The Consequences of Women's Liberation

Pastor David Ministries

https://www.tumblr.com/blog/pastordavidministries

October 2017

When the Bible says in 1Cor. 11:3 .. the head of the woman is the
man.. KJV, it is referring to every aspect of life. Before the womens
liberation movement in the 1960s, men were in charge of almost every-
thing that concerned the general public, in the US. Women did, however,
supervise children or other women (usually under a man's supervision).
Some businesses used to divide the laborers into sections, a woman's
section with a female supervisor and a man's section with a male super-
visor..... And another male supervisor over everything. For example: in the
typical supermarket, every cashier was a woman, with a woman supervisor.
Every stock person carrying heavy boxes and reloading the shelves was a
man, with a male supervisor.
During the 1960's most people referred to the changes in society as:
the women's liberation movement. Now-a-days, most people prefer to call
it the feminist movement, because they don't like the sound of the old title.
However, the new title feminist is really misleading, because it is not the
propagation of femininity, but rather, it is the training of women to take on
what was previously considered to be the masculine role. (previously
considered means that people have now gotten accustomed to different
roles for men and women.) It is the suppression of femininity for women
and the disgrace of manliness for men. It trains women to act like men. But
amazingly, most men treat it as something noble (helping women to
advance),....... which it is not. It is freak perversion, turning women into
men. If women are not permitted to take on the leadership roles that
previously were only given to men, the person responsible is falsely
accused as though they are abusing women. However, this is not any more
abusive than not permitting uneducated people or children to take on those
leadership roles. Women are not the same as men, and should not be
treated as men.
The word abusive must be more clearly defined. If women are pro-
hibited from being leaders of men, it is not abusiveness to women. It is not
1
the least bit harmful for a woman to be denied leadership over men. Is it
harmful (abusive) for an uneducated person to be denied leadership posi-
tions just because they're uneducated? The uneducated laborers who earn
reasonable wages are usually happier in life than the business managers,
professional people or politicians. Being a leader is not where happiness
comes from. (In fact, many leadership positions, especially in business man-
agement, have certain unpleasantnesses about them that make everyone
not want them, men or women. The only reason those businesses can get
anyone to take those positions is that they pay well.) Deep down true hap-
piness is a gift from God that most people have missed out on, usually be-
cause they're more in love with money than God.
Please, try to imagine for a moment, the same principles of the wo-
men's liberation movement being applied to the work place. Try to imagine
an employee's liberation movement being applied to the work place the
same way that the women's liberation movement was applied to women at
work, management/professional opportunities, politics and family life.
Since, at times, there really does exist some employers who are abusive to
their employees, try to imagine new employee labor laws prohibiting bosses
from giving orders to employees. Generally speaking, how would most
business owners or managers react to such incredible craziness?
Doesn't everyone know that this could only produce uncontrollable
chaos in the work place, with everyone doing whatever they felt like doing or
most of the employees doing nothing at all? What would those bosses say
while they were watching their businesses uncontrollably collapse? Ob-
viously, any business owner in such a crazy situation would have a very
unpleasant reaction. He might even have a heart attack or a nervous
breakdown. But, in most cases he would probably react with hostility. Thus,
the transitional period of the women's liberation movement during the 60's
and 70's had a reputation of hostility, that did not exist before it or after it.
In addition, it ought to be noticed that many men, when faced with the
present lunatic arrangement now being forced on men in everyday life, (es-
pecially family life) similar to this imaginary crazy employee's liberation
movement, most men react negatively typically by shunning any responsibi-
lity or leadership for the modern irrational expectations forced on men. The
modern feminist movement forces men into the same lunatic leadership role
as a business manager in an employee's liberation movement. (An em-
ployee's liberation movement could never be implemented without causing

2
big fat disasters as a result. Why is this so well understood in business, but
it is not understood that the women's liberation movement has already
caused many big fat disasters?) Managers are required to lead, but in the
case of husbands, they are denied the authority to give orders. If a woman
is not free to do whatever she wants then the man is treated as though he is
abusing her. He is regarded as a villain if he actually attempts to do any
leading, and at the same time treated as being responsible for every prob-
lem that exists.
No business could function under such lunatic conditions. But, some-
how men are expected to take on the responsibility of leadership, yet denied
the authority that goes along with the package. How could a business man-
ager be responsible for the chaos caused by employees he has no control
over? Consequently, in everyday life, most men abandon this type of lun-
acy. Then they are accused of being irresponsible, especially in family life.
In reality, they're not being irresponsible, they're abandoning the lunacy.
This type of lunacy ought to be abandoned. It causes mental illness. Now
that mental illness has become an epidemic in the US, how come nobody
seems to know why? The psychologists can't even figure out why. It's as
simple to understand as an employee's liberation movement, yet they can't
figure it out.
Everybody knows that an employee's liberation movement would ruin
almost every business in America. It would be a disadvantage to employ-
ees equally as much as the women's liberation movement has already
been a disadvantage to women. An employee's liberation movement
would cause the worst economic disaster in the history of the world. Yet,
now that most marriages, romances and families have been ruined or per-
verted, nobody seems to know why.
Despite the modern higher education of women and the rise of ad-
vanced technology, the morality and stability (emotional and psychological)
of the American society, especially family life, keeps going down every
year,....... and the highly educated women are unable to figure out that it's
being caused by the women's liberation movement. (This comment is not
intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that even highly edu-
cated women need loving husbands to guide them and protect them from
dangerous errors.)
Modern education is unable to stop the rise of bad family conditions,
drug addiction, alcoholism due to bad family conditions, mental illness and

3
purposeless suicides; all of which, more than anything else, are the product
of the women's liberation movement. Modern education refuses to admit
that women's liberation has anything at all to do with those problems,
which is why they are completely unable to resolve those problems.
If the current trend continues, eventually, it will get worse and worse
and worse until it will finally end in disaster,...... definitely. Modern education
is completely unable to stop it from happening. Absolutely, it WILL happen!!
Disaster is coming!!! The women's liberation movement is a big fat Titanic
that MUST sink! Despite the higher education of modern women, they can-
not perceive how the women's liberation movement has already been to
their own disadvantage.
Modern educated women have been trained (brainwashed) from child-
hood that if they don't get a university degree and a professional macho job
like men do, then they must be some kind of losers or meaningless nobo-
dies. They imagine that by getting a university degree and a professional
macho job like men, they will be truly successful and happy! But they're not
happy, (even when they have good paying jobs).... and they can't figure out
why. Their marriages, romances and family lives are usually rotten and they
are never content with their pay. Despite the fact that they're earning more
money, they always want more, always more, always more. No quantity is
ever enough.
Meanwhile, most of the non-educated workers who make reasonable
pay are usually happier in life than those educated macho professional
women. Making lots of money or having a prestigious professional macho
job is not where happiness comes from. Happiness is a gift from God. The
truth is that God designed women to be the happiest and most stable men-
tally, emotionally and spiritually when they have good men for leaders who
treat them well, just like how employee's are happiest and most stable when
they have good men for leaders who treat them well, with reasonable pay.
Likewise, God designed masculinity to naturally take the leadership
over femininity, the same way that business management automatically
takes the leadership over the workers. It was God who established that:
Eph 5:23 .... the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the
head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. However, in the last
100 years or so, there has been a very large group of people anonymously
influencing the entire world to the contrary by pumping negative propaganda
into the heads of anyone they can, any way they can. (brainwashing) They

4
do anything they can to promote the switching of gender roles, which in turn,
confuses most people's physical desires and thereby increases same gen-
der romances and impairs normal straight romance.
It has now become taboo for masculinity to be normal masculinity. Any
man who insists on acting manly is automatically labeled a woman abuser.
Masculinity has now become deformed and it has been pushed upon the
women by the modern feminism movement. Women are being brain-
washed to act like men and men are being brainwashed to act like women.
If any man tries to prohibit women from being men, he is labeled as some
kind of villain, ogre and woman abuser.
The satanic people inside the government, media, educational system
and churches are the ringleaders promoting this modern way of thinking that
all started to make significant progress way back around 1920 when many
changes were made in US law concerning women. The most publicized
change was that women were permitted to vote for the first time in the US.
A little further back, even all the universities were exclusively for men.
None of the universities even permitted women entrance as students, much
less as teachers or administrators. The first few colleges that had women
students were exclusively for women (like Radcliffe). Men were not allowed
in them and they had much different courses of study than the universities
for men. There was no such thing as a female physician, professor, en-
gineer, lawyer, business administrator or politician etc. (These professions
must be considered macho, even today they are macho. Except possibly
for a pediatrician, obstetrician or gynecologist. There may be a few other
exception cases, too.)
The only women teachers back then were teachers of children or of
other women, never teachers in universities over adult male students. Even
Harvard didn't have women as students on the same standing as men for
many years. Instead, they had a special arrangement with Radcliffe, the all
women's university, to be like brother/sister universities, until about the year
1999.
Harvard also has always had a reputation of having very few pretty wo-
men. Male students at Harvard who wanted a pretty girlfriend many times
went over to Radcliffe to find one. The 1970 film Love Story was about a
Harvard student who fell in love with a very pretty student from Radcliffe. (Of
course, when he was asked why he was at Radcliffe he sounded real stupid
when he give a phony reason. The only men there were the few looking for

5
a pretty girlfriend,...... and everyone knew why they were there. Even later
on, as mentioned in the 2010 film The Social Network, they said that there
is a noticeable lack of attractive women at Harvard. Amazingly, even though
they talked about it, they didn't want to show any ugly female students in the
movie. The big offense was that they proposed making a web page that
compared each female Harvard student to a farm animal, and asked the
viewer to vote on which was more attractive (or, the least ugly). Any man at
Harvard who wants to find a pretty wife has to look someplace else. (The
original purpose of Facebook was for Harvard men to find pretty women. In
The Social Network they even showed pretty women being brought in by
the bus-load, from someplace else.)
This is kind of the same thing as if you want to find good athletes at
Harvard. At Harvard, their athletes are always competing, not for first place,
but to avoid coming in last place. (with the exception of the sport of boat
rowing.) They struggle to get second or third from last place, instead of last
place.) In the case of men, the reason Harvard students make bad athletes
is simply because it is human nature that intellectually gifted people are
usually not athletic. In the case of women, when a woman takes on the role
of a man, as taught by modern feminism, human nature dictates that ma-
cho women are unattractive. (Even naturally attractive women develop an
offensiveness in character about them that keeps the men away.) Stran-
gely, despite their higher intelligence, those women cannot figure out that
modern feminism ruins normal male/female romance.
Sometimes, modern men try to convince themselves that they actually
like macho women, because they know that the writing is on the wall, it's
on the agenda, and it has to be. But, as a result of such irrational thinking,
perversion reins. The truth is that this type of man isn't any more attractive
to the average woman than a macho woman is attractive to the average
man.

Women in politics should be thought of in the same category and the

same nature as same gender marriages or romances. Gender role reversal
causes physical desire confusion in most people. In the Bible, God rained
fire down from heaven on Sodom and Gomorrah because of this. (Gen. 19)
(It should also be noticed that the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was
not as much for same gender romance as it was for same gender rape.)
Nevertheless, the punishment for this sin is supposed to be death. Lev.

6
20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of
them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death;
their blood shall be upon them. If someone says that God is wrong, they
are speaking BLASPHEMY!!! God is the one who makes the rules!
Especially what happens to people after they die.
Back in the 60's, most of the people who were against the women's
liberation movement also thought that it would cause a considerable in-
crease in sodomy, along with many other abnormalities. Rom 1:27 And
likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their
lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and
receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet
(fitting). They also had a fear that God would send a horrible punishment
as a result of permitting such behavior. According to Louis Crompton, Ph.D.
on early American history, referring to this abomination....... in 1776, in the
original 13 colonies was universally subject to the death penalty. However,
later on, the penalty for this crime was reduced to long-term imprisonment.
As time went by, little by little, the US government decreased the punish-
ment for this crime to less and less time in prison. Eventually, they com-
pletely repealed all the laws against it.
The subject of same gender marriages is not necessarily about the
legalization of that type of marriage. It is about the unnatural human re-
action to the practice of giving women dominant positions of leadership over
men, like bosses at work over men or positions in politics. (From the posi-
tion of president all the way down to the drivers license clerk who gives men
permission to drive.) Gender role reversal alters most people's physical
desires. Most people exposed to this abnormality don't know if they're more
attracted to the opposite gender, their own gender, both or neither, without
ever knowing why.
The whole idea of female politicians and female bosses over men goes
hand in hand with raising many people's attraction to their own gender, thus
increasing the quantity of same gender romances, who eventually start
living together as a result. (Whether or not same gender marriages become
legalized is a secondary issue. The contamination of same gender roman-
ces is already a problem..... And is almost equally as damaging to society.)
Female politicians and bosses over men are equally as abnormal and re-
sponsible for same gender romantic relationships >>> cause and effect.

7
 But really, what is the advantage to women by having them take on the
masculine role if they have disastrous family lives or lousy romances? Mo-
dern feminism is anti-romantic! (It has a negative effect on normal straight
romances) Why can't women figure out that being trained to act like men
impairs normal romance? But most importantly, what is the advantage to
women by training them to assume the masculine role if they go to hell
when they die? Science will never stop death. Heb 9:27 And as it is
appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Why do so
many people act like they will never die?
The people responsible for starting this movement did it for the pur-
pose of setting a very deceptive trap in order to conquer and manipulate
innocent and unsuspecting people. (Especially concerning anti-religious or
anti-Christian brainwashing intended to drag as many souls to hell as pos-
sible) Brainwashing happens very slowly and gradually, and the average
person doesn't even notice the changes, nor associates the consequences
of those changes to the real causes. The most important negative conse-
quence for this satanic feminism is the condemnation to burn in hell for
eternity; spiritual death........ permanent death in the next life, after this life
is finished.

