0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
96 Ansichten1 Seite
The document provides a rubric to evaluate presentations across four criteria: content delivery, organization, creativity, and length. It defines four levels of achievement for each criterion from superior to inadequate. A superior presentation implements varied themes and evidence, delivers content in an organized and engaging manner, is highly original, and meets the allotted time limit. An inadequate presentation focuses on irrelevant content, lacks clarity and engagement, has poor organization, and exceeds the time limit.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate presentations across four criteria: content delivery, organization, creativity, and length. It defines four levels of achievement for each criterion from superior to inadequate. A superior presentation implements varied themes and evidence, delivers content in an organized and engaging manner, is highly original, and meets the allotted time limit. An inadequate presentation focuses on irrelevant content, lacks clarity and engagement, has poor organization, and exceeds the time limit.
The document provides a rubric to evaluate presentations across four criteria: content delivery, organization, creativity, and length. It defines four levels of achievement for each criterion from superior to inadequate. A superior presentation implements varied themes and evidence, delivers content in an organized and engaging manner, is highly original, and meets the allotted time limit. An inadequate presentation focuses on irrelevant content, lacks clarity and engagement, has poor organization, and exceeds the time limit.
Delivery Organization Creativity Length of Presentation
Superior
Adequate
Minimal
Inadequate
The group implements a variety of
themes and content suitable for the task, such as details, examples and various forms of evidence. The subject matter is interpreted in a manner that easily comprehended.
The group remains focused on relevant
content. The group adapts the subject matter in a manner that is both feasible and appropriate.
The group includes some irrelevant
content, at times failing to stay on focus. The group utilizes words and concepts which are inappropriate for the classroom such as profanity.
The group says practically nothing.
The group focuses primarily on irrelevant content.
The group delivers their
presentation in a manner that is organized, confident and enthusiastic. The volume and rate varies to add emphasis and interest. Pronunciation and enunciation are very clear. Group successfully engages the audience.
The presentation is of moderate volume
and pace, not to low or loud and not to fast or slow. The group member present in manner that is comprehensible with few uhs and ums in between.
The speakers are difficult to
understand. The pace of the presentation is a bit fast or a bit slow. The group expresses too many 'uhs,' ums'. The audience is somewhat engaged or follows along..
The group fails to properly vocalize
their performance. The pace is either too fast or drags on. The presentation itself is unclear and fails to engage its audience.
The presentation is superbly
organized. The groups transition between ideas and characters is seamless.
The message is organized. There is no
difficulty understanding the subject matter. Concepts within the presentation may be outlined in a simple manner.
The organization of the presentation
makes it difficult for the audience to understand the events and themes.
The organization of the presentation
left the audience unable to understand the sequence of events as well as the concepts expressed.
An excellent presentation rooted in
originality and impressive adaptation of themes and ideas.
A mostly original presentation that does
well to express concepts in an interesting form.
Presentation is not entirely original,
requires a more engaging way of presenting concepts.