Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Food Microbiology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fm
Short communication
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokuang Road, Taichung 402, Taiwan, ROC
Department of Nutrition, China Medical University, No.91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan, ROC
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 1 July 2012
Received in revised form
31 March 2013
Accepted 11 April 2013
Available online 25 April 2013
The microbiological quality of chicken- and pork-based street-food samples from Taichung, Taiwans
night markets (50) and Laguna, Philippines public places (69) was evaluated in comparison to a microbiological guideline for ready-to-eat foods. Different bacterial contamination patterns were observed
between hot-grilled and cold cooked/fried food types from the two sampling locations with hot grilled
foods generally showing better microbiological quality. Several samples were found to be unsatisfactory
due to high levels of aerobic plate count, coliform, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus. The highest
counts obtained were 8.2 log cfu g1, 5.4 log cfu g1, 4.4 log cfu g1, and 3.9 log cfu g1, respectively,
suggesting poor food hygiene practices and poor sanitation. Salmonella was found in 8% and 7% of Taichung and Laguna samples, respectively, which made the samples potentially hazardous. None of the
samples was found to be positive for Listeria monocytogenes and E. coli O157, but Bacillus cereus was
detected at the unsatisfactory level of 4 log cfu g1 in one Laguna sample. Antimicrobial resistance was
observed for Salmonella, E. coli, and S. aureus isolates. Food preparation, cooking, and food handling
practices were considered to be contributors to the unacceptable microbiological quality of the street
foods. Hence, providing training on food hygiene for the street vendors should result in the improvement
of the microbiological quality of street foods. The data obtained in this study can be used as input to
microbial risk assessments and in identifying science-based interventions to control the hazards.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Street food
Ready-to-eat food
Food pathogens
Microbiological quality
Microbial hazard
Antimicrobial resistance
1. Introduction
Street foods are popular because of their accessibility, low cost,
variety, and nutritional value, but sometimes they are perceived as
unsafe because of the unsatisfactory handling practices of food
servers. Most foods are prepared and distributed in mobile and
temporary shops that lack the primary facilities and infrastructure
required to guarantee safe preparation of the foods (WHO, 1996). In
addition, reports have shown that street vendors are generally unaware of basic food-safety issues, lack knowledge about food hygiene, and have little education (WHOeINFOSAN, 2010; WHO,1996).
The proliferation of street-food vendors continues to increase
because the business is very protable and requires very low
capitalization (Cho et al., 2011; WHOeINFOSAN, 2010), and
58
59
Table 1
Microbiological quality of food types according to Guidelines for Microbiological Examination of RTE Foods, FSANZ (2001).
Microbiological guide
% Microbiological quality
Food types,a Taichung, Taiwan
Category
Limit,
hgc
hgp
ccc
ccp
hgc
hgp
cfc
cfu g1
n 18
n 12
n 14
n6
n 24
n 25
n 20
<104
<105
105
50
39
11
42
42
17
0
0
100
0
0
100
50
17
33
76
4
20
75
10
15
102
102e104
104
61
39
0
75
25
0
0
36
64
0
50
50
21
67
13
40
48
12
50
50
0
<3
3e100
100
100
0
0
100
0
0
29
43
29
100
0
0
83
4
13
92
0
8
100
0
0
102
102e103
103e104
100
0
0
100
0
0
43
36
21
83
0
17
79
4
17
88
0
12
95
5
0
102
102e103
103e104
100
0
0
100
0
0
79
21
0
83
17
0
96
0
4
96
0
4
100
0
0
Food type: hgc hot-grilled chicken; hgp hot-grilled pork; ccc cold-cooked chicken; ccp cold-cooked pork; cfc cold fried-chicken.
Category: S Satisfactory, results indicate good microbiological quality; M Marginal, results are borderline in that they are within limits of acceptable microbiological
quality but may indicate possible hygiene problems in the preparation of the food; US Unsatisfactory, results are outside of acceptable microbiological limits and are
indicative of poor hygiene or food handling practices.
b
60
Table 2
Bacterial counts of chicken- and pork-based street foods from Taichung, Taiwan and Laguna, Philippines.