All of the first universities that permitted women as students on an

equal standing as men had a philosophy that was very humanistic, athe-
istic, anti-Christian and socialistic. All this started from the influence of
Lenin and Marx satanic propaganda. Regardless of the fact that there are
many different groups and variations of this philosophy, the rejection of God
and faithful religious customs is always their first priority, unanimously.
This movement has been world-wide and it is primarily anti-religious and
social...... more than anything else (more than political). Most people call it
communism or socialism.
Back in the days when it was first getting started it was considered very
bad...... and its primary emphasis was on economic changes, like sharing
wealth. (The sharing wealth deception was primarily to get the gullible
masses of poor people to assist them rise up against the government in the
Russian revolution.) Make no mistake, the feminist (women's liberation)
movement was propagated by atheistic anti-Christian communist satanic
philosophy, which has successfully deceived many people into thinking it is
something good. It is primarily a social and anti-Christian movement not a

8
political movement, especially in America. Their primary purpose is to inhi-
bit the influence of every religion in every society. Not just get rid of all the
religions, but also get rid of the religious influence/customs.
For many years, all the countries that adopted an atheistic communist
type of government were all very bad. The Soviet Union always had patrols
around its borders to keep their own citizens from escaping. Right now,
North Korea has the same type of patrols around its borders. North Korea
even has electrified fences to kill anyone attempting to escape. From WW1
until now, the communists have killed more innocent people than the Nazis
ever did in the Nazi death camps during WW2. (Watch documentary called:
The Soviet Story.) The wars in North Korea and Vietnam, back in the 50's
and 60's, didn't just have a lot of killing; they were full of a certain type of
psychological attack that left many of the survivors mentally ill for the rest of
their lives.
In the US, since this satanic social propaganda started, there have
never been so many cases of mental illness as a direct result of the decep-
tive influence of the propaganda of satanic communism,..... and the psy-
chologists can't figure out how to solve it. It has now become more of a so-
cial and anti-Christian movement rather than a political movement. (less po-
litical, more social, anti-religious, to drag as many souls to eternal hell fire as
they can,..... and cause as much mental illness as possible.)
Because of the influence that started from Lenin and Marx, almost
every modern university, in the US, has adopted an atheistic social com-
munist philosophy. They don't call themselves communists, but they act
like communists. They always contradict faithful Christian customs as
much as they can by always promoting customs which are the opposite of
Christianity. The most notable custom is the propagation of putting women
in authority positions over men.
Likewise, almost every modern politician, in the US, has adopted an
atheistic communist philosophy, but they don't call themselves commu-
nists. Do wolves in sheep's clothing openly call themselves wolves? If
they did, then why would they bother wearing the sheep's clothing? (see
article on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing) Notice it is possible that those
politicians and university leaders are not really communists themselves,
but they have been trained (brainwashed) by an abundance of communist
philosophy (propaganda) to adopt communist habits and to go with the flow.
(Especially feminism.)

9
 The worst wolves of all are the false leaders inside the churches, who
call themselves Christians, but secretly they are satanic spies. (see article
on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing) Make no mistake, the anti-Christian cus-
tom of putting women in positions of authority over men, in the modern
society, was the result of decades of atheistic anti-Christian communist
propaganda. (Which is very deceptively a disadvantage to women.) The
poisonous communist philosophy is the most powerful media, anti-religious
and educational influence in the world today, especially in America. (less
political, more anti-religious and anti-romantic feminism)

Even the name itself, communism, is a lie. They teach that they will
one day make the whole world one great big harmonious commune.
Everyone will all live together and share all their possessions like one big
happy family in peace, love and order. They say that the government, the
military and the police will eventually not be necessary, because the human
race will have evolved into the highest form of living; a commune, where
everyone is equal and happy. (see article on: The Lie of Evolution)
This is nothing more than a lie intended to fight against Christianity.
The communists have never produced a good commune with sharing
wealth,...... just tyranny and poverty. It is the communist leaders who get
the wealth,....... while they treat the poor schmucks who helped them rise to
power with only tyranny, contempt and poverty. Even highly educated
women can't figure out that they are duped schmucks for going along with
this deception.
The best commune that ever existed was due to Christian influence in
the New Testament. Act 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were
of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the
things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Modern communism is a satanic counterfeit of a true Christian commune
but with deceptive anti-Christian propaganda intended to defeat Christianity
and to drag as many unsuspecting souls to hell as they can. It is a direct
attack against the future prophesied outpouring of the Holy Spirit, similar to
what happened on the day of Pentecost, along with the accompanying com-
mune mentioned above. (see article on: The New World Order was Prophe-
sied in the Bible)
After all, why is it necessary for them to reject God? Why do they pro-
hibit all religions? Why is the denial of God and good Christian customs

10
always their first priority? Why do they lie about a wonderful commune
where they say everyone will be happy and share wealth, when all they can
produce is horrible tyranny, poverty and hoard all the riches for themselves?
Answer: They are liars from Satan and wolves in sheep's clothing who
want to ruin family life as much as they can and conquer as many unsus-
pecting gullible schmucks as they can.
Why is their second priority propagating female authority over men?
Answer: All male authority over women is faithful Christian custom. It is
also normal human nature. God has created human nature so that male
leadership over women is the condition that produces the most mental sta-
bility and happiness for both women and men. Satan must reject faithful
Christianity. Satan has chosen women for leaders (witches) because God
has chosen men for leaders.
Christian churches with women leaders are really female wolves in
sheep's clothing, and their sheep's clothing is about as fake (unprofes-
sional) as it can get, because it is very clearly stated in the Bible not to do
such things. (There's no room for honest errors,..... only deliberate rebel-
lion.) They love corrupting Christianity. What could possibly be more fun for
them? Their sheep's clothing is unprofessional because the Bible speaks
very clearly and directly against female leadership over men in the church.
1Tim. 2:11,12 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I
suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be
in silence. 1Cor. 14:34,35 Let your women keep silence in the churches:
for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be
under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they will learn any thing, let
them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in
the church. (This does not apply to women teaching other women or
children, provided it is done under the supervision of a man.)
A good example in the Bible of one of those women religious and
political leaders was queen Jezebel, the wife of King Ahab, who had spread
the worship of the false god Baal in Israel. The end of that accursed woman
would be a very fitting end for all those women pastors in churches corrupt-
ing Christianity. (And also female politicians and bosses over men.) The
man Jehu had her thrown down out of an upper window of a building. Then
he had his chariot horses trample her under their hooves, crushing her
bones like what happened to the villain during the Roman chariot race in the
film Ben-Hur. Then the dogs came and ate her. She never had a funeral or

11
a burial. 2Ki 9:36, 37 ...And he said, This is the word of the LORD,
which he spake by his servant (prophet) Elijah the Tishbite, saying, In the
portion of Jezreel shall dogs eat the flesh of Jezebel: 37 And the carcase of
Jezebel shall be as dung upon the face of the field..... So that, if anyone in
those days saw some dog droppings laying on the ground, they might say,
there lies Jezebel, as though they were looking at her grave and mocking
her. Laughing mockery would be even more appropriate!!!
Not only that, but her daughter queen Athaliah was executed almost as
appropriately. 2Chr 23:14,21 Then Jehoiada the priest brought out the
captains of hundreds that were set over the host, and said unto them, Have
her forth of the ranges: and whoso followeth her, let him be slain with the
sword. For the priest said, Slay her not in the house of the LORD. 21 And
all the people of the land rejoiced: and the city was quiet, after that they had
slain Athaliah with the sword. Not quite though,...... Jezebel takes the cake.

Since the supposed downfall of communism (the downfall of the iron

curtain and the Soviet Union) many people mistakenly think that this horrible
communism is dead. However, the communists have learned that they
can make much more progress by infiltrating other countries and influencing
positions of leadership rather than keeping their own people prisoners and
maintaining a bad reputation. (Remember, they are primarily social and anti-
religious rather than political.)
When they were horrible tyrants, they were showing their true charac-
ter, without any sheep's clothing (no mask). Now that they're concentrat-
ing their efforts on infiltration and/or influencing social positions of leader-
ship, (more than they did before) their sheep's clothing has to be very
professional and deceptive. (see article on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing)
When they were first getting started in Russia, they propagated them-
selves to the masses of gullible poor people as the good guys against the
horrible tyranny of the Russian royalty. They had public marches with ban-
ners that said things like: Brotherhood and Freedom, Justice, Equality
and Bread. Those marches usually ended by the police shooting down the
people or the Czar's cavalry trampling the people. The new communists
were using the widespread intensive poverty and abusiveness that existed
in those days as a tool to fool the gullible masses of poor people into assist-
ing them rise up and take control of the government. But when they took
control of the government after the Russian revolution they were worse

12
tyrants than the previous Russian royalty..... And the poor people were
poorer after the revolution than before. People starved to death by the
millions.
In 1932 Stalin even sent an army to the Ukraine to forcefully remove all
of the food and even take all the seed for the next years planting and shoot
anyone leaving or bringing food in. The enormous supply of confiscated
food was sold outside of Russia to make Stalin and his fellow communist
politicians rich. After the hunger took its effect, as they were removing the
millions of dead bodies and dumping them into mass graves, occasionally
there were a few who were still barely alive, but they were thrown in anyway
and buried alive. Hitler was a small mass murderer compared to Stalin.
After all this, why was the United States allies with Stalin during WW2? The
truth is that the US has had undercover communist politicians for a long
time now, who are satanic wolves in sheep's clothing that love to deceive,
conquer and kill. (Like Bush's 9-11, see documentary: Loose Change.)
Obamas socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he
received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic
Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. According to
Cliff Kincaid in Accuracy in the Media, Obama endorsed openly Socialist
Senator Bernie Sanders in 2006. Obama was later endorsed by the
Communist Party USA in his run for President of the United States.
President Obama has openly suggested Marxist ideologies and has
surrounded himself with numerous outspoken Marxists.
Make no mistake, no communist government has ever produced a
good commune. Having a government is itself a denial and exposure of
their own false philosophy. The few communes that have been somewhat
successful through history were more like a democracy. It must also be
kept in mind that even pure democracy is impractical on a large scale. In
a large government where hundreds of daily decisions must be made, it
would be impossible to have a national citizen's vote every day on every
detail.
Not forgetting that managing a government also bears many similari-
ties to managing a large business, and most of the common people are very
incompetent business managers. The common people managing a large
business would produce nothing but chaos. Thus, the need for a more
practical government in the form of a republic, with the spirit of democracy
by the election of representatives who are capable managers. (Also, don't

13
forget that the common people in a real democracy would be very bad at
raising a good army for national defense against any enemy. So that the
real communists can invade and conquer the schmucks who follow along
with their deceptive dupe propaganda.)
Even though the communists or socialists falsely claim to have
many of the attributes of democracy, there are five main differences be-
tween democracy and communism. (Besides their reputation for brain-
washing, torture and murder.) (Remember, the current movement is more
social and anti-Christian, not political.)
First, communism is always atheistic. Their first priority is to remove
all religions, religious practices and religious teachings (like promoting fe-
minism and minimizing manly fatherhood, a father is a symbolic represen-
tation of God), because they are led by Satan. (Once they get the fathers
out of the way, they can brainwash the children any way they want.) (see
article on: Fatherhood) They want to drag as many souls to hell as they
can. Democracies and republics permit freedom of religion.
Second, communism removes the automatic authority of men over
women because that authority is taught in faithful Christianity. They claim to
promote equality, but in family life it is very clear that they promote female
dominance (satanic witchcraft). Any American who knows how much the
laws have been changed heavily in favor of wives against husbands ought
to be ashamed of themselves to use the word equality. Communists have
no interest in equality. And they have no interest in protecting women from
the supposedly big bad tyranny of all male dominance over women. Most
men who are leaders over women are very loving and protective, not abu-
sive. The propaganda that men are always tyrants over women was the lie
they used to overcome male leadership.
The purpose of these laws is not to prevent men from abusing women,
nor to promote equality, the purpose is to destroy marriage completely, in
which they have been very successful up until now...... all this has been a
disadvantage to women by ruining their marriages, romances and families.
But even highly educated women can't figure out this deception. (This com-
ment is not intended to insult women. It is intended to take note that even
highly educated women need loving husbands to guide them and protect
them from dangerous errors.)
The communists were the ones who spread the false accusation that
male dominance over women was always tyrannical. (This propaganda was

14
very strong during the beginning of the women's liberation movement.)
The truth is that men have usually been the lovers and protectors of women,
not the abusers of women. Most men in those days liked to spoil their
wives. Those liars who have been spreading these false accusations are
the ones who want to dominate and abuse.
The first step to conquer a society is to eliminate the male protectors of
the women, which leaves the women insecure and vulnerable. Any man
who has been trained to follow female leadership has already been con-
quered and will be very weak and poor defenders against any adversary.
Also, any military that takes its orders from the common people (as in a pure
democracy) will be very weak and poor defenders against any adversary.
Pure democracy on a large scale is impractical and irrational as a political
structure. The idea of democracy as a means to overcome tyrannical do-
minance sounds good. But, democracy cannot produce quality manage-
ment.
Up until today, when most of the men in America that have been faced
with the reality of the extreme legal biases against men and in favor of
women, they usually try to sugar-coat it by thinking that it is noble to help
women. But, in reality, it isn't any more noble than how the communists
falsely helped the poor Russians to get freedom from the previous tyrannical
Russian royalty in the Russian revolution. The poor people were poorer
after the revolution than they were before. The main deception back then
was that the poor people were supposed to share the wealth of the rich
people. But after the revolution, those poor people discovered that the
communist leaders were just using the poor people as dupe schmucks to
get all the riches for themselves. Communist leaders never share the
wealth, just look at Trump.
Female dominance over men is not noble at all. It is a disgrace to
manliness. Neither is it moral, God says it is blasphemy. (Titus 2:4,5)
Those people who started it were not doing it with the intention of making
women and men equal. That is a lie! Their fight is against God and faith-
ful Christian customs. Women are worse off now than they were before the
women's liberation movement started,...... and they can't figure out that
modern feminism is causing it. Marriages have never been as unstable
and unhappy as now.
In true democracy or republic, before the influence of communism,
each man was the head and representative of his family and the only one in

