Sie sind auf Seite 1von 47

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

UBC 97 and ACI 318-02 Code Comparison


Summary Report
Executive Summary
Introduction
Recognizing there have been questions on the differences between the alternate slender wall design procedures
in 1997 UBC and in ACI 318-02, the SEAOSC Board authorized a Task Group to provide a comprehensive
review of the two design procedures. The ACI procedure was adopted by IBC 2000 and subsequent code
editions. As quoted in ACI 318R-02 Commentary Section R14.8, Section 14.8 is based on the corresponding
requirements in the UBC and experimental research of the Test Report by SCCACI-SEAOSC.
This summary report includes review of source documents, code comparison, and background of the design
provisions under UBC and under ACI, respectively. A comprehensive review of the 1980 test data was made in
addition to analytical comparison of sample wall panel design under each of the two procedures. Pursuant to the
comparative design and validation of the original data, a list of findings is presented in the Report. Other design
considerations though not part of the code comparison are discussed in order to encourage further studies by
other groups. The report concludes with recommendations to SEAOSC Board and proposed changes to ACI.
Code Comparison
Under 97 UBC Section 1914.8, the cracked moment is based on fr = 5 f c.; and in ACI 318-02 Section 14.8,
the cracked moment is based on fr = 7.5 f c. This also means that the Mcr (UBC) = 2/3 Mcr (ACI) in the application
of the two design procedures. In the 97 UBC, a linear interpolation between cr and n is permitted in obtaining
s in order to simplify the slender wall panel design for Ms > 5 f c Ig/yt. The ACI procedure employs effective
moment of inertia and a magnified moment for the combined moment due to lateral and eccentric vertical load,
also know as the P- effect. Table 1 gives section by section comparison between the alternate slender wall
design procedures.
Review of 1980 Test Data
This Task Group was able to review and re-analyze the original test data. Verification of the 1980 data using
adjusted lateral force and deflection data was performed. The analytical result follows closely with the bilinear
load deflection characteristic. Lateral deflection increases rapidly when the moment exceeds two-third (2/3) of
Mcr (as defined by ACI). The calculated moments for each of the twelve test panel correlate closely with the
empirical test data. The load deflection curves and plots for the low axial loads versus moment interaction curve
further validate the UBC design procedure. ACI needs to improve its methodology in computing Mu and Ie so
that computed results would follow a bilinear load deflection characteristic.
Summary of Findings
Summary of comparative design examples is given on Table 5. Design based on ACI procedure is normally
controlled by strength with service load deflection less than cr. ACI procedure significantly under-estimates
service load deflection in comparison to the UBC procedure with increase lateral force and/ or axial load.
Where wall panel design based on ACI procedures meets strength and deflection limit, the corresponding wall
panel calculation based on UBC procedure may exceed the deflection limit.
Recommendations
To calculate service load deflection, use E/1.4 for earthquake forces.
Recommend to appropriate enforcement agencies that adoption of the 2003 IBC provisions on alternate
design of slender wall procedure should incorporate proposed changes to ACI 318-05 Section 14.8.4.
Modification to ACI 318-05 Section 14.8.4 - delete equations (14-8) and (14-9) and the last paragraph in
total, and replace with the following after the first paragraph:
s = 0.67 cr + (Ms 0.67Mcr )( n 0.67 cr) (Mn- 0.67Mcr); for Ms > 0.67Mcr (14-8)
s = 5 Ms lc2 (48Ec Ig) ; for Ms < 0.67Mcr

(14-9)

Send a letter to ACI-318 addressing the concerns in using the ACI alternate design of slender wall
procedure and requesting ACI 318 to correct statements under Commentary R14.8.

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 1 of 47

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group


UBC 97 and ACI 318-02 Code Comparison
Summary Report
Task Group Members:

1.

Chukwuma Ekwueme
John Lawson,
Mehran Pourzanjani,
James S. Lai, Chair
Bob Lyon (ex-officio)

email:
email:
email:
email:
email:

ekwueme@hart.wai.com
john@kramerandlawson.com
Mehran@sbise.com
jslai@sbcglobal.net
rlyons@bjase.com

Background:
The original code development on alternate slender wall design was introduced into the 1987 UBC
Supplement through efforts of SEAOC Building Code Committee. The provision was based on findings of
Joint SCCACI- SEAOSC Task Committee on Slender Walls pursuant to full scale tests conducted in the
early 1980s on twelve 4 feet wide by 24 feet high concrete wall panels of varying height to thickness ratios
ranging from 30 to 60. [Refer to Test Report on Slender Walls, aka Green Book]. The design
procedure is predicated on control of out-of-plane deflection for serviceability under code prescribed forces
in addition to required moment strength.

2.

Issue:
In 1997 UBC Section 1914.8, the cracked moment is based on fr = 5 f c.; and in ACI 318-02 Section
14.8, the cracked moment is based on fr = 7.5 f c. In the 97UBC, a linear interpolation between cr and n
is permitted in obtaining s, the deflection at service load, in order to simplify the slender wall panel design
for Ms > 5 f c Ig/yt. The conceptual moment-deflection curve shown in the figure below demonstrates the
intent of the UBC provision. At the ordinate of Ms > 2/3 Mcr, using the straight line linear interpolation
between cr and n, UBC procedure gives a higher s, deflection under service load, than the corresponding
value based on ACI 318 procedure. When the lower bound is raised from fr = 5 f c to fr = 7.5 f c, the
design of slender wall panels based on ACI procedure may significantly under-estimate service load
deflection.

I''''
M.

,f ..- ..-

:>1 .!..)!5

:.~

::

,,,,,,,- - .--

Idealized Momeut-dcOeclion
\000

CIUVI!'

M"~.7/
i

M.

DcOcctiOll - in.

