Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
DECISION
PARAS, J.:
(e) Section 32 which spells out the productionsharing plan mentioned in Section 13
". . . (W)hereby three percent (3%) of the gross sales
from the production of such lands are distributed
within sixty (60) days of the end of the fiscal year as
compensation to regular and other farmworkers in
such lands over and above the compensation they
currently receive: Provided, That these individuals or
entities realize gross sales in excess of five million
pesos per annum unless the DAR, upon proper
application, determine a lower ceiling.
In the event that the individual or entity realizes a
profit, an additional ten (10%) of the net profit after
tax shall be distributed to said regular and other
farmworkers within ninety (90) days of the end of the
fiscal year . . ."
The main issue in this petition is the constitutionality of
Sections 3(b), 11, 13 and 32 of R.A. No. 6657 (the
Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988), insofar as the
said law includes the raising of livestock, poultry and swine in
its coverage as well as the Implementing Rules and Guidelines
promulgated in accordance therewith.:-cralaw
The constitutional provision under consideration reads as
follows:
ARTICLE XIII
x x x
AGRARIAN AND NATURAL RESOURCES REFORM
Section 4. The State shall, by law, undertake an
agrarian reform program founded on the right of
farmers and regular farmworkers, who are landless,
to own directly or collectively the lands they till or, in
the case of other farmworkers, to receive a just share
of the fruits thereof. To this end, the State shall
encourage and undertake the just distribution of all
agricultural lands, subject to such priorities and
reasonable retention limits as the Congress may
prescribe,
taking
into
account
ecological,
developmental, or equity considerations, and subject
to the payment of just compensation. In determining
retention limits, the State shall respect the rights of
small landowners. The State shall further provide
incentives for voluntary land-sharing.
x x x"
Luz Farms contended that it does not seek the
nullification of R.A. 6657 in its entirety. In fact, it
acknowledges the correctness of the decision of this
Court in the case of the Association of Small
horticulture,
forestry,
dairying,
SO ORDERED.
ISSUE: The
main
issue
in
this
petition
is
the