Sie sind auf Seite 1von 13

CHAPTER 21

LEASING
Answers to Concepts Review and Critical Thinking Questions
1.

Some key differences are: (1) Lease payments are fully tax-deductible, but only the interest
portion of the loan is; (2) The lessee does not own the asset and cannot depreciate it for tax
purposes; (3) In the event of a default, the lessor cannot force bankruptcy; and (4) The
lessee does not obtain title to the asset at the end of the lease (absent some additional
arrangement).

2.

The less profitable one because leasing provides, among other things, a mechanism for
transferring tax benefits from entities that value them less to entities that value them more.

3.

Potential problems include: (1) Care must be taken in interpreting the IRR (a high or low
IRR is preferred depending on the setup of the analysis); and (2) Care must be taken to
ensure the IRR under examination is not the implicit interest rate just based on the lease
payments.

4.

a.
b.
c.

Leasing is a form of secured borrowing. It reduces a firms cost of capital only if it is


cheaper than other forms of secured borrowing. The reduction of uncertainty is not
particularly relevant; what matters is the NAL.
The statement is not always true. For example, a lease often requires an advance lease
payment or security deposit and may be implicitly secured by other assets of the firm.
Leasing would probably not disappear, since it does reduce the uncertainty about
salvage value and the transactions costs of transferring ownership. However, the use
of leasing would be greatly reduced.

5.

A lease must be disclosed on the balance sheet if one of the following criteria is met:
1. The lease transfers ownership of the asset by the end of the lease. In this case, the
firm essentially owns the asset and will have access to its residual value.
2. The lessee can purchase the asset at a price below its fair market value (bargain
purchase option) when the lease ends. The firm essentially owns the asset and will
have access to most of its residual value.
3. The lease term is for 75% or more of the estimated economic life of the asset. The
firm basically has access to the majority of the benefits of the asset, without any
responsibility for the consequences of its disposal.
4. The present value of the lease payments is 90% or more of the fair market value of
the asset at the start of the lease. The firm is essentially purchasing the asset on an
installment basis.

6.

The lease must meet the following IRS standards for the lease payments to be tax
deductible:
1. The lease term must be less than 80% of the economic life of the asset. If the term is
longer, the lease is considered to be a conditional sale.
2. The lease should not contain a bargain purchase option, which the IRS interprets as an
equity interest in the asset.
3. The lease payment schedule should not provide for very high payments early and very
low payments late in the life of the lease. This would indicate that the lease is being
used simply to avoid taxes.

4.

Renewal options should be reasonable and based on the fair market value of the asset
at renewal time. This indicates that the lease is for legitimate business purposes, not
tax avoidance.

7.

As the term implies, off-balance sheet financing involves financing arrangements that are
not required to be reported on the firms balance sheet. Such activities, if reported at all,
appear only in the footnotes to the statements. Operating leases (those that do not meet the
criteria in Question 6) provide off-balance sheet financing. For accounting purposes, total
assets will be lower and some financial ratios may be artificially high. Financial analysts
are generally not fooled by such practices. There are no economic consequences, since the
cash flows of the firm are not affected by how the lease is treated for accounting purposes.

8.

The lessee may not be able to take advantage of the depreciation tax shield and may not be
able to obtain favorable lease arrangements for passing on the tax shield benefits. The
lessee might also need the cash flow from the sale to meet immediate needs, but will be
able to meet the lease obligation cash flows in the future.

9.

Since the relevant cash flows are all aftertax, the aftertax discount rate is appropriate.

