Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
59
ISSN: 2319-1112
jain.pranali.91@gmail.com
kulsat@gmail.com, Amod_shrotri@rediffmail.com,4ashutoshdandekar@gmail.com
,2
Abstract ;-The main trend of the machining industry is towards the production cost reduction by using higher cutting speeds
and by reducing human resources. The necessity of the latter is resulting into the development of unmanned machining
systems. Condition monitoring system, which is capable of identifying machining system defects and their location, are essential
for unmanned machining.
In this paper general tool maintenance techniques are discussed along with brief discussion on the tool condition
monitoring techniques. Different types of tool wear and their mechanisms are also studied. Different parameters affecting tool
condition are discussed.
Keywords: condition Monitoring, tool wear, Vibration signature analysis
I.INTRODUCTION:Condition monitoring, capable of identifying machining system defects and their location, is essential for
unmanned machining. The ability to monitor the condition of machines while in operation is very useful in preventive
maintenance of continuously operating machine. Continuous monitoring will find application with the most critical
machines, to guard against rapidly deteriorating situations and allow shutdown before catastrophic failure occurs.
There are various methods used for tool condition monitoring, mainly distinguished as direct and indirect methods.
Vibration signature analysis is one of the important methods which fall under indirect method.
Vibration signature represents a measurable symptom of a problem associated with rotating equipment which
results in destructive mechanism such as fatigue, stress or wear of concern equipments. Machines in good condition
generally tend to have a fairly stable vibration pattern. Changes in the internal conditions are often reflected by changes in
the vibration pattern which can then be detected by externally mounted pick-ups while the machine is in operation.
II.Literature review:
Tool wear condition is defined as the change of tool cutting geometry. Tool wear monitoring implies strategy
which, based on the sensor signals placed on the machining system, allow quick reaction to all out coming process
disruptions.
One of the most important components in a machining system is the tool. Unmanned production is possible
only if there is a method or a combination of methods available for tool condition monitoring (TCM). Tool wear
influences the quality of the surface finish and the dimensions of the parts that are manufactured, whereas tool failure is a
major cause of unplanned interruption in a machining environment. Tamizharasan and Senthil Kumar[1] evaluated the
effect of tool geometries on performance measures of flank wear, surface roughness and cutting forces. They applied
finite element analysis to minimize flank wear of uncoated carbide inserts during machining. Taguchis DOE is used to
2.
3.
.
Fig. 2: Condition based maintenance.
Tool condition monitoring (TCM) methods can be categorized into several. In-process (In-line) TCM
studies detect the amount of tool wear during the cutting process. Off-process (Off-line) TCM studies detect
the amount of tool wear at the end of the cutting process. TCM systems also may be grouped into direct
systems and indirect systems, based on the type of sensor technology used.
Erkki Jantunen[4] has summarized the different direct and indirect methods applied to tool condition
monitoring. P.N. Botsaris and J.A. Tsanakas [5] have reviewed the state of art in methods applied to tool condition
monitoring.Tadic B. et. al. [6] have explained how approach based on indirect methods of condition monitoring has
advantages over direct methods.
II.b . STUDIES OF TOOL CONDITION MONITORING
Table 1: Differentiating Points of Direct and Indirect Methods
Direct Method
Indirect Method
Castejon et. al.[7] have made use of geometric descriptors from digital images for on-line tool wear
monitoring. He has studied a new method based on a computer vision and statistical learning system which is proposed to
estimate the wear level in cutting inserts in order to identify the time for its replacement. Abellan-Nebot[8] has reviewed
machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence. He has reviewed application of various sensor systems and
techniques for signal processing in building laboratory systems for tool wear monitoring. He analyzed various design
solutions in terms of the number and types of sensors. H. Chelladurai et. al.[9] has developed the cutting tool condition
monitoring system for high speed turning operation by vibration and strain analysis. The problem of detection of flank
wear in turning operation has been studied using vibration and strain measurement methods. An attempt has been made to
create artificial flank wear using the electrical discharge machining (EDM) process to emulate the actual or real flank
wear. T. I. El- Wardany et. al.[10] has used the vibration signature analysis to monitor the tool condition in drilling.
Discriminate features, which are sensitive to drill wear and breakage, wear developed in both time and frequency domain.
Tool rake angles () : Positive tool rake angle sharpens the tool, so decreases strength. Negative rake angle
decreases sharpness of tool so, increases strength.
Clearance angle Fig. 3.1.5 schematically shows how clearance angle, affects tool life.
Physical and chemical properties of work material influence tool life by affecting form stability and rate of wear of tool.
Tamizharasan, T.,Senthil Kumar, N.,Optimization of cutting insert geometry using deform-3D numerical simulation and experimental
validation,International Journal of Simulation Modelling(2012), pp: 65-76.S. s. rao
Soo-Yen Lee,In-process tool condition monitoring systems in CNC turning
operations Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1272,
2006.
ErkkiJantunen, A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling International journal of machine tools &
Manufacture (2002) 997-1010.
P.N. Botsaris and J.A. Tsanakas, State-of-the-art in methods applied to tool condition monitoring in unmanned machining operations: a
review The International Conference of COMADEM, Prague, 2008, pp: 73-87.
Tadic, B.; Vukelic, D.; Hodolic, J.; Mitrovic, S.; Eric, M. Conservative-Force-Controlled Feed Drive System for Down Milling,
StrojniskivestnikJournal of Mechanical Engineering, (2011), pp. 425-439.
M. Castejon, E. Alegre, J. Barreiro, L.K. Hernandez, On-line tool wear monitoring using geometric descriptors from digital images
International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture (2007), pp: 18471853.
Abellan-Nebot, J. V.; Subirn, F. R. A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models,
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, (2010),pp: 237257.
H. Chelladurai& V. K. Jain & N. S. Vyas Development of a cutting tool condition monitoring system for high speed turning operation by
vibration and strain analysis 2008, pp:471485.
K. Jemielniak, Commercial Tool Condition Monitoring Systems, Int J AdvancedManufacturing Technology, Springer-Verlag London
Limited, (1999), pp: 711721.
T. I. El- Wardany, D. Gao, and M. A. Elbestawi, Tool condition monitoring in drilling using vibration signature analysis Int. J. Mach.
Tools Manufacturing, Vol. 36, No. 6,1996, pp: 687-711.
S.K. Acharya, Amalendu Das, V.K. Gupta, K.R. Anilkumar, Ravindranath and S. Bhattacharjee, Vibration Signature Analysis as a
Diagnostic Tool for Condition Assessment of Rotating Equipments Experience at TAPS NDE 2009, December 10-12,2009.
M. S. H. Bhuiyan, I. A. Choudhury, and Y. Nukman, Tool Condition Monitoring using Acoustic Emission and Vibration Signature in
Turning Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2012 Vol.3, WCE 2012, pp: 978-988.
M. S. H. Bhuiyan, I. A. Choudhury, and Y. Nukman, Tool Condition Monitoring using Acoustic Emission and Vibration Signature in
Turning Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2012 Vol.3, WCE 2012, pp: 978-988.