15
each family to vote. Permitting women to vote was not started until 1920 in
the US, which was the result of the influence of communist propaganda
(brainwashing) and communist politicians in the US, who did not call them-
selves communist. Previously, husbands were the representatives of their
families just as Senators are the representatives of their states. It is no
more an injustice for men to make decisions for their wives and children
than it is for a senator to make decisions for the citizens of his state.
Third, communism requires (by force) that everyone share all pos-
sessions and living space, whereas in true democracy sharing posses-
sions and living space is voluntary. The phrase by force indicates the
absolute necessity of a governmental power in order to enforce commu-
nism. In the Soviet Union, after the Russian revolution, people with large
houses were forced to share them with other poorer families, without
receiving rent. (And most of their household possessions got stolen in the
process.)
Also, notice that the communist political leaders do not subject them-
selves to the same regulations as the people they are governing ,.... or
rather, as the gullible schmucks they deceived and conquered. All of the
communist political leaders have always lived in luxury and kept the best
possessions and living space for themselves. All their talk of equality and
brotherhood is a big fat lie intended to conquer and dominate unsuspect-
ing gullible schmucks. Most of the people who actively support communism
do it because they have hopes that one day they will be one of those rich
leaders who dominate the schmuck followers.
Fourth, communism must destroy the family unit. They cannot allow
a mother-father-children family unit, because this also was established by
God and is taught in correct Christianity. But mostly, once they've ruined
families and gain control of the children, then they can raise them any way
they want. (brainwashing) Just as everyone is required (by force) to share
their possessions and living space, likewise women and men and children
must all be shared equally. Marital commitment (husbands and wives)
cannot be permitted. They want people to live like dogs that roam the
streets. The destruction of marriage, up until now, has been a slow yet very
successful process. Their final goal is to eliminate marriage and family
completely. They want people to live more like dogs that roam the streets.
The removal of the authority of the husband was the first and most
important step toward the destruction of marriage and family. Permitting the

16
women to vote was a denial that husbands were the leaders and represen-
tatives of their families. Almost all modern women are not nearly as happy
as women were before women's liberation. Almost all modern women are
deceived into thinking that these changes are to their advantage. Despite
the modern high level education for women, they are not capable of under-
standing the deception of the communist feminism (women's liberation)
brainwashing (propaganda).
This is kind of like the story of a little hamster who was desperately
struggling trying to get out of her cage by opening the door. But she didn't
realize that just outside her door was a big dog staring intently at her and
licking his chops, just waiting for her to get that door open. The poor little
thing didn't know that she was much safer and happier inside the cage than
outside. This example is even more applicable to children's liberation than
it is to women's liberation.
The removal of the husbands' authority over their wives and the re-
moval of parental authority over their own children are part of the same
package. You cannot have the one without the other. The same people
who are pushing the one are pushing the other. Women who think they
somehow have an advantage by not being under a man's authority must
accept, as part of the same package, losing any normal relationship with
their own children. These changes are no more to the advantage of women
than they are to the advantage of children. The example of the little ham-
ster given above is even more applicable to children's liberation than to
women's liberation. How is it possible that most people can figure out that
both children's liberation and employee's liberation are foolish and
dangerous, but they can't figure out that women's liberation is equally as
foolish and dangerous?
To some degree parental authority has already been minimized. The
US government spends an enormous quantity of money on a gigantic agen-
cy that spends all of its time butting-in to family matters at the least little re-
port of a neighbor or an acquaintance. That agency claims to be protecting
children from abuse, but in reality, by suppressing parental authority to
make parents afraid to apply normal discipline to their own children, they
have corrupted the family environment so that chaos, craziness and/or vio-
lence multiplies. Undisciplined children get out of control. When correct
discipline is suppressed, chaos and tension escalate. This chaos in the
home makes parents feel more and more under pressure until they're like a

17
volcano ready to explode, and as a result of those explosions, cases of child
abuse go up. Also, as part of this pressure, parents live in constant fear that
the government might, at any time, take their children away. Check the
statistics, since those government people started protecting children, the
cases of violence in homes have gone up. Most parents are afraid to use
normal discipline on their own children..... and, as a result, their children are
out of control.
Many parents live in constant fear that the government may, who
knows when, remove their children from their home...... and if they ever
want to get their children back they are forced to attend certain lunatic
counseling sessions. At first glance, those lunatic government coun-
selors seem to be people who have never had children before and just
don't seem to understand what it's like to manage children. But, in reality,
when you realize that they're not interested in fixing any problems, they're
interested in ruining everything, then the lunatic counseling starts to make
sense...... and the parents won't get their children back unless they cooper-
ate with that lunacy.
As a result of these changes, family life, in the US, is much worse than
it was before this movement started. If parents would only apply correct
normal discipline with loving self-control and moderation at the beginning of
their children's misbehavior, then building up of tension, anger, screaming
and violence would not happen. Pro 23:13,14 Withhold not correction from
the child: for if thou beatest him with the rod, he shall not die. Thou shalt
beat him with the rod, and shalt deliver his soul from hell. Pro 22:15
Foolish- ness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall
drive it far from him.
Fifth, communism falsely claims to be fighting for the freedom of poor
and oppressed people. The communists call it: revolution or class
struggle. Years ago in Russia, the communists were helping the poor
oppressed people to fight for their freedom from the tyranny of the rich
Russian royalty. Supposedly, the communists were the good guys. Com-
munism was something new at that time, and most of those poor people
didn't understand what it was. But really, the communists were just using
the widespread intensive poverty that existed in those days as a tool to fool
the gullible masses of poor people into assisting them rise up and take
control of the government. At the beginning, communism put a strong
emphasis on economic equality, claiming that rich people had an obligation

18
to share their wealth with the poor people. But, in the end it was the com-
munist leaders who got all that wealth, not the masses of poor people.
Later on, especially during the 1990's, the economy all over the world
had changed. That intensive poverty is not nearly as common now, so it
has been necessary for the communists to change their battle tactics. (That
is, change their style of deception to conquer the gullible masses.) This is
why the Soviet Union was deliberately dissolved. They are now much more
a social movement than a political one. Also, by taking control of the gov-
ernment back then they had lost view of their main purpose, which was pri-
marily social, intended to corrupt religious influence and destroy families
and marriages,...... and that is done better by infiltration as influence in a
social movement in every aspect of social life. (religion, education, enter-
tainment, work environment, etc.)
Immediately after the Russian revolution, as soon as the communists
took control of the government, they were worse tyrants than the previous
Russian royalty. But, that type of tyranny doesn't exist in the US....... or
does it? Isn't the enforcement of charging enormous and unjustifiable
quantities of child support or alimony tyranny against men? Meanwhile,
most men in America go to work and at least one of their bosses is a wo-
man who earns more money than they do. The poor men who are low in-
come couldn't pay both the enormous child support and also their own
basic necessities even if they wanted to. They are forced to either become
street people...... or in order to survive they have to change their jobs, move
to a secret address and use mass transit (they are denied renewal of their
drivers license in government offices where the manager and clerk many
times are women, who earn more money than they do) and be labeled as
criminals or dead-beats.
Sometimes, those government offices even put pictures of men on a
bulletin board and are literally labeled as criminals for owing child support
in a place where the manager, many times, is a woman who earns more
money than the men who are denied renewal of their identification. Inter-
estingly, criminals such as murderers, bank robbers, extortioners, kidnap-
pers and rapists never appear on those bulletin boards. This is because the
people responsible for taking a man's child(ren) away from him and charg-
ing him with pay enormous and unjustifiable quantities of child support are
the real kidnappers and extortionists.
Or, in order to survive, those poor men who are denied their identifi-

19
cation might also consider moving to one of the oodles of English speaking
countries around the world. But they should get their passport before their
child support or alimony debt surpasses the limit of money owed in order
to get one. Canada is the closest to the US, but some Internet research
should be done about the laws in the country they want to go to, to make
sure they don't fall into the same problem they have now, all over again.
They also must check the requirements for getting permanent residence in
order to work in the country they want to go to.
And to top it all off, if any man refuses to go along with this crazy and
malicious system, those government kidnappers and thieves get the mo-
thers to poison the minds of his children by telling them that their father
abandoned them. Rest assured, this is the number one cause of the des-
truction of American marriages and families. (This thing motivates women to
fight against their husbands.)
This thing isn't just tyranny, it's the disgrace of manhood at the hands
of their own wives, legalized and falsely painted as something good by the
government, (brainwashing) in the name of protecting children from star-
vation. If a man doesn't act like a gentleman to women he is labeled a
tyrant. But, in reality, it is the women who are the tyrants. They treat men
worse than any men ever treat women. Women are rude and cruel. They
need to be dominated and trained properly not to be that way.
Why do communists claim to be freeing people from tyranny when in
reality, all they really want to do is fight against God's standards, ruin fami-
lies and conquer unsuspecting gullible people any possible way they can?
(see article on: Fatherhood) Make no mistake; the majority of US politi-
cians are communists!! Obama openly endorsed Socialist Senator Bernie
Sanders in 2006. Obama was later endorsed by the Communist Party USA
in his run for President of the United States. President Obama has openly
suggested Marxist ideologies and has surrounded himself with numerous
outspoken Marxists.

When the womens liberation movement started, some men were

against it because they thought it was abnormal. They thought it would
cause chaos and many other types of problems. They also thought of it as
a leading cause of sodomy, which is when men prefer romance with men
and women prefer romance with women. Their resistance caused the tran-

20
sitional period to be unpleasant and hostile. Today, when older people think
back and try to remember what things were like before women's liberation,
they usually mistakenly remember the unpleasantness of the transitional
period during the 60's and 70's rather than the time before it. (They must try
to remember back before 1960.)
They also remember the deceptive unrealistic propaganda saying that
any man who insisted that men should always be the leaders over women
was automatically labeled as some sort of oppressive villain. Can anyone
remember the offensive names they used to call the men who insisted on
always being the leaders of women? Those names included a false con-
notation that those men were automatically labeled as arrogant and abusive
against women, when in truth most men were loving and protective of wo-
men. (Most men in those days liked to spoil their wives.) Especially the men
who insisted on always being the leaders were loving and protective of
women; this accusation against them was false. Those deceptive offensive
names were used during the unpleasant transitional period, not before it,
nor after it..... and now forgotten.
Amazingly, one of the propaganda words that continues in use until
today is womanizer. Strangely, in the dictionary this word is defined as: to
make effeminate. The word effeminate is most commonly used for femi-
nizing men. However, in respect to women, why should it be considered
inappropriate to feminize a woman? But some people take this to the ex-
treme case, and assume it is in reference to mistreating a woman in some
way. (They never say it is mistreatment to feminize a man, it is only
mistreatment when a woman is feminized, womanized.) It is assumed
that if a woman is really treated as a woman, there must be some sort of
abuse involved. It is true that previously women used to be in inferior
circumstances just because they were women. But, so were children.
Children are still in inferior circumstances, just because they are children.
But, that does not automatically imply abusiveness. It is possible for a
person to be in an inferior situation, yet not be abused, such as em-
ployer/employee.

Female leadership over men at home and in church meetings (include-

ing classes and activities over men) is prohibited by God. Titus 2:4,5 That
they may teach the young women to be.. keepers at home, good, obe-
dient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.

