Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Brian Singer
SOCI3692
Monisha Sathivel
Structure, Habitus, Practices
Pierre Bourdieu
In Structure, Habitus, Practices, the main argument that Pierre Bourdieu makes is
power is culturally and symbolically created and constantly reinforced through interplay of
agency and structure. This is done through the habitus. The habitus is socialized norms or
tendencies that guide behavior and thinking. It influences the identity, actions and choices of the
individual. The habitus structures inherent qualities of mind and character in an individual and is
produced by the conditionings associated with a particular class of conditions of existence, this
constitutes of systems of durable and transposable dispositions. (Bourdieu)
The habitus, for Bourdieu, are dispositions, the way you behave, act and think that the
individual is habituated to and is attained unconsciously through socialization, their family,
school etc. Bourdieu distinguishes two things, the habitus of class and the individual habitus. The
habitus of class is the idea that a class of individuals, have communal dispositions in their
lifestyle and so they will have shared orientation through their shared habitus. But the habitus of
class isnt something that is individual. Its more of a collective reality.
In distinguishing the individual habitus, Bourdieu goes on to further say that the
individual has his/her own habitus, and within it, has a class habitus. The individual habitus is
then, the singular composition of different collective stratums. The individual can be anyone,
worker or boss, young or old, man or woman, black or white etc. Each individual will therefore
have different characteristics, due to the fact they are coming from a different habitus of class. In
each individual these different characteristics will combine making an individual habitus (as a