Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
560
1/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
FIRST DIVISION.
561
561
2/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
562
3/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
563
4/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
EXISTED,
THUS
IGNORING
THE
REQUIREMENTS LAID DOWN BY LAW THAT
WOULD
WARRANT
THE
PRESUMPTION/CONCLUSION
THAT
A
PARTNERSHIP EXISTS.
C. IN FINDING THAT THE INSTANT CASE IS
SIMILAR TO THE EVANGELISTA CASE AND
THEREFORE
SHOULD
BE
DECIDED
ALONGSIDE THE EVANGELISTA CASE. D. IN
RULING THAT THE TAX AMNESTY DID NOT
RELIEVE THE PETITIONERS FROM PAYMENT
OF OTHER TAXES FOR THE PERIOD COVERED
BY SUCH AMNESTY. (pp. 1213, Rollo.)
The petition is meritorious.
The basis of the subject decision of the4 respondent court
is the ruling of this Court in Evangelista.
In the said case, petitioners borrowed a sum of money
from their father which together with their own personal
funds they
_______________
3
Supra.
Supra.
564
564
5/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
565
6/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
566
7/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
567
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015798d063da6b1f791f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
8/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
568
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015798d063da6b1f791f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
9/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
pro rata with all their property and after all the partnership
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015798d063da6b1f791f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
10/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
569
569
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015798d063da6b1f791f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
11/12
10/6/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME166
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015798d063da6b1f791f003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
12/12