21
Eph. 5:22 Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the
Lord. Church meetings: 1Tim. 2:11,12 Let the woman learn in silence
with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority
over the man, but to be in silence. 1Cor. 14:34,35 Let your women keep
silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they
are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. And if they
will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame
for women to speak in the church. Why is female leadership over men a
shame (disgrace) to men? Because God himself established that those
leadership positions are, by their very nature, MASCULINE! It is a disgrace
to manhood for men to be forced under female dominance. (divorce is better
than having a wife who dominates her husband. See article on: Correct
Divorce.)
Notice the female dominance is not forced by women, it is forced by
abnormal men who put women in positions over other men. Those men
should be castrated by the men who they forced to accept female domi-
nance, with the word CASTRATED branded on their foreheads, so that
everyone will know that they put a woman as a boss over other men. They
should also be denied adult status in society, they should not be allowed to
own property, vote, have a family or any other thing prohibited for children.
However, it is not very realistic that the men would do this kind of justice. It
is much more practical for the men to resist the same way that Gandhi re-
sisted the tyrannical British government in India. Which was also put into
practice by Martin Luther King in his fight against racial discrimination. Men
need to stand up and organize and refuse to accept this discrimination.
The men who submitted to women's liberation when it first got start-
ed were not being noble, or being gentlemen. Women's liberation is a
shame and perversion to manliness, a disadvantage to women (the same
as an employee's liberation would be a disadvantage to employees, which
would cause the worst economic disaster in the history of the world)........
and it is also blasphemy to the Word of God! (Titus 2:4,5)
In modern times, the young men who now grow up into adulthood un-
der these conditions usually have difficulty even knowing what manhood
really is. They also usually don't grow up inwardly at all. They usually
have a lack of maturity. They act like boys, not men. They are forced to
always have a mommy figure over them telling them what to do, thereby
inhibiting their normal development into manhood. When men go to work

22
and are forced to have a woman for a boss there are definite and clear ne-
gative consequences; those men never grow up.
Obviously, it can also be safely concluded that any other leadership
positions over men are, by very nature, EXTREMELY MASCULINE! (This
does not include leadership positions of women over other women or wo-
men over children.) Examples: at work (all levels and departments over
men), in adult education (universities) or in the government (All levels and
departments over men, from the position of president all the way down to
the drivers license clerk who gives men permission to drive). This is a true
definition of masculinity, by nature itself, which was established by God.....
And this used to be the normal way of life in America, before the women's
liberation movement started. (The age of adulthood is 20, not 18 nor 21.
Exo. 30:14, 38:26, Num. 14:29)

When women act masculine, by taking leadership positions over men

or refusing to accept all male authority, there is an unnatural absence of true
femininity, which causes numerous serious abnormal consequences, like
corrupt family conditions, especially abnormal physical desires. Normal
physical desires do not function normally when women act like men. Many
people can't seem to figure out if they're more attracted to the opposite
gender, their own gender, both or neither, without ever knowing why. Or, in
some cases a woman who acts like a man is attracted to a man who acts
like a woman, which is even more perverted then people being attracted to
their own gender. Now that the abnormal consequences of women's
liberation are really here, most people refuse to recognize what caused
these conditions. But, they cannot hide the fact that the modern epidemic of
these abnormal conditions started shortly after the "women's liberation"
movement began.
The present society in the US brainwashes people from childhood that
men and women should always do the same things, thereby minimizing any
distinction between masculinity and femininity. This produces a deliberately
fabricated artificial and unnatural environment. The very essence of the
nature of masculinity is that it excels to take the leadership role over femi-
ninity the same way that managers in businesses automatically take the
leadership over employees. (When women act dominant, everybody knows
that they are acting macho. Why should there be any confusion over what
the nature of masculinity is?) Management must take the leadership over

23
the workers. If it doesn't, the business won't be successful...... And there's
nothing selfish or egotistical about that, it's normal and natural.
But in modern times normal masculinity has become taboo for men,
due to this abnormal brainwashing...... And most people deny the abnormal
consequences of doing this thing are due to the real cause. After a while,
the abnormal consequences seem normal, people get used to them. Peo-
ple deny that the abnormal consequences of modern feminism are really
caused by feminism. Satan has put feminism on the agenda, so the peo-
ple follow along.
Even in nature itself, when most species mate, the male usually im-
poses himself forcibly on the female (rape). (And most of the females like it
that way.) Most species could not even reproduce (exist) without this mas-
culine attribute. Of course, among human beings this natural masculine
attribute is expected to be kept under control and practiced only in a loving
way within marriage. Marriage is one of the characteristics of human
beings that separate us from animals.
Husbands should always be in control, in a loving way, of their marital
mating activities. Amazingly, those communist people in the government
who have set out to ruin marriages have actually made a law which permits
wives to deny their husbands their marital duty and labels the husband as a
criminal rapist if he insists on his wife performing her marital duty. 1Cor.
7:3-5 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise
also the wife unto the husband. 4 The wife hath not power of her own body,
but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own
body, but the wife. 5 Defraud ye not one the other...... Those satanic peo-
ple who are deliberately intent on destroying marriages are always butting-in
where they don't belong. This type of corrupt law, and others like it, have to
be fought in the legislature. But, most Americans are too comfortable to be
bothered with doing anything about this type of corruption, yet their mar-
riages are systematically being destroyed and they can't figure out why,.....
Neither will they lift a finger to protest the true cause of the problem.

Years ago, it was always included in the wedding vows that the wife
must obey her husband. Men should automatically take the lead, in a loving
manner, with true and sincere goodness towards their wives. It is not nor-

24
mal that a man goes to work and some abnormal higher male supervisor
forces him to have a female boss. (Notice this thing of female dominance
over males at work is not forced by females. It is forced by abnormal men
under the influence of satanic communist propaganda, which was estab-
lished to destroy faithful Christian and normal customs,...... and drag as
many souls to hell as they can.)
Hereafter, if those abnormal male supervisors continue this perverted
custom they ought to be castrated by the men they have forced to accept
female bosses, and have the letters CASTRATED branded across their
foreheads so that everyone will know what they are. These men should
also be denied adult status in society; they should be treated as children
under the law, prohibited from anything for adults, like voting, owning pro-
perty and especially getting married and having children. However, it is not
very realistic that the men would do this kind of justice. It is much more
practical for the men to resist the same way that Gandhi resisted the tyran-
nical British government in India. Which was also put into practice by Martin
Luther King in his fight against racial discrimination. Men need to stand up
and organize and fight discrimination.
Besides this corruption, there are other perverted men who openly ac-
cept female bosses with great delight, as though they love to have a female
dominate them. They ought to be publicly ridiculed and punished. Taking
delight in this perverted freak behavior marks them as instigators of corrup-
tion. (This abnormal behavior must not be permitted to continue another
generation.)
The deceptive satanic communist propaganda, that has been pumped
into America for more than a hundred years, which says that, any man who
believes that men should automatically assume the leadership role over
women is always tyrannical, is no truer than to say that any parent who
automatically assumes the leadership role over their own children is always
tyrannical. Are bosses at work who automatically assume the leadership
role over their employee's always tyrannical? Certainly not!
In other countries where employers always pay very little, the workers
might think that employers are always tyrannical, but it doesn't have to be
that way. (It must also be noted that even in America, wherever there is an
abundance of employees available, such as favorite cities where an abun-
dance of immigrants like to come, there is a tendency that many employers
are abusive and tyrannical, because the employees are easily replaceable

25
in those places.)
Are teachers at school who automatically assume the leadership role
over children always tyrannical? Certainly not! But, if it does happen that
there exists a teacher who is tyrannical over students, does that mean that
the solution to the problem is to make children as the bosses over all their
teachers? Certainly not! Likewise, it is incorrect, out of place and abnormal
for women to be bosses of men.
The truth is that back in the days when it used to be automatically as-
sumed that men take the leadership role over women, most of those men
wanted to spoil their wives the same way that most parents like to spoil their
children. (Keep in mind that spoiling anyone is not good for them. Proper
good training for the improvement of character is what is best for both wives
and children.) (see article on: The Virtues of the Spirit) MOST men did not
abuse women, in those days. What kind of a sick mind would propagate or
even believe such a thing? Most men loved and protected women. It is the
communists who have the reputation for being abusers and tyrants.
Most women would love a truly masculine man, if they ever had the op-
portunity to see one. True masculinity, that automatically takes the lead in a
loving manner with true and sincere goodness, makes most women love-
sick. When women are exposed to normal men in a normal environment
they get very emotional, fickle and irrational. In extreme cases, true mascu-
linity even makes some women so love-sick that they get hysterical to the
point of being completely incapable of professional work,...... or in some
cases even incapable of any work at all. This is one of the reasons why,
many years ago, women were not given professional positions, nor were
they permitted entrance as students on equal standing with men into any of
the universities, in the US. Back then, women were also paid less than men
for doing the same type of unskilled labor. (see article on: The Role Of
Women Throughout History)
Nowadays, true masculinity for men is considered taboo...... and most
men are afraid to stand up against that taboo propaganda. Men are pro-
hibited from excelling with a healthy competitive spirit to strive to do their
best, thereby changing and lowering the normal development of the char-
acter of men. Nobody can develop leadership abilities in their own char-
acter without practice. No man can become a good leader if he gives away
that role to someone else,..... to anyone else, man or woman.
There is also a regular tendency among the men who accept women

26
as their bosses to remain childish and immature in character. The very
nature of manhood cannot progress until it overcomes the presence of a
motherly figure telling him what to do, .. especially when that motherly
figure is sweet and desirable.
Female bosses over men is an abnormal custom and causes a stifling
in the normal development of men into manhood, especially when that
motherly figure (female boss) is sweet and lovable. Nature itself dictates
that men cannot develop into manhood with a female authority figure over
them. Likewise, when a man is an adult he must also overcome the au-
thority of his own natural mother. A man will never be mature until he re-
fuses to accept his own natural mother's authority over himself. (2Chr
15:16)
Most modern men are underdeveloped and they rarely reach their
maximum potential. Men are not what they naturally would be in a normal
environment. Therefore, it is inappropriate, unreasonable and incorrect to
make any comparison of performance between men and women under such
abnormal twisted conditions. However, there still remain a few areas of life
where these differences are unmistakably impossible to cover up and falsify.
Due to the suppression of true manliness, in modern times, there are only
very few areas of life that a reasonable comparison of the performance
between men and women can be made.
In orchestral music, for example, male musicians never reach their
maximum potential when they have a woman director. Even among those
modern abnormal weirdo perverted men who delight in propagating female
bosses over men, they are not capable of producing outstanding music.
They can't do it. Please, notice that this is not a comparison of the perfor-
mance of male musicians vs. female musicians. Nor is this a comparison of
the performance of male directors vs. female directors. Nor is this a
comparison between male vs. female composers or orchestrators. (Even
though composers and orchestrators are almost always men. But that's not
the subject under discussion.) The subject under discussion is the low per-
formance of men whenever they have a female director (boss) as compared
to the unmistakably higher performance of men when they have a male
director (boss), whatever that work happens to be. (Most orchestras have
mostly male musicians with fewer female musicians.) ALL of the best or-
chestral music has been recorded using male conductors. Male musicians
with female conductors don't excel. Their CD's are never top sellers. (Ab-

27
solute 00.00%) All movie producers who want an orchestra as background
music always use male conductors.
When people hear orchestral music with a female director, without
even knowing who the director is, most people think that music sounds
second rate. Test it out! Try playing orchestral music without knowing who
the conductor is. Without knowing who is conducting, most people do not
like the music with any female conductor in comparison to the top selling
male conductors. (This is like the old Pepsi challenge, back in the 80's.
On TV commercials they showed how they gave people two little cups, one
with Pepsi and the other with Coke.... and without knowing which was
which, most people preferred Pepsi. This forced Coke to change their
recipe until they could win the challenge. As a result, now we have both
regular (new) Coke and (old) Coke Classic. They still make the original
because some people still demanded the original.)
This does not mean that all women are always bad directors. Neither
does it mean that all men are always good directors. The subject under
discussion is the low performance of men whenever they have a female
boss at work, whatever that work happens to be. (When male orchestra
directors produce bad music, it is due to them permitting the musicians to
concentrate too much on the written sheet music in front of them, which
produces a dry mechanical unfeeling robot style, that is rarely heard in other
types of music where no written music is used at all. Those orchestra direc-
tors should require the musicians to memorize the music and play it with no
written sheet music in front of them.)
Women bosses over men will never win the challenge. They can't
even change their recipe as Coke did to win the challenge. However, try
putting a woman director over an orchestra of all good female musicians.
(Which probably has never been done before.) Now, they would stand an
excellent chance of becoming top sellers and sounding very good on the
radio as well as background music in movies and could possibly win the
challenge against male directors who let the musicians concentrate too
much on the sheet music. (The musicians should have their eyes on the
director, not on the sheet music in front of them. Can you imagine what a
public orator would sound like if he was reading a speech word-for-word
from a piece of paper, as compared to speaking with a normal conversa-
tional style, while keeping his eyes on the audience?)
Human nature was designed by God. God designed men to need

28
male leaders in order to perform their best. God says: 1Cor. 11:3 .. the
head of the woman is the man.. Women bosses over men should be
considered like freaks on display in a freak show, like the Elephant Man
was..... And they should be treated like same gender romances. The male
bosses who put those women over other men should be castrated by the
men they have disgraced, and have their adult status in society denied.
(Including/especially marriage and raising children.) There must not be
another generation with this type of deformed behavior.

Nowadays, men are expected to be gentlemen and let the ladies go

first. But, in all other areas of life, everyone understands that there is a big
difference between a leader being courteous and respectful (being a gentle-
man) to subordinates, as compared to a leader giving away his leadership
position to a subordinate. It is perfectly possible for male leaders to insist
on keeping their leadership position and, at the same time, maintain gentle-
manly and courteous treatment to all of their subordinates. Maintaining all
male authority over women is not any more abusive than adults always
maintaining authority over children, or than employers always maintaining
authority over their employees, or teachers always maintaining authority
over students.
Before women's liberation, most men were not abusive to women,
despite the abundance of dishonest satanic communist propaganda which
has been pumped into the US by anti-Christian people for more than a hun-
dred years now. (On the average, it happens more often that women act
more ungentlemanly toward men than that men act that way to women. It
is the women who are the rude, discourteous ones, when they get in a po-
sition of authority.) In many movies about the era when men were always
the leaders over women, they typically misrepresent and falsify how things
used to be. Most movies are very inaccurate about history. Remember,
those movie producers are in the entertainment business. They're not in the
historical accuracy business. In addition, most movie producers follow a
communistic philosophy. They have been a big part, for many years now,
of the leadership in overthrowing the old lifestyle.
The loss of true accurate historical understanding is primarily due to
the satanic communist people who are the leaders in historical education,
who have so effectively erased any history that does not conform to the
modern standards that most people in America don't know what life was

29
like even a hundred years ago in America. Among the few people who de-
cide to start making an honest examination of true history, when they see it
for the first time, it doesn't seem real to them. The old American lifestyle
seems more like a false fantasy that has no bearing whatsoever on modern
reality. The changes are astonishing. It cannot be denied that the force
which caused these enormous changes must have been very powerful and
enduring for many years now.

