You are on page 1of 78

23 .

Mercury Exposure Levels from Amalgam
Dental fillings; Documentation of
Mechanisms by which Mercury causes over
40 Chronic Health Conditions; Results of
Replacement of Amalgam fillings; and
Occupational Effects on Dental Staff
By Bernard Windham

Mercury Exposure Levels from Amalgam Dental Fillings; Documentation of Mechanisms by Which
Mercury Causes over 40 Chronic Health Conditions; Results of Replacement of Amalgam Fillings;
and Occupational Effects on Dental Staff
Bernard Windham, Editor- Chemical Engineer 12164 Whitehouse Road
Tallahassee, FL,323 11
1. Introduction
Il. Toxicity and Health Effects of Mercury
III. Systemic Mercury Intake Levels from Amalgam Filling Exposure
IV. Immune System Effects and Autoimmune Disease
V. Medical Studies Finding Health Problems Related to Amalgam Fillings
VI. Documented Results of Removal of Amalgam Fillings
VII. Tests for Mercury Level and Toxicity and Treatments
VIII. Health Effects from Dental Staff Exposure to Mercury
IX. Scientific Panel and Government Bodies That Have Found Amalgam Fillings Unsafe
Toxic metals such as mercury, lead, cadmium, etc. have been documented to be neurotoxic,
immunotoxic, reproductive/developmental toxins that according to U.S. Government agencies cause
adverse health effects and learning disabilities to millions in the U.S. each year, especially children
and the elderly( 105,160). Exposure of humans and animals to toxic metals such as mercury, cadmium,
lead, copper, aluminum, arsenic, chromium, manganese, etc. is widespread and in many areas
increasing. . The U.S. Center for Disease Control(276) ranks toxic metals as the number one
environmental health threat to children. According to an EPA/ATSDR assessment,the toxic metals
mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium are all ranked in the top 7 toxics having the most adverse health
effects on the public based on toxicity and current exposure levels in the U.S., with nickel and
chromium also highly listed. A National Academy of Sciences report of July 2000 and other
studies(39,125) found that even small levels of mercury in fish or levels of mercury in the blood of
women below 10 micrograms per liter(ug/l) appear to result in developmental effects, and represent
unacceptable risks of birth defects and developmental effects in infants.
10 ug/l is the upper
level of mercury exposure recommended by the German Commission on Human Biomonitoring
in the blood(39).
The main factors determining whether chronic conditions are induced by metals appear to be
exposure and genetic susceptability, which determines individuals immune sensitivity and ability to
detoxify metals(405). Very low levels of exposure have been found to seriously affect relatively large
groups of individuals who are immune sensitive to toxic metals, or have an inability to detoxify metals
due to such as deficient sulfoxidation or metallothionein function or other inhibited enzymatic
processes related to detoxification or excretion of metals. For those with chronic conditions, fatigue
regardless of the underlying disease is primarily associated with hypersensitivity to inorganic and
organic mercury, nickel, and gold(369,382).
While there are large numbers of neurological and immune conditions among adults, the
incidence of neurotoxic or immune reactive conditions in infants such as autism, schizophrenia,
ADD, dyslexia, learning disabilities, etc. have been increasing especially rapidly in recent years
(2,409,441). A recent report by the National Research Council found that 50% of all pregnancies
in the U.S. are now resulting in prenatal or postnatal mortality, significant birth defects,
developmental neurological or immune conditions, or otherwise chronically unhealthy babies(441).
Exposure to toxic chemicals or environmental factors appear to be a factor in as much as 28 percent
of the 4 million children born each year-(44l), with 1 in 6 having one of the neurological conditions

previously listed. EPA estimates that over 3 million of these are related to lead or mercury
toxicity(2,125,276,409). A study at the U.S. CDC found “statistically significant associations”
between certain neurologic developmental disorders such as attention deficit disorder(ADD) and
autism with exposure to mercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines before the age of 6
While there is considerable commonality to the health effects commonly caused by these toxic
metals, and effects are cumulative and synergistic in many cases, this paper will concentrate on the
health effects of elemental mercury from amalgam fillings. Studies have found considerable genetic
variability in susceptibility to toxic metals as well. The public appears to be generally unaware that
considerable scientific evidence supports that mercury is the metal causing the most widespread
adversehealth effects to the public, and amalgam fillings have been well documented to be the number
one source of exposure of mercury to most people, with exposure levels often exceeding Government
health guidelines and levels documented to cause adverse health effects.
Toxicity and Health Effects of Mercury
Dental amalgam contains about 50 % mercury, as well as other toxic metals such as
tin,copper,nickel, palladium, etc. The average filling has 1 gram of mercury and leaks mercury vapor
continuously due to mercury’s low vapor pressure along with loss due to galvanic action of mercury
with dissimilar metals in the mouth (182,192,292,348,349,525), resulting in significant exposure for
most with amalgam fillings(see Section III). Mercury vapor is transmitted rapidly throughout the
body, easily crosses cell membranes, and like organic methyl mercury has significant toxic effects at
much lower levels of exposure than other inorganic mercury forms (38,281,287,304,329). The OSHA
level for mercury vapor in air is 50% lower than for organic mercury in air. According to the U.S.
EPA & ATSDR, mercury is among the top 3 toxic substances adversely affecting large numbers of
people(2 17), and amalgam is the number one source of exposure for most people(see III).
Mercury is the most toxic of the toxic metals. Mercury (vapor) is carried by the blood to cells
in all organs of the body where it:
(a) is cytotoxic(kills cells) (2,2 1,27,36,56,147,14&l 50,160,2 10,259,295,333/333)
(b) penetrates and damages the blood brain barrier(3 1 I), resulting in accumulation of mercury and
other toxic substances in the brain( 14,20,21b,25,85,99,175,273,301,305,/149,262,274); also
accumulates in the motor function areas of the brain and CNS(48,175,29 1,327,329).
0 is neurotoxic(kills brain and nerve cells): damages brain cells and nerve cells (19,27,34,36, 43,
69,70, 147,148,175,207,211,273,291,295,327,329,301,303,305,395/39,262,274,303); generates high
levels of reactive oxygen species(ROS) and oxidative stress, depletes glutathione and thiols causing
increased neurotoxicity from interactions of ROS, glutamate, and dopamine (13,56,98,102,126,
145,169,170, 184,2 13,2 19,250,257,259,286,290,291,302,324,326,329,424,442,496); kills or inhibits
production of brain tubulin cells (66,67,16 1,166,207,300); inhibits production of neurotransmitters
bY inhibiting: calcium-dependent neurotransmitter release(372,432), dihydroteridine reductase
(27,122,257,333), nitric oxide synthase(259), blocking neurotransmitter amino acids (4 12), and
effecting phenylalanine, serotonin, tyrosine and tryptophan transport to neurons
(34,122,126,257,285,288,333,372,374,4 12/255,333)
(d) is immunotoxic(damages and inhibits immune T-cells, B-cells, neutrophil function, etc.)
7/272) and induces ANA
antibodies and autoimmune disease (38,43,45,59,60,118,18 1,
(e) is nepthrotoxic(toxic to kidneys) (14,20,203,209~,223,254,260,268,334,438)
(f) is endocrine system-disrupting chemical(accumulates in pituitary gland and damages or inhibits

194.24.327.212.9.329.39.369.175.35).162.467/59.). causesimmune system damage resulting in allergies.5085 11.267. increased white cell count.304.8 8 8 8 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 I 8 8 8 8 8 pituitary glands hormonal functions at very low levels ( 11.35) and blocks enzymes needed to convert porphyrins to adenosine tri phosphate(ATP) causing progressive porphyrinuria.42) and significant developmental effects-much more damage to the fetus than for maternal exposure to inorganic mercury and at lower exposure levels than for organic mercury(287.35/149).285c.313.70.355.91.445. causes menstrual disturbances (9. and disrupts enzyme production processes at very low levels of exposure (9. and contractile proteins.351.39) causes cardiovascular damage and disease: including damage to vascular endothelial cells. multiple sensitivities(MCS) (8.35).234.162). lowers sperm counts and reduces motility.61 . causes infertility (4.304.162).87.132. 338.348.38. sarcolemma.342. damages DNA(296.357).338. impairs astrocyte function.2 and accumulation of heliobacter pylori. damages sperm.339.327. and fungal infections (17.509/39).39.154.511/4.. 35) .361.347.31.97.1 IO.35.). and increased risk of acute myocardial infarction (35.381).305.38. prenatal/early postnatal exposure affects level of nerve growth factor in the brain. reduces bloods ability to transport oxygen to fetus and transport of essential nutrients including amino acids.25 1.50/201.338~.181. 149. 382.161.273.2014. adrenal gland function(84.~. causes learning disabilities and impairment. imbalances in development of brain (38. tachycardia.369. reproductive and developmental toxin (2. glucose.3.276e.41. resulting in low energy.101.381.146) well as altering molecular (h) (0 6) (w (1) .230. lupus.161.chronic fatigue syndrome(CFS).296.117.404. decreased oxyhemoglobin level. a suspected major factor in stomach ulcers and stomach cancer(256) and candida albicans. zinc and Vit B 12 (43.111. 348.275.37.260) (m) inhibition of immune system facilitates increased damage by bacterial. 388.146.73. 281.339.50.etc. resulting in 09 damage to stomach lining which along with mercury’s ability to bind to SH hydroxyl radical in cell membranes alters permeability(338.69. and reduction in IQ (1. viral.38.389. thymus gland function(5 13).446/272) and neutrophil functional impairment(285.105. causes birth defects (23.350.20/4.41. thyroid gland function (50.228.38. asthma.226.43Z).90.19.17. digestive problems.13.52.and increased antibiotic resistance( 116.21c) and adversely alters bacterial populations in the intestines causing leaky gut syndrome with toxic. high blood pressure. and porphyrins in urine (34.369/274).35) and inhibits DNA & RNA synthesis (114. (4.361. inhibits cytochrome P450Areme synthesis(84.433.35.etc.392.43.306.2 as well as poor nutrient absorption. mercury causes significant destruction of stomach and intestine epithelial cells.410-412) (g) exposure to mercury vapor (or methyl mercury) causes rapid transmittal through the placenta to the fetus (20.37.339.35.367. 95.2 10. causes interruption of the cytochromeC oxidase systern/ATP energy function (43.131..4. incompletely digested complexes in the blood(222.168. causes reduced iodine uptake & hypothyroidism (50. magnesium.129. (0) forming strong bonds with and modification of the-SH groups of proteins causes mitochondrial release of calcium ( depresses enzyme isocitric dehydrogenase (ICD) in fetus. damage to sarcoplasmic reticula.61.60. 12.308.

One study found mercury levels in the pituitary gland ranged from 6. disrupting function of the pituitary gland.211.162. Low first trimester levels of free T4 and positive levels of anti-TP antibodies in the mother during pregnancy have been found to result significantly reduces lQS(509).111.405. Studies have also established a “clear association” between the presence of thyroid antibodies and spontaneous abortions(511). Based on study findings. Such hormonal secretions are affected at levels of mercury exposure much lower than the acute toxicity effects normally tested. enzyme production processes.3 to 77 ppb(85). maternal hypothyroidism appears to play a role in at least 15% of children whose IQS are more than I standard deviation below the mean. 3. including the immune system and reproductive systems.126. (50). and many hormonal functions at very low levels of exposure . Another study of pregnant women who suffer from hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid) found a four-times greater risk for miscarriage during the second trimester than those who don’t. and reduced glutathione availability (necessary for detoxification)( 13.38.54).254). while .273.35.360. 369) Thus mercury has a greater effect on the functions of these areas.19. as previously confirmed by hormonal/reproductive problems in animal populations( 104. The pituitary gland controls many of the body’s endocrine system functions and secretes hormones that control most bodily processes.338.274.459. Mercury (especially mercury vapor) rapidly crosses the blood brain barrier and is stored preferentially in the pituitary gland.194.38 1).14. and occipital cortex in direct proportion to the number and extent of dental amalgam surfaces (1.252. 8 to 10 % of untreated women were found to have thyroid imbalances so the actual level of hypothyroidism is higher commonly recognized(508). damage of thyroid RNA(458). thyroid gland. and women with untreated thyroid deficiency were four-times more likely to have a child with a developmental disabilities and lower I.20.34.Q. Women with the highest levels of thyroid-stimulating-hormone(TSH) and lowest free levels of thyroxine I7 weeks into their pregnancies were significantly more likely to have children who tested at least one standard deviation below normal on an IQ test taken at age 8. hypothalamus.99.35).25.Mercury has been well documented to be an endocrine system disrupting chemical in animals and people. inhibited glucose transfer and uptake(338.338). HgC12 inhibits aquaporin-mediated water transport in red blood cells(479).61. Mercury also damages the blood brain barrier and facilitates penetration of the brain by other toxic metals and substances(311). thyroid gland. Hypothyroidism is a well documented risk factor in spontaneous abortions and infertility(9). Levels of recurrent abortions in a population with positive levels of thyroid antibodies in one study were 40%. millions of children.287. Even larger percentages of women had elevated levels of antithyroglobulin(anti-TG) or antithyroid peroxidase antibody(anti-TP). Studies have documented that mercury causeshypothyroidism(50.366. autoimmune thyroiditis and impairment of conversion of thyroid T4 hormone to the active T3 form(369.194.85.348. 5 times the normal rate(511). 327. Hypothyroidism is also known to be a major factor in cardiovascular disease(510). According to survey tests. Studies indicate that slight imbalances of thyroid hormones in expectant mothers can cause permanent neuropsychiatric damage in the developing fetus(509.50.(p) function of amino acids and damaging enzymatic process(33. in addition to many problems caused by hormonal imbalances such as depression.91). The thyroid and hypothalamus regulate body temperature and many metabolic processes including enzymatic processes that when inhibited result in higher dental decay(35) .96. Mercury blocks thyroid hormone production by occupying iodine binding sites and inhibiting hormone action even when the measured thyroid level appears to be in proper range(35).41O-412) resulting in improper cysteine regulation( 194). Hypothyroidism is a well documented cause of mental retardation.50.50). Mercury damage thus commonly results in poor bodily temperature control. damaged sulfur oxidation processes(33.382.16.

442-444. lead.272. inhibition of DNA and RNA synthesis(4. so chronic exposure can have long term effects(5 13b).CFS. endometriosis.98.432).392/l 49). Amalgam fillings. The normalization of pituitary function also often normalizes menstrual cycle problems.84.264. ALS.355).489. and appear to be a major factor in suicide of teenagers and other vulnerable groups.329.145. Pyruvate and glycolysis problems are often seen in mercury toxic children being treated for autism(409). Mercury induced lipid peroxidation has been found to be a major factor in mercury’s neurotoxicity. suicide.cadmium.111.194.369. Low levels of pituitary function are associated with depression and suicidal thoughts. Mercury at very low concentrations has been seen to impair some lymphocytic functions causing subclinical manifestations in exposed workers.). I I I . The thymus gland plays a significant part in the establishment of the immune system and lymphatic system from the 12* week of gestation until puberty. abnormal migration of neurons in the cerebral cortex( 149). and increases fertility(35.1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 another(348) found the mean level to be 30ppb. along with replacement of metals in the mouth(Section VI.464).496). Mercury inhibits sulfur ligands in MT and in the case of intestinal cell membranes inactivates MT that normally bind cuprous ions(477). etc.96. inhibition glucose transport(338.4 1O-4 12).462.496). Also.198. thus . inhibition of glutathione peroxidase enzyme( 13. alteration of the transport of calcium(333.126). along with leading to decreased levels of glutathione peroxidation and superoxide dismustase(SOD)( 13. alteration of protein structure (33.50. MND.453. PD.272.339. disabling the necessary enzymatic processes.424. The immunological defects were consistent with altered T-cell function as evidenced by decreases in both T-cell mitogen and mixed leukocyte responses. The pituitary glands of a group of dentists had 800 times more mercury than controls(99). induction of free radical formation( 13. and immune system damage (34.254.38. micromolar levels of mercuric ions specifically blocked synthesis of ribosomal RNA. depletion of cellular glutathione(necessary for detoxification processes) (111. causing fibrillarin relocation from the nucleolus to the ncleoplasm in epitheial cells as a consequence of the blockade of ribosomal RNA synthesis. Some of the effect on depression is related to mercury’s effect of reducing the level of posterior pituitary hormone(oxytocin).197. This may explain why dentists have much higher levels of emotional problems.496).252. Oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species(ROS) have been implicated as major factors in neurological disorders including stroke.338.3 16.).4 1.etc(Section VIIl. Lymphocyte differentiation.levels found to be neurotoxic and cytotoxic in animal studies. endothelial cell damage(202). maturation and peripheral functions are affected by the thymic protein hormone thymulin.etc. MS.254.325.38.42.207b.194. nickel and gold crowns are major factors in reducing pituitary function(35. are through their replacing essential minerals such as zinc at their sites in enzymes.).263.494-496).FM. the rate-limiting enzyme for glycolysis(5 13~).9).254.226. Supplementary oxytocin extract has been found to alleviate many of these mood problems(35).254). Inhibition of thymus function can thus affect proper development of the immune and lymphatic systems.114. 4. Mercury’s biochemical damage at the cellular level include DNA damage.54.296.252/l 14). depression. Metalloprotein(MT) are involved in metals transport and detoxiflcation(442.169.56.347.I 14. and of function and other of enzyme essential nutrients(96. Part of the toxic effects of mercury. (13.43. etc. stimulate DNA synthesis of both immature and mature thymocytes at low levels of exposure.142. This appears to be a factor in deregulation of basic cellular events and in autoimmunity caused by mercury.305. Alzheimer’s.175. There were specific immunotoxic and biochemical alterations in lymphoid organs of mice treated at the lower doses of mercury. Animal studies have shown mercury significantly inhibits thymulin production at very low micromolar levels of The metal allergens mercuric chloride and nickel sulfate were found to exposure(5 13a). There was a particular association between the T-cell defects and inhibition of thymic pyruvate kinase.

410).498).132. Several clinical trials have found IGF-I treatment is effective at reducing the damage and slowing the progression of ALS and Alzheimer’s with no medically important adverse effects(498). IGF-I controls the survival of spinal motor neruons affected in ALS during development as well as later in Iife(497.468. 22% tested positive for inorganic mercury and 8% for methyl mercury . 33.498). along with mercury’s adverse effects on cellular mineral levels .35).455. Some of the processes affected by such MT control of genes include cellular respiration.369.412) as well as of xanthine oxidase(439). For example mercury has been found to strongly inhibit the activity of dipeptyl peptidase (DPP IV) which is required in the digestion of the milk protein casein(411.46. Prenatal or neonatal exposures have been found to have life long effects on nerve function and susceptability to toxic effects.412). Prenatal mercury vapor expsoure that results in levels of only 4 parts per billion in newborn rat brains was found to cause decreases in nerve growth factor and other effects(305).152. It has also been found that in chronically ill patients the levels of pituitary and thyroid hormones that control many bodily processes are low. 445. metal-specific homeostasis. for which deficiencies result in nerve degeneration. This is a level that is common in the population with several amalgam fillings or other exposures(500). eczema and psoriasis (323. having both structural and catalytic effects on gene expression( 114. Such populations have also been found to have high levels of mercury and to recover after mercury detox(413.60. IGF-I and insulin levels have been found to be reduced in ALS pateients with evidence this is a factor in ALS(497.147. and that supplenting both thyrotropinreleasing hormone and growth control hormone is more effective at increasing all of these hormone levels in the patient(499). Exposure to mercury results in changes in metalloprotein compounds that have genetic effects.330. and allergies (26.419.338~.95.3 13.156. Mercury vapor is lipid soluable Only a few micrograms of mercury and has an affinity for red blood cells and CNS ceIIs(2 1a).468).194.84.375. but males have been found more responsive to this factor than women(497).477. Another neurological effect of mercury that occurs at very low levels is inhibition of nerve growth factors.allowing buildup of copper to toxic levels in many and malfunction of the ZnKu SOD function.3 13). Studies involving a large sample of autistic and schizophrenic patients found that over 90 % of those tested had high levels of the milk protein betacasomorphin-7 in their blood and urine and defective enzymatic processes for digesting milk protein(410).296.33). and adrenal stress response systems. Of a population of over 3000 tested by the immune lymphocyte reactivity test(MELISA.160). enzymatic processes involving vitamins B6 and B 12(41 S).476. Insulin-like-growth factor I (IGF-I) are positively correlated with growth hormone levels and have been found to be the best easily measured marker for levels of growth hormone.495).442. severely disturb cellular function and inhibits nerve growth (175. effects on the cytochrome-C energy processes (43. metabolism.439.234.313.275).385. Additional cellular level enzymatic effects of mercury’s binding with proteins include blockage of sulfur oxidation processes(33.442. ScIeroderma(468).464.446.271.342. Elimination of milk products from the diet has been found to improve the condition. Significant physiological changes occur when metal ion concentrations exceed threshold levels. schizophrenia(409.464).468).331.305.60.226. lupus 3. (11) A direct mechanism involving mercury’s inhibition of cellular enzymatic processes by binding with the hydroxyl radical(SH) in amino acids appears to be a major part of the connection to allergic/immune reactive conditions such as autism(408-414.241.464.255. enzymatic processes.33 As mercury levels are reduced the protein binding is reduced and improvement in the enzymatic process occurs.330.149). Such MT formation also appears to have a relation to autoimmune reactions in significant numbers of people (114.

river miles.3 13. and most other states and 4 Canadian provinces have similar health wamings(2).104.198. and acety1cho1inesterase(35. defective sperm cells.96.105. etc.225.296. 6.85.37. Most doctors treating such conditions also usually recommend supplementing the deficient essential minerals previously noted that mercury affects.125.20. Over half the rivers and lakes in Florida have such health warnings banning or limiting eating of fish.45 1. only l/2 gram is required to contaminate a IO acre lake to the extent that a health warning would be issued by the government to not eat the fish( 15 I. noreprenephrine.4 15). aberrant chromosome numbers rather than the normal 46.8 1.9 19. the majority of the rest cannot reproduce. and increased neurological problems related to lowered levels of neurotransmitters dopamine. and lowered testosterone levels in males and menstrual disturbances and infertility in women(4.427. minks. and appear to be a major factor in suicide of teenagers and other vulnerable groups. Other studies have found similar results(5 12).. zinc.367.1 60).14 1. Similar is true of some other animals at the top of the food chain like alligators.Because of the extreme toxicity of mercury. Some of the effect on depression is related to mercury’s effect of reducing the level of posterior pituitary hormone(oxytocin).3 13.503b.119.175. asthma. polar bears. often obtaining a hair element test to determine imbalances and needs(386. chromosome breaks. A clinical study found that methyl mercury in saliva is significantly higher in those with amalgam fillings than those without.21). magnesium. testes.305.433. serotonin. depression. mercury has been found to cause additional neurological and immune system effects in many through immune/autoimmune reactions (60.3 1. Low levels of pituitary function are associated with depression and suicidal thoughts.27.290.465. and organochlorine compounds (4 13.2).of calcium.395.484).107.3 14.10. 386. and correlated with the number of amalgam fillings(506). . All Great Lakes as well as many coastal bays and estuaries and large numbers of salt water fish carry similar health warnings.412). This may explain why dentists have much higher levels of emotional problems.160). and lithium (43.254.381.273)..4 32.432. the brain is also organic (220.99.38). Most of the children tested for toxic exposures have found high or reactive levels of Much mercury in saliva and other toxic metals. Mercury accumulates in the pituitary glands. S. Wisconsin has fish consumption warnings for over 250 lakes and rivers and Minnesota even more.35. due to the estrogenic properties of mercury( 105.25. and prostrate gland( such lakes with warnings(2) and 7% of all U. Since mercury is an estrogenic chemical and reproductive toxin.38). which are affected by mercury and other hormone disrupting chemicals. beluga and orca whales. seals.288.S. Bacteria also oxidize mercury vapor to the water soluble. ionic form Hg(I1) (431).512). suicide.506.23. allergies.9.272). mercury has other documented hormonal effects including effects on the reproductive system resulting in lowered sperm counts.365.140. damaged DNA. The average male Florida panther has higher estrogen levels than females. But the effect on the immune system of exposure to various toxic substances such as toxic metals and environmental pollutants has also been found to have additive or synergistic effects and to be a factor in increasing eczema. And along with these blockages of cellular enzymatic processes.38. and sensitivity to other lesser allergens.159. In addition to having estrogenic effects. The pituitary glands of a group of dentists had 800 times more mercury than controls(99).372. I 60.etc(Section . as part of the total of over 50. since mouth bacteria and other organisms in the body methylate inorganic mercury to organic mercury(5 1. ovaries.333. Some wading birds and Florida panthers that eat birds and animals that eat fish containing very low levels of mercury(about 1 part per million) have died from chronic mercury poisoning (104.

23 1. endometriosis. Mercury in solid form is not stable.2ld). so that within 10 years up to half has been found to have been transferred to the body of the host( l&34. cadmium.336.425.28 1.192.5 grams. and since the requirement to install selenium filters mercury emission levels in crematoria have been reduced 85%(422).9). and lead have major effects on classroom behavior. and behavioral effects have been found from mercury vapor at much lower levels than for exposure to methyl mercury(287. Mercury from dental offices and human waste from people with amalgam fillings has much higher levels and is a major source of mercury in Florida waters. 162.304. The normalization of pituitary function also often normalizes menstrual cycle problems.329).1 82. 9.308.Amalgam fillings.S.525).287.369. Studies found that mercury causes or accelerates various systemic conditions in a strain dependent . and also in mental patients and criminals behavior(3. Studies have found that levels of exposure to the toxic metals mercury. 11a.50.22-24.35.336. along with replacement of metals in the mouth(Section VI. An average amalgam filling contains over % gram of mercury.348.186.360. Some genetic types are susceptible to mercury induced autoimmunity and some are resistant and thus much less affected(234.230b.526.etc.). Mercury vapor rapidly crosses the blood-brain barrier( 14. Similarly for inhibition of some essential cellular processes(333. Suplementary oxytocin extract has been found to alleviate many of these mood problems(35).304). Large numbers of animal studieshave documented that genetically susceptible strains are more affected by xenobiotic exposures than less susceptible strains (234. 101 milligrams(mg)(60% of total) or 30 micrograms per day(18).105.361) Developmental. while another Swiss study found mercury levels during cremation of a person with amalgam fillings as high as 200 micrograms per cubic meter(considerably higher than U. often exceeding site air mercury standards(420).160). and the average adult had at least 5 grams of mercury in fillings(unless most has vaporized). A study in Switzerland found that in that small country. & section III). function(35. cremation released over 65 kilograms of mercury per year as emissions.349. Running shoes with ‘/2 gram of mercury in the heels were banned by several states. according to the World Health Organization and other studies (38. A study in Sweden found significant occupational and environmental exposures at crematoria.2la.). learning ability.338. 3 11. This is in addition to air emissions. mercury standards). 10.425.7e.38.183. amounting to several hundred grams per year per office.). having low pressure and being subject to galvanic action with other metals in an oral environment(lS2. Elemental mercury vapor is more rapidly transmitted throughout the body than most other forms of mercury and has more much toxic effects on the CNS and other parts of the body than inorganic mercury due to its much greater capacity to cross cell membranes.). Studies have found that both genetic susceptibility and environmental exposures are a factor in xenobiotic related effects and disease propagation(2 1d. The amount of mercury released by a gold alloy bridge over amalgam over a 10 year period was measured to be approx.311) and placenta of pregnant women (20.287. enough to contaminate 5 ten acre lakes to the extent there would be dangerous levels in fish(151). 7.376e.).27.383.etc.85. A Japanese study estimated mercury emissions from a small crematorium there as 26 grams per day(421). 8.etc. section III). learning. nickel and gold crowns are major factors in reducing pituitary VIII. and increases fertility(35.82. because the amount of mercury was considered dangerous to public health and created a serious disposal problem. The amount of mercury in the mouth of a person with fillings was on average 2.292. Additionally cremation of those with amalgam fillings adds to air emissions and deposition onto land and lakes. One study found dental offices discharge into waste water between 65 and 842 milligrams per dentist per day(231).

I60. Those with type APOE. resulting in more inflammatory damage.with effects on memory at very low exposure .readily excrete mercury and are less susceptible.60. autoimmune antibodies also decline in animals or humans(233. Significant correlations between increasing urine mercury concentrations and prolonged motor and sensory distal Iatencies were established(285g). as early as age 40.are intermediate to the other 2 types(437. Long term occupational exposure to low levels of mercury can induce slight cognitive deficits. pain. Both immune cell type Thl and Th2 cytokine responses are involved in autoimmunity(425c).even in otherwise healthy individuals with no other risk factors for diabetes(501).285.404. and other neruological condtions(502) Another study found that many of the symptoms and signs of chronic candid&is. personality. Another genetic difference found in animals and humans is cellular retention differences for metals related to the ability to excrete mercury(426). Other studies(285c) found that mercury at levels below the current occupational safety limit causes adverse effects on mood.502. increased tremor.457.etc. Other studies(285b.342. multiple chemical sensitivity and chronic fatigue syndromes are identical to those of chronic mercurialism and remit after removal of amalgam combined with appropriate supplementation and gave evidence to implicate amalgam as the only underlying etiologic factor that is common to all(404). One genetic factor in Hg induced autoimmunity is major histocompatibility complex(MHC) linked.467).285.7 ug/ g creatinine had long lasting increases in humoral immunological stimulation of IgG. etc. and memory. inositol. Several doctors have found thiamin(B3). not excrete mercury readily and bioaccumulate mercury. polyneuropathy. lability. whereas those with type APOE.395c). Parkinson’s.). Mercury inhibits production of insulin and is a factor in diabetes and hypoglycemia. Elemental mercury can affect both motor and sensory peripheral nerve conduction and the degree of involvement is related to time-integrated urine mercury concentrations. Occupational exposure studies have found mercury impairs the body’s ability to kill Candida albicans by impairment of the Iytic activity of neutrophils and myeloperoxidase in workers whose mercury excretion levels are withing current safety Iimits(285. Thirty percent of dentists with more than average exposure were found to have neuropathies and visuogrphic dysfimction(395).7 1bd.395) found that workers exposed at high levels at least 20 years previous(urine peak levels above 600 ug/L demonstrated significantly decreased strength.234c. The incidence of autoimmune conditions have increased to the extent this is now one of the leading causes of death among women(450). including inducing of autoimmunity. and IgM levels. Higher levels have been found to cause more serious neurological problems (119.manner. fatigue. decreased coordination.35).404). IgA. decreased sensation. and that lower levels of exposure adversely affect some strains but not others. and folic acid supplementation to alleviate peripheral neuropathies. with significant reductions in insulin need after replacement of amalgam filings and normalizing of blood sugar(35). tin&us.128. Such levels of mercury exposure were also found to inhibit cellular respiratory burst. paresthesia. Also when a condition has been initiated and exposure levels decline. resulting in susceptibility to chronic autoimmune conditions such as Alzheimer’s. For example it has been found that individuals with genetic blood factor type APOE.449. A population of plant workers with average mercury excretion of 20 ug/ g creatinine was found to have long lasting impairment of neutrophil function(285. 11.g. Mercury has been found to affect both Thl and Th2 cytokines causing an increase in inflammatory TIQ In the pancreas. decreased stress tolerance. Another group of workers with average excretion rates of 24.405). Another study(59) found such impairment of neutrophils decreasesthe body’s ability to combat viruses such as those that cause heart damage. Other studies have also found a connection between mercury with peripheral neuropathy and pareshesia(I 90. Vit B6.404b). with the potential of inducing type II diabetes . damaged or destroyed by the chronic high levels of cytokines. the cells responsible for insulin production can be cytokines( 152. etc.18l.

or approx. as well as maternal linked to retardation( 1 IO) and birth mental being exposure defects(23.26. More studies found that long term exposure causes increased micronuclei in lymphocytes and significantly increased IgE levels at exposures below current safety levels(128).303. The upper level of mercury exposure recommended by the German Commission on Human Biomonitoring is 10 micrograms per liter in the blood(39). with the average after chewing being 3 times this level. The following table gives the average daily mercury exposure from saliva alone for those tested.299. Table: Average daily mercury exposure in saliva by number of amalgam tillings( 199) .. and even more so for those with more than 4 fillings.335.332. with a warning at ‘/2 ppm (125). The WHO limit for women of childbearing age at which there is a significant risk of developmental disabilities in fetal exposure is 10 ppm in hair or 40 ug/L in mother’s blood( 183) 2. The level of mercury in saliva has been found to be proportional to the number of amalgam fillings. Several were found to have mercury levels over 1100 q/L.338~/241). The U. 14 ug for the ATSDR acute oral toxicicity standard. this amounts to an exposure of 4 or 6 ug/day for the 2 elemental mercury standards.298. but adverse effects such as increases in blood pressure and cognitive effects have been documented as low as I ug/L. The older World Health Organization( 183) mercury health guideline(PTW1) is 300 ug per week total exposure or approx. The EPA drinking water standard for mercury is 2ppb( 125).199). The FDA limit for mercury in seafood is 1 ppm. The U. III. air per day.79.3 micrograms per cubic meter of sir(2). with the average exposure being above 10 micrograms per day and the average uptake over 5 @day (183. The tolerable daily exnosure level for mercury developed in a report for Health Canada is .3 1.211.S.38. Of Tubingen Health Clinic in which the level of mercury in saliva of and the MRL For the average adult breathing 20 M3 of for methyl mercury is 0.levels.6 ug Hg/L.371). Since mercury is methylized in the body. 85.182.335. Systemic Mercury Intake Level from Amalgam Fillings 1.2 ug/ M3 of air.35. 42 @day.352.361.000 tested by number of fillings.83.436. being transferred over a period of time to the host(l5amalgam fillings 19. some of both types are present in the body.50. and 10 % had unstimulated mercury saliva levels of over 100 Q/L.014 micrograms/kilogram body weight(ug/kg) or approximately 1 ug/day for average adult(2 17). (see further details continued) A large study was carried out at the Univ. The daily total exposure of mercury from fillings is from 3 to 1000 micrograms per day. and generally was higher for those with more fillings. The EPA health guideline for methyl mercury is 0.19.000 persons with amalgam fillings was measured(199).371.241. based on the average levels found per number of fillings and using daily saliva volumes of 890 ml for unstimulated saliva flow and 80 ml for stimulated flow (estimated from measurements made in the study and comparisons to other studies). Mercury in solid form is not stable due to low vapor pressure and evaporates continuously from in the mouth.100. with impacts higher in low birth weight babies(39). ATSDR health standard(MRL) for mercury vapor is 0. 1 % had unstimulated levels over 200 ug/L. causing movement out of amalgam and into the oral mucosa and saliva( 174. The level of mercury in unstimulated saliva was found to average 11.525.1 ug/kg body weight per day or 7 ug for the average adult(2).S.3 @kg body weight/day(217). EPA Health Standard for elemental mercury exposure(vapor) is 0. Mercury in the presence of other metals in the oral environment undergoes galvanic action. It also gives the 84th percentile mercury exposure from saliva for the 20. Note that 16% of all of those tested with 4 amalgam fillings had daily exposure from their amalgam fillings of over 17 ug per day.18.183.etc.

35). Three studies that looked at a population with more than 12 fillings found generally higher levels than this study. while a Norwegian study found the average level in oral air to be 0. One study that looked at this estimated a daily average burden of 20 ug from ionized mercury from amalgam fillings absorbed through the lungs( I9 I).3 19. Most of those whose intraoral air mercury levels were measured exceeded Gov’t health guidelines for workplace exposure(2).5 Saliva tests for mercury are commonly performed in Europe.133. Daily excretion . Another study at a Swedish University(335) measured intraoral air mercury levels from fiIlings of from 20 to 125 ug per day.209.5 26 30. Daily exposure from intraoral air ranged from 20 to 125 ug of mercury vapor.335.). bruxism.5 43.209.436) The sublingual venal olfactory. oral environmental factors such as acidity.4 64. Some of the factors that will be seen to influence this variability include composition of the amalgam.7 56. and many tested in past studies have exceeded the older and higher WHO guideline for mercury( 183). The main exposure paths for mercury from amalgam fillings are absorption by the lungs from intraoral air.199.6 50. and that the majority of mercury exposure was from elemental vapor. Chewing gum or drinking hot liquids can result in 10 to 100 times normal levels of mercury exposure from amalgams during that period( 15.S.211. over 40 % of those tested in the study received daily mercury exposurehigher than the WHO standard(PTWI).174. EPA and ATSDR health guideline for mercury(2.79.9 18. The authors of the Tubingen study calculated that based on the test results with estimates of mercury from food and oral air included. amalgam particles swallowed.6 61. As can be seen most people with several fillings have daily exposure exceeding the Health Canada TDE and the U. vapor absorbed by saliva or swallowed. for subjects with number of filling surfaces ranging from 18 to 82. there is considerable variability for a given number of fillings.3 46.348.etc.83.Number of fillings: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Av. etc. type of tooth paste used.319.8 24.17. The average for those with 4 or less fillings was 8 ug/L( 18). A study at Stockholm Univ. etc.7 ug/L (292c). and neural pathways are direct pathways to the brain and CNS bypassing the liver’s detox iystem and appear to represent major pathways of exposure(34) based on the high levels of mercury vapor and methyl mercury found in saliva and oral cavity of those with amalgam. and many other studies have been carried out with generally comparable results(292.8 21. Daily Hg(ug) 6.3 84th percentile(ug) 17 23.335. olfactory. Other studies found similar resuIts(83. with some with exposure levels over 1000 ug/day. whether person chews gum or drinks hot liquids. 3. with age of filling being much less significant(3 l9b). Different filling composition/manufacturer can also make a difference in exposure levels( as will be firther discussed).95). etc. While it will be seen that there is a significant correlation between exposure levels and number of amalgam surfaces and exposure generally increases as number of fillings increases. and membrane.79.182. sublingual venal.179. and neural path transfer of mercury absorbed by oral mucosa.5 35 41. It found that the majority of excretion is through feces. The Tubingen study did not assessthe significant exposure route of intraoral air and lungs.4 16.18. gums.9b. Another large German study(352) found significantly higher levels than the study summarized here.94. without consideration of exposure from food.5 I1 12.4 14 15.216..364.3 15.5 8 9.8 48. with average mercury level in unstimulated saliva of 29 ug/L( 1S). 32.352). and some individuals have been found to have intraoral air mercury levels above 400 ug/ M3 (3 19).31.77.8 ug/M3(176).222.34. and 175 ug/day(352). (6.(335) made an effort to determine the respective parts in exposure made by these paths. The studies also determined that the number of fillings is the most important factor related to mercury level.317.3 22. for persons with from 18 to 82 filling surfaces.

