Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Chiropractic
Journal
January-February- March
2015
1
Vice President
James Bogash, DC
info@lifecarechiro.com
480-839-2273
Treasurer
Secretary
Jennifer Polk, DC
dr.jenpolk@yahoo.com
480-941-1555
Executive Delegate
Kurt vonRice, DC
drbones62@earthlink.com
602-493-8700
Delegate
Terese Farrar, DC
doctor@happydancing.com
623-975-4057
Delegate
Kurt vonRice, DC
drbones62@earthlink.com
602-493-8700
Delegate
Michael Stone, DC
docstone@qwest.net
520-490-9827
Delegate
Melissa Myhr, DC
m3doc@aim.com
623-878-0475
Delegate
A. Allen Gentry, DC
drgentry@gentrychiropt.com
520-745-0545
Delegate
Don Dearth
drdearth@qwestoffice.net
480-756-6044
Delegate
Joanne Siebert, DC
drjoannesiebert@gmail.com
720-206-9906
Delegate
Marc Widoff
480-688-1894
Contents:
Pg. 2: 2014-2015 Executive Committee and District Delegates
Pg. 4: Dr. Bogashs Monthly Rant
Pg. 5: Convention - Save the Date!!
Pg. 6-9: Gardisil Vaccine Protecting Children or Hurting them?
Pg. 10: Article from Don Dearth, DC
Pg. 12-13: AAC Lobbyist News
Pg. 14-15: Under-Coding; One of the Most Misunderstood Violations in the Business
Pg. 17-18: Amp Up for ICD-10 CM
Pg. 19-20: Is Your Head Where it Should Be?
Pg. 23-25: Calendar of Events
Pg. 26: Ounces Vs. Pounds
Pg. 27-28: How much is too much fish oil?
Pg. 29-30: Quick Pick Me Up Posture
BOARD COMPLAINT?
I CAN HELP!
David M. Morrison, P.C.
Attorney
Dr. Perenich is 2013 graduate of National University of Health Sciences. He also has BS in psychology, a BA in theology, and an MA in religion. He currently practices in Clearwater, Florida. He can
be reached at tp161@hotmail.com.
During the 2012 Republican Primary Debates Congresswoman Michele Bachmann took Texas Governor Rick Perry to task for using an executive order to require teenage girls to take the HPV
(human paillomavirus) vaccine commonly known as Gardasil or Cervarix. In the debate Bachmann
suggested that the vaccine was harmful for girls and that it may have been responsible for the mental retardation of a young teen. Subsequently, Bachmann was attacked in the media for making outrageous claims toward a vaccine considered safe and effective. i The CDC (Centers for Disease
Control) at the time went on the defense and put out information stating that 35 million doses of
Gardasil as of June 22, 2011 had been given and only 18,727 reports of adverse events were made.
Moreover, according to the CDC, 92% of these reports were non-serious symptoms like fainting,
pain, and swelling at the injection site (the arm), headache, nausea, and fever. ii Additionally two
bioethics professors from the University of Minnesota, Steven Miles and Arthur Caplan, challenged
Bachmann even offering her money if she could provide evidence of her claims. iii Eventually the attack by the CDC, the bioethics professors, and media took its toll and Bachmann bowed out. To this
day the CDC and the professors from Minnesota maintain their position that the HPV vaccine is safe
and effective. But is this so?
Vaccines more than any other medical intervention receives the highest degree of cultural credulity.
Society is not only ingrained with the belief vaccines single handedly are responsible for saving
countless lives from dreaded diseases, but also are generally regarded as safe. Since vaccines are assumed to be safe and effective most reports of advers reactions are usually dismissed. Those that do
get reported are often such a small subsection of the actual incidence that there is no way of knowing how many serious adverse reactions are taking place. Even David Kessler former FDA commissioner admitted that only 6% of all vaccine adverse events are reported. 5 Nonetheless, the public is
continually assured by mainstream media and government outlets that the HPV vaccine is safe and
effective.
