Samantha J. Hasenzahl Bon Secours Memorial College of Nursing
STANDARDIZED NURSING TERMINOLOGY
2 Standardized Nursing Terminology Assignment In 2004, the Department of Health and Human Services released The Decade of Health Information Technology: Delivering Consumer-centric and Information-rich Health Care that mandated a National Health Information Network. The purpose of this network was to use information technology to connect electronic medical records from various healthcare settings, disciplines, locations, and information systems. The ability for different healthcare providers to share data would help reduce medial errors, improve care, and save money (Westra, Delaney, Konicek, & Keenan, 2008). In order for this type of system to work there needed to be some standardizations, or agreed-upon ways to record and exchange data within and across information systems (Westra et al, 2008, p. 258). Standardized terminologies organize and sort various concepts and aspects of healthcare (i.e. nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes) that allows for easier communication and understanding between various healthcare professionals. Although this legislation is fairly new, the importance of standardized terminology has been around for a long time. The International Classification of Diseases was developed in the 1850s to help classify causes of death. The North American Nursing Diagnoses Association (NANDA) created the first standardized nursing diagnoses in 1975 with the Omaha project. Later on NANDA developed the Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC) and the Nursing Outcomes Classifications (NOC) (Westra et al, 2008). NIC and NOC allow for nurses to document their care in a format that allows future nurses to better understand their patients prior medical history and care. The Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) was developed to provide standardized terminology to the health profession community. SNOMED CT is a thorough list of clinical terms that are organized and categorized in such a way that it
STANDARDIZED NURSING TERMINOLOGY
3 improves the documentation, retrieval, and distribution of health information (Rafiei, Pieczkiewicz, Khairat, Westra, & Adams, 2014). In other words, it connects concepts that make the documentation and retrieval of health information easier which improves quality of care. Advantages The ultimate goal for health IT and standardized terminology is to improve the quality of care. Cost reduction, decreased pharmacological and medical errors, increased efficacy, and improved communication are just a few of the advantages of standardized terminology. Communication can be improved because documentation will be standardized, in other words there is a universal language (Sweeney, 2010, p. 535) that provides consistency to documentation and evaluation of patient care. In addition, standardized terminology makes the conduction of research easier. When concepts and terms are standardized a researcher only has to look up a common phrase or word to find a lot of subjects. Prior to standardized terms/concepts such as interventions, diagnoses, and signs and symptoms may not have been as easily found. Linking those concepts (intervention to symptoms to evaluation) has also been made easier through standardization. The common index of terms has made it easier to obtain larger sample sizes, which in turn allows for more valid data. As a result, more evidence based practice has been produced and this leads to improved quality of care. Disadvantages Having a standardized system has many advantages; however, as with every system there are some disadvantages as well. With the increase in accessibility to technology and information research has boomed; although this is a positive, with all the new information being discovered each and every day it is hard to keep up. Not everything can be included in the standardized
STANDARDIZED NURSING TERMINOLOGY
4 terminology list. Just as Websters Dictionary cannot keep up with todays slang, developing code for new terminology takes time. DeBlieck, LaFlamme, Rivard, and Monsen (2013) reviewed several electronic health records (EHRs) and found a dearth of standardized documentation and clinical decision support related to postoperative nausea and vomiting/postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PONV/PDNV) guidelines and lack of measureable interventions and outcomes specific to PONV/PDNV (p. 375). PONV/PDNV are common side effects of anesthesia, yet there is limited standardization around the recognition of and interventions for this problem. There is not a centralized system that is used throughout the country, let alone the world. This disconnect between various systems can make it difficult for health professionals to access patient information and history (Sweeney, 2010). Just like with paper charts, faxes are still required in order to transfer records. This could potentially result in a HIPPA violation. Just like developing a standardized terminology, developing a centralized, standardized EHR is imperative in ensuring quality patient care. Another limitation to standardized terminologies and EHR is that a lot of systems are based on the medical model. They are not necessarily based on nursing terminology or the nursing process. Given that the terminology is based on the medical model, some nurses may not find the systems to be relevant to the care their practice and the care they are providing (Sweeney, 2010). Why Standardized Nursing is Important Having standardized terminology is logical, but a single agreed upon model of terminology is imperative for practical use. The Systematized Nomenclature of MedicineClinical Terminology (SNOMED-CT) is becoming this agreed up model. SNOMED-CT allows
STANDARDIZED NURSING TERMINOLOGY
5 for clinicians to use terms that fit their practice and share data across systems without reentry of data (Westra et al, 2008, p. 261). In other words, SNOMED-CT allows doctors and nurses from New York to understand the care that a patient received in Los Angeles. In addition, standardized terminology makes research projects easier which in turn improves clinical care as nurses are able to use evidenced-based practices.
STANDARDIZED NURSING TERMINOLOGY
6 References DeBLIECK, C., LaFLAMME, A. F., Rivard, M. J., & Monsen, K. A. (2013). Standardizing Documentation for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in the Electronic Health Record. AORN Journal, 98(4), 370-380. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2012.12.021 Rafiei, M., Pieczkiewicz, D., Khairat, S., Westra, B.L., & Adams, T. (2014). Systemized nomenclature for the structured expression of perioperative medication management recommendations. American Journal of Health-Systems Pharmacy, 71(23), 2020-2027. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130593 Sweeney, P. (2010). The effects of information technology on perioperative nursing. AORN Journal, 92(5), 528-540. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2010.02.016 Westra, B.L., Delaney, C.W., Konicek, D., & Keenan, G. (2008). Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nursing Outlook, 56(5), 258-266. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.005