I ug/L.138. The same study found that the average blood level was 2.S. and also cellular membranes into major organs such as the heart since the oxidation rate of HgO though relatively fast is slower than the time required by pumped blood to reach these organs(290.348)).349. at much higher levels than inorganic mercury and also higher levels than organic mercury.02 mg/kg(528). 20 % of swallowed mercury sulfhydryl compounds are absorbed in the digestive tract. The range of mercury excreted in urine per day by those with amalgams is usually less than 15 ug(6.1 ug5.115. Nutrient transport and renal function were also found to be adversely affected by higher levels of mercury in the urine.386. and oral mucosa( 174.174. The average in those with amalgam was 4. military population(49) with an average of 19. placenta.) Most with several amalgams had daily fecal excretion levels over 50 @day. Other labs found similar results(386).436) with the half life in the brain being over 20 years.19.25.329.348).17. once in cells they form inorganic mercury that does not readily cross cell membranes or the blood brain barrier readily and is responsible for the majority of toxicity effects.335.61.274.361).83.94). 196.252). In a population of women tested In the Middle East(254).83.348.80. From the study results it was found that each 10 amalgam surfaces increased urine mercury by approx.327.5 times that of controls and more than the U. with 93% being inorganic mercury.likely originating as vapor.through feces amountedto from 30 to 190 ug of mercury. .273).199. but some patients are much higher(93). A review determined that approx. The total mercury level had a significant correlation to the number of amalgam fillings. being more variable than other paths.273. The primary detoxification/excretion pathway for mercury absorbed by the body is as mercury-glutathione compounds through the liver/bile loop to feces( 111. but some mercury is also excreted though the kidneys in urine and in sweat. and the placenta of pregnant women(38.55 ug5.20. Elemental mercury swallowed in saliva can be absorbed in the digestive tract by the blood or bound in sulfhydryl compounds and excreted through the feces.18.85). with most of the rest being converted to inorganic forms apparently. The reference average level of mercury in feces(dry weight) for those tested at Doctors Data Lab with amalgam fillings is .49.etc. with 79 % being organic mercury.85)heart(59. also bioaccumulates in the brain/CNS (301.287. compared to the reference average level for those without amalgam fillings of . 80% of swallowed methyl mercury is absorbed(335. (I 4. Significant levels are able to cross the blood brain barrier. At least 80% of particle mercury is excreted. Thus the level in the brain and heart is higher after exposure to Hg vapor than for other forms(360. kidneys(85. Approx. and the majority being mercury sulfuhydryl compounds. The feces mercury was essentially all inorganic with particles making up at most 25%. Elemental mercury vapor is transmitted throughout the body via the blood and readily enters cells and crosses the blood-brain barrier.26 mg/kg. As is known from autopsy studies for those with chronic exposure such as amalgam fillings mercury (1. This level of mercury gives a daily excretion of over 30 micrograms per day. While mercury vapor and methyl Hg readily cross cell membranes and the blood-brain barrier. A large NIDH study of the U.14. EPA maximum limit for mercury in drinking water(2 18).363).370).9 amalgam surfaces and range of 0 to 60 surfaces found the average urine level was 3.31.19.).370).36.etc.34. but approx 60% of swallowed mercury vapor is absorbed(292. (13 times that of the population w/o amalgam). The average level of those with over 49 surfaces was over 8 times that of controls.335. 85. with fillings appearing to be responsible for over 75% of total mercury.3 11.S. mean= 7 ug/L.192.15.205. while another study(363) found on average 77% of the mercury in the occipital cortex was inorganic. A study of mercury species found blood mercury was 89% organic and urine mercury was 87% inorganic(349b).)e.liver. the number of fillings was highly correlated with the mercury level in urine.16. Their study and others reviewed found that at least 80% of mercury vapor reaching the lungs is absorbed and enters the blood from which it is taken to all other parts of the body(335. Other studies had similar findings(6.3

There is in most cases chronic inflammatory response or macrophagic reaction the metals(47). or animals that died from mercury poisoning. Average mercury levels are often 1000 ppm near a gold cap on an amalgam filling due to higher currents when gold is in contact with amalgam (30.273. usually in the form of a foreign body granuloma with multinucleated giant cells of the foreign body and Langhans types( 192).138. ranging from 50 to 90 % of total exposure.48).35). Dept.17. Mercury levels in saliva and feces usually decline between 80 to 95% (79. Studies have shown that mercury in the gums such as from root caps for root canaled teeth result in chronic inflammation. but many dentists ignore the warnings. 196.16. After filling replacement levels of mercury in the blood.36. and dental materials researchers advise against having amalgam in the mouth with other metals such as gold(446.292. and fibroblasts.94.30. membranes.61. and acini of minor salivary glands. Mercury vapor from amalgam is the single largest source of svstemic mercury intake for persons with amalgam fillings.etc.29.335. have been found to play a major role in chronic heart conditions such as clogged arteries and chronic heart failure(5 IO).382. in addition to migration to other parts of the body(200. It is well documented that amalgam fillings are a major factor . elastic fibers. 4. German oral surgeons have found levels in the jaw bone under large amalgam fillings or gold crowns over amalgam as high as 5760 ppm with an average of 800 ppm(436). with levels in roots tips as high as 4 1 ppm( 192). averaging about 80% of total systemic intake. Government health agencies such as Health Canada. nerve sheaths.5 grams(500.167. Studies have shown mercury travels from amalgam into dentin. and (182.35).77-83. Peopole who tested hypothyroid usually have significantly higher levels of homocysteine and cholesterol.192. These are also known factors in developing arteriosclerotic vascular disease.89. Mercury and silver from fillings can be seen in the tissues as amalgam “tatoos”.100) Average mercury levels in gum tissue near amalgam fillings are about 200 ppm. Dark granules are also present intracellularly within macrophages.2 11. exceeding the highest levels found in chronically exposed chloralkali workers.OOOug) of mercury.47.25. imbalances.348.216. Concentrationsof mercury in oral mucosa for a population of patients with 6 or more amalgam fillings taken during oral surgery were 20 times the level of controls(l74).273. 191.274. and feces typically temporarily are increased for a few days.161.196.35.S.204).349. which have been found to accumulate in the oral mucosa as granules along collagen bundles. As much as 50% of mercury in fillings has been found to have vaporized after 5 years and 80% by 20 years(182.525. disease.303.48.I I I Thus inorganic mercury in the brain has a very long half life(85. These levels are among the highest levels ever measured in tissues of living organisms. which are documented factors in heart also had high Ievels of 50% of those testing hypothyroid.57.390.292. hyperhomocystemic or and 90% either were homocysteine(hyperhomocysteinenic) hypercholesterolemic(5 10).386) 5.19.35. multinucleated giant cells.459.303). Of Health/EPA drinking water limit for mercury which is 2 parts per billion(2 18).).82.91). blood vessels. striated muscle fibers. electrical higher and levels much mercury levels in tissues.503b.).47.g.27. dental school texts. The average amalgam filling has approximately 0.196. and the gums.-gold and mercury) causes galvanic action. vapor currents. but levels usually decline in blood and urine within 6 months to from 60 to 85% of the original levels(57. urine.183.19. These levels are much higher than the FDA/EPA action level for prohibiting use of food with over 1 ppm mercury. which are documented to be commonly caused by Thyroid mercury(369.35. and are the result of flow of mercury into the mucous membrane because of galvanic currents with the mucous membrane serving as cathode and amalgam as cathode( 192).79.332.130. Having dissimilar metals in the teeth(e. (14. endothelial cells.50. Likewise the level is tremendously over the U. root tips. those who died in Minamata. Amalgam manufacturers.25.129.

182.2 11.25.3 15. The level of mercury and copper released from high copper amalgam is as much as 50 times that of low copper amalgams( 19 1).79.89. The number of amalgam surfaces has a statistically significant correlation to : (a) blood plasma mercury level (17.19.22) related to maternal fillings. cerebellum.303.299). Studies have consistently found modem high copper non gamma-two amalgams have a high negative current and much greater release of mercury vapor than conventional silver amalgams and are more cytotoxic (35.138. they have been found to be instable in a different mechanism when subjected to wear/polishing/ chewing/ brushing: they form droplets of mercury on the surface of the amalgams( motor function areas of the brain & CNS: brain stem.77. This has also been found to be a factor in the much higher release of mercury vapor by the modem non gamma-two amalgams. The component mix in amalgams has also been found to be an important factor in mercury vapor emissions.99.222. and bone loss(29.117. and 1% had over 160 ug/day( 199).77.297). While the non gamma-two amalgams were developed to be less corrosive and less prone to marginal fractures than conventional silver amalgams. Clinics have found the increased toxicity and higher exposures to be factors in increased incidence of chronic degenerative diseases(35.83.19. bleeding.254.183.7d etc.315.79.93.254. 4% of those with fillings had daily exposurethrough saliva of over 80 ug/day. Alloys containing tin such as amalgam were found to have the highest galvanic corrosion rates.etc).186.79. the median daily exposure for those with fillings through saliva was approx.335) saliva and oral mucosa( 18.79.133. Numerous other studies also support this finding(Section IV).335).273/274) (g) brain occipital cortex (14.176. 10 ug/day. more neurotoxic than with organic tin compounds formed in the body being even mercury(5 1. Recent studies have concluded that becausethe high mercury release levels of modem amalgams.329. dorsal (i> root ganglia.2 17) (4 feces mercury (25. In a large German study.112. with the average being at least 7 micrograms per day (18. 138.262). while alloys containing copper or iron were very corrosive in acid environments(297).386) 69 (f) pituitary gland ( 3 17.179.100. and copper which also have toxic effects.442. comparable to the similar enzymatic disruptions caused by mercury and previously discussed(35.) (k) fetal and infant liver/brain levels(61 .327.273.332.199. rhombencephalon.80. 6. gingivitis.21 ab.77. A person with amalgam fillings has daily systemic intake from mercury vapor of between 3 and 70 micrograms of mercury.335) 0 oral air( 16.167. tin.).23. The methods and results of the Tubingen study( 199) were similar to those of other German studies( 09 (I) liver( 14.366/274) renal(kidney) cortex( 14.19. oral gum tissue inflamation. .21 l)(usually not as strong as other measures) @I urine mercury level (38.49. Amalgam also releasessignificant amounts of silver.85.348.3 The periodontal ligament of extracted teeth is often not fully removed and results in incomplete jawbone regrowth resulting in a pocket where mouth bacteria in anaerobic conditions along with similar conditions in the dead tooth produce extreme toxins similar to botulism which like mercury are extremely toxic and disruptive to necessarybody enzymatic processes at the cellular level.35.238).22. mercury poisoning from amalgam fillings is widespread throughout the population”( 1.85. and anterior horn motor neurons (48.117.

(20.) German studiesof mercury loss from vapor in unstimulated saliva found the saliva of those with amalgams had at least 5 times as much mercury as for controls( 138. lymph. ATSDR and EPA health guideline levels (2. Normal blood levels are less than 20 ppb.183.28.) 13.317. and nerves.93.85. brushing or polishing. The median daily exposure through saliva for those with 10 or more fillings was over 10 times that of those with no fXlings( 199.3 15). Mercury has a long half life in the body and over 20 years in the brain. those with amalgams had levels over 50 times higher than those without.35.31.89. The level of organic mercury in saliva is significantly related to the number of amalgam fillings(506). ug/kg body weight/day( 199). I 1.292.134-137. but health effects have been observed in patients in the upper part of this range.98.S.20.93) 8. Mercury also is transported along the axons of nerve fibers (5.34. Methyl mercury is 10 times more potent in causing genetic damage than any other known chemical (Ramel.38.82.17. Some mercury entering nasal passages is absorbed directly into the olfactory lobe and brain without coming from blood(34.183.273. Mercury from amalgam is methylated by bacteria. Oral bacteria streptococommus mitior.136.99.83. A Swedish study estimated the total amount mercury swallowed per day from intra-oral vapor was 10 micrograms per day( 177).4 to 28.222. The range in one study was 2.199.19. At least 30% of those having amalgam fillings tested in a large German study had ingested mercury levels exceeding the WHO PTWI mercury standard of 43 ug/day (199.319.182.etc.8 1. (34.S. EPA health guideline level(199) of 0.209.3 18).79. Thus mercury has a very long half life in the brain.( 14. in(35)).349.S.25. Teeth are living tissue and have massive communication with the rest of the body via blood. the mercury does not readily cross cell membranes or the blood-brain barrier. and the average level of exposure was 29 @day for those with at least 12 occlusal surfaces(18).mutans. Methyl mercury is more toxic to some body processes than inorganic mercury.350). and also crosses the blood-brain barrier readily. After chewing. and one study found on average that 77% of the mercury in the occipital cortex was inorganic(363).36. Once mercury vapor or methyl mercury are converted to inorganic mercury in cells or the brain. 9. galvanic electric currents(35).25.18.182. and candida albicans in the mouth and intestines(5 1.292.274. 303.16. thyroid gland(99).183).319).199.211.138. Most people with fillings have daily exposure levels exceeding the U.366) Thus mercury has a greater effect on the functions of these areas. Vapor emissionsrange up to 200 ug/M3 (35) and are much higher after chewing( 15. with many having several fillings with over 10 times that level. Mercury level in saliva has been found to give much better indication of body levels than blood or urine levels(36). The blood and urine mercury load of a person with amalgam fillings is often 5 times that of a similar person without.335.364). and using fluoride toothpaste significantly increase the intake(15. adrenal gland. and over 50% of those with 6 or more fillings had daily exposures more than the U.287.7 ppb(85).Total intake is proportional to the number and extent of amalgam surfaces.348. High levels of Vit B12 in the system also have been found to result in increased methyl mercury concentrations in the liver and brain(51).35.199. hypothalamus(348c).348. but other factors such as chewing gum.225.329). drinking hot liquids.261.35.506). 10.sanguis were all found to methylate mercury(81).3 18) The average blood level for one large population was 5 ug/l( 176). 15.80. and S. and occipital cortex in direct proportion to the number and extent of amalgam surfaces (14.183. N-acetylcysteine . and chronic low level intake results in a slow accumulation in body tissues.etc.38. 12.315. Mercury (especially mercury vapor) rapidly crosses the blood brain barrier and is stored preferentially in the pituitary gland( 14. Mercury vapor (and bacteria in teeth ) have paths to the rest of the body.3 17.327).and a large German study( 199) found median exposure through saliva alone for those with fillings to be about 10 @day.327.348.209.209). Other studies have found similar amounts( 18.503b.

Amalgam results in chronic exposure . Several authors suggest use of early mother’s milk as a screen for potential problems since it is correlated both to maternal and infant mercury levels. The milk sampled ranged from 0. and in a Norwegian group with average age 12 there was a significant correlation between urine mercury level and number of amalgam fillings( 167).22.69.186. gastrointestinal problems(2lc).22.) Mercury from amalgam in the blood of pregnant women crosses the placenta and appears in amniotic fluid and fetal blood.339. dry crusts in nose. and much higher levels in saliva after chewing. and young children is directly proportional to the number of amalgam surfaces in the mother’s mouth.112.2 to 6.23.348. A group of German children with amalgam fillings had urine mercury level 4 times that of a control group without amalgams(76). plugged ears.2IO.23 1. The highest level is in the pituitary gland of the fetus which affects development of the endocrine system. metallic taste. The level of mercury in the tissue of the fetus. spacy feeling. muscle weakness. The level of total mercury in nursing infants was significantly correlated to total mercury level in maternal hair(22.503. 14. stuffy nose. 16.386.217). Mercury is transferred mainly by binding to amino acids like albumin(339). From clinical experience some of the symptoms of mercury sensitivity/mercury poisoning include chronic fatigue. and also with the level in mother’s milk (19.304.304).45.71. frequent urination.61. and pituitary gland soon after placement (20.343. Levels for exposure to mercury vapor has been found to be approx 10 times that for maternal exposure to an equivalent dose of inorganic mercury(28 has been found to be effective at increasing glutathione levels and chelating methyl mercury(54. dizziness. liver. and many thousands who have had amalgam fillings removed(most) have had health problems and symptoms alleviated or greatly improved(see Section VI). chronic skin problems.34.6 1.or have amalgams placed or removed during pregnancy (20. new born.S. (20.20).126).508-5 IO). asthma(8. hyperventilation.528).264.304. headaches.361) The level of mercury in umbilical cord blood.279).210.287).26.504.304). immune and autoimmune diseases. ringing ears.38.28I .61.109. The U.20. guidelines(38. Immune System Effects and Autoimmune Disease 1. chest pain. Many thousands of people with symptoms of mercury toxicity have been found in tests to have high levels of mercury.366).112. and placenta was higher than that in mother’s blood (22.61 . cardiovascular problems. meconium.49.9 ug/L.38.35. IV.3 15.304. and many types of neurological problems( mcg/M3 (2.60. One study found a 60% increase in average cord blood mercury level between 1980 and 1990 in Japan(186).162. 10 times that of amalgam-free mothers.119c.294. 287. The fetal mercury content after maternal inhalation of mercury vapor was found to be higher than in the mother( There is a significant correlation between number of amalgam fillings of the mother and the level of the fetus and older infants(20. rhinitis.etc.199.97).268-270.148. 17. diabetes(35).22. chills.70. Milk increases the bioavailability of mercury( 112. chronic skin problems.l82. Fertile women should not be exposed to vapor levels above government health 304). with milk from mothers with 7 or more fillings having levels in milk approx.290. irritability. and mercury is often stored in breast milk and the fetus at much higher levels than that in the mother’s tissues (19.255. The level of mercury in maternal hair was significantly correlated to level of mercury in nursing infants(279). The level of mercury in breast milk was found to be significantly correlated with the number of amalgam fillings(61). 246.23. insomnia.3 1. ATSDR mercury health MRL of 0. 3 13.9l. and developmental behavioral effects from vapor have been found at levels considerably below that required for similar effects by methyl mercury (20.186).).36.etc. The saliva and feces of children with amalgams have approximately 10 times the level of mercury as children without(25. Dental amalgams are the main source of mercury in breast milk( 112.

Development of Th2 type immune responses deactivate such defenses(404b). Mercury caused adverse effects on both neutrophil and macrophage function and after depletion of thiol reserves.405. Mercury vapor exposure at very low levels adversely affects the immune system (17.165). Another amalgam effect found is increase in the average blood white cell count significantly (35).118. and impairs the T-4/T-8 ratio.369). and hormones.45.270.369. eczema.323.60.226. T-cells were susceptible to Hg induced cellular death (apoptosis). inflammatory bowel disease.129. causing activation of glial cells to produce superoxide and nitric oxide.129. and autoimmunity( 181. with a rapid and sustained elevation in intracellular levels of calcium induced(3 16. Thus some of the main mechanisms of toxic effects of metals include cytotoxicity. One study found that insertion of amalgam fillings or nickel dental materials causes a suppression of the number of T-lymphocytes(270). The inhibition of these tinctions by 50 % occurred rapidly at very low levels. and inactivating or inhibiting enzyme or coenzyme systems or hormones involving the sulphydrol protein (SH)groups( 18 1. MS. immunotoxicity. toxicity.3 14.405.404).404.18l.245). changes in cellular membrane permeability. NH2. binding with mitochondria. Workers occupationally exposed to mercury at levels within guidelines have been found to have impairment of lytic activity of neutrophils and reduced ability of neutrophils to kill invaders such as candida(285.272.405).296.35). HgC12 also inhibits aquaporin-mediated water transport in red blood cells(479) as well as oxygen transport by hemoglobin(232). coenzymes.rather than acute exposure and accumulation in body organs over time.43). anemia.3 14.84. allergic diseases such as eczema and lupus (234. All types of cells exhibited a dose dependent reduction in cellular glutathione when exposed to mercury.333). Mercury also inhibited B-cell and T-cell RNA and DNA synthesis. Mercury induced autoimmunity in animals and humans has been found to be associated with mercury’s expression of major histocompatibility complex(MHC) class II genes(314. (3 16) B-cell expression of IgE receptors were significantly reduced(3 16.27. Low doses also induced autoimmuntiy in some species( 18 1.314. but serious health problems have been documented to be related to amalgam and researchershave attributed some deaths as due to amalgam (356.355342. inhibiting ability to secrete interleukin IL-1 and IL-2R. inhibiting generation of GSH by lymphocytes and monocytes(252).424. . and immune reactivity or autoimmunity. and generationof lipid peroxides or free radicals.425c).442).313.131. 2.32. impairing cellular respiration and cellular energy. Mercury inhibits macrophage and neutrophil defense against candida by its affects on Thl and Th2 cytokine effects( 18 1. and Cl groups in proteins. gastrointestinal/metabolic effects.(226. impaired cellular respiration. in the range of 10 to 25 ug/L. and depressive symptoms(460). Candida overgrowth results in production of the highly toxic canditoxin and ethanol which are known to cause fatigue. From animal studies it has been determined that mercury damages T-cells by generating reactive oxygen species(ROS).355) Interferon syntheses was reduced in a concentration dependent manner with either mercury or methyl mercury as well as other immune functions(l31).338. causing destruction of cytoplasmic organelles with loss of cell membrane integrity. Both mercuric and methyl mercury chlorides caused dose dependent reduction in immune B-cell production. and glomerulonephritis.31. so most health effects are of the chronic rather than acute in nature.285).which result in neurotoxicity. depleting the thiol reserves of cells. Both forms are immontoxic and cytotoxic ant very low levels seen in individuals. and low doses also induce aggregation of cell surface proteins and dramatic tyrosine phosporlation of cellular proteins related to asthma. inhibition of enzymes. hormonal effects. along with OH. Immune Thl cells inhibit candida by cytokine related activation of macrophages and neutrophils.285. Low T4/T8 ratio has been found to be a factor in lupus. damaging and decreasing the dimension of mitochondria.

and increased free radicals-all factors in increased susceptibility to cancer(l4. Alzheimer’s.35. it was found many cases can only be effectively treated by antibiotics after removal of body mercury burden(cilantro tablets were used with followup antibiotics)(25 1. 4.25 1.494.469.180).52 I).40.180.495). as well as supplementation with antioxidants and nitric oxide-suppressing agents and peroxynitrite scavengers such as Vit C. 5. disabling early control of viruses and leading to enhanced infection(l31.43.496. depressesrates of methylation.403).237. Animal studies have confirmed that mercury increases effects of the herpes simplex vet-is type 2 for example( 13 I). Parkinson’s.34.283). Mercury by its effect of weakening the immune system contributes to increased chronic diseases and cancer(91. which in turn leads to increased levels of superoxide due to toxic metal exposure.144.355. and is often a factor in neurodegeneration(489). Mercury from amalgam interferes with production of cytokines that activate macrophage and neutrophils. and non-familial ALS(489. Similar results have been found for treatment of cancer(35).464. peroxynitrite.143.222. Amalgam fillings have also been found to be positively associated with mouth cancer(206. gingko biloba.427.38. This is in addition to mercury’s effect on metallothionein and copper homeostasis as previously discussed(477).43.1 I 1). Both mercuric and methyl mercury were equally highly toxic at the cellular level and in causing cell volume reductions( 13 1). 3.237.etc. 87% showed LST positive reactions to Hg.25 1).239. camosine. Coenzyme QlO.The increased white count usually normalizes after amalgam removal. However methyl mercury inhibits macrophage functions such as migration and phagocytosis at lower levels. Exposure to mercury vapor causes decreased zinc and methionine availability. Body mercury burden was found to play a role in resistant infections such as Chlamydia trachomatis and herpes family viral infections. Mercury also blocks the immune function of magnesium and zinc (198.234. etc. Antigen specific LST-test was performed on a large number of patients with atopic eczema(323).463). Ceruloplasmin in plasma can be similarly affected by copper metabolism disfunction.(444.495. and lipid peroxidation(495. whose deficiencies are known to cause significant neurological effects(461.13 1). Large numbers of people undergoing amalgam removal have clinically demonstrated significant improvements in the immune system parameters discussed here and recovery and significant improvement in immune system problems in most cases surveyed(Section VI). Improvement of symptoms was obtained in 82% (160/l 96) of the patients within l-10 months.). Several studies found adverse health effects at mercury vapor levels of 1 to 5 mcg/M3 (35). which have been found to affect glutamate mediated excitability and apoptosis of nerve cells and effects on mitochondria(495.239.464.25 1. like SOD function.256. Mutations in the copper/zinc enzyme superoxide dismustase(SOD) have been shown to be a major factor in the motor neuron degeneration in conditions like familial ALS and similar effects on Cu/Zn SOD to be a factor in other conditions such as autism. I 19) These effects can be reduced by zinc suppIementation(464. Similar results have been obtained at other cIinics(455).489). Several chronic neurological conditions involving copper metabolic disorders are well documented like Wilson’s Diseaseand Menkes Disease. 38% to Au and 40% to Pd They removed LST positive dental metals from the oral cavities of patients.464). lipoic acid.using T-cells of peripheral blood.38). This condition can result in zinc deficient SOD and oxidative damage involving nitric oxide. The low Zn levels result in deficient CuZnSuperoxide dismustase (CuZnSOD). Vit E. Copper is an essential trace metal which plays a fundamental role in the biochemistry of the nervous system(489. 87% to Ni. Nacetylcysteine. Mercury from amalgam fillings has also been found to cause increase in white blood cells and in some cases to result in leukemia(35.496.38. while reducing lipid peroxidations(494a). Some of the antioxidants were also found to have protective effects through increasing catalase and SOD action. White cell levels decline after total dental revision(TDR) and some have .495.180.495.

l SO). Mercury. for which mercury is a known cause(43. and treatment of cavitations where necessary(35). including to mercury preservatives such as thimerosal. A high percentageof patients with oral mucosal problems along with other autoimmune problems such as CFS have significant immune reactions to mercury.342.202.160) as well as with MRI positive patients for brain damage. low level mercury exposure was found to causeadverse immune system response. copper(32%). beryllium(74%).182. This also results in inflammatory processes that cause muscle tissue damage and result in higher levels of urinary excretion of creatinine . Of the many thousands who have had the Clifford immune reactivity test(445). the following percentages were immune reactive to the following metals that have very common exposures: aluminum(91%). nickel crowns. extraction of root canaled teeth.86.234. Toxic/allergic reactions to metals such as mercury often result in lichen planus lesions in oral mucosa or gums and play a roll in pathogenesis of periodontal disease. 61% also had .375. The majority studied were also found to have increased Th2 inflammatory cytokine activity and a blunted DHEA response curve to I. cadmium(63%). mercury(93%).90.212.235. 6. 94% of such patients had significant immune reactions to inorganic mercury(MELISA test) and 72% had immune reactions to low concentrations of HgCl2(<0. antimony(36%).101. toxic.369. Similarly nickel crowns and gold crowns over amalgam have been found to be a factor in lupus(456.1 52) Nickel and beryllium are 2 other metals commonly used in dentistry that are very carcinogenic.133. People with chronic and immune reactive problems are increasing finding dental materials are a factor in their problems and getting biocompatiblity tests run to test their immune reactivity to the various dental materials used.456).palladium. 87.229) and Belle’s Palsy from which some have recovered after TDR and Felderkrais exercises(35). blocking the ATP energy function (35. zinc(33%). taurine. Nickel ceramic crowns and root canals have also been found to be a factor in some breast cancer and some have recovered after TDR.1 I 8. Among a group of patients testing positive as allergic to mercury.232. and trimethyl amine oxide in FM(474).90.313. ATCH indicative of hypothalamic deficiency such as relative glucocorticoid deficiency(472).119. Mercury also interrupts the cytochrome C oxidase system. A high percentage of such patients test immune reactive to many of the toxic metals.232. tin(32%). including effects on vitro production of tumor necrosis factor TNF alfa and reductions in interleukin-1 . lead(68%).141. palladium.3 13). 7.468).81.75. silver(25%).recovered from leukemia after removal of amalgam fillings in a very short time(35.5 ug/ml). chromium(83%). (13 I. Controls without CNS problems did not have such positive correlations. nickel(98%). gold. replacement of metal crowns over amalgam. A high correlation has been found between patients subjectively diagnosed with CNS & systemic symptoms suggestive of mercury intoxication and immune reactivity to inorganic mercury(MELISA test. These effects along with reductions in red blood cells oxygen carrying capability often result in fatigue and reduced energy levels as well as neurological effects (35.60.V. and glycine in CFS. which includes amalgam replacement. and gold induce autoimmunity in genetically predisposed or highly exposed individuals(3 14.342. CFS and Fibromyalgia patients have also been found to commonly have abnormal enzymatic processes that affect among other things the sodium-potassium ATPase energy channels(473). Tests have found a significant portion of people to be in this category and thus more affected by exposure to amalgam than others(see section V).468).130.288). citrate.78.84.338~). arsenic(86%).35.313). choline.140. Removal of amalgam fillings usually results in cure of such lesions(60.3 13. and higher levels of excretion of choline.456.nickel.60.118. and cause DNA malformations(35. The majority of those with CFS having SPECT scans were found to have 5 times more areas of regional brain damage and reduced blood flow in the cerebral areas (47 1). cobalt(78%).82.43.168. and nickel( palladium(32%).

375).1 l%. palladium. chemical sensitivities.369.3 I 3. Only 2% were worse. In a group of patients tested by MELISA before and after amalgam removal at a clinic in Uppsala Sweden. diabetes.etc. 342. the patients reactivity to inorganic mercury.222.382.3% to palladium.34%. gold.369. and methyl mercury. were able to detect subjectively when a patch test used mercury salts in a double blind study(373).459. eczema.12%. Conditions involving allergies. Other studies have also found relatively high rates of allergic reactions to inorganic mercury and nickel(8 1. A group of patients that had amalgams removed because of chronic health problems. Of 50 patients suffering from serious fatigue referred for MELISA test(369). lead. gastrointestinal and neurological problems as are seen in CFS. Of the over 3.1%. In general immune activation from toxics such as heavy metals resulting in cytokine release and abnormalities of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis can cause changes in the brain. the following were the percentages testing positive: nickel.383). MS. gold and phenyl mercury all had highly significant differences from the control group. phenol mercury. 10% of controls had significant immune reactions to HgCl and 8.382. and oral lichen planus.375). After amalgam removal the immune reactivity to all of these metals other than nickel declined significantly.13%.468. fatigue. 60) such as profound fatigue.342. The rates of sensitization were even higher in some groups of CFS patients. myalgia.60). Such studies have also found that . and autoimmune thyroidititis.) Also using mercury in a patch test has resulted in some adverse health effects. 78% reported significant health improvements after replacement of amalgam fillings within a relatively short period.000 patients tested for lymphocyte reactivity to metals(60.section VI).453. and autoimmunity have been increasing rapidly in recent years(405).382. For groups with suspected autoimmune diseases such as neurological problems. Such symptoms usually improve significantly after amalgam removal. muscosketal pain. with over 20 % being highly reactive to each of these metals(375).2 12.456). ALS. silver.453.375). The study concluded that immune reactivity to mercury and palladium is common and appears to be allergenic/immune related in nature since immune reactivity declines when exposure levels are reduced. and 76% reported significant long term health improvements after 2 years. palladium.45g. The improvement in symptoms and lymphocyte reactivity imply that most of the Hg-induced lymphocyte reactivity is allergenic in nature. over 70% had significant immune reaction to inorganic mercury and 50% to nickel.381. etc. A high percentage were also reactive to nickel in both groups. Such hypersensitivity has been found most common in those with genetic predisposition to heavy metal sensitivity(342.323. lupus.35.35. Patients with other systemic neurological or immune symptoms such as arthritis. this is not generally recommended as a high percentage of such problems are resolved irrespective of the outcome of a patch test(87. Mercury has been found to impair conversion of thyroid T4 hormone to the active T3 form as well as causing autoimmune thyroiditis common to such patients(369. sleep disturbances.35. inorganic mercury. such as found more frequently in patients with HLA-DRA antigens(375.118. Scleroderma. cadmium.86. also often recover or improve significantly after amalgam replacement (12. which has been commonly used in root canals and cosmetics(3 13. A significant portions of the population appear to fall in this category. epilepsy. Hashimoto’s thyroiditis.229. and MELISA test found significant reduction in lymphocyte reactivity compared to pre removal tests(342.1 l%. most of the patients tested positive to inorganic mercury and most of such patients health improved significantly and immune reactivity declined after amalgam removal.168b.369.I 68.113.375.50d).385.60.90.375. 8. Fibromyalgia.23%.445.10 1.369. Of a group of 86 patients with CFS symptoms. with most patients also reactive to one or more other metals such as palladium. CFS.I I 1 1 1 I D I I I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I immune reaction to phenylHg. Although patch tests for mercury allergy are often given for unresolved oral symptoms. Other studies of patients suffering from chronic fatigue found similar results(369. cadmium. and severe psychological symptoms(379-382.468). CFS.

palladium.234.60. Chronic immune activation is common in CFS.130.270.and amalgam fillings induce immune reactions in many patients (91 .426. depression.226. but the sensitized group had a significantly higher average number of amalgam fillings and higher hair mercury levels. A high correlation has been found between patients subjectively diagnosed with CNS & systemic symptoms suggestive of mercury intoxication and immune reactivity to inorganic mercury(MELISA test.465.342. syndrome(CFS) through its effects on ATP and immune system(lymphocute reactivity.35.234.3 14). CFS patients usually improve and immune reactivity is reduced when amalgam fillings are replaced(342. anger and sudden bursts of anger/rage(434. Mercury vapor or Inorganic mercury have been shown in animal studies to induce autoimmune reactions and disease through effects on immune system T cells(226.33 l. The authors concluded that immune reactions have an important role in development of brain lesions .129. immune reactions and autoimmunity in animal studies (77. with increase in activated CD8+ cytotoxic T-cells and decreased NK cells(5 18).234.269.87. system 265. 10.nickel. 14.234. Eating fish was not a significant factor between sensitive and non.35).235. V. selfeffacement.sensitized students. a high percentage tested positive to nickel and/or inorganic mercury(MELISA). For MS and lupus patients.33e.456).383.215.35. 27.425.404). Mercury.44.229).342. 44% were positive for allergy to mercury( 156).I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I B’ I I 1 I deficiencies in detoxification enzymes such as glutathione transfereases cause increased susceptibility to metals and other chemicals(384).314. and gold induce autoimmunity in genetically predisposed or highly exposed individuals(60. A patch test was given to a large group of medical students to assess factors that lead to sensitization to mercury(l32). Mercury exposure through dental fillings appears to be a major factor in chronic fatigue 11. 81% of the group with health complaints had pathological MRl results including signs of degeneration of the basal ganglia of the 60% of the symptom group tested positive for immune system brain. Such deficiencies can be due to genetic predisposition. Tests have found a significant portion of people to be in this category and thus more affected by exposure to amalgam than others.270.233.3 13).168. which like mercury vapor crosses the blood-brain barrier.314).118)(270.405). 13% tested positive for allergy to mercury. Many studies of patients with major neurological diseases have found evidence . including lupus( 12.) . In a population of dental students tested.487). lack of strength/force to resolve doubts or resist obsessions or compulsions.34.60. suicidal thoughts. Medical Studies Finding Health Problems Related to Amalgam Fillings (other than immune) 1. but are also known to be caused by acute or chronic toxic exposures. reaction to mercury. etc. 9.38.45. 293. endometriosis (1.1 18) as well as with MRI positive patients for brain damage.480-483. but none in the controls.78. neutraphil activity.330.268.268.225. Controls without CNS problems did not have such positive correlations. and also and weakens the damages immune (222.Chrons Disease.3 13. Silver also is released from amalgam fillings and stored in the body and has been shown to cause immune complex deposits.3 14.369.113.3 13. lichen planus(86.286). Low level mercury exposure(as well as other toxic metals) including exposure to amalgam fillings has been found to be associated with increased autoimmune diseases (19.234. moodiness.90. Neurological problems are among the most common and serious and include memory loss. effects on T-cells and B-cells) as well as its promotion of growth of candida albicans in the body and the methylation of inorganic mercury by candida and intestional bacteria to the extremely toxic methyl mercury form.323. 270.269.

374. Other animal studies on rodents and monkeys have found brain cellular migration disturbances. memory problems (212. Studies have confirmed that there are vulnerable . Medical texts on neurology (21.305. The exposure levels in these studies are seen in the fetus and newborn babies of mother’s with amalgam fillings or who had work involving amalgam during pregnancy(61).271.etc. headache. impaired judgment and coordination. behavioral changes. Parkinson’s. which is a factor in neurological diseases such as depression and Alzheimer’s.287.372. Very high levels of mercury are found in brain memory areas such as the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of patients with diseases with memory related symptoms (l58.437). along with reduced learning and adaption capacity after low levels of mercury vapor exposure (149.207.33. loss of sexual drive.503b) point out that chronic mercurialism is often not recognized by diagnosticians and misdiagnosed as dementia or neurosis or functional psychosis or just “nerves”.229.295.285e.482). are often mistakenly ascribed to psychogenic causes”. Epidemiological studies have found that human embryos are also highly susceptible to brain damage from prenatal exposure to mercury.453).107. One study(305) found prenatal mercury vapor exposure decreased NGF concentration in newborn rat’s forebrain at 4 parts per billion(ppb) tissue concentration.264. abnormal glucose tolerance(hypoglycemia).254). etc.35. Animal studies of developmental effects of mercury on the brain have found significant effects at extremely low exposure levels. and other more serious neurological diseases such as MS. increased immunoreactivity for glial fibrillary protein at 1 nanamole (0. and Alzheimer’s(see # 25).175. which mercury has also been found to be a cause of. Thus chronic exposure to low level mercury vapor can inhibit polymerzation of brain tubulin and creatinine kinase which are essential to formation of microtubules.295.333. Some factors that have been documented in depression are low serotonin levels.222. having much more effect than with individual exposure(35). nervousness.2 ppb) concentration. A study of people who received flu shots regularly found that if an individual had five consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) his/her chances of getting Alzheimer’s Disease is ten times higher than if they had one or no shots(475).56 ).27.109. Mercury causes decreased lithium levels.222). depression. excitability.45 1.34.294. emotional lability.295). Flu shots have mercury and aluminum which both are known to accumulate in the brain over time. ALS. decreased mental efficiency.210. “Early manifestations are likely to be subtle and diagnosis difficult: Insomnia. Diagnois of mercury toxicity can be made based on exposure history and 3 or more of such symptoms mercury is known to cause(2 1. The effects of mercury with other toxic metals have also been found to be synergistic. Studies of mercury studies on animals give results similar to that found the Alzheimer brain.320. Low serotonin levels and/or hypoglycemia have also been found in the majority of those with impulsive and violent behavior(48 1.amalgam fillings may play a major role in development of conditions such as depression schizophrenia (94. Another study(134) found general toxicity effects at 1 micromole levels in immature cell cultures.317.465). fatigue.35.27.305). (34. and low levels cause abnormal brain cell balance and neurological disturbances (280.212.465.212. levels commonly seen in those with amalgam fillings or in dental staff working with amalgam. mild tremor. and low folate levels(480-83).322.294. and microglial response at even lower levels.233.} Mercury(as well as toxins from root canals and cavitations) interact with brain tubulin and disassemblesmicrotubules that maintain neurite structure(207b. Lithium protects brain cells against excess glutamate and calcium. One mechanism by which mercury has been found to be a factor in aggressiveness and violence is its documented inhibition of the brain neurotransmitter acetylcholinesterase( 175.

and mercury is documented to commonly cause hypothyroidism. lowering immune growth factor IGF-I levels and .181.119.K)ATPase in dose dependent manner and inhibits dopamine and noreprenephrine uptake by synaptosomes and nerve impulse transfer(288.24/ 39. both chronically or as a transient condition(458. etc.50. but adverse effects such as increases in blood pressure and cognitive effects have been documented as low as 1 ug/L. Mercury vapor or inorganic mercury exposure affects the posterior cingulate cortex and causes major neurological effects with sufficient exposure(428. erythism. Mercury has an effect on the fetal nervous system at levels far below that considered toxic in adults.175.270. 2. Mercury alters calcium homeostasis and calcium levels in the brain and affects gene expression and neurotransmitter release through its effects on calcium. with 50 % inhibitition in animal studies at 13 ppb(333.232.305). M ercury also interrupts the cytochrome oxidase system. Motor neuron dysfunction and loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have been attributed to several different mechanisms. tremor.338~).I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I periods during brain and CNS development that are especially sensitive to neurotoxic exposures and affect development processes and results(429).338~.305. ADD. They also block or inhibit calcium Lchannel currents in the brain in an irreversible and concentration dependent manner. . etc. 255. and increased calcium and altered calcium homeostatis apper to be a common denominator. Exposure to mercury and 4 other heavy metals tested for in a study of school children accounted for 23% of the variation in test scores for reading. as well as inhibiting phorbal ester binding(43. Protein Kinase C (PKC) regulates intracellular and extra cellular signals across neuronal membranes. Prenatal/early postnatal exposure to mercury affects level of nerve growth eczema. spelling and visual motor skills(3). Calcium plays a major role in the extreme neurotoxicity of mercury and methyl mercury. Metallic mercury is much more potent than methyl mercury in such actions. resulting in reduced volume for cerebellum and organs and subtle deficiencies(38. The upper level of mercury exposure recommended by the German Commission on Human Biomonitoring is 10 micrograms per liter in the blood(39). A Canadian study found that blood levels of five metals were able to predict with a 98% accuracy which children were learning disabled(3).10). Exposure of developing neuroblastoma cells to sub-cytotoxic doses of mercuric oxide resulted in lower levels of neurofilament proteins than unexposed cells(305).175.329. and reduction in lQ(3.329).210. Some conditions found to be related to such toxic exposures include autism. Mercury vapor exposure causes impaired cell proliferation in the brain and organs.288.84. but neural development extends through adolescence. and background levels of mercury in mothers correlate significantly with incidence of birth defects and still births (23. schizophrenia.4 12).43.508. etc.56. oxidative stress and free radical damage.453).35).).The fetal period is most sensitive.38. with impacts higher in low birth weight babies(39). Spatial and temporal changes in intracellular calcium concentrations are critical for controlling gene expression and neurotransmitter release in neurons(432. dyslexia.333. Maternal hypothyroidism has been found to cause endocrine system abnormalities in the fetus.305.259.264. blocking the ATP energy function (35. and both forms of mercury inhibit PKC at micromolar levels.2 1. These alterations are not mutually exclusive. Both inhibit cellular calcium ATPase and calcium uptake by brain microsomes at very low levels of exposure (270. and neurofilament aggregation and dysfunction of transport mechanisms(507).432). Some of the resulting conditions include stomatitis. factor(NGF) in the brain and causes brain damage and imbalances in development of the brain (38.511).110.285~.432.287. mitochondrial dysfunction.38. Several studies found that mercury causes learning disabilities and impairment. glutamate excitotoxicity. ADD. including increased intracellular calcium.279).149).509.50. Mercury inhibits sodium and potassium (N.

and CD8-t supressor immune cells than a group of MS patients with amalgam replaced.343). have a function of neutralizing excess glutamate by transforming it to glutamic acid.13 l). Astrocytes.496). neurofilaments.346.478.515. gastrointestinal (2 lc) and neurological problems along with other CFS symptoms and Fibromyalgia (342.4 12. IGF-1 protects against brain and neuronal pathologies like ALS. musculoskeletal pain.496) which are responsible for much of the Fibromyalgia symptoms and a factor in neural degeneration in MS and ALS. Metals like mercury bind to SH-groups(sulphydry1) in sulfur compounds like amino acids and proteins. Nitric oxide related toxicty causedby peroxynitrite formed by the reaction of NO with superoxide anions. Mercury and cadmium also have been found to intefere with zinc binding to MBP(5 17b) which affects MS symptoms since zinc stabilizes the association of MBP with brain myelin(5 17a).4 16.497).3 86. Such binding and autoimmune damage has been documented in the fat-rich proteins of the myelin sheaths of the CNS(478) and collagen(405).142.496. increases in inflammatory cytokines such as caused by toxic metals trigger increased free radical activity and damage to astrocyte and astrocyte finrction( 152).13).119).5 15. Metals by binding to SH radicals in proteins and other such groups can cause autoimmunity by modifying proteins which via T-cells activate B-cells that target the altered proteins inducing autoimmunity as well as causing aberrant MHC 11expression on altered target cells(425de. This often results in the immune systems T-cells not recognizing them as appropriate nutrients and attacking them(226). Mercury has been found to be a common cause of Fibromyalgia(293.rnction(119. hemoglobin. Mercury lymphocyte reactivity and effects on glutamate in the CNS induce CFS type symptoms including profound tiredness. and Fibromyalgia by protecting the astrocytes from this destructive process. If astrocytes are not able to rapidly neutralize excess glutamate.346.369. another amino acid excitory neurotransmitter) cause increased sensitivity to pain .516).333. thyroxine.226a. Antioxidants like lipoic acid which counteract such free radical activity have been found to alleviate symptoms and decrease demyalination(494c). Mercury and increased glutamate activate free radical forming processes like xanthine oxidase which produce oxygen radicals and oxidative neurological damage(346. causing swelling and neurotoxic effects( 119.375. and myelin basic protein(MBP) (269ag.333. Animal studies have confirmed that increased levels of glutamate(or aspartate. sleep disturbances. then a buildup of glutamate and calcium occurs.478. causing increased glutamate and calcium related neurotoxicity(l19. T-cells. Studies have also found mercury and lead cause autoantibodies to neuronal proteins. changing the structure of the compound that it is attached to. Astrocytes are common cells in the CNS involved in the feeding and detox of nerve cells.both found in CFS/Fibromyalgia. a type of cell in the brain and CNS with the task of keeping clean the area around nerve cells. and ALS(346.516). MS. which also causes inflow of calcium.496). as well as higher body temperature.impairing astrocyte fi. Mercury and other toxic metals inhibit astrocyte function in the brain and CNS( 119.496).369. Immune and autoimmune mechanisms are thus seen to be a major factor in neurotoxicity of metals. which are affected in MS.152. and more excurbations of MS than those without(l02a). which results in nitration of tyrosine residues in neurofilaments and manganese Superoxide . Glutamate is the most abundant amino acid in the body and in the CNS acts as excitory neurotransmitter (346. A group of metal exposed MS patients with amalgam fillings were found to have lower levels of red blood cells. hemocrit. MS has also been found to commonly be related to inflamatory activity in the CNS such as that caused by the reactive oxygen species and cytokine generation caused by mercury and other toxic metals (405.5% of men(368).405. Parkinson’s.416.527) . This is also a factor in conditions such as CFS.152. which based on a Swedish survey occurs in about 12% of women over 35 and 5.416.