Commenting on the safety bias as it pertains to vaccines one researcher wrote: [r]esearch into immunization has been based on the theory that the benefits of immunization far outweigh the risks
from delayed adverse events and so long term safety studies do not need to be performed. iv In
some instances this bias leads to outright falsehoods in disseminating pro-vaccination information to
physicians. In a continuing medical education (CME) course sponsored by Merck designed to increase the vaccination rates amongst children, the powerpoint material stated, under the heading
Talking to Parents About Vaccine Safety, the following talking points: 1) HPV vaccines are
among the safest (vaccines) 2 46 million doses distributed (of the HPV vaccine) in the United
States with no serious safety concerns.v Apparently the CME team at Merck designing the proHPV vaccine powerpoint was not concerned with the facts when making such statements.
The ingredients list provided by the CDC for both HPV vaccines (Gardasil and cerverix) demonstrate they each contain aluminum compounds as an adjuvant. One of these compounds, aluminum
hydroxide, has been implicated in joint pain, chronic fatigue, and cognitive decline. vi The mechanism of injury from this adjuvant is said to be caused by macrophagic myofasciitis a condition of
which occurs when macrophages consume aluminum and dump their inflammatory chemistry in
response.6 When animals are injected with aluminum hydroxide they have symptoms and histological damage which resembles diseases like Alzheimers and upper motor neuron lesions like ALS
(amylotrophic lateral sclerosis - the ice bucket challenge disease).vii
In the same vein the scientific literature reveals a number of reports associating neurological disease
and death with the HPV vaccine. While many of these reports still retain a vaccine safety bias, they
all indicate paucity of post vaccination surveillance and the need for heightened awareness of vaccine induced disease. A case study published in Neurology (2012) noted the association between neuromyelitis optica (the sometimes precursor to multiple sclerosis) in four young girls after HPV vaccination.viii While the researches clearly sided in favor of pro-vaccine bias they admitted such findings
were troubling because the information pertaining to post vaccination surveillance is limited. Thus,
they have no way of knowing the true incidence and severity of neuromyelitis optica amongst the
vaccinated and neither do they know the long-term effects of the HPV vaccine.
Another case published by Tomljenovic and Shaw investigating the histopathology of two teenage
females 19 and 14 years of age who died after getting their HPV shots. They found, after laboriously
looking at the brain tissue of the girls who died, evidence of vaccine induced cerebral vasculitis. ix
They concluded that specific antigens in the vaccine most likely caused a fatal autoimmune reaction
in these young women. The death of two teenage girls for the supposed benefit of cervical cancer
protection is hardly scientific, logical or even a noble sacrifice for the greater good.
If autoimmune disease and death are not bad enough the BMJ published a case report of a 16 year
old girl who suffered from ovarian failure after HPV vaccination. x Disturbingly, researches examining the case were unable to get histological data from rat ovaries from which the HPV vaccine was
originally tested, even after filing a freedom of information act request. Worse of all they admit that
a number of variables make it difficult for them to assess just how many girls may lose or lost the
ability to have children due to this vaccine. How could a vaccine like this be worth the risk of never
having children versus the small risk of cervical cancer? It is interesting to point out that if any alternative therapy (chiropractic, acupuncture, herbal medicine, or hydrotherapy) was associated with
just a handful of cases of neuromyelitis optica, MS, death and female infertility it would be banned
from the USA and its practitioners would be jailed or fined out of existence.
On June 14, 2013, after looking at the evidence in favor of the HPV vaccine and reports of adverse
reactions following it, the pro-vaccine government of Japan decided not to recommend this vaccine
for its young girls. Despite all these facts pro-vaccine proponents will continue to parrot the mantra
that vaccines are safe and effective.
In addition to the serious adverse events caused by the vaccine, evidence suggests it may not be effective in preventing cervical cancer. Dr. Diane Harper MD a principal investigator in the HPV vaccine trials sponsored by GSK and MERCK has argued that regular pap screening for women at the
age of 21 for life is more effective to prevent cervical cancer than the HPV vaccine. xi Additionally she
pointed out rates of cervical cancer in the United States are nearly as high as rates of adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine in those who received it. 11 Moreover, the vaccine itself does not have lasting protection so giving the shots to young non-sexually active girls is futile. Studies demonstrate
that any protective value of the vaccine lasts maybe five years. 11 ~ Continued on page 9
8
And, the vaccine does not protect from all the various HPV viruses which can cause cancer. However, Harper, is probably most emphatic, with her criticism toward the vaccine when she points out
95% of all HPV infections are cleared spontaneously by the bodys immune system. The remaining
5% progress to cancer precursorsGardasil is not really a cervical cancer vaccine. The vaccine prevents HPV infection not the development of cervical cancer. 11
With Harper being such a credible expert on both HPV and the HPV vaccine, one has to wonder
why the public did not hear more from her? Why arent doctors who give vaccines made aware of
her cogent analysis and expert opinion? Perhaps it is because the pharmaceutical industry and governmental regulatory agencies have a vested interest in saving face. For they know if they public
was aware of such things billions of dollars would be lost from unused vaccines due to a decline in
public trust in vaccination.