Women, in modern times, are brainwashed from childhood to pursue

what was previously thought to be masculine roles in society, without even
knowing nor caring that those roles used to be considered taboo for women.
Then, when they have abnormal problems in their romance or family lives,
they can't figure out why. Even highly intelligent women can't figure out
why. (This comment is not intended to insult women. It is intended to take
note that women need loving husbands to guide them and protect them
from dangerous errors.)
Nowadays, the concept of a masculine role exclusively for men is us-
ually taboo for men. Most of those masculine roles have been forgotten;
in other words, nobody can remember the true difference between mas-
culinity and femininity. However, even though it is possible to train women
to become such things as, for example, bodybuilders and develop huge
muscles like male bodybuilders, it doesn't mean that it's something that
ought to be done. It isn't beneficial, necessary, nor is it normal. Even in
modern movies that like to propagate macho acting women, female body-
builders are not popular. The general public doesn't like looking at them.
Try to image an American professional football team made up of only
women bodybuilders with huge muscles. (Notice that outside of the US, in
every other country around the world, the word football refers to what
Americans call soccer. Soccer was invented in England, so the British call
it football and the rest of the world calls it football. Outside the US, almost
everyone calls the football that's played in America, American football.)
Try to image a new professional American football rule stating that all of
the men's professional football teams have to play against the women
bodybuilders and lose at least half the time (like they do in real life when
people are applying for any high paying professional or management jobs).
After only a few years of losing football games to the women bodybuilders,
the men would have no more reason to build up those huge muscles, and

30
most of the men would probably not even want to or care about playing
football anymore; most of them would completely lose all motivation.
After only a few more years, the new rule that ordered the men to
lose to the women bodybuilders would no longer be necessary. The men
would no longer have those big muscles, would no longer be motivated to
play their best and would LEGITIMATELY lose to the women bodybuilders.
The women bodybuilders would REALLY BE the best professional American
football players. Also, notice that the men who continue to play and seem to
enjoy losing to the women ought to be considered weirdo abnormal freaks,
just like those weirdo men who seem to enjoy having women bosses at
work or seem to enjoy having their wives dominate them.
The women fans who used to get very emotional over those big strong
men would no longer be romantically interested in them, because those
men would not be big and strong anymore, just like modern weakling men
who won't stand up against feminism. It might seem logical that the women
fans would probably be more romantically interested in the big muscular
women who look more like men than the men do. However, in real life,
those women fans normally don't like looking at big female bodybuilders and
just lose interest in both genders. Either that or it's probably more common
that those women fans would start to get romantically interested in normal-
looking non-muscular femininely shaped pretty women. Or,.... if they hap-
pen to be one of those women trained to act like a man, then they usually
get attracted to a man trained to act like a woman.
But, most importantly, the children who grow up observing this pheno-
menon would think that this is the way things always are naturally, just like
how people do now concerning education and professional jobs. Children
would grow up thinking that big muscular female professional American
football players who usually beat the men are normal. They would think
that women are naturally better than men at professional football in the
same manner that most people, nowadays, think that women are at least
equal to or better than men in academics, professional jobs and manage-
ment.
It is not any more necessary to train women in authoritative academics
than it is to train women to be huge bodybuilder football players. (author-
itative means any academics in which their diploma would give them the
right to exercise authority over men.) It isn't beneficial, necessary, nor is it
normal. It causes abnormal problems that most people can't understand

31
what's causing those problems or how to solve them. Women used to be
denied entrance into universities as students. How much less could they
have been teachers or administrators over adult male students?
Some people might say: why should a man be afraid of a little com-
petition from a woman? This isn't competition, it is forced failure. The men
are ordered to lose, not by women, but by other abnormal men above them.
When applied to marriage, it causes absolute failure and/or perversion. If
this was applied to business, it would be considered an employee's liber-
ation movement. It would cause the biggest economic disaster in the hi-
story of the world. After all, why should business management be afraid of
a little competition from employees? Why is it that people are capable of
figuring out that a little competition from employees would ruin a business,
but they can't figure out that the competition from the women's liberation
movement has already caused many big fat disasters, especially in regard
to normal romance and marriage?
Also, notice how in most (probably all) of the universities in the US, the
testing system has been deliberately designed to favor the mental charac-
teristics of women. Strange,.... most men recognize that something is weird
about those tests, but they don't really know why they're weird. None of the
women, on the other hand, notice anything at all. They have a perfect
score: absolute zero. No woman ever notices the abnormality of those
tests.
How many times is a man awarded valedictorian?........ Especially in
high school, how many male valedictorians are there in the entire United
States? In the last 50 years, probably none. In high school the grading
system is extremely biased in favor of girls. In high school it is not due to an
altered testing system, it's mostly due to personal grading favoritism by the
teachers, especially in ambiguous classes like English or Physical Educa-
tion, which are easily graded at the whims/favoritism of the teacher.
But, at universities they literally twist the testing system to favor female
mentality. At universities they want to help women pass the classes as
much as they can. They also want to make it look like women are smarter
than men. (Notice the they are probably all men. Modern feminism is not
being pushed by women; it is being pushed by satanic men.) (Keep in mind
that this type of testing system may not exist in other countries. But, it is
very popular in the US.)
But somehow even very intelligent women are not capable of figuring

32
out that it has been done artificially with a very deceptive and dangerous
purpose, to the disadvantage of women. (This comment is not intended to
insult women. It is intended to take note that women need loving husbands
to guide them and protect them from dangerous errors.) Dangerous, like
the big dog mentioned above, licking his chops, just waiting for that little
hamster to get out of her cage. How is it that even very intelligent women
can't see the big dog? This demonstrates why God ordained that women,
even highly intelligent women, need to be under the supervision and pro-
tection of men who love them. That is, normal men who are not trying to
convert women into men.
Women who were educated in universities have been trained to have
bodybuilder brains. Yet they are still incapable of understanding that this is
all to their disadvantage. Notice that the first sin in the Garden of Eden
was the pursuit of knowledge. The serpent deceived Eve by telling her
that the real reason why God prohibited the forbidden fruit was: ....that in
the day ye (yall) eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall
be as gods, knowing good and evil. Gen. 3:5 The name of the tree was:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not
eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
What is going on in modern times that passes for high level education
and professionalism for women is really very far to the extreme freakish,
perverted, weird and deformed. Modern education for women is equally as
weird, unnatural and unnecessary as an American football team of women
bodybuilders who play against the men. Any normal man ought to be turn-
ed off by it. But instead, many men try to convince themselves that they like
it this way. This is because those men know that, regardless of how ab-
normal this phenomenon is, it's on the agenda,..... and there's nothing they
can do about it. So, it's better to just accept it and learn to live with it, rather
than being miserable. The phrase on the agenda means that it has been
ordered by the big boss who almost everyone knuckles under to. Every-
body knows who's calling the shots. (Everybody except for children and a
few innocent/naive adults.)
It is, in no way, shape or form abusive to women to prohibit them from
having positions of authority over men. Furthermore, most women will be
much happier not being in those positions, even if they have to earn less
money. (provided their pay is reasonable) They will also begin to experien-
ce superior romance. Men will start acting like men again. Women will start

33
to get love-sick again over men who act like real men.

As a part of the same package of feminism, most modern professional

women have also been trained to minimize the respect for motherhood.
Especially during the unpleasant transitional period, in the 60's and 70's,
motherhood was treated as something of lesser importance. It was a com-
mon theme in movies and TV shows to have a young female character that
showed an intensive dislike to motherhood, as though it was something
repulsive. The result has been a massive unstable society in which young
people who have had insufficient motherly love frequently turn to drugs,
mental illness or purposeless suicide.
Even highly educated women can't figure out that they have been
brainwashed into thinking that if they were normal mothers, they would be
unhappy. Then, like gullible schmucks, they follow the deceptive brain-
washing and become men. (No insult intended, the purpose of this com-
ment is to motivate women to overcome the effects of the brainwashing.
The reality of the goals of those bad people who have been deceiving them
must be recognized; the big dog. How come the women can't see the big
dog?) And they can't figure out that they would have been much happier as
mothers than as being converted into men. Even now-a-days, most parents
think that if they're going to do the best for their daughters, they have to get
them to go to college. Somehow they think it would be inferior/bad for them
if they were mothers/housewives instead.
It has never been seen before, in the history of the US that most of the
large companies regularly require everyone in the company to take a drug
test, even the administrators. The divorce rate is much higher than it was
before women's liberation started. Most women are less happy in life, es-
pecially family life and romance, than they were before women's liberation.
Most people refuse to believe that women's liberation has anything to do
with these abnormal problems, but the truth is that it is cause and effect.
But, even the people who deny it is cause and effect cannot deny that the
abnormal problems started shortly after the women's liberation movement
started. The timing factor cannot be ignored/denied.
Deep down, most professional women are not as happy in life as the
non-professional women doing common labor jobs. (Provided their pay is
reasonable.) Most modern professional women would trade their jobs for a
quality relationship with a truly good man. But, despite their higher educa-

34
tion, they can't figure out that they can't have both. It is not possible to be
independent and united at the same time. Modern independent pro-
fessional couples are not really couples. They're more like independent
friends who live together,...... just roommates. Unity and independence
are opposites of each other, but despite their higher education, they can't
figure out that they can't be united and independent at the same time.
(Can you imagine living in the Independent States of America? What
would it be like? Would the states start fighting with each other like the
typical American husband and wife do?)
It is also not possible to have a good romance when both the woman
and the man are acting masculine. It is even more abnormal when the wo-
man acts masculine and the man acts feminine. The women's liberation
movement has already been a disadvantage to women equally as much as
an employee's liberation movement would be a disadvantage to employ-
ees, which would cause the worst economic disaster in the history of the
world. Normal romance has been impaired by modern feminism. Why can't
people figure out that the women's liberation movement causes problems?
People are very much capable of figuring out that an employee's liberation
movement would cause problems.

Wives are supposed to be primarily: Titus 2:5 .... keepers at home,

., which means that they should first be housewives and mothers.
Years ago, many men who married a working woman would order the wife
to stop working and be exclusively a housewife. (This was especially prac-
ticed after the US government eliminated the laws of coverture.) (See
coverture in article: The Role Of Women Throughout History.) (See article
on: Marriage Misunderstandings Explained.) However, if housewives hap-
pen to have a little extra time, there's no harm if they work part-time on the
side. (Prov. 31:10-31) The only women that should be working full-time are
women with no children. (That is, when the husband has enough income to
support the family.) Divorced mothers have no authority from God to take
the children away from their fathers. (see article on: Fatherhood) And when
the government butts-in and forces the fathers to give up the children to the
mothers, the result is always bad. And, rest assured, the mothers can't fig-
ure out why they have such a bad time of it. Sometimes, it even goes so far
that the mother gets on the phone and asks the separated father how to fix
the problems. How about that!?! She cant figure out that it was her leaving

35
her husband that caused the problem in the first place.
There are numerous other problem situations in life that women com-
monly find themselves in (such as what was mentioned above: bad family
conditions (divorce)(no normal romance), drug addiction, alcoholism due to
bad family conditions, mental illness and purposeless suicides), but some-
how women are not capable of perceiving that many of those problem situ-
ations are a direct result of the women's liberation movement. How is it
possible that people can understand that an employee's liberation move-
ment would cause a big fat disaster, but they can't understand that the wo-
men's liberation movement has already caused many big fat disasters?
God created women to feel the happiest, most secure, loved and pro-
tected when they live within God's will of all male supervision. Most pro-
fessional women who are such things as doctors, lawyers, business admi-
nistrators or politicians would be much happier in life and feel much more
fulfilled if they were mothers and housewives instead. Motherhood is the
highest value a woman can be, as a valuable asset to society. The satanic
communists want to get the mothers out of the way so that they can raise
the children any way they want. (Brainwashing, remember the hamster and
big dog mentioned above. Women can't see the big dog. They need a good
man to see it for them.)
The enormous quantity of out-of-control and emotionally unstable chil-
dren and adolescents is the consequence of most mothers putting more
importance on their high-paying careers than spending the necessary time
needed to be real mothers to their own children. By spending a lot of time
at work they have indirectly informed their own children that having a pres-
tigious macho profession and/or making lots of money is more important to
them than their own children. (It should probably be mentioned that the high
quantity of out-of-control and emotionally unstable children and adoles-
cents is much more a problem in the US, as compared to most other coun-
tries.)
This is part of the propaganda (brainwashing) that has been teaching
everyone that motherhood is kind of like the insult of being a nurse in-
stead of being a doctor or like the insult of being a secretary instead of
being a business manager. (All of that deceptive propaganda is doing a lot
of insulting.) Now-a-days there is a shortage of nurses and most people
refuse to even use the word secretary any more. They call it: adminis-
trative assistant. Yet, the work is the same as before. The work they do is

36
equally as important and necessary as it was before they changed its label.
And why did they change its label? Is it really necessary to say it? Do you
really have to be told?
Of course this is the result of all that mass of satanic communist pro-
paganda that brainwashes women to think that if they had a lowly job like a
secretary, nurse or, God forbid, the horrible state of being a housewife, they
would be some kind of insignificant nobody who is not competent enough to
do anything of real value. All that satanic communist propaganda (brain-
washing) has disrespected motherhood and taught women that if they
don't rise above womanhood and become men then they're existence is
insignificant. They are saying that motherhood is meaningless and in-
ferior! The result has been a whole generation of unstable children and
adolescents who usually end up getting into trouble or having some other
type of abnormal problem due to an insecure lack of motherly love.
The fact of the matter is that motherhood is more important than a
woman getting a prestigious high-paying professional macho job. The
supposedly intelligent women in those macho jobs are the ones who have
been deceived. They are the true losers and they can't figure out why.
Despite their higher intelligence and education, they can't figure out why
they're unhappy losers. Those macho women will also never know true
romance with a man who acts like a real man because those women have
been brainwashed to act like the man in whatever relationship they have.
Modern feminism teaches women to act like men. Modern feminism has
impaired normal romance between women and men, yet intelligent educa-
ted professional women can't figure it out. It seems real easy to understand
that a woman who acts like a man should not expect to have a normal ro-
mance with a normal man at the same time. How come they can't figure it
out?