202. Neurological effects have been documented at very low levels of exposure(urine Hg< 4 ug/L).370). Vit B6. significantly more neurological. One of the studies at a German University( 199) assessed20.34.453).202.108. memory. 258.290.306). nicotine. sleep.17.212.262). inhibition of the glutamate transporter.107. and mood problems( 1). Extremely toxic anaerobic bacteria from root canals or cavitations formed at incompletely healed tooth extraction sites have also been found to be common factors in Fibromyalgia and other chronic neurological conditions such as Parkinson’s and ALS. and glutamate-induced neurotoxicity involved in ALS(524.437).202.43. Mercury also accumulates in the heart and (35. and blocks entry of calcium ions into the cytoplasm (1. blocking the ATP energy function( 12. with condensing osteitis which must be removed with a surgical burr along with 1 mm of bone around it( Amalgam fillings have been found to be related to higher blood pressure. Cavitations have been found in 85% of sites from wisdom tooth extractions tested and 55% of molar extraction sites tested(35. Both mercury and methyl mercury have been shown to cause depletion of calcium from the heart muscle and to inhibit myosin ATPase activity by 50% at 30 ppb(59). 4.205. Mercury also interrupts the cytochrome oxidase system.22.222. Medical studies and doctors treating Fibromyalgia have found that supplements which cause a decreasein glutamate or protect against its effects have a positive effect on Fibromyalgia and other chronic neurologic conditions.222.306.222. chest pains. Mg and Zn induced excessive absorption of divalent metal cations which accelerates oxidant-mediated neuronal degenerations in a genetically susceptible population(466).69. A recent study assessedthe large decrease in ALS incidence in Guam and similar areas to look for possible explanations in the cause of past high incidence and recent declines.17.255. etc.reducing blood supply to the tissues (34.160.000 people.257.494a). ginseng.60.70. One of the studies conclusions was that a likely major factor for the high ALS rates in Guam and similar areas in the past was chronic dietary deficiency since birth in Ca.35). Numerous studies have found long term chronic low doses of mercury cause neurological.119.35) and adversely affects the vascular response to norepinephrine and potassium. choline.. vitamins C and E(444.270c) and damage blood vessels.140. Mercury’s effect on pituitary gland vasopressin is a factor in high blood pressure(35). mood. hemoglobin irregularities.119.160.306). L-camitine. Organic tin compounds formed from amalgam are even more Studies of groups of patients with amalgam fillings found neurotoxic than mercury (222.74. 108. and behavioral problems than the control groups.(20 1.338c) and impairing These effects often result in fatigue and reduced energy levels astrocyte mnction( 119). behavior. (3.437). tachycardia. memory.495e). The incidence is likely somewhat less in the general population.199.232.14 1. NAC(54.494e).35 1. damages myocardial and heart valves (Turpayev. as well as reducing NK-cells in the blood and .313). Some that have been found to be effective include CoQ10(444).I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 Dimustase(SOD) has been found to cause inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.84. methyl cobalamine(B 12). and at 100 ppb can destroy the membrane of red blood cells(35. 182.lO7. and omega 3 fatty acids(fish and flaxseed oi1)(417. levels commonly received by those with amalgam fillings(290).2 (35)) & (59.140. Mercury binds to hemoglobin oxygen binding sites in the red blood cells thus reducing oxygen carrying capacity(332. There is also evidence that fetal or infant exposure causes delayed neurotoxicity evidenced in serious effect at middle age(255. ginkgo biloba and pycnogenol(494a). Mercury also increases cytosolic free calcium levels in lymphocytes in a concentration-dependant manner causing influx from the extracellular medium(270c). 3.

226. and significant health problems to be related such as arthritis. those testing positive had significantly higher average number of amalgam fillings than those not testing positive(and higher levels of mercury in urine( 132. People with amalgam fillings have an increased number of intestinal microorganisms resistant to mercury and many standard antibiotics(35. 5. 178. with most cases seeing significant increase in oxyhemoglobin level and reduction in porphyrin levels along with 100% experiencing improved energy. Patch tests for hypersensitivity to mercury have found from 2% to 44% to test positive (87. I 86. Based on these studies and statistics for the number with 10 or more fillings. developmental.161. MCS. The problem occurs in extractions that are not cleaned out properly after extraction(437).222.117.369). cerebral hemorrhage. 44% tested allergic. The most sensitive reactions are immune reactions.161.264. and root canals also can cause high porphyrins. 6. However lowering cholesterol levels by other means below 160 correlates with much higher rates of depression. Supplements such as glucosamine sulfate and avoidance of orange juice and caffeine have been found to be beneficial in treating arthritic conditions as well(35). increasing as a protective measure against metals toxicity. and deaths.272. etc. Mercury is extremely toxic and kills many beneficial bacterial. The average for those with amalgams is over 3 time that of those without. and similar for strains of bacteria in U. Recent studies have found that drug resistant strains of bacteria causing ear infections. cancer. A study funded by the Adolf Coors Foundation(232) found that toxicity such as mercury is a significant cause of abnormal cholesterol levels. enzyme nerve growth inhibition. violent deaths. Mercury.267).spleen. cavitations.357). be much larger and patch tests do not measure the total population getting toxic reactions from mercury.204. but some forms of bacteria can alter their form to avoid being killed by adding a plasmid to their DNA making the bacteria mercury resistant.437).389). tuberculosis. oxygen carrying capacity. and that cholesterol levels usually normalize after amalgam replacement. the percent of Americans allergic to mercury just from this group would be about 17 million people especially However.41O-412/l 49. and CFS. and have found that after reducing mercury burden antibiotic . DNA mutations. I 17. Studies have found a significant correlation between mercury resistance and multiple antibiotic resistance (I 16. the total would vulnerable to increased immune system reactions to amalgam fillings. and toxins such as anaerobic bacteria and other toxics which significantly inhibit body enzymatic processes in virtually all cavitations(437). Of the dental students with 10 or more fillings at least 5 years old. In studies of medical and dental students. and pneumonia more than doubled since 1996. These toxins have been found to have serious systemic health effects in many cases.305.38.296. systemic effects inhibition.all known to be affected by mercury effects(35). rivers(53).156.(35. The interruption of the ATP energy chemistry results in high levels of porphyrins in the urine(260). suicide. The FDA has approved a test measuring porphyrins as a test for mercury poisoning.S. CFS. Alzheimer’s. These have been found to be factors along with amalgam in serious chronic conditions such as MS. However some other dental problems such as nickel crowns.292. The study also found that mercury has major adverse effects on red and white blood cells.149. Cavitations are diseased areas in bone under teeth or extracted teeth usually caused by lack of adequate blood supply to the area.270. with pattern indicating likely source and the level extent of damage.116. and other toxics have different patterns of high levels for the 5 types of porphyrins.154.260). But this transformation also increases antibiotic resistance and results in adversely altered populations of bacteria in the intestines.263.156).175. and porphyrin leveIs(232). and (34. Tests by special equipment(Cavitat) found cavitations in over 90% of areas under root canals or extracted wisdom teeth that have been tested. MCS. much higher for groups with more amalgam fillings and length of exposure than those with less. and is over 20 times normal for some severely poisoned people(232. ALS. sinusitis.lead.61.

These exist in almost every enzymatic process in the body. etc. 114.40).222. Some of the gastrointestional problems caused by mercury include poor mineral absoroption.3 17).000 subjects at a German university found a significant relation between the number of amalgam fillings with periodontal problems. 8. bloating.211. an intervention studies agree(9. 9. B12-vitamin. HgC12 also has been found to impair function of other organelles such s lysomomes that maintain transmembrane proton gradient.180. and tetrahydrofolate supplementation has helped to boost the protective sulfite oxidase. cell culture studies.146).etc. a Gynecological Clinic that sees a large number of women suffering from alopecia/hair loss that was not responding to treatment had amalgams replaced in 132 women who had not responded to treatment. autism. ALS. Mercury from amalgam thus has the potential to disturb all metabolic processes(25. diarrhea. 68 % of the women then responded to treatment and alopecia was alleviated( 187). Based on this finding.ll I.203.60.438). PSP-vitamin.33 I .197}.1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I resistance declines (251. Mercury exposure has been shown to adversely affect kidney function in occupational and animal studies (20. 194). along with a deficiency in sulfates required for many body functions. Higher levels of hormone disturbances. gammablocking of enzyme glutamyltraspeptidase(GGC) and sulfite oxidase.389. but adverse effects have been seen at lower levels and . which is normally quenched by pyruvate and catalase(203).194. The Government’s toxic level for mercury in urine is 30 mcg/L (189). Mercury from amalgam binds to the -SH (suhhydryl) groups. In other studies involving amalgam removal. hormones. B 1-vitamin.(21c. 33.194.405). rheumatoid arthritis.) 7.111. 35. resulting in inactivation of sulfur and functions such as cysteine dioxygenase(CDO). stomatis. Other clinics have also found alleviation of hair loss/alopecia after amalgam removal and detox(40. nerve tissue.260. and gastrointestinal problems( 199).228b35. One study found levels ranging from 2 1 to 8 10 ppb. and recurrent fungal infections were also found in the amalgam group. A study of levels in kidney donors found an average of 3 times higher mercury level in those with amalgams versus those without( 14c). including Parkinson’s. The results of hormone tests. Another study in Japan found significantly higher levels of mercury in gray hair than in dark hair(402). A large study of 20. In some cases.35.33. immune disturbances. MCS. wasting disease. Richardson(Health Canada) has estimatedthat about 20% of the population suffers a subclinical impairment of kidney or CNS function related to amalgam mercury(209c).56. producing sulfur metabolites with extreme toxicity that the body is unable to properly detoxify(33. and to decreaseglutathione pcroxidase activity in the kidneys while upregulating heme oxidase function. The alteration of intestinal bacterial populations necessary for proper digestion along with other damage and membrane permeability effects of mercury are major factors in creating “leaky gut” conditions with poor digestion and absorption of nutrients and toxic incompletely digested compounds in the bloodstream(338. lupus. the majority had significant improvement (40. infertility.5 14.56. Mercury accumulates in the kidneys with increasing levels over time. neurological problems. and also in those with more than average number of amalgam fillings(254). Alzheimer’s.2 1c. etc(330. Sulfur is essential in enzymes.9).21. Mercury also blocks the metabolic action of manganese and the entry of calcium ions into cytoplasm(333). Allergies and hair-loss were found to be 2-3 times as high in a group with large number of amalgam fillings compared to controls( 199.). and red blood cells.338.464.146). Inorganic mercury exposure has been found to exert a dosedependent cytotoxicity by generating extremely high levels of hydrogen peroxide. Mercury is transported throughout the body in blood and can affect cells in the body and organs in different ways.35. Levels of mercury in follicular fluid was significantly higher for those with amalgam fillings (9.etc. and appears to be a major factor in these conditions. Molybdenum. Blocked or inhibited sulfur oxidation at the cellular level has been found in most with many of the chronic degenerative diseases.317).

It’s now estimated that up to 85 per cent of the sperm produced by a healthy male is DNA-damaged(433).366).433.105.296). Mercury has an effect on the fetal nervous system at levels far below that considered toxic in adults.100.255.31. Abnormal sperm is also being blamed for a global increase in testicular cancer.25. spontaneous abortions. Mercury vapor exposure causes impaired cell proliferation in the brain and organs. increased uterine and decreased fertility and in fibroids/endometritis. Since mercury(al1 forms) is documented from studies of humans and animals to be a reproductive mercury can reduce and developmental toxin(23.10.282. For these reasons it is important that no new gold dental work be placed in the mouth until at least 6 months after replacement.which is 1000 times less than a micro amp(28). Clinical evidence lead to hormone imbalances that can reduce indicates that amalgam fillings fertility(9.3 1.S. Amalgam fillings produce electrical currents which increase mercury vapor release and may have other harmful effects( 19.3 Mercury from amalgam fillings is transferred to the fetus of pregnant women and children who breast feed at levels often higher than those of the mother( 18.41. Many governments have bans or restrictions on use of amalgam by women of child-bearing age. depression. in animals(4.4. For this reason urine tests are not a reliable measure of mercury toxicity( ATSDR mercury health MRL of 0. Negatively charged fillings or crowns push electrons into the oral cavity since saliva is a good electrolyte and cause higher mercury vapor losses(35. increased infertility and abortions at low levels of methyl mercury( 162.20. Studies have found that mercury accumulates in the ovaries and testes.458). The central nervous system operates on signals in the range of nano-amps. currently U.338~.28. 10.210. birth defects. humans(9.10.2 mcgA43 which is exceeded by any dental work involving amalgam(Section III).224. 12. Researcher’s advise pregnant women should not be exposed to mercury vapor levels above government health standards ( .162.35. abnormal sperm.503). Patients with autoimmune conditions like MS.4.395. with some measuredat over 4 micro amps.61.361). etc.35.227.182. causes chromosome breaks. 186.305). or birth defects( 11.305.38. and background levels of mercury in mothers correlate significantly with incidence of birth defects and still births( 10. Subfertile males in Hong Kong were found to have 40% more mercury in their hair than fertile controls(55).104.255.61. The Huggins total dental revision(TDR) protocol calls for teeth with the highest negative charge to be replaced first(35).159. and other reproductive conditions.38l. .105. Studies in monkeys have found decreased sperm motility. affects DNA in sperm.146.27. Other protocols for amalgam removal are available from international dental associations like IAOMT( 153) and mercury poisoned patients organizations like DAMS(447). reproductive function and cause birth defects and developmental problems in chi1dren(2.281).. causes aberrant numbers of chromosomes in cells.29.192.61. Studies indicate an increase in the rate of spontaneous abortions with an increasing concentration of mercury in the fathers’ urine before pregnancy(37).287. resulting in reduced volume for cerebellum and organs and subtle deticiencies( or epilepsy.24.). inhibits enzymes necessary for sperm production. Some studies have also found persons with chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields(EMF) to have higher levels of mercury exposure and excretion(28) and higher liklidhood of getting chronic conditions like ALS(526).112.197.367).61.365). increased sperm abnormalities and spontaneous abortions.192).105.194). etc.104.36.9. Mercury has been found to cause decreased sperm volume and motility . In studies of women having miscarriages or birth defects.23.all of which can cause infertility.159. husbands were found to typically have low sperm counts and significantly more visually abnormal sperm(393).146.23. are often found to have a lot of high negative current fillings(35). These currents are measured in micro amps.low levels in urine often mean high mercury retention and chronic toxicity problems.216.260.

3 12. The pituitary gland controls many of the body’s endocrine system functions and secretes hormones that control most bodily processes.l g- the types showing the highest level of antibody reductions after amalgam removal include thyroglobulin and microsomal thyroid antigens(91) 15.186). Both types of mercury were found to cause denaturing of protein. thyroid gland(50.289.462. ADD(285e.504b).405. Such hormonal secretions are affected at levels of mercury exposure much lower than the acute toxicity effects normally tested.244. Parkinson’s.35).160. and many hormonal functions at very low levels of exposure (9.38.346. which is essential in production of neurotransmitters.325. There has been no evidence found that there is any safe level of mercury in the body that does not kill cells and harm body processes(WHO.and autism. 84.56).3 12. MS(l02. in addition to many problems caused by hormonal imbalances. MS.105.372.170.204.).41.56. Among those with chronic immune system problems with related immune antibodies.248.381). Mercury exposure causes high levels of oxidative stress/reactive oxygen species(ROS)(13. Tetrahydrobiopterin. Such patients have abnormal inhibition of neurotransmitter production. The level of mercury released by amalgam fillings is often more than the levels documented in medical studies to produce adverse effects and above the U.13.442).221.423. is significantly decreased in patients with Alzheimer’s’s’s.158.257.3 1. which has been found to be a major factor in neurological . These effects result commonly in a reduction in thyroid production(50) and an accumulation in the thyroid of radiation. government health guidelines for mercury exposure(see previous text). Such symptoms improved for most patients after administration of R-tetrahydrobiopterin (4 12).250. 35). Mercury also damages the blood brain barrier and facilitates penetration of the brain by other toxic metals and substances (311). Parkinson’s(98.369). with methyl mercury inhibiting ATP function at even lower levels(50.300.97.382. hypothalamus.258. and some after 5-formyltetrahydrofolate. Low levels of mercuric chloride also inhibit ATPase activity in the thyroid. Many studies of patients with major neurological or degenerative diseases have found evidence amalgam fillings may play a major role in development of conditions such as such as Alzheimers (66. and 5-HTP(4 12).372. Mercury damage thus commonly results in poor bodily temperature control.46 l. Low noncytotoxic levels of mercury induce dose dependent binding of mercury to DNA and significantly increased cell mutations (142. ALS(92. The hypothalamus regulates body temperature and many metabolic processes. 18.194. 2 10. 16.238. tyrosine and tryptophan transport into neurons(27.295.183. Mercury depletes and weakens the immune system in many ways documented throughout this paper. disrupting function of the pituitary gland.291. Mercury and other toxic metals such as copper and lead cause breaks in DNA(4.146. but inorganic mercury was more potent.296) and also have synergistic effects with x-rays(296) .257.272. including the immune system and reproductive systems(105.326.169.38. Low levels of mercury and toxic metals have been found to inhibit dihydroteridine reductase .35).35).30. tyrosine(257). Mercury has been well documented to be an endocrine system disrupting chemical in animals and people.363.324. 17.459).212.342.229. Toxic metal exposure’s adverse influence on thyrocytes can play a major role in thyroid cancer etiology( 144) .369. etc. enzyme production processes ( mercury also promotes cancer in other ways.412). etc.33.36-44.166. This was found to cause severe impaired amine synthesis and hypokinesis. ALS. This is especially so for the pituitary gland of the developing fetus where mercury has been shown to accumulate and which is the most sensitive to mercury(2-4. which affects the neural system function by inhibiting transmitters through its effect on phenylalanine.4) and birth defects(l97.35).105).163. In addition to effects on DNA.302.S. 14.l83.

442). urine. Parkinson’s.229b.(supplements which inhibit breach of the blood brain barrier such as bioflavonoids have been found to slow such neurological damage). 20 at high levels of Hg exposure.56. 4 16.327. Mercury has been found to accumulate preferentially in the primary motor function related areas such as the brain stem. Parkinson’s. This means that these patients have insufficient sulfates available to carry out .244. Mercury depletion of GSH and damage to cellular mitochondria and the increased lipid peroxidation in protein and DNA oxidation in the brain appear to be a major factor in Parkinson’s disease(33.291. with the average being 500% higher than controls(330.33 1.324. Many studies of patients with major neurological or degenerative diseaseshave found evidence amalgam fillings play a major role in development of conditions such as such as ALS (48. Most recovered after mercury detox.326).325. Lupus(SLE). Such conjugates are found to be highest in the brain substantia nigra with similar conjugates formed with L-Dopa and dopamine in Parkinson’s disease(56).326.291. which enervate the skeletal muscles(48.289. Mercury penetrates and damages the blood brain barrier allowing penetration of the barrier by other substances that are neurotoxic (20. Studieshave found mercury related mental effects to be indistinguishable from those of MS (207. Increased formation of reactive oxygen species(ROS) has also been found to increase formation of advancedglycation end products(AGEs) that have been found to cause activation of glial cells to produce superoxide and nitric oxide.442.3 I l/262).372). This was found to cause severe impaired amine synthesis and hypokinesis. dorsal root ganglia.291. Clinical tests of patients with MND. which is necessaryto mitigate reactive damage. Another study (145) that reviewed occupational exposure data found that occupational exposure to manganeseand copper have high odds rations for relation to PD.97. Alzheimer’s’s. and MS.139). rhombencephalon. with one study finding 300% higher than controls(271).329. and in general being poor sulphur oxidizers.92. and likewise higher risk for those who have had amalgam fillings more than 15 years(324) One study found higher than average levels of mercury in the blood.85. 324. with some requiring additional treatment for viruses and intestinal dysbiosis.327.346). rheumatoid arthritis and autism have found that the patients generally have elevated plasma cysteine to sulphate ratios.470. Mercury. MS patients have been found to have much higher levels of mercury in cerebrospinal fluid compared to controls (163. Such damage to the blood brain barrier’s function has been found to be a major factor in chronic neurological diseases such as MS(286. is significantly decreased in patients with Alzheimer’s’s’s.disease(56.183. and anterior horn motor neurons.478).207.301.302.184. tyrosine and tryptophan transport into neurons( 122.271. Large German studies including studies at German universities have found that MS patients usually have high levels of mercury body burden.423. which is essential in production of nerurotransmitters.35. as well as multiple exposures to these and lead.35). Such patients have abnormal inhibition of neurotransmitter production. Another study( 169) found blood and urine mercury levels to be very strongly related to Parkinson’s with odds ratios of approx. they can be considered part of a vicious cycle.287a). and the pattern of deposition is the same as that seen from morphological changes(327g.302.ALS.38.469. and hair of Parkinson’s disease patients(363). A Canadian study found those with 15 or more amalgam fillings to have more than 250% greater risk of MS than controls. but noted that this effect was only seen for exposure of over 20 years. Tetrahydro-biopterin. Low levels of toxic metals have been found to inhibit dihydroteridine reductase .105.2 12. cerebellum. which finally leads to neuronal cell death in the substantia nigra in PD(424).289.162.442).520.289.257. with exposure either to vapor or organic mercury tends to accumulate in the glial cells in a similar pattern. Mercury and quinones form conjugates with thiol compounds such as glutathione and cysteine and cause depletion of glutathione. which affects the neural system function by inhibiting brain transmitters through its effect on phenylalanine.222.33e).

causing excess membrane permeability. Low levels of available glutathione have been shown to increase mercury retention and increase toxic effects(l1 I).56). In many cases(many thousand documented)removal of amalgam fillings and treatment for metal toxicity led to “cure’ or significant improvement in health(see Section V). especially in terms of the blood-brain barrier (I 55. This appears to be a factor in susceptibility to Alzheimer’s’s disease.brain barrier.56. This can be a major factor in bone loss of calcium(osteoporosis).43). Also mercury binds with cell membranes interfering with sodium and potassium enzyme functions. Also. Mercury has been shown to be a factor that can cause rheumatoid arthritis by activating localized CD4+ T-cells which trigger production of immune macrophages and immunoglobulin(lg) producing cells in joints(405. are especially susceptible to this damage(207. Less than lppm mercury in the blood stream can impair the blood. with high levels of mercury in the brain (207).221. Mercury(like copper) also accumulates in areas of the eyes such as the endothelial layer of the cornea and macula and is a major factor in chronic and degenerative eye conditions such as iritis.514).180. myopia. damaged. Mercury causes an increase in white blood cells. Mercury was also found to accumulate in the mitochondria and interfere with their vital functions.33. or faulty enzymatic superoxide Dismustase (SOD) processes appear to be a major factor in cell apoptosis involved in the condition(443).38. blocked.338c. There is evidence that some forms of leukemia are abnormal response to antigenic stimulation by mercury or other such toxics. Mercury is known to damage or inhibit SOD activity(441. Mercury and methyl mercury impair or inhibit all cell functions and deplete calcium stores(96).84. with more createdto try to react to a foreign toxic substance in the body.346). and to be effective in treating not only depressive conditions but degenerative conditions like Huntington’s Disease which are related to such damage. The majority have an intermediate form Apo-E3.necessarybodily processes. and removal of amalgam has led to remission very rapidly in some cases(35. Mercury and the induced neurofibrillary tangles also appear to produce a functional zinc deficiency in the of AD sufferers(242)as well as causing reduced lithium levels which is another factor in such diseases. This has been found to produce inflamatory cytokins sch as IL-I and TNF that contribute to cartilage and bone destruction. while high levels of free cysteine have been demonstrated to make toxicity due to inorganic mercury more severe(333. it is documented that the process thus involves free radical/reactive oxygen species effects. cataracts. Persons with the Apo-E4 gene form of apolipoprotein E which transports cholesterol in the blood.194. It has been documented that conditions like depression and other chronic neurological conditions often involve damage and nerve cell death in areas of the brain like the hippocampus. and to inhibit cytochrome C enzymes which affect energy supply to the brain(43. and low levels of zinc(363.Mercury has been shown to diminish and block sulphur oxidation and thus reducing glutathione levels which is the part of this process involved in detoxifying and excretion of toxics like mercury(33).35).239).33e). and lithium has been found to not only prevent such damage but also promote cell gray matter cell growth in such areas(280). Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. and antioxidants have been found to have benefits in treatment(5 14).232. Glutathione is produced through the sulphur oxidation side of this process.33e). 20. astigmatism. Ones susceptibility can be estimated by testing for this condition. In one subtype of ALS. Most of these conditions have been found to improve after . black streaks on retina. Mercury at extremely low levels also interferes with formation of tubulin producing neurotibrillary tangles in the brain similar to those observed in Alzheimer’s patients.254).3 11).207.macula degeneration. 19. etc. Mercury has also been found to play a part in inducing intoleranceand neuronal problems through blockage of the P-450 enzymatic process(84. Lithium protects brain cells against excess glutamate induced excitability and calcium influx(280. while those with Apo-E2 which has extra cysteine and is a better mercury scavenger have less damage.111.

sinus problems (35.322).405.95.etc.35.440).271.35. endometriosis (229.34.440.440.35.233.453.453) MS(94.222.376. neuropathyfparesthesia (35.349. The above over 60.233.25 1. cancer(breast.470.485.168.blood conditions asthma(8.310.313.95.40.3 13.469.469.101.2 12.95. candida( body mercury levels increase significantly. pain/Fibromyalgia (35.376.35.376.35.404.115).107.322.222. chron’s disease(222. hearing loss( 102.222.3 17. vision disturbances(35.322. allergies(8.271. For the following case studies of amalgam replacement.486). joint dizzyness/vertigo(40.323. PMS(35.291. eczema and psoriasis (168b.89) Chronic conditions can worsen temporarily.470.35).469. antibiotic resistant infection(25 1).485). etc. some clinics primarily replaced amalgam fillings using patient protective measures and supportive supplements. muscle tremor Parkinson’s/ ALS(97.523).94.91. Alzheimer’s’s(204.3 17.322. Results of Removal of Amalgam Fillings 1.228.349.322. 2 12.etc.452. 13.2 12. (26.60.(82. 3.25 l).35). 1. muscular/joint infertility(9.342.222.94.35).57).233.322.229.94.465.322.342.102. pain/ arthritis(35.34. autoimmune thyroiditis(382.3 17.322.248.229.3 13.35.322). chronic eye conditions: inflamation/iritis/ astigmatism/myopia /cataracts/macula degeneration (35. 408.440.293.). 17.102.523).453. but usually improve if adequate precautions are taken to reduce exposure during removal.35. and those with 45 amalgam surfaces more than 6 times as much mercury( 12b).94. headaches/migraines( (205.322.229.95.459).2 12.2 patients gold or nickel crowns over amalgam are replaced by biocompatible alternatives.212. depression (94. anxiety & mental confusion ( but within 2 weeks levels fall significantly.440. 350.233.323).222.453).2 12.95.369.35). insomnia( susceptibility to infections ( stomach problems lupus( 12.233.322.91).322.369.469.232. anger(2 12.chronic sensitivities chemical multiple 317.212.469. On average those with 29 amalgam surfaces excreted over 3 times more mercury in urine after DMPS challange than those with 3 amalgam surfaces.222.322. immune system/ autoimmune problems (8.89.306.322).229. There are extensive documented cases (many thousands)where removal of amalgam fillings led to cure or significant improvement of serious health problems such as periodontal diseases(35.385.222.60.57).349.229.187.469. 1.82./leukemia) ( 17.222. 229. memory disorders (35.amalgam replacement(35.440.212. urinary/prostrate problems(2 12.40.) diabetes(35. whereas some clinics do something comparableto Hal Huggins total dental revision where in addition to amalgam replacement.349).88.423.3 13.440.222.1 15. Removal of amalgam fillings resulted in a significant reduction in body burden and body waste product load of mercury(75.3 17.000 cases of cure or significant .38.453.271. alopecia/hair loss ( skin conditions (2 12. (222.317.94. tachycardia and heart problems . 1.470.322).etc.229). 1.94.etc.523).35).222. (35.271.523.469.222. root canals extracted and cavitations checked for and cleaned. 2.469.35.376.271.95).375.75.etc.27 1. oral keratosis(pre cancer)(87.354.222. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ( 12. epilepsy (5.2 12.165.270.).485.233.93. (212. Total reduction in mercury levels in blood and urine is often over 80% within a few months(79.) VI.97. depending on protective measures taken.358.35. tinnitus(35.271. (294. For the week following amalgam removal.212. schizophrenia 376.35.367).40). 12.349.229. 229.271.35).

sciatic pain. irrational fear. etc. Details are available and case histories. the types showing the highest level of antibody reductions after amalgam removal include glomerular basal membrane. This appears to be due to migration of mercury into roots & gums that is not eliminated by simple filling replacement. and the average was 54. chest pain. in over 80% of cases for: depression. Some of the above cases used chemical or natural chelation to reduce accumulated mercury body burden in addition to amalgam replacement. poor memory. tender teeth. as a high percentage of those testing negative also recovered from chronic conditions after replacement of fillings(86. The Huggins TDR protocol includes testing teeth with metal for level of galvanic current caused by the mixed metals.6 micrograms mercury per cubic meter of air.87. or cancer may require more aggressive mercury removal techniques than simple filling replacement due to body burden. etc. and leg cramps. head aches/migraines. Other clinics reported similar success. nasal congestion or discharge. in over 60% of cases for: allergies. dizziness. Interviews of a large population of Swedish patients that had amalgams removed due to health problems found that virtually all reported significant health improvements and that the health . TDR and other measures used in metals detox have been found to increase T-cells and immune function in AIDS patients(35). throat irritation. one of the clinics(95) replacing amalgams in a large number of patients with chronic conditions had full recovery or significant improvement: in over 90% of casesfor: metallic taste.). 97% versus 37 to 88%(435). Among those with chronic immune system problems with related immune antibodies. fatigue. cold hands/feet. This has been found to improve recovery rate for chronic conditions like epilepsy and autoimmune conditions. Swedish researchers have developed a sophisticated test for immune/autoimmune reactions that has proved successful in diagnosing and treating environmentally caused diseases such as lichen planus. related to mercury and other immunotoxics(60. constipation.MS. Lupus. bad breath. diabetes. AD.302). skin reactions. heart problems. thyroglobulin.(35). extraction resulted in 85% recovery rate versus only 16% for filling replacement alone (222.).3 13. Some clinics using DMPS for chelation reported over 80% with chronic health problems were cured or significantly improved(222. For examaple.etc. urinary disorders.359). poor concentration/ADD.improvements were not isolated cases of cures.168. including himself with the population of over 6OO(approx. and microsomal thyroid antigens(91). The Huggins Clinic using TDR has successfully treated over a thousand patients with chronic autoimmune conditions like MS. the clinical studies indicated a large majority of most such type casestreated showed significant improvement. irratibility.dementia.27 1. But the recovery rate of those using dentists with special equipment and training in protecting the patient reported much higher success rates than those with standard training and equipment. In a large German study of MS patients after amalgam revision. far above the Government health guideline for mercury(2 17). That such mercury(and similarly bacteria) in the teeth and gums have direct routes to the brain and CNS has been documented by several medical studies(34.325. watery eyes. muscle fatigue. Clinical studies have found that patch testing is not a good predictor of success of amalgam removal.). ALS. insomnia. Other cases have found that recovery from serious autoimmune diseases. bleeding gums. and removal of the teeth with highest negative galvanic current first(35).etc.etc. 85%) who experienced significant improvement in MS. muscle tremor. A Jerome meter was used to measure mercury vapor level in the mouth. Metals are being pushed into the body from negatively charged metal dental work with saliva as electrolyte and the highest charged teeth lose the most metal to the body(35). and mouth sores. CFS. in over 70% of cases for: bloating or intestinal cramps.

Many studies using chemical chelators such as DMPS or DMSA have found post chelation levels to be poorly correlated with prechelation blood or urine levels(57.278. with high precoproporphyrin almost always high with mercury toxicity and often coproporphyrin. Feces is the major path of excretion of mercury from the body. In the early stages of mercury exposure before major systemic damage other than slight fatigue results you usually see high hemoglobin. For those with several fillings daily fecal mercury excretion levels range between 20 to 200 ug/day. The saliva test is another good test for daily mercury exposure.2 1abd.58). One researcher suggests that mercury levels in hair of greater than 5 ppm are indicative of mercury intoxication.115. plus low oxyhemoglobin(35).improvements were permanent(233). except that external occupational exposure can also affect hair levels. A new test approved by the FDA for diagnosing damage that has been caused by toxic metals like mercury is the fractionated porphyrin test(260. The average level of mercury in feces of populations with amalgam fillings is as much as 1 ppm and approx. as well as with occupational dental exposure and to be a good medium for monitoring internal mercury exposure. Hair mercury levels did not have a significant correlation with urine mercury in one study(340) and did not have a significant correlation to number of fillings(350).282).157. and lactic dehydroganese.6b). population this would represent over 17 million people who would benefit regarding allergies alone. which tend to correlate with recent exposure level (6b.183.503).183. Kidneys have a lot of hydroxyl(SH) groups which mercury binds to causing accumulation in the kidneys. liver.386. etc. so urine tests are not reliable for body burden after long term exposure. VII. with significant numbers of those with several filings having over 10 ppm and 170 times those without fillings(80). The pattern of which porphyrins are high gives an indication of likely toxic exposure. that measures amount of damage as well as likely source. alkatline phosphatase. For example 89% of those reporting allergies had significant improvements or total elimination. thyroid gland. extrapolated to U.528. For this reason many researchers consider feces to be the most reliable indicator of daily exposure level to mercury or other toxics.335. in later states you usually see marginal hemoglobin.36. pituitary gland. but high levels of DMPS can be dangerous to some peopleespecially those still having amalgam fillings or those allergic to sulfur drugs or sulfites. Mercury hair level in a population sampled in Madrid Spain ranged from I .21abd. Tests for Mercury Level or Toxicity and Treatment 1.79.35). though still not totally reliable and may be a better indicator for organic mercury than inorganic. 10 times that of a similar group without fillings (79. hemocrit.183. This study found a significant positive correlation between maternal hair mercury and mercury level in nursing infants. Provocation challenge tests after use of chemical chelators such as DMPS or DMSA also are effective at measuringbody burden(57.80. Hair was found to be significantly correlated with fish consumption.83. Mercury vapor passes through the blood rapidly(half-life in blood is 10 seconds(370)) and accumulates in other parts of the body such as the brain. hemocrit.25).5 ppm. but one study (340) found a significant . As damage occurs to kidneys over time. Thus blood test measures mostly recent exposure. Mercury blocks enzymes needed to convert some types of porphyrins to hemoglobin and adenosine tri phosphate(ATP).80. done commonly in Europe and representing one of the largest sources There is only a weak correlation between blood or urine mercury levels and of mercury exposure. mercury is less efficiently eliminated (11.57. kidneys. (study period 17 years) A compilation of an even larger population found similar results(212.278). and inhibiting excretion(503).S. body burden or level in a target organ(36.3 to 92. having a higher correlation to systemic body burden than urine or blood. Some researchers suggest hair offers a better indicator of mercury body burden than blood or urine(279.303).2 16.1 I .

g. excitotoxic amino acid(glutamate) brain injury. Zinc is a mercury and copper antagonist and can be used to lower copper levels and protect against mercury damage.g> 1. temperature.Vitamins C & E. 2. and those with 45 amalgam surfaces more than 6 times as much mercury( 12b).On average those with 29 amalgam surfaces excreted over 3 times more mercury in urine after DMPS challange than those with 3 amalgam surfaces. and motor deficits(290).with many studies finding a significant correlation amalgam level the number of chelation mercury and between post surfaces(57.LA.< 1.303). memory. gingko biloba. Use of EDTA may need to be restricted in those with high Hg levels. average mercury level is 3 to 4 ppm. s. Tests suggestedby HugginslLevy(35) for evaluation and treatment of mercury toxicity: (a) hair element test(386) (low hair mercury level does not indicate low body level)(more than 3 essential minerals out of normal range indicates likely metals toxicity) (b) CBC blood test with differential and platelet count 0 blood serum profile (d) urinary mercury (for person with average exposure with amalgam fillings. EDTA. 444). mitochondrial dysfunction.172. Lipoic acid and N-acetylcysteine(NAC) also increase glutathione levels and protect againstsuperoxide radical/peroxynitrite damage. so thus have an additional neuroprotective effect(494ab. has been found to dramatically increase excretion of inorganic mercury(over 12 fold). Note: during initial exposure to mercury the body marshals immune system and other measures to .222. Some researchers believe DMSA has less adverse side effects than DMPS and prefer to use DMSA for chelation for this reason. but should not be used with high copper. A common protocol for DMSA(developed to avoid redistribution effects) is 50 mg orally every 4 hours for 3 days and then off 11 days.54). N-acetylcysteine(NAC) has been found to be effective at increasing cellular glutathione levels and chelating mercury(54).290.273. shaking) (f) individual tooth electric currents(replace high negative current teeth first) (g) patient questionnaire on exposure and symptom history (h) specific gravity of urine(test for pituitary function.173.However one study(290) found significant effects at lower levels. Some studies have also found DMSA as more effective at removing mercury from the brain(58). Several doctors use 16 ug/L as the upper bound for mercury after DMPS challenge.008 consistent with and suicidal tendencies(35)) depression 3. Zinc induces metallothionein which protects against oxidative damage and increases protective enzyme activities and glutathione which tend to inhibit lipid peroxidation and suppress mercury toxicity(430. forms toxic compounds with mercury and can damage brain function(307).495e.correlation between pre and post chelation values when using DMPS. but to cause decreasedexcretion of organic mercury(494d) and copper. Challenge tests using DMPS or DMSA appear to have a better correlation with body burden and toxicity symptoms such as concentration .464).352). lower test level than this likely means person is poor excreter and accumulating mercury. often mercury toxic(35) (e) fractionated porphyrin(note test results sensitive to light. and pycnogenol have also been found protective against degenerative neurological conditions(494. diabetic neuropathy(494). s.521.292. Lipoic acid has been found to have protective effects against cerebral ischemic-reperfusion. Another chelator used for clogged arteries. and consider anyone with higher levels to have excessbody burden(222.022 normal. Coenzyme QlO. Experienced doctors have also found additional zinc to be useful when chelating mercury(222) as well as counteracting mercury’s oxidative damage(43). Lipoic acid has a protective effect regarding lead or inorganic mercury toxicity through its antioxidant properties(494). Also lipoic acid. Other antioxidants such as carnosine(495a).

Lupus. 0 extract all root canaled teeth using proper finish protocol..try to deal with the challenge. mercury toxicity likely and hard to treat since retaining mercury. Other measures in addition to TDR that have been found to help in treatment of MS in clinical experience are avoidance of milk products. aluminum. with supportive vitamin/mineral supplements. Huggins Total Dental Revision Protocol(35): (a) history questionnaire and panel of tests.3 ppm (p) immune reactive to mercury.5% saturated (j) T lymphocyte count < 2000 (k) DNA damage/cancer (1) TSH > I ug (m) hair aluminum > 10 ppm (n) hair nickel > 1. etc. VIII. periodic monitoring tests. and antioxidants have been found to have benefits in treatment(5 14).manganese. (d) test and treat cavitations and amalgam tattoos where relevant (e) supportive supplementation. 4.potassium. Also so some test indicator scores decline.5 ppm or < . etc. CFS. Parkinson’s. Health Effects from Dental Personnel Exposure to Mercury Vapor . nickel. it is documented that the process is inflamatory involving free radical/reactive oxygen species effects. Test results indicating mercury/metals toxicity(35): (a) white blood cell count >7500 or < 4500 (b) hemocrit > 50% or < 40% 0 lymphocyte count > 2800 or < 1800 (d) blood protein level > 7. In such cases where (calcium> 1100 or < 300 ppm) and low test mercury. so many test indicators will be high. (f) avoid acute exposures/challengeto the immune system on a weekly 7/l 4/2 I day pattern. supplementation of calcium AEP(448) and alpha lipoic acid(494). high mercury exposures with low hair mercury or urine mercury level usually indicates body is retaining mercury and likely toxicity problem(35). ALS. get lots of sunlight. (q) high hemoglobin and hemocrit and high alkaline phosphatase(alk phos) and lactic dehydrogenese(LDA) during initial phases of exposure.5 gm/lOO ml (e) triglycerides > 150 mg %ml (f)BUN>18or<12 (g) hair mercury > 1. after prolonged exposure the body inevitably lose the battle and measures to combat the challenge decreaseand immune system Chronic conditions are common during this phase. note: after treatmentof many casesof chronic autoimmune conditions such as MS. Also. evaluate need for further treatment(not usually needed).4 ppm (h) oxyhemoglobin level < 55% saturated (1) carboxyhemoglubin > 2.zinc. with low/marginal hemoglobin and hemocrit plus low oxyhemoglobin during long term chronic fatigue phase. Progesterone creme has been found to promote regrowth of myelin sheaths in animals(448c). Rheumatoid Arthritis. Alzheimer’s’s. (b) replace amalgam fillings starting with filling with highest negative current or highest negative quadrant. and most with these conditions improve after TDR if protocol is followed carefUlly(35). it has been observed that often mercury along with root canal toxicity or cavitation toxicity are major factors in these conditions.5 ppm (0) hair manganese> 0.