10. Japan Airlines financial position was such that the package of leasing and buying probably
resulted in the overall best aftertax cost. In particular, Japan Airlines may not have been in
a position to use all of its tax credits and also may not have had the credit strength to
borrow and buy the plane without facing a credit downgrade and/or substantially higher
rates.
11. There is the tax motive, but, beyond this, Genesis Lease Limited knows that, in the event
of a default, Japan Airlines would relinquish the plane, which would then be re-leased.
Fungible assets, such as planes, which can be readily reclaimed and redeployed are good
candidates for leasing.
12. The plane will be re-leased to Japan Airlines or another air transportation firm, used by
Genesis Lease Limited, or it will simply be sold. There is an active market for used
aircraft.
Solutions to Questions and Problems
NOTE: All end of chapter problems were solved using a spreadsheet. Many problems require
multiple steps. Due to space and readability constraints, when these intermediate steps are
included in this solutions manual, rounding may appear to have occurred. However, the final
answer for each problem is found without rounding during any step in the problem.
Basic
1.

We will calculate cash flows from the depreciation tax shield first. The depreciation tax shield
is:
Depreciation tax shield = ($4,500,000/4)(.35) = $393,750
The aftertax cost of the lease payments will be:
Aftertax lease payment = ($1,350,000)(1 .35) = $877,500

So, the total cash flows from leasing are:


OCF = $393,750 + 877,500 = $1,271,250
The aftertax cost of debt is:
Aftertax debt cost = .08(1 .35) = .052
Using all of this information, we can calculate the NAL as:
NAL = $4,500,000 $1,271,250(PVIFA5.20%,4) = $13,074.25
The NAL is positive so you should lease.
2.

If we assume the lessor has the same cost of debt and the same tax rate, the NAL to the
lessor is the negative of our companys NAL, so:
NAL = $13,074.25

3.

To find the maximum lease payment that would satisfy both the lessor and the lessee, we
need to find the payment that makes the NAL equal to zero. Using the NAL equation and
solving for the OCF, we find:
NAL = 0 = $4,500,000 OCF(PVIFA5.20%,4)
OCF = $1,274,954.24
The OCF for this lease is composed of the depreciation tax shield cash flow, as well as the
aftertax lease payment. Subtracting out the depreciation tax shield cash flow we calculated
earlier, we find:
Aftertax lease payment = $1,274,954.24 393,750 = $881,204.24
Since this is the aftertax lease payment, we can now calculate the breakeven pretax lease
payment as:
Breakeven lease payment = $881,204.24/(1 .35) = $1,355,698.83

4.

If the tax rate is zero, there is no depreciation tax shield foregone. Also, the aftertax lease
payment is the same as the pretax payment, and the aftertax cost of debt is the same as the
pretax cost. So:
Cost of debt = .08
Annual cost of leasing = leasing payment = $1,350,000
The NAL to leasing with these assumptions is:
NAL = $4,500,000 $1,350,000(PVIFA8%,4) = $28,628.77

5.

We already calculated the breakeven lease payment for the lessor in Problem 3. The
assumptions about the lessor concerning the tax rate have not changed. So, the lessor
breaks even with a payment of $1,355,698.83
For the lessee, we need to calculate the breakeven lease payment which results in a zero
NAL. Using the assumptions in Problem 4, we find:
NAL = 0 = $4,500,000 PMT(PVIFA8%,4)
PMT = $1,358,643.62
So, the range of lease payments that would satisfy both the lessee and the lessor are:
Total payment range = $1,355,698.83 to $1,358,643.62

6.

The appropriate depreciation percentages for a 3-year MACRS class asset can be found in
Chapter 6. The depreciation percentages are 0.333, 0.444, 0.148, and 0.074. The cash flows
from leasing are:
Year 1: ($4,500,000)(.333)(.35) + $877,500 = $1,401,975
Year 2: ($4,500,000)(.444)(.35) + $877,500 = $1,576,800
Year 3: ($4,500,000)(.148)(.35) + $877,500 = $1,110,600
Year 4: ($4,500,000)(.074)(.35) + $877,500 = $994,050
NAL = $4,500,000 $1,401,975/1.052 $1,576,800/1.0522 $1,110,600/1.0523
$994,050/1.0524
NAL = $22,969.80
The machine should not be leased. However, notice that the NAL is higher because of the
accelerated tax benefits due to depreciation. It is possible that the accelerated depreciation
benefits could make the NAL positive when compared to straight-line depreciation.