'"

UBcn

Mor.~oJfclll}1

ACI3U.o2

Mor-7.S \'f'.I,/yt

10

II

I ,

\l

'"

:\IOInf'llt Dt'Ol'ctioli CmT('

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 2 of 47

3.

Mission Statement
Recognizing there have been questions on the differences between the two design approaches, the
SEAOSC Board authorized a Task Group to provide a comprehensive review of the two design procedures.
In June, 2005, the Committee set forth to accomplish the following missions:
Document review
Review background of UBC provisions
Review background of ACI provisions
Perform sample calculations on an array of lateral force and axial load combinations
Provide summary of findings
Other design considerations
Recommendations to SEAOSC Board
Proposal for possible code change, if necessary

4.

Document Review
Documents reviewed are listed in the reference section. The Green Book, Test Report on Slender Walls
by SCCACI-SEAOSC Task Committee on Slender Walls, 1982 edition, was used as the primary data
resource. Records of the 1980 test and data file were retrieved from archive. An abbreviated summary of
the 1980 test panel properties and test data are given in Tables 6.1 to 6.8. Current draft of Design Guide for
Tilt-up Concrete Structures, ACI Committee 551 was used as the source information on the development of
the ACI design procedure.

5.

Code Comparison
Table 1 gives section by section comparison between the alternate slender wall design procedure based on
97 UBC and that based on ACI 318-02. The ACI procedure was adopted by IBC 2000 and subsequent
code editions. As quoted in ACI 318R-02 Commentary Section R14.8, Section 14.8 is based on the
corresponding requirements in the UBC and experimental research of the Test Report by SCCACI
SEAOSC. The ACI Commentary further alleged that the procedure, as prescribed in UBC, has been
converted from working stress to factored load design. This could also imply that the ACI procedure as
written is a direct conversion of UBC procedure. In order to clarify and clearly understand the two
procedures, several examples were used within a range of wall panel thickness, reinforcement ratio, axial
load and lateral forces. Results of the analytical comparison are discussed in Section 9 of this Report.

6.

Background of UBC Provisions on Alternate Slender Wall Procedure


Between late 1979 and 1982, a Joint Task Committee including members from the Southern California
Chapter ACI and the Structural Engineers Association of Southern California was organized to study the
design procedure of thin wall panels. Model building codes at that time limited the height to thickness ratio
(h/t) to 25 for bearing walls and 30 for non-bearing walls. However tilt-up wall panels designed with
variable moment of inertia accounting for the influence of axial loads and lateral instability such as P
moment were exempt from the h/t limitation. Non-bearing wall panels were designed with height to
thickness ratio well in excess of 36.
While the 1980 Task Committee members agreed that elastic lateral instability (buckling) might be overly
stated in building codes, the Committee concluded that full scale tests were needed in order to explore the
inelastic behavior of tall slender wall. As a result of this non-profit research during the early 80s., results
of the experimental work were presented in a Test Report on Slender Walls. The test results gave better
understanding in the performance of slender wall panels. There was no evidence of elastic and inelastic outof-plane instability for the loading range tested. Subsequently, members of the SEAOC Building Code
Committee authored and submitted proposed code change to ICBO offering an alternate design procedure
for slender wall panels. The methodology emphasized deflection control in addition to strength to assure a

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 3 of 47

wall of reasonable straightness after a service level loading. Required moment strength under UBC
procedure is based on strength design. The slender wall provision was adopted and first included in 1987
UBC Supplement. During the ICBO code development hearing, the deflection limit of lc/100, which was
recommended by the 1980 Task Committee, was changed to lc/150. While other minor changes were made
in subsequent code development cycles on distribution of concentrated load, the alternate design procedure
was not affected.
7.

Review of 1980 Test Data


This current Task Group was able to review and re-analyze the original test data. All test panels were 24
feet in height and 4 feet in width reinforced with a single layer of 4 # 4 reinforcement bars. Analyses
include adjusting the load based on the air bag contact area, the measured panel thickness and location of
flexural reinforcement. Moment is calculated based on the following equation:
M (test)

= wlc2 x 1.5 + P1e + (P1 + P2)

Where
M (test)
lc
w
P1
P2
e

= equivalent moment based on test, in-kip

= panel height, feet

= applied lateral force on panel, kip

= applied axial load, kip

= panel weight at mid height, kip

= eccentricity of applied axial load, inch

= deflection at mid-height, inch

Results are shown in Figures 1.1 to 1.12. The upper curve shows load-deflection of the test panel, while
the lower curve shows the moment-deflection relationship. On these plots, a factor equal to one (1) was
used. The ordinates for 2/3 Mcr (cracked moment) and Mn (nominal moment strength) are shown. Lateral
deflection increases rapidly when the moment exceeds 2/3 Mcr. A straight line joining 2/3 Mcr (at 5 f c) and
Mn represents the permissible provision under UBC. The calculated moment-deflection for each test panel
correlates closely with the empirical test data. The deflection limit lc/150 is also shown on the plots.
An interaction envelop may be drawn for a range of axial load. The P-M values are calculated for a range
of tensile strain up to 0.0020 based on the measured depths to reinforcement bars in each panel. Plots for
the axial loads versus moment are shown in Figures 2.1 to 2.12. Nominal moment strength at an average
load factor 1.5 times the axial load is shown for reference only. Except for wall panels 22 and 27, the
calculated nominal moment strength is within the P-M envelop. These plots further validate the UBC
design procedure.
An overlay of calculated moment-deflection based on ACI design procedure was studied. The plots for test
panels 22 and 25 are shown in Figure 3.1; and for test panels 19 and 28 are shown in Figure 3.2. Below Mcr
(at 7.5 f c), a straight line is drawn from zero to cr for moment within the uncracked segment. The
ordinate for Mu and u are calculated based on ACI equations (14-5) and (14-6) for a range of lateral forces
up to 50 lbs. per square foot and load combination based on ACI Appendix Equation (C-2.) In order to
simulate an idealized bilinear relationship, a horizontal line is drawn from cr to intersect with the
calculated value of u. It is important to note that the test results did not support the ACI 7.5 f c for
modulus of rupture in any of the test panels. Also, the ACI procedure does not appear to correlate with the
1980 test results.

