Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Presenteeism on the desk: The relationships with work responsibilities, workto-family conflict and emotional exhaustion among Italian schoolteachers
Chiara Panari Silvia Simbula
Article information:
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emeraldsrm:483399 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald
for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission
guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at:
www.emeraldinsight.com/1753-8351.htm
IJWHM
9,1
84
Received 29 November 2013
Revised 1 June 2014
21 November 2014
Accepted 25 February 2015
Silvia Simbula
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the antecedents and consequences of the
phenomenon of presenteeism in the educational sector. Particularly, the authors tested the relationship
between excessive work responsibilities, presenteeism, work-to-family conflict and workers emotional
exhaustion.
Design/methodology/approach A self-report questionnaire was administered to 264 teachers in
secondary schools.
Findings A subsequent mediation of presenteeism and work-to-family conflict between work
responsibilities and emotional exhaustion was found.
Originality/value The findings of this study will provide help todays organisations for better
understanding and managing the new phenomenon of presenteeism in order to promote workers
well-being and performance.
Keywords Workplace health, Exhaustion, Presenteeism, Teachers well-being, Work-to-family conflict
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
In the past, literature has focused mainly on absenteeism, exploring the costs of this
workers behaviour in the organisational context (Harrison and Martocchio, 1998;
Johns, 1997, 2010), without taking into account the loss of productivity caused by
attending to work despite feeling unhealthy (Hemp, 2004). This phenomenon takes the
name of presenteeism and represents workers behaviour of going to work despite
complaints and ill-health (Aronsson et al., 2000), with the consequence of being unable
to work at normal capacity (Turpin et al., 2004).
Recently, researchers have begun to examine this attitude, starting with some
empirical evidence showing that being unhealthy but present at work causes more
loss of productivity for the organisation than missing work because of absenteeism
(Collins et al., 2005).
In a survey on 2,000 European workers, the percentage of employees reporting they
have engaged in presenteeism at least once during the last year is estimated to range
from 50 to 70 per cent (Eurofound European Foundation for the Improvement of
Living and Working Conditions, 2010), and the European Agency for Safety and Health
at Work (EU-OSHA) (2011) has reported that presenteeism costs twice as much for
organisations compared to absenteeism. Costs are also high in the USA; according to
Hemp (2004), presenteeism costs 150 billion dollars per year for US companies.
To our knowledge, this phenomenon has not yet been examined in a systematic way
in the Italian context. It should be noted that the situation of Italian context is quite
different from the other European countries. In fact, in the latest years the Italian school
system have been affected by continuous reforms that have had an influence on
teachers role, with the consequence of over commitment and excessive responsibilities
without an adequate presence of human resources, career development options, salary
and job security (Drago, 2006). Hence, to our knowledge, this study represents the first
Italian research about antecedents and consequences of presenteeism in the educational
sector which is one of the sectors most affected by the tendency for being unhealthy but
present at work. Therefore, it seems very important to identify both the causes and
consequences in order to prevent its costs for the school organisations.
What can drive workers to come to work when ill?
There are some factors related both to work content and work experiences that can
favour this phenomenon ( Johns, 2011). These two factors are defined, respectively, as
aspects associated with the nature of the job and job design, and aspects about the
organisational context.
Concerning the work content, the highest presenteeism levels have been found in the
care and education sectors because this work involves helping, teaching and providing
service to others and workers are more disposed to work when sick in order to meet
some of the fundamental needs of other people (Aronsson and Gustafsson, 2005). Other
studies underline that care and responsibility demands at work influence the rate of
presenteeism (Widera et al., 2010). In these jobs, task significance and associated high
responsibilities have been shown to be potent antecedents of presenteeism because it is
likely that workers feel irreplaceable at work, both in a subjective and in an objective
way, and are afraid of neglecting social expectancies, mainly when these expectancies
concern helping and supporting other people (Grant, 2008). This perception of
impossibility of replacement is one of the most common reasons for the appearance of
presenteeism (Caverley et al., 2007).
Concerning work experiences, an organisational policy that does not have strict
back-to-work practices, even if not formal and prescribed, cannot ensure adequate
coverage of personnel and enhances the perception of personal responsibility that
encourages presenteeism (Wrate, 1999). In this sense, if the organisational culture is
ambiguous about how workers should behave in case of illness and management is
unaware about the potential effects of presenteeism, it is more likely that there can be a
psychosocial climate where staying at home is perceived as illegitimate (Dew et al.,
2005; Demerouti et al., 2009).