Food typea
Sample size, n
Taichung
hgc
18
hgp
12
ccc
14
ccp
Laguna
hgc
24
hgp
25
cfc
20
a
b
c
d
Coliform
E. coli
S. aureus
B. cereus
4.0 (0.7)c
(2.1e5.1)d
3.8 (1.1)
(1.3e5.1)
5.7 (0.6)
(5.1e6.5)
5.6 (0.5)
(5.1e6.4)
1.9 (0.9)
(<1.0e3.52)
1.5 (0.9)
(<1.0e3.4)
4.3 (0.7)
(3.1e5.4)
3.9 (0.5)
(3.1e4.4)
<1.0 (0.0)
<1.0 (0.0)
<10.0 (0.0)
<1.0 (0.0)
<1.0 (0.0)
<10.0 (0.0)
2.2 (1.3)
(<1.0e4.7)
<1.0 (0.0)
1.8 (0.9)
(<1.0e3.4)
1.3 (0.9)
(<1e3.1.0)
2.0 (0.2)
(<2.0e2.5)
2.2 (0.5)
(<2.0e3.2)
3.5 (1.5)
(1.0e5.6)
3.5 (1.6)
(1.4e8.2)
2.8 (1.3)
(1.0e5.4)
2.0 (1.2)
(<1.0e4.4)
1.9 (1.4)
(<1.0e5.4)
1.4 (0.8)
(<1.0e3.4)
1.4 (0.9)
(<1.0e4.4)
1.3 (0.8)
(<1.0e4.4)
1.2 (0.4)
(<1.0e2.0)
1.2 (0.6)
(<1.0e3.0)
1.3 (1.0)
(<1.0e3.9)
1.4 (0.7)
(<1.0e2.4)
2.0 (0.4)
(<2.0e3.9)
2.0 (0.4)
(<2.0e4.0)
<2.0(0.0)
Food type: hgc hot grilled chicken; hgp hot grilled pork; ccc cold cooked chicken; ccp cold cooked pork; cfc cold fried chicken.
Aerobic plate count.
Numbers in parentheses indicate standard deviation.
Numbers in parentheses indicate range of bacterial counts.
samples, i.e., 3%, 9%, and 3%, respectively (Cho et al., 2011). In
another study, E. coli was detected in 5 of 43 (11.6%) of grilledchicken samples from street vendors in Mexico, while S. aureus
was detected in 4 of 43 (9.3%) of such samples (Diaz-Lopez et al.,
2011). In contrast, these pathogens were not detected in any of
the Taichung hot-grilled samples (Table 1), which had a 100%
satisfactory rating.
Salmonella was detected in one of the 25 (4%) Laguna hgc
samples (intestines) and in three of the 25 (12%) Laguna hgp
samples (liver, meat, head, and sausage). The pathogen was also
detected in three (17%) Taichung hgc samples (heart, intestine,
blood) and one (8%) hgp samples (sausage) (data not shown). The
detection of Salmonella spp. in a 25-g sample is considered
potentially hazardous or unacceptable according to the microbiological guide that was used. The Salmonella isolated from the positives samples were serotyped as Salmonella Typhimurium. The
prevalence of Salmonella in RTE and street foods has been reported
in various studies. Diaz-Lopez et al. (2011) reported a higher
prevalence of Salmonella in grilled chicken from street vendors than
in retail outlets. Yan et al. (2010) reported that 81 Salmonella isolates were recovered in 20.9% of retail foods, including chicken and
pork meats. The presence of this pathogen has been associated with
inadequate cooking, cross-contamination from an unhygienic
environment, and food handlers.
L. monocytogenes and E. coli O157 were not detected in any of the
hgc and hgp samples from any sampling sites, signifying the adequacy of the grilling process. These ndings agree with those reported by Diaz-Lopez et al. (2011), wherein L. monocytogenes and
E. coli (shiga toxin and enterotoxin producer) were not detected in
any of the 43 samples of grilled chicken.
Appropriate food preparation, including sufcient cooking, is a
critical contributor to the safety of food. In this survey, the streetfood samples had undergone cooking, such as grilling for hgc and
hgc, boiling for ccc and ccp, and frying for cfc, as heat treatments
and kill steps to destroy the microorganisms in the food. Prior to
consumption, perishable, uncured meats should be cooked fully to
an internal temperature of at least 70 C to eliminate vegetative
infectious pathogenic bacteria (ICMSF, 2005). Although hgc and
hgp were cooked or heated before selling, some samples were still
found unsatisfactory and unacceptable because they had bacterial
counts above the microbiological limits established by FSANZ. Like
any other street foods, poor food preparation and handling and
61
Table 3
Pathogenic microorganisms detected in chicken- and pork-based street foods collected from studied areas in Taichung, Taiwan and Laguna, Philippines.
% Pathogenic microorganism detected
Taichung
Escherichia coli
Staphylococcus aureus
Bacillus cereus
Salmonella spp
Listeria monocytogenes
Escherichia coli O157
a
b
c
d
e
Laguna
hgca
hgpb
cccc
ccpd
n 18
n 12
n 14
n6
n 24
n 25
n 20
nd
nd
nd
17
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
8
nd
nd
72
57
21
nd
nd
nd
nd
17
17
nd
nd
nd
17
21
4
4
nd
nd
8
12
4
12
nd
nd
25
5
nd
5
nd
nd
hgc
hgp
cfce
62