8.

Background of ACI Provisions on Alternate Design of Slender Wall


Prior to the ACI 318-99, wall panels subject to combined axial and bending designed under ACI
requirements must resort to second-order analysis in order to account for slenderness effects and lateral
instability in accordance with Section 10.10. ACI Committee 318-D with input from Committee 551

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 4 of 47

introduced code change CD-121 in 1998. This code change was made in an effort to eliminate differences
between ACI and UBC and in time for the adoption in the IBC 2000. For computing service load deflection
the ACI procedure employs effective moment of inertia and a magnified moment for the combined moment
due to lateral force and eccentric vertical load, also know as the P- effect. Because the effective moment
of inertia and magnified moment are dependent upon each other, some iteration is necessary.
The ACI procedure includes an additional restriction for walls based on the alternate design to be simply
supported with constant cross section over height of panel, and revision of the axial stress limits from
service load stress 0.04 f c to factor load stress 0.06 f c. The latter is the same as applying a load
factor of 1.5 to service load. Within the normal range of load combinations for walls controlled by flexural
tension as currently required by ACI 318-05, the axial load stress will never approach this stress limit.
In developing the equation for the bending stiffness max = Mmax/ Kb where Kb= 9.6 EcIe/lc2, Committee 551
drew on the similarity of the Euler critical buckling load of Pcr = 2 EcIe/lc2 = 9.87 EcIe/lc2. ACI adopted the
same equation as UBC for calculation of Icr based on a rectangular stress block. However, the Branson
equation for Ie is used for the calculation of service load deflection.
As an alternative to the second order analysis procedure, ACI Commentary R10.10 and R10.11 explain that
the provisions under sections 10.11 and 10.12 present an approximate design method to account for the
slenderness effect of slender columns based on a moment magnifier. One item lingers on is the 0.75
stiffness reduction factor in the denominators in ACI Equations (14 -5) and (14 -6) and its appropriateness
for slender wall panels. The key question appears the lack of correlation to empirical data. In order to
satisfy an idealized load deflection curve, an equation to express the portion of curve between cr and u
under the ACI procedure would be prudent.

9.

Analytical Comparison
Upon reviewing example A from draft document of ACI Committee 551, [Tilt-up Design Guide Examples
Draft No. 4], this Task Group formulated wall panels of similar geometry for comparative analyses using
the UBC and ACI design procedures. Wall thicknesses of 6.25 and 7.25 inches were used for 29.5 feet high
panels; and thicknesses of 5.75 and 6.25 were used for 24 feet high panels. Basic axial loads of 480 lbs. per
foot dead load plus 500 lbs. per foot live load were applied with 3 inches eccentricity. The axial loads were
increased to two times and three times the basic loads in order to explore high axial load parameters.
Lateral forces of 20, 25, 30 and 35 lbs. per square foot were used in combination with each axial load
condition. The reinforcement ratios generally varied between 0.0126 and 0.0162 which were within the
maximum steel ratio of 0.0171 at 0.6b. Loading increment for both lateral force and axial loadings were
used in order to obtain the data points for moment-deflection curves.
In order to compare the two procedures similar load factors were used from the UBC and from ACI 318
Appendix C. Results of the comparative study are given on Tables 4.1 to 4.4 for single curtain
reinforcement. Graphic representation of moment-deflection based on the range of calculations for seven
wall panels are shown in Figures 4.1 to 4.4. A summary of the analytical comparative design is given on
Table 5.
ACI 318 defines Mcr at a modulus of rupture of 7.5f c. For the purpose of this Report, the cracked
moment as used in UBC procedure at 5f c will be labeled as 2/3 Mcr. The load deflection characteristic for
the UBC procedure is represented by a straight line from zero to 2/3 Mcr for the uncracked stage and
another straight line from 2/3 Mcr to Mn for the cracked stage. For any given wall panel with reinforcement
approaching the upper limit and with increase lateral force and/ or axial load, ACI procedure significantly
under-estimates the service load deflection in comparison to the UBC procedure. In fact, in most cases, the
service load deflection is less than cr.
For two curtains of reinforcement, the Task Group used a 29.5 feet high by 20 feet wide wall panel with a
10 feet wide by 15 feet off center opening. Effective pier width of 4 feet and 6 feet, with thickness of 6.25

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 5 of 47

inches and 7.25 inches and steel ratios ranging from 0.001 to 0.017, were used in the analytical comparison.
This is similar to Example B under work in progress by Committee 551. Lateral forces of 17, 25 and 35 lbs.
per square foot were used to provide a range of moments and deflections in this study. Results of the
comparative study for double curtain reinforcement are given on Table 4.5. Contrary to the single curtain
described above, the results for service load deflections are much closer between the UBC and ACI
procedures. Nonetheless, the ACI procedure predicts service load deflection lower than UBC procedure.
A summary of all comparative design examples is given on Table 5. The table includes footnotes for
Mu/ <Mn; Mu/ > Mn; s cr ; cr s lc/150 and s lc/150. Of 28 comparative examples for single
curtain reinforcement and 12 comparative examples for double curtain reinforcement, the ACI procedure
shows 20 cases s cr and only one case s lc/150. Similarly, the UBC procedure shows 2 cases s cr
and 19 cases s lc/150. The significance of this comparative study demonstrates that ACI procedure tends
to under-predict serviceability.

