in the matter. (This is the same as taxation without
representation, which started the American revolution against
England.)
How is it that all those people deny that men have such
authority and at the same time demand and charge the men with
the responsibility that goes along with that authority. The mere fact
that they demand such responsibility from men is an open
confession that they really do know that men are supposed to have
the authority that goes hand in hand with such responsibility, yet
they deny it. The people who started it claim to be promoting
equality, but it is very obvious that this is not equality!!! Any of
those people who claim to be promoting equality is a liar.
This is a deliberate anti-Christian attack by satanic people in
the government to sabotage the correct teachings of God. It
produces crazy disorder, mental illness, conflict and contention in
homes. They don't charge men enormous quantities of child
support or alimony because they want to be sure that the children
are always provided for and don't go hungry. They do it because
they want to get wives to fight against their husbands and thereby
ruin marriages, families and fatherhood. This legalized crime
must be protested in the legislature.
Those satanic people working in the government know exactly
what they are doing. They want to destroy marriages, fatherhood
and families. They want to destroy the authority of fatherhood and

husband-hood (men) because God is the one who established

that the husband is the head of his wife and family. Eph. 5:23 For
the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of
the church.... Amazingly, even highly educated women cannot
figure out that these same laws that seem to be to their advantage
have not only ruined their relationship with their husbands,
destroyed romance, but also have ruined their relationships with
their children. (This comment is not intended to insult women. It is
intended to take note that women need loving husbands to guide
them and protect them from dangerous errors.)
The worst offense of all is not the kidnapping of a man's
children or the theft of enormous and unjustifiable quantities of
money to pay for those children. The worst crime of all is the
slander of the man's character by labeling him a criminal
dead-beat or abandoner of his own children if he does not
cooperate with their malicious crazy system. If he does cooperate,
then he ends up being extremely disrespected by his separated
wife and children. He becomes a doormat and loose change......
and a dead-beat even if he does cooperate with their deliberately
spiteful malicious system against men. The wife and children
disrespect him more if he cooperates than if he doesn't.
If he cooperates, he becomes a weakling doormat who goes
along with the injustice done against him. And if he leaves the
situation, then those government kidnappers and thieves poison
the minds of his children by telling them that their father
abandoned them. Whatever the case, the children always end up
with poisoned minds against their own fathers as a result of this
deliberately malicious spiteful destruction of fatherhood.
In addition, there is a slander against all men in general saying
that if they were always the leaders over women and children they
would automatically be tyrants. (Amazingly, women are never
accused of such tyranny, even though they usually are tyrants.
Saying such a thing would only add to the disgrace against men.
The disgrace which most men are trying to pretend doesn't exist.

They can't even talk about it.) The truth is the reverse, the tyrants
are those satanic people in the government who removed the
authority of the men and forced husbands into a disgracefully
abusive tyrannical situation at the hands of their own wives.
Generally speaking, husbands have never ever throughout history
been as abusive or tyrannical to their wives as compared to how
they are being treated now by their wives. Why is the government
so intent on butting-in to where they don't belong? Why is the
government so intent on destroying marriages, fatherhood and
families? (Answer: because they are satanic communists who
want to destroy Christianity, fatherhood, marriage and families.)
This legalized crime must be protested in the legislature.
Most of those rebellious wives always talk as though the
husband is automatically at fault for every problem that exists in
their homes, even after they are separated and the husband no
longer lives with them. They say he is at fault because he is not
there to fix the problems, or that the problems exist simply because
of his absence. When he is there, they deny him the authority to
manage the problems in the manner necessary to fix them. If he
attempts to fix the problems by taking the leadership, as good as
possible, he is accused of being a tyrant. How is someone
responsible for a situation that he has no control over? Is a
manager who has no authority to give orders to employees
responsible for the problems that uncontrolled employee's cause?
Certainly not! This is craziness! This causes mental illness! This
is very simple to understand, yet modern psychology can't figure it
out. (Because modern psychology refuses to recognize that
feminism is one of the main causes of the problems.)
By slandering the man in front of his own children they are
poisoning his children's minds against him. Any child who grows up
in such a crazy situation will always have an uttermost disrespect
for their biological fathers. This is like the loose change principle
of Bush's 9-11 which completely demolishes fatherhood. Just as
the twin towers fell down under Bush's cooperation and/or