There have never existed so many people trained in psychology and

Christian education, who are supposed to be able to solve the present
epidemic of problems of mental and emotional instability, yet these prob-
lems get worse and worse every year (due to the fact that they refuse to
acknowledge that modern feminism is the main cause of those problems).....
And those quack psychologists and Christian leaders, many times, are
having those same types of problems themselves. It doesn't take very
much understanding to see that if this trend doesn't stop progressing in the

37
direction it's going, eventually the entire social system will collapse, either
on its own, like a ship with a hole in its hull, continuously filling with water,....
or with some unexpected problem, like the Titanic's iceberg. (Which should
not have been unexpected.) What kind of a person would not notice their
own ship continually filling with water? A drunkard? What kind of a person
would go full speed at night in an ocean full of icebergs and not expect that
they might hit one? A lunatic? A mentally ill person?
Obviously, in the fields of psychology and Christian education, all
American universities and colleges are hopelessly incompetent quacks and
are hereby disqualified from giving diplomas in these fields of study. How is
it possible these people can understand that an employee's liberation
movement would cause a big fat disaster, but they can't understand that the
women's liberation movement has already caused many big fat disasters?
The modern taboo to speak against feminism has overthrown their
thinking process. It should also be noted that if the psychologists really did
start healing people from their mental and emotional illnesses, those psy-
chologists would start losing much of their income. Without a doubt, theyre
making a lot of money off the people who come to them for help. Why
should they heal them and turn away income? But, maybe that's not fair.
Satan has put feminism on the agenda..... And people are just doing what
they're told...... following Satan,...... all the way to hell.

Why do they call doctors who don't know what they're talking about
quacks? When a bunch of ducks walk together, each duck is waddling
back and forth with its head held high as though he is very important. The
self-important waddling itself is very comical. As they waddle along with
an air of self-importance, each duck tries to quack louder than all of the
other ducks so that what he says will sound more important than any of the
other ducks. But, none of the ducks are ever listening to what any of the
other ducks are saying. Each duck wants to be heard above all the others.
The quacking sound itself that the ducks make is very comical.
It would be a good idea if the people in the artificial duck call business
(like Duck Dynasty) could make a musical duck call, like a clarinet, a real
musical instrument, properly tuned so that it could produce real music with
the comical sound of an artificial duck call. Laughter, if it is applied correctly,
can have very significant healing properties; it's very therapeutic. (People in
low spirits don't heal as well as people in high spirits.) (Technically speak-

38
ing: The American Journal of Medicine has found that laughter... increas-
es secretion of catecholamines and endorphins... which in turn increases
oxygenation of the blood, relaxes the arteries... speeds up the heart, de-
creases blood pressure... which has a positive effect on all cardiovascular
and respiratory ailments... as well as overall increasing the immune system
response.) Those quack doctors would get a lot better results if they
played a musical duck call for their patients...... of course, they'll have to be
sure to play it very loud so that everyone will think they really know what
they're quacking about. They could also teach their patients how to play
quack songs, too. The song pop goes the weasel would be particularly
therapeutic.

Notice how, (exclusively in the last few decades) in movies and TV

shows, it has become popular to show women with attractive femininely
formed bodies fighting like men or doing macho activities like men, but
without those unfeminine huge bodybuilder muscles necessary to do the
job. Somehow, many people don't (like to see)/(tolerate seeing) women
with those bodybuilder muscles, yet at the same time they enjoy watching a
woman acting macho, but with a well-shaped pretty feminine body. Even
more amazing is how most men don't like to talk about it in conversation
(they don't even want to admit that it exists), but they seem to feel comfor-
table watching women acting super macho in movies; even watching a
woman beating up a man.
Years ago, movie producers knew that a sure way to get everyone to
laugh was to show a woman bossing around a man. Well, they can't use
that to make anyone laugh anymore..... And men don't even want to admit
that this disgrace exists. They don't even want to talk about it. Especially
they don't want to talk about the shameful manner that the women do it.
Yet, they seem to enjoy sitting and watching it in a movie. Amazing,.......
many men watch it, but in conversation they won't admit that they watch it,
much less admit that they enjoy watching it. It's a disgrace to manhood, but
they don't seem to care, nor understand the mental corruption it causes.
They can't get past the pleasure part.
People seem to like to watch the false fantasy of women being equally
as strong as men (or stronger) but without the unattractive huge macho
muscles necessary to do the job. This false deceptive fantasy is a conta-

39
mination to a normal human mind. (This isn't just deceptive fantasy, it's per-
verted and weird converting women into men and men into women. Why is
it so popular? Why don't people turn that junk off? Why don't people boycott
the products advertised on those shows?) It is equally as much a misrepre-
sentation of femininity as the false image they show of men always being
tyrants before women's liberation. These are irrational perversions and
everyone who wants to have a normal mind should avoid both deceptions.
Why can't people understand the crazy consequences of letting their minds
absorb that trash?
This unrealistic deceit of the true nature of femininity is a form of men-
tal illness that causes people to have real mental illness. Mental illness
doesn't just happen by itself. Something causes it to happen..... And the
US seems to be loaded with more of it than any other country. Sad to say,
many foreigners immigrate to the US seeking economic prosperity, but they
don't realize that they have to be Americanized and become mentally ill
reverse gender sex perverts in the process. (And don't forget about the
problems they will be having with their kids; problems they wouldn't be
having if they hadn't come to America.) Before they come, they don't know
that most Americans have already become mentally ill reverse gender sex
perverts. The women are being trained to act like men and the men are
being trained to act like women.
The presence of women on TV or in movies who take on any mascu-
line role confuses most people's physical desires. Many of the people who
watch that kind of stuff can't seem to decide if they're more attracted to their
own gender or the opposite gender or both or neither,.... without ever know-
ing why. In like manner, it equally confuses most people's physical desires
when women are taught in universities to have bodybuilder brains, compete
with men for high-paying professional jobs and are given positions of au-
thority over men at work or as politicians in the government. (From the posi-
tion of President all the way down to the drivers license clerk who gives men
permission to drive.) Most of the people who have abnormal physical de-
sires don't know why they have those desires.

What good is it if the human race obtains enormous advancements in

science, medicine and technology, if they cannot overcome death? Why do
so many people live as though they will never die? Why do people live as
though they will never face God's judgment after death for their rebellious

40
actions now? Matt 16:26 For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the
whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange
for his soul? Heb 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but
after this the judgment: (see article on: Salvation)
In its day, the Titanic was the latest in technological advancement.....
Yet it sank. Some of the people at that time said things like: it's the un-
sinkable ship and/or God himself could not sink this ship. BLASPHEMY!
Likewise, every society that blasphemes God with things like women's
liberation will sink. (see article on: The New World Order was Prophesied
in the Bible) Sad to say, most people won't change their bad conduct until
their Titanic hits an iceberg. It would have been a waste of time to try to get
them not to board the Titanic in the first place. Try to imagine someone
standing on the dock as the people were boarding the Titanic, warning
people not to get on. Would anybody have listened? Probably not. Sooner
or later, every blasphemous Titanic must sink!!! The writing is on the wall!
(Please read Daniel chapter 5, which is the origin of the phrase: the writing
is on the wall.)

Don't forget, that the first sin that was ever committed in human history
was a pursuit of knowledge. God had forbidden Adam and Eve to eat
from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Gen 2:17 But of the
tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day
that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. If they had not eaten of that
tree, sickness, accidents, old age and death would not exist. We would all
be living for eternity in paradise right now.
Knowledge and education are neither good nor bad in and of them-
selves. Knowledge and education can be used for good or they can also be
used for bad. God makes the rules. If someone uses knowledge and edu-
cation in a manner contrary to God's Word, then they are definitely using
knowledge and education for bad. If women are given positions of leader-
ship over men or if they are neglecting motherhood because of their edu-
cation, then that education is definitely immoral and anti-Christian. When
they do that, they are either disregarding God or saying that God is wrong.
This is blasphemy!
Notice that both Adam and Eve sinned equally, but Eve was deceived
and Adam was not. Adam ate the forbidden fruit for a different reason than
Eve did; he did it because he loved Eve more than God. 1Tim. 2:14 And

41
Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the trans-
gression. This is the primary reason why God placed the husband as the
leader of his wife. The nature of women is that they are more easily deceiv-
ed by Satan than men are. The male leadership role was intended by God
to protect women, especially from satanic deception. The women's liber-
ation movement destroys that male authority and protection.
Many years ago, there was a custom that the women were obligated to
either wear a veil over their heads or use long hair as a constant symbolic
reminder of the authority of their husbands over them and as a constant re-
minder to be submissive and obedient to their husbands. 1Cor 11:10 for
this cause ought the woman to have a sign of authority on her head.... The
husband is supposed to be both a loving leader and a protector of his wife.

There is a big difference between intelligence and education, as

compared to true wisdom. Intelligence is limited to only the few people
who have high capacity brains. It is also important to recognize that
intelligence can be used for either good or bad. There are some people
who maintain the idea that intelligence and education are, by nature
always something good.
Notice that the first sin in the Garden of Eden was the pursuit of know-
ledge. The serpent deceived Eve by telling her that the real reason why
God prohibited the forbidden fruit was: ....that in the day ye eat thereof,
then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good
and evil. Gen. 3:5 The name of the tree was: Gen 2:17 But of the tree of
the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that
thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
But, true wisdom is not limited to people with high capacity brains and
is always applied for the true best benefit of people, both in this life and in
the next life. Therefore, wisdom must also, by very nature, include a true
and clear perception of God's salvation and purpose for this life and the next
life. Proverbs 3:13-18 Happy is the man that findeth wisdom, and the
man that getteth understanding. For the merchandise of it is better than the
merchandise of silver, and the gain thereof than fine gold. She is more pre-
cious than rubies: and all the things thou canst desire are not to be compar-
ed unto her. Length of days is in her right hand; and in her left hand riches
and honor. Her ways are ways of pleasantness, and all her paths are
peace. She is a tree of life to them that lay hold upon her: and happy is

42
every one that retaineth her. Proverbs 9:10 The fear of the LORD is the
beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding.
James 1:5 If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all
men liberally, and upbraideth (rebukes) not; and it shall be given him.

A very important system used by those satanic people to propagate the

modern queer mentality of masculine acting women is the mass media (TV
and movies), which seems to be even more influential at corrupting young
people than the educational system. But, the worst satanic ringleaders of all
are the corrupt church leaders, who claim to be faithful Christians, but re-
fuse to teach and/or put into practice what the Word of God truly says.
Christianity is supposed to have the answers, but modern Christianity does
not. Most modern churches have satanic wolves in sheep's clothing for
leaders. Mat 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's
clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. (also: Act 20:29) (see
article on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing)
The Bible really does have the answers, but nobody seems to care. All
of the churches are under Satan's spell. They're unable to break away from
the corrupt twisted Bible interpretation of the satanic spy leaders. (see ar-
ticle on: Wolves In Sheep's Clothing) The few church leaders who are not
satanic spies don't seem to perceive what's going on in their own churches
and have turned lukewarm in the faith. Despite the fact that they are not
satanic spies, they are not capable of recognizing the presence or the cor-
rupt twisted Bible interpretation of the satanic spies who are among them.
Even though they are not satanic spies, they are equally as disqualified from
being church leaders as the satanic spies. (see article on: The Lukewarm
Church)

Back in the 60's, many of the people who were against the women's
liberation movement also thought that it would cause a considerable in-
crease in sodomy, along with many other abnormalities. Lev. 20:13 If a
man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have
committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood
shall be upon them. They also had a fear that God would send a horrible
punishment as a result of permitting such behavior. According to Louis
Crompton, Ph.D. on early American history, referring to this abomination

43
....... in 1776, in the original 13 colonies was universally subject to the death
penalty. However, later on, the penalty for this crime was reduced to long-
term imprisonment. As time went by, little by little, the US government de-
creased the punishment for this crime to less and less time in prison. Even-
tually, they completely repealed all the laws against it. Now, speaking
against this conduct is considered politically incorrect.
After the women's liberation movement got going, the quantity of
cases in the US of sodomy increased enormously. Rest assured, these
two things are directly related to each other >>> cause and effect. But now-
a-days, few people in the US even seem to care anything at all about whe-
ther this behavior is right or wrong. Most people do not know that when the
US first started, many of the laws regarding criminal behavior were based
on citations directly out of the Holy Bible. The US books of law themselves
had Bible quotations and references written in them. Lawyers were required
to have a very good knowledge of the Bible in order to become lawyers. At
that time, the Holy Bible was considered the primary authority on determin-
ing true morality and acceptable legal conduct.
But eventually, all of those references to the Holy Bible were removed
from the official US law books. Most of the biggest changes away from the
Holy Bible, like permitting women to vote (along with many other changes),
were made around 1920, shortly before the Great Depression and the dust
bowl. >>> Cause and effect? Certainly!!! (see article on: The Suffering Of
The Great Depression) The dust bowl, in essence was God commanding
nature itself to vomit the people out of the land because of their corruption.
Lev 18:28 That the land spue (vomit) not you out also, when ye defile it, as
it spued (vomited) out the nations that were before you. (They called the
dust storms black blizzards because they blotted out the sun so complete-
ly that it seemed like night time in the middle of the day. On Sunday April 14,
1935, the worst storm of all struck, across the entire US, which people call-
ed, Black Sunday. (see article on: The Suffering Of The Great Depres-
sion) Internet search: dust bowl images) Remember, the storms hit at the
same time as the economic crash right after the US government changed
many laws away from the Bible, >>> cause and effect? Certainly!!!
When America was young, they used to call this sin the crime against
nature, sodomy or buggery. Both the words sodomy and buggery
originally come from places or groups of people in past history who were
noted for this type of abnormal behavior. It was not referred to by the more

44
specific names in common use today. Most of the people back then were
afraid even to mention it by a specific name. They thought the name itself
was poison...... And they were right. The Bible never calls it by any of those
specific names either. (Except incorrectly in some of the modern bad trans-
lations.) Eph. 5:12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which
are done of them in secret. Eph. 5:3 But fornication, and all uncleanness,
or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh
saints;. Faithful Christians shouldn't use those words; those words are
poison.

Even in the book of the Song of Solomon, where physical affection be-
tween a husband and his wife is spoken of positively and blessed by God,
the physical intimate details are expressed by using lots of indirect symbol-
ism in order to describe the best recipe for the maximum marital physical
experience. Even though marital affection was invented by God and bles-
sed by God, it was considered inappropriate to talk about those things open-
ly and directly........ How much less the crime against nature?

It should be added here that any person who regularly commits the
crime against nature, either for real in the flesh or in the lust of the mind,
can always repent and turn to God and find complete forgiveness and sal-
vation through faith in the sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ on the cross.
(Mat. 5:27,28 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt
not commit adultery: 28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a
woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his
heart. In this passage only lusting after women is mentioned, but obviously
a man lusting after another man would equally be considered as the inten-
tions of his heart.)
God loves everyone and doesn't want anyone to perish. Rom. 1:26,27
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women
did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise
also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one
toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly (improper,
shameful), and receiving in themselves that recompence (reward) of their
error which was meet (fitting). (notice how a specific name for this sin was
never mentioned in the Bible) (also Lev. 20:13) John 3:16 For God so
loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever

45
believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. God is very
loving and forgiving, but He also insists on repentance. Mar. 1:15 The time
is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye (y'all), and believe
the gospel. Luke 15:7 .... joy shall be in heaven over one sinner that
repenteth, more than over ninety and nine just persons, which need no
repentance. KJV (also read Luke 7:36-50)
Nobody is guaranteed of tomorrow. (see article on: Salvation) In prac-
tice, the solution to overcome the problem of abnormal physical desires
such as the crime against nature is to reverse the women's liberation
movement. The women's liberation movement teaches women to act like
men, which causes an unnatural absence of true femininity, which in turn
causes abnormal physical desires.

The word sodomy or sodomite comes from the name of the city
Sodom, in the land of Israel that was known for this type of abnormal
behavior. In Gen. 18:20 - 19:28 it says that God rained fire down from
heaven and destroyed the city of Sodom and all the area around it, including
the city of Gomorrah. Abraham even refused to touch any object from
Sodom. (Gen. 14:22,23) In the same manner that people shouldn't use
specific names for that type of sin, it is also a good idea not to even touch
any object from that type of sin, as though it was contagious. The sickness
of AIDS didn't just happen by chance; it is a curse from God.

In the 1960's, many people also thought that a women's liberation

movement would cause a considerable increase in divorces (declarations of
separation) and unhappy MCTs (Modern Corrupt Twosomes, which are
corrupt marriages that shouldn't even be called marriages. See article
on: Marriage Misunderstandings Explained). Since the 1960s there has
indeed been a considerable increase in unhappy/crazy MCTs, a consider-
able increase in divorces (declarations of separation) and a considerable
increase in the crime against nature. But despite the fact that the wo-
men's liberation movement happened at the same time that these extreme
changes in the US culture started, most people in modern times refuse to
believe there is any link between them or that there is any reason why they
should even be concerned about it.
The womens liberation movement was not only blasphemy against
Gods Word, but it was also against nature itself. (Titus 2:4,5) IT IS AB-

46
NORMAL!!! It causes unhappy MCTs and it is a disadvantage to women
equally as much as an employee's liberation movement would be a dis-
advantage to employees. (Which would cause the worst economic disaster
in the history of the world.) After the womens liberation movement was in
full swing most women were less happy than before, that is, before the un-
pleasant crazy hostile transitional period. (Before 1960)
When women act like men, it does not produce happiness. God alone
has the true recipe for happiness. If you obey the Lord Jesus Christ as a
wife should obey her husband, the Spirit of God will give you deep down
true happiness, even if your outward circumstances are unpleasant. You
can also be assured that your happiness will continue into the next life as
well. Jesus said: Mat. 11:28-30 Come unto me, all ye that labour and are
heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn of
me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls.
For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

According to nature, masculinity is automatically attracted to femininity

and femininity to masculinity. But, if a society is trained (brainwashed) from
childhood to accept a false understanding of the true nature of femininity
and masculinity, then the natural attraction would be reduced. It would not
be reduced to zero, however, except in extreme cases. It also affects dif-
ferent people to different degrees. Any leadership role over men at home,
in church meetings, at work, in adult education or in all levels and depart-
ments of the government is, by very nature, EXTREMELY MASCULINE!!!
The people who prefer their own gender ordinarily don't do it because
they consider their own gender more physically attractive than the opposite
gender. They usually do it because the character of the opposite gender
does not appeal to them. However, many people in this modern environ-
ment tend to have physical desires for both genders, while a few people
have no physical desire for either gender.
Most people do not even notice the absence of femininity, which is
caused by modern feminism, which teaches women to act like men. This
feminism is the suppression of femininity for women and the suppression
of masculinity for men. When a normal man desires femininity, but can't find
it or even seem to recognize it, some of those normal men will turn to the
most likely alternatives available, without ever knowing why. The crime
against nature between men and children is caused by the unnatural ab-

47
sence of true femininity, which is caused by the feminism training of wo-
men to act like men. This is another abnormality that has risen considerably
ever since the women's liberation movement started >>> cause and effect.
The men who commit such things are usually thought of as being abnormal
and criminal. But really, most of them would probably have been normal
men if they were living in an uncorrupted society that had women who acted
feminine instead of masculine.
In the days when the crime against nature was punished by death or
imprisonment, in the US, many people thought if that type of behavior was
permitted, it would cause a horrible punishment to come upon them from
God, similar to how God rained fire down from heaven and destroyed So-
dom and Gomorrah. (Gen. 18:20 - 19:28) During the "Great Depression"
and the dust bowl in the 1930's, many people in the US thought that they
were indeed experiencing a judgment from God for the wicked conduct of
the people during the 1920's..... the roaring twenties. (see article on: The
Suffering Of The Great Depression) (Internet search: dust bowl images)
What caused the "Great Depression"? Only nine years before the
economic crash in 1929, the US government changed many of the laws
regarding how women were treated, due to the influence of an abundance
of satanic communist propaganda (brainwashing), many of those laws were
changed away from the proper teachings of the Bible. The year 1920 was
probably the biggest legal step away from the Bible and toward satanic
communism in the history of America.
It was claimed that those changes were supposed to make men and
women more equal and reduce abusiveness. But in reality, those laws were
extremely in favor of women, especially wives against husbands. The peo-
ple who made those laws were not interested in equality, they were in-
terested in the destruction of male authority and eventually the total de-
struction of the family and marriage. They wanted to completely eliminate
marriage and family altogether. So far, they have made a lot of progress.
Those laws motivate wives to fight against their husbands. Those laws
have been very effective at ruining marriages and families.
This was the first "women's liberation" movement. Some people call it
the first wave of feminism, mostly consisting in legal changes. However,
it has nothing to do with promoting femininity. It is the promotion of training
women to act like men. In reality, it is the suppression of femininity and the
perversion and disgrace of manliness. The most publicized legal change

48
was that women were given the right to vote for the first time. (See article
on: The Role of Women Throughout History)
Those legal alterations caused an immediate change in the general
mentality among most of the people. Liberal attitudes like do whatever you
want and its fun to forget about the old morals were all of the sudden
widespread. You see, it is a package deal. If people disregard one of God's
rules, then they might as well disregard all of them. They might as well go
hog-wild. They want to see if they can get God to react, even if they have to
die to see it. In Num. 16:28-41 God caused the ground itself to open up and
swallow the rebellious leaders who were against Moses, sending them alive
directly down to hell. But the next day: Num 16:41 But on the morrow all
the congregation of the children of Israel murmured against Moses and
against Aaron, saying, Ye have killed the people of the LORD. It seems as
though the previous spectacle was so amazing that the people were willing
to even spit in God's face to see if they could get Him to do it again. They
were willing to risk their own lives just to see an instant replay.
The rise of excessive greed was another big change in the same pack-
age. Many people started to gamble large amounts of money in an unstable
stock market. The love of money more than the love of God and decadent
liberal do whatever you want lifestyle replaced the old good moral stan-
dards. It was called: the roaring twenties. It was a strange era of econo-
mic prosperity, liberal morality and many unusual problems, all at the same
time. Economic prosperity is one of Satan's most effective tools at getting
people to forget about God, especially in the lukewarm church.
Immediately after the stock market crash in 1929 the dust bowl start-
ed, which was when the land itself, especially in the mid-west, refused to
produce food. It also got unusually windy, with extremely strong sand-
storms. Much of that farmland started to have sand dunes, like in a desert.
(Internet search: dust bowl images) Unusual desert sandstorms started to
happen regularly, sometimes every day, in places that had never experi-
enceed that kind of thing before. Many farmers had to leave their farmland
and look for work elsewhere. There was a shortage of food. Many thou-
sands of people starved to death. God caused nature itself to react and
reject the sinful conduct of the people..... And everyone knew it. God
caused the land itself to vomit the people out. Lev. 18:27,28 for all these
abominations have the men of the land done, that were before you, and the
land is defiled; that the land vomit not you out also, when ye defile it, as it

49
vomited out the nation that was before you. (see article on: The Suffering
Of The Great Depression)
But, since there had only been nine years of corruption, many people
still remembered the old good moral standards. Consequently, despite the
fact that the government refused to repeal the numerous corrupt anti-Chris-
tian legal changes for women, there was a massive movement to put wo-
men back into their traditional role in society and prevent women from ob-
taining positions of authority over men. The progress of the first women's
liberation movement had been almost completely stopped, despite the
efforts of the satanic communists to keep it moving. Most historians refuse
to account for the cause of this valley in the movement of feminism. They
just point out the waves of movement without mentioning any reason for
the existence of a valley. No further progress was made until the 60's.
How could this be possible? Such an extreme change in the entire
society could not have taken place without a tremendous conviction in the
conscience of almost everyone that womens liberation was wrong! They
all understood why the Great Depression came. WOMEN'S LIBERATION
IS SINFULL!!! IT IS SATANIC!!! The leaders of the satanic religion are
women; commonly known as witches. Why? Satan has chosen women
for leaders because God has chosen men for leaders. (see article on: What
About Deborah?) In Christian churches with women leaders, those women
leaders are really female wolves in sheep's clothing. (Remember Jezebel)
They are liars who love corrupting the church. The women's liberation
movement claims to promote equality, but that is not true. It may be moder-
ately equal in the work place, as far as opportunity for higher macho posi-
tions for women, but in marriage and family life it is extremely biased
against men.

After the economic crash in 1929, special safeguards on the banking

and stock market industry were established by the US government to pro-
tect the economy, so that the same economic disaster would not occur in
the future. Unfortunately, starting in the 1980's, those special safeguards for
the economy have been in the process of slow and gradual removal by the
US government. All of the modern recessions since 1980 were the result
of the removal of those special safeguards, especially the recession in
2009. (see documentary: Inside Job) This is a very important factor con-
cerning a future, and probably soon, economic disaster worse than the

50
"Great Depression".
In the 1960s, the second womens liberation movement was started
(or second wave of feminism), after most people had forgotten about the
horrible consequences of the first one. But this time, special safeguards
were used in order to counter-balance the negative effects and make it last
longer. The word counter-balance means that if someone does something
very bad, they know that God will usually let them slide-by if they do some-
thing very good to compensate for it. (Dan. 4:27)
Indirectly, the existence of those highly unusual counter-balances is a
public confession that the people who are doing them really do know the
womens liberation movement would normally provoke a horrible reaction
from God. The do whatever you want liberal thinkers are (secretly) the
most aware of the absolute necessity for those out-of-the-way unusually
good counter-balances. (The word unusual implies a comparison with
normal human conduct throughout history. Nonetheless, those unusual
counter-balances have now become usual in modern times, since the
women's liberation movement started. People are now accustomed to
them and consider them to be normal.)
In politics, the liberals are so famous for their remarkably good coun-
ter-balances, that many people think liberalism automatically includes
extraordinary goodness..... Which it doesn't. The liberals know that the
counter-balances are absolutely required to keep them from experiencing
the wrath (extreme anger) of God for their anti-Christian immoral conduct.
However, their good counter-balances only help in part. The consequen-
ces of mental illness, drug addiction, alcoholism due to unhappy family
environment, unhappy MCT's, divorces (separations), abnormal physical
desires, abnormal same gender romances and purposeless suicides as a
direct result of the women's liberation movement cannot be avoided by
doing these counter-balances. The counter-balances only serve to keep
God from taking action.

Some of the counter-balances are:

Common laborers in the US have been receiving good wages since the
1960s.
In the 90's, President Clinton himself was seen preparing a large
dinner for street people.
Many charitable organizations have received a lot of support.

51
 Racism, which used to be the law in the US, is now at a minimum.
On TV and in movies they show many ways of helping needy people or
helping social misfits that were never publicized or even thought of
before.