7.

We will calculate cash flows from the depreciation tax shield first. The depreciation tax shield
is:
Depreciation tax shield = ($435,000/5)(.35) = $30,450
The aftertax cost of the lease payments will be:
Aftertax lease payment = ($107,500)(1 .35) = $69,875
So, the total cash flows from leasing are:
OCF = $30,450 + 69,875 = $100,325
The aftertax cost of debt is:
Aftertax debt cost = .09(1 .35) = .0585
Using all of this information, we can calculate the NAL as:
NAL = $435,000 $85,730(PVIFA5.85%,5) = $10,664.52
The NAL is positive, so the company should lease.

8.

a.

Since the lessee has an effective tax rate of zero, there is no depreciation tax shield
foregone. Also, the aftertax lease payment is the same as the pretax payment, and the
aftertax cost of debt is the same as the pretax cost. To find the most the lessee would
pay, we set the NAL equal to zero and solve for the payment, doing so, we find the
most the lessee will pay is:
NAL = 0 = $780,000 PMT(PVIFA7%,5)
PMT = $190,234.74

b. We will calculate cash flows from the depreciation tax shield first. The depreciation tax
shield is:
Depreciation tax shield = ($780,000/5)(.35) = $54,600
The aftertax cost of debt is:
Aftertax debt cost = .07(1 .35) = .0455
Using all of this information, we can calculate the minimum lease payment for the
lessor as:
NAL = 0 = $780,000 PMT(1 .35)(PVIFA4.55%,5) + $54,600(PVIFA4.55%,5)
PMT = $189,730.94
c.

A lease payment less than $189,730.94 will give the lessor a negative NAL. A
payment higher than $190,234.74 will give the lessee a negative NAL. In either case,
no deal will be struck. Therefore, these represent the lower and upper bounds of
possible lease prices during negotiations.
Intermediate

9.

The pretax cost savings are not relevant to the lease versus buy decision, since the firm will
definitely use the equipment and realize the savings regardless of the financing choice
made. The depreciation tax shield is:
Depreciation tax shield lost = ($7,000,000/5)(.34) = $476,000
And the aftertax lease payment is:
Aftertax lease payment = $1,650,000(1 .34) = $1,089,000
The aftertax cost of debt is:
Aftertax debt cost = .09(1 .34) = .0594 or 5.94%
With these cash flows, the NAL is:
NAL = $7,000,000 1,089,000 $1,089,000(PVIFA5.94%,4) $476,000(PVIFA5.94%,5) =
$123,947.57
The equipment should be leased.

To find the maximum payment, we find where the NAL is equal to zero, and solve for the
payment. Using X to represent the maximum payment:
NAL = 0 = $7,000,000 X(1.0594)(PVIFA5.94%,5) $476,000(PVIFA5.94%,5)
X = $1,116,729.56
So the maximum pretax lease payment is:
Pretax lease payment = $1,116,729.56/(1 .34) = $1,692,014.48
10. The aftertax residual value of the asset is an opportunity cost to the leasing decision,
occurring at the end of the project life (year 5). Also, the residual value is not really a debtlike cash flow, since there is uncertainty associated with it at year 0. Nevertheless, although
a higher discount rate may be appropriate, well use the aftertax cost of debt to discount the
residual value as is common in practice. Setting the NAL equal to zero:
NAL = 0 = $7,000,000 X(1.0594)(PVIFA5.94%,5) 476,000(PVIFA5.94%,5)
700,000/1.05945
X = $999,374.14
So, the maximum pretax lease payment is:
Pretax lease payment = $999,374.14/(1 .34) = $1,514,203.24
11. The security deposit is a cash outflow at the beginning of the lease and a cash inflow at the
end of the lease when it is returned. The NAL with these assumptions is:
NAL = $7,000,000 500,000 1,089,000 $1,089,000(PVIFA5.94%,4)
$476,000(PVIFA5.94%,5)
+ $500,000/1.05945
NAL = $1,364.10
With the security deposit, the firm should buy the equipment since the NAL is less than
zero. We could also solve this problem another way. From Problem 9, we know that the
NAL without the security deposit is $123,947.57, so, if we find the present value of the
security deposit, we can simply add this to $123,947.57. The present value of the security
deposit is:
PV of security deposit = $500,000 + $500,000/1.05945 = $125,311.67
So, the NAL with the security deposit is:
NAL = $123,947.57 125,311.67 = $1,364.10
12. The lessee is paying taxes, so will forego the depreciation tax shield if it leases the
equipment. The depreciation tax shield for the lessee is:
Depreciation tax shield = ($2,600,000 / 6)(.25)
Depreciation tax shield = $108,333.33