Urinary porphyrin profiles were found to be an excellent biomarker of level of body mercury level . is the country with the most exposure and health effects studies regarding amalgam. Mercury levels in blood of dental professionals ranged from 0. though the relationship was nonlinear and increased more with larger number of fiIlings(124).& 10. and urine levels in dental professionals from Swedish and European studies ranged from 0.etc. total T cell numbers(CD3).4 q/L and 1% had levels over 33.7 to 6.123.8 ug/L. while another group of dental student showed compromised immune systems compared to medical students.8 q/L with approx.3 to 36 microgram/liter(ug/L)(69. In general dental assistants and women dental workers showed higher levels of mercury than male dentists (171. 15% above 15.124.154c. and T suppressor/cytotoxic(CD4-CD8+) numbers were significantly elevated in the dental students compared to the matched control group(408).303.16.040 ppb. A group of dental students taking a course involving work with amalgam had their urine tested before and after the course was over.253. 3.253. which accumulates in their bodies to much higher levels than for most nonoccupationally exposed.).64.64.195. Studies have found that the longer time exposed. the sensitivity rate increased 5 fold to over 10%( 154~). Autopsies of former dental staff found levels of mercury in the pituitary gland averaged as high as 4.303). national sample of dentists provided by the American Dental Association had an average of 5.1. with study averages ranging from 1. In that large sample of dentists. with women having higher levels than men in general. the more likely to be allergic and the more effects(6b.253.99. One study found that over a 4 year period of dental school. and for 1987 found an average of 8. The Swedish safety guideline for Study averages for other countries ranged from mercury in urine is 5.173). with excretion levels after a dose of a chelator as high as 10 times the corresponding levels for controls(57.S. The total lymphocyte count.195. Dental offices are known to be one of the largest users of inorganic mercury(71 b.69.173. 16% above 13.6 to 57 ugL. In one study.17 I.178).2 ug/L (70. and with the number of fillings in the dentist(l71. They also found much higher levels in the brain occipital cortex(as high as 300 ppb). Allergy tests given to another group of dental students found 44% of them were allergic to mercury( 156). indicating daily exposure levels of over 100 ug/day. It is well documented that dentists and dental personnel who work with amalgam are chronically exposed to mercury vapor. Similar results have been seen in other studies as well(408).362). Sweden.6 q/L).290.290).6 q/L with approx. renal cortex(as high as 2110 ppb) and thyroid(as high as 28. 173.8 to Much higher accumulated body burden levels in dental personnel were found based on challenge tests than for controls(303).503a) .38). A large survey of dentists at the Norwegian Dental Assoc.222. meeting(171) found that the mean mercury level in 1986 was 7. Autopsy studies have found similar high body accumulation in dental workers. A U.397-399) and for blood (124.172.249). Mercury levels of dental personnel average at least 2 times that of controls for hair(397-40 I).1 ug/L with study averages from 3.17 1. 290.397). the number of amalgams polished each week.57.249. Adverse health effects of this exposure including subtle neurological effects have also been well documented that affect most dentists and dental assistants. which has banned use of mercury in fillings.6ug/L. Another group of dental studentshad similar results(362).249. with levels in pituitary gland and thyroid over 10 times controls and levels in renal cortex 7 times controls(99.2 ug/L (124.172.25c). Mercury excretion levels were found to have a positive correlation with the number of amalgams placed or replaced per week. urine (25d.000 ppb.397). p287-288. 3%. A review of several studies of mercury level in hair or nails of dentists and dental workers found median levels were 50 to 300% more than those of controls(38.with measurable effects among those in the lowest levels of exposure.69.68).172.8 q/L (124. each filling was found to increase mercury in the urine approx. The average urine level increased by 500% during the course(63).70. T helper/ inducer(CD4+CDS-).l56.363.6 nmol Hg/nmoI(l 1. 10% of dentists had urine mercury levels over 10.290.34 to 9.

Use of such measures along with a Clean-Upm aspirator tip was found to reduce exposure to patient and staff approximately 90%(397). Use of water spray. 0. but care should be taken regarding challenge tests as the high levels of mercury released can cause serious health effects in some.and mercury damage neurological effects.2 ug/M3 (217) (giving approx. The average levels in offices with reasonable controls ranged from 1. and residual levels in equipment sterilizers often exceed this level(454). Coproporphyrin levels have a higher correlation with symptoms and body mercury levels as tested by challenge test(69.70.69. 2.S.247).1b).395. Many surveys have been made of office exposure levels( I .124. but even in Sweden which has had more office environmental controls than others spot levels of over 150 ug/M3 were found in 8 offrces(l72). Use of high speed drill in removal or replacement has been found to create high volume of mercury vapor and respirable particles. dental offices exceed the OSHA dental office standard of 50 ug/M3.290.395. OSHA surveys find 6-16% of U.70. 4 ug/day exposure).123. Another study found spot readings as high as 200 ug/M3 in offices with few controls that only used saliva extractor( 120).69. Test performance was found to be proportional to exposure/body levels of mercury(68.249). This study was for dental personnel having mercury excretion levels below the 10th percentile of the overall dental population.209). visual memory(68.6. This study used .395c.S.290. as seen in previous discussion.138. neurobehavioral tests of motor speed.253. Such levels are also common among the general population of non. at the dentist’s breathing zone.249.173).303). Some studies note that carpeting and rugs in dental offices should be avoided as it is a major repository of mercury(6.7 to over 300 micrograms per cubic meter(ugIM3) (120.395c. mercury vapour concentrations of ten times the current occupational exposure limit of 25 microg/m3 were recorded after 20 minutes of continuous aspirator operation(219).123.71 b.1 b). mercury vapour emissions increased. etc.395. concentration verbal memory. A build up of amalgam contamination within the internal corrugated tubing of the aspirator was found to be the main source of mercury vapour emissions followed by particulate amalgam trapped within the vacuummotor. especially those who still have amalgam fillings or high accumulations of mercury. Amalgam dust generated by high speed drilling is absorbed rapidly into the blood through the lungs and major organs such as the heart receive a high dose within minutes(2 19a. The average dental office exposure affects the body mercury level at least as much as the workers on fillings( to 3.503) For offrice’s using an aspirator. similar to U.173. In addition to these measures researchers also advise all dental staff should wear face masks and patients be supplied with outside air( 120.290.) The level of mercury at breathing point in offices measured ranged form 0. and visuomotor coordination(69.l88. guidelines for chronic mercury exposure.70. with coproporphyrin significantly higher in those with higher mercury exposure and urine levels(70. This produces high levels of exposure to patient and dental staff.7.153).64.260). high velocity evacuationand rubber dam reduce exposure to patient and dentai staff significantly.7.S.S.3O3). ATSDR mercury vapor exposure MRL for chronic exposure is much lower. with several studies finding levels approximately the same as having 19 amalgam fillings( 123. and emotional/mood tests(70:249. and dental masks to only filter out about 40 % of such particles (2 19. Thus most offrce mercury levels were found to far exceed the U. Screening test that are less burdensome and less expensive are now available as first morning void urine samples have been found to be highly correlations to 24 hour urine test for mercury level or porphyrins(73). The U. It was found that the bacterial air exhaust filter (designed to clean the contaminated waste air entering the surgery) offered no protection to mercury vapour. As the vacuum motor heated up with run time.10. Dentists were found to score significantly worse than a comparable control group on personnel with several fillings.290.2 1d. EPA and Health Canada guidelines(2. visual scanning.1b).6 ug/M3. Significant adverse neurobehavioral effects were found even for dental personnel receiving low exposurelevels(lessthan 4 ug/l Hg in urine)(290).395.249.503c).171.1 b).

have from dentists been documented to suffer mercury Many poisoning(6f.490.369.246.395c. Thirty percent of dentists with more than average exposure were found to have neuropathies and visuographic dysfunction(395).74. and motor function correlated more strongly with post-chelation mercury levels. 4.248. memory(vocabulary. chronic muscular pain. Dental workers and other workers exposed to mercury vapor were found to have a shortening of visual evoked potential latency and a decreasein amplitude. Mood scores including anger were found to correlate more strongly with pre chelation urine mercury levels. with magnitudes correlated with urine excretion levels( 190).193).word). etc.) Chelators like DMPS have been found after a fast to release mercury from cells in tissue to be available for excretion. Similar cases among those with other occupational exposure have been seen. Mercury exposure has been found to often cause disability in dental workers(230b. and another with Parkinson’s disease recovered after reduction of exposure and chelation(248). The most common problems were related to the central nervous system. And the plotted test results gave no indication of there existing a threshold below effects were not measurable. Both dental hygienists and patients get high doses of mercury vapor when dental hygienists polish or use ultrasonic scalers on amalgam surfaces(240. 50% reported significant irritability. In a group of dentists and dental workers suffering from extreme fatigue and tested by the immune test MELISA.S. and urine levels after chelation with a chemical. DMPS.lack of ability to concentrate.369). there were clear demonstrated differences in test scores involving memory.while another study found selective atrophy of muscle fibre in women dental workers(490b). In a study in Brazi1(492). In one study of dentists and dental assistants.503c).etc.71.193). Pregnant women or pregnant hygienist especially should avoid these practices during pregnancy or while nursing since maternal mercury . Swedish male dentists were found to have an elevated standardized mortality ratio compared to other male academic groups(284).377. and indications of mild to moderate mercury poisoning in 62% of workers. motor effects. Tests of controls did not find such immune reactions common. dentists and dental assistants with chronic exposure to mercury vapor and anestheticsfound increased health problems compared to controls. and 45% headaches(490a). immune reactivity. and neurological diseases(99.1 b). indicating high body burden of mercury compared to controls(491). This method was found to give enhanced precision and power to the results of the tests and correlations. concentration.395. mood. muscle pains. Dentists were also found to have a high incidence of radicular muscular neuralgia and peripheral sensory degradation( 190. 46% arthritic pains. and motor function compared to those with lower exposure levels. tremors. One of the common effects of chronic mercury exposure is chronic fatigue due to immune system overload and activation. Many studies have found this occurs frequently in dentists and dental staff along with other related symptoms.(249. kidney.378. while toxicity symptoms. mood. burnout. Another study using DMPS challenge test found over 20 times higher mercury excretion in dentists than in controls. 62% of dental workers had urine mercury levels over 10 mg/L. Other studies reviewed found increased rates of brain cancer and aIlergies(99. stomach problems. A survey of over 60.000 U.72.193.490). One dentist with severe symptoms similar to ALS improved after treatment for mercury poisoning(246). including significantly higher liver.400.503.a new methodology which used standard urine mercury levels as a measure of recent exposure. etc. 50% had autoimmune reaction to inorganic mercury and immune reactions to other metals used in dentistry were also common(369). to measure body burden mercury levels.247.504a. other than the documented neurological effects such as chronic fatigue. In another study nearly 50 % of dental staff in a group tested had positive autoimmune ANA titers compared to less than 1 % of the general population(35). Even at the low levels of exposure of the subjects of this study. and motor skills related to the level of exposure pre and post chelation(290). Those with higher levels of mercury had deficits in both memory.

mood. A study of dentist and dental assistantsin the Netherlands found 50% higher ratesof spontaneous abortions.1 88.123.10. Effects are directly related to length of time on the job(277).248.493. Most studies find dentists have increased levels of irritability and tension( l.142.exposure has been shown to affect the fetus and to be related to birth defects. Female dental technicians who work with amalgam tend to have increased menstrual disturbances (275. high rates of drug dependancy and disability due to psychological problems(l5. Body burden increases with time and older dentists have median mercury urine levels about 4 times those of controls. From the medical register of births since 1967 in Norway.490.37.40 1. 5.173. Face masks worn by dental workers filter out only about 40% of small dislodged amalgam particles from drilling or polishing.156. Several dental assistants have been diagnosed with mercury toxicity and some have died of related health effects(32.1b).compared to controls.3 1.34. memory. 6.l72. An epidemiological survey conducted in Lithuania on women working in dental offices(where Hg concentrations were < 80 ug/M3) had increased incidence of spontaneous abortions and breast pathologies that were directly related to the length of time on the job(277a).124a). stillbirths.369. and very little mercury vapor(247).l b). A study in Poland also found a significant positive association between mercury levels and occurrence of reproductive failures and menstrual cycle disorders. The level of mercury excreted in urine is significantly higher for female dental assistantsthan dentists due to biological factors (17 l. survey also found higher spontaneousabortion rate among dental assistantsand wives of dentists( 193). and another study found an increased risk of spontaneous abortions and other pregnancy complications among women working in dental surgeries(277b).99).S. and higher suicide rates than the general white population (284.38.395). it can be seen that dental nurse/assistants have a clearly increased risk of having a deformed child or spontaneous abortion(433).38.38.433)) . and which behavioral problems.222. and congenital defects than for the control group(394).24.61 . as well as higher brain and body burdens( etc.31. and contact urticaria(247. atopic dermatitis. but one study found rates in same range as doctors. and a female dentist recovered from Parkinson’s after mercury detox(248). Dental staff have been found to have significantly higher prevalence of eye problems.279. A chronically ill dental nurse diagnosedwith mercury sensitivity recovered after replacement of fillings and changing jobs(60).504b).110). and concluded dental work to be an occupational hazard with respect to reproductive processes(401).290) Some older dentists have mercury levels in some parts of the brain as much as 80 times higher than normal levels( significantly reduced fertility and lowered probability of conception (10.19.68-74. visiomotor.3 I c. musculoskeletal.348) dental hygienist are advised not to polish dental amalgams when cleaning teeth.50). and their children have significantly lower average IQ compared to the general population (1.249. and poor performance on memory tests(68.74).290. with unusually high occurrence of spina bifida.( 10. A study in Poland found a much higher incidence of birth defects among female dentist and dental assistants than norrnal(l0). Some studies . which often contain higher mercury levels than in the mother’s blood (20. increased spontaneous abortions (lo.70.23. increase with years of exposure (1.247. SIDS.287). Amalgam has been shown to be the main source of mercury in most infants and breast milk. l).I 0. Dentists and dental personnel experience significantly higher levels of neurological.38.38.6873.247.146.433). Populations with only slightly increased levels of mercury in hair had decreases in academic ability(3).99).34. Even dental personnel with relatively low exposure(urine Hg<4 ug/l) were found to have significant neurological ef’fects(290) and was found to be correlated with body burden of mercury. 69. A large U.246.249. Female dentists have increased rates of spontaneous abortion and perinatal mortality (193. conjunctivitis.88. I 10. Because of high documented exposure levels when amalgam fillings are brushed( 182.38).

Scientists and Government Panels or Bodies That Have Found Amalgam Fillings to be Unsafe. New Zealand. The Legislature of the State of California passed a law.Univ.38. Both countries have indicated plans to ban or phase out use of amalgam.S. France. The U..94. Most major countries other than the U. Many homes of dentists have been found to have high levels of mercury contamination used by dentists bringing mercury home on shoes and clothes( 188). 2. of Health in Germany issued an advisory warning against use of dental amalgam in pregnant women(61). Caulk Inc. Switzerland. Many of those researching amalgam related health effects including several very prominent scientists have concluded that the health effects are widespread and serious so that mercury should not be used as a filling material (1. Of North Texas.153.Of Psychology. mood. 1.209. A Canadian Government study for Health Canada concluded that any person with any number of amalgam fillings receives exposure beyond that recommended by the USPHS Standard(209). 7. have similar or more extensive bans or health warnings regarding the use of amalgam. Sweden.208. to the State 4.99. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Biocompatability.20. A study of dental personnel having very low levels of mercury excretion found measurable neurological effects including memory.S. Dept.435). Most European countries require controls on dental waste amalgam emissions to sewers or air. The Chairman of the panel.238. The director of the U. The use of mercury amalgams has been banned for children and women of child-bearing age or put on a schedulefor phase out by several European countries.222. 183.282). NationalCenterfor . advisesthat amalgam should not be used as a base for crowns or for retrograde root fillings as is commonly done in some countries(387).19. Austria.283). 36. cardiovascular. and CNS system cancers among dental workers( 14.143. A Swedish medical panel unanimously recommended to the government “discontinuing the use of amalgam as a dental material”(282). etc.88. Federal program overseeing dental safety advises against using mercury amalgam for new fillings.435) A Swedish National Mercury Amalgam Review Panel and a similar Norwegian panel found that “from a toxicological point of view.1999.236..208).( 164.61. hormonal. “IntegratedRisk InformationSystem.p 133-I45.S. Lars Friberg stated that “dental amalgam is not safe for everyone to use(208238). Other studies have found measurable effects to the immune.34. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA). brain. A World Health Organization Scientific Panel concluded that there is no safe level of mercury exposure( 183. The use of amalgam is declining in Europe and Germany’s largest producer of amalgam has ceased production. Great Britain. and motor function related to mercury exposure level as measured by excretion levels(290).S. including Canada. mercury is too toxic to use as a filling material”(l64. IX. Japan. REFERENCES (1) Denton S(MD) & ButlerJ. EPA found that removed amalgam fillings are hazardous and must be sealed airtight and exposed of as hazardous waste(214).99.164.Life SciencesPress. (2)U. kidney. In 1987 the Federal Dept.170.have found increased risk of lung.Ott 1990.210. that requires all dentists in the state to discuss the safety of dental materials with all patients and to post the following warning about use of amalgam on the wall of their office: “This office usesamalgam filling materials which contain and expose you to a chemical known of California to cause birth defects and other reproductive harm”. Norway.1 15. Australia.60. 227.57. Proposition 65. and found no threshold level below which effects were not measurable.18. and reproductive systems from common levels of exposure(Section IV).148. 3. Studies have found significant measurable adverse health effects at levels far below current government regulatory levels for mercury(290).212.189. A major amalgam manufacturer.

& (f) Gerhard I.J Environ Sci Health B 1997 May. Hum Reprod Update 1998 May. Nov 1979. Jan 1997. Oguraet al.redhe@telia. J Abnormal Child Psycho].198l. Button. “Migraines. & (b)AItmann L. Seizures. EPA-823-F-00-20. ~617. Jones et al.epa. & G. sixth] (9)9)(a) Dr. 13(2):185-98. 1998. NY S Dental Journal. 1985. & Stohs SJ. Miller et a1. (12) Dimaval Scientific monograph. Cincinnati. Runnebaum B “Impact of heavy metals on hormonal and immunological factors in women with repeated miscarriages”.W. Immunol. & (c) Gerhard I. & Moon C et al. “Main and interactive effects of metallic toxins on classroom behavior”. Hey1 Corporation.(Gordon .. Gynecological Clinic. & (c)“Hormonal conditions affecting women caused by environmental poisons” in Pravention. 1997. ~457-458. Clinical Chemistry and Chemical Toxicity of Metals. “Subclinical neurotoxicity of mercury vapor revealed by a multimodality potential study of chloralkali workers”.gov/ostifish/advisories/general.a Mercury Hazard)& (several survey studies comparing level of mercury in hair of dental staff vs controls). Journal of Learning Disabilities. 71(1):95-l 05. 1984. (6) T. 20( 1):9-17. 1985. & Gordon HP.F.).l996. J Can. “Activity of Gpx and SOD in workers occupationally exposed to mercury”. Waldbrenner P. & J.204-6.Can. “Survey of Mercury vapor in dental o&es in Atlantic Canada”.. (7) L. 54(8):593-611.“Effects of Mercury on Spermatogenisis”. “Mercury vapor related to manipulation of amalgam surfaces” . Of Clinical Physics and Bio-Engineering. J Pharmacol Exp Thera 1975. 1983.Olle Redhe . Wissenschaftliche Produktmonographie. Workshop: Biocompatibility of metals in dentistry. Diagnosis of heavy metal loading by the oral DMPS and chewing gum tests.171. Brain Res Rev. Future Medicine Publishing.198 1 ..Schulein et al.I. 199. J. Reduction in mercury vapor levels in Seattle dental offices.S. & A. “Mercuric chloride-induced reactive oxygen species and its effect on antioxidant enzymes in different regions of rat brain”. Mercury Update: Impact on Fish Advisories-Fact Sheet. ‘Neurodegenerative disorders in humans and role of glutathione in oxidative stress mediated neuronal death”. 5 l(2): 156-l 58.htm. & G. Dr Johann Ruprecht. Waibel S. Waldbrenner A. Dr. 1980.Skuba.Environmental Assessment.H. Virginia Dental J.32(3):395-409. Runnebaum B. (5) D. “Subclinical effects of exposure to inorganic mercury revealed by somatosensory-evoked potentials. Thuro H. Ohio. Science. JADA and to floor 103(9):402-407. 70( 1):35-36 1984.Tan et al. 1977. http://www. JADA Sept 1984. & R. EPA. “Hair element content in Learning Disabled Children”.57(2):19-2 1. Johann Dimaval (DMPS).340(2-3):175-82.1983. J of Toxicology and Environmental Health. Vol 198. Assoc. 1985. Bagchi D. Eur Neural.Yeh CY.O. Oxidative mechanisms in the . J Neurochem. 1993. 8(1):23-27. http://www.Oper. 1983. 1998. & Gowdy JM et al. Office of Water. Erfahrungsheilkunde. November 2000. Runnebaum B “Heavy Metals and Fertility”. Monga B. & Pihl RO et al. “Oxidative stress induces programmed cell death in neuronal cells”. E.Roller.42(3): 100-l 06. “Mercury as Occupational Hazard in Dentistry”. page 119 Ruprecht. Ott.Battistone et & S. & D. Texas Dent.4(3):301-309. “Whole blood mercury in mental hospital patients”.24:237-243. p5 l-68. (I I) Lamm 0 et al. [olle.epa. (13)SHussain et al. & P. & 0 Chang YC. & United States Environmental Advisories: Protection Agency.181.. Heidelberg. J. IOO(I): 6-9. Sick From Amalaam R-Dental Ab. 1984. al. Sept 24.S.219:205-8. & (b) Dr. “A comparison of chromosome aberrations and micronucleus techniques for the assessmentof the genotoxicity of mercury compounds in human blood lymphocytes. & Recommendations in dental mercury hygine.57A:347. Mercury poisoning. 1993. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1998. & Proceedings of Intl Conference on Mercury Hazards in Dental Practice. 71 Suppl:S37-9. & (b)Gerhard I. Office of Water. & U.“Mercury in dental offices” J Can Dent Assoc. Roydhouse et al. 1978.1981.epa. Bains et al. “Survey for Mercury vapor in Manitoba dental offices”.W. Diagnose und Therapie von Umwelterkrankungen.M.25(3):335-58.html (3) Marlowe M et al. 1977. ADA News.Chop et al. JD Kruse-Jarres(Ed. and Mercury Toxicity”.Iowa Dent. http://www.1983. 12:37. Wang JD. “Mercury Contamination in the Dental Offtce: A Review”. 1997. Sweden(lOO cases). Cordon LD. 50(7):5 17-522. (10) Editorial.Klinghardt(MD). Visual evoked potentials in 6 year old children in relation to mercury and lead levels. Assoc. Mutat Res 1996 Jun.117(3):482-8.Gerhard. Nov 2 1. Sept. & Mercury in the OfIice. Sveinsson K. & H. & RT McNemey et Tubingen Univ. J California Dental Assoc. Dent.Pregnancy in Female Dentists. (8) Redhe. Klinisches Labor 1992. S-79133 Falun. J Dent Res Abstract 1092.“Survey of Des Moines area dental offices for Mercury vapor”. Am J Psychiatry. April. 4906:378-395. The National Listing of Fish and Wildlife Summary of 1999 Data. l35( I): 115-7. JADA. 194(1). 1985. & National lnst of Dental Research. “Ganzheitiche Diagnostik un Therapie bie Infertilitat”.Bulat.“Mercury vapor in the dental of&e-does carpeting make a difference?“. Dept.html . & (d) Gerhard I.Kantor et al. Dent. 1984. J. Arch Occup Environ Health.38:4044 11. & R. “Main and interactive Effect of Metallic Pollutants on Cognitive Functioning”. (4) Lee IP.Part A. Daniel V. Frejavagen 33. Dent.“Repot-ton Independent survey taken of Austin dental offices for mercury contamination”. 1998.C. Glasgow Scot.

Lorscheider.139:209-212..“Toxic effects of metals%: Caserett and Doull’s Toxicolow. 1981. J Dent Res. Peterson LC. Dept of Zoophysiology. McGrawHill Inc. Westberg G. (15) Svare CW et. Zahnarztl Z 39(9):199-205. Sallsten G. (a)Magnus Nylander.MolneJ. Swed Dent J 1987. Akesson A. 1987.Vimy.D..Y. Univ.D. Am. Boyer DB.Cu. Toxicology-Symptoms-Treatment.J. &(b) Goodman. “The effects of dental amalgam restorations on Blood Mercury levels”.& (c)Barregard L. 1992.F. Conference on Trace Elements in Health and Disease. Dent. 1990 & Amer. & F. intraoral corrosion resulting from coupling dental implants and restorative metallic systems. The Tagum study I: analysis and clinical correlates of mercury in maternal and cord blood.W. Cruz MC. Stockholm May .. J. Allan Butterfield D. Environ Res 2000 Oct. 30):RlOlO-R1014. J. Schutz A. et al. J. Svare CW. al. Bjors U. & Snapp KR. Blohm. Boyd.toxicity of metal ions. “Mercury burden due to amalgam fillings” Dtsch. J Orthomol Med (1996) vl 1. 3rd Edition. 1982.Hahn et al. J.84(2): 186-94.Lorscheider.Lorscheider et al. Lind B.J. Quantitative analysis of Hg.L. 1977.Takahashi. Obstet and Gyneco1. Safety and Review Board of North Carolina. Mac Millan Publishing Company.Goyer. 1984.Physiol. www. Pediatrics 2000 Oct. 107( 11):867871. “Cadmium.Eggleston et al. & Prosth Dent 1987. n. Haglind P.C.ibiblio. Geneva. Springfield.Vimy. Neurochem Int (14) 2001 Aug.B. 2(3): 194-20 1. 1g(2): 321-36. ICBM 1988. Svalander C.J. Riedel et al. Lauderback CM. Orthomolecular Psychiatry 1983.Hansson. M. 143(4): 440443.Sn .Proceedings. Correlation of dental amalgam with mercury in brain tissue. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. (20) M. & (b) Jackson GH.FL Maternal -Fetal Distribution of Mercury Released From Dental Amalgam Fillings. Bull Env Contam Toxic01 34 1985 459 (16) K. FASEB J. Berglund M.Kuntz “Maternal and chord blood mercury background levels. Distribution of mercury released from amalgam fillings into monkey tissues”. 1985. 1990.“hnra oral Mercury released from dental amalgams and estimation of daily dose” J. Poisoning. 63( 1):7 l-73. N. M.64(S): 1072-5. Free Radic Biol Med 1995. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. & Wang Chen CP and Greener EH... Dent. (22) P.Abraham.” Mercury horn dental Canada.87-94 (17) J. “Evaluation of the safety issue of mercury releasefrom amalgam fillings”. Dept of Medicine and Medical Physiology . Gillman. & M. Attman PO.58(6). Ott et.Kuhnert et al. Calgary Alberta N. Drew. Glutathione elevation and its protective role in acrolein-induced protein damage in synaptosomal membranes: relevance to brain lipid peroxidation in neurodegenerative disease. Am. faculty of Medicine. & Holland RI. meconium. Cardin AL. “Mercury vapor in the oral cavity in relation to number of amalgam surfaces and the classic symptoms of chronic mercury poisoning”.Svare. Thomas-Publisher. Measurement of galvanic current and electrical potential in extracted human teeth”. Univ.1991. “Amalgam hazards in your teeth”. and infants’hair. II 1986. Dent Res.L. 7:1432-33.Zn and trace elements in amalgam removed from an abutmenttooth underneath a gold alloy bridge that had been in vivo for nine plus years. “Mercury in human breath from dental amalgams”. & Pocemich CB.2. 198 1.Dt. 65( 12): I44 1. “Mercurv Concentrations in the human brain and kidnevs in relation to exposure 6om dental amalgam fillings”. N. Charles C. & Vahter M. et al. Res. Ostrea E. 11:179-l 87. “Longitudinal study of methyl mercury and inorganic mercury in blood and urine of pregnant and lactating women.A.J. J Prosthet Dent.Nylander et al. “ the mercury concentration in humans from amalgam fillings”. “The contribution of dental amalgam to mercury in blood”. 1980. Longitudinal surveillance”. Racine CL.167 I . & Res. Mercury. (24) J. Galvanic currents between gold and amalgam.1444.Z. Pagulayan 0. “Comparison of mercury levels in maternal blood fetal cord blood and placental tissue”.68(5):780-5 (18) M. 4:23-7. 1984.Y. International Labour Office. JADAl 11(11):779-780. 261 (Regulatory lntegrative Comp Physiol. Brodsky. 1985..TheBasic Science of Poisons.88:269-72.&(d) Arena. Physiol.. (23) W. & Lichtenberg H. of Iowa. & “Silver tooth fillings impairs sheep kidney function”. J Dent Res 1989 May. & (d) D.. Dalisay C.704-7. et al. of Calgary. Sweden. Fifth Edition. 1993. & Lemons JE et al. 1985.Res. & b)Momoi Y. & Patterson JE. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation.64(S): 1069-I 075. 58:704-707. 1993.. A galvanic study of different amalgams. & Ramirez GB. 60(9): 1668. “The effects of dental amalgam on Mercury levels in expired air” J.. &(c) Encyclopedia of Occumpational Health and Safety. breast milk. 1992. University of Lund. and Lead in Kidney Cortex of the General Swedish Population: A Study of Biopsies from Living Kidney Donors”. Stand J Dent Res.Y. “Mercury concentrations in the human brain and kidneys and exposure from amalgam fillings”. l(2): 107112. FASEB J.Zahnarztl. Environ Health Perspect 1999 Nov.Ag. Vol 2. &(b) Schupp.4:5536 (21) R. 47:490-496.l990.lO6(4):774-81.& L.Vimy. 0rganen.39(2):141-9. 258:R939-945. Nylander. “Occupational exposure to Mercury in dentistry and pregnancy outcome”.org/amalgam/ (I 9) Matts Hanson. Schutz A. as well as in umbilical cord blood”.al. Implant Dent. 1985 (25) C.Malmstrdm..

A. J. 1969. 105: 338-43.l 1:399-405. Williams and Wilkins. & (b)P. 1999. 1998. Vol 122. 5 l(3): 3 18-20. “Silver amalgam: an unstable material”. Baltimore. Sulphation deficit in “low-functioning” autistic children. 1992. Epidemiology in Occupational Health.25(2): 207-2 1O. “Amalgam derived mercury in feces”. Waring RI-I. Anttila et al.. p668-. & NeuroloW for Barefoot Doctors. Toxic01 Appl Pharmacol. Odontal Revy. & Mareck and Hockman. “Simulated crevice corrosion experiment for ph and solution chemistry determinations”. 1961. & 1 Mandel. Assoc Dean for Research.bioprobe. 1976 . Dentinal and pulpal uptake of mercury from lined and unlined amalgam restorations. 111 (l-3):43-65. (28) F. Missed diagoses and misdiagnoses of environmental toxicant exposure. et al.Inc. & Trott and Sherkat. Of Occupational Health. “Mercury in gingival tissues adjacent to amalgam fillings”. Final Report. “Increased Prevalence of poor sulphuoxidation in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis”. 3rd Ed. Danscher G. from Dental amalgam-A Hazard to the Human Brains. 1994. 140: 543-546. 1973. 1974:23. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1998. 30:766-770.1130-1134. 1989 Apr. (22 patients) (27) Matts Hanson. & Sheppard AR and EisenbudM. School of Dental and Oral Surgery. Co.207-2 10.2 I (3):659& Merritt’s Textbook of Neurology.(p753) Haddad. 1999. FASEB J 9:504-508. Hampton Roads Publishing Company Inc. & Goldschmidt et al. Its All in Your Head. (34) PatrickSt&tebecker. JADA Vol 115 December 1987. & Q Markovich et al. Bioprobe. Hogstedt P. 73:33-43.& H Reden. Moszczynski-P Jr. Aug 1991. Uniformed Consent: the hidden dangers in dental care.TE. 127:533555.hugnet.. JADA. and Winchester.Malmstrom. “Heavy metals (Hg. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment. 1993 & C.197 1.. “Mercury Release from Amalgam Fillings and Oral Dysbacteriosis as a Cause of Resorption Phenomena” Zahnarztl Welt/Reform(ZWR). 1992. & (d)S.S. Jan. & Ortendahl T W.Fusayama et al. Journal of Trace Nylander et al. 42(4): 233-8 1989. (33) S. Comp Biochem Physiol Pharmocol Toxic01 Endocrinol. New York university press. & T. (30) T. 55:l l-15.154(2): 18 l-7. Philadelphia.Till et al. 1996. W. J. 114(2):89-98.Toxicology. & U.bioprobe. Columbia Univ. “Xenobiotic metabolism and adverse environmental response: sulfurdependent detox pathways”. MCS. & (e)Alberti A. J Orthomolecular Med.. 1CBM conference Colorado Springs. N. British Dent Journal. & S. Dentistry.L. & H. J Dental Res. Ann Rheum Dis. Saunders and Company. & SanchesSotres et al. 25. “Mercury in urine of employees exposed to magnetic fields”. (32) T.C. Management of Poisoning. & Zander JADA.46(3):420-4. 29:73-81. 5. J CDA 37:255-256.Freden et al.. 1972. 1988: & J Canadian Dental Assoc.867 Donated by The ADA. Olsson et al. Stortebecker Foundation for Research. Holland RP. Eur J Oral Sci 1997. “SO2: a potent glutathione depleting agent”. 11:108-l 15. “Mercury vapor release from dental amalgam in vitro caused by magnetic fields generated by CRTs”. (Abs 122).Zamm. EOA-600/8-84f. EPA. Stockholm Mercurv Poisoning. Odontal Revy. 1984. 1964. http://www. Emory et al. Langley-Evans et al.Fan. Fourth international symposium Elements in Experimental Medicine. Finnish Inst. “Fatal mercury intoxication in a dental surgery assistant”. Biological Effects of electric and magnetic fields of extremely low frequency. Swed Dent J 1991 p 3 1 Abstract 22 (29) Fisher et al.1000-1006.Cd) inhibit the activity of the liver and kidney sulfate transporter Sat-l”. 33(6): 300(35) Huggins Prosth Dent 11:522-532. Corrosion. 1977. Swedish paper translated in Bio-Probe Newsletter. “Mercury exposure from silver tooth fillings: emerging evidence questions a paradigm”. Proceedings. Vol 9( 1):5-6. Prosth. Res. 1999. 1963. Shannon. http://www. & Turgeon et al. & Hartman DE. Roman0 C. 1997. J Oral Rehab. 42: 1183-l 197. Pirrone P.A. 9th Ed. 1984. MaImstrom et al. J. Como ltaly Sept 1985 (26) A. & App .” Why is Mercury toxic ?: Basic chemical and biochemical properties of Mercury/amalgam in relation to biological effects”. Chronic Mercury Toxicity. Elia M. ISBN: O-94 1011001-1 & Dental Caries as a Cause of Nervous Disorders.Associate Professor of Neurology. & Horsted-Binslev P. 117(2): 199-202.. Biol Psychiatry 1999. J CDA. 1974.. & Hal Huggins. Periodo. Karolinska Institute.5(53):138-142. 1997. 1978:87.New Hope Against an Endemic Disease.Y. (3 1) Langan. & Center for Progressive Medicine. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. Mercury Health Effects.I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I I I (36) Sam Queen.. 1990. 1995.E. & Health damage due to exposure to mercury vapor (Mercury) Szkody zdrowotne wywolane narazeniem na pary rteci (Mercury). “Removal of dental mercury: often an effective treatment for very sensitive patients”. “Release of elements due to electrochemical corrosion of dental amalgam” J of Dental Research.1988.Schmidt et al.Lorscheider et al. & F. The use of Mercury in dentistry: a critical review of the literature.. Perio. McFadden.F.B. & Clinical 70.POLISH. Levy. “Effects of paternal occupation exposure to lead or mercury . (37) A. & Trivedi and Talim. Moszczynski-P Czas-Stomatol. & C.http://www. Update Health Issue Assessment.1995. 1969.

Prenatal mercury exposure raises blood pressure. (50) Allan W. & “Belastungen durch toxische Schwermetalle”. 1996. W. 5(3): 236-40. Teratogenic and genetic effects of Mercury toxicity. J Pharmacobiodyn. 1994.. (47) A. 150(3):301-5: & Z. Toxic01 Lett. & D. Screening. 1999. p284285. Russian Academy of Sciences. The mediation of mutagenicity and clastogenicity of heavy metals by physiochemical factors.B. 19(8):487-92. Biomed Environ Sci 1992.Saunders Co. Am J Epidemiol. Amalgamtherape.1984. 1995. 8(3): 62-68. 1998.Annau et al.69( I):7 1-4. Homoopathische Z. “Mechanisms of neurotoxicity and their relationships to behavioral changes”. J. (42) Babich et al . J Biol Buccale. 1993.. 8: 293-304. Deplan F.. & K. Sonnenfeld NL.(total:over 1200 cases) (41) Khera et al. Panta 3. Nilner et al. (49) A.25(3):361-83.253-286. In vitro testing of dental materials by means of macrophage cultures.Inouye et al. “CNS arylsulfatases inhibited by methyl mercury”. & T. 1994. 194 1. Pb2+ and Hg2+ binding to alpha-lactalbumin”. Kubicka et al. Klann E.Perger.“. 10:370-375. (46) Veron et al. & “Amalgamtherapie fur Arzte und Zahnarzte”. The Effect of Mercuric Chloride on .S. Journal of Medical .& Homoopathische Behandlung de Amalgamvergiftung & “Polemik und Wirklichkeit”.49(2):139-47. Dtsche Zahnarztliche Zeit. 1985: 157. 253. & “Schnupfen-Was tun?“. & Natura Med 1992. “HgCl2-induced IL-4 gene expression in T cells involves a protein kinase C-dependent calcium influx through L-type calcium channels”.B. p3 l-34. 1990.l985:460-465.Ziff. (40) F. 1995. & Ghosh N. & “Amalgamvergiflung_moglicher”Der Naturazt. 1980. 8~ Teratology... 37:7687. 1995. & Schoonover IC.Kawada et al. Sonntag-Verlag. & Goldman. Med Hypotheses. 1984:3.. Hemon D. (45) L. &Erfahrungsheikunde.Kingman et al.“Corrosion studies of dental gold alloy in contact with amalgam”.. J 68: 135-139. “MeHg and neurotoxicity in children”. (41 cases). “Autoimmune disease induced by mercuric chloride”.Vanay et al. 1996.1970..Ziff and M. ISBN: o-94101 l-03-8. (48) & Skinner. et al. Corrosion of dental alloys. Jan 1996. 2000. & Sorensen N.Rajanna et al. Therapeutikon.Biochem Mol Biol Int 1996 Aug. “Amalgam Dentaires et Allergies”.Caron et al. “Lymphocyte transformation induced . “Effects of inorganic and methyl mercury on thyroidal function”. JADA. Electron microscopic Xray microanalysis of metals deposited in oral mucosa. in KomDendiu der Reeulationspatholocie und Therapie. Buchner et al. 1993. & M.Arvidson. “Lazer Light Scattering Study of the Toxic Effects of Methyl mercury on sperm motility”.Hansen et al A survey of metal induced mutagenicity in vitro and in vivo. 22:3-9. 1985:37. J Immun. 77(3):461-7 1. “Amalgam tattoo of the oral mucosa: a clinicopatholigic study of 268 cases”. (38) S. 22 l-226. & Savitz DA. Environ Res.O. Br J Ind Med 1991 Jun. J of Occup & Environ Med. 106( 1):582-7. Olshan AF. Forsell et al. Dent. J Androl.& M.. & S. Dent Res.227-232. & B. military population”.D. Johns Hopkins Univ.(MD).39(6): 1255-65 (44) L.87(2): 157-63. Thyrotoxicity of cadmium and mercury.Veprintsev.‘% -viva self reactivity of mononuclear cells to T cells and macrophages exposed to Hg CI2” Eur. Mercury content in amalgam tattoos of human oral mucosa and its relation to local tissue reactions.D. 503-l 8.Toxicol Teratol. & G. National Institute of Dental Research. “Autoreactive T cells in mercury induced autoimmune disease”.1987 (39) M. 4th Ed. 184-I 87. Int Arch Allera Immunol. & Mohamed et al. v4 1.Verchaeve et al.& J.Strassburg et al.15.revised. (43) Knapp LT. 8c K. & Cordier S.3 1:65-74 & M. Toxicology. “Homoopathische B$adlrg Allg. “Mercury concentrations in urine and blood associated with amalgam exposure in the U. (4): 25 lder Amalgamvergiftung”.. Superoxide-induced stimulation of protein kinase C via thiol modification and modulation of zinc content. & K. 3(3):149-59.. 8 1(2-3): 197-203: & A. Comparative in vitro cytogenetic studies in Mercury exposed human lymphocytes. Mandereau L.48(6):375-81.49(2): 219-25. J Amer Co11Toxicol .Ed. 1990. Euro J Oral Sci 1998. The Science of Dental Materials.1986. “Modulation of protein kinase C by heavy metals”. 83-l 00 Swartzendruber. J Biol Chem 2000 May 22. 1985:7. Souder W. 1992. Haug-Verlag. Behavioral and neuropathological effects of prenatal methyl mercury exposure in mice”. J Biomed Mater Res 1986. 109( 1): 1 l-20 . Institute for Biological Instrumentation. “Generalized allergic reaction from silver amalgam fillings”. Pharmacol Toxicol. lnfertilitv and Birth Defects: IS Mercury from Dental Fillings a Hidden Cause?. K. & Pelletier et al. .Friese.20(8):1125-38. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol.37(8):9 15-2 1. 1967. Allgemeine Homoopathische zeitschrifi. Paternal exposure to mercury and spontaneous abortions.. 241(5). J Dermatol 1992.1957. 1988. & D. The biochemistry of Mercury in the environment Nriagu. Philadelphia.Badou et al. & PGrandjean et al. Inc.135(8): 13.1979. School of Public Health. Epidemiology 1999.. Am J Ind Med 1994 Mar..239(6): 225-233 . 199 1..H. & J. Amsterdam.28: 1278-91.7( 1): 11-l 5. Swed. Kanzaki et al. J Immunol.l986 137(8):2548-54 8c Stand J of Immunology. Amalgam tattoos: light and microscopy and electron-probe micro-analysis. Harrison et al.I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 8 8 8 8 I 8 :I on spontaneous abortion”.Pelletier et al.381-430. Blackbum. 1980. 1986 : 14.7(4): 295-306. Bio-Probe. Mutation Res. Int Arch Allergy.A.. Elsevier. Review of epidemiologic studies of paternal occupational exposure and spontaneous abortion. Neurobehav.E.

& M.M. & Assoc. App Microbial.Thyroid Function of the Rat.. J Neurochem. & JJ Heales et al. 8(5):991-1000. Dept. 353(9164): 1594. April 29-May 14. & W. Sweden LYMPHOCYTE IMMUNO-STIMULATION ASSAY -MELISA” & VDM Stejskal et al.4(4):206-10. Electrocardiogrphic Changes in Mercury Poisoning. & Livardjani F. mechanisms involving ROS”.Nicole et al. Orstavic.F. Immunological effects of amalgam components: MELISA-a new test for the diagnosis of mercury allergy. 1997.Jenner.Fung et al.K. Base1 1975 . & G. 16: supp 0: 20-4. March 2001.9 1:150-l 52: & Rowland. (57) N. 1996.1999. Franklin. Lung and blood superoxide dismustase activity in mercury vapor exposed rats: effect of N-acetylcysteine treatment. Frustaci et al. 1998. & J.. Term.1994. Niedersachsisches Umwehministerium. “Study of mercury uptake in dental students”. Grauer F. J Neurosci. Leroy M. Ncurobehavioral effects of NAC conjugates of dopamine: possible relevance for Parkinson’sDisease”.V. European Heart J.J of Advancement in Medicine. 7(I) 1994.Peiper et al.Shen et al. 156(2): 113-8. Of Pathology.J.Godfrey. http://www.Forth. 1992.66(3):289-95. 15(4):2857-66. 1983.48: 49-55.. Can J Neurol Sci. Proceedings of the International Symposium Status Quo and Perspectives of Amalgam and other Dental Materials. 11(7):824-37. 192(5): 447-54( 12 cases). & RR. Otzenhausen. Biomed Pharmacother. Niv Y. Chem Res Toxicol.(80 cases). President of the Austrian Oncology Society. J Appl Toxicol. “Trace elements linked to cardiomyopathy”. Chemosphere 1998 Aug.E. Ilblack et al. 1996. 786:2 17-33. “New aspects of murine coxsackie B3 mycocarditis: focus on heavy metals”. Offen et al. “Hong Kong subfertility links to mercury in human hair and fish”. (65) Y. 1994.22( 1):3 l-49. (55) Dickman MD. 1997. April.Campbell & M. MRL Services. Soiefer AL. Lund et al.Effects of mercury on the isolated heart muscle are prevented by DTT and cysteine”.. Dept.Spencer et al. “Marked elevation of myocardial trace elements in Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy”. 1975.2 1(1):35-39. Ameberg. 33(6):1578-83. & Chem Res Toxicol..Dtsch Zahnarzt Z 1989.D. & Husten L.K. Kopp P.Vol 155. “Mercury mobilization by DMPS in subjects with and without amalgams”? Zentralbl Hyg Umwehmed. Dahlet M. “Direct evidence for glutathione as mediator of apoptosis in neuronal cells”. 1998. 14(7): 4385-92. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology. 1996. & (61) E.Ferrari et al. Sci Total Environ. Kopolivic K. Davies “The Methylafon of Mercuric Chloride by Human Intestinal Bacteria”. Amer J of Cardiology.44(9):7 14(64) Steinberg D. & USA Today.l995.. Experientia.3 1(7):428-32.“Methylation of Mercury from dental amalgam and mercuric chloride by oral Streptococci”. Toxicol and Applied Pharm 1979. “Use of thiols in treatment of PD”.Birth Defect News. 1998. Jaeger A.D. Decreased Hg retention with DMSA. 2nd Ed. (63) K.141(1):32-9. 52(9):349-55. 13(Suppl):24-34. “Formation of methyl mercury by bacteria”.“In viva mercury and methyl mercury levels in patients at different intervals after amalgam .3 1: 1064-1065. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. (54) M. Paper presented at the World Congress on Cancer. Dept. & A. 19982 14: 165-74. ~356.melisa. 1995.Scan. Prescription for Nutritional Healing”. Aug. (51) Heintze et al.M. (58) Kostial K et al. (60) V. Kostler. San Francisco. 1996. 1984. (62) W. J Neurosci. 5(4):397-400. 199 1. “Toxikologie von Quecksilberverbindungen”. Valderhaug (52) “Bacteria1 Growth on Dental Restorative Materials in Mucosal Contact”. & Kostyniak PJ. Mov Disord. Orfaly. for Birth Defect Children.198 1. Med Sci. Germany. 1993. “MELISA: tool for the study ofmetal allergy”.Hamdy et al. Columbia Univ. April 1994 Sydney Australia. Neurochem Res. Eur J Pediatr 153:607-6 10. & (c) Stejskal V. 1978. Of America. 71(5):2 I 12-22: & P.G. Hebrew Univ. Exp Neurol.. Res. “Treatment of acute MeHg poisoning by NAC”. I996. J of American College of Cardiology. Lancet 1999. Ledig M. & Science News. Perlyte M. “Cysteine & GSH in PD”. & N. Leung KM. 1994. “Mercury Burden of Human Fetal and Infant Tissues”.Lutz et al. Toxicology 1991 Mar 11. Thornsberry. Grasso. & Dahhan.“Confirmation of Mercury Retention and Toxicity using DMPS provocation” . 13(5):321-5. Acta Odontol. Johns Hopkins Univ. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1999 Apr 15.Stejskal. Balch et al. J Appl Toxicol. & Butterworth RF et al. & Mercury and organochlorine exposure from fish consumption in Hong Kong. Mercury among dental personnel in Israel. Karolinska Institute.“Qxidative mechanisms in PD”. 1999. 1994. Ratan et al. Of Oral Biology. in Quecksilber in der Umwelt-Hearing zur Amalgamprolematik.l995. & D. Proceedings of Infectious Diseases Sot. “Concentrations of mercury in brain and kidney of fetuses and infants”.P. Scand. June 5. Of Clinical Chemistry.10:6 I-67. 1984. & D.Zander et al. Dept. (59) A.39:267-274 (53) C. Vassalo. of Neurology.37(5):991-1015 (56) X. 1998. Sept. & G. 1999. Stockholm. & (b)D. & J. Ca.Drasch et al. 9(7):1117-26. 1964. Ann NY Acad Sci. Dent. Toxicology in Vitro.Owen et al.

J. Schulte et al. (73) Toxicol Eniviron Health. Vol92. IADR Abstract 165. “Mercury in Saliva and Feces after Removal of Amalgam Fillings”. 1976. 92:1189-l 194. (81) 80:103-107. lnt Arch Occup (82) Health 66:209-2 12.Smart et al. 8~ Yoshida S. JADA. 1988. Adv Neural. et al. LSkare et al. Dental Mercury: A Factor that Aggravates and Induces Xenobiotic Intolerance.Veltman et al.Drouet et al. & A case of mercury contamination of a dental suite. restorations”. 1995. Mercury poisoning in dentists. J Sot Occup Med. and Soil pollution. 1995. Archives of Environmental Health 1994. Amalgam allergy associated with exacerbation of aspirin-intolerant asthma. Zamm. 7: 195-206. 1986. 1997. Arch Biochem Biophys.1996.197s. (75) 64(5):472-75.Riedl et al. J Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. “Mercury Concentrations in Children with and without Amalgam Restorations”. Br Dent J 036) .I.“Long-term mercury excretion in urine after removal of amalgam fillings”. 199 1 May-Jun.248(2):467-78. Neurotoxicolgy. ~156-62.C. “Resolution of lichen planus following removal of amalgam restorations”. 80( l-4):59-67. & “An estimation of the uptake of mercury fi-om amalgam fillings in Swedish subjects”.Smith. 1998.” Silver Concentrations in Human Tissues: the Dependence on Dental Amalgam”. Markesbery. L.R.A.Foo et al. 60(2): (71) 267-273. D. Neurotoxicology & Teratology. 1994. E. “Imbalances of trace elements related to oxidative damage in Alzheimer’s’s diseased brain”. J Dent Res 74:420. “Behavior effects of low level mercury exposure among dental professionals”. “Human Exposure to Hg and Ag (83) Released f?om Dental Amalgam Restorations”. UK.20(4):429-39. & A. Univ. “Behavioral Effects of Low Level (70) Exposure to Hg vapor Among Dentists”. 10559-68 & Comet-t et al.1993. Mexico”. Seattle. Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health. and neurobehavioral changes of dental workers in (69) Monterrey. Amayasu H. King’s College. “Anaphylaxis improvement after removal of amalgam fillings”.L.104( 11): 1336-40. “Mass Balance and Systemic Uptake of Mercury Released fi-om Dental Fillings”.Dent Res (76) 73(4): 980 A-334. C. Toxicology and Applied (79) Pharmacology.Weiner et al. vl68. M.South Med J 71:904-5. K. “Allergy to Silver Amalgams”.J Trace (78) Elements in Medicine and Biology. J. J.Dept. J. and Soil (77) Pollution. & Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1976. 1986.“Mental effects of mercury poisoning”. 19:339-345. Neural.1998. Water. & Thompson et al. 1990.Cianciola et al. G. & L. (66) Of Kentucky. Environmental Research. Transm. ~255-265. 70(3) 23-6 “Regional brain trace-element studies in Alzheimer’s’s disease”.Liang et al.Drasch et al. Lincoln.R. “Mercury toxicity in the dental office: a neglected problem”. A. 1990. & (b) J Dent Res 75: 38-. 1997. Sci Tot Environ.Osterblad et al. Of Glasgow. Air. v6#2 ~~67-77 (199 1). Batelle Center for Public Health Research. 9: 1-7. (72) M. A.MThompson&W. 22(3):8 1. 49(5):384-394. 1993. IADR Abstract 160( 1995): & Occup Environ Med. J. 1980.C. & Ehmann et al.n3. 39( 11):2499.Echeverria et al. Science of the Total Environment. “Alterations of heme. Neurotoxicology. ‘:Epidemiologic assessment of measures used to indicate exposure to mercury vapor”. & Symington D. JADA.52( 12): 8 13-7 D Gonzalez-Ramirez et al.Bjorkman et al.9(2):82-7. “Neurobehavioral effects in Occupational Chemical Exposure”. Neurotoxicology (1988 Spring) 9( 1):1-7 & Hock et al.197s. University of Nebraska Medical Center.“Psychomotor testing of dentists with chronic low level mercury (68) exposure”.E.G. Clin Exp Allergy 1999.1995 D. LSkare.J.Dentistry. 17(2): 16 l-i 68( 1995). Vance DE Ehmann WD Markesbery WR In: Biol Trace Elem Res (1990 Jul-Dec)26-27:461-70. “Antimicrobial and Mercury Resistance among Persons with and without Amalgam Fillings”. D. Neurodegenerative Disease Research Center.Begerow et al. 1995. Neurotoxicology. 29(10): 1412-4. Med. SO:27l-86. (74) Neurotoxicology & Teratology. “P450 and hemeoxygenase enzymes in the basal ganglia and their role’s in Parkinson’s disease”. Calsakis et al. Katsunuma et al. Mikami H. (67) A search for longitudinal variations in trace element levels in nails of Alzheimer’s’s disease patients. 1998. Univ. _ Of Chemistry.“The relationship between mercury concentration in human organs and predictor (85) variables”. Al6ed V. cytochrome P-450.1995 L. S. 1999. “Uninary mercury.46:371-5.A. Allerg Immunol(Paris). Nakagawa H. Air. Orthmol. 138( l-3): 10 l-115.C. & M. (80) Antimicrobial Agents and Chem. 1994.Bittner et al. “Increased blood mercury levels in Alzheimer’s’s patients”.1995. Mantyla et al.Oral Surg.Carlson-MP College of Northwest-Dent. “Is mercury a respiratory tract allergen?“. porphyrins.52( 1): 19-33. 144(l). and steroid metabolism by mercury in rat adrenal (84) gland”.G.Ritchie et al. Annals of Allergy. 272( 1): 264-274. “Mercury reactions in the human mouth with dental amalgams” Water.30:37-39.

160: 434-437. 17:37-50. L.F. August 28. 1986. Contact Dermatitis. Br Dent J. . 1972.4: 252- . & H.Mobacken et al. and methyl mercury on gap junctions and [Ca2+]1 in bone cells”. “The relevance of amalgam replacement on (270 cases) oral lichenoid reactions”. “Mercury in the hair of ALS patients”. 134(3):420-3. 1 l(4): 195-203.Seidler et al.24( l-2):4 l-45( 161 cases). & A.. & Tuthill JY. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Med Sci Res 24(5): 355-356. & Ohlson et al.Langworth et al.1995. & R. 13(5):297-304 . 1999. IO:1 l-15.Ostman et (87) al..‘I. Greer M.Berglund. 326 Berglund A. L. & G. M. Am J Clin Nutr 1995. & P.1993. “Mercury. Int J Risk & Safety in Med 1994.4 1(3):422-430. Cutis. and 99(4):320-g. n. “Mercury levels in plasma and urine after removal of all amalgam restorations: the (8% effect of using rubber dams”. A.Camisa et al. Pleva J.Koch et al. Metal exposure from amalgam alters the distribution of trace elements in blood cells and plasma. And GPX before & after amalgam removal”. JAMA. Stand J Dent Res 102(4): 2 16-222. 1990. & K. Ziegler DK. “Chronic ailments related to amalgams”. & Godfiey. & lichenoid lesions.Ibbotson et al. 1995. & 33(6):423-7.3:247.48: 189202. Environmental Risk Factors for Osteoporosis. & amalgam” European J Oral Sci 1996. 1990. 4:229-236. Of Work Environment Health. 95: 305-3 18.Molin et al. 1996. “Oral lesions and symptoms related to metals”.] 991(40 cases).19. Tandon et al. & C. Lindvall A. “People with high mercury uptake from their own dental amalgam fillings”.E. Toxic and essential metal interactions.. & Y . . & M.63(3): 189(91) B. 104(3):320-32 1. “Symptoms before and after proper amalgam removal in relation to serum-globulin reaction to metals”. I 996. & J. 1994. (97) Redhe 0. (119 cases) (96) Goyer RA. Case renorts suanning 150 Years on the adverse effects of dental amalzam. & Adams CR. and (88) Feek. 1983. “Oral lichenoid lesions caused by allergy to mercury in amalgam”. Carlmark B.Freeman et al. & Goyer RA et al. Contact Dermatitis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2001 Feb. “Mercury vapor intoxication”. Occup Envir (93) S.New York State J Med. Vol7. Journal of Dentistry. . 1994. 23 Dee.1998.1990. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine. Intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) treatment of autoimmune kidney disease associated with mercury ( Hg++) toxicity. “A case of high mercury exposure from dental Med 52: 124-128. “Parkinson’s Disease and Occupational Exposure to Mercury”. Contact Dermatitis. 1998. & Nutrition and metal toxicity.Godfrey.Gen Dent.63(2): 134-9. v. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. “Effect of Amalgam restorations on whole body potassium and bone mineral content in older men”. No.Schirrmacher.Barregard et al.1995.Goldberg et al. “Effects of lead. Stand J. (95) J Orthomol Med 8:145-148. The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Molin M. “Mercury intoxication simulating ALS”. “Trace element imbalances in ALS”. Calcif Tissue lnt 1998 Aug. New Zealand Medical Journal. Skoghmd. “Kinetics of mercury in blood and urine after amalgam removal”. Tandlakartidningen 88( IO): 570-572.Mano et al. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem (92) 195( 1): 13. 81(4):459-465. Dent Mater 1997 Sep. J. “A case of unusually high mercury exposure from amalgam fillings”. JADR Abstract 159. 1989. (98) A.H. and Endodontics. “Effect of Replacement of Dental Amalgam on OLR”. Envir Health Perspectives. & McCann et al.E. J Dent Res 74:420. Oral Medicine. “Recovery from ALS and from asthma after removal of dental amalgam fillings”.1995( 12 cases).12. Possible environmental factors for Parkinson’s disease”. 6l(Suppl 3): 6468650s. 1996. 1999. J. & S. 1996. 29(7): 844-848. 1990. selenium. M. Cohn. 1996. 1996. 1995. 1996.Molin et al. 1995. & Lindh U.O. (94) Inc. “Contact hypersensitivity to mercury”. & Khare et al. p.1996.” Regression from orticaria following dental filling removal:.Lindqvist et al. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 30: 1275-1277.1SBN O-94 lOOIl-14-3(245 cured).Bratel et al. & Mano et al.1984. December 1898.39(2): 134-142.. Dental amalgam. 250(5):642-5. HJ “Elimination of symptoms by removal of dental amalgam from mercury poisoned patients”.33(5): S. . “Amalgam related chronic ulceration of oral mucosa”. Stromberg et al. Acta Odontol Stand. Annu Rev Nutr 1997.1652. “Three cases of oral lichenosis caused by metallic fillings”. “Effects of removing amalgam fillings from patients with diseases affecting the immune system”. 102(4): 390-394.44(3): 246-8. Dermatol. “Elemental imbalance studies by INAA on ALS patients”. & “Oral (90) 323-328. Lin JT.Markow. & Vroom FO. Bio-Probe. ~725-742 Lichtenberg.178(3):108-l 12. Gronquist SO.Adv Med. mercury hypersensitivity.Orlando. “Clinical & histologic changes after removal of amalgam”. 1943: 1648. 1996. “Mercurial neurosis resulting ti-om amalgam fillings”. Dee 1995 (Denmark) 8~ H. Vol. Sasaki et al. Neurotoxicology. M.12.11:52 I-532. 12:890-892. & Lichtenberg H. 1990. J Allergy Clin Immunol95( l)(Pt 2): 145 F. Oral Surgery.Jolly et al. British Journal of Dermatology. P. & (b) M. 111. mercury. Dermatol.Fl.Neurology 46(5): 12751284.

1989. & Amer. Princeton Scientific Press. Poisoning and Toxicolow comDendium.O. Role of gammaglutamyltraspeptidase(GGC) and extracellular glutathione in disposition of inorganic mercury”. 1943. Health Perspect. Environ Health Perspect 1994 Jan.P. D. Evidence for increasing incidence of abnormalities of the human testis: a review. Journal of Clinical Immunology. Altem Med Rev. “Mental retardation and parental occupation”.Hall.Trace Elem. “Personality traits of adolescents with intact and repaired 60(2): 320-327. “Mercury in human colostrum and early breast milk”. Acta Stand 54(3): 176-181. p354(103) C. “Theraoeutic properties of Unitihiol” Farm. (100) “Does mercury from amalgam restorations constitute a health hazard”. “The dental amalgam issue: a review”. “Evaluation of mental functions in workers exposed to metallic mercury”. J. “Mercury in breast milk in relation to fish consumption and amalgam”. 13:235-243. & J. & B.9(4): 437-42. July 1994. “Complexons in the treatment of lupus erghematousus”. 103 (104) (Supp4):79-86. (1 12) A. & R. 1974. 1996. Milk as a Source of Methyl mercury Exposure in Infants.Sikora et al.. & M. “Korrosionserscheinungen an Amalgamf llungen und Deren Auswirkungen auf den Menschlichen Organismus.117 and 170. J.44(4): 385-99.Kampe et al.K.l995. Sci Total Environ. Br J Ind Med 50(10): 945-954. Of Psychotherapy. Experientia.Kishi et al. Psycho1 Rep. 16( 1):3 I-40.48( 11):729-34. 1990.5.610-611. Arch Dermatol47. & “Mercury in pituitary glands of dentists”. Dept.R. Jan 1996. 1998.“Cysteine metabolism and metal toxicity”.l992. 1986. Keiding N.Facemire et al.“Cytotoxicity of retrofil materials”.F. “Renal glutathione and mercury uptake”. Swedish Dental (99) Journal.Leikin & Palouchek. & Grandjean P.Biol.Environ Heath Perspectives. 142(3): I9 I-205 . 1998.199 1. Orthomol. “The distribution of HgC12 in rat body and its effect on fetus”. Education. v12#4 pp 240-4 (1997).A. Jurgensen PJ. & “Mental health.12:23-27. Envir. 123( 1): 19-23. J. Lancet. E. Residual neurobehavioral effects of chronic exposure to mercury vapor”.. 1985. “Biliary secretion of glutathione-metal complexes”. & A. & Giwercman A. NYLANDER et al. 58: 57587.and anxiety”. 1985. “Effect of mercury on the epithelium of the fowl testis”. Siblerud et al.Roeleveld et al. 1986.“Amalgam Removal for Treatment of Arthritis”. 1: 18-22.Marxkors. (1 IO> T.A.“Evidence that mercury from silver fillings may be an etiological factor in multiple (102) sclerosis”.442. J Endodont. & Drasch et al. Med. Arch environ Health. U. Med.M. Pub1 74-473.Maretta et al.Forsbec et al.L.L. Skakkabaek NE. 1998.Henriksson et al.. & A.p288-92.. Lexi-Comp.Quig.Larsson et al.“Defensive characteristics in individuals with amalgam illness”. Med Pr. Br J Ind Med 1991.& Siblerud R.G. Sci Total Environ. Y. 1981: L. Vet Hung I995.lation in tissues from dental staff and controls”.43(2): 109-2 1.1989. 1994.Glavinskiaia et al. J Clinical (101) Periodontol.Tanchyk. Merc&y acc. & “Risk assessmentin relation to neonatal metal exposure”. No. Environ Health Perspect 1993. 1980. Bemdt et al.1992. “Reproductive impairment in the Florida Panther”. 1(3):152-8. 1998. Environ Sci . 1994. amalgam fillings. 1993.p705 Odont (108) M. Occupat. Doctors Data Lab.” Das Deutsche Zahn rztebl.1995 & M.68(6):457-61. Golota.I 994.Chemically Induced Alterations in Functional Develonment.l998.1996. Of Health.1993 (106) R.197O .Colbom(Ed. Evidence That Mercury From Dental Amalgam May Cause Hearomg Loss In Multiple Sclerosis Patoemts. M. Fundam Appl (111) Toxicol. T. “Glutathione inhibits SOD activity of Hg”. 1992. V22.W. & D.Henningsson et al. dentitions”.Environmental Med Research. 99( l-2): l22. 47:9-22. Oral Dis 1995. 24. & ” Developmental Effects of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals”. Med. Chronic effects of mercun/ in organisms. G. & Trachtenberg IM.Clarkson et al.44:95-. and Reproductive Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals” (including mercury).Weiner et al. Zulups et al. and Welfare. 1996.Yang et al. & J.Jay.70(3 Pt2). “Healing of Lichenoid Reactions following Removal of Amalgam”. (113) 12: 24-28.5 1:35-41. Psycho1 Rep.S.Siblerud et al. V 10 1.). Windham.L. Weihe P. Analyst.“Psychometric evidence that mercury from dental fillings may be a factor in (107) depression. 1139-51. . Dermatol Venerol.Hanson et al. & J. vl9. Carlsen E. Ceaurriz et al. T.X. ~262-270.J Appl Toxicol.Oct 1993.Oskarsson et al. R. “Health. Fundam Appl Toxicol. Hormonal.“Psychological effects of low exposure to mercury vapor”.nl .n4.anger. Gen Dent. Liang et al. 1980. M.& A. M. & R. 1993. 14(3): 20 I-. p287-94. 10 1 Suppl(2): 65-7 1. & W. (109) & T.5(5):832-9.5(5):8 16-3 1.N4.256.1996. 1995. Zh. Annotated Bibliography . Arch Inst cardiol Mex. and Kienholz E.53. and MS”..F. “The histopathology of oral mucosal lesions associated with amalgam”. 102( 1):74-7. v74. N. 1994.n6.m. & R. J Toxicol Environ Health.Acta Odont Scand.‘Nylander et aI.Bruce.v42. Feb 26.3:4.5 1(3):234-4 I.43( 1): 153-6.

1994 1B.1993. Wireman et al. T and NK cells in men exposed to mercury”. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. Brain Research. V-TOX.Aschner et al.Hoyt et al. & Heavy Metal Bulletin. 1987. Fall. Schatz JR. “The impact of mercury released from dental “silver” fillings on antibiotic resistance in the primate oral and intestinal bacterial flora”.3. 236( 1): 93-99. Sweden.Langauer-Lewowicka.Occupational & Environmental Medicine. Acta Odontol Scand. “Status of mercury and selenium in dental personnel”. C.Pohl. Boot JH. & Grewal JS. Cytobios 1999.S.(114) (115) (116) (117) (118) (119) (120) (121) (122) (123) (124) (125) (126) M. 1987. U. O’Halloran. 304-332: Risk Characterization and Public Health Implications. Apr 1996. &(b) H. Exp Neurol 1997.htm1. Resistance to antibiotics. Troost D. Stand J Work Environ Health. Mercury levels excreted after Vit C IV as chelator. Nat’1 Academy Press 2000. & The Physiologist 33(4). of Occupational Medicine. & “Lymphocytes. 1992. J Biol Chem 1991. II:1 75-84. Summers AO. & D.Hall. 199 1 & Chang SB et al. “Resistance of the Normal Human Microflora to mercury and antimicrobials”.Issue 1.26 1(5 I22):7 15-25. hydrophobicity and klebocinogeny of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated 6om foods. 37(4) number of fillings Int Symposium “Status Quo and Perspectives of Amalgam and Other Dental Materials” European Academy. Biol Signals 1994.htm . Met Ions Biol Syst 1997. Toxicology 1992. “Role of glutathione metabolism in the glutamate-induced programmed cell death of neuronal cells” Eur J Pharmacol. “Transition metals in control Of gene expression”.Int J Occup Med Environ Health. “The dentist’s exposure to elemental mercury during clinical work”.Ono et al.PovlncehMdls’renorlilijnhlich~s. Br J Ind Med 49: 233-240. National Center for Environmental Health.199O. Localization of metallothionein in the mammilian central nervous system. Mar 2. 1992. & Examination of blood levels of mercurials in practicing dentists. “The behavior of T-Cells in the blood of workers exposed to mercury”.v53. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Centers for Disease Control. Int J Occup Med Toxic01 4(2):285-294.” Changes in the nervous system due to occupational metallic mercury poisoning” Neurol Neurochir Pol 1997 Sep-Oct. & M. Arch Environ Health.Edlund et al. & Matts RL.p44-48.Santos. ~6-8 (200 cured or significantly improved) Liebert CA. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. www.Ronnback et al. “Mechanisms of dopamine-induced cell death and differences corn glutamate Induced cell death”. & U. “Reduced tyrosine uptake in strains sensitive to inorganic mercury”. Glutamate: a potential mediator of inorganic mercury toxicity. Dept. April 29 . Wireman J.” Silver dental fillings provoke an increase in mercury and antibiotic resistant bacteria in the mouth and intestines of primates”.R. (a) L.63(11):4494-503. In vitro evidence for the role of glutatmate in the CNS toxicity of mercury.L.S. Matyja E. & J.l( I): 1995. Dept. Pharmacol Toxic01 74:72-75. & .V.Rowland et al. & “Presence of Micronuclei in lymphocytes of mercury exposed workers’. Anal Toxic01 . Choi BH. Skare et al. dec 5. 1993. et al.1994. 16:340-347. Metab Brain Dis 1996. & P. 7 1(1):66-74. 1997.Summers et al. 1994. A-l 16. Cell Struct Funct 1995. National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals. pp.778( 1):222-32. Qstzenhausen/ v55.cdc. 1991. & Brookes N. 143(2):269-g]. Smith T. APUA Newsletter. 1997. (127) (128) Moszczynski et al.Vimy et al. Stejskal VDM. 1 l(4): 149-53. 98(388):113-23 Tibbling L. 266(19): 12695-702.31(5):905-13. Yonsei Med J 1995.1995. 76(3):245-56. 1996. 20(3): 233-8.S. 1999.2001. L. vvww. CDC. A.O. 21(1):141-50. 1990. 2001.“The Effect of Occupational Exposure to mercury vapor on the fertility of female dental assistants”.11(5):3991. Appl Environ Microbial. Factors affecting blood mercury concentrations in practicing dentists. M.Queiroz et al. 36(3): 299-305.A. Immunological and brain MRI changes in patients with suspected metal intoxication”. Effects of SH-blocking compounds on the energy metabolism in isolated rat hepatocytes.. Kagen R Toxic heavy metal ions inhibit reduction of disulfide bonds. & National Research Council. 1997.cdc.S. of Dental Materials Science. & Baauweegers HG. &(c) Kim P. Hurst R..3: 18 l-7.C. Umea Univ. Tiwari RP. “Chronic encephalopaties induced by low doses of mercury or lead”. Clin Infect Dis 22(6):944-950. Universite de Caen. & Albrecht J.Vol. Science. Toxicological Effects of Methyl mercury (2000). IAkesson et al. “Selective inhibition of glutamate uptake by mercury in cultured mouse astrocytes”. metals.May 1. “Mercury exposure of different origins among dentists and dental nurses”. 1994.Froissard et al. “Metallothionein induction in fetal rat brain by in utero exposure to elemental mercury vapor”. Dent Res. 46(2): 102-I 09. & K. G. “Immunoglobulin Levels in Workers Exposed to Inorganic Mercury”. “Immunoglobulin E in mercury . Med Lav 85(3):239-241. Genet.34:44 l-60 .1995.

p307.M. 113(2):199-208. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed.Leiskir.Fredin. “Mercury in plasma in patients allegedly subject to oral galvanism”.E. “Mercury in cerebrospinal fluid in subjects exposed to mercury vapor”. Bijur GN.E.287(1 50) U. 1987. “Influence of Chewing Gum on Urine Mercury Content”. Lead and mercury mutagenesis: role of H202. Environ Mol Mutagen 1998. S. Zander et aI. Ubl Hyg. 1992. J Orthomolecular Med 5(2): 95 -106. 93:269-297. “Toxicological profile of Mercury”.19( 1): l-7.36( 11): 1260-4. InVivo 8(4):559-63. Stand J (135) Dent Res. and xanthine oxidase.“Trace Elements and thyroid cancer”. “Metals and Neurotoxic Effects”. Arch Toxicol. “Chewing releases mercury”.Larkfors et aI. 114( 1): 57-66. Influence of mercury chloride on resistance to (131) generalized infection with herpes simplex virus type 2 in mice. (146) Gerhard et al.HuItman et al.Y. “Health Effects AAer Dental Amalgam Removal”. “Does amalgam affect the Immune System?” lnt Arch Allergy Immunol 106:180(130) 203. Gay et al.Sato et al.593-602: & I. 36( 11): 1260-64. 19(3):383-92. 1993. R.Ariza et al.“Occupational exposures to metals as risk factors for Parkinson’s disease”.Wood. Stand J of Dental Res. & “Study of workers compensated for mercury intoxication”.Casdorph.Choi et al. K.Gerhard. 1995. (134) L. & L.62(2). Ellermann-Eriksen S.3 1(4):352-61. &M.2:25-30. 1987. (141) Toxic01 Lett. Biochem Mot Toxicol. “An epidemiological study of factors relating to mercury sensitization”. (148) H.7. J of Comp Pathology. superoxide (142) dismustase..“Adverse immunological effects and immunity induced by dental amalgam” FASEB J 81183-l 190. I I exposed workers”. 1991. Swed J Biol Med No. 20(2-3):239-47. & S. 120(3).67(3):205-l 1. “Mutagenic effect of mercury”. .Molin et al. Environmental (13% Research. manganese. (137) ~~8-15 & Summers. . D. and therisk of Parkinson’s disease”. 1999. 1997 Mar. & J. 1999. Sallsten et al. 13(2): 107. 1993. Gore11et al. 4-10-93.Gebel et al. Biol Metals. 1995. (143) P. Science News.& v69(3):305. 1979.Roller et al. 1994. Ariza ME. 100(6): 354-360.Dept. Stand J Dent Res (133) 951328-334. . Linkoping Univ.1994. Ariza et al. 1978.Siblerud. 1992.Bjorkman et el. Toxicology 1996.3 l-33.12. J Dent Res 75( 1):598.“Mechanisms for the Neurotoxicity of Mercury”. & Toxic01 Appl Pharmacol. “Effect of mercuric chloride on macrophage-mediated resistance mechanisms against infection”. & G. 1996. Therapeutikon. 48:3. (132) 1995.1995.1989. (140) RL.. “Evidence that mercury from dental fillings may be an etiological factor in smoking”. N.L.“Methyl mercury induced alterations in the nerve growth factor level in the developing brain ‘I.1996.Boffetta et al. M. 8123:985-98. Neurotoxicology.52(4):661-6. Arerugi 44(2): 86-92. & U. 1995.M.1 B B I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I B I I. J Fert Reprod.Analyst. Institute of Medical Microbiology. Journal of Neurophalogy. (144) (145) J.1994. copper. N. 1992. Sharma et al. J Fert Reprod 1995. A. & M. 1990.R.M. & E.S. 1994.M. 1993. & J Occup Med. Mogensen SC. Neurology. 1998.J Occup Med. & J.3. lead. “Long term use of nicotine chewing gum and mercury exposure f?om dental amalgam”.3.P. 1988. 1988.“Studies on Human Exposure to Mercury Amalgam Fillings”. “Comparison of interaction of meHgC12 and HgC12 with murine macrophages”. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 1994. Sweden. (149) B.478-91.Y. “Studies on the Mercury Release from Dental Amalgam Fillings”. Lancet.Vallon et al. Of Pathology. p7 19733. Vo19 1. & T. “Cytotoxity of Silver amalgam”.Christensen et al. Christensen MM. Plenum (147) Publishing Corp. &(b) T.M. (136) B. (129) P.n3.Gorell et al. . Toxicology.1993. Zentralbl Gynakol. Res Dev Res.Aronsson et al.Ellermann-Eriksen et al.Mori et al. Public Health Service.114. 1994. Vol37. Williams MV. 198 1. 1974.v68. “Carciagenocity of mercury”.Y Zaichick et al.Sallsten et al. Toxic Metal Svndrome. Avery Publishing Group. D.650-8. 190: 325(138) G. Stand J Work Environ Health. “Mercury sensitization caused by environmental factors”.3 1. “Mercury mutagenesis”. “Factors Influencing mercury evaporation rate from dental amalgam fillings”. & M. “Abnormal neuronal migration of human fetal brain”. Enestrom et al.Siblerud et al. “Occupational exposure to mercury. in Organotransitional Metal Chemistry.199( 1):69-75 . “Dental amalgam and mercury”. 65: 195-206. 1997. & R.3.

& Kerkhoff H.K. Momstad H. (166) H. & N. Ericson T. Protocol for Mercury/Silver Filling Removal. & D.L. “Patch test reactions to metal salts in patients with oral mucosal lesions associated with amalgam fillings”. & Heavy Metal Bulletin. 19(6): 405-413. Mercury Amalgam Review Panel. Odense. (163) Ahlrot-Westerlund B. 2001. Dtsch Med Wochenschr . Of Washington. Second Nordic Symposium on Trace Elements and Human Health. Troost D. 1987.Mohamed et al. JADA. “Antibiotic resistance in oral/respiratory bacteria”.1973. “Immunotoxicology of Heavy Metals”. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect.3 13(7048): 44. Denmark.Toxicol. 1991. “Inhibition by mercuric chloride of the in vitro polymerization of microtubules”. (156) E.65(5):3 17-32 1. 1998. disease. ppll4-5. “Inorganic mercury and the CNS: genetic linkage of mercury and antibiotic resistance”. http://emporium. & R.earthlink. “A Scientific Response to the American Dental Association Special Report and Statement of Confidence in Dental Amalgam.1 949.58(3):2 19-24. “Effect of mercury on human sperm motility”.1985. 117(37): 13 83-9(German).netiP/PDHA/mercury/asr.Windham. “Effect of heavy metals on in vitro interaction between human sperm and cervical mucus”.Miller et al. Contact Dermatitis.275(49):38620-5. Smith RG.B. p338.K.l995. 1993. Vol 6. Langworth et al. Use of primary cultures to sutdy astrocytic regulatory functions.9(4):522(162) N. IAOMT. Acta Odontal Stand. & Amer J Vet Res.198O. Aug 1987.R.White et al. Toxicol(Copenhagen). No. & A. 157-l 60. “Toxicology of Inorganic Mercury”. 1992. “Effects of low exposure to inorganic mercury on the human immune system”.Arch Dermatol Syphilol.tumpike. 1986. Crit Rev Oral biol Med.Nielsen et al. & de Saint-Georges et al. Univ. Arch of Toxicology.1976.] 992. Int Dent J 19:48 l-8. 2:269-279.L Olsted et al.M. Cognitive and Behavioral Effects of Toxic Metals.50(2):101-11.p1457-. Neurotoxicology. “Health Risks from Increases in Methyl mercury Exposure”.Djerasci et al. Adv Neurol 1995.B. Skoglund A . “Comprehensive Medical Examination of patients with alleged adverse effects from dental amalgams”. & A. & E. 68:47-57. Toxic01 1991. 85:560-5. J Dent Res.” Evaluation of effect of mercury on reproductive function of animals”.I 990. 92: 124-7. “Trace element imbalances in the brains of Alzheimer’s patients”.net/P/PDHA/mercu~/iaomt. 9: 197-208. Gig Sanit. & F. Windham.1993. 1994.Lorscheider. (165) Anneroth G. 1987. & EPRI Journal. 60( 1):29-36. “Mercury vapor inhibits tubulin binding “. Dept. 12: 48-5 1. Infammatory cells in the peripheral nervous system in motro neuron Acta Neuropathol 1993. International Academy of oral Medicine and Toxicology. of Health. Ivanitskaia. BMJ. Stand J Work Environ Health.home.K.Emst et al. 178(5):562-6. 22:284-7.3(4):23 l-58 (167) M. & IAOMT. & Appel Sh. FASEB J. Mercury hypersensitivity among dental students. Vol533. 199 1. & J Biol Chem 2000 Dee 8. “Prevalence of Mercury Hypersensitivity among Dental Students”.G.D. EPRI Technical Brief:“Mercury in the Environment”.C.Mottet et al. E.1985.Haley. J Dent Res.htm (154) K. & M.27:3. “Declining sperm count: evidence that Young’s syndrome is associated with mercury”. 1992.p12513 I . Dee 2000. “Effects of methyl mercury on testicular functions in monkeys”.(15 I) (152) Electric Power Research Institute. 59:pll68.97( 1): 19-22. 65:498-503.Toxicology. Of Pathobiology.1 969. Mohamed et al. (158) Wenstrup et al. (over 150 medical study references) www. 66(6): (153) . & B. “Health Effects of Toxic Metals: An Annotated Bibliography”.1993.68(6):440-4.L. & Nutrition Research. vol34.Lorscheider et al. 1984. & Walum E et al. April 1990.J Goldwater.Health Perspect.Eggert-Kntse et al. ~0163 :I 33140.Basun et al. Johansson I.Nordlind et al.9(4):A3485. Louwerse ES.Roberts. Vol28. 1957. (155) L. 1996.Daily et al. “Metals in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in normal aging and Alzheimer’s’s disease”.1995 & Vance et al. CR Seances Sot Biol al. “Evaluation of Mercury in Hair & Blood as Biomarkers for Methyl mercury Exposure”. 1985 Supplement (164) Swedish National Dept. (159) W. Contact Dermatitis. Multiple Sclerosis and mercury in cerebrospinal fluid. (157) L.neti-bemiewl (161) F. Issue 3. Research.Robinson et al. Annals: NY Acad Sci. 64:Abstract 1472. (160) B. “Correlation between amalgam restorations and mercury in urine”. Contact Dermatitis due to Amalgam fillings”. POB 608531..Koller.. Int J of Immunopharm. & M.l999. 1988. “Epidemiologic Study of occupational Contact Dermatitis in the Dental Clinic”. Clin Exp Pharmoacol Physiol 1995. & M. Autoimmunity as an etiological factor in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Kawahara et al. http://emporium.F.htm.tumpike.2. Orlando.32860-853 1. & J.

S. 1976. & Science of the Total Environment. Pharmacol Toxicol. & Vimy M.Kinjo et al. DZander et al.“Mercury release from amalgam into saliva”. “Urinary mercury excretion in dental (172) personnel”. 1992. & J Orthomol Psych. 1989. (182) Pleva J. I998.64: 1069-107 1 &” Serial Measurements of Intra Oral Mercury” Journal Dental Research 1985. 135: 363-376. “mercury exposure from dental amalgam”. “Amalgam: Quecksilberdamfe bis ins Gehrin”. “Mercury: god of TH2 cells”. der Kassenarzt 4.118( 1):58-62 S. & (b)“Contact allergy to dental restorative materials in patients with oral lichenoid lesions”. Brugnolo F. Br Dent J. 94(3): 179-85. 1997. Horikawa T.Laine et al. of Environmental Medicine. Lead differentially modifies cytokine production in vitro and in vivo. Toxic01 Appl Pharmacol. Oral Roberts Univ. 8(3): 128-41. & “Mercury.3.23(1):77-83.. Of Umea.Nilsson et al. 1973. & “Resolution of OLL after replacement of amalgam restorations”. 24(1). Origin of infections in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. & G. J Dermatology. Oral (168) Pathol Med 1999.308-13.126( 1): I O-I 5(20 cases). & Huggins HA. and dental aides”. Pinto OF et al. Hartmann HA. & (c) Murdoch RD. & L.Ngim et al.199O. “Mercury excretion and occupational exposure of dental personnel”.1987.a public health hazard”. 1992.I 02(2):229-30. A. 1997. Clinical Exp Immunol. Ingram J. Enhancement of antibody and IgE production by mercury and platinum salts. Int J Risk & Safety in Med. “Mercury exposure of male dentists. F. Dept. 18(3): 143-8. Greene WI-I. Rev Environ Health 1O(I): I-27 (1994) . 1992. B. Vol3. & Y. 1992.2. Young WH.Barregard et (176) I. “Quantitative cytochemical studies of RNA in experimental mercury poisoning”. Proposed role of dental amalgam (180) toxicity in leukemia and hemotopoietic dyscrasias. 1990. 4(3):141. & Schimpff SC. 1983.10(6):221-32. Journal of Dental Research. Pepys J.I I I 1 1 D I I 1179-I 182. Neuroepidemiology. P. 3: l-22.Lenihan et al. 1973.Reviews on Environmental Health. “Mercury hazards in dental practice”.Jokstad et al. A. 1989. Genetic and Environmental Factors Contributing to the Onset of Allergic Disorders. “Daily dose calculations from measurements of intra-oral mercury vapor”.Lussi.W. 28(3): I 17-21. Contact Dermatitis. . 1743-7. Univ. R. & Gelbier S. (177) 71(2):414-23.“Epidemiologic study on the association between body burden (169) mercury level and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease”.A Public Health Hazard”. J (178) Oral Ther Pharm.Community Dent Oral (171) Epidemiology. female dentists. March 1985. Lawrence DA. Annals of International Medicine 1972. C. I996. 196. J Epidemiol. 1965. “Dental amalgam and mercury”. & Mercury poisoning from dental amalgam. and Lorschieder. 10: l-27.Siblerud.Nixon et al.Pt2. lO(I-2):1-14.1992.L. J Dent Res. Mercury from dental amalgams: exposure and effects. (181) Parsons PJ. “An Assessment of Mercury in Mouth Air”.J Pleva.23. 1: 5 12. Psycho1 Rep.35-40 A. (179) & Kind1 A. International J of Biosocial and Medical Research.. Of Orthomol. J. IO3. “Comparison of the developmental effects of 2 mercury compounds on glial cells (175) and neurons in the rat telencephalon”. 1994. I I7:46.Jokstad. 1996. Medicine 1989. I2 1(1):2-9. Maggi E. University of Calgary ” Intra oral Mercury Released from Dental Amalgam” Journal of Dental Research 1985. 70(4). Public Health (1989). 1992. Zentralbl Hyg (173) Umweltmed. “Cancer mortality in patients exposed to methyl mercury through fish diet”. 1986. Dtsch Med (174) Wochenschr. & Chang LW. 1139-51. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. Sampognaro S. & Adachi A. 70(3). Zinecker S. & Swed Dent J. J. Vol 12. 64:1072-1075. J. Monnet-Tschudi et al. Acta Neruopathol(Berlin).& (d) Parronchi P. J Intl Acad Prev Med.1 995. & Emler & Cardone.148. 1986.. & (b) Heo Y. “Mercury in the mouth mucosa of patients with amalgam fillings”. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol I986 80: 405-I I . I 1:84-93.12-19. 1992.74 1: 52-59.193(4):318-28. B. 103(6):722-29. “Efficacy of dental metal elimination in the management of atopic dermatitis”. Int Arch Allergy Immuno12OOO Jan. No. No. “A comparison of mental health of multiple sclerosis patients with silver dental fillings (170) and those with fillings removed”. Mathieson. 13 8: 149-57. “Possible fetotoxic effects of mercury vapor: a case report”.36:3.Olsson et al. Brain Research. “lmmunocompetent cells in amalgam-associated oral licheinoid contact lesions”. 1992.I 993.77:707-7 11. Br J Dermatol. “Dental mercury . Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. Swed Dent J.H.14 I-6.6(3): 134-8.Willershausen et al.