Some organisations also have cultures based on work ethics (like commitment to
work) that promote few absences and disapprove of workers sick absences (Hansen
and Andersen, 2008). For example, primary schoolteachers, whose everyday tasks are
to provide welfare services like teaching or instructing, may be under the influence of
the no-absence type of culture and have a presenteeism rate of 55 per cent, while
engineers and computer scientists, for whom the relationship with users is less pivotal,
have a presenteeism rate of 27 per cent (Aronsson et al., 2000).
The relationship between presenteeism and work-to-family conflict
An aspect that is positively associated to presenteeism is the work-to-family conflict:
the work demands and responsibilities that provoke such conflict also compel
attendance, whether a worker is in good health or not ( Johns, 2011). A high level of
work responsibilities that overcome the real work duties of workers can influence their
Presenteeism
on the desk
85
IJWHM
9,1
86
Presenteeism
on the desk
87
IJWHM
9,1
88
Presenteeism was measured with one item from Aronsson and Gustafsson (2005).
For the Italian version, a standard translation-back translation procedure was used as
recommended by Brislin et al. (1973). Particularly, participants were asked to answer
how many times, in the last year, they went to work ill even if they should have taken
one day off for sickness because of being unhealthy. The item was scored on a
four-point frequency rating scale ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (more than five times),
with 2 (one time) and 3 (two to five times) as intermediate positions of the scale. This
self-report measure is the most commonly used in the study of presenteeism ( Johns,
2010). It has also been normal to measure presenteeism over a 12-month period (see
Aronsson and Gustafsson, 2005; Gustafsson and Marklund, 2011; Deery et al., 2014).
For reasons of comparability, we used this accepted time frame. Moreover, it should be
noted that Demerouti et al. (2009) reported test-retest reliabilities of 0.58 or greater for
six- and 12-month intervals, indicating that the answers on presenteeism were
consistent and related over time.
Emotional exhaustion was measured by the Italian validation of the Maslach
Burnout Inventory-Educator Survey (Sirigatti and Stefanile, 1993). The scale consists
of nine items referring to the depletion of physical and psychological energy because of
work fatigue (e.g. I feel emotionally drained from my work). The items were scored on
a seven-point frequency rating scale ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (everyday). The
reliability for this scale, as measured by Cronbachs , was 0.89.
Results
Descriptive statistics
The means, standard deviations, internal consistencies and correlations were computed
for all study variables (Table I). All significant relationships between the variables were
in the expected direction.
Strategy of analysis
To test our hypothesis, we used an analytical approach outlined by Preacher and Hayes
(2004). This mediation approach tests the indirect effect between the predictor and the
criterion variables through the mediator using a bootstrapping procedure that
addresses some weaknesses associated with the Sobel test (Preacher and Hayes, 2004).
In fact, two of the main assumptions necessary for the Sobel test are that the
distribution of ab i.e. the product of the XM path (a) and the MY path (b) is
normal, and that sample size is large. However, the sampling distribution of ab may not
be normal; in addition, as sample size becomes smaller, the Sobel test becomes less
conservative (Preacher and Hayes, 2004). On the contrary, bootstrapping does not rely
on the assumption of normality and it can also be used with small samples. Moreover,
the bootstrapping method, as implemented in the PROCESS macro for SPSS, with
multiple mediators operating in serial (Model 6; Hayes, 2013) was used to test the
Variable
Table I.
Means, standard
deviations and
correlations of the
study variables
1. Work responsibilities
2. Presenteeism
3. Work-to-family conflict
4. Emotional exhaustion
Notes: n 264. **p o0.01
SD
2.85
2.78
2.41
20.16
0.96
1.00
1.01
11.34
0.18**
0.36**
0.49**
0.30**
0.37**
0.66**
model. To derive the direct and indirect effects, we estimated all the path coefficients in
the model simultaneously. Moreover, the bootstrapping method has been used to
compute formal statistical tests of the specific indirect effects.
This method generates an estimate of the indirect effect including a 95 per cent
confidence interval. When zero is not in the 95 per cent confidence interval, one can
conclude that the indirect effect is significantly different from zero at p o 0.05 and, thus,
that the effect of the independent variable (i.e. work responsibilities) on the dependent
variable (i.e. emotional exhaustion) is mediated by the proposed mediating variables (i.
e. presenteeism and work-to-family conflict). We included gender, age, job tenure,
number of children and type of contract as control variables in the mediational model.