The aftertax cost of debt for the lessee is:


Aftertax debt cost = .09(1 .25) = .0675
Using all of this information, we can calculate the maximum pretax lease payment for the
lessee as:
NAL = 0 = $2,600,000 PMT(1 .25)(PVIFA6.75%,6) + $108,333.33(PVIFA6.75%,6)
PMT = $577,243.94
For the lessor, the depreciation tax shield is:
Depreciation tax shield = ($2,600,000 / 6)(.40)
Depreciation tax shield = $173,333.33
The aftertax cost of debt for the lessor is:
Aftertax debt cost = .09(1 .40) = .0540
Using all of this information, we can calculate the minimum pretax lease payment for the
lessor as:
NAL = 0 = $2,600,000 PMT(1 .40)(PVIFA5.40%,6) + $173,333.33(PVIFA5.40%,6)
PMT = $575,805.54
13. a.

Since both companies have the same tax rate, there is only one lease payment that
will result in a zero NAL for each company. We will calculate cash flows from the
depreciation tax shield first. The depreciation tax shield is:
Depreciation tax shield = ($475,000/3)(.34) = $53,833.33
The aftertax cost of debt is:
Aftertax debt cost = .10(1 .34) = .0660
Using all of this information, we can calculate the lease payment as:
NAL = 0 = $475,000 PMT(1 .34)(PVIFA6.60%,3) + $53,833.33(PVIFA6.60%,3)
PMT = $190,674.18

b.

To generalize the result from part a:


Let T1 denote the lessors tax rate.
Let T2 denote the lessees tax rate.
Let P denote the purchase price of the asset.
Let D equal the annual depreciation expense.
Let N denote the length of the lease in years.
Let R equal the pretax cost of debt.
The value to the lessor is:

t 1

ValueLessor =

L(1 T1 ) D(T1 )
[1 R(1 T1 )]t

And the value to the lessee is:

P
ValueLessee =

t 1

L(1 T2 ) D(T2 )
[1 R(1 T2 )]t

T1

T2

Since all the values in both equations above are the same except
and
, we can
see that the values of the lease to its two parties will be opposite in sign only if T 1 =
T2.
c.

Since the lessors tax bracket is unchanged, the zero NAL lease payment is the same
as we found in part a. The lessee will not realize the depreciation tax shield, and the
aftertax cost of debt will be the same as the pretax cost of debt. So, the lessees
maximum lease payment will be:
NAL = 0 = $475,000 + PMT(PVIFA10%,3)
PMT = $191,004.53
Both parties have positive NAL for lease payments between $190,674.18 and
$191,004.53.

14. The decision to buy or lease is made by looking at the incremental cash flows. The loan
offered by the bank merely helps you to establish the appropriate discount rate. Since the
deal they are offering is the same as the market-wide rate, you can ignore the offer and
simply use 9 percent as the pretax discount rate. In any capital budgeting project, you do
not consider the financing which was to be applied to a specific project. The only
exception would be if a specific and special financing deal were tied to a specific project
(like a lower-than-market interest rate loan if you buy a particular car).

a.