10. Findings
Based on an array of analytical studies and comparison of code provisions, our findings are as follows:
1. Verification of the Green Book (1980 Slender Wall Task Committee Report) data using adjusted
lateral force and deflection data was performed. The analytical result follows closely with the bilinear
load deflection characteristic. Lateral deflection increases rapidly when the moment exceeds 2/3 of Mcr
(as defined by ACI).
2. ACI needs to improve its methodology so that computed results would follow a bilinear load deflection
characteristic observed during full scale testing. There are concerns from other sources researching
appropriateness of Ie in the traditional Branson Equation for wall panel out-of-plane deflection
calculation.
3. Both design procedures are applicable to walls controlled by flexural tension. The ACI code now
defines tension control based on tensile strain, t 0.0050.
4. For wall panels with low percentage of reinforcement, panel design based on ACI procedure is
normally controlled by strength with deflection less than cr. UBC procedure is more sensitive to outof-plane deflection with increase in lateral force and/ or axial load.
5. For wall panels with reinforcement ratio approaching the upper limit, panel design based on ACI
procedure significantly under-estimates service load deflection in comparison to the UBC procedure
and empirical results with increase lateral force and/ or axial load.
6. Where wall panel design is based on ACI procedure meeting strength and deflection limits, the
corresponding wall panel calculation based on UBC procedure may exceed lc/150 deflection limit.
7. Designs using two curtains of reinforcement show closer correlation between the two procedures.
8. Control of maximum steel ratio based on tensile strain under ACI 318-05 procedure is appropriate.
9. The requirement for minimum reinforcement of Mn Mcr / is appropriate.
10. factor of 0.90 based on ACI 318-05 Section R9.3.2.2 is appropriate.
11. Load factors and load combinations should be based on generally accepted load factors from model
code (ASCE 7-05.)

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 6 of 47

12. Change of Pa/Ag < 0.04f c to Pu/Ag < 0.06f c for maximum stress at mid-height does not impact design
by either procedure since the normal range of axial load for slender wall does not approach the limit. In
order to comply with tension controlled requirement, the normal range of axial loading will be
substantially below the prescribed maximum stress level.
13. Approach for cracked moment of inertia (Icr) is the same for both Codes.
14. Serviceability requirement of s < lc/150 (or 0.007 lc) based on service load is the same for both Codes.
The limit was apparently set by Building Officials. However, it does not appear the ACI procedure
would exceed cr within the range of most loading and load combinations.
15. Seismic force prescribed on the strength basis will need to be divided by a load factor of 1.4 for
equivalent service load calculations. Further code development for strength design force level should
review the appropriate load factor for conversion to service load in serviceability check in addition to
the appropriate inclusion of dead, floor and roof live loads.
16. In the ACI equations (14-5) and (14-6) for u and Mu, the 0.75 stiffness reduction factor tends to
increase the required moment strength rapidly. The alternate slender wall design procedure includes
the P- effect; and it would appear further softening of the cracked moment of inertia is unnecessary.
17. In order to be consistent with ACI traditional modulus of rupture of fr = 7.5 f c and Mcr = fr S, the
corresponding cracked moment in 97UBC should be limited to 2/3 Mcr. For service load deflection, the
UBC procedure should be revised to: s = 0.67cr + (Ms 0.67Mcr) (n 0.67cr) (Mn- 0.67Mcr)
18. The following statements in ACI commentary R14.8 are found questionable and should be corrected:
Section 14.8 is based on the corresponding requirements in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) and
experimental research and
The procedure, as prescribed in the UBC, has been converted from working stress to factored load
design.

11. Other Design Considerations


All engineering design includes considerable judgment in applying practical research and past experience.
Building code provisions may not fully cover all design parameters. Some of those other design
considerations that were discussed within this Task Group include the following:

Effective Area of Steel Traditionally, Ase = As + P/fy. A unique problem in a double curtain wall
is that the axial load modeled at the center of the wall is being used to increase the steel near the
face of the wall, where its benefit is much greater than in reality. This tends to increase Icr and thus
help to reduce the calculated deflection and increase the nominal moment capacity. Further
clarification is needed for double curtain wall reinforcement.

Service level deflection the model codes in other countries and practice in some parts of the
United States are using deflection limitation of lc/100 as was recommended in the Green book.
While the original research showed no lateral instability for thin wall panels under combined light
axial load and large lateral forces, the enforcement agencies felt more comfortable with the more
restrictive deflection limit of lc/150 particularly in consideration of other brittle building materials.
This Report does not address the validity or usefulness of service level deflection limit, except as
an index in comparison of the design procedures. Parallel research is needed in service load
deflection in order to justify different deflection limits.

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 7 of 47

Location of rebar and tolerance location of reinforcement sometimes is predicated on availability


of commercial rebar chairs and the correct location of bars in orthogonal directions. ACI-318
permits 3/8 inch tolerance for d 8 inches. Engineers should review if such tolerance would
satisfy the design on thin panels. Construction observation should include the verification of
reinforcement bar location.

End condition versus simply support ACI 318 puts emphasis under design limitations the
importance of design based on simply supported wall panels regardless of end fixity. While some
fixity may be realized either due to continuity of wall panels at the floor lines or fixity at a dock
height wall panels, the inclusion of such end fixity to reduce service load deflection may be an
academic exercise and should be based on further research.

Effectiveness of Branson equation there has been questions on the suitability of using the
Branson equation, ACI Equation (9-8) for the computation of effective moment of inertia. One
academia from Canada pointed out that the equation may not work well for concrete members
with an Ig/Icr ratio greater than about 4. Using Bransons method (Ie) to calculate service load
deflections in slender walls, particularly with single layer of reinforcement may significantly
underestimate service level deflection. An improve methodology to replace the Bransons equation
for slender wall deflection calculations is currently understudy and is not available at this time.