Presenteeism
on the desk
89
Indirect effects
To work-tofamily
conflict
(WFC)
Estimate
Bias-corrected
bootstrap 95%
confidence interval
Work
responsibilities (WR) 2.987 (0.57)
0.165 (0.07)
0.359 (0.06)
Presenteeism (P)
1.619 (0.53)
0.231 (0.06)
Work-to-family
conflict (WFC)
5.673 (0.57)
Gender (1 female)
3.329 (1.15)
0.305 (0.14)
0.363 (0.13)
Type of contract
(1 permanent job)
1.170 (1.49) 0.051 (0.19)
0.136 (0.17)
No. of children
0.655 (0.53)
0.079 (0.07) 0.092 (0.06)
Age
0.161 (0.12) 0.013 (0.02)
0.008 (0.01)
Job tenure
0.047 (0.10)
0.015 (0.01) 0.018 (0.01)
Total
2.522 (0.49)
1.621; 3.516
WRPEE
0.267 (0.15)
0.036; 0.617
WRWFCEE
2.039 (0.45)
1.228; 2.989
Table II.
WRPWFCEE
0.216 (0.10)
0.038; 0.451
Path coefficients and
Notes: Bootstrap confidence intervals were constructed using 5,000 samples. Total effect
indirect effects for
(WREE) 5.509 (0.66). Standard error in parentheses
mediation models
IJWHM
9,1
90
Work-Family
conflict
0.17 (0.07)
Figure 1.
Mediational analysis
of the links between
work responsibilities
and emotional
exhaustion
5.67 (0.57)
0.36 (0.06)
Work
Responsibilities
1.62 (0.53)
2.99 (0.57)
Emotional
Exhaustion
Note: For clarity reasons paths coefficients from covariates were not inserted.
All paths are significant at least at the level of p < 0.05
social expectancies (i.e. from students, colleagues and school principals); this tendency,
in turn, prompts their perception of conflict between work and family spheres, which
consequently results in higher levels of emotional exhaustion. In a cross-sectional study
on Canadian workers employed in a variety of work positions, Johns (2011) considered
work-to-family conflict as an antecedent of presenteeism and found a positive
relationship between these two constructs arguing that job demands that provoke such
conflict also compel attendance, even in the case of ill-health. However, and our results
seem to support this hypothesis, the contrary is also possible: that is, the tendency of
presenteeism may be expected to be related to increasing work-to-family conflict. This
is primarily because presenteeism restricts opportunities for recuperation (Aronsson
and Gustafsson, 2005). It is common knowledge that adequate recovery from job
pressures is crucial to avoid negative health effects. Typical examples of need for
recovery experiences are that employees find it difficult to relax at the end of a working
day, to start other activities, and to concentrate during their free time after work
(i.e. Van Veldhoven and Meijman, 1994; Winwood et al., 2006). In this sense, it is
possible that work worries can interfere with the possibility of meeting family needs
and increase the perception of work-to-family conflict. Cinamon and Rich (2005) have
reported that, for teachers, to fulfil family and professional roles concurrently is
perceived as a very stressful aspect of their life, with the consequence of chronic lack of
energy necessary to care for ones own children and to be a good teacher. Future
studies should examine the link between the work and family spheres in depth.
Particularly, it will be important to consider the two directions of conflict, namely, the
work-to-family conflict and the family-to-work conflict, as previous studies have begun
to emphasise the practical value of managing both forms with respect to presenteeism
( Johns, 2011).
Although presenteeism may be seen as a sign of high normative commitment, our
results demonstrated that this is detrimental to teachers well-being, because it
encompasses both the private sphere of workers, as well as their perception of
emotional exhaustion. In this sense, it is similar to the nature of workaholism, defined
as the tendency to work excessively hard and being obsessed with work, which
manifests itself in working compulsively (Schaufeli et al., 2008). Like workaholics,
people who show presenteeism seem pushed to their work (Van Beek et al., 2011), as
they are apparently driven by external pressures (i.e. meet others approval and
expectations). In parallel, the level of workaholism is a significant predictor of work-tofamily conflict (Andreassen, 2013; Bonebright et al., 2000) because workaholics are
unable to benefit from relaxation and involvement in non-work activities with
consequences for psychological distress (Brady et al., 2008).
Finally, among control variables, only gender exhibited a significant relationship
with presenteeism; to be specific, in line with Aronssons findings (Aronsson et al., 2000;
Aronsson and Gustafsson, 2005), women tended to show slightly higher presenteeism
than men. Following this trend, female teachers tended to also perceive more emotional
exhaustion and work-to-family conflict.