The incremental cash flows from leasing the machine are the lease payments, the tax
savings on the lease, the lost depreciation tax shield, and the saved purchase price of
the machine. The lease payments are due at the beginning of each year, so the
incremental cash flows are:
Year 0
Lease:
Lease payment
Tax savings on lease
Lost dep. tax shield
Equipment cost

$1,500,000
525,000
5,100,000
$4,125,000

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

$1,500,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000


525,000
525,000
525,000
446,250
446,250
446,250

446,250

$1,421,250 $1,421,250 $1,421,250

$446,250

The aftertax discount rate is:


Aftertax discount rate = .09(1 .35)
Aftertax discount rate = .0585 or 5.85%
So, the NAL of leasing is:
NAL = $4,125,000 $1,421,500(PVIFA5.85%,3) $446,250 / 1.05854
NAL = $40,065.81
Since the NAL is negative, the company should buy the equipment.
b.

The company is indifferent at the lease payment which makes the NAL of the lease
equal to zero. The NAL equation of the lease is:

0 = $5,100,000 PMT(1 .35) PMT(1 .35)(PVIFA5.85%,3)


$446,250(PVIFA5.85%,4)
PMT = $1,483,252.12
15. a.

The different borrowing rates are irrelevant. A basic tenant of capital budgeting is that
the return of a project depends on the risk of the project. Since the lease payments are
affected by the riskiness of the lessee, the lessees cost of debt is the appropriate
interest rate for the analysis by both companies.

b.

Since the both companies have the same tax rate, there is only one lease payment that
will result in a zero NAL for each company. We will calculate cash flows from the
depreciation tax shield first. The depreciation tax shield is:
Depreciation tax shield = ($330,000/3)(.34) = $37,400
The aftertax cost of debt is the lessees cost of debt, which is:
Aftertax debt cost = .09(1 .34) = .0594
Using all of this information, we can calculate the lease payment as:
NAL = 0 = $330,000 PMT(1 .34)(PVIFA5.94%,3) + $37,400(PVIFA5.94%,3)
PMT = $130,180.63

c.

Since the lessors tax bracket is unchanged, the zero NAL lease payment is the same
as we found in part b. The lessee will not realize the depreciation tax shield, and the
aftertax cost of debt will be the same as the pretax cost of debt. So, the lessees
maximum lease payment will be:
NAL = 0 = $330,000 + PMT(PVIFA9%,3)
PMT = $130,368.07
Both parties have positive NAL for lease payments between $130,180.63 and
$130,368.07.

16. The APR of the loan is the lease factor times 2,400, so:
APR = 0.00342(2,400) = 8.21%
To calculate the lease payment we first need the net capitalization cost, which is the base
capitalized cost plus any other costs, minus any down payment or rebates. So, the net
capitalized cost is:
Net capitalized cost = $28,000 + 450 2,000
Net capitalized cost = $26,450
The depreciation charge is the net capitalized cost minus the residual value, divided by the
term of the lease, which is:
Depreciation charge = ($26,450 16,500) / 36
Depreciation charge = $276.39
Next, we can calculate the finance charge, which is the net capitalized cost plus the
residual value, times the lease factor, or:
Finance charge = ($26,450 + 16,500)(0.00342)
Finance charge = $146.89
And the taxes on each monthly payment will be:
Taxes = ($276.39 + 146.89)(0.07)
Taxes = $29.63
The monthly lease payment is the sum of the depreciation charge, the finance charge, and
taxes, which will be:
Lease payment = $276.39 + 146.89 + 29.63
Lease payment = $452.91

Challenge
17. With a four-year loan, the annual loan payment will be
$4,500,000 = PMT(PVIFA8%,4)
PMT = $1,358,643.62
The aftertax loan payment is found by:
Aftertax payment = Pretax payment Interest tax shield
So, we need to find the interest tax shield. To find this, we need a loan amortization table
since the interest payment each year is the beginning balance times the loan interest rate of
8 percent. The interest tax shield is the interest payment times the tax rate. The
amortization table for this loan is:
Total
payment
$1,358,643.6
2