Gerhard I.Soong et al. 1970. Polakowska. & “Schwem~etallbelastungen bei Patientinnen mit Alopezie” Arch Gynecol. Compendium.254(14):278-80. Dept. 18(4):482-489. “Alopecia and environmental pollution” Klinisches Labor (187) 1992. Biomaterials. (185) L. 81:923-25. and brain tumors”. 455-61.1306-7. Medical School Dissertation (196) Dept.Sugiyama et al. 16(5):334-9.D. Eur J (190) Neurology. Japan. Ann Neural. Obstet.L. 1998. School of Dental Research..44:. Toxicology. “Mercury concentrations in blood of Danish dentists”. JADA. 1989.B.Certosimo et al..27(2):135-41.60(3): 15 lKlobusch J. (192) Nippon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi. & R.63(2):202-3. & “Endemic clustering of multiple sclerosis in time and place”. 10 l(1): 2 l-3 1. Atlanta. & J. J of Formosa Medical Assoc. 1993. & Craelius W. Department of Radiation Sciences. 1986. Spencer et al.. Gastrointestinal and in vitro release of metals from conventional and copper-rich amalgams.K. 90(l): fluid” 59-65. Dent Mater. AtIanta. “Occupational disease in dentistry”.45(3):22 l-5..Brune et al. Box 535. Division of Physical Biology. 1988.H. Perry et al. Stand J Dent Res. WHO. 1.. (189) P. U. & T. 163-175. dental nurses. A Complete Guide to Mercurv Toxicitv from Dental Fillinsrs Scripps Publishing.N.185(9):436. Kinki Univ. 1985. Runnebaum B. 1997. Br Dent J 1998.Ship et al. 1991. 1999.Meyer et al. G.CDC. Inorganic Mercury. 6( 1):61-66.476. Vol 4. No I. 1998. 1986. “Regulation of hepatic glutathione synthesis: current concepts (194) and controversies”. “Arch Gynecol. 1991. School of Materials Science. FASEB J. Biometals.D. Obstet. “Risk evaluation of the occupational environment in dental care”. Lu SC. 1983. Univ.99( 12): 1243-54.l999.Taylor. 1996.Owens et al.1302. Suzuki et al.Ogletree et al. Mercury in biological fluids after amalgam removal.“The intrapartum content of toxic metals in maternal and umbilical cord blood”. 3:32-35. “Hallevorden-Spatz Disease: cysteine accumulation and cysteine dioxygenase deficiency”.lngalls.A. Of Basal Oral Sciences. Ginekol Pol.Jones. “Concentrations of heavy metal in maternal and umbilical cord blood”. “Comparison of heavy metal concentrations in human umbilical cord blood in 1980 and 1990:. Criterion. 11(5):332-6. 101.199O.Prosthet Dent. 38:469. Gen Dent. and WHO.A. (186)Yang J. & AAhlbom et al..254:277-g.7. Sandborgh-Englund et al.Bjorklund. 13( 10): I 169-83. Br Med J. 14( 10). J Dental Res. & J Forsenic Medicine and Pathology. Sandborgh-Englund. “lntraoral galvanic corrosion”. Tidsski Nor Laegeforen. 1990. J of Epidemiological and Community Health 32: 155-65. 1998.Zalups et al. “Oral Electricity”. “Electric current around dental metals as a factor producing allergic metal ions in the oral cavity”. Comparative epidemiology of multiple sclerosis and dental caries”.l985. “Health outcomes following amalgam removal”.Ong et al. 1996. 1993. (191) Stand J Dent Res.Rose et al. 1953. 10: 213-5. & R. N. 1990. “Localized galvanic shock after insertion of an amalgam restoration”.. Annals of Clin & Lab Sci. Osaka. 1982-1985. & Y. 1999. 1988. 1989. Rabe T. & (188) P. & L. of Penn. & M.. Environmental Health Criteria 101 .1. Amer. GIT. Ga.Am J Fors Med & Pathology. “The tarnished history of a posteria restoration”. I-49.Gronla et al. Methyl Mercury. “Neurological examination on 3 groups of workers exposed to mercury vapor”. & Johansson E.6(5): 57 l-7. A. 11 l(8): 948-50.Scand J Work Environ & Health.H.Urban et al. Environmental Health Criteria 118. Of Tokyo. J Hepatol. & G. 1980. 1995.K.(183) World Health Organization(WHO).75 1 2 I Uppsala. & Environ metal Health. Liliefors T. National Naval Dental Center. 29(4):595-602.7:3-g. Karolinska Institute. “Heavy elements in root tips from teeth with amalgam fillings”.(Stockholm). Of Human Ecology. & R. D. Dent Assoc. & T.Sikorski et al. etiology and prevention of MS”. (197) . & R.Fors Med Path. “Maternal-fetal transfer of metallic mercury via the placenta and milk”. Sweden E. & B. “Neurological Assessment of Health Status in Dentists”.J. Kunzel et al. (195) 96( 1): 56-9. & R. 1986.Cohen et al. Sept. Am J. :Dentists. Geneva. & B. & C. Clustering of multiple sclerosis in Galion.1977. & “Metal release from dental materials”.& G.“Effect of mercury on corrosion of eta’CuSn phase in dental amalgams”. & (193) G. 1993. 202(652 1):662. Parsons. 109(l): 15-29. 1991. Pharmakinetics of mercury corn dental amalgam”.Moller-Madsen et al. & Epidemiology. B. School of Medicine. Med Pr. New Zealand Psychology Journal. Mar 1983. Ohio. J.S. 1993.M.77(4): 615-24.Ekenvall et al. 1993. Amer J Forensic Med Path01 1989. Eastman Dental Institute. Arch Dis Child.91:66-71 & Sci Tot Envir. Wang Yl.44(4):324-6. 1983.N. & D. Univ. 1994.1304. Bergdahl. “Mercury Concentration in Cord Blood”. (184) T.69(2): 14 l-3. Toxicology Division. “Mercury in human amniotic .“Nephrotoxicity of inorganic mercury co-administered with L-cysteine”. “Sensory perception in the hands of dentists” J Work Environ Health. & S.Nogi.

K. “Intake of mercury from fish and the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular disease in eastern Finnish men”.(198) (199) (200) WI) (202) (203) (204) (205) (206) (207) (208) (209) (2101 (211) (212) (213) (214) (215) (21’3 E. 5(3): 102-109. Dr.& B.T.Kishimoto et al.V.L. & “Prenatal exposure to mercury vapor: Effects on brain development”.T. Amalgam and Health. West et al.M. Universitat “The prediction of intake of mercury vapor 6om amalgams”. & Dental Mercuq m. 2(4): 709-761. 1995. & G. Lakartidningen. Circulation..Larose. Intravenous inorganic mercury intoxication”. 1991. Kousmine. gamma globulin (IVIG) treatment of autoimmune kidney disease associated with mercury ( Hg++) toxicity... ~~1578-1583. & (b) Miller DM. T. Ziff et al.-Similarity to Lesions in Alzheimer’s Diseased Brains”. FRN. A.Plenum Press.. Nuyts et al. “Mercury in dental filling materials. “Status Quo and perspectives of amalgam and other dental materials”. ISBN O-94 101 I-08-9. Reactivity of Hg(I1) with superoxide: evidence for the catalytic dismutation of superoxide by Hg(II). Inc.. Beating Alzheimer’s’s. I 00:3 I-8. 1993.A. & (e) G. H..W. 1996..273(3/2): 1199. Of Kentucky Dept.ApriI. T. Richardson et al. Dent. FRN. 1997 http://wvw. 346(8966):7-l 1: & Riometals.R. p 1. Of Medicine. 10(1):121-40. Ott 11: 49(2):113-25.Vimy et al. & J.environmental medicine risk analysis”.. 1997.D.l999] M. Dept. 1995.Zamm. IAOMT Symposium paper. Exper. ISBN O-94 101 I-04-6. Bio-Probe. Neurotoxicology 1997. Teratol.50(3): 103243.Deyhle. J Toxicol Environ Health. Inc.J. Mark Richardson. “Renal oxidant injury induced by mercury”. Pendergrass JC. http://www. Amer J Physiol. “Amalgam declared hazardous”. Lichtenberg-100 Danish patients. Journal of Trace Elements in Experimental Medicine.S. Bio-Probe.Nath et al. J Biochem Toxicol 1991 . (cases:FDA Patient Adverse Reaction Reports-762.Friberg.Y. Dr.F. 89(37):29 18-23.6(4):293-8.pl99-246 & ~247-260.#6. Salonen et al.80 Canadian patients.“A Monte Carlo Assessment of Mercury Exposure and Risks from Dental Amalgam”. J Allergy Clin Immunol95( l)(Pt 2): 145. p47-48.1984.bioprobe. Neurotoxicol. 1. in: [Swedish Council for Coordinating and Planning Research.W. Biol Res Preg Perinatal. 1995. 1992..34:461L. Dentistrv without Mercury.Hanson-Swedish patients-519(incIudes many MS). ADV. Lance& 1991.Health Canada. February. M. March 1997 & “Mercury Vapor Inhalation Inhibits Binding of GTP . & Richardson M. 1988. “Autoimmune Disorders”. 1997. Bio-Probe.p853. Woods IS.Vimy and F. 3 1B(4): 232-4. “Is amalgam in dental fillings hazardous to health?“. Clarkson et 18(2)::3 15-24. 10. pp. Ultrastructural changes in renal proximal tubules after chronic organic and & (d) McCann et al.Danielsson et al. Of Calgary. Faculty of Medicine. J. 22 patients(see (26)) Dr.& K. M. N. 1: 7(?) & M. 86 Colorado patients. Assessment of Mercurv Exposure and Risks from Dental Amalaam.“Ferotoxicity of inorganic mercury: distribution and effects of nutrient uptake by placenta and fetus”. Vol. European Journal of Cancer. Kidney Int. “Field Study on the Mercury Content of Saliva”. 1995. Univ. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology. Dr.J. Amalgam and Health.337. Ziff. “New occupational risk factors for chronic renal failure”. Med. Lund BO. Haley BE. Final Report. Oral Oncology. R. 8th Edition.Institut fur Organische Chemie. Sehnert. M. Inc. Textbook of Biochemistry. in Bioloaical Monitorina of Toxic Metals. Environmental Health Perspective.R. “Localized cellular inflammatory response to subcutaneously implanted dental mercury”. Multiple Sclerosis is Curable. Univ. Lancer 1995. A Persuasive New Look at Heart Disease As It Relates to Mercurv. 91(3):645-55. “Documented Clinical Side Effects to Dental Amalgams”. MacMillan Co. “Association between dental restorations and carcinoma of the tongue”.pI 103. M..L. (20..? Dr. & (c)Ware RA et al. July 1991. P.000 people tested for mercury level in saliva and health status/symptoms compiled) V. 1999. 3 15-23 Tom Warren. . Dr. RSiblerud. Univ. & Danielsson et al. 1992. Lorscheider. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. 1995. Avery Publishing Group. 1957.Nadarajah et al. Trace Elem. “Renal function and amalgam mercury”. Part B. Advance. 1999 Mats Berlin. International symposium proceedings. 1996. Lorscheider et al. in: Swedish Council for Coordinating and Planning Research. & F. G. October 1997. Res.uni-tuebingen. Dr. 1990. 1975. Jan 1995.G. Environ Res. 18:129-l 34. Ma et al.112. l993.. I(6): 13 I 134. & Met Ions Biol Syst. Of Chemistry “ The Toxic Effects of Mercury on CNS Proteins: Similarity to Observations in Alzheimer’s’s Disease”. I 989. Environmental Health Directorate. 1 I I-123. Dentistry Today. Of Minnesota. 6(4): 155-l 63. PKraub & M.Berlin. & SZiff.F. C.3.html.Thieme Verlag Struttgart. “Methyl mercury injury of Cultured Human Vascular Endothelial Cells”. of American College of Cardiology V33. (Study findings) & 1.

in (293). Chek Printing Co. Wood JM. “A syndrome clinically resembling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis following chronic mercurialism”. & Ridley WP. & Bauer. Shenker et al.Miller et al. 1992. & E. Dee 1969. Minnesota Medicine. & M. Phoenix.Quebec) Dr. Amer. Dept. Keats Publishing. Recent studies on biomethylation and demethylation of toxic elements. & Kazantis et al. Biologische Zahnmedzin. Sellars WA. Of Health. Quarterly J.DeSimone et al. 6( 1): 33-37. Archives of Environ Health. 1991. editor. Daunderer. Dizikes L. Applied Envir Microbiology. “Nephrotic Syndrome Following Exposure to Mercury”. Neurology 11:639-644 (1961) S. & http://www. J. Nature Vol304: 633. Chemical Sensitivitv.. 1995. & “Besserung von Nerven. R.S. F. Cutler. &(b) B. Rogers. Thomas D. & A. “Transformations of inorganic mercury by candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae”.atsdr. “Inhalation during removal of amalgam restorations”. 1.443. 1996(www). Director. Clostridium Tonomura”Formation of methyl Mercury Compounds from inorganic Mercury by cochlearium” J Ferment Technoll972 50: 159-I 660 (a)B. M. & Yamada. Rojko JL.Allgen. “Mercury Nephrotoxicity”. J Oral Med 28(4):100-104.1973 . 1973. Dept. Vol 15:p64. Of Penn. 1994(case histories documented). 153(2):250-7 1998. Ecomed-Verlag. Duke Univ. “ A relationship between Vit B-12. and methylation”. 1982. Immunopharmacologicol Immunotoxical. Lustmuhle.000 cases) Nicholson et al. 190( 10):558-60 & http://atsdrl .Niedersachsiscles Umweltministerium. Forum Prakt. Lucas AD. & Friberg et al. & Stonehouse CA.47(2): 167-73. vol 143. 1967.Davis.May 28.Lash. MRL:elemental mercury ~apor/inhalation/chronic & MRL: methyl mercury/ oral/acute.und Immunschaden nach Amalgamsanierung”.S. Winning the War against Asthma & Allergies. 6(4): 152-7. & 1993. DAMS(SOO-3 1 l-6265) M. Cutright et al. Health Canada. 1976 & Discovery.H. Cheh A.E. Paracelsus Allergy Clinic. 1962. Landsberg. S. The toxicity of mercury in Dental . 15(2-3):273-90.. Hughes. Handbuch der Amalcamverziftung.1999 Media Advisory. Vol3 1: 403-4 18.html. Dr. 1992.l9:43-6 & R. Environmental Health Perspective. Rau.102( I 1). The Allergy Center. Toxicol Lett 1999. & “Amalgamtest”. “Dementia and Alzheimer’s’s Disease”. Newman AP. Ecomed Verlag. Of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 4(4):317-24. Toxicological Profile for Mercury 1999. Public Health Service.D. New MRLs for toxic substances.. 1994. & Dr. ISBN 3-609-7 1750-5 (in German). B.& Rossi AD. ATSDR ToxFAQ CAS# 7349-97-6. & C Arch Environmental Health.Arzt. Of Medicine. & 14(3):539-53. Univ.Nimmo et al. 78:p25-29. No 4:440. “Kidney injury after chronic exposure to inorganic mercury”. 199 1. M. 1990. & Goering PL. Dept.cdc.J. Cell Death and Differentiation 1997. Golden et al.Viviani B. & Toxicologische erfahrungen am menchen. 7:245-247. Mercuric chloride-induced apoptosis is dependent on protein synthesis. Univ. Pierre Blaise. Br Dent J 2001 May 26. Life Sci. School of Dental Med. Shenker et al “Immune suppression of human T-cell activation”. 63(2): 1990 Feb. Of Prosthodontics.S. 105(3): 183-95.“Immunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes: Alterations in cell viability” Immunopharmacologicol Immunotoxical. and potentiates NMDA toxicity in cerebral granule neurons. Feb 1997 (TV. & L. 1983. ( amalgam removal & DMPS.Aschr.Zom et al. Vahter M. & Kantarjian A. D. & “Amalgam”. 14(3):555-77. & N. Defense Against Mvsterv Svndromes”. Inorganic mercury modifies Ca2+ signals. Temple Univ. Of Texas Southwestern Medical School “Methyl mercury in dental amalgams in the human mouth”.E.(217) (218) (21% (220) (221) (222) (223) (224) (225) (226) (227) (228) (22% (230) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Shelton. Landsberg 1998. 1995. Of Probiotic Dentistry and Medicine. & Apr 19. Of Pathology. Toxic01 Appl Pharmacol. Environ Health Perspect 1977 Aug. SelIars R. Amer. 14(3):555-77. Jan 1991. Yannai et al.F. 1990. 228-33. & March. J Prosthet Dent.cdc.J. M.Dtsch. “Mercuric chloride induces apoptosis in human T lymphocytes”.atsdr. Mercury vapour release from a dental aspirator.. over 5. T. mercury uptake. Arizona. triggers apoptosis. 29(S): 2 13-4. 19. Quecksilber in der umwelf-hearing zum amalgamproblem”.html U. Biochem Biophys Acta. Switzerland. & “Improvement of Nerve and Immunological Damages after Amalgam Removal”. U.“Systemic mercury levels caused by inhaling mist during high-speed amalgam grinding”.E. .891-905. Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine 1996.

*** Dr. Fall 1994. Hinkleman et al. 33:788-790. R. Environ Health Perspect. Sweden. Voegel JC. & A. National Research Council of Canada. & Hultman P. D. 108(2): 196-9.1996 and No. Pearson Dl. Clinical and Exper Immunology. and polishing amalgam restorations”. Dr. & J. researcher on mercury in brains of dead infants and fehises. “Improved Health after Removal of dental amalgam fillings”.H.chairman. Arch Neurol.S. CDA Journal. Issue 2.W. Jul.EPA. Univ. Supp 3: 663-73. 48(4):335-60. 8 1(4):275288 & R. Hypotheses. and Facial Pain. Boyd Haley. Dr. Of Kentucky researcher on mercury in the brain and Alzheimer’s’s Disease ( http://www.l976.Klock. Professor of Medical Physiology. 1997. Enestrom S. K. p44-47.S. (3 1 cases) Sven Langworth et al. Dept. “Lethal mercury poisoning in a dental assistant”. Apr 1971. J Nat! Cancer Inst. The CFIDS Chronicle. 1994 H. Of Arizona. David Eggleston. Lindvall et al. removing.G.J.Schoeny. p 17. Ott 2 1. 199 1.M. Environ Health Perspect 1999. Neuro-Toxicologist. 1995.H. Of California.13. K. 5 1(4):335337.E.Varga et al. Int Arch Allergy 1mmuno1. The calcium-selenium-mercury connection in cancer and heart disease”.Iyer et al. “Genotoxicity of phenylHg acetate in humans as compared to other mercury compounds”. Goteborg. BBC Panorama Program on Dental Amalgam:“The Poison in Your Mouth”.l997 (286 cases).24( 11): 155 l-8. May 2 1989. 5( I):3 l-35 & G. & Haikel Y. Univ. P. Ren Fail 1999 May-Jul.J. J Biomed Mater Res 1990 Nov. et a1. Swedish Assoc.Foster. Univ. Abstract 960. Hultman P. “Can mercury cause Alzheimer’s’s”.“Amalgamnews and Amalgamkadefonden. Hultman P. Neck. 1999. researcher on reproductive problems and birth defects in dental workers. & C. “Use of genetic toxicology data in U. Huddinge Hospital. Vasken Aposhian. Nor Tannlaegeforen Tid.Hamre. Ripa U.71(2): 269-274. Alzheimer’s’s Dis Assoc Disord . “Trace metals in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in Alzheimer’s’s disease”. eyes. Augl9. Of Munich. Mercury from Dental Amalgam and Chronic Fatigue Syndrom”. Professor of Oral Biology and Dental Medicine.Momstad. 104.altcorp. “Effekt av amalgamavl%gsnandepB patienter som misstanker att de lider eller har lidit av amalgamfdrgiftning”. & Rubin. JConstantinidis et al. U.A.3. Lupus-prone mice as model to study xenobiotic-induced autoimmunity. 74(SE): 13 1. 107(Suppl 5): 729-735. “High incidence of cross stimulation by natural allergens of rat basophilic leukemia cells sensitized with IgE antibodies”. 1996. Biochemistry. Lupus. Blomgren J. 1997 and Svenska Dogbladet. Gasser P. FDI World Dental Congress. Dtsch Med Wohenschr. Of Geneva Medical School. 1995. Univ. (www) & International DAMS & Heavy Metal Bulletin.1993. E. Andrup B. “Autoimmunity and Heavy Metals”. 1995. & F. “Exposure to mercury vapor during setting. 1973. Tandl&utidn 81(23):1297-1302 (1989) .Gainer.5 1(2) et al.Swe Adolph Coors Foundation. P. 1996. (www. 3(4):23 lP. Jan 1996: 86( l-4): 93-99 . 1994. Bigazzi. Univ. & Klock B. p7. researcher on mercury in the brain. No. 1998. J Dent Res. “Effects of aluminum and mercury on the structure of chromatin”. “A case of panarteritis nodoa associated with chronic mercury poisoning”. “Mercury release during ultrasonic scaling of amalgam”. Univ. 392(3):269-76. Larsen. J Neural Transm Park Dis Dement Sect 1991. Of Geriatric Medicine. Vol VII.Walker et al. et al. (23 8) (23% (240) (241) (242) (243) (244) (245) (246) (247) World Health Organization Scientific Panel Members( Dr. 3: 449-453. & Nielsen JB.8.(231) (232) (233) (234 (23% (236) P-37) Amalgam.H. & Pollard KM. Dr.“Mercut-yDischarge in Waste Water from Dental Clinics” Water Air and Soil Pollution. Dr. Bjorklund. June 1982. “Adverse health reactions in skin. Of (over 1000 cases) (Sweden has banned amalgam fillings & Gov’t maintains health records on all citizens) . J.R.Lindforss.l99 1 P. American Academy of Head. 102(9):323-325.C. Head.Basun et al. G. Echeverria. Lars Friburg. “Hypothesis regarding amyloid and zinc in the pathogenisis of Alzheimer’s Disease”. EPA risk assessment:the mercury study”. Experimental studies on genetically determined susceptibility to mercury-induced autoimmune response. Dept. Wronski et al.Berglund. “Mercury Poisoning in a dentist”. “Mercury in the Dental Practice: Contamination of Ambient Air and Waste Water. Archives of Environmental Health. Murray Vimy.Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. Dr. Of Calgary Medical School. 1988. Spring 1997. Of Dental Mercury Patients. H.28(9):391 l-3915. Univ. Mercury induced antinuclear antibodies in mice. Fritz Lorscheider.Ostlin).21(3-4):343-8. “Activation of Rauscher leukemia virus by metals”.Lokken. and respiratory tract among dental personnel in . Gustav Drasch.D. Salek P.Bjemer~elm.Murphy.Lonnroth et al. Mar 1977. “Coors Amalgam Study: Effects of placement and removal of amalgam fillings”. Molecular and Cellular Biology. Dr. 1. June 1994. H.

Vol 19. Smith et al. organolead. 14l:I. 18(2): 129-34. Apr 1996 & J. & “Mercury exposure from silver fillings”. Toxicology.22( l-2): 33-45. 40(2-3): 1993. (248) Y. Biometals & Zabinski Z. Nov 22. 1995. (264) B. Med Tr Prom Ekol. p4 17. 1996. “The effect of inorganic mercury on placental amino acid transport”. 17( 1): 29 l-5: & Hryhorczuk E et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. Danielsson et al. ‘& “Behavioral effects of prenatal metallic mercury inhalation exposure in rats”. “lmmunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes: Alterations in cellular glutathione content”. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol.D. Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research. of Pennsylvania. (253) S. 74(2-3):151-160.K. resolved by challenge with penicillamine. “Quantitative analysis of tremor in Minamata disease”. Woods et al.13(2): I7 I-85. British Journal of Industrial Medicine. 183-I 90. & “Altered porphyrin metabolites as a biomarker of mercury exposure and toxicity”. & M.Finkelstein.Iioka et al.2(4):238-40.Ngim et al. “Nitric Oxide mediated mitochondrial damage in the brain”.Shenker et al. 1989. 1990. Vol97. Neural. (256) D.Omura et al. Woods et al. Jan 1983. Urinary mercury levels in females: influence of dental amalgam fillings. 1998.C. Jan 1998. Tokhoku J Exp Med. 1995 (Russian) I. 1997. Toxicol Ind Health 2000 Feb.l49150:263-5. “Urinary porphyrin profiles as biomarker of mercury exposure: studies on dentists”. Acupuncture & Electrotherapy Res.Rybicki et al.& A.Bolanos et al.Sweden”. 17(3-4). “Heavy metals and antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli isolates f%omambulatory patients”.R. “Cerebrospinal fluid biopterin is decreased in Alzheimer’s’s disease”. Dabrowski Z.B.76(7): 1397-404.H. Aug 1995. “Catecholoamine-related enzymes and the biopterin cofactor in Parkinson’s”. and Jan 10. 19(4):401(249) C. 15(2-3):273-90.Kay et al.Mittal et al.Martin et al.J. & “Latent effects of methyl mercury on the nervous system after prenatal exposure”. “Effects of Porphyrinogenic Metals on Coproporphrinogen Oxidase in Liver and Kidney” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. Nippon sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. J (260) Toxicol Environ Health. of Occupational Medicine.Aguiar et al. Dept. Contact Dermatitis. 1993. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1984. Heart Disease Research Foundation. (257) 62(724): 113-123. p235-. (258) J. “Role of mercury in resistant infections and recovery after Hg detox with cilanh-o”. (26 1) New Scientist: This Week. Feb 1996. Arch Neural. “Pteridines and mono-amines: relevance to neurological damage”.87-92. 1996. & A.Yamiguchi et al. Fall 1996. & J. Of Singapore. Univ. “The Neurotoxicology and pathology of organomercury. 1996.l6(2):58-64. Rutowski J. Postgrad Med J. and organotin” J Toxicol Sci.39(2): 202-6. 1998. & Yamanaga H. 6:13-I 5.35(4): 229-33. Physiol Pharmocol. B. Moszczynski P. Neurotoxicology. p4 (and editorial). 1993.“Occupational contact urticaria”.“Parkinson’s disease mortality and the industrial use of heavy metals in Michigan”. J. & L.P. Swed Dent J. 1990. 1992. & “Behavioral effects of neonatal metallic mercury exposure in rats”. 8c T. 2 19(4580):75-77. 1996.Oct 1986. 13-22 (25 1) Y. & Canadian J Physiology and Pharmacology. & T. J Dent Res. “Multiple Chemical Sensitivity Disorder in patients with neurotoxic illnesses”. 1987. 43( 10): 996-9.NY. 1992.M. Treatment of Mercury Intoxication in a Dentist with penicilamine. (254) al-Saleh I. Neurotoxicol Teratol. Shinwari N. mercury (255) D.“Prenatal exposure to metallic mercury vapor and methyl mercury produce interactive behavioral changes in adult rats”. “Validity of urine samples for low-level mercury exposure assessmentand relationship to porphyrin and creatinine excretion rates”. Neurotoxicology. Mol Cell Biochem. .“Chronic neurobehavioral effects of elemental mercury in dentists”.40: 467-73. 1983 Sep.Langworth et al.S. Chemother.“The enigma of parkinsonism in chronic borderline mercury intoxication. Science. “Evidence of delayed neurotoxicity produced by methyl mercury developmental exposure”. Univ.Alymbaevaet al. 1986. and Neurotoxicology and Teratology. Dept.A.Kanerva et al. 15 SuppI 4: 125-5 1. (259) C. (265) K. ~583-96. “Interaction of heavy metals with the nitric oxide synthase”. of Pathology. 15(6): 391-6. MOV (250) Disord. (262) Chang LW. Fredriksson et al. 20(3): 195-229. enzymes and basic indices of peripheral blood erythrocytes from workers chronically exposed to erythrocyte vapors.D. 1982. 10(4): 315-23.S. NY. “Exposure to mercury vapor and impact on health in the dental profession in Sweden”. Spring.Nagatsu et al.Lohmann et al. 133(252) B. 49(11):782-790. 1996.74(2):21 O-l 5. 8: 1. 1997. Environ Res 1977. “Effects of tyrosine ’ administration on serum bipterin In patients with Parkinson’s Disease and normal controls”. The activity of 1997. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1993. Rice. (263) H.

“mercury induced immune complex glomerulopathy”. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg (B). & T. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Cologne. Neurotoxicology 1995 Winter.. & U.Robinson et al. & ._NaturheiIverfahren/patinf. (27% U.cdc. 1995. Chap 4. 50:187-194. 1996. “Mercury concentration in organs of contemporary Japanese”. B. 1986 & (d)J. (& (278) 38) EPA: In Risk Information System.G. development of mitochondrial membrane permeability. 1992. 1989. Department of Health and Human Services. Environ Res. 14(3):539-53. & Immunotoxicol. J hnmun. Mercury Health Effects Update. Ind Health. & (g) El-Fawai HA. Marsh DO. & R. 1989.1982. Pediatriya (27% Akusherstvoi Ginekologiya.Nebenfuhrer et al. 3272-3276. & “Quecksilber-Mobiliztion durch DMPS bei Personen mit und ohne Amalgamfullungen”. 109(3): 469471. 1984. and loss of reductive reserve”. Castoldi AF..A. J Toxic01 Environ Health 1993. .33(6):56-58. Monitoring methyl mercury during pregnancy: maternal hair predicts fetal brain exposure. & (267) L.Gesundheitswesen. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. Biocompatibility of Metals in Dentistry. “Quecksilberverkonzentration im Urin nach DMPS” in [Status Quo and Perspectives of Amalgam].html.199( 1):24-37.S. & P. Sept 1980. http:/ /home.atsdr.Eggleston. “Studies of organ (273) mercury content related to number of amalgam fillings”. Sept 96.Weber.Numberg.& (f)Cossi et al. of Toxic Trace Metals. & T. Sept 1984.4:69-75.1982 & Transplantation Proceedings. JADA.Friberg et al.. “Induction of apoptosis in human T-cells by methyl mercury”. Germany. p 6 l-69. Environmental Protection Agency.79( 17): 1866-l 868. “Effect of dental amalgam and nickel alloys on T-lymphocytes”. & Tan XX. (272) 1999. Aug 1984. Contact Dermatitis. Brim. 38(2): 159-70. De Feo A.J. http://www. EPA. 1986.. NIDRADA Workshop. Arch Toxicol. 30:488-494. Waterman SJ. 1992. “Mercury in the brain and CNS in relation to amalgam fillings”. L. & O.t-online. IgA-IgG disease in the intestines of rats ingesting HgCl”. & Q “Conjunctivitis sicca(dry eye study)“. L. D. 1984.482(a)C.htm” BJ Shenker. L.S. 1998. Stuttgart.Hirsch et al. VanDendergen.1984. Arch Environ Health. “Alternative treatment of Multiple Schlerosis. Brewer R. &(b) PAndres.J.Mikhailova et al.1971 (276) ATSDIUEPA Priority List for 1999: Top 20 Hazardous Substances. “The hair-organ relationship in mercury concentration in contemporary Japan”. 1995. 1993. & “Low-level MeHg exposure causes human T-cells to undergo apoptosis: evidence of mitochondrial disfunction”.J Prosthet Dent. Immunopharmacol lmmunotoxicol. 1O(2): 12 lJ.M.. “Influence of occupational factors on disease of reproductive organs”. 4 l(1): 60-l. “Beneficial effect of human therapeutic IV-Ig in mercury induced autoimmune disease”Clin Exp Immunol. Toxic Appl (269) Pharmacology.Duuet et al. Of Erlamgem.Matsuo et al. & J of the American Medical Assoc. EPA. 1994. 124(3):2 1 l-24. 1997. 1991.S.W. “Hg allergy .Symposium paper. & J.Schiele et al. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. or Cancer”.2548.1986(Swedish Medical Journal). Institute for Naturopathic Medicine.86:159-169. Berlin M. N.“Hazardous burden by country” R.Institute for Naturopathic Medicine. Costa Lg. Toxicology. Clarkson TW.1 6(4):705-l 0: & M. 173( l-2 :45-62. 1(4):214-2 17. Institute of Occupational Medicine. Neuroimmunotoxicolog: Humoral Assessment of Neurotoxicity and Autoimmune Mechanisms. p3.Gonzalez et el. & Cemichiari E. Bioloeical Monitorino. (& 38). Zahnarztl.44(5): 298-303.J. New York. 8~ U. &(c) F. ~36-66.157( 1):23-35. 1996.Kleber. 1994. 1986. (266) .S. “Glomerulonephritis induced by heavy metals”. Arzt und Umwelt. “Mercuric compounds inhibit human monocyte function by inducing apoptosis: evidence for formation of reactive oxygen species(ROS). GeorgThieme Verlag.. (266 cases) & (b) “Amalgam (271) and Allergy”. Biological Monitoring and Surveillance. Contact Dermatitis. Environ Health. March 12. U. Lakartidningen. & K. “Study on the normal mercury concentrations of human organs”. “The Marburg Amalgam Study”.Weening et al.1966. Institute for Naturopathic Medicine 1997 (40 MS cases). 14(3):555-77. 1984. Apr.77(2):149-l 59. Contact Dermatitis 1999.48(4):22 l-9. Clin Immun Immunopath.T. (270) 5 1(5):6 17-623. & (e)J Immun. Hazardous Air Pollutant Hazard Summary Fact Sheets.Schiele et al. “Mercuric chloride induced anitnuclear antibodies In mice”.. . Vol XlV(3). Myers GJ. 83(7):5 19(274) 52 1. 136(9):3277-3281. Mitt. Effects of inorganic and organic mercury on intracellular calcium levels in rat T lymphocytes. 137(g). Friberg(ed.).Insug et al.“. Tang C.J. Suzuki et al. 1005. Univ. 1981. Apr. Vol 1. 1975. (268) 1980.Epidemiology of .Suzuki et al. R.Schmid et al.136(9). “Mercury in human hair.58(6):322-3 1. Shamy MY.

S. et al. Experientia.34( 19):3405-13 . & Endo T. 28:1455-1456. -1970. 1998. Inst. Bioprobe Newsletter. sulfhydryl reagents and other chemical agents on striatal D2 dopamine receptors. "Deaths from 281 Selected Causes. Langolf GD.24(5):65 l-9 . 1985. Table l-26.R.88( l-3):221 -6. “Transfer of metallic mercury into the fetus”. Toxicol Lett 1996 Nov.“Behavioral consequences of in utero exposure to mercury vapor in squirrel monkeys”. Simpson et al.74(2):72-5. Clarkson et al. Reynolds IN. A. & M.27:2-3:7-14. 1987. 52:303-3 16. Chetty CS.64( 12): 1507.L. II. & K. & McKay SJ. Spain”. “Influence of mercury on uptake of dopamine and norepinephrine”. Queiroz et al. www. S.. IO(5):377-84.A. & Science News. Lancet Ott 7.&Vital Statistics of the U. Dental Assoc. Elemental mercury exposure: peripheral neurotoxicity. I994. Jan 1988.Albers et al. Effects of mercury compounds on the spontaneous and potassium-evoked release of (3Hldopamine fi-om mouse striatial slices.Perlingeiro et al. National Institute of Mental Health. Repeated neurobehavioral investigations in workers .S. Mercury inhibits Na-K-ATPase primarily at the cytoplasmic . Br J Ind Med.200O. & (g) Levine SP. Validity of Hair Anlysis for Diagnosis of Mercury Status.afier exposure to mercury vapor”. Swedish Council for Planning and Coordinating Research (FRN). Int J Biochem 1983. & Moosmayer M.I 34(2):32 l-325 2000.vI 07:44 I -. 0ct.C. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1995 & Chuang D. Lai et al. ~276. 1992. and alkali metal ions. 1966. & (e)M.Airey. Racz WJ. 98(5):291-6.. Arch Int Physiol Biochem 1990. J Appl Toxicol. T.32(2): 157-80. 1O-3 l-98.W. & Moore G. Surgeon General Report. Mercury uptake by primary cultures of rat renal cortical epithelial cells. & (d)P. & 0 L.. Neurosurgery. Public Health Service.. & D. Br J Ind Med 1983. Harris L. death 2000 R. “Neurological abnormalities associated with remote occupational elemental mercury exposure”. J. 1972. Rat brain (Na+-K+)ATPase: modulation of its ouabain-sensitive K+-PNPPase activity by thimerosal. ~262. I6( 12): IO l l-7. 126( 1):6-l 5. Idel H. 1998. Environmental Research..Ann Neurol 1988. “Lithium treatment protects neurons in CNS corn glutamate induced excitability and calcium influx”. Sakata M. “Use of hair analysis for evaluating mercury intoxication of the human body”. Nov I I.Ahlbom et al. Sci Total Environ 1983.Hua et al. “Effects of low exposure to inorganic mercury on psychological performance”. of Mental Health.40(4):225-g.Katz et al. Muller F. Rajanna B. et al. Nat. & Scheuhammer AM.Hobson & B.Greenwood et al. R. ~164. 1994.bioprobe.Smith et al. Pharmacol Toxicol. Neonate. Hobson M.I 5( 1):5-7.14. 139: 374-386.C. 19 February. Int J Immounopharmacology”. Of Health. “Sensitivity of MS detections by MRI”. “Mercury distribution in neonatal cortical areas . “Mortality of New England Dentists”.Rajanna. “Polymorphonuclear phagentosis in workers exposed to mercury vapor”. Et al. Journal of Neurology. Newland et al. Bethesda Md. statistics from 31 states. 1996. 1996. “Effect of exposure to elemental mercury on short term memory”. 8c B. Mercury in human hair: a review” Environmental Health Perspectives. Vo1292. 1972.60(3):339-34 1.. March 8. & “Total mercury concentrations in human hair form I3 countries”. & (f) Gunther W. 158:309. U. Mar 3. Race Statistics.40(4):413-9. & U. and Psychiatry. Arch Environ Health. Biological monitoring of mercury vapor exposure by scalp hair analysis in comparison to blood and urine. & Hum Exp Toxic01 1995. dental nurses. Effects of heavy metal cations. 3-14-98. & Anner BM. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1986. 1986. halide ions. “Suicide among Swedish Dentists”. Neurotoxicology 1996.. 1994. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. Science News. 14(3):28 l-6. and brain tumors”. & Science News. Vol95(5):2642-2647.J. Dept.Warfiinge et al. & S.. Biochem Pharmacol 1985 Ott 1.67: 196-208. Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology. Of Amer. Toxic01 Letters. “Suicide rates of Iowa dentists”. by Age.1994.S.W. Biol. & “Prolonged behavioral effects of in utero exposure to methyl mercury or lead”. Stockholm.Nonaka et al. “Transport of elemental mercury into fetal tissues”. Br J Ind Med 1982 May. M. Ware L. Effects of cadmium and mercury on Na(+)K(+)ATPase and uptake of 3H-dopamine in rat brain synaptosomes.Glass.39(2): 136-9. 1996. & Wilhelm M. Brain Inj.J. National Center for Health 15(4):243-6. Press Release. British Medical Journal. 17(3-4):605-14. and Sex. Stand J Sot Med. & M.S.Soleo et al. M.(280) (281) (282) (283) (284) (28% (286) (287) (288) residents of Madrid. Albers JW. 21:239-244. Cherian MG. & Ziff.B. & R. 1983. Dep 1985. Neurobiology.C. “Dentists. “Chronic elemental mercury intoxication”. Bowler K. Effects of pH. 12(2): 79-84. & (b) J. Cavender GD. Lewis RN. Shaikh ZA.. 47(2): 105-9.Arnetz et al. Washington D. 1990.

