Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ARTICLE XII
Patrimony
National
Economy
and
The law emphasizes that the state shall provide an equal distribution
of opportunities, wealth, and income. Is this truly achieved or at least being
strived for? No, the poorer and the harder ones job is, the less the salary he
receives. The poorer one is, the less opportunity he receives. The poor are
becoming poorer, having all the needs missed and never acquired. On the
other hand, the capitalists remain on their throne where they obtain so much
more than they need. Theirs is truly no improvement in terms of quality life
among the majority of the Filipino. Many Filipinos are hungry; they cannot
even get to go to school and enjoy their rights, especially their rights on
education.
The law also says that the State shall protect Filipino enterprises
against unfair foreign competition and trade practices. We have probably
noticed that this law is again violated and ignored because what we see now
in our nations surrounding is really evident that there are many and
dominating enterprises owned by foreigners. These foreigners-owned
businesses are weakening the Filipino businesses. The State shall have its
people prioritized.
It is really disappointing to know that the primary violators of our
constitution are our government officials.
It is obvious that the law has not been followed for a long time. we
can see businesses, institutions and other establishments which are owned
by foreigners. the law says that the State shall protect the nation's marine
wealth in its archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic
zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens.the
law emphasizes that the Filipinos shall be the number one priority and
concern of the State. it is really disappointing that the State are the initial
violator of the constitution. we can just see how awful the result of having
this law violated; our fellow Filipinos are working under these foreigner
capitalists in our very own land. if this continues, the nation's progress
would remain to be impossible. the Filipinos are being deceived; we do not
get to enjoy our own resources, instead, the foreigner capitalists are the
ones
making
use
of
all
our
resources.
For me, the State is somewhat like traitors for letting this awful thing to
happen to its people. we must not let our nation be run this way.
(From the views of Regine Galon)
period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years, and
under such terms and conditions as may be provided by law. In cases of water rights for
irrigation, water supply fisheries, or industrial uses other than the development of water
power, beneficial use may be the measure and limit of the grant."
The State shall protect the nation's marine wealth in its archipelagic waters, territorial sea,
and exclusive economic zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino
citizens.
The Congress may, by law, allow small-scale utilization of natural resources by Filipino
citizens, as well as cooperative fish farming, with priority to subsistence fishermen and fishworkers in rivers, lakes, bays, and lagoons.
The President may enter into agreements with foreign-owned corporations involving either
technical or financial assistance for large-scale exploration, development, and utilization of
minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils according to the general terms and conditions
provided by law, based on real contributions to the economic growth and general welfare of
the country. In such agreements, the State shall promote the development and use of local
scientific and technical resources.
The President shall notify the Congress of every contract entered into in accordance with
this provision, within thirty days from its execution."
Waters as we may know, in different forms, are very necessary for the
people. We use water in our daily living, calling it as a necessity. However,
issues regarding our water resources popped out giving us the idea that our
water resources are already being threatened. Such example is the Pasig
River. Pasig River has once known to be abundant with different freshwater
fishes and a wide source of livelihood of the towns people in Pasig. However,
due to tactless waste mismanagement of the people within years, Pasig
River has become a harmful place to dwell. Freshwater fishes may be
exchanged with poisonous organisms which are hazardous to human health.
BEFORE:
These pictures show the abundance and grace of Pasig River before.
AFTER:
Photos showing the destruction of Pasig River due to human careless activities.
Our lands are also being threatened. One example is the mining in
Palawan in which the government and various environmental organizations
are working to be stopped. The issue has bring out various environmental
organizations such as Save Palawan Movement, Kabang Kalikasan ng
Pilipinas (WWF-Philippines) and Tanggol Kalikasan impeding the mining
activities and protecting the biodiversiy in Palawan. The point that they
would like to stress is that Palawan is one of the provinces in the Philippines
which is very successful in terms of Tourism. It is rich of attractive places
like islands and islets, rocky coves, and sugar-white sandy beaches, to name
a few. Palawan is also the home of the famous Puerto Princesa Underground
River, Kayangan Lake and Palawan Divers. It is very disgusting to know then,
that the mining will destruct this very rich natural resource where the
livelihood of many Palawan people depends. Mining is the extraction of
valuable minerals or other geological materials from the earth. There are
different techniques in mining in which the most harmful is the mountain top
removal. This technique is done through the use of explosives and big
machines. It is a common knowledge that Palawan is also abundant with
mineral resources such as nickel, copper, manganese, and chromite.
Needless to say, the place attracts several miners, and mining, so to say, can
cause a very big problem to the biodiversity and natural ecosystem of
Palawan.