supervision, so did true fatherhood fall down many years ago

when this system of corrupting fatherhood and the family was
started. (Watch documentary about Bush's 9-11 called: Loose
Change.)
Any man who goes along with such a twisted malicious system
against men has no right to call himself a father. The best he
could justifiably call himself is a visitor or a big buddy to his
biological children. It is wrong and inappropriate for him to use the
word father. (see article on: Consequences of Using Incorrect
Terminology) There is a tremendous difference between a man
who is merely a biological father and visitor to his children, as
compared to a man who actually practices true fatherhood. The
very nature of fatherhood must be respected as a figure of
authority and love. A visitor has no authority! A visitor
cannot practice true fatherhood! A big buddy cannot practice
true fatherhood! Fatherhood has been stolen by the US
government. The more money and time those visitors or big
buddies pay to support their separated biological children, the
more they will be treated like doormats, loose change,
disrespected by their own separated children and be the object of
verbal contempt by their contentious separated wives.
The churches should lift their voices in protest against such
anti-Christian, satanic and unjust laws, but they don't. The US is
supposed to be a free country,.... and yet, how many people are
there who protest against this injustice? The churches should at
least prohibit their own church members from doing such things.
Church members (rebellious wives) who use those unjust,
contentious and anti-Christian laws against their own husbands
should be excommunicated (thrown out) from the church. This law
is not only anti-Christian and satanic in nature, it is crazy, irrational
and unequal. It is one of the leading causes of the super high
divorce rate and mental illness in the US today. This willful
malicious destruction of true fatherhood is the number one cause
of the epidemic of mental illness, drug addiction, alcoholism due to

bad family conditions (The alcohol works as a pain reliever..... In

this case emotional pain. Alcohol stops the pain 100%. The bad
family conditions cannot be fixed as long as the government is
forcing the problems on the people.) and purposeless suicides
among young people from those crazy homes. This legalized
crime must be protested in the legislature.
Notice that there is a big difference between suicides with a
purpose as compared to suicides without a purpose. Before the
loss of true fatherhood, purposeless suicides were very, very rare.
Among the very few cases that did happen, before the total loss of
fatherhood, most of those cases could be directly connected to
some sort of bad fathering. All through history there have always
been at least a few cases of bad fathers, but there has never been
such a complete absence of true fatherhood as what exists now in
the US today. Without a good father, children grow up with
insufficient love, purpose (guidance and direction) in their lives.
The children end up with emotional instability and lack of purpose in
life.
It is interesting how purpose (guidance and direction), love,
authority and fatherhood are all tied together. Without true
fatherhood, the authority in the home is minimized and/or
perverted. Incorrect authority (rebellious wives who act like
fathers and who act like mothers dominating their own husbands)
produces serious consequences on the purpose or meaning of
life for the children. Even without being taught, children can sense
in their conscience that there is something wrong with a mother
who dominates a father. Lack of purpose (guidance and direction)
is the primary cause of purposeless suicides, alcoholism and drug
addiction. True fatherhood must include a combination of
authority and love. Erroneous authority, such is a mother who
takes on the role of a father, produces gender role confusion in
children which is one of the leading reasons why the children, later
in life, can't seem to decide if they prefer the opposite gender, their
own gender, both or neither. It is against nature itself for a woman

to act like a father. It is abnormal. Even without being taught,

children can sense in their conscience that it is rebellious for a
mother to dominate a father. It is rebellion which teaches their
children to be rebellious..... And then those rebellious mothers
can't figure out why their own children are rebellious..... Either that
or they blame it all on their separated husbands and teach their
daughters that every problem is always the man's fault. This is not
only craziness, but it is blasphemy against God!!!
Most men cannot face the reality of this problem because it is
an absolute disgrace to manhood itself. Most men cannot accept
that what is going on is really what is going on. So, they try to
rationalize their cooperation with this malicious system by insisting
that they are doing the responsible or noble thing by obeying the
law and paying their child support or alimony. Responsibility and
authority go together. Being responsible is by no means the act of
paying for something that a man has no rights, say, control or
authority over.
Try to imagine the following illustration of a man who is being
forced to make triple monthly payments on a car that was taken
away from him. [child support itself is normally at least double what
it should really cost, plus the cost of the original living space before
the separation, in hopes that some day they will return. He must
pay for his children to live in two different places at the same time,
in addition to paying for all the other expenses.] And then they tell
him that he may borrow the car occasionally, in accordance with
someone else's schedule. [He may visit his children, only at the
convenience of the mother.] But, when he does borrow the car,
he notices that they are ruining it with deliberate and/or negligent
mistreatment, and there is nothing he can do to stop it, because he
has no say in the matter. [They poison the minds of the children
against their fathers by telling them that he is responsible for every
problem....... or for abandoning his own children if he decides to
get out of this accursed malicious attack against men.] The car will
probably be completely unusable before the payments are finished.