Roof live load under service load combination, model codes allows exclusion of roof live less
than 30 lbs. per sq. ft. when combination with wind or seismic forces. ACI 318 does not address
whether such exclusion is permitted under load combination.

12. Recommendations to SEAOSC Board

To calculate service load deflection, use E/1.4 for earthquake forces.

Recommend to appropriate enforcement agencies that adoption of the 2003 IBC provisions on
alternate design of slender wall procedure should incorporate proposed changes to ACI 318-05
Section 14.8.4 listed under Section 13 below.

Send a letter to ACI-318 addressing the concerns in using the ACI alternate design of slender wall
procedure for service load deflection and requesting ACI 318 to correct the statements in
Commentary R14.8.

13. Proposed Changes to ACI


The following are proposed revision to ACI 318-05
14.8.4 Delete equations (14-8) and (14-9) and the last paragraph in total, and replace with the following
after the first paragraph:

s = 0.67 cr + (Ms 0.67Mcr )( n 0.67 cr) (Mn- 0.67Mcr); for Ms > 0.67Mcr

(14-8)

s = 5 Ms lc (48Ec Ig) ; for Ms < 0.67Mcr

(14-9)

Where
cr = 5(Mcr) l c2 (48 EcIg)
n = 5(Mn) l c2 (48 EcIcr)

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 8 of 47

14. Acknowledgement
In preparing this report, the 2005 Slender Wall Task Group attempted to do a thorough search of available
reference sources. Each Task Group member has performed and contributed to this analytical research and
the summary report. The Task Group wishes to acknowledge several individuals who assisted in furnishing
material for our analytical research efforts. Luis Garcia who is current chairperson of ACI-318 D was
gracious to forward the original ACI code change CD121 and the analysis by Committee 551. Gerry Weiler
who was chairperson of ACI 551 when ACI 318 was converting the 97 UBC slender wall section to ACI
format furnished material showing the comparison of the earlier analysis as well as portions of the current
Tilt-up Design Guide. Professor Peter Bischoff of the University of New Brunswick, Canada, shared some
of his recent findings on the ACI deflection equations. Other individuals including Messer Neil Hawkins,
Robert Mast, Basile Rabbat and Charles Salmon have also kept this Task Group informed.
The Task Group is indebted to the vigorous efforts of members of the 1980 Joint Task Committee and
those volunteer workers who devoted two years of their professional lives on the test program and report
assignments. We hope this Report serves as a closure to the earlier research efforts that continue to serve
the design profession and construction industry in future years. To the memories of those Joint Task
Committee members who have since deceased including Ralph Mclean, William Simpson and Ulrich Foth,
we dedicate this summary report.

15. References
1. ACI Committee 551, Tilt-Up Construction Guide- ACI 551.1R-05, American Concrete Institute,
Farmington Hills, MI, 2005.
2. ACI Committee 551, Tilt-Up Design Guide Examples Draft No. 4, American Concrete Institute,
Farmington Hills, MI, April, 2005.
3. ACI Committee 318-02, Building Code Requirements for Structural concrete and Commentary,
American Concrete Institute, Farmington, MI, 2002.
4. ACI Committee 318-05, Building Code Requirements for Structural concrete and Commentary,
American Concrete Institute, Farmington, MI, 2005.
5. SCCACI-SEAOSC Task Committee on Slender Walls, Test Report on Slender Walls, Los Angeles,
CA, 1982
6. Uniform Building Code, Volume 2, Structural Engineering Provisions, International Conference of
Building Officials, Whittier, CA 1997.

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 9 of 47

16. Appendix
Page
Table 1
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.4
Figure 1.5
Figure 1.6
Figure 1.7
Figure 1.8
Figure 1.9
Figure 1.10
Figure 1.11
Figure 1.12
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.9
Figure 2.10
Figure 2.11
Figure 2.12
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.4
Table 4.1
Table 4.2
Table 4.3
Table 4.4
Table 4.5
Table 5
Table 6.1
Table 6.2
Table 6.3
Table 6.4
Table 6.5
Table 6.6
Table 6.7
Table 6.8

- Comparison of Slender Wall Design Procedures UBC vs. ACI


- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 19
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 20
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 21
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 22
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 23
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 24
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 25
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 26
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 27
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 28
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 29
- Load-Deflection and Moment Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 30
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 19
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 20
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 21
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 22
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 23
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 24
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 25
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 26
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 27
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 28
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 29
- Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 30
- Comparison ACI and UBC Procedure for Test Panel Nos. 22 and 25
- Comparison ACI and UBC Procedure for Test Panel Nos. 19 and 28
- Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 -03.0 and Task 4 03.1
- Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 -03.2 and Task 4 03.3
- Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 -03.4 and Task 4 03.5
- Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 -03.6
- Comparative Example Tasks 4 - 03.0 and 4 - 03.1
- Comparative Example Tasks 4 - 03.2 and 4 - 03.3
- Comparative Example Tasks 4 - 03.4 and 4 - 03.5
- Comparative Example Tasks 4 - 03.6
- Comparative Example Tasks 4 - 04.0 and 4 - 04.1 with Double Curtain Reinforcement
- Summary of Comparative Examples
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Properties
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Test Results
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. 19, 22)
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. Panels 20, 23)
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panels Nos. 21, 24)
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panels Nos. 25, 28)
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panels Nos. 26, 29)
- Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panels Nos. 27, 30)

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
24
24
25
25
25
26
26
26
27
27
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47