These are just few of the things that are really contradictory to the
article. We are bound to protect and to preserve the resources where the
livelihoods of our fellow Filipinos and even we, ourselves, are dependent. In
contrary, only few people grouped in a certain environmental organizations
stand up and fight for our right.
(From the views of Irene Joy B. Dayo)
This section states the proper exploration and utilization, as well as
the development and uses of the Philippine natural resources. These
resources are protected by the state from disturbance of foreign countries
that will attempt to make use of our own natural resources. Through this law
also, Filipino citizens can join the co-production and will help promote our
country's best.
Through this law, the welfare of the country's natural resources are
protected from the foreign intentions and other people who plans to have it
as their own.
The citizens of the country can also make an investment and help the
country's economy through these resources. It can be of great help for the
country and as well as for our fellow citizens. This law serves as protection
to the natural resources of the Philippines. It hinders other country to use
the country's resources and helps the citizens to have investment using its
waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of
potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and
other natural resources.
(From the views of Windel Divina Gracia and Annie Diegas)
Some of the Country's Most Protected Tourist Spots and Natural
Resources:
WhatGoodisOurNationalPatrimonyIfWeCan'tMakeMoneyOffofIt?
The national patrimony issue is the 'sleeper' in the chacha controversy. Removing
therestrictionsonforeignownershipofsectorsoftheeconomyhasnothadaconsistentadvocate
duringtheArroyoyears.Partofthereasonhasbeenthedeterminedoppositionofcivilsociety
groupsbackedbysectionsoftheCatholicchurch.Knowingthis,DeVeneciaandtheHouse
tended to shy away fromthe issue in its advocacy in 20022005. The other major chacha
proponent, the federalists organizedwithin the Citizens Movement for a Federal Philippines
(CMFP)havenotpaidmuchattentioneither.
Thepeoplewhoshouldbeinterested,thebusinesscommunity,haveonlyshownsporadic
interest.Onlyforeignchambersofcommercehaveconsistentlyadvocatedthisstep.Thedebate
onthisissuehasnotreallybeen'joined'.Itis,potentially,themostemotionallyexplosiveofthe
threemajorconstitutionalreformissueclusters.Itisnotaneasyissuetodealwith.Ononehand,
thereisnoevidencethatforeigninvestorswillrespondtochangesintheeconomicprovisionsof
the constitution. Instead, foreign investors generally point to political factors
corruption,unstableregulatoryandpolicyenvironment,peaceandorderproblemsasthemain
investmentdisincentives.Ontheotherhand,constitutionalrestrictions havenotexactlybeen
effective.Asoneanalystputit,ratherplaintively,Itwouldseemthatconstitutionalconstraints
becomeineffectivewhenthegovernmentwishesitso.
Blog Archives
Posted by Magz
Scope:
The following are owned by the State:
1. Lands of the public domain:
Waters
Minerals, coals, petroleum, and other mineral oils;
All sources of potential energy;
Fisheries;
Forests or timber;
Wildlife;
Flora and fauna; and
Other natural resources.
Alienation of Natural Resources
1. General Rule: All natural resources CANNOT be alienated
2. Exception: Agricultural lands
Exploration, Development and Utilization of Natural Resources
Filipino citizen or
Corporation or association at least 60% of whose capital is owned by such citizens
3. Limitations:
A. Period: It should not exceed 25 years, renewable for not more than 25 years
B. Under terms and conditions as may be provided by law.
4. In case of water rights/water supply/fisheries/industrial uses other than the
development of water power
The beneficial use may be the measure and limit of the grant.
Small-scale Utilization of Natural Resources
1. Congress may, by law, authorize small-scale utilization of natural resources by Filipino
citizens
2. Congress may also authorize cooperative fish farming with priority given to
subsistence fishermen and fishworkers in the rivers, lakes, bays and lagoons.
Large-Scale Exploration, Development and Utilization of Minerals/Petroleum/Other
Mineral Oils
1. The President may enter into agreements with foreign owned corporations involving
technical or financial assistance for large-scale exploration etc. of minerals, petroleum,
and other mineral oils. These agreements should be in accordance with the general
terms and conditions provided by law.
2. They should be based on the real contributions to economic growth and general
welfare of the country.
3. In the agreements, the State should promote the development and use of local
scientific and technical resources.
4. The President should notify Congress of every contract under this provision within 30
days from its execution.
5. Management and service contracts are not allowed under this rule.
Protection of Marine Wealth
1. The State shall protect its marine wealth in its
Archipelagic waters
Territorial sea &
EEZ
2. The State shall reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens.
Section 3. LANDS OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN ARE CLASSIFIED INTO
1. Agricultural
2. Forest/timber
3. Mineral lands &
4. National Parks
Note:
1. Classification of public lands is an exclusive prerogative of the Executive Department
through the Office of the President, upon recommendation by the DENR.