Alternative Med Rev. . Echeverria et al. 1985. & “Amalgam: zeitbombe in mund?“. & and Health. Neural Transm. Thiol cells. cellular distribution and DNA damage produced by mercuric chloride in a human fetal hepatic cell line.43:163-l 77.E.l8(2):89-101.Chronic Fatigue Fibromvalnia U. & Harrison’s Principles Of Internal Medicine.104(3):209-214. IADR Abstracts #2 17. Philadelphia. Cleveland..72:939-946. Kilicarslan MA. 137(S): 472. 12( 11):971-980.1976: P.. (291) H.l977. Zahnmedizin. No. 117-28 & L. “Effect of selenium on mercury vapor released from dental amalgams”. & Kedici SP. 1989. Sarkar et al. “Mercury vaporization from corroded dental amalgam” Dental Materials. & N. Perils of mercury. . & K.Verschaeve et al. Acta Neuropathol(Berlin).Moberg. 1977.1992. 1988. & M.“Genetic damage induced by mercury exposure”.Sarkar. “Amalgamation reaction of Dispersalloy Reexamined”. Monatsschr. Chang LW. H. 1985. & L. 1.1992. “Corrosion products from dental alloys”.Sarkar et al. & N.Mai et al. & Snyder RD.Huggins. &Poisoning & Toxicoloev Compendium. 1996.. ZWR.B. 262(5 Pt2):F84308.1994. J. Lichtenberg. 1976. Swed Dent J. Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft nbH. J.Mateer et al.25( 10):800-S C. Uptake. W. N.Huggins & TE Levy. H.Mayer et al. Bennett & Plum. & Environmental Illness. “Mercury vapor in the oral cavity in relation to the number of amalgam fillings and C-9) chronic mercury poisoning”.htm (295) Cecil Textbook of Medicine. 1999. p 69.4:89-93. Aksut AA. 1993.Dorffer. 1998. . Neurotoxic effects of mercury. 1998. IADR Abstracts. et al. 105(4):213-218 & 105(5):280-283.E. Aug 1998.. IADR Abstracts # 356. 1972. J Dent Res. Methylquecksilber. 1978. Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research. “Cerebrospinal fluid protein changes in MS after Dental amalgam removal”.Schneider et al. 6(2):57-61. Robert L. et al.Daunderer. Res. Aug 1998.“A study of the release of mercury vapor from different types of amalgam alloys”. 1990. & “Anorexia Hydragyra: . & N. 3(4):295-300. #358. Kinderheilkd. ~65-71. 1989 Apr-Jun.20(2):122-38 and 20(4):316-34. & Sunderman FW. 14(3):329-73. Am J Physiol 1992.423( l-2):65-72. Lachmann PJ. Gokdemir K.Gebhardt. 1982. “Comparative in vitro cytogenetic studies in mercury-exposed low level lymphocytes”. “Risikobestimmung der Amalgambelastung”. 391-403. Ermittlung der Quecksilberbelastung aus Amalgamfullumgen.“. Lexi-Comp. & JGD Birkmayer et al. & Comprehensive Psychiatry.E. (292) M. Source Mol Toxicol. involvement in the inhibition of DNA repair by metals in mammalian human 2:2. Quecksilber. 105( 1):59-68.Gradl et al.y. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1988 Mar-Apr. Envir Res. 157(2-3):22 l-6. Leikin and Palouchek. Labormedizin 16. Inc. 3 1.35( 1): 122-37. (300) 1998. 14th Ed. 87-94. “Long term corrosion studies of amalgams and Casting alloys in contact”. & R.. Biological Trace Element Research.K. & A. 8~ A.Berglund. Toomvali. & Histochemical study on (301) the localization and distribution of mercury in the nervous system after mercury intoxication.W.Hock et al. C. 1972. Published Dissertation. “Neurobehavioral effects from exposure to dental amalgam: new distinctions Amalgam between recent exposure and Hg body burden” FASEB J. “Increased blood mercury levels in patients with Alzheimer’s’s disease”.depression. Muta Res. 1977. (296) L. Stuttgart.S. 199 1. Die Quintessenz 45.Bucio et al. 1993. 12:306-l 0. 1996. 18: 15-23. Rupp et al. “Mercury release from Dispersalloy amalgam”. IADR Abstracts # 895. in Akute und chronische Toxizitat von Snurenelemente. Acta Odontal Stand 1985. 1994. ~297-307.. 11:2. 20th Ed. Mutat Res 1999 Jan 25. (293) H. pp. Siblerud. Vol.Verschaeve. “Studies of mercury vapor emission from different dental amalgam alloys”. 1995. McGraw-Hill. (289) (290) . Moberg.A. 1979. Saunders and Company. 1998. & L.l990.40 http://www. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine. 1S(6)... ZWR.Mayer. Exp Neurol. Environ. IADR Abstracts #240. “Zur Ermittlung de Quecksilberfreisetzung aus Amalgamfullungen”.24:109-117. Psychometric evidence that dental amalgam mercury may be an etiological factor (294) in manic depression. & R. J Oral Rehabil 1998 Oct. 13..B. D. p197-. Klin Lab 38. ~~595-598. IADR Abstrats. & Ultrastructural studies of the nervous system after mercury intoxication.Schiwara. Bayramoglu G.Psanas et al. & (297) N.K. Stockholm.side. First Quarter 1998. &V. Biol. in Korpermaterial von Amalgamtrager”. Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine. 1143-l 152. Corrosion behavior of dental metals and alloys in different media. & D. LIU-IFM-Kemi(298) EX 150.Boyer. “Quecksilberdepots im Organismus korrelieren mit der Anzahl der Amalgamfullungen”. Burton Goldberg. & Editors of Alternative Medicine Digest. Future Medicine Publishing. & L. 1988.

76(4):9. 1995. What Your Doctor May Not Tell (312) You About Hormones. 85:96-108. Acta (311) Neuropathol (Berl) 1972. Toxicology & Applied Pharmacology 1993. N.20( 1): 67-78.. Dental Assoc. 114(1):9-12.Marsh et al. & Prenatal and neonatal toxicology and pathology of heavy metals” Adv Pharmacol Chemother. “Systemic autoimmune disease induced by mercuric chloride”. 1:86-91. Dissertation. The Kev to Ultimate Health. der Kassenarzt. M. 15(1):87-I 12. & J. 6: 2472-2476. “The effect of mercury vapor on cholinergic (305) neurons in the fetal brain. .L.V. Vol 16( I). “Systemic autoimmunity due to mercury vapor exposure in genetically susceptible mice”. Soderstrom S. Pendergrass JC.. (3 17) SZinecker. Bagentose et al. 1996. The Tribune. (3 19) H. & (b) Motorkina.“Immunotoxicology of mercury and cadmium on B-lymphocytes”. (800-31 l-6265) (3 13) V. . IAOMT Conference & tape. (Paul Mills. hnmunol Res. Slevin JT. & Toxicol Lett 1995.17( 11): I2 15-1221. 1998. 1999. “Physical and mental problems attributed to dental amalgam fillings”. “An Ultrastructural study on the blood-brain barrier dysfunction following mercury intoxication”.Aposhian et al. “Mobilization of Mercury in Humans by DMPS”. Volozhin Al. Of Pathology. Chang LW. 1991 . 32(4):23.Shenker et al. 1995. Of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine.Daum.M. 59:32-4 1. Toxic Substances Journal. 99(1-2): 23-35. 75( I-3): 133-44. 2000. Fredriksson A.Immunology Today. “Mercury from Maternal Silver Tooth Fillings: a source of neonatal exposure”. “Immunotoxic effects of mercuric compounds on human lymphocytes and monocytes: Alterations in B-cell function and viability” Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. Nordic J of (309) Biological Med.Oliveira et al.Acta Neurolpathol(Berlin). 122 (2): 273-80. 1980.D.12(2):41.Siblerud.l992.Malt et al. DAMS. Biological (304) Trace Element Research.Utt. & Kyle BP.Engin-Deniz et al. Brain Research & Developmental Brain Res. Univ. (321) R. Of Clinical Immunology. & “Urinary Mercury after Administrationof DMPS”. 13 Apr 1998.Goldman et al. Stomatologiiia(Mosk): 1997. Duhr EF. 15(3):383-94.“Chemically induced autoimmunity .O. “Amalgam: Quecksilberdamfe bis ins Gehim”. 1993.L. Ann Neural. 1998. AZ. (320) U.“Mercury Breath”. 1997. 1995. Int J Immunophannacol.3 l-40. 199Ob. Zeitschrift fur Stomatologie. & J.. “Comparison of neurite outgrowth with neurotilament protein levels In neuroblastoma cells following mercuric oxide exposure”.F. 1990. & K.Daunderer(Germany) of MS patients after amalgam removal”. 1999.Joumal of Calif. Frankfurt.D.M..Lee(MD). 1992..Kubicka-Muranyi et al. “The relationship between mercury from dental amalgam and the cardiovascular system”. Aug.“. (310) Science of the Total Envir. Abdulla et al. J.V. “Fetal Methyl mercury Poisoning”. A.. “Mercury effects on the contractile activity of the heart muscle”. R. &“Mercury-induced autoimmunity”. E.Sorenson et al.. (3 14) M.30(3): 21 I-214.1997. “Hg release from amalgam fillings into oral cavity”.“Die queckssilberkonzentration im spichel zehnjariger kinder in korrelation zur anzahl und Grobe iher amalgamfullungen”. “Prenatal methyl mercury exposure as a cardiovascular risk factor at 7 years of age” (308) Epidemiology. 1998. “Relationship between dental amalgam and health”. 1992. & E. . 89:471-179.7:348-55. “large study by M.& L.. 132(2):299-309. Envir. Barer GM. 22(5): 362-3. Mesa.97( I-3): 23-38.l2:223-.Vimy et al. Warfyinge et al. Psychosomatic medicine. Clin Exp Pharmocol Physiol.“Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in experimental mercury intoxication”. “Mercury induced autoimmunity in humans”. 109( 1): 1 l-20. 1984. FASEB J. Chang LW. & Ware RA. (315) B. 17: 195-23 1..(302) D.l996. Haley BE: HgEDTA complex inhibits GTP interactions with the E-site (307) of brain beta-tubulin.1994. Ebendal T.Stejskal et al.Siblerud. 1980. Supp 4. Burkholder PM. 10(4):370-4: & D. Clin Exp Immunol. (1800 patients) (3 18) V. “Untersuchungen . Richard Hanson. Der Allgermeinarzt. 1995. (303) H. 1999. & Toxicology. Dept. 56: I43-52. (3 16) B.R.21(3): 179-84. & M. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. Vol 106. “Mercury-specific Lymphocytes: an indication of mercury allergy in man”. Toxicol Appl (306) Pharmacol.J.. 1995.M.1 I. Apalachee Junction) . Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1974. Klinghardt.Schneider..“. “Praxiproblem Amalgam”. a>M.M. Hartmann HA. Health Perspectives.J. Dencker L. 1976. 1993.

M. Waley P. J. 1991.Separatdruckaus Schweiz.Dallmann. 1996.82:324-237 & Neurosci Letters.l998. MD. 49(2): 6-10. “Plasma cysteine and sulphate levels in patients with Motor neurone disease. & Neukirchen (clinic)(Germany.159(2): 121-6. 41: 29-43. 1990. & “Relationship between amalgam fillings and oral cavity health” Ann Dent. (86 cured) (322) P. 15: 108994.“Metal-induced diseases of the nervous system”. Traces of mercury in organs from primates with amalgam fillings. 1966. allergology.10:425-444. Issue 2. Su et al. vol 108(8). Muscle Nerve 1992.Br J Hosp Med. Muscle Nerve. 1994. & J. SS Tsyganok. 1998. Localization of mercury in CNS of the Rat. Stockholm. Kohdera. Neurotoxicology. Neurosci Lett.Watanabe et al. cases paid by insurance companies in Germany. Prog Histochem Cytochem. Danscher. 1990. Candura et al. owns 2 Clinics. 1996. Vol I. 17(3-4): 735-4 1. J Orthomolecular Med. & (e) Pamphlett et al. “Localization of mercury in the CNS”. 41:29-43. & Heavy Metal Bulletin. Environ Res. 1991. 27(4):667-71.M. 23:249-255. “Mercury Deposits in Neurons of the Trigeminal Ganglia ARer Insertion of Dental Amalgam in Rats”. APMIS 1999 Mar. Der Allgremeinarzt. “Patterns of antigenic expression in human glioma cells”. & P. 41(5): Suppl 2. Amino & G. (325) B. J Neural Sci. Biol Med. (326) E. “Effects of mercuryic chloride and methyly mercury on cholinergic neuromusular transmission”. “Mercury and MS”. Ott 1994.107(3):303-10 (328) P. Environmental Research.. “Is multiple sclerosis a mercury allergy?“. “Motor Neuron Uptake of Low Dose Inorganic Mercury” Neurotoxicology 1996. J Neural Sci. Bangsi. . 115:29-32. Selective involvement of large motor neurons in the spinal cord of rats treated with methyl mercury. Arvidsson J. Schwermetallbelastung bei atopisher dermatitis and psoriasis. Pharmacol Toxic01 1997.“Abnormal Liver Enzyme Metabolism in Parkinson’s”. June 1994. Johansson K.Pean et al.Nord med Ark Stockholm 1880 xii no 17 l-48 1 pl & P. Parkinson’s Disease.McKeever et al. 6:119-147. Exp Mol Pathol 1990. 156(l): 12-7. 15( 10) fax: 0049 9947 IO 51 11 (324) D. “Pathways of cysteine metabolism in MND/ALS”. & Arvidson B. (I 60 3 1 Higashitakada-cho cases cured-eczema). 1995. Tsunetoshi Kohdera. (9): 67-69. 20:22262220. Ghadirian P et al. “Unithiol in treatment of dermatoses”. &(g) Schionning JD. “Dental amalgam and multiple sclerosis”. Director. 1998. Rungby J. Suppl:59-61. 1992. & M. “Beobachtungen uber die gesundheit vor und nach amalgamentfemug”. Mibu Nakagyo-ku Schimazu Clinics Kyoto 604 Japan e-mail:smc-inet@mbox.87:461-. & “Sur un cas de mercurialisme 98:1-19. B.Dermatol. 216. & M. & S. 1986. “interaction of mercury compounds with muscarinic receptor subtypes in the rat brain”. “Entry of low doses of mercury vapor into the nervous system”. 1089-94. 1982.Coote P . Faculty of Dentistry. Neurological Sciences 135: 63-67 (1996). (329) Arvidson B. chronique simulant la sclerose en plaque”. Horsted-Bindslev P. 1993.Baasch. Osaka Univ.globalpoint. “umweltgifie und multiple sklerose”.“kon nen durch Quecksilber entstehen? PeDa-Eigenverisg.(75 cases amalgam removal) http://soho. 1 lO(l-2).or.Heafield et al. Mauch et al. 80(5): 2 18-24. Madsen. & (I) Pamphlett R. Le Quesne.52(3):291-9. J neural Sci. Email: Spezialklinik-Neukirchen@toolpool. (rats & primates).. Acta Neural Stand. & Moller. & (c) “Ultrastructural localization of mercury after exposure to mercury vapor”. 124. & Castoldi AF et al. Ionescu. Tanner et al. Clausen. & A. 1978. (2): 65-68.28:534(327) (a)G. near (these clinics use MELISA test for diagnosis of immune reactivity) Czech border). 1986.5(2): 95106. (330) C. EAACI.Engel. 1998. 19(1):39-47. Danscher G. Schweiz arch Neural Neurochir Psichiatr. Vestn. & “Effects on health following removal of dental amalgams”. “Autometallographic inorganic mercury correlates with degenerative changes in dorsal root ganglia of rats intoxicated with organic mercury”. 1990. &(b) Danscher G. Arvidson(Sweden). 1998. Acta Neural Stand. Crit Rev Neurobiology. “Oxidative damage to nucleic acids in motor neurons containing Hg”. “Retograde axonal transport of mercury in primary sensory neurons” 1990. Arvidson et al. & E. 1991. Monatsschr Zahnm. International Congress of Allergology and Clinical significant improvement) (323) Dr. &c(d) Pamphlett R. International J of Epidemiology.Diagnose und Therapie. Biometals. Danscher et al. 89-92. Aug. 7 (3) ~261-263 1994. Inorganic mercury is transported from muscular nerve terminasl to spinal and brainstem motomeurons. 15(2): 143-50 & M. Inorganic mercury is transported from muscular nerve terminals to spinal and brainstem motomeurons. dermatology. Gruia Ionescu. and Alzheimer’s’s Disease”.

of Toxicology & Chemistry. 1997. “Speciation of mercury excreted in feces from individuals with amalgam fillings”. U. Oskarsson A. (338) (a)W.L. and cadmium: A Public Health Perspective”. Schulz C. Lindvall A. Of Food Engineering and Biotechnology. National Institute for Working Life.J. Br J Rheumotol. Sept 17 1988. Research. (343) P. & Semczuk M. Effect of mercuric acetate on selected enzymes of maternal and fetal hamsters” Environmental Research. 14( 1):37-44. Modifications of Ca2+ signaling by inorganic mercury in PC12 cells. Arch Environ Health..l998. 36(5):237-9. Neuroendocrinology Letters. Toxicology 1999 Ott I. “Calcium channels as target sites of heavy metals”.7(2):332-340 (339) H.G. Haifa. 52(2):134-g. 1992. & M. Xenobiotic metabolism in motor neuron disease. Karp et al.S. 1997.Monestier et al. of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1992. 8~Neurology 1990. Ersson B. Yaqob A et al.“lnhibition of calcium transport by Hg salts” in rat cerebellum E. (334) T. Toxicolozv of Metals. Dermatitis. 1996. Dept.Boadi et al. Hypersensitivity phenomena and the kidney: role of drugs and environmental agents. (340) Herrman M. 1992.Y. “MELISA: A New Technology for Diagnosing and Monitoring of Metal Sensitivity”. & P. & Cell Mol Neurobiol 1994 Dec. 1993.Urbach et al. 1999. Ann Rheum Dis. & L. L. (344) G. 1985 Feb (337) H. 57( 1):96-106.(331) C. Hudecek R. 1997. et al. J Appl toxicol.449-51. “Correlation of human placental enzymatic activity with trace placenta”.25-6. Pharmacol. & (b)J. et al. 738(2): 257-64. 1992. “Factors affecting internal mercury burdens among German children”. & D. Toxic01 Ind Health. 1992. & P. “Breast-feeding exposure of infants to mercury. Szucs et al. Metalspecific memory lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man.20(3):233-8.S. lead. Cell Struct Funct 1995 Jun. Nordman V. & & Steventon GB. 1996. Am J Kidney Dis. Semczuk-Sikora A.194(3):27 1-9 1. “Abnormal sulphur oxidation in systemic lupus erythrmatosus(SLE)“. & metal concentration in W.Gordon et al.Yallapragoda et al.R. “Mercury burden from amalgam fillings”..Soleo et “Mitochondrial calcium and cerebral cortex”. “Effects of Hg2+ and CH3Hg+ on Ca2+ fluxes in the rat brain”.J Biol Chem.318-20. “In vitro effect of mercury on enzyme activities and its accumulation in the first-trimester human placenta”.339:8784.6(1):69-75. 1988.Bigazzi. Med Sci Monit 2001 Mar. “Lymphocytes transformation induced by inorganic and organic mercury”.l996. Wichmann HE. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 51:3. A. Nov. Wjst M.Freitas et al. Gale TF et al. Environ Res.Busselberg.82-83:255-61.& “In vitro exposure to mercury and cadmium alters term human placental membrane fluidity”. Hill. p 644-47. 13:470.. 77(2): 124-9. & Rossi AD. 1994. (333) A.html) (336) G. & P. “Patch test materials for mercury allergic contact dermatitis”. 49(5): 466-73. 1998.Stejskal. “Pathophysicological roles of calreticulin in autoimmune disease”. “Influence of amalgam fillings on urinary mercury excretion”(S. (332) Trepka MJ. et al. “Drug Associated glomerulopathies” Toxic01 Pathol. 116(l): 17-23.Chavez et al. Baltimore. Haifa. et al. 1992. lnt Arch . Dec.3(4):379-86. (335) A. 1998. “The mercury concentration in breast milk resulting from amalgam fillings and dietary habits”. 29(3): 723-30. & Sundberg J. Environ Res. 3 1:7. Abadin. Maryland. 1998 (www. Popescu M. and Hg in particular) and Mg status during pregnancy. Rambam Medical Center. Krause C. Lonnerdal B. New data on toxic metal intoxication (Cd. & release by Hg+2”. “Contact stomatitis”. ~835-52.. “Autoimmunity induced by metals”. Proceedings: 33rd Annual Meeting of American Academy of Environmental Medicine. 164(4): 325-30.B. Engqvist et al. (342) V. 1995. 1999. “Effect of inorganic mercury on in vitro placental nutrient transfer and oxygen consumption”. Lancet. G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 1998. 263:8. Arch Environ Health. Israel.14(6):675-87.Caron et al. 3582-. European J Immunology. 40:1095-98. “Poor sulphoxidation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis”. T-I lnst of Tech. 1997.Emory et al.Eggleton et al. 137(3): 169-84.1977.niwl.Jtaly). Stand J lmmunol.. Dept. Pb. 16(4):314-9. ATSDR. Stockholm Univ. 20: 289-98. Heinrich J.Nguyen et al. & Stejskal VDM. Reprod Toxicol. 53(3):205-13. 1986..Toxicol Lett..477.17(3): 273-8. & Dept. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 36:35 l-358. FASEB J 1993. The Lancet. Danersund A.A. 13(4): 495-5 17.Emory et al. & Adler SG. Schweinsberg F.Drexler et al. Brain 1996. CRC Press Inc. Protein binding of mercury in milk and plasma from mice and man--a comparison between methyl mercury and inorganic mercury.20(2): 7581 . Israel. in Chang.Nakada et al. Mol Immunol.Tosti et al. Lewis Publishers.7:1507-14. (34 1) A.& 0 Karp W. 1997. Environ Res. & (d) Boot JH. Effects of SH-blocking compounds on the energy metabolism and glucose uptake in isolated rat hepatocytes. & P. Semin Cutan Med Surg. & T.

Lechner.1983.Allgem. Therapeutikon. & (353) P. & M. Akush. 22(3): 130-9 (358) N. Martinez R. Allgem.12( 1): 126-3 1. Z. glutamate. Fibromyalgia.13 (348) A Kistner.und Metalloidintoxikation-2.Bohmer et al. 1985.Schaeffer et al. Mineraloscope.Behnke. “Jugendicher starb an Amalgam”.1996. & W.Amold. :Toxische Untersunchungen zu Amalgam”. 39-4 1. & “lmmunschaden durch Toxine” Argumente+Fakten der Medizin. Denmark. Diagnose und Therapie der Metall. Forum Prakt. Vrach. 271: 93-96. 30(2):62-3. & (b)Nixon.Umweltmedizin 1997. Shtelmakh et al. 44:369-78.Oster et al. & N.. (356) M. Issue 4. Mussmann GV. & P. Lauwerys RR. 1996. Dtsch. “Risikofaktor Amalgam-Ein Problemstoff’. organic. Zahnmed. Der Naturarzt. Arzt. 1989. “Wie problematisch ist der . Sbom. Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed 1996. Arch. & J. Ginekol 1977. Die Zahn Arztwoche. Arzt. 1996.1978. Scheicher. 1991. Der Artikulator(30): 11-12. 1990.3 I (5):905.“. “OkopadiatrieVerbindung zur Naturheilkunde”. 1994. 22:367-80. Universitat Karlsruhe.“Comparative treatments of rheumatoid arthritis”. 1970. 105(10): 586-569 & Therapie der Schwermetallbelastung. 36(4): 272-78. Z.V.( 1):22-23. 134:669-72. 37:76-87. (346) Clauw DJ. Acta Histochem Suppl 1980. 1991. &(c) Villegas J. & Diagnostik un Monitorung vonSchwermeta1lbelastungen. (347) G. 1979.Kostler.Arzt. Forum Prakt.& N.Legrum.( 12):50-3. “Study on the significance of mercury accumulation in the brain from dental fillings through direct mouth-nose-brain transport”. “Kompendium Umweltmedizin”. 29(11): 294 (357) S. Toxicol. 1999. Delo. phenylmercury acetate.B. DE. 1992 (360) Buchet JP. (359) G.Allgen. (355) W. 1995. 1977. “Disintoxication therapy of patients with nonspecific inflammatory diseases of the female genital organs”. Moyer TP. alteration by mercury”. “The relationship between &E-mediated and cell-mediated hypersensities”.Halbach et al. Histochemical changes in the neurosecretory hypothalic nuclei as a result of an intoxication with mercury compounds.H. 72: -4551. (1): 37. Schweinsberg. Die Quecksilberintoxikation. “Schwermetalle schadigen das Immunsystem”. “Kopfschmerz un Migrane: Schon mal an Amalgam gegcht?“. Hamburg. & L.H. ~596. 1972. or mercury vapor. 1996. 135(g): 13-l 5.Daunderer.62(Supp). 1992.Elhassani. Vrasch. & “Amalgamvergiftungmoglicher Zusammenhang mit angeborener Schwerhorlgkeit. “Treatment of patients with myocardial infarction”... and total mercury in blood and urine. (352) B. Bruck W.Benga “Water exchange through erythrocyte membranes” Neurol Neurochir Pol 1997 Sep-Oct. 1995. (4): 30-34.Delo. Der Allgemeinarzt. Influence of DMPS on the mobilization of mercury from tissues of rats pretreated with mercuric chloride.. Lett. & “Sulfhydryl-induced restoration of myocardial contractility after 1990. “Quecksilbervergiftung durch Amalgam: Diagnose und Therapie” ZWR.54(3):323-33 . Toxicol. Plzen.8(l): 8-14.A.P Guida. 7( 11): 492-496. 1996.Delo. amalgam 198(3): 275-91. The Glostrup Allergy Study.Lek. 1995. Die Amalgamvergiftung und ihre medizinische Folgen”. & W. (351) S. Andres A.Schleicher. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. Dissertation. Biol. Inorganic. & E. Heavy Metal Bulletin.Friese. Vrach. Gramza G. (350) F.. Forum Prakt. (10): 112-l 14.Dubinskii et al.D. 1989.(361) K. &(b) Maas C. “Morpholcial changes in the skin in Scleroderma after treatment with unithiol”. “Konnen Amalgamplomben angebomene lnnenohrschaden verusachen?“. (362) G.Daunderer.104(5):4 12-417. Arztezeitschr Naturheikunde. (11):665-. “Risk estimation of mercury intake from different sources”. 1992. Crespo D.5( 1):38. “The pathogenesis of chronic pain and fatigue syndromes: Fibromyalgia” Med Hypothesis. “Quecksilber-Mobilisation mit dem DMPS bei arztlichem und zahnarztljchem Persona] im Vergleich”. “Thiol chelators and mercury effects on isolated heart muscle”. 1993. (354) W. “Therputic efficacy of unithiol in Buschke’s Scleroderma”. Tapparo. & A. (349) M. and mercury. 05. British J of Dermatol. (1):49-52. (345) N. & O. 1995. 10(l): 17-22. Mineraloscope. & “Treatment of patients with chronic circulatory insufficiency” Kardiologila. Accumulation of mercury in neurosecretory neurons of mice after long-term exposure to oral mercuric chloride. “The many faces of methyl mercury poisoning”. Intensivmed. Toxicology 1989. Pzheusskaia. MediVerlagsgesellschaft.Bonnet. 1982(g): 875-9. Eigenschaften und Einsatzgebiete des Chelatbildners:DMPS”. 1996. (8): 36-38. “Beeinflubung der zellularen Immunabwehr drch Quecksilberfreisetzung”. “Die Pathobiochemie. Delo. Forum Medizin Verlagsgesellschaft. 17(l I): 1222-1223. Neurosci Lett 1999.Neuburger et al.I. 1996.I I Allergy.I.II.Nielsen et al.l982. 63(Supp 13) 349-352. Vrach.Klykov. J Anal Toxicol. 1995. 30(2): 44-66. & Kozik MB. “Quecksilberbelastung.ZWR.Schrifenreihe mweltmedizin. & Hanson S.

Mann AH. Zinke. Dentalwerkstoff Amalgam?“. 3(4):153-166. Hg2+. 4:285-294.W. Geburtshilfe Frauenheikd. & . and Cd2+ on some neurochemicals in rats. & (c) Gerhard I. Sbom.Reinhardt. &Brouwer M et al. Stejskal VDM et al. Prochazkova J.36(6): 627-28. 1982. Are cytokines associated with neuropsychiatric syndrome in humans? lnt J Immunopharm 1995. L. depletion of plasma tryptophan. ZahnarztLZ 1995. &(b) T. 1994. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1995. Tryptophan depletion causes a rapid lowering of mood in normal males.744 patients in 34 clinics) (377) Murtomaa H. in: Reproductive Toxicology. Sweden. Sonntag-Verlag. & H. 1999 (376) Melchart D. & Shukla GS. Eur J Oral Sci 1998. & Umweltmedizin in der Frauenheilkunde.298. Arztezeitschr. “Reproductive risks of heavy metals and pesticides in women”. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1998. 84(2): 113-22. 1995. Toxic01 Pathol 1999.. 1993. 20: 289-298. Naturheilkunde. 49: l-13. 1995. Dtsch. 1994. Danersund A. 10(2-3): 163-8. 1992. 47(5):41 l-18. 35(2):9-17. Med. 115(39): 1490-1494. “Amalgamvergiftung. (365) C. Weidenhammer W. (373) Marcusson IA. “Infertility with women by M. Kremers L. (380) Komaroff AL. Hudecek R. Stuttgart. Chandra SV.Gabard. 18:208-12. 27(4):441-7. Biochem Biophys Acta 1989. (368) Olin R. A multicenter survey of amalgam fillings and subjective complaints in non-selected patients in the dental practice. 6: 110-3. FMS. (379) MacDonald EM. Biochemistry.). and TMS. Burnout and its causes in Finnish dentists. Stuttgart. J Am Gerialr sot 1976. Paulander J. Buchwald DS. ACD. “Metal-specific lymphocytes: risk factors in CFS and other related diseases”. 1995. 1996. ~1-7. Medford FH. Toxic01 Lett 1982. & Delgado PL et al. Mood lowering effect of tryptophan depletion.). Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990. Kruse-Jarres(Ed. and the mechanism of antidepressant action. Daily vitamin C consumption and fatigability.CFS. 20:221-228. & (b)“Schdstoffe und Fertillitatsstorungen”. Karlstad. (370) Magos L. Schulte-Uebbing. (375) Stejskal VDM. 991(1):85-9. Psychopharmacology. R. Ann Rev Med 1998. “There are new realizations to the Amalgam problem”. 24:136-37. 1985.F.Prevalences in a Swedish County. & B. Haavio-Manila e. (369) Sterzl I. Metal-specific memory lymphocytes: biomarkers of sensitivity in man. Axelsson P. “Amalgam from gynacological view”. Adv Dent Res. 55(6): M63-M65. Estimation of mercury dose by a novel quantification of elemental and inorganic species released from amalgam. Interferons as mediators of psychiatric morbidity. 1999 Ju1. Nov 21. Lloyd A. Of Iowa College of Dentistry. “Mobiliztion of mercury using DMPS”. 10(5):3934 16. The Lancet 1978. The effects of dose of elemental mercury and first pass circulation time on organ distribution of inorganic mercury in rats. Vemey E. 52(7):383-396. Functional changes induced by heavy metal ions. in Status Quo and perspectiveves of Amalgam Other Dental Materials. environmental illnesses. Thomas HC. Toxicol Lett 1996. (363) J. Effects of neurotoxicants on synaptic transmission. 1992. autoimmunity. Schwermetalle und Mineralstoffe. 106:770-77 (6. Dtsch. Chronic fatigue syndrom: an update. “Umweltbedingte Frauenkranheiten”. Effect of interaction of Mn2+withZn2+. 68(Supp) 119. and (367)(a) Gerhard I.eine chronische Krankheit und ihre Therapie”.41(10): 628-633. (364) W. Wuhr E. 1993. 51(9): 68797. 167-83. 50(7): 506-10. & Hickie I.Hickel et al. 67(5): 295-300. Clarkson TW. 87(2): 173-77. Mercury and nickel allergy: risk factors in fatigue and Neuroendocrinology Letters 1999. & Smith KA et al. An oral examination based study. (372) Atchison WD. 349(9056):915-19. Arch Gen Psychiatry.Richardson(ed. New York. Geburtshilfe Frauenheikd. Erfahrungsheikunde 1992. Contact Dermatitis. 1998. Pscheidl. Ringsdorf Wm. 1175-78. VCH Weinhelm. & Young SN et al. Preventive Dental Health Care Center. Plzen Lek. (371) Halbach S. Kandolin 1. 39(4): 289. JD. Der Frauenarzt. 1993. “Side effects: mercury contribution to body burden from dental amalgam”. Lancet 1997.Cikrt et al. & Sidransky H.4I( 1):60-l (374) Benkelfat C et al. Hudson AR.). Relapse of depression after depletion of tryptophan. Arch Toxicol. Community Dental Oral Epidemiol 1990. Neuroendocrinology Letters.1990. Serotonin function. 51-68. & (d)Gerhard I. Friberg(Ed. & “Die Quecksilberbelastung von Zahnmedizinstudenten anch beruflicher Amalgaexposition. Neuroendocrinology Letters 1999. Univ. 1978. Wochenschr. (366) (a)“Tooth amalgam and pregnancy”. Influence of lead acetate and selected metal salts on tryptophan binding to rat hepatic nuclei. & Stejskal V. Mayer W. Georg=Thieme-Verlag. & M. Psychological and somatic subjective symptoms as a result of dermatological patch testing with metallic mercury and PHA. & ‘The frequency of mercury intolerance in patients with CFS and healthy controls”. Lindvall A. (378) Cheraskin E. 21(20): 2529-38. Bayer.

Markers of inflamation and immune activation in CFS. Allergology International 1997. (400) Kim J of Clin and Exper Neuropsych 1986. Liu WK. Koh R. Wibowo AA. In: Amalgam and Health: The Swedish Council for Planning and Research Coordination. Brain Behav Immun 1995. (391) Schumann K. Fucikova T. & & Baranski B. Environ Mol Mutagen 1996. inquiries @doctors data. Vnitr Lek 1999 Sep. 73: 1224-1234. 59: 551-7. Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi 27(7): 649-59. 8~581-93. Nordhagen HP. Heavy metal load with atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis. Lennart Mhsson International AB. 2:65-68. An epidemiological study of mercury sensitization. www. fodda sedan 1967. Evidence for impaired activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Women in dental surgeries: reproductive hazards in occupational exposure to . (381) Demitrack MA. (401) Sikorski R. 38(4): 170-9. J. (397) Hudecek R. Cur-r Top Environ Toxicol Chem 1985. & Dr. & Prochazkova J. lOl(supp1 2): 85-90. vol 79. 24~372-76. (386) Great Smokies Diagnostic Lab. (399) Herber RF. Immunogentic findings in patients with altered tolerance to heavy metals.metametrix. (382) Sterzl Danersund A. 6: 175. 63: 53-69. 82(I): 192-20. (395) Baranski B. (384) Kuklinski B. 17-21.K Sherman. 44: 456-60. (390) Ellingsen DG. Comblath DR.gsdl. Mexico. The toxicological estimation of heavy metal content(Hg. J Mol Gen Genet 1996. Pringsulaka P. ~78-84. The fatigue syndrome in autoimmune thyroiditis with polyglandular activation of autoimmunity. Int Archieves of Occup and Environ Health 1987. Prochazkova J. Cancoon. (398) Saengsirinavin C. Mercury contents in hair of dental personnel and evaluation of various agents suppressing mercury vaporization. study reported in Washington Star Newspaper. Blood 1993. Stejskal VDM. van der Star M. Inc. Aftenposton 6 mpv 1997. & Shapiro IM. J Dent Assoc Thai 1988. 32(4): 271-6. Zamrazil V. & Williams MV. 20:253-75.2 milj. Avd. &(d) Biospectron Lab. Regulation of the HPA axis by cytokines. Kokubyo Gakkai Zasschi 1996. Wisconsin Medical J. Neurophysiological and neuropsychological function in mercuryexposed dentists. Med Pr 1981. Vnitmi Lekarstvi 1998. Haukelands sykehus. & Tumbull AV. lshi Y.html. (396) Epidemiologisk undersokning av fosterkador hos 1. research web pages (by condition) & (c) A subset of patients with common variable immunodeficiency. J Rheumatol 1997. 1: 1147-I 150.caulk. Glutathione Transferasen und Krankheit. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1991. Zhang (387) Caulk.analyslab@swipnet. LMI. Exposure of dentists and assistants to mercury: levels in urine and hair related to conditions of practice. Kusada Y. Seitschrift fur Umweltmedizin 1999. Juszkiewicz T. Z Emahrungswiss 1990. & (b)Ionescu G. 46:201-6. Jan 7.(385)(a) Kohdera T. www. 8: 213-25. Mori T. . Univ. Bartova J. Environmental Health Perspectives 1993. & Doctors Data Lab . (389) Brunker P. & Hooper A. 15(l): Rother D. Mercury poisoning in Dentistry. Rivier . http://www. Reactions to metals in patients with chronic fatigue and autoimmune endocrinopathy. Antigen-specific lymphocyte stimulation test on patients with psoriasis vulgaris. Koh N.Pb) in food for infants and small children. Thomassen Y. et Of Arkansas. (393) Furuhjelm M. barn. J Appl toxicol 1995. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988. & MetaMetrix Lab. Mercury levels in urine and head hair of dental personnel. 16(3): 153-8. & Sterzl I. 7:39-45. Kith P. Ivaskova E. The Lancet 1982. http://www. Sedlmeier R. Jonson B.26( 1):24-S. 251(3). (394) Blatter B.doctorsdata. Aug 1980. Dale JK. & Ng TB. Sumner AJ. Uninary selenium excretion in workers with low exposure to mercury vapor. Hrda P. Ueda K. Biol Med 1996. Effect of mercury on the sexual cycle and prenatal and postnatal development of progeny. Ott 1997. (388) Sata K.Cd. Int J of Fertility 1962. Roeleveld N. Eur J Human Genet 1998. Chromosone Damage in Individuals exposed to heavy metals. Kim YJ.Buchwald DS. (article in German with English abstract) (392) Gebbart E. (amalgam manufacturer). Toxic effect of heavy metals on cells isolated 6om the rat adrenal and testis. XVI International Congress of Allergology and Clinical Immunology.45(9):527-3 I (383) Saito K. 27(l): 30-3. Song KB.doctorsdata.. Norgeyrkesmed. 29(1):54-73. Analysis of a genetic factor of metal allergy-polymorphism of HLA-DR-DO gene. 1979. Wener MH. & Szzell BP and Oler J. 7(I). Chronic low-level mercury exposure and neuropsychological functioning. Bartova J. 1999. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1990 Jan. lmi.

Zamm. CD+4 helper T-cell depression in autism. Mar 1999. Heymann E. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. CANDIDA ALBICANS THERAPY: Dental mercury removal. J Laryngol Otol. (409)Autism:auniqueformofmercurypoisoning. Cochran SR. Metabolic changes in aromatic amino acids and monoamines in infantile autism and a new related treatment. Serotonin acid content in platelets of autistic children. & Liska. 43(6):1063-g. (4 14)Wecker L. Epidemiology 2000. WB Saunder Envir Health Perspect. Med. Autism. web group of parents with autistic kids and autism doctors and researchers. Plasma excitatory amino acids in autism. 1989. & Yonk LJ et al. ‘Isolation and characterization of dipeptyl peptidase IV from human Biochem 1982 Aug. Med. Elevated T cell subpopulations in dental students. (412) (a) Moreno-Fuenmayor H. Schweinsberg F. 63(5):593-6. Autism and schizophrenia%nked to malfunctioning enzyme for milk protein digestion.R. Toxicity assessmentof mercury vapor from dental amalgams. J. Dipeptyl Peptidases in placenta’. & Kar NC.1904. Hautarzt 1994 Oct. Functional abnormalities of CD8+ T cells define a unique subset of patients with common variable immunodeficiency. Toxicol Ind Health 1998. 1997. 107( 11):895-99. Immunity to Candida Albicans: Thl. Exacerbation of pustular psoriasis in mercury poisoning. (405) Stejskal J. New Engl J Med 1992. Singharo S. 105(4-5): 525-35. Mercury concentration in gray hair. Knight LC.126(2):359-65.37(2): 113-28. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1987.Cancer Lett. Pathologic mechanisms in ALS and other motor neuron 99. Cantor DS. 59(6):551-7. Residual Oil Fly Ash Amplifies Allergic Cytokines. p473-88. Valera V. Clin 1996. 87(5): 3 12-6. Strober W.). 82(1-2): 185-92. In: Came DB(Ed. Candida. & Edelson SB. Kuncl RW. 1999. (4 16) (a) Plaitakis A. Blood 1993. Burrows D. 20:345-358. Brain Res Bull 1993. The role of metals in autoimmune diseases and the link to neuroendocrinology Neuroendocrinology Letters. http://www. an effective adjunct. 19:3 19-329. Acta Psychiatr Stand 1993. 29(Pt 1): 15-22.30(3-4):38 1-6 &(b)Rothstein JD. Fierlbeck G. 1990. Miller SB. Hickman J. (404) M.FAAP) Autism 99 : A National Emergency. (415) Reichrtova E et al. .edelsoncenter. 1998. Dugger DL. Traffic-related air pollution is associated with atopy in children living in urban areas. Cade et al.45( 10):708-l 0. & (b)Rolf LH. Takesada M. Martin LJ. & Kramer U et al. E. The detoxification enzyme systems. Dysbiosis and Amalgam. Eur J 1978. Is infantile autsim a hypoglutamatergic disorer? J Invest Neural Transm 1998. 1985 Mar. 106:9. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 1989. Fay A. N-acetyl-aspartate and Nacetyl-aspartyl-glutamate in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. (402) Ando T. Johnson WD. No To Hattatsu. Autism: xenobiotic influences. (408) Eedy DJ. Adv. (403) Maya11 FG. Hayashi T. and Inflamation in Mice. & Jaffe JS. (4 13) Autism-Mercury@egroups. 1999. 25(4):341-5. 221-33. Immunol Lett. Godfrey. 160(6): 1897. Arrieta A. & Seroussi K. Yamazaki K. & Alfred V. Pearson CM. Trace element concentrations in hair from autistic children. 82(l): 192-20. vol 9 no 2 (1996). Appl Toxicol 1992. Haarman FY. & Pierson HF.& Carlsson ML. (407) Wehner-Caroli J. Altem Med Rev 1998. 3(3): 187-98. melanoma growth by copper chelates. “An amalgam tattoo of the soft palate: a case report with energy dispersive X-ray analysis. 1992 Sep. vl#4 ~~261-5 (1986) Orthmol. Wakisaka 1. J prosthet Dent 1990. Neurodegenerative Diseases.Th2 cells and beyond. Scherwitz C. Curr Opin Microbial Borjas L. 1999. 834-5. Hatano H. Kehrer H. Dlifford T. Autism and Pervasive human muscle disease.mercury. Constantakakis E.etc.garynull.326: 1464-8:&c (c) Leigh Pn.. Fundam.htm (4 10) J. & http://www. 14(4): 553-63. 2 l(2): 18 l-9. “Cord Serum Immunoglobulin E Related to Environmental Contamination of Human Placentas with Oganochlorine Compounds”. & and amino (c)Naruse H. Sneller MC. 1 l( 1): 64-70. (411) Puschel G. “Pharmacological perturbation of murine 2612. DJ. Decreased glutamte transport by the brain and spinal cord in ALS. J.html : & Yazbak FE(MD. 2(4):363-7. pl74. Grotemeyer KH. see #2 18 (406) Goering PI. http://www. & Romani L. Altered metabolism of excitatory amino acids. & Gavett SH et al. Detic Res 1985. Airway Responsiveness. Mentlein Clin Chim Acta Developmental Disorders . Rowland AS. Stejskal V.