Nevertheless, the media and supposed academic experts who gave Michele Bachmann an unmitigated drumming for her comments concerning the Gardasil have never retracted their statements
despite the mounting evidence in opposition to the safe and effective mantra. Though politicians get their facts wrong occasionally and make off-the-cuff statements, apparently so does the
media and academics who attempt to shield themselves with the banner of science while making
unsubstantiated claims in favor of vaccine safety and efficacy. Thus no matter what one decides for
their daughter and now also their son, regarding the HPV vaccine, they should do their research instead of trusting politicians and mainstream media outlets.
Weiner R. Bachmann claims HPV vaccine might cause mental retardation. The Washington Post.
9/13/2011 (Found at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/michele-bachmann-continues-perry-attack-claims-hpv-vaccine-might-causemental-retardation/2011/09/13/gIQAbJBcPK_blog.html)
ii Amira D. Debunking Michele Bachmanns HPV Anecdote. New York Magazine. September 13, 2011 (http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2011/09/
gardasil_hpv_vaccine_bachmann_perry.html)
iii Perry S. Bioethicists Miles and Caplan Challenge Bachmanns HPV-vaccine claim. MinnPOST. September 15, 2011 (http://www.minnpost.com/
second-opinion/2011/09/bioethicists-miles-and-caplan-challenge-bachmanns-hpv-vaccine-claim) [http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Vaccines/HPV/
Index.html]
iv Clausen JB. Letter: Public should be told that vaccines may have long term adverse effects. BMJ. 1999; 318:190-6.
v Schaffner W. Adolescent Immunizations: A Back-to-School Checklist. Medscape CME Accessed 7/14/2012.
vi Couette M, et al. Long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide is associated with chronic cognitive dysfunction. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry. 2009; 103:1571 - 1578.
vii Shaw CA, Petrik MS. Aluminum Hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry.
November 2009; 103(11):1555.
viii Menge T, Cree B, Saleh A, Waterboer, Berthele A, Kalluri SR, et al. Neuromyelitis optica following human papillomavirus vaccination. Neurology.
July 17, 2012; 79
ix Tomljenovic L, Shaw CA. Death after Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination: Causal or Coincidental. Pharmaceut Reg Affairs.
2012;S12:001
x Little DT, Ward HRG. Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination. BMJ Case
Reports. 2012; doi:10.1136/bcr-2012-006879
xi Yerman MG. An Interview with Dr. Diane M. Harper, HPV Expert. Huffpost: Healthy Living. March 18, 2010 (Accessed at http://
www.huffingtonpost.com/marcia-g-yerman/an-interview-with-dr-dian-b405472.html).
i
10
11
There will be some new and some not so new in Arizona State Government when the
Legislature convenes on January 12th. The personality of the Arizona House and Senate is
pretty much the same as it has been during the past two years. Yes we have a new Governor
in outgoing State Treasurer and businessman Republican Doug Ducey and a new Speaker in
Cochise County Republican David Gowen. But we also have returning Republican Senate
President Andy Biggs and the Republican majorities remain the same with a 36 to 24 count
in the House and a 17 to 13 count in the Senate.
So just what can we expect from during the 2015 Regular Session? First and foremost
are the states budget woes. The Arizona economic recovery from the Great Recession has
been weaker than has been enjoyed in most of the rest of the country. Revenue during the
last six or so months of calendar 2014 have been well below what had been expected when
the current fiscal 2015 budget was adopted in April Barring an unforeseen and most likely
unexpected economic boost the budget will start at perhaps $200 million or more in the red.
