Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com/
Science Quarterly
Published by:
http://www.sagepublications.com
Additional services and information for Nursing Science Quarterly can be found at:
Email Alerts: http://nsq.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts
Subscriptions: http://nsq.sagepub.com/subscriptions
Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav
Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
Citations: http://nsq.sagepub.com/content/24/4/312.refs.html
419218
zak / Research IssuesNursing Science Quarterly
NSQXXX10.1177/0894318411419218Florc
Research Issues
Abstract
Two key events lead to the prominence of links among Roys grand theory, derived middle-range theories and the design
of research. The author in this column describes this work in two formats. Essential details of two areas of research are
presented in episodic formthe first is work on secondary analysis of Roy model-based research over 40 years and the
authors study of persons cognitive recovery from mild head injury.The second is a project on re-conceptualizing coping and
adaptation processing in sequential detail within the context of work in the field and the significance of on-going work for
nursing practice.
Keywords
adaptation, coping, middle-range theory, research, Roy adaptation model
Contributing Editor:
Kristine L. Florczak, RN, PhD, Associate Professor, Saint Xavier University,
7807 Janes Avenue, Woodridge, Illinois, 60517
Email: Florczak@sxu.edu
313
Roy
Middle-Range
Theory of Cognitive
Processing
Integrated Review
of RAA Research
and Testing of
Propositions
(BBARNS, 1999; Roy
et al.,2005)
Cognitive
Recovery from
Mild Head Injury
(Roy, 2011)
Coping and
Adaptation
Processing
Instrument
Development
Effectiveness of an
educational program focus
on cognitive processing to
modify the capacity of
coping and adaptation
processing(Gonzalez, 2007)
Note. RAA = Roy Adaptation Association, BBARNS = Boston-Based Adaptation Research in Nursing Society
314
315
Roy
situations or the strategies measured. Aldwin reported that in
1987 she identified over 20 coping scales; in 1994 the list
was updated to 70; and in 2007 there were 200 references to
coping scales. She identified increases in scales in languages
other than English, those for children and adolescents, and
those with highly specialized strategies. In a list of coping
scales for clinical health situations, Aldwin included, for
example, coping with asthma in everyday life.
Nursing research on coping has drawn extensively from
the literature in psychology, notably Johnson's (1972) seminal work used in the conceptualization developed by Lazarus
and associates (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). Johnson and her
colleagues studied individuals' levels of distress when they
were given sensory information before threatening events in
both clinical and laboratory situations. Later intervention
studies (Johnson, Rice, Fuller, & Endress, 1978) made use of
Lazarus' distinction between problem-solving coping and
emotion-focused stress related coping. Even this early work
began to call this dichotomy into question. Johnson and colleagues found that teaching problem-solving coping was not
more effective for recovery from surgery. They suggested
that the most useful nursing intervention might be to support
and teach effective use of the patient's own coping strategies,
and that these strategies might incorporate elements of both
the problem-solving and emotion-focused approaches.
Later Jalowiec (1993) reviewed a decade of stress and coping research in nursing and reported that 70 percent of nursing
studies used Lazarus model. She specifically questioned
whether or not nurse researchers were losing discrimination in
measurement and in differentiation of outcomes by relying on
the distinction between problem or emotion coping and not
tapping into the rich cognitive and behavioral domains of coping. The persistent wide use of Lazarus conceptualization and
instrument is reflected in a review of the Cumulative Index to
Nursing and Allied Health Literature (1998 to 2004) databases
that showed 151 studies reported use of the questionnaire during those years. When the same search was repeated by this
author the number of studies reported using Lazarus from
2005 to 2010 was 25. In some of these studies the instrument
did not perform as predicted, for example, only one coping
subscale was found to partially mediate the relationship
between levels of stress and well-being in mothers of preschool children with asthma (Sangsuwan, 2006). The lack of
evidence of cumulative knowledge in the nursing literature is
notable. The Ways of Coping Questionnaire by Lazarus and
associates has been referred to as the standard in the field.
However, a number of authors, as reported by Aldwin (2007)
noted the construct validity of the instrument was not strong,
given an unstable factor structure.
Later Folkman and Moskowitz (2004) reviewed 35 years
of coping research across social and behavioral science,
medicine, public health, and nursing and concluded that we
seem only to have scratched the surface of understanding the
ways in which coping actually affects psychological, physiological, and behavioral outcomes both in the short-and the
316
COGNATOR
Manifested in
Subsystem of the
Roy Adaptation
Model
ADAPTIVE
MODES
Physiologic
Self Concept
Uses
INFORMATION
PROCESSING
Inferred
ObservedCoping
CognitiveStrategies
Behaviors
Role Function
Input
Central
Output
Interdependence
Synthesized
Coping and
Adaptation Processing
Definition of Terms
Key terms based on the theoretical and empirical work by Roy
(1976, 1988, 2001) were defined as follows. Adaptation is the
process and outcome whereby thinking and feeling persons
use conscious awareness and choice to create human and
environmental integration. Coping strategies are behaviors
whereby adaptation processing is carried out in daily situations and in critical periods; the categories are synthesized
from behaviors in four adaptive modes, physiologic, self
concept, role, and interdependence. Adaptation processing is
patterning of coping behaviors that take in, handle, and
respond to stressors and are directed toward survival, growth,
reproduction, mastery, and transcendence. Coping and adaptation processing is the patterning of innate and acquired ways
of taking in, handling, and responding to a changing environment in daily situations and in critical periods that direct
behavior toward survival, growth, reproduction, mastery, and
transcendence. Capacity of coping and adaptation processing
is the ability of persons based to respond to changes in the
environment that use their coping styles and strategies to
adapt effectively to challenges (Gonzalez, 2007).