This is extremely extraordinarily good behavior which has never been

seen on such a large scale in the history of the world. It is very much con-
trary to the usual and common behavior of people throughout all history. Its
too good to be true. The good vs. bad balance is being over-loaded with an
enormous weight on both sides. Theres extreme corruption on one side
and extreme goodness on the other side. Will the balance itself break some
day? Will the liberals stop doing these good counter-balances some day?
What would happen if they stopped their good counter-balances?
Ever since Bush's 9-11, terrorism has been going slowly up and up......
or, many times, it's not so much terrorism itself that has been rising, but the
thought of terrorism (and war) that is constantly shown in the news, on TV
and in movies. This is psychological terrorism. Before Bush's 9-11 many
people in the US had a general mentality that somehow America was im-
mune from being attacked like that....... and the idea that the US govern-
ment itself could be responsible for such an attack, like Bush's 9-11, would
never have even been imagined at that time. (see documentary: Loose
Change) How is it possible that the US government itself could be respon-
sible for doing such a thing, like Bush's 9-11, to US citizens? Answer: ask
Bush. Maybe the US is still immune from attacks from the outside after all.
Bush's 9-11 was an attack from the inside, not an attack from the outside.
Terrorism and war are part of the curse that goes along with rebelling
against God's rules. This curse cannot be separated from women's liber-
ation. Unfortunately, extremely bad things, like terrorism and war, have to
happen before most people will turn away from the corruption of the wo-
men's liberation anti-Christian immoral way of life. The women's libera-
tion movement is a big fat Titanic that absolutely will sink! The writing is on
the wall!!! (please read Daniel chapter 5, which is the origin of the phrase:
The writing is on the wall)

When women's liberation was first getting started, many men went
along with it because they always go with the flow and they didn't like to

52
rock the boat. But, now that everyone is so accustomed to it, few people
really even give it much thought. In most cases, men have really been de-
ceived (brainwashed) into thinking that the custom of having female bosses
and politicians over men is moral, normal, noble and the gentleman-
ly thing to do. What does being a gentleman or being noble have to do
with giving away the role of leadership to a subordinate? Nothing!! It is not
moral, God says it is blasphemy!!! (Titus 2:4,5) It is not noble! It shows a
go with the flow weakness, immaturity and childishness! Why do they call
it something that it is not? It is abnormal, and a disgrace to manliness. Why
don't they face the truth of what it really is and that it is being propagated by
liars who will one day take off their deceptive masks? (Remember the ham-
ster and big dog mentioned above. Why cant women see the dog?)

When personal problems arise as the direct consequences of this re-

bellion against God, those people who go around calling this rebellion gen-
tlemanly and noble won't have the slightest clue as to what is causing
their terrible problems. God makes the rules! When people go against
God's rules, they will sooner or later have terrible problems. But especially,
they will have the problem of facing God's judgment in the next life. The
womens liberation movement causes unhappy MCTs and is a disadvan-
tage to women equally as much as an employee's liberation movement
would be a disadvantage to employees, which would indeed cause the
worst economic disaster in the history of the world.
Everyone who refuses to obey God's rules will, without a doubt, die
someday and face God's judgment. Why do so many people live as though
they will never die? (see article on: Salvation) Heb. 9:27 And as it is
appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Rev 21:7-8
He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he
shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and
murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars,
shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which
is the second death.

The real-life changes that took place during the women's liberation
movement started due to an abundance of false teaching (satanic com-
munist propaganda = brainwashing) that the position of women, in the
previous culture, being inferior to the position of the men, was labeled as

53
automatically abusive and oppressive to women. They wanted everyone to
be equal in position. But, the real abusiveness and oppression were not
really due to the differences in position, but rather the super low pay that
laborers used to make in those days. (The women usually earned less than
the men when they did the same type of unskilled work.) If they really
wanted to stop the oppression all that was necessary was to pay all the
laborers a reasonable amount of money.
The people who started this false teaching were not really concerned
about stopping oppression, they were interested in the anti-Christian over-
throw of the automatic male leadership over women. It was a movement
against true Christianity and normal human nature. The day is coming
when those wolves in sheep's clothing who started the women's libera-
tion movement are going to take off their deceptive masks and show what
their true character really is: abusive and oppressive. It has already
been abusive and oppressive against men. (see article on: Fatherhood)
The women's liberation movement is a deceptive lie and a disadvan-
tage to women. It has ruined their marriages and family life the same way
that an employee's liberation movement would be a disadvantage to em-
ployees and ruin almost every business in America. An employee's liber-
ation movement would cause an economic crash worse than the Great
Depression. Yet women can't figure out that the women's liberation move-
ment has already ruined their marriages, romance and family lives.

There is an aspect in life in which every human being should be treated

as equals; in respect of person and common courtesy. But, absolute
equality cannot be applied to the leadership position. How is it that so
many people can't seem to understand that absolute equality in position is
absurd and impossible?! In regard to leadership positions in every human
organization, including the family, all human beings are not and cannot be
equal. The positions that people hold in society could not possibly be equal.
All human organizations, including the family, must have leadership!
Even the human body itself has a head! Should the other parts of the
human body be considered abused, disrespected and oppressed be-
cause they are not the head? Certainly not! What if the entire human
body was just one great big head? How could it walk? How could it phy-
sically handle things? How could it function normally? . It couldn't! It
couldn't even feed itself.

54
 Each part of the human body was intended for a specific function.
Likewise, women and men were each created by God with a specific func-
tion in society and in family life. When people confuse those normal roles
they get problems that will never be resolved until they change it back by
giving women and men their correct roles. If there was an employee's
liberation movement which put employees as bosses in businesses, it
would cause many problems because those employees don't belong there
any more than a foot belongs on the end of an arm. A foot belongs on the
end of a leg, not arm. Regardless of the fact that the foot has to be on the
bottom, in the lowest position, that's what it was made for, and that's how it
will function best, it does not function properly as a hand.
If the type of absolute equality that is commonly applied in marriages
was applied to the work place in businesses between management and em-
ployees, almost every business in the US would collapse. It would cause
the biggest economic disaster in the history of the world. How is it possible
that the employees could be the leaders and decision makers equally as
much as the management? Most common laborers are incompetent man-
agers. The laborers do not belong as managers, likewise women do not
belong as bosses of men. Or,..... how could a business survive if all the
employees were doing whatever they wanted? How could a marriage sur-
vive if the wife was doing whatever she wanted? .. It couldn't!
Is there anyone who would suggest having two equal presidents of the
US or two equal CEO's in a company? ... How absurd!!! How is it pos-
sible that such a ludicrous departure from rational thinking could be so well
accepted concerning marriage in modern society? This type of absolute
equality would produce conflict, chaos and stalemates! Now that conflict
and chaos are a regular part of most marriages and families in America,
nobody seems to know why. How is it that people can't understand that it is
irrational for wives to expect to be equal decision makers as their husbands.
The womens liberation movement was a disadvantage to women equally
as much as an employee's liberation movement would be a disadvantage
to employees and also equally as much as a children's liberation move-
ment would be a disadvantage to children. Remember the hamster and
dog mentioned above.
The leadership position is, by nature, a superior position than the fol-
lower position. Superior positions and inferior positions are a fact of life that
cannot be avoided. Bosses at work are in a more superior position than the

55
workers' positions. But, does that imply the automatic abusiveness of
bosses to workers? . Certainly not! (In other countries where employers
always pay workers very little, the workers might think that bosses are al-
ways abusive and oppressive,..... but it doesn't need to be that way.) Par-
ents are in a more superior position than their children, but does that imply
the automatic abusiveness of parents to children? . Certainly not! Most
parents like to spoil their children. (This does not imply that spoiling children
is good for them. Children need to be taught quality character traits.)
The old custom of men always being in superior positions to women is
not automatically abusive! Quite to the contrary, most women love it when
men are strong, loving and good leaders. Most women love it when a man
is in the leadership position and treats them in a kind and courteous man-
ner. Is it more romantic for a woman to buy her own flowers or for a man to
buy flowers for her?
Before women's liberation, the real abusiveness was not concerning
the position, but rather the extremely low pay that all the laborers used to
make back in those days. The female laborers usually made even less
money than the male laborers when they did the same type of unskilled
work. (Remember, women used to get pregnant much more often back
then.) Many times the laborers were also divided into sections, that is, a
woman's section with a female supervisor and a man's section with a male
supervisor.
In modern times, laborers are paid a reasonable wage in the US, and
also in many other countries. The distinction of work positions is now no
longer a thing concerning abusive low pay, but rather, the question of whe-
ther or not someone can make an abundance of money, have a well re-
spected profession or rise to a higher social class (become snobs). In fact,
it is very common in the US, nowadays, that beginning level managers are
earning less money than the people they are supervising.
Generally speaking, who's happier in life?...... the people in high posi-
tions or the people in low positions who receive reasonable pay? Is it not
true that there are many unhappy business managers and politicians, who
make lots of money? Is it not true that there are many happy common la-
borers who receive reasonable wages? Most of the managers, business
owners and politicians are always trying to get into higher positions and
make more money. They're usually not content with what they have. They
always want more, always more, always more. Sad to say, those people

56
who think they have made it to what they thought would make them the
happiest are usually the least happy people of all. Many times they are
downright miserable. Sometimes they even express hostile resentment
towards the laborers who seem to be happier than they are.

True happiness is a gift from God. Obedience to God is what produces

real happiness, not abundance of money or social prestige (becoming
snobs). (Prov. 30:7-9) Php. 3:8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but
loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I
have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may
win Christ, Mat 16:26 For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the
whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange
for his soul? Mat 6:19-21 Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth,
where moth and rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and
steal: But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor
rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor steal: For
where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. Mat 11:28-30 Come
unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take
my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and
ye shall find rest unto your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is
light. Gal 5:22,23 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace,
longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against
such there is no law. (see article on: The Virtues of the Spirit)

The present day modern social system, especially in regard to family

and marriage, is, by its very nature, corrupt and was deliberately designed
by satanic people to ruin marriage and family life. In fact, it is so perverted
that the entire social system will probably collapse all by itself due to its own
corruption, like how the Titanic sank when it hit an iceberg. But, what form
will the iceberg take in order to bring down the witchcraft of women's liber-
ation? Maybe it will be like the trumpets for the large walls around the city
of Jericho. God had ordered the children of Israel to attack and destroy the
city of Jericho, because of its corruption. God had told them beforehand
that when they sound the trumpets, the walls would fall down all by them-
selves. Joshua 6:20 So the people shouted when the priests blew with the
trumpets: and it came to pass, when the people heard the sound of the
trumpet, and the people shouted with a great shout, that the wall fell down

57
flat, so that the people went up into the city, every man straight before him,
and they took the city.

The women's liberation movement is cursed of God. It is a big fat

Titanic!..... And rest assured, that babys going down! The writing is on the
wall!!! (Daniel 5) God will soon be making some serious changes. (see arti-
cle on: The New World Order was Prophesied in the Bible) Sad to say,
most people just won't change their sinful ways until their Titanic hits an
iceberg. Most of the people on the Titanic never made it to the lifeboats.
Jesus Christ is the eternal lifeboat for everyone who asks, both in this life
and in the next life. There is no shortage of seats on his lifeboat. Getting
on the lifeboat is how many people will turn to God! Then, many people will
obey God, love God, and accept Jesus Christ as their savior. (see article on:
Salvation)

Recommended free Bible software:

www.e-sword.net or www.theword.net

Also free Bible audio recordings at:

www.audiotreasure.com

comments for everyone to see:

https://www.tumblr.com/blog/pastordavidministries

or e-mails: pastordavidministries@openmailbox.org
PastorDavidMinistries@protonmail.com
PastorDavidMinistries@tutanota.com

OTHER ARTICLES
at: https://www.hashdoc.com
or: https://www.scribd.com look at bottom.
Sometimes hashdoc is slow, overloaded.

58
 BEST: Google Drive https://goo.gl/992nQY

The Holy Scriptures

http://docdro.id/aoytoK1

The Lie of Evolution

http://docdro.id/8iHTZPE

What About Deborah

http://docdro.id/WZFTPRT

Fatherhood
http://docdro.id/rRBGPzi

The Role Of Women Throughout History

http://docdro.id/y5N76mt

The Consequences of Using Incorrect Terminology

http://docdro.id/iSclIFT

Domestic Discipline
http://docdro.id/1p3ZWPv

The Lukewarm Church

http://docdro.id/8yBgpqf

Correct Divorce
http://docdro.id/ACf0bzC

Baptism
http://docdro.id/A5PGGa4

The Consequences of Women's Liberation

http://docdro.id/mvyN0Kw

The New World Order was Prophesied in the Bible

http://docdro.id/8PCQUwN

Self-Love and Self-Esteem

http://docdro.id/kOEGq3w

59
 Angels are Aliens, Aliens are Angels
http://docdro.id/88ttGOQ

Wolves In Sheep's Clothing

http://docdro.id/aFuq27A

Slavery
http://docdro.id/ULokluY

The Virtues of the Spirit

http://docdro.id/rAyRmTw

The Babylonian and Egyptian Captivity

http://docdro.id/iZXZXo0

The Suffering Of The Great Depression

http://docdro.id/sUSrdWV

Salvation
http://docdro.id/FwIc0hR

Marriage Misunderstandings Explained

http://docdro.id/jPdKvu5

also at:
https://www.scribd.com

https://www.scribd.com/document/356146389/The-Holy-Scriptures-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356144766/Correct-Divorce-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356144459/Angels-Are-Aliens-Aliens-Are-Angels-
August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356146540/The-Lie-of-Evolution-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356146958/The-Suffering-of-the-Great-Depression-
August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356144570/Baptism-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356145036/Domestic-Discipline-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356145143/Fatherhood-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356145494/Marriage-Misunderstandings-Explained-

60
 Aug-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356145716/Salvation-Aug-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356145838/Self-Love-and-Self-Esteem-Aug-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356145975/Slavery-Aug-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356146031/The-Babylonian-and-Egyptian-Captivity-
August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356146140/The-Consequences-of-Using-Incorrect-
Terminology-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356146266/The-Consequences-of-Women-s-
Liberation-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356143808/The-Lukewarm-Church-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356146746/The-New-World-Order-Was-Prophesied-
in-the-Bible-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356146846/the-role-of-women-throughout-history-
august-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356147021/The-Virtues-of-the-Spirit-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356147126/What-About-Deborah-August-2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/356147203/Wolves-in-Sheep-s-Clothing-August-
2017

61