[Any child who grows up in such a crazy situation will always have
an uttermost disrespect for their weakling go along with it
biological fathers.] Any person who has a car that was taken away
from him is not responsible to pay for that car. The person who
stole the car is the one who is responsible to make the monthly
payments. Any man who leaves such a lunatic situation is not
abandoning anything or anyone. The kidnappers and thieves
are the culprits. How is it that some people can even graduate from
a university and yet they can't tell the difference between
kidnapping (accompanied with extortion) and abandonment?
Some people might say that the purpose of the forced child
support is that some men are just plain irresponsible and abandon
their responsibility for their own children. However, that is not a
rightful accusation. This is about the same situation as a man who
signs a contract to make monthly payments on a car, and then
discovers shortly after making the contract that, surprise,
surprise,...... he doesn't have any say over using his own car. He
can't use his own car when he needs it. Why is the authority of the
men denied and at the same time the responsibility, that should go
hand in hand with that responsibility, is forced upon them? Why are
men denied the authority that should be correctly entitled to them?
When men come face to face with this lunacy of being
expected to fulfill this responsibility, yet at the same time denied the
authority that ought to go along with the package, most of them
don't know what to do about it. Many of them run away from it just
like any sane man ought to run away from such lunacy. Mental
illness doesn't just happen. Something makes it happen. Forcing a
man into this kind of lunatic situation ought to drive him crazy.
It may be true that, in some cases, a young man is indeed
immature, (especially the young men who are the second
generation, and product of this craziness) and not ready to handle
the responsibilities of being a father, but that can be helped with
good counseling and training. However, good counseling can not
help if this craziness continues and is not accompanied with the

restoration of proper authority to the man. There can be no

leadership without authority.
Why does the man have no say at the same time that he is
responsible to pay triple? (taxation without representation) Why
does the government have to butt-in where it doesn't belong?
Answer: they intend to ruin families, fatherhood and marriages.
Following such a system is not being responsible! It is not
equality! It is not nobility! This is not what it means to be a
gentleman. This is crazy!!! This is wrong!!! This is immoral!!!
This is tyrannical!!! This is kidnapping, extortion and willful spiteful
maliciousness! This is the satanic communist anti-Christian
overthrow of God's authority and the authority that God gave men
(fatherhood) over their own wives and children! This is the
deliberate destruction of marriage, fatherhood and family done by
evil people in the government with the worst of intentions.
Yet those people say that if men were the leaders over their
wives and children, the men would always be horrible tyrants. The
truth is, that this is a lie used to destroy male authority and those
people who started this dishonest propaganda are themselves the
tyrants against the men! Most men love and protect their wives and
children, they are not tyrants.
Nowadays, the young men who have grown up into adulthood
under these conditions don't even know what true manhood or
fatherhood really is. True manhood and fatherhood are dead
in America! The government has stolen the pants from the men by
force and given them to the women. Men need to be re-trained on
how to be real men. The first thing they need to do is to stand up
and protest the legislature against all those malicious laws against
men. This system is the suppression of masculinity and the training
of women to act like men, which is commonly called feminism;......
the removal of femininity. America is not the Land of the Free.
America is the land of the weakling doormat go along with it men,
and macho acting women.
Wake up men! Motivate yourselves to act like men, not like

weakling go along with it doormats! Protest these criminal laws in

the legislature!! Sad to say, most people won't change anything
until their own Titanic hits an iceberg. Then, it must go down,.....
and no one can stop it. The time to stop it is now. But, sad to say,
most people won't lift a finger in protest until their own ship goes
down. Then, they can't do anything about it; then they have to get
on the lifeboats.
Removing the authority of men over their own children and
then forcing them to pay enormous quantities of child support is
neither nobility nor responsibility, it is blasphemy against God
and a disgrace to manhood and fatherhood! Back in the days when
the US law made black people sit in the back of the public buses,
eat in separate inferior restaurants and go to separate inferior
schools, there were a few black people who had the nobility to
protest. Now that was true nobility! Some of those noble black
protesters went to prison for protesting, but eventually those unjust
laws got changed. If all the black people had protested, all at the
same time, the prisons could not possibly have held them all. If
nobody had protested, then those unjust laws would never have
been changed. The few people who did protest were considered
heroes later on. (see 2014 film about ML King called: Selma.
Also 1988 film: Mississippi Burning. The MLK I have a dream
speech can be found on youtube.com)
However, in the case against men there is an added problem,
in comparison to the discrimination of the blacks. The very nature
of this discrimination against men is extremely disgraceful against
manhood. To even admit that it exists would be like shamefully
rubbing dung in the men's faces. Most men cannot handle this kind
of disgrace, because even to admit its existence would intensify its
shamefulness. So, instead of facing the problem and fighting
against it, most men decide to sugar-coat it by calling it something
that it is not,...... and pretend that the real problem doesn't exist.
At times, some men even handle it by convincing themselves
that they enjoy female dominance. But, a man going along with