Interest
payment

Principal
payment

Beginning
balance
$4,500,000.0
0

$360,000.00

3,501,356.38

1,358,643.62

280,108.51

2,422,821.27

1,358,643.62

193,825.70

1,258,003.35

1,358,643.62

100,640.27

$998,643.62
1,078,535.1
1
1,164,817.9
2
1,258,003.3
5

Year

Ending
balance
$3,501,356.3
8
2,422,821.27
1,258,003.35
0.00

So, the total cash flows each year are:


Aftertax loan payment
Total cash flow
Year 1: $1,358,643 ($360,000)(.35)
= $1,232,643.62
$38,606.38
Year 2: $1,358,643 ($280,108.51)(.35) = $1,260,605.64
10,644.36
Year 3: $1,358,643 ($193,825.70)(.35) = $1,290,804.62
Year 4: $1,358,643 ($100,640.27)(.35) = $1,323,419.53

OCF
1,271,250

1,271,250

1,271,250
1,271,250

=
=

19,554.62
52,169.53

So, the NAL with the loan payments is:


NAL = 0 $38,606.38/1.052
$52,169.53/1.0524
NAL = $13,074.25

$10,644.36/1.0522

$19,554.62/1.0523

The NAL is the same because the present value of the aftertax loan payments, discounted
at the aftertax cost of capital (which is the aftertax cost of debt) equals $4,500,000.
18. a.

The decision to buy or lease is made by looking at the incremental cash flows, so we
need to find the cash flows for each alternative. The cash flows if the company leases
are:
Cash flows from leasing:
Aftertax cost savings = $12,000(1 .34)
Aftertax cost savings = $7,920

The tax benefit of the lease is the lease payment times the tax rate, so the tax benefit
of the lease is:
Lease tax benefit = $27,000(.34)
Lease tax benefit = $9,180
We need to remember the lease payments are due at the beginning of the year. So, if
the company leases, the cash flows each year will be:
Year 0
Aftertax savings
Lease payment
Tax benefit
Net cash flows

$27,000
9,180
$17,820

Year 1
$7,920
$27,000
9,180
$9,900

Year 2
$7,920
$27,000
9,180
$9,900

Year 3
$7,920
$27,000
9,180
$9,900

Year 4
$7,920
$27,000
9,180
$9,900

Year 5
$7,920

$7,920

The amount the company borrows and the repayment schedule are irrelevant since the
company maintains a target debt-equity ratio. So, the cash flows from buying the
machine will be:
Cash flows from purchasing:
Aftertax cost savings = $20,000(1 .34)
Aftertax cost savings = $13,200
And the deprecation tax shield will be:
Depreciation tax shield = ($150,000 / 5)(.34)
Depreciation tax shield = $10,200
Year 0
Aftertax savings
Purchase
Dep. tax shield
Net cash flows

Year 1
$13,200

Year 2
$13,200

Year 3
$13,200

Year 4
$13,200

Year 5
$13,200

10,200
$23,400

10,200
$23,400

10,200
$23,400

10,200
$23,400

10,200
$23,400

150,000
$150,000

Now we can calculate the incremental cash flows from leasing versus buying by
subtracting the net cash flows from buying from the net cash flows from leasing. The
incremental cash flows from leasing are:

Lease Buy

Year 0
$132,180

Year 1
$33,300

Year 2
$33,300

The aftertax discount rate is:


Aftertax discount rate = .10(1 .34)
Aftertax discount rate = .0660 or 6.60%
So, the NAL of leasing is:
NAL = $132,180 $33,300(PVIFA6.60%,4) $15,480 / 1.0665
NAL = $7,114.14

Year 3
$33,300

Year 4
$33,300

Year 5
$15,480

Since the NAL is positive, the company should lease the equipment.
b.

As long as the company maintains its target debt-equity ratio, the answer does not
depend upon the form of financing used for the direct purchase. A financial lease will
displace debt regardless of the form of financing.

c.

The amount of displaced debt is the PV of the incremental cash flows from year one
through five.
PV = $33,300(PVIFA6.60%,4) + $15,480 / 1.06605
PV = $125,065.86

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen