REGIONAL TRIAL COURT BRANCH PARANAQUE CITY EUFEMIA R. REMIGIO Petitioner , VS. Civil Case No.: For: Petition for Declaration of Nullity of Marriage Under Article Art. 35. Paragraph (4) VIRGILIO T. REMIGIO and MARIA FLORES LUMACTOD Responde nt. x----------------------------------x PETITION COMES NOW the Petitioner through undersigned counsel, unto the most Honorable Court, most respectfully states that: 1. Petitioner is EUFEMIA R. REMIGIO, 60 years old, Filipino, married and a resident of 8796 Nacarst. Phase 5, Marcelo Green Village, Paranaque City; 2. Respondents are VIRGILIO T. REMIGIO, and MARIA FLORES LUMACTOD Maria Flores Lumactod both Filipino, of legal age, and residents of Purok 6 South Poblacion, Medina City, Cagayan De Oro Province, Misamis Oriental; 3. Petitioner and Respondent-Vergilio were married on 23 April 1977 in the city of Manila, attached hereto as Annex A is a copy of the Marriage Certificate, the same is made an integral part of this Petition; 4. Respondent was an OFW for around 32 years, and worked as a Service Technician at the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Petitoner would only see the respondent for a month
every year whenever he was on vacation. He would always
go home to where to Petitioner currently resides; 5. Throughout the 38 years of marriage, the Respondent was unfaithful to the respondent, and had other relationships with other women; 6. Respondent, Virgilio T. Remegio was recently diagnosed with a terminal illness, and is currently at the brink of death; 7. Due to the aforementioned situation, Petitioner discovered that the Respondent-Virgilio entered into another marriage despite the existence of the marriage with the former, with a certain Maria Flores Lumactod on 22 October 2004 at Cagayan De Oro, Misamis Oriental. They are living together at Purok 6 South Poblacion, Medina City, Cagayan De Oro Province, Misamis Oriental. Attached hereto as Annex B, is a copy of the certificate of 2 marriages of the Respondent; 8.
The respondents have acquired properties together;
10. The marriage between the Respondents is thus void ab
initio as provided by Article 35 paragraph (4), which states: Art. 35. The following marriages shall be void from the beginning: -xxx(4) Those bigamous or polygamous marriages not failing under Article 41 11. In sum, Petitioner entered into marriage with Respondent-Virgilio on 23 April 1977 in the City of Manila, Respondents were married on 22 October 2004 in Cagayan De Oro. The second marriage was entered into despite the existence of the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent-Virgillio; PRAYER WHEREFORE, above premises considered, it is most respectfully prayed that:
a.
The marriage between the Respondents be
declared null and void ab initio on the ground that it is bigamous; b. After due consideration, a decree of nullity of marriage be issued by this Honorable Court, ordering that: 1. The proper Civil Registrar record the dissolution of the marriage of the Respondents; 2. The Certificate of Marriage of the parties be cancelled and impugned from the records of the appropriate Civil Registrar and of the National Statistics Office; 3. Properties acquired by the Respondents be declared as the conjugal property of the Petitioner and Respondent-Virgilio; Other reliefs and remedies that are just and equitable under the forgoing circumstances are likewise prayed for. Respectfully Submitted, September 22, 2015, City of Makati for the City of Paranaque
LUSTRE SANTOS LAW OFFICE
9th Floor LPL Suites, 112 Legaspi St. ,Legaspi Village Makati City