female dominance is, in reality, more disgraceful than facing the

problem and fighting against it. Men must learn that facing this
problem and fighting against it will make them real men. Women
will admire them and be extremely attracted to them as being truly
manly. Mark these words!!! Any man who stands up against this
discrimination against men will get an enormous female following!!!
Women love a man who will stand up and be a real man!
Women! If you see a man who is afraid to act like a man, try to
motivate him with kindness at first not to be cowardly, keeping in
mind that he has been brainwashed from childhood not to act like a
real man. But,...... if he still refuses, try kicking him in the butt, like
when you see someone walking along wearing a sign stuck on his
back with an arrow pointing down to his butt that says: kick me.
Women,..... the men need some help. If kicking him doesn't help,
try throwing just a little gasoline on the back of his pants and
lighting it on fire.
Men must not be permitted to continue going on and on and on
pretending that this discrimination doesn't exist. Women! You've
got to motivate the men in just the right way to stop being cowards,
and face the reality of this discrimination against men. The men
must be forced to face this disgrace, and overcome it. If they don't,
rub it in their faces. When you go to the bathroom, put your dung
on a piece of newspaper, bring it out and stick it right in their faces,
and rub it around real good. Or, see if you can think of something
that would work just as good. The disgrace must be on the men
who refuse to protest, and who go along with this discrimination
against manhood. The men who protest should be treated as
manly heroes. (This turns women on. The men who protest should
expect a large female following; women who are in love with their
manliness.)
Above all, the absence of true fatherhood produces a warped
and lukewarm perception of God, the Father, and of true
Christianity. Without a correct understanding of the next life after

death and a responsible obedience to God, the Father's

expectations there really is no purpose to life. Yesterday has
already past. Soon today will be gone. Nobody is guaranteed of
tomorrow, in this life. Eventually, everything in this life will no longer
exist and be meaningless. James 4:14 Whereas ye know not
what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a
vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away.
1Peter 1:24 For all flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as
the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the flower thereof
falleth away The only things that are of real value are things that
last forever, things that are in accordance to God's will. Mat
6:19-21 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where
moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and
steal: 20 But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where
neither moth nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break
through nor steal: 21 For where your treasure is, there will your
heart be also.
True purpose, both in this life and in the next life, which is
eternal, comes from God, the Father. Without Him there is no real
meaning to life. Everything and everyone in this life will soon be
gone. This life is only a temporary test for God to determine what
He will do with each person in the next life, which is eternal. (see
article on: Salvation)
Recommended free Bible software:
www.e-sword.net or www.theword.net
Also free Bible audio recordings at:
www.audiotreasure.com
https://www.tumblr.com/blog/pastordavidministries
or e-mail: PastorDavidMinistries@tutanota.com

OTHER ARTICLES
The New World Order was Prophesied in the Bible
Pastor David Ministries
Marriage Misunderstandings Explained
Pastor David Ministries
The Lukewarm Church
Pastor David Ministries
Salvation
Pastor David Ministries
Wolves In Sheep's Clothing
Pastor David Ministries
Self-Love and Self-Esteem
Pastor David Ministries
Fatherhood
Pastor David Ministries
The Consequences of Women's Liberation
Pastor David Ministries
Domestic Discipline
Pastor David Ministries
The Consequences of Using Incorrect Terminology
Pastor David Ministries
The Role Of Women Throughout History
Pastor David Ministries
The Suffering Of The Great Depression
Pastor David Ministries
The Virtues of the Spirit

Pastor David Ministries

What About Deborah
Pastor David Ministries
Correct Divorce
Pastor David Ministries
Slavery
Pastor David Ministries
The Lie of Evolution
Pastor David Ministries
Angels are Aliens, Aliens are Angels
Pastor David Ministries