Add to that a recent court decision that declared that some of the recessionary cuts in
K-12 education were unconstitutional. That decision will require that the Legislature - beginning in the current fiscal 2014 budget - increase school spending funding to the tune of over
$300 million. The Governor and Legislature faces the daunting task, therefore, of having to
tackle a one half billion dollar deficit - a hole that has to be plugged as soon as they take office.
For the Chiropractic community that means that any proposals that are perceived to
add additional costs to state government will likely not have a warm reception. It also means
that existing agency funds could be in jeopardy. Already we are hearing some legislators
suggest that sweeps are inevitable. So for regulatory agencies, like the Board of Chiropractic
examiners any unexpended funds that are expected to remain unused by the June 30th end
of fiscal year could be swept into the general fund to help plug that previous mentioned
hole.
It is important to remember that the board operates on funds collected as licensing
fees by chiropractors. While no one wants to pay fees the fact is that the chiropractic community wants fair competent regulation and understands that those fees that they pay will go to
that level of oversight. But when those funds are swept then the licensing fees become de
facto professional service taxes. That is something that makes us very uncomfortable.
12
Which brings us to the legislation that the Board will be proposing when the session commences. The focus of that bill is to allow on new fees with modest increases henceforth to be set
by Board rule. In and of itself this is not an unreasonable request. The Board has in fact been
hamstrung by a lack of funds for the past several years. But if this increase in fees comes on the
heels of fund sweeps then we may have to rethink how benign those increases actually are.
Also of interest in the coming session could be renewed consideration to allow AHCCCS
patients to be covered for chiropractic care. Remember that at the end of last session that proposal was in the original Senate passed budget but failed to survive the final enactment when
the House added emergency dental, podiatry, and other services.
We did not coordinate with other health care professionals also seeking AHCCCS coverage last session. Other than the AAC proposed SB 1044 which would have provided AHCCCS
patients with chiropractic coverage no other bill on this subject was even introduced. This year
we are starting as a united group with a commitment to throw no one overboard as we pursue a joint effort to get chiropractic, podiatry, emergency dental and orthotics added to permissible AHCCCS coverage.
Generally the legislature perceives that this will add an initial cost, as existing capitation
rates do not include these services. But the fact remains that if AHCCCS administrators were
willing to adjust capitation rates there likely would be no additional cost to its enactment.
Other issues of importance to the chiropractic community are likely to come up in the legislative session and we will be advising you of those and what the AAC is doing to protect chiropractic as 2015 unfolds.
13
Keep in mind, the OIG doesnt care why the doctor took action. So if a DC, no matter how
lovingly and kindly, tries to help out a cash or underinsured patient by coding for a lesser
service or fewer services than were actually performed and charges accordingly, theyre in
hot water, no matter how nice they may have been trying to be.
Theres a safe way to offer discounts to help out patients and there are an almost infinite
number of illegal ways to do so. Among the latter, under-coding is possibly the most tricky,
because doctors think that by under- instead of over-coding, theyre flying under OIG radar.
Nothing could be further than the truth. Under-coding, is, quite simply, fraud. It represents
discriminatory billing, which carries not only the taint of a dual fee scheduleone for cash
patients, the other for Medicare and third-party payersbut also can be viewed as a kickback or inducement. After all, Medicare defines inducement as offering any free or reduced
service to a patient to encourage providing a service that would be covered by Medicare.
14
Under-coding can also be considered abuse as defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): misusing codes on a claim. Since under-coding almost always takes the form of
overreliance upon the same lower value codes, the flag that pattern raises isnt just red, but flashing
like a stoplight: if your coding shows the same low value codes showing up over and over again,
you might as well be wearing a sign that says, Please audit me!
Happily, no doctor need resort to under-coding to make their care more affordable to uninsured,
underinsured or partially insured patients. Thats why I started ChiroHealthUSA, a Discount Medical Provider Organization (DMPO) that allows participating doctors to set legal discounts of their
choosing for member patients. Theres no cost to the doctor, and a mere $39 per year per family
charge to the patient.
Every Tuesday, we give a free webinar explaining the benefits of joining ChiroHealthUSA. You can
register at www.chirohealthusa.com.
Dr. Ray Foxworth is a certified Medical Compliance Spe-cialist and President of ChiroHealthUSA. A practicing Chiropractor, he remains in the trenches facing challenges with billing, coding, documentation and compliance. He has served as president of the Mis-sissippi Chiropractic Association, former Staff Chiro-practor at
the G.V. Sonny Montgomery VA Medical Center and is a Fellow of the International College of Chiropractic.
