Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
To:
Subject:
Date:
In reference to your email, "Re: FW: public records request, 11/11/15", received by me
11/4/2016 2:18 PM central time, enclosed is the email in which I agreed to sign the letter to
BMJ.
David Jacobs
-------- Forwarded Message -------Subject:RE: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 3
Date:Wed, 4 Nov 2015 01:03:23 +0000
From:Bonnie Liebman <bliebman@cspinet.org>
To:David Jacobs <jacob004@umn.edu>
Thanks, David. Ill add your name. Let me know if this is incorrect:
Best,
Bonnie
I would be happy to sign this letter. Thank you for writing it, Bonnie.
David Jacobs
Stone?
Dear Colleague:
On Sept. 24, the BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal) published an investigation
entitled, The Scientific Report Guiding the US Dietary Guidelines: Is it Scientific? The
article (attached) was written by Nina Teicholz, a journalist and author of The Big Fat
Surprise Why Butter, Meat, & Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet.
The article is riddled with errors. For example, Teicholz claims that the report of the
2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee used weak scientific standards because
it relied on fewer reviews by USDAs Nutrition Evidence Library (NEL) than the 2010
DGAC committee and instead conducted ad hoc examinations of the scientific
literature.
In fact, there were no ad hoc examinations. The appendices to the 2015 DGAC report
specify the search strategy, inclusion criteria, search results, and AMSTAR ratings for
the systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and other studies used by the DGAC. The
attached letter documents ten additional factual errors in the article.
(Note: The BMJ article was timed to coincide with an October 7 hearing of the House
Agriculture Committee, where it was used to criticize the 2015 DGACs scientific
integrity.)
The attached letter urges the BMJ to retract the investigation. Please let us know by
Tuesday, November 3, if you would like to co-sign the letter. (Please also feel free to
pass it on to your colleagues.)
Thanks,
Bonnie Liebman
_______________________________
Bonnie F. Liebman, MS
Director of Nutrition
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L St., NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Allen S. Levine
Susan Mc Kinney
Fwd: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 4
Saturday, November 5, 2016 7:32:10 AM
Thanks, Allen.
Bonnie,
Best,
Allen
On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, Allen Levine <aslevine@umn.edu> wrote:
Pleased to sign.
Allen
Sent from mobile device
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Mary Story, Ph.D." <mary.story@duke.edu>
Date: November 3, 2015 at 4:02:56 PM PST
To: "Allen S. Levine" <aslevine@umn.edu>
Subject: Letter to BMJ re Dietary Guidelines--Please respond by Nov. 4
Al
I hope you will consider signing onto this letter to help preserve science and
public health.If you want to sign on, just emailBonnie Liebman
<bliebman@cspinet.org> and tell her you want to sign on and provide your
name, title, organization. Needs to be sent in by tomorrow Wed Nov 4
morning .I know there is not much time left butI will send you in the next
eamil the list of who has signed. This is an outdated list because Bonnie just
sent the email to me onSaturday and these are fromSunday so the list by now
is much larger. Boyd Swinburn just emailed that he signed on.
Mary
Dear Colleague:
On Sept. 24, the BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal) published an
investigation entitled, The Scientific Report Guiding the US Dietary Guidelines: Is it
Scientific? The article (attached) was written by Nina Teicholz, a journalist and
author of The Big Fat Surprise Why Butter, Meat, & Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet.
The article is riddled with errors. For example, Teicholz claims that the report of the
2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee used weak scientific standards
because it relied on fewer reviews by USDAs Nutrition Evidence Library (NEL) than
the 2010 DGAC committee and instead conducted ad hoc examinations of the
scientific literature.
In fact, there were no ad hoc examinations. The appendices to the 2015 DGAC report
specify the search strategy, inclusion criteria, search results, and AMSTAR ratings for
the systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and other studies used by the DGAC. The
attached letter documents ten additional factual errors in the article.
(Note: The BMJ article was timed to coincide with an October 7 hearing of the House
Agriculture Committee, where it was used to criticize the 2015 DGACs scientific
integrity.)
The attached letter urges the BMJ to retract the investigation. Please let us know
by Tuesday, November 3, if you would like to co-sign the letter. (Please also feel
free to pass it on to your colleagues.)
Thanks,
Bonnie Liebman
_______________________________
Bonnie F. Liebman, MS
Director of Nutrition
Center for Science in the Public Interest
1220 L St., NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20005