2. Classification is descriptive of the legal nature of the land and NOT what it looks like.
Thus, the fact that forest land is denuded does not mean it is no longer forest land.
Alienable lands of public domain
1. Only agricultural lands are alienable.
2. Agricultural lands may be further classified by law according to the uses to which
they may be devoted.
Limitations regarding Alienable Lands of the Public Domain
1. For private corporations or associations
A. They can only hold alienable lands of the public domain BY LEASE
B. Period: Cannot exceed 25 years, renewable for not more than 25 years
C. Area: Lease cannot exceed 1,000 hectares
Note: A corporation sole is treated like other private corporations for the purpose of
acquiring public lands.
2. For Filipino citizens
A. Can lease up to 500 hectares
B. Can ACQUIRE not more than 12 hectares by purchase, homestead or grant.
Taking into account the requirements of conservation, ecology and development, and
subject to the requirements of agrarian reform, Congress shall determine by law the size
of the lands of the public domain which may be acquired, developed, held or lease and
the conditions therefore.
B. Here, in possession since time immemorial, presumption is that the land was never
part of public domain.
C. In computing 30 years, start from when land was converted to alienable land, not
when it was still forest land
D. Presumption is that land belongs to the State.
Section 4. Congress shall, as soon as possible, determine by law, the specific
limits of forest lands and national parks, marking clearly their boundaries on
the ground. Thereafter, such forest lands and national parks shall be
conserved and may not be increased or diminished, EXCEPT by law. Congress
shall provide measures to prohibit logging in
1.
2.
a.
b.
General rule
1. Private lands CAN only be transferred or conveyed to:
A. Filipino citizens
B. Corporations or associations incorporated in the Philippines, at least 60% of whose
capital is owned by Filipino citizens
2. Exceptions
A. In intestate succession, where an alien heir of a Filipino is the transferee of private
land.
B. A natural born citizen of the Philippines who has lost his Philippine citizenship may
be a transferee of PRIVATE ALND, subject to limitation provided by law. Hence, land can
be used only for residential purposes. In this case, he only acquires derivative title.
C. Foreign states may acquire land but only for embassy and staff residence purposes.
3. Filipino citizenship is only required at the time the land is acquired. Thus, loss of
citizenship after acquiring the land does not deprive ownership.
4. Restriction against aliens only applies to acquisition of ownership. Therefore:
A. Aliens may be lessees or usufructuaries of private lands
B. Aliens may be mortgages of land, as long as they do not obtain possession thereof
and do not bid in the foreclosure sale.
5. Land tenure is not indispensable to the free exercise of religious profession and
worship. A religious corporation controlled by non-Filipinos cannot acquire and own
land, even for religious purposes.
Remedies to recover private lands from disqualified aliens:
1. Escheat proceedings
2. Action for reversion under the Public Land Act
3. An action by the former Filipino owner to recover the land
A. The former pari delicto principle has been abandoned
B. Alien still has the title (didnt pass it on to one who is qualified)
Power of Congress
1. Congress, upon the recommendation of NEDA, can reserve to Filipino citizens or to
corporations or associations at least 60% of whose capital is owned by such citizens, or
such higher percentage as Congress may prescribe, certain areas of investment. This
may be done when the national interest dictates.
2. Congress shall also enact measures to encourage the formation and operation of
enterprises whose capital is wholly owned by Filipinos.
Public utility
1. In order to be considered as a public utility, and thus subject to this provision, the
undertaking must involve dealing directly with the public.
2. Thus, a Build-Operate-Transfer grantee is NOT a public utility. The BOT grantee
merely constructs the utility, and it leases the same to the government. It is the
government which operates the public utility (operation separate from ownership).
To whom granted:
1. Filipino citizens or
2. Corporations or associations incorporated in the Philippines and at least 60% of the
capital is owned by Filipino citizens.
ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS
EQUITY
Exploitation of natural resources
CITIZENSHIP AND/OR
1. Filipino citizens; or
1. Filipino citizens; or
Mass Media
1. Filipino citizens; or
Advertising
1. Filipino citizens; or
Educational institution
1. Filipino citizens; or
*Congress may, by law, increase Filipino equity requirements for ALL educational
institutions.
citizens or to corporations 60% Filipino owned (or even higher) certain investment
areas.
Reference:
Political Law (Constitutional Law) Reviewer & Memory Aid
Ateneo Central Bar Operations 2001
Louie, Carrie, Evelyn, Thel, Gem, Ronald
patrimony
patrmn/
noun
1.
o