I 9(3): 373-377. Nielsen JB. Hirai M.44(3 Suppl I):S85-8. &(e) Pollard KM. Issues in developmental neurotoxicology: interpretation and implications of the data.96(3):348-57. The neuropsychiatric sequelae of mercury poisoning. Motor neuron disease: retrospective study of associated abnormalities. Bacterial oxidation of mercury metal vapor. 100( 11): 1299-303. & Brown IA. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 198 1. J Immunol 1997. 352. & Felmus MT. 1985 ? Biochem 1990. & Akaike A et al. March 28. Environmental toxins and their common health effects. Tabuse M. & Matter-Grutter C. 89(Suppl): S3 I-40. 8: 1183-90. DC. 20:667-9. Pasic A. & M. Arch Int Physiol 98(5):261-7. Satoh H. J Autoimmun I 997 Ott.73(3): 395-401. Barone S. 72:674Schwarz S. FASEB J 1994. Yamamura Y.43(3):249-54.77(2): 141-8. Sands S. Mercurialism and its control in the felt hat industry. Can J Public Health 1998. 1602. ALS after accidental injection of mercury. Moller G. Baillod R. Krejci 1. Summers AO. Abedi-Valugerdi M. Srikantaiah MV. (422) Reese Km. (427) Chetty CS.37(6):3 18-2 1. Adverse immunological effects and autoimmunit induced by dental amalgam in mice. & Patten BM.(417) Folkers K et al. Environ Res 1998. Connolly SM.M.26(2): 167-72. The Mad Hatter’s disease revisited.and T helper 2-type responses are involved. (430) Fukino H. (419) Lipozencic I. Appl Environ . Pretreaunent of lymphocytes with mercury in vitro induces a genetically determined low-responders and a shift of the interleukin profile. Toxic01 Appl Pharmacol I984. Environ Health Perspect 1995. European J of Pharmacology 1993. Magnesium. Major histocompatibility complex class II antigens are required for both cytokine production and proliferation induced by mercuric chloride in vitro.l27(9):1333-8. Rajanna B. Immunology 1999 Mar. Amount of mercury from dental amalgam filling released into the atmosphere by cremation. & PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS. Chem & Engin News. Critical Periods of Vulnerability for the Developing Nervous System: Evidence horn human and animal models. The dentistry aspects. Patten BM. “Inorganic mercury intoxiflcation similar to ALS”. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995. Contact Dermatitis 1998 Sep. Swanke L. Wong A. Advanced glycation end products in neurodegeneration: markers of oxidative stress? Ann Neural 1998 Sep.Barber. Effect of zinc pretreatment on mercuric chloride-induced lipid peroxidation in the rat kidney. Altem Med Rev 2000. MC Garvey JA. & (b) Hu H. (426) Hultman P. Kishimoto T. Mallette LE. 5( 1):52-63. & cases. ~80-81. Mechanism of mercury-induced autoimmunity: both T helper I. against glutamate cytotoxicity in cultured cortical neurons. Arch Dermatol 1991 Sep. Contact sensitivities in palrnar plantar pustulosis (acropustulosis). Chronic mercurialism-a cause of the clinical syndrome of ALS.7(3):15 l-6. Turley SJ. Sian J.108(supp 3):5 ll533. Riederer P. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Schweiz 1990. Winkelmann RK. Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi 1994 Jul. Yamane Y. Biochemical evidence for a deficiency of vitamin B6 in subjects reacting to MSLGlutamate. Mercury emissions from crematoria. Lee DK. Mercury Monatsschr Zahnmed emission measurements in a crematorium. & Felipo V et al. Akama Y. Br J Psychiatry 1995. Rice. 158: 342 l-8. Radhakrishnan AN. 167( 1): 95-8. Indian J Biochem 1970 Sep. PUBLIC HEALTH BULLETIN #263. 1978. 103(Supp 6): 73-76. Dis Nerv Syst 1976 Jun. Contact allergy and psoriasis. & (d) HultmanP. Goodwin GM. more than early (425) (a) Hu H.105(8):1023-8 (421) Yoshida M. (43 1) Smith T. Pitts K. J of Occup Med. (428) O’Carroll RE. Husstedt I. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1954. Lutz F. Neurochemical Research 1994. L-camatine increases the affinity of glutamate for quisqualate receptors and prevents glutamate neurotoxicity. Milavec-Puretic V. (424) Munch G. Casiano CA. Studies on the metabolism of vitamin B6 in the small intestine. Abedi-Valugerdi M.39(3): 108-l 1 (420) Rivola 1. Molter G. Effects in vitro on rat brain Mg(++)-ATPase. & (c) Hu H. Imfeld T. (418) Purification and properties of monkey intestinal pyridoxal kinase. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 9. Hsueh YM. (423) ‘T. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 1992 Roujeau JC et al. & 1996. 194 1. The effect of toxicokinetics on murine mercury-induced autoimmunity. Antecedent events in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Neurology 1976 Feb. Cremation and the environmental mercury burden. Environ Health Perspect 2000. (429) Rodier P. The autoimmunity-inducing xenobiotic mercury interacts with the autoantigen fibrillarin and modifies its molecular structure ad antigenic properties. Johansson U. Imfeld T. Protective effects of a vitamin-B 12 analog(methylcobalamin. 12-7-98. McBride V. Lutz F. Master-ton G.60:698.Burk et al. Analysis of 63 Sep. 100: 972.4 1(7):6 18-24. 4(5-6): 325-332. & Crinnion WJ. Developing brain as a target of toxicity. Moller G. Abedi-Valugerdi M. Gerlach M.24 l(1): 1-6 . & Lancet 1998.90(2): 198-204. Jz Rice DC. immunology response in T cells from 1997 Feb. & Yiannias JA. 10(5):44 I-6.

(437) Affinity Labeling Technology. & Matthews RT. Dental Materials Reactivity Testing. Report 2652.Monograph. & ImmunoSciences Lab. http://ww-w.safekidsinfo. Microbial 1998. Colo. McRory JE. Eleanor & Lou Gehrig MDA/ALS Center at ColumbiaPresbyterian Medical Center in New York. 2000. mercuric chloride intoxication.helsetilsynet. Moses LG. National Academy Press. Norge yrkesmed. Neurobehavioral effects fi-om exposure to dental amalgam vapor(HgO): new distinctions exposure and Hg body burden.95( 15):8892-7. Yanaghara T. Proc Nat1 Acad Sci U S A 1998 Jul 21. & Schulz JB. (44 1)National Academy of Sciences. Swedish Council for Coordinating and Research. 9(2-4):262-6. see research web pages on amalgam toxicity. Neuroprotective strategies for treatment of lesions produced by mitochondrial toxins: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. Avd. Inc. In vitro inhibition of digestive enzymes by heavy metals 1996.. National Research Council. National Acad Sci. 265(3): 159-62. . No. & ldebenone . & Evaluating Chemical and Other Agent Exposures for Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity Subcommittee on Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity. Coenzyme QlO administration and its potential for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Kunci RW.altcorp. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. Results of dental amalgam removal and mercury detoxification. http://www. paper for Conference on Male-Mediated Developmental Toxicity. ID: FEDRJP/l999/07802766. Altem Med Rev 2001 Feb. Benefit of a combined treatment with trientine and ascorbate in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis model mice.71(4):1043-8. CoQlO Use Leads To Dramatic Improvements In Patients With Muscular Disorder. 262 pages. J lnorg Biochem Mitra S.Dept. June 22. between recent (435) Norwegian Board of Health.7(6):54858. (446) P. root canals. (443) Troy CM. “Sperm on the wane”. Ogawa Y. Altem Ther Health Med 2000 Jul. Colorada Springs. & Heavy Metal Bul. Skinner’s Science of Dental Materials. Of Biological Sciences. Snutch TP. & (b)Nagano S. 6. Yang L. & National Environmental Trust (NET).401(6755):800-4. Matthews RT. & (c) C. Haukelands sykehus. 1980. Dental Materials Biocompatibility http://www.peakenergy. (Medical Laboratory) Arzte fur Laboratoriumsmedizen. of bovine xanthine oxidase activity by Hg2+ and other metal ions. 6 x 9. Shelanski ML. Neuroscience 1996 Apr. feedback of syntaxin-l A. that Affects Child Development and Learning” Sept 2000.6(4):49-55. (434) Echeverria D et al. Dristol LA.2001. Head. Gooch et al. 3 13 pages. April 2001. Baik M. June 22. Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Beal MF. & DiMauro S. 1999. A potent antioxidant and stimulator of nerve growth factor. 91( 14):6384-7. inc. Inc. 20(6): 729-35 Mondal MS. http://www. & John Aitken. Inhibition Gupta PK. (433) Epidemiologisk undersokning av fosterkador hos 1. & Rothstein JD. 1999. & Kasarskis EJ(MD). http://www. Cut-r Opin Neurol 1994. Neurology.-W. Browne S. Kidney ectopeptidases in mercuric chloride-induced renal B iochem (438) Stefanovic V. DATABASE. et al. H.immuno-sci-lab. 1994. Coenzyme QlO administration increases brain mitochondrial concentrations and exerts neuroprotective effects. Brown RH. Cell Physiol 1998. Metallothionein in ALS Motor Neurons(IRB #91-22026).Phillips.6(1) (442) Olanow CW. D-28357 Bremen. Metals and free radicals in neurodegeneration. barn. 3 June 2001 (445) Clifford Consulting & Research. Committee on Toxicology. USA.(Dental Lab). Sakoda S. Afienposton 6 mpv 1997. (432) Sutton KG.coml Testing.91(10) & Peak Energy Performance.200l. 62(4): 27 l-9. Biofactors 1999. http://www. 1994. (439) Part 1. and their reversal by chelating agents: (440) Kidd RF. The Gazette. & Sastry KV. cavitations.ccrlab. National Research Council. FEDRJP National Technical Information Service(NTIS). University of Newcastle in Australia. fodda sedan 1967. Neurosci Lett 1999. Down-regulation of copper/zinc superoxide dismustase causes apoptotic death in PC12 neuronal cells. June 1. Scientific Frontiers in Develonmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment. “Polluting Our Future: Chemical Pollution in the U.2 milj. P/Q-type calcium channels mediate the activity-dependent Nature 1999. ALS Newsletter Vol. Guthrie H. Montreal. Beal (436) Schiwara.S. Henshaw DR.200l. Arendash GW. S(5): 278-84. (444) (a7 Beal MF. oral toxicity testing technology and tests.W. Bull Environ Contam Toxic01 1978. Proc. 1:28. Chronic inhibition of superoxide dismustase produces apoptotic death Hosier of s inal neurons. Committee on Developmental Toxicology.64(4): 132832. Physicians for Social Responsibility and the Learning Disabilities Association of America.

JAMA. (45 1) Miszta H. & Maes M. U.. & Walsh WJ. J Child Psycho1 Psychiatry 1996.mercola. Cutis 1990 Nov. lead and iron depletion of zinc. David. July 1986. JAMA. Ott 2000. 189-199. selenium. & Levine SP. Herrmann M.308 (455) Lindvall A: Lindh U.3.3:105-12). v.19(1):57-63: &Bekaroglu M. & Devinsky. Depression and magnesium deficiency.55(3):239-41. magnesium. Lindh. Int J Psychiatry Med 1989. Isny. Altamura C. A. member of Editorial board for Ganzheitliches Medicine 535-536. Przegl Dermatol 1980. Mental health in the workplace in Finland. The journal Psychosomatics. 1979. induces cell cytotoxicity and oxidative stress and increases beta-amyloid secretion and tau Mercury phosphotylation in SHSYSY neuroblastoma cells. (463) Johnson S. #2.S. DAMS: Assoc. Neurology 29:43 1. BRD fax: 0049 7562 550 52 (460) Edwards AE. Aggression in cat and human precipitated by a cholinesterase inhibitor. Renard P. Suppl:l-13.11. Br J Ind Med 1982 May. Langolf GD.53. Jennifer: Bear. Journal of Advancement in Medicine. Depression and Candida.69:97-107.melisa. p304.67(6):823-9 [Article in Polish] . Aslan Y. Relationships between serum free fatty acids and zinc with ADHD. 1988 & Hallgren.htm (not used) (458) Dowling AL.htm. Of Dental Mercury Patients-U. v. Spencer P: Toxic Neuropathies. Health Research Institute. pgs. Depression associated with Candida albicans infections. vol. Muller-Spahn F. Nucl lnstr and Meth B30:404.ilo. vitamins 82. University of Connecticut Health Center. & Bamett JH.42(5):349-358. 116( 1): 15 l-5. Albers JW. Presented at Eurotox Lindh. 4. Robert. Cavender GD. Spring 1992. Iannacone EA. & (c)(Human Reproduction Jun2000. & Swedish Association of Dental Mercury Patients. vol. 27.J. David. cadmium. Dabrowski Z. Pfeiffer Treatment Center. Jensen IW. Demedts P. Peripheral blood lymphocyte transformation test in various skin diseases of allergic origin.(447) Amalgam/mercury poisoned patients organizations. Norman. “Autoimmune Disease Overlooked as a Leading Cause of Death in WJ. (www. Germany. Stahehn HB.46(5):430-2 (nickel & lupus) (457) International Labor Organization. Orrin. Jerrold. pgs. 1):231-6. Fall 1998. Gedik Y. Neels H.neurological) (453) Blumer W. Autism and Metal Metabolism. Feltelius. “Mercury toxicity and dental amalgam fillings”. Am J Public Health 2000. n. Brockhaus M. Wauters. Biol Psychiatry 1997. Keman. Mortensen PB.253(23): 3400. The possible role of gradual accumulation of copper. Danersund A. p. n3. 15:308. U. Optimal Center Newsletter. Maternal Hypothyroidism Selectively Affects the Expression of Neuroendocrine-Specific Protein A Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in the Proliferative Zone of the Fetal Rat Brain Cortex. Karahan C.amalgam. United Kingdom and United States. & Bear.90:1463-1466. J Neurochem 2000 Jan. and E and essential fatty acids in multiple sclerosis. Sweden. (462) Olivieri G. Aug 2000. Wassertomstrasse 6 . #7. http:Nwww.MCS. S J Walsh and L M Rau. Rosenbaum. D. Aggressive Behavior Following Exposure to Cholinesterase Inhibitors. Metal Profiles in 25 Patients with Long-Term (over 800 N. Vandoolaeghe E. & Mult Scler 1997. Stilley JS.nulenglinfoengl . . 1985. B6.hriptc. & J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1999. http://www.25 1:22. http://www. (449) Schaumburg H. www. (464) Walsh. Elemental mercury exposure: peripheral neurotoxicity. (461) Rasmussen HH. Desnyder R. “Mercury vapor produced during sterilization of amalgam-contaminated instruments” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. (452) Uppsala Amalgam Clinic. Lubow RM. Brack C. Discoid lupus (nickel & lupus) erythematosus exacerbated by contact dermatitis. J. 1988 (456) Panasiuk J . Med Hypotheses 2000 Sep. March 1985. 37(2):225-7. http://www. R.142(1):390-399 (459) Isny Clinic(South Germany) Kurt Muller . Zoeller RT. Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morph01 Blutforsch 1989. MD. Hock C.200o. Metal-Metabolism and Human Functioning. Endocrinology 2001 Jan 1. Mercola. Lower serum zinc in major depression is a sensitive marker of treatment resistance and of the immune/inflammatory response in that illness. Effect of mercury and combined effect of mercury on the activity of acetylcholinesterase of rat lymphocytes during in vitro incubation.html (448) Dr.39(2): 136-9 (450) Dr. & Crook WG. Meltzer HY.219 (454) Cooley RL. Ott 20. Journal of Neuropsychiatry. 93 Congress & Rheumatol.

& Q HRI-Pfeiffer Center Autism Study; paper presented to Dan Conference, Jan 200 1;
(465) Walsh WJ, HeaIth Research Institute, Biochemical Treatment of Mental Illness and Behavior Disorders,
Minnesota Brain Bio Assoc, Nov 17, 1997;; & William J. Walsh, Laura
B. Glab, and Mary L. Haakenson; Pfieffer Treatment Center, Biochemical Therapy and Behavior Outcomes;
(466) Chen KM, Department of Neurology, Guam Memorial Hospital; Disappearance of ALS From Guam:
implications for exogenous causes, 2000.
(467) Interpretation of Diagnostic Tests, A Synopsis of Laboratory Medicine, Fifth Edition.
(468) Overzet K, Gensler TJ, Kim SJ, Geiger ME, van Venrooij WJ, Pollard KM, Anderson P, Utz PJ. Small
nucleolar RNP Scleroderma autoantigens associate with phosphorylated serine/arginine splicing factors
apoptosis. Arthritis Rheum 2000 Jur1;43(6):1327-36
(469), the book, by David Perlmutter MD; Perlmutter Health Center, Naples, Florida,; &
M.M. Van Benschoten and Associates, Reseda, Calif. Clinic; http:/?‘WWw.Illmvbs.corn
(470) Dr. Garth Nicholson, Institute for Molecular Medicine, Huntington Beach, Calif.,
& Michael Guthrie, R.Ph. 07-l 8-2001 Mycoplasmas - The Missing Link in Fatiguing
New Treatments for
Illnesses,; &
Chronic Infections Found in Fibromyalgia Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Rheumatoid Arthritis,
and Gulf War Illnesses,;

& Prof. Garth L.

Nicolson, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia Syndrome and Other Fatigue Conditions,; & Dr. G. Nicholson, Institute for Molecular
Medicine, New Treatments for Chronic Infections Found in
Fibromyalgia Syndrome, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Multiple Sclerosis,
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and Gulf War Illnesses,
.html & (b) Imrnunosciences Lab,
(47 1) Schwartz RB, Garada BM, Komaroff AL, Gleit M, Holman BL. Detection of intracranial abnormalities in
patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of MRl and SPECT. Am J Roentgenol, 1994,
162(4):935-4 1; & Spect Imaging: comparison of findings in patients with CFS, AIDA dementia complex, and
major unipolar depression, Am J Roentgen01 1994, 162(4): 943-5 1; & Ichiso M, Salit IE, Abbey SE.
Assessment of regional cerebral perfusion by SPECT in CFS. Nucl Med Commun 1992; 13:767-72.
(472) Patarca-Monero R, Klimas NG, Fletcher MA. Immunotherapy of chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of
Fatigue Syndrome. 2001,8( 1): 3-37; & DeBecker P, De Meirleir K, Joos E, Velkeniers B. DHEA
response to 1.V. ACTH in patients with CFS. Horm Metab Res 1999,3 l(1): 18-2 1.
(473) De Meirleir K, Bisbal C, Campine I, De Becker, et al. A 37 kDa I-5A binding protein as a potential
biochemical marker for CFS. Am J Med 2000,108(2): 99-105; & Suhadolnik RJ, Peterson DL, Obrien K, et al,
Biochemical evidenc,efor a novel low molecular weight 2-SA-dependent Rnase L in CFS. J Interferon Cytokine
Res, 1997, 17(7): 377-85.
(474) Richards SCM, Bell J, Cheung, YL, Cleare A, Scott DL. Muscle metabolites detected in urine in FM and
CFS suggest ongoing muscle damage. Conference Proceedings of the British Society of Rheumatologists, April
2001, Scotland, Abstract 382; http://fi-eespace,
(475) Hugh Fudenberg, MD, paper: NVIC lntemational Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997.
(476) Dr Thomas Verstraeten, US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Summary Results: Vaccine Safety
Datalink Project - a database of 400,000 children , May 2000.
(477) Lars Landner and Lennart Lindestrom. Swedish Environmental Research Group(MFG), Copper in societv
and the Environment, 2nd revised edition. 1999.
(478) Ganser, AL; Kirschner, DA. The interaction of mercurials with myelm: Comparison of
in vitro and in vivo effects. Neurotoxicol, 6( 1):63-77, 1985; & Windebank, AJ. Specific Inhibition of

Myelination by Lead in vitro; Comparison with Arsenic, Thallium, and Mercury. Exp Neurol,
94(1):203-l 2, 1986; & International Labor Organization (ILO). Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and
Vol. 2. ED: Parmeggiani, L., pp. 1332-59 1983.
Safety, 3rd Ed.,
(479) Amphotericin B, HgCl2 and Peritoneal Transport in Rabbits, Zweers MM, Douma CE, van der Wardt AB,
Krediet RT, Struijk DG. Department ofNephrology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Accepted Abstracts : The 3rd European Peritoneal Dialysis Meeting - 5-7 April 1998, Edinburgh, U.K.
(480) Salzer HM, Relative hypoglycemia as a cause of neuropsychiatric illness, J National Med ASSOC,1996,
58( 1): I2- 17; & Heninger GR et al, Depressive symptoms, bolucose tolerance, and insuIin tolerance, J Nervous
and Mental Dis, 1975; 16 1(6):42 l-32; & Winokur A et al, Insulin resistance in patients with major depression,
Am J Psychiatry, 1988, 145(3): 325-30.
(48 I) Virkkunen M, Huttunen MO; Evidence for abnormal glucose tolerance among violent offenders,
Neuropsychiobilogy, 1982, 8:30-40; 8c Markku I, Virkkunen L; Aggression, suicidality, and serotonin, J
Psy 1992,53( 10): 46-5 1;
(482) Linnoila M et al, Low serotonin metabolite differentiates impulsive horn
nonimpulsive violent
behavior, Life Sciences, 1983,33(26): 2609-2614; & Lopez-lbor JJ , Serotonin and psychiatric disorders,
lnt Clinical Psychopharm, 1992,7(2): 5-l 1.
(483) Thomas DE et al, Tryptophan and nutritional status in patients with senile dementia, Psychological Med 1986,
16:297-305; & Yaryura-Tobias JA et al, Changes in serum tryptophan and glucose in psychotics and neurotics,
Nutrition, No.4557, ~1132; Camey MWP, Brit Med J, 1967,4:5 12-5 16.
(484) Urberg M, Zemel MB; Evidence for synergism between chromium and nicotinic acid in the control of glucose
tolerance in elderly humans, Metabolism, 1987,36(g): 896-899; & J Family Practice, 1988,27(6): 603-606;
& Anderson RA et al, Effects of supplemental chromium on patients with reactive hypoglycemia, Metabolism,
1987,36(4): 351-355; & Metabolism, 1983,32(9): 894-99.
(485) Hulda Clark, The Cure for all Diseases, 2000, (amalgam replacement and treatment for
parasites)(U.S. CDC confirms parasites common in those with chronic immune conditions)
(486) Hulda Clark, The Cure for All Cancers, 1998,; & Gerson
(487) Haut MW; Morrow LA; Pool D; Callahan TS; Haut IS; Franzen MD. Neurobehavioral effects of acute
exposure to inorganic mercury vapor. Appl Neuropsychol 1999;6(4): 193-200.
(488) Huang X; Cuajungco MP et al; Cu(l1) potentiation of Alzheimer’s abeta neurotoxicity. Correlation with
cell-free hydrogen peroxide production and metal reduction. J Biol Chem 1999 Dee 24;274(52):37111-6
(489) Waggoner DJ, Barn&as TB, Githn JD. The role of copper in neurodegenerative disease. Neurobiol Dis
1999 Aug;6(4):22 l-30; & (b) Torsdottir G, Kristinsson J, Gudmundsson G, Snaedal J, Johannesson T.
Copper, ceruloplasmin and superoxide dismustase (SOD) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Pharmacol oxicol
2000 Sep;S7(3): 126-30; & 0
Estevez AG,Beckman JS et al, Induction of nitric oxide-dependent
apoptosis in motor neurons by zinc-deficient superoxide dismustase. Science 1999 Dee 24;286(5449):
2498-500; & (d) Cookson MR, Shaw PJ. Oxidative stress and motor neurons disease. Brain Path01 1999
Jan;9( 1): 165-86.
(490) Rojas M, Olivet C . Occupational exposure and health effects of metallic mercury among dentists and dental
assistants: a preliminary study. Valencia, Venezuela; Acta Cient Venez 2000;5 1(1):32-S; & Nadorfy-Lopez
E, Bello B. Skeletal muscle abnormalities associated with occupational exposure to mercury vapors.
Histol Histopathol2000 Jul;l5(3):673-82.
(491) Nerudova J, Cabelkova Z, Cikrt M; Mobilization of mercury by DMPS in occupationally exposed workers.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2000; 13(2): 13 l-46 .
(492) Glina DM, Satut BT, Andrade EM. Occupational exposure to metallic mercury in the dentist’s ofice ofa
public primary health care clinic in the city of Sao Paulo. Cad Saude Publica 1997 Apr;13(2):257-267.
(493) Moller AT, Spangenberg JJ. Stress and coping amongst South African dentists in private practice. J Dent
Assoc S Afi 1996 Jun;S 1(6):347-57; & Stefansson CG, Wicks S, Health care occupations and suicide in
Sweden 196 l-l 985. Sot Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 199 1 Dec;26(6):259-64
(494) (a)Kobayashi MS, Han D, Packer L. Antioxidants and herbal extracts protect HT-4 neuronal cells against
glutamate-induced cytotoxicity. Free Radic Res 2000 Feb;32(2):115-24(PMID: 10653482; & Ferrante


of EGb761 (Gingko
RJ, Klein
AM, Dedeoglu
A, Beal MF. Therapeutic
in a transgenic
mouse model of amyotrophic
FP, Steffen VM,
J Mol Neurosci
2001 Aug; 17 (1) : 89-96
& Bridi RCrossetti
Henriques AT. The antioxidant activity of standardized extract of Ginkgo biioba (EGb 761) in
Phytother Res 2001 Aug;l5(5):449-5

1 ; & Packer

L, Tritschler HJ, Wessel K. Neuroprotection by the

metabolic antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid. Free Radic Biol Med 1997;22(1-2):359-78(PMID:
8958163); &
McCarty MF. Versatile cytoprotective activity of Iipoic acid may reflect its ability to activate signalling
intermediates that trigger the heat-shock and phase II responses. Med Hypotheses 2001 Sep;57(3):3 13-7 &
(b)Whiteman M, Tritschler H, Halliwell B. Protection against peroxynitrite-dependent tyrosine nitration and
alpha I-antiproteinase inactivation by oxidized and reduced Iipoic acid. FEBS Lett 1996 Jan 22;379(1):746(PMID: 8566234); & 0 “Decreased phagocytosis of myelin by macrophages with ALA. Journal of
Neuroimmunology 1998,
92:67- 75; & (d) & ZGregus et al, “Effect of lipoic acid on biliary excretion of
glutathione and metals”, Toxicol APPI Pharmacol, 1992, 114(1):88-96; & (e) Li Y, Liu L, Barger
SW, Mrak RE, Griffin
WS. Vitamin
E suppression
of microglial
J Neurosci
Res 2001 Ott 15;66(2):163-70.
(495) Kang JH, Eum WS. Enhanced oxidative damage by the familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated
Cu,Zn-superoxide dismustase mutants. Biochem Biophys Acta 2000 Dee 15;1524(2-3): 162-70; & (b) JH, Eum
WS. Enhanced oxidative damage by the familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis- associated Cu,Zn-superoxide
dismustase mutants. Biochem Biophys Acta 2000 Dee 15; 1524(2-3): 162-70; & Q Liu H, Zhu H, Eggers
Nersissian AM, Faull KF, Goto JJ, Ai J, Sanders-Loehr J, Gralla EB, Valentine IS. Copper(2+)
binding to the
surface residue cysteine 111 of His46Arg human copper-zinc superoxide dismustase, a familial
lateral sclerosis mutant. Biochemistry 2000 Jul 18;39(28):8125-32; &c(d) Wong PC, Gitlin JD; et
al, Copper
chaperone for superoxide dismustase is essential to activate mammalian Cu/Zn superoxide
dismustase. Proc Nat1
Acad Sci U S A 2000 Mar 14;97(6):2886-91; & (e)Kruman II, Pedersen WA, Springer
JE, Mattson MP.
ALS-linked Cu/Zn-SOD mutation increases vulnerability of motor neurons to
excitotoxicity by a mechanism
involving increased oxidative stress and perturbed calcium homeostasis. Exp
Neurol 1999 Nov;l60( 1):28-39
(496) Doble A. The role of excitotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease: implications for therapy. Pharmacol Ther
1999 Mar;8 l(3): 163-22 1; &
Urushitani M, Shimohama S. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor-mediated
mitochondrial Ca(2+) overload in acute excitotoxic motor neuron death: a mechanism distinct from chronic
neurotoxicity after Ca(2+) influx. J Neurosci Res 2001 Mar 1;63(5):37’7-87; & Cookson MR, Shaw PJ.
Oxidative stress and motor neurons disease. Brain Path01 1999 Jan;9( I): 165-86
( 4 97 ) Torres-Aleman 1, Barrios V, Berciano J. The peripheral insulin-like growth factor system in amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis and in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1998 Mar;50(3):772-6 ; & Dal1 R, Sonksen PH et al; The
effect of four weeks of supraphysiological growth hormone administration on the insulin-like growth factor axis
In women and men. GH-2000 Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000 Nov;85( 1 I):4 193-200; & Pons S,
Torres-Aleman I. Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates dephosphorylation of ikappa B through the serine
phosphatase calcineurin. J Biol Chem 2000 Dee 8;275(49):38620-5;
(498) Lai EC, Rudnicki SA. Effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-1 on progression of ALS. A
placebo-controlled study. Neurology 1997 Dec;49(6): 162 l-30; & Yuen EC, Mobley WC. Therapeutic
applications of neurotrophic factors in disorders of motor neurons and peripheral nerves. Mol Med Today 1995
Sep; I (6):278-86; & Dore S, Kar S, Quirion R.
Rediscovering an old tiiend, IGF-I: potential use in the
treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosci 1997 Aug;20(8):326-3 1; & Couratier P, Vallat JM.
Therapeutic effects of neurotrophic factors in ALS; Rev Neural (Paris). 2000 Dee; 156( 12): 1075-7. French.
(499) Van den Berghe G, Bowers C et al, Neuroendocrinology of prolonged critical illness: effects of
exogenous thyrotropin-releasing hormone and its combination with growth hormone secretagogues.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998 Feb;83(2):309-19.
Academy of Periodontology
(AAP) at
the US National
of Health
in Bethesda,

Osterblad M. Soliman A. Ridgway EC. Russell D. 10(9):821-827. & GS Connection 1 l(12): Prevelence of Thyroid Imbalance. Vaccines are the largest cause of insulin-dependent diabetes in young children. GSDL. Williams HSmyth PPA. Stagnaro-Green A.eom (509) Klein RZ. Snyder” Late EEG Findings and Clinical Status after organic mercury poisoning. 5th Ed.con/news/connections/vol12/conn200104 I 1. & Thyroid Imbalances in Pregnancy Linked to Poor Child Neurodelopment. Arch Tntem Med 2000. Reports of Councils and Bureaus. Sci Total Environ 200 1 Apr 10. Baltimore. Clincial Toxicology of Commercial Products. 14th Edition. May 23-28. & Thienes. Term. In vitro inhibition of thymulin production in mercury-exposed thymus of young mice.srvitamins. Childhood Vaccinations and Juvenile-Onset (Type-l) Diabetes. N. Education. Rio de Janeiro.2 Suppl l:S47-54 (508) Bonar DB.72(2): 177-179. Biocompatibilitv of Dental Materials. paper given at American College for Advancement in Medicine. von Mikecz A.270( l-3): 109-l 12 . 7(2):146-52.21 o-78-00 19. Iranmanesh A. wwl~. GSDL.coticdiabetes. The Vitamin and Nutrient Solution to Chronic Health Problems.tzv. which subsequently fold-up to become enzymes. Hodge. 1 l(1): 57-63. Int Arch Allergy Appl lmmunol 1983. Mosier DR. Manowitz NR. Darke C. Basic Clinical Pharmacolow.comlnewsicrlnfiections/vrlll IIconn20niO228. p 1552.D. Return to the Joy of Health. Williams. Paffenberger. Canaris GJ.C. Mitchell ML. Selhub J. Meyer JS.. J Med Screen 2001: 8:18-20.35(3): 163-6 (507) Appel SH. (methyl mercury sniffer) RNA ribose nucleic acid purpose of RNA is to take genetic information from DNA and translate it into proteins. Health and Human Services.Y. 1980. 1972. 3975-3987. Eds. Hyperhomocysteinemia and hypercholesterolemia associated with hypothyroidism in the third U. Engelhardt Jl. Pyy L.html. Committee on Appropriations. Soleo L. which make all of the compounds from which we are formed. May 1980.html (5 10) Morris MS.con~lnews:connections!vclll2~conn2001041 I. Smith. Vo137.esdl..1999.C. Bart Classen. Siklos L. Atkins. & Brenner. 1997.gsdI. Haley. ISBN O-684-81849-3.Harris Coulter. Vol 182. 3rd Ed. J Card Fail 2001. JADA. www. Thyroid antibodies and fetal loss. Mocchegiani E. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2001 Mar. Testimony before the Congress of the United States. and Related Agencies. MD. & Chen M. Contract No. McColgan B. Lea & Febeger. subcommittee on Labor. Vol II1. Early manifestations of “sick eythyroid syndrome” in patients with compensated chronic heart failure. Thyroid 2000.sdl. & Thyroid Antibodies May Spur Pregnancy Loss. & Katzung. 5th Ed. Jacques PI. Shanoudy H. Larsen PR. & Rao.S. Pieragostini E. The Colorado thyroid disease prevalence study. Arch Neural. & Dr.. Rosenberg IH. & Thyroid Dysfunction Linded to Elevated Cardiac Risk. Moe S. Nashville. & de Escobar DM. 155:195-200. www. 1998. Toxicity of Mercury.F. Caries Res 200 1 May-Jun. Philadelphia. Santarelli L. Boca Raton.htm. Smith DR.sdl. Hefferen. & (b) Nordlind K. 2nd Ed. Thyroid in Pregnancy. Clinical Toxicolo. Hadian D. Hypothyroidism and aging: The Rosses’ Survey. www. (504) Gosselin. Significance to health of mercury used in dental practice. Guttridge MG. Orbregon MF. & Center for Chemical Hazard Assessment. 1984. (511) Abramson J. (5 13) (a) Valentino M. Exp Cell Res .200l (502) Dr. Veldhuis F.n. Artherosclerosis 2001. Stimulating effect of mercuric chloride and nickel sulfate on DNA synthesis of thymocytes and peripheral lymphoid cells. 1979. R. Great Smokies Diagnostic Lab. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Medical Neurolow. Fl 1982. Macmillian Publishing Co. (506) Leistevuo J. Haddow JE. Rona. de1 Rey FE. Dental amalgam fillings and the amount of organic mercury in human saliva. & Merck Manuel. April 16. Syracuse Research. GSDL. Smith and D. (505) Gilroy J. May 14. Mayor G. www. Fifth International Conference on Mercury. Is neuropsychological development related to mertnal hypothyroidism or to maternal hypothyroxinemia? C Clin Endocrin Metab (503) Rupp.html (5 12) Zeeman Mercury Spectrometer RA-9 15 Demonstration.. Brazil. June 1971. www. Bostom AG.n. House of Representatives. Potential Occupational Hazards: Dentistrv.. Beers D. Specific inhibition of rRNA transcription and dynamic relocation of fibrillarin induced by mercury. Williams and Wilkins Publisher. 160(4):526-34. Thyroid 2001. Sargent JD. Waisbren Se.909shot. Releation of severity of maternal hypothyroidism to cognitive development of offspring. & Dr. Calcium: the Darth Vader of ALS. CRC Press.

Phenotypic and functional deficiency of natural killer cells in patients with CFS. 9:255-62. Torreilles 1. Buchwald D. Lenette ET. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 2001 Nov. Ducrocq C. Kobayashi S. Sangyo lgaku 1993. (514) Kusaka Y. in:KelIey G. Arch Neurol 1990. Iwaki T. Davis JP. 342. Jr. December 12.. & 0 Dieter MP. Schmidt R. Ann Neural 2000 Apr. Antecedent events in ALS: do they influence clincal onset and prgression? Neuroepidemiology 1990. & (b) el-Fawal HA. 139:3306-13. Neurochem Res 1995. Epidemiologic correlates of sporadic ALS. & Torreilles F. Meco G. 4 1: 1077-84. & Sienko DG. Antioxidants as antirheumatics.. Neural Clin 1987 Feb.2000. protective nuclear responses. 86(6):522-33. Occupational diseasescaused by exposure to sensitizing metals. Neuroendocrine-immune system interactions and autoimmunity. Zinc ions stabilize the association of basic protein with brain myelin membranes. 5 I:71 8-24. Neurology 1984. Blake D. (5 16) Fassbender K. RoelofsIverson RA. USA: WI3 Saunders Company 1997.Mitochrondrial mutations and oxidative pathology. & ArmonC. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974.35:75-87.68(2):218-228. Kikuchi H. Sledge J. & Vanacore N. & (b) Wilder RL. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2001 Jun. 20: 1107-13. Jameson CW. Matsubara K. 18: 136-4 1. Chantry A. Luster MI. Bobba A. Immunologic abnormalities associated with CFS. 37:701-3. Guerin M. Lymphocyte sensitization to basic protein of brain in multiple scherosis and other neurological diseases. Med Lav 1995 Nov-Dee. Mood disorders and dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in conditions such as MS: association with cerebra1 inflammation. J lmmunol associated with spherical or crescent-shaped ubiquitinated intraneuronal inclusions in the parahippocampal gyrus and amygdala. Doh-ura K. & Caliguri M. Neurodegenerative disorders: the role of peroxynitrite. & Barker E. Bennett JPJ. Rheumatoid arthitis. television program narrated by Morley Safer. Salman-Tabcheh S. & (c) Pamham M. 2003 . chronic fatigue syndrome: clinical condition associated with immune activation. Taylor JA. Fujirmura SF.47(4):524-7 (525) Cheshire. (5 15) Casspary EA. Neurology 1991. 13:307-38. Murray C. The shocking tooth about trigeminal neuralgia. O’Brien PC. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1983 Apr. & (b) Firestein GS. Exposure to methyl mercury results in serum autoantibodies to neuro typic and gliotypic proteins. (Eds( Textbook of Rheumatology. & (c) Schwyzer RLJ. 17:267-76. Lancet 199 I. & Riccio P. 9:255-62. Fadem MB.30(2): 153-63. “Relationship between exposure to environmental toxins and motor neuron disease: a case report”. Dean JH.2(2):7 l-8 1. (522 ) Kawashima T. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1999. Giovanneli S. J Neurochem 1988. (5 19) Kong J. Mohammad N. Specificity of zinc binding to myelin basic protein. Inhibition of acetylcholine synthesis and tyrosine nitration induced by peroxynitrite are differentially prevented by antioxidants.60(4):838-46. Neurotoxicology 1996. Multiple sclerosis: plaques caused by 2-step demyelization? Med Hypothesis. HarrisL. Little AR. & Provinciali L. Gaudry-Talarmain YM. & Aoyama K. Xu Z. Bonifati V. Jessop C. (520) Mitchell JD. Fabrizio E. Mitochondrial degeneration in motor neurons triggers the onset of ALS in mice expressing a mutant SODI gene. June 29. Agents Actions SuppI 1993. Mossner R. The role of nitric oxide in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. but not in the neostriatum. ALS and heavy metals. 12:129-42. Vol. Nitration of manganese superoxide dismutase in cerebrospinal fluids is a marker for peroxynitrite-mediated oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases. William P. 34:393-5. (521) Guermonprez L. Immunological and biochemical responses in mice treated with mercuric chloride. Gong 2.44: i89-95. Elveback LR. 338:707-12. and cell death in neurodegeneration. 18:324 I-50. 1990 (524) Urushitani M. Giovagnoli A.259( 1):225-238. Corsi L. Henzi H. ALS: A csse-control study following detection of a cluster in a small Wisconsin community.2000 Aug 25. Clin Infect Dis 1994. Annu Rev lmmunol 1995. J Neurosci 1998. Heavy metals and trace elements in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. (5 17) Earl C. (5 18) Landay AL. 102(5):467-72 (523) CBS Television Network. p. p85 l-88.5(1):43-60. Arch Neural 1998: 55: 66-72.” 60 Minutes”. & (b)Cassarino DS. Mol Pharmacol 2001 Oct. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Shimohama S. New England Journal of Medicine.Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1999 Aug. Boorman GA. Cox JW. 29: l-25. 1983.

com DNA or deoxyribose nucleic acid is what holds each cells genetic code or information. Linet M. Green A.. 60186-01 I 1. West Chicago. http://www. Savitz D. Illinois. www. Cardis Environ Health the Epidemiologic Literature on EMF and Health. Swerdlow A.doctorsdata.O. Review of Perspect . Fecal Elements Test.oceansidemedicine. Vancouver Island. (527) Cline Medical Center.I (526)Ahlbom II.l09 Suppl 6:911-933.Box 111.htm (528) Doctors Data Inc. P. 2001 Dec.