The revised conceptual and behavioral understanding of
coping and adaptation processing is both person and environment based; includes process, multidimensionality, and
transaction. Further, it can be relevant for designing and testing interventions related to the study of people and their
health.
317
Roy
Table 1. Description of Samples Used in Scale Development and Testing
Step
1
2
3
4
Description (n)
Men
Women
54 (33-78)
16
20
58 (23-83)
161
35
82
69
42 (18-80)
56 (27-77)
318
from the CAPS, as with the first subscale, correlated negatively with the WCQ escape-avoidance scale and positively
with the positive reappraisal and planful problem solving
scales. Likewise, the CAPS subscale of knowing and relating correlated negatively with the WCQ escape-avoidance
scale and positively with the positive reappraisal and planful
problem solving scales.
Two approaches to reliability lent credence to the ability
of the CAPS to consistently measure the construct of interest. The Cronbachs alpha coefficient for the total CAPS was
calculated at .94. This indicated the desired internal consistency of the items, yet reflected that fine discriminations in
levels of the construct could be made (Burns & Grove, 2009).
Further the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability scores for
the five subscales were: .84 for factor 1, .84 for factor 2, .80
for factor 3; .72 for factor 4, and .78 for subscale 5. Spit-half
reliability is considered less rigorous than test-retest reliability, but was deemed an appropriate indicator at this stage of
development of the instrument.
319
Roy
The development of this instrument was derived from a
multidimensional and transactional conceptualization to
answer the difficulties identified in the measurement of coping. The conceptualization based on understanding the process of adaptation provided an integrated view of the persons
coping and used inductive and deductive approaches rooted
in nursing practice. The psychometric analysis is promising
as is its clinical usefulness. Recommendations for further
testing include: a) Confirm the stability of both the construct
and the instrument through confirmatory factor analysis; b)
test usefulness in intervention nursing research; and c)
explore cross-cultural use of the CAPS in other populations.
Summary
The link of middle-range theory development derived from a
nursing grand theory to design research has been particularly
prominent in the last 25 years of research based on the RAM.
The key events of the founding of the RAA and Roys postdoctoral studies and research in neuroscience nursing, sparked
several decades of significant work by Roy, colleagues, and
scholars in general. As a final example presented here, even as
clarification and publication of the CAPS progresses, Figure
1 illustrates some examples of research stemming from this
work. Because the scale development has been reported at
meetings of the RAA, it has been translated into other languages (under the supervision of the principal investigator)
and used by investigators globally. The tool was translated
into Thai (Chayput & Roy, 2007) by one of Roys students
and the tool has been in use for research in that country. The
first use by members of the RAA, Japan Chapter (Toriya &
Tsuhako, 2008), is identified along with an on-going work of
scholars of RAA, Colombia Chapter (Guiterrez, 2009). The
intervention study by Gonzalez (2007), RAA, Panama
Chapter, was an important contribution to theory, methods,
and practice. Roy continues to explore issues such as state and
trait with colleagues as well.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect
to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
Aldwin, C. M. (1994). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. New York: The Guilford Press.
Aldwin, C. M. (2007). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Boston Based Adaptation Research in Nursing Society. (1999). Roy
adaptation model-based research: 25 years of contributions to
nursing science. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2009). The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and utilization (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Saunders.
Carroll, J. (2011, February 14). Times face, times digits. Boston
Globe, p. 34.
Chayaput, P., & Roy, C. (2007). Psychometric testing of the Thai
version of coping and adaption processing scaleshort form
(TCAPS-SF). Thai Journal of Nursing Council, 22(3), 29-39.
Gonzalez, Y. M. (2007, June). Efficacy of two interventions based
on the theory of coping and adaptation processing. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Roy Adaptation Association Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
Guiterrez, C. L. (2009, June). Callista Roys Coping Adaptation
Processing Scale (CAPS)A methodological proposal for its
interpretation. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Roy Adaptation Association Conference, Boston, MA.
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual for the ways of coping questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist
Press.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. (2004). Coping: Pitfalls and promise.
American Review of Psychology, 55, 745-774.
Frydenberg, E. (2002). Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions, and
challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jalowiec, A. (1993). Coping with illness: Synthesis and critique of
the nursing coping literature from 1980-1990. In J. S. Barnfather & B. L. Lyon (Eds.), Stress and coping: State of the science
and implications for nursing theory, research and practice (pp.
65-83). Indianapolis, IN: Center Nursing Press.
Johnson, J. (1972). Effects of structuring patients expectations on
their reactions to threatening events. Nursing Research, 21,
499-508.
Johnson, J., Rice, V., Fuller, S., & Endress, M. (1978). Sensory
information, instruction in a coping strategy and recovery from
surgery. Research in Nursing and Health, 1, 4-17.
Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Lazarus, R. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New
York: Springer.
Lazarus, R. L., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping.
New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Likert, R. A. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes.
Archives of Psychology, 140, 1-55.
Norusis, M. J. (2002). SPSS 11.5 guide to data analysis. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Nursing research: Principles and
methods (6th ed.). Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
Pollock, S., Roy, C., Frederickson, K., Massey, V., Carson, M., &
Germaine, C. (1991). Testing concepts from the Roy adaptation model. Symposium presentation at the Council of Nurse
Researchers, American Nurses Association, Los Angeles, CA.
Roy, C. (1975). Psycho-social adaptation and the coping mechanisms.Unpublished manuscript, Clinical site, West Covenia,
CA: Queen of the Valley Hospital.
Roy, C. (1976). Introduction to nursing: An adaptation model.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
320