Conclusion
In an applicative point of view, our results could be incorporated into workplace
policies that add the concept of presenteeism into their measures of employee
well-being or productivity and introduce some strategies in order to prevent it. First,
as Hemp (2004) suggested, it would be important to educate organisations and
employees about the costs and perils of presenteeism within a specific occupational
Presenteeism
on the desk
91
IJWHM
9,1
92
sector, like an educational one and within helping professions. The awareness within
the organisation is the first step to adopt other measures concerning, for example, the
identification of the organisational characteristics related to presenteeism, and
resources to manage illness.
There are some limitations that should be acknowledged. First, data from this study
derived entirely from self-report questionnaires increasing the chances of common
method variance effects. Second, another limit concerns the cross-sectional design of
the study, which prevents us from establishing the direction of the hypothesised causal
relations or reversed causal hypothesis. The serial multiple mediator model assumes a
causal chain linking the mediators, with a specified direction of causal flow. However, a
reciprocal relationship is also possible and future longitudinal research could be
conducted to examine this possibility. Our findings show that the work environment
may play an important role in stimulating the tendency for presenteeism. However,
previous research ( Johns, 2010) emphasised that personal characteristics (e.g. work
attitudes, personality) tend to favour its occurrence. Therefore, we believe that future
studies should contemplate these variables, as well as the role of the work context.
Other limitations include not controlling for the effects of general health, which was
strongly associated with presenteeism ( Johns, 2011), and measuring presenteeism with
a single item. Particularly, our measure provides no information as to when or why
individuals go to work while sick. Although the single-item measure may be considered
a serious weakness of the present research, our measure corresponds to that of
previous studies (Aronsson et al., 2000; Demerouti et al., 2009), which also found a high
test-retest reliability. However, the development of a multi-item scale, as well as more
objective measures of presenteeism, is strongly encouraged.
In conclusion, although this research represents a first attempt at studying a
phenomenon that has not yet been examined deeply in the Italian context, there is a need
for more studies in order to better understand both personal and workplace antecedents
and consequences of presenteeism and improve an instrument for its evaluation.
References
Adams, G.A., King, L.A. and King, D.W. (1996), Relationships of job and family involvement,
family social support, and work-family conflict with job and life satisfaction, Journal of
Applied Psychology, Vol. 81 No. 4, pp. 411-420.
Andreassen, C.S. (2013), Workaholism and work-family spillover in a cross-occupational
sample, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 78-87.
Aronsson, G. and Gustafsson, K. (2005), Sickness presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure
factors, and an outline of a model for research, Journal of Occupational and Environmental
Medicine, Vol. 47 No. 9, pp. 958-966.
Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K. and Dallner, M. (2000), Sick but yet at work: an empirical study of
sickness presenteeism, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 54 No. 7,
pp. 502-509.
Bergstrom, G., Bodin, L., Hagberg, J., Aronsson, G. and Josephson, M. (2009), Sickness
presenteeism today, sickness absenteeism tomorrow? A prospective study on sickness
presenteeism and future sickness absenteeism, Journal of Occupational and
Environmental Medicine, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 629-638.
Bonebright, C.A., Clay, D.L. and Ankenmann, R.D. (2000), The relationship of workaholism with
work-life conflict, satisfaction and purpose in life, Journal of counseling Psychology, Vol. 47
No. 4, pp. 469-477.
Brady, B.R., Vadanovich, S.J. and Rotunda, R. (2008), The impact of workaholism on work-family
conflict, job satisfaction, and perception of leisure activities, The Psychologist-Manager
Journal, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 241-263.
Presenteeism
on the desk
Brislin, R.W., Lonner, W.J. and Thorndike, R.M. (1973), Cross-Cultural Research Methods, Wiley,
New York, NY.
Caverley, N., Cunningham, J.B. and MacGregor, J.N. (2007), Sickness presenteeism, sickness
absenteeism, and health following restructuring in a public service organization, Journal
of Management Studies, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 304-319.
Cicei, C.C. (2012), Examining the effects of work-family conflict: an exploratory study on
sickness presenteeism, Romanian Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 1,
pp. 4-11.
Cinamon, R.G. and Rich, Y. (2005), Work-family conflict among female teachers, Teaching and
Teacher Education, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 365-378.
Collins, J.J., Baase, C.M., Sharda, C.E., Ozminkowski, R.J., Nicholson, S., Billotti, G.M., Turpin, R.S.,
Olson, M. and Berger, M.L. (2005), The assessment of chronic health conditions on work
performance, absence, and total economic impact for employers, Journal of Occupational
and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 547-557.
Cooper, C.L. and Williams, S. (1994), Creating Healthy Work Organizations, Wiley, Chichester.
Deery, S., Walsh, J. and Zatzick, C.D. (2014), A moderated mediation analysis of job demands,
presenteeism, and absenteeism, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,
Vol. 87 No. 2, pp. 352-369.
Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P.M., Bakker, A.B., Schaufeli, W.B. and Hox, J. (2009), Present but sick:
a three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism, and burnout, Career Development
International, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 50-68.
Dew, K., Keefe, V. and Small, K. (2005), Choosing to work when sick: workplace presenteeism,
Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 60 No. 10, pp. 2273-2282.
Drago, R. (2006), Presente e futuro degli insegnanti: rassegna della ricerca internazionale,
Psicologia dellEducazione e della Formazione, Vol. 2, pp. 199-223.
Elbaz-Lubisch, P. (2002), Teachers stories: the personal, the professional- and what is between
them, in Zellermayer, M. and Peri, P. (Eds), Women Teachers in Israel, A Feminist
Perspective, Hakibbutz Hameuchad (Hebrew), Tel-Aviv, pp. 115-133.
Eurofound European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
(2010), Absence from work Germany, available at: www.eurofound.europa.eu/ewco/
studies/tn0911039s/de0911039q.htm (accessed 30 April 2012).
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) (2011), Presenteeism costs twice as
much as costs due to sickness absence, says German study, available at: http://osha.
europa.eu/en/news/de-presenteeism-costs-twice-as-much-as-costs-due-to-sickness-absencesays-german-study (accessed 30 April 2012).
Frone, M.R., Russell, M. and Barnes, G.M. (1996), Work-family conflict, gender, and healthrelated outcomes: a study of employed parents in two community samples, Journal of
Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 57-69.
Frone, M.R., Russell, M. and Cooper, M.J. (1997), Relation of work-family conflict to health
outcomes: a four-year longitudinal study of employed parents, Journal of Occupational
and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 70 No. 4, pp. 325-336.
Grandey, A.A. and Cropanzano, R. (1999), The conservation of resources model applied to
workfamily conflict and strain, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 54 No. 2,
pp. 350-370.
93
IJWHM
9,1
Grant, A.M. (2008), The significance of task significance: job performance effects, relational
mechanisms, and boundary conditions, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 93 No. 1,
pp. 108-124.
Guglielmi, D., Panari, C. and Simbula, S. (2012), The determinants of teachers well-being: the
mediating role of mental fatigue, European Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 7 No. 2,
pp. 204-220.
94
Guglielmi, D., Paplomatas, A., Simbula, S. and Depolo, M. (2011), Prevenzione dello stress lavoro
correlato: validazione di uno strumento per la valutazione dei rischi psicosociali nella
scuola, Psicologia della salute, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 53-74.
Turpin, R.S., Ozminkowski, R.J., Sharda, C.E., Collins, J.J., Berger, M.L., Billotti, G.M., Baase, C.M.,
Olsono, M.J. and Nicholson, S. (2004), Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism
Scale, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 46 No. 11, pp. 1123-1133.
Van Beek, I., Taris, T.W. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2011), Workaholic and work engaged employees:
dead ringers or worlds apart?, Journal of Ocuupational Health Psychology, Vol. 16 No. 4,
pp. 468-482.
Van Veldhoven, M. and Meijman, T. (1994), Het meten van psychosociale arbeidsbelasting met een
vragenlijst: de Vragenlijst Beleving en Beoordeling van de Arbeid (VVBA). (Measurement of
Psychosocial Job Demands with a Questionnaire: The Questionnaire Experience and
Evaluation of Work (VBBA)), NIA, Amsterdam.
Widera, E., Chang, A. and Chen, H.L. (2010), Presenteeism: a public health hazard, Journal of
General Internal Medicine, Vol. 25 No. 11, pp. 1244-1247.
Winwood, P.C., Winefield, A.H. and Lushington, K. (2006), Workrelated fatigue and recovery:
the contribution of age, domestic responsibilities and shiftwork, Journal of Advanced
Nursing, Vol. 56 No. 4, pp. 438-449.
Wrate, R.M. (1999), Increase in staff numbers may reduce doctors presenteeism, British Medical
Journal, Vol. 319 No. 7223, p. 1502.
About the authors
Chiara Panari, PhD, is a Researcher at the University of Parma, where she teaches work and
organisational psychology. Her research interests and scientific papers concern the quality of
working life, psychosocial risk factors and work-related stress. Chiara Panari is the
corresponding author and can be contacted at: chiara.panari@unipr.it
Silvia Simbula, PhD, is a Researcher at the University of Milano-Bicocca where she teaches
organisational communication. She has published papers on job stress, burnout, engagement and
quality of working life.
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
Presenteeism
on the desk
95