You can contact Dr. Foxworth at 1-888-719-9990, info@chirohealthusa.com or visit the ChiroHealthUSA
website at www.chirohealthusa.com. Join us for a free webinar that will give you all the details about how a
DMPO can help you practice with more peace of mind. Go to www.chirohealthusa.com to register today.
15
16
Using ICD-10, doctors can capture much more information, meaning they can better understand important details about the patients health than with ICD-9-CM. Moreover, the level of detail that is
provided for by ICD-10 means researchers and public health officials can better track diseases and
health outcomes. ICD-10 reflects improved diagnosis of chronic illness and identifies underlying
causes, complications of disease, and conditions that contribute to the complexity of a disease. Additionally, ICD-10 captures the severity and stage of diseases.
The previous revision, ICD-9-CM, contains outdated, obsolete terms that are inconsistent with current medical practice, new technology, and preventative services.
ICD-10 represents a significant change that impacts the entire health care community. As such,
much of the industry has already invested resources toward the implementation of ICD-10. CMS has
implemented a comprehensive testing approach, including end-to-end testing in 2015, to help ensure providers are ready. While many providers, have completed the necessary system changes to
transition to ICD-10, the time offered by Congress and this rule will allow others to take advantage
of the training offered to ensure all providers are ready.
17
18
19
Emerson Ecologics
800-654-4432
cs@emersonecologics.com
www.emersonecologics.com
ChiroHealth USA
Kristine Hudson
(888) 719-9990
Kristi@chirohealthusa.com
Standard Process
Southwest Nutrition, Inc.
Dan Schwerdtfeger
20235 N. Cave Creek Rd. Ste # 104-491
Phoenix, AZ 85024
(480) 231-7700
spswn@spswn.com
SignaPay Ltd.
105 Deck Ct. 650
Irving, TX 75062
(800) 944-1399
DC Online
Karen Moreau
3578 Hartsel Dr. Unit # E 414
Colorado Springs, Co 80920
Americans Business Benefit Association
Karen Evjen
1490 S. Price Rd. Ste 218
Chandler, AZ 85286
(480) 588-6110
kevjen@abbaplans.com
21
You can quickly and easily post your classified ad today by visiting us online!!!
No need to wait for proofs, or editorial changes; go online, create your own classified
ad at www.azchiropractic.org
Full Page
1/2 Page
1/3 Page
1/4 Page
1/8 Page
Bi Monthly Newsletter Sponsorship
$200.00
$130.00
$90.00
$75.00
$50.00
$150.00
$260.00
$150.00
$120.00
$95.00
$70.00
$200.00
22
$150.00
$60.00/Blast
$50.00
SUNDAY
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
ACLC ~
23
24
30
31
TENATIVE ~
FULL BOARD
MEETING
25
26
27
28
29
MONDAY
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
OF STRESS
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
18
19
20
21
27
28
NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
OF STRESS
15
EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE
MEETING
22
23
24
25
26
24
MONDAY
TUESDAY
WEDNESDAY
THURSDAY
FRIDAY
SATURDAY
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
27
28
FULL BOARD
MEETING
22
23
24
29
30
31
25
26
25
26
27
29
30
MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION
CONTACT AAC FOR MORE DETAIL ON PAYMENT OPTIONS OR REGISTER ONLINE!!
____My check is enclosed for my full annual dues $___________
____Please invoice me monthly for my dues (3 mo. required in advance to activate)
____Charge my credit card for my total annual dues of $__________
____Charge my credit card monthly until further notice for my dues.
(Adjust the amount on or about my anniversary date, if necessary, consistent with
AACs published pricing structure)
VISA
Last Name
M/C Discover
First Name
Office Address
Office Phone:
American Express
Middle Name
City
State
AZ License #
Zip
Office Fax:
Clinic Name
Email Address
Date of Graduation
Yrs of practice in AZ
*Retired Membership
*Out-of-state DC Membership
Todays Date
Signature
Elect to Donate to the Legislative Fund: 20.00 40.00 60.00 100.00 1 time Donation of $________________
31
Address:
Phone:
Fax:
Email:
Website:
32