Page 10 of 47

SEAOSC
Slender Wall Task Group
Appendix
Table 1 Comparison of Slender Wall Design Procedures UBC vs. ACI
Section
Reference
1914.8
ACI 14.8
1914.8.1
1910.10
ACI 14.8.1
ACI 10.10
1914.8.2
ACI 14.8.1
ACI 14.8.2
1914.8.2
ACI14.8.2.6
1914.8.2
ACI14.8.2.3
1914.8.2
ACI14.8.2.4
1914.8.2
ACI
14.8.2.5
1909.2.2
1612.2.1
ACI 9.2.1
Or ACI
Appendix
C.2
1909.3.2.2
ACI
R9.3.2.2
1014.8.3
ACI 14.8.3
1914.8.3
ACI 14.8.3
1914.0
ACI 9.5.2.3
1914.8.4
14.0
ACI 14.8.4
1914.8.4
14.8.3
1914.8.4
ACI 14.8.3
14.8.4
ACI 9.5.2.3
1914.8.4
ACI 14.8.3
ACI 14.8.3
1914.8.4
1914.8.4
1914.8.4
ACI 14.8.4
1914.8.4
ACI 14.8.4

Topic

1997 UBC

ACI 318-02

Title

Alternate Design Slender Walls

Alternative design of slender walls

Applicable in lieu of
consideration for
slenderness effects as a
compression member
Limitations

Walls controlled by flexural tension

Walls controlled by flexural tension

Maximum axial stress at


mid-height
Maximum
Reinforcement ratio
Minimum reinforcement
Concentrated load

Design as simply supported axial loaded


member subjected to uniformed lateral force;
Constant cross section over height of panel
Vertical service load stress < 0.04 f c
< 0.06 b
Mn > Mcr
Bearing width plus width at slope of 2 V to 1 H

Vertical stress Pu / Ag < 0.06 f c


< 0.06 b
ACI 318-02
t > 0.0050
ACI 318-05
Mn > Mcr
Bearing width plus width on each side at slope
of 2 V to 1 H;
Not to exceed spacing of conc. Load
1.2D + 1.6(Lr or S) + (0.8W)
1.2D + 1.6W + 1.0L + 0.5(Lr or S)
1.2D + 1.0E + 1.0L + 0.2S
0.9D + (1.0E or 1.6W)
Note: without Directional Effect use 1.3W in
place of 1.6W
0.90
when t > 0.005
0.65 + ( t -0.002)(250/3) when t < 0.005
ACI318-05
Mn > Mu

Basic load combinations

1.4D + 1.7L
0.75 (1.4D + 1.7L + 1.7W)
0.9D + 1.3W
1.2D + 1.0E + (f1L + f2S)
0.9D + 1.0E

- factor

0.90 2.0Pu / f c Ag > 0.70


OR
0.70 + (1-Pu/0.10f cAg) (0.90 -0.70)

Design moment strength

Mu < Mn

Required factored
moment
Cracking moment for
normal weight concrete
Service Load moment

Mu = wu lc2x1.5+Pu1 e/2 + (Pu1 + Pu2) n

Mu = Mua + Pu u
OR
Mu = Mua [1 5Pulc2 (0.75)48EcIcr]

Mcr = 5 f c Ig / yt

Mcr = 7.5f c Ig / yt
Msa = wlc2x1.5+P1 e/2
M = Msa + (P1 + P2) s
= Msa [1-5Ps lc2 /48 EcIe]

Ms = wlc2x1.5+P1 e/2 + (P1 + P2) s


Effective tension
reinforcement
Moment of inertia of
cracked transformed
section
Effective moment of
inertia
Deflection at Mcr
Deflection due to
factored load
Max. potential
deflection
Deflection due to
cracking moment
Deflection at Service
Load
Permissible service load
deflection

Ase = (Pu + As fy) fy


Icr = n Ase (d c)2 + bc3 / 3

Ase = (Pu + As fy) fy


Icr = n Ase (d c)2 + lw c3 / 3
Icr = (Es/Ec)(As+Pu/fy) (dc)2 +lw c3/ 3
ACI 318-05

Ie = (Mcr/M)3 Ig + [1- (Mcr/M)3] Icr

cr = 5 Mcr lc2 48EcIg

NA

NA

u = 5 Mu lc2 [(0.75)48 EcIcr]

n = 5 Mn lc2 48EcIcr

NA

cr = 5 Mcr lc2 48EcIg

s = cr + (MsMcr)(ncr) (Mn Mcr)

s = (5M) lc2 48EcIe

s = lc / 150

s = lc / 150

Note: Editorial changes in ACI 318-05 are highlight.

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 11 of 47

Appendix

00

-c
~ '"

w
~

50

'"
P,\,,,
L~O
PA." LNO

,
;

0
MID_HLl
GHT
DHL[ CTIO"MID_HI:IGHT DEfLECTIO"

"

iD,h.,
inc h...

"

"

"

;00
'00

;'00
00

,-

- -

' 00
'00

- liDe
m

>;,
HO
.00
'00

P
A,"l LNO
L~O
PA."

'I"""

' lA,

,
;

.\IID_HLl
GHT DEfLrCTlO>;
DHL[ CTIO'i
MID_HI:IGHT

"

"

"
"

inc h..
inch..

Figure 1.1 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 19

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 12 of 47

Appendix

""
""

.,
"

-u

""

,.

PA>'> Ll'O
L 1'0
PA."

;\IID.H[IGHT
DHLECTlO...;\IID .H [ I GH T DEfLr
CTIO"-

,'0000

"'"

in<h

imh

""

"

"

00
'00

-'\
-- ---- -,
.>C
ne
--

.,

! '1,.'1"-~

"

---

'00
'00 .

1'-00

'00
'00

"
,~,
,~,

'IA:.
'IA,

,
~
~

r L ECTIO:"
:U1D.HElGHT D[
DHL[CTIO:-;
~.II D . HI G H T

1'0
1'0

""

"'"

"
"

ii.<bn
h ..

Figure 1.2 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 20

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 13 of 47

Appendix

""

,
<
,;

i
l.LJ
"-"

,
, ..
, "
:

""

'""

"

PAl, L 1"0
:SO

,~

,I,I

;\I1D.H
t I GH T DHLr
CTIO"~IID.H[IGHT
DEfLrCTIO"

"

in,hn
imh
..

""

"

"

'00
'00

'00
'00

.,

"T

------ -... "\


.\ c>c --

.'

,--

.'

I.~ I"

-"

'00
'00
~ O
~O

' 00
'00

."
,~,
,~,

"""

'IAr

~
~
~.IID . HIG H T Dr FL[CTIO:"
lllD.HI:IGlIT
DEFL[CTIO:,\

1'0
1'0

""

"

""

"

iD<b
im.b...
..

Figure 1.3 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 21

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 14 of 47

Appendix

..

~,

..
~

"
,

~q

,~

,~,

, )IID_HIGHT

~ II D . H[l G H T DH
L CTIO:"
DI:n.CTlO~

"'"

so
,

"

u
inc
h..
~~

"

""

00

'"
,

00

'.

,'"

~I.

'",

.
. . . . ".... nc
,

,oJ
,of

''"'

-'1
." MW
PA.."
P.-\.....

.....

'',

"

:\I
ID.H [IGHT DH
L ECTIO"lIID.H[IGHT
DUllcnO:-i

"'"

NO
''0

""

..

"

iad
.,
~~

Figure 1.4 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 22

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 15 of 47

Appendix

..

f-t:t
,.

"

-v
-"

,~,
PA.>;

, :\IID.HElGHT

~IID . H [l G H T

1'0
NO

"

"

rNO
~
"
"
""
"

DHL
CTIO;\'
DHLCT10:\'

""00

u
U
in,k.,
inch
..

"

",I

'00

.,

\;.

"

,,001
:\1.

--,,~,

"t

---'
-- -----

. 'i ,'

-"1".
-"

PA.'>

....

,",.:I."

~
~

:\IID .H[lGH T DHL[CTIO..:\IID.HEICHT


DHLECTlO-,"

;"
,k.,
;"<k

Figure 1.5 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 23

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 16 of 47

Appendix

'"
@
~

r'
r

'"

'"'0

~
!'-v
I'- v '"
,~
,
,~,

"

NO
NO

"

u
4681012

"'1ID_H[lGHT
ID_HElGH T DLLLcnO:':
DI:r LI:cnO:':

'"

"

inoh.,

;00
;~
~I .
~I.

,,

- ",
- -,

;00

,~

= ,
:;::

::>

"

...."

,
,,

-, -. .-

",

!'-V
I'- v ~
I'.-Ie'-:
Pk"

"
0

,
;

'1,1>."
'1,;1"

,
~

'"

NO

"

"u

"'1ID_H[lGHT
ID_HElGH T DLLLcnO:':
DI:r LI:cnO:':

Figure 1.6 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 24

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 17 of 47

Appendix

...

...,
"..
,.

"

_w

1'- " ~~
,~
,.~

~IID . HIGHT
~11D.HlGHT

0000

D
EfL [ CTIO:'\
DHL[CTlO:'i

.,.

NO
CNO

in<h
..
im<h..

"

"

"

00
'00

.::0
..

oe

./
V
.

.--t.
--

:\1,
~I.

,'00
00

I,
UOC
1"'- "'C
- .-.- 1'r-V.

1'.

'00
'00

, ,,
,

.---

.-~.

~
~

,~

....""

"-...

lllD. HElGHT D[(L


LCTIO~lllD.HEICRT
DHLICTTO:'i

.,.

..

m,,
.....,

NO
NO

""

""

"

Figure 1.7 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 25

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 18 of 47

Appendix

.
..
'"

<

"

~"
~"

.
~

PAN1jL
NO
PANJjLNO

"

,.

"

'"

46&1012
~ i lD _HI:I GHT DEfLECTlO:'i
DEIl..LCTIO:"i
~IID_HUGHT
in<h..

00

; 00

~I .
~I.

00
'00

' 00
'00

,,
,,

,
, -

-- '\,
-"-

,
, ,

,
, ,

~"
~"

, ,

UOC
UBC

>Am
CNO
PAN! eNO

'I,~

~ I ID_H I:I GHT


~IID_HUGBT

,
~
"DEIl..LCTIO:"
DEIl..LCT10:S

'"

"

,.

"

im<h..

Figure 1.8 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 26

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 19 of 47

Appendix

eo

.
M

'"
"'"

J"ISlI
1"ISlI

,m
PA~

eNO

"'"-,

"

4681011
~ I ID_H I:I G HT DEfLECTIO:"
DEFLLCTIO:"
UID_HLIGHT

in<h..

'00

'00

<

-,
,"
,i,

"

'00

c0

'00

1, \1<
">-\1<

---

---

'10-"
jot- l,I

"

--

- ----

uoc
UOC

~
M

,m
PA~

~
~ I ID_H I:I G HT DEFLLCTIO:"
UID_HLIGHT
DHLECTIO:"

"

."

eNO

.--,
"

"

Figure 1.9 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 27

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 20 of 47

Appendix

""

"

!'- v "

"

~IID . H EI G H T
~IID.H[lGHT

"

--- ---

--~

DHLECTIO;\'
DHLECTIO:\"

"

KO
NO

PPA."
A.>';

inch.,
Inch

"

"

."

'"
'"
,.,oJ

---"_W
I'--.
--- --~
,
V
,
,
,

' I"",
',.loa

..

UIC
,~,

:\IID.H
EIG HT DHL
ECTIO "~IID.HIGHT
DULECTIO:-;

" "-"-

SO "
eNl

"

"

"

jud
...
;n<h..

Figure 1.10 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 28

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 21 of 47

Appendix

'"
'"
@

'"

~ V
~V

'"

'" r
r
Pk"EL 1'0
PA.'>EL

,I
,I

,I
,I

"I
"I

"
1

"I
"I

"

inch.,
in,b.,

lIID_H[lGHT
CIIO:'>'
\IID_H[lGHT DHL
DHLCTIOX

'00

1.

'00

'00

.00
'00

-- ---'\
---- -:.-

'"
,

-- ----

"

liDe
C>C
P.-Ie'\;
PA."

,
~

' I,,j,,,
'IA,
lIID_H[lGHT
CTIO:'>'
\IID_H[lGHT DHL
DHLCTIO:':

"

KO
NO

"

"
"

inch.,
incb.,

Figure 1.11 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 29

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 22 of 47

Appendix

'"
@

'"

'"
vV

'"

50

'"
Pk'\,'EL 1'0
Pk"EL

,I
,I

,I
,I

""II

\lID_H[lGHT
L CT1O;\'
"ID_HrIGHT DH
DHLCTIO,,-

'"

""II

"

inch.,

00

'00

'00

''00
00

-.-.

--- -- --V

-- --

'"

'1,,1.,

- - ---- --

"- UBC

"

liBe

P.-\.'-:
PA.
"

lIID_H[lGHT
L CTIO;\'
'1ID_H[lGHT DH
DHLCTIm.

"

KO
'0

"
U

'"
"

inch.,

Figure 1.12 Load-Deflection and Moment-Deflection Plots for Test Panel No. 30

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 23 of 47

Appendix
SEAOOCS'leJ!llierWaJ! Tm.Gro:ap
De>o'<! Dp irnItern.ction C1J!['\'e
\VaHlNo.
19
67..5
ksi
f'o :=
.0 ksi
E, .= 28,6110 ksi
Etl :=
15
ksi
."l,,'= 0.196 sqiu..
11 .=
9.
~
1..- .=
.0
~
P .=
36 kip
P/J\= 0.016 ksi
1:76 ll;ipfurl
~eo,~

P
lap

5iP'

ciDO
M

P/f'A

O.
0.00050.001
0.0054
0.0109
0.0271
0.05
.]0
0.. 03
0.]5
0.1&2

0
1
2
10
20
50

92
185
1
2T7

336

kipill

238 19.9
2 2 2Q.
246 2'0.5
2 8 21.2
319 26.6
438 36.5
59
49.5
935
n9
952
793
120 10Q
1350 ]]2.5
ktpfurl

&,

0.0336
0.0330
0.0324
0.0'l II

0.0236
(W159

OJ)l04
0.0052
1)-,00510
0.0029
1)-,001:0

~-ft

So

"m
Box

&,

),

Figure 2.1 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 19

SE.'!.OOCSteElier Wall Ta.s};, Grolllp


De~.Dp irnItern.ctioll curve
\Va No.
10
6..5
ksi

f'a

~=

.0

ksi

E,= 28,6llO

ksi

A,=
11 .=

35

ksi

0.1!l'
9,

sqiu.
in

48.0

1..-=

P
lap
25

iin

P=
36
P/J\ = 0.016

kip

276

~tpfurl

1>l'.("'''~

50

ciOO

400

ksi

Pff'A

0.0
O. 0050.001
.0055
.0lll
0.<:f176

0
1
2
10

2.0
50

181
192

.0
0.106
0.15
0.1&6

271
336

452
12
933
0
1204
136
ktp-iu

kip-ill

80..8 1),,00510

0.3
]4.0

.0030
00.002:0

kip-ft

So

"m
Box

),

Figure 2.2 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 20

SEAOOCSlemler Wall Tl!!d. Gro:ap


De>o"'_Dp irnItern.ction am'e

50

6..5
ksi
f'o :=
.0 ksi
E,= 28,6110 ksi
35
ksi
E,,=
"l,,= 0.196 sqiu..
9.50
iin
11=
48.0
in
1... =
p=
5,97 kip
0.013
ksi
P/J\
'rt6 ~p.i!JlI
~eo,~

J.cip

"":In

'0.

25

.5P

400

600
M

P/f'A

!'

0.0
0.0 5
o. 1
0.0055
0.0109
0.0274
.OS
.10
0.03
0.15O. lro

0
1
2
10
2.0
50

91
183
188
274
32.9

kip-ill

M
237

2 1
2
2 9
321

921
93

1186
1321
ktpin

19.
2Q.0
'2'0.
23.3
26.8
17.0
- .3
76.
78.
98.8
10..1
kip-ft

&,

0.0334
0.032:8
0.0322
0.0'2 6
0.0234
.0157
.0104
0.0052
Il)iJ){)50

.0029
1),,001:0

So

"r::!=--1.
Bl!I

),

Figure 2.3 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 21

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 24 of 47

Appendix
SE.~OSC-

fila

:=

E,=

A" =
!J.=
lw=
p=
PI1\ =
Mo(a.<~

ksi
ksi
211,
ksi
35
ksi
0.196 sqill.
.40
iwl
48.0
iwl
5..9'7

kip

0.017

ksi

M
209211
21
246
283

P
0
1
1

50

SleltderW Ta.3l.Grolllp
!}eT;'~op imteracti.all cm:v!!
\\1 [No. 12

P
Icip

10
2

25

50
' 1

UP
0
0

39

462

14

6ll

159

2115

733
1035

1050

kEpimJ

kip-ill

M
7.
7.6
7.8
205
n.6
J;;.5
Ja5
-7.0
61,

:5;1

0.0292
0.02;B:S
0.02:&4
0.0241
0.02
0.013
0.0108
0.0057
0,00I5(I

8-6.3 0.0021
87.5 0,0020
kip-ft

S.

~:tm~! 1"

S,

Bi!r

Figure 2.4 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 22


SEAOSCSleltder Wall Ta.sk Oro'llp
~.op

Wa No.

ilrtencti.all a~\'!!
B

'1:1 :=

67.5
..0

E,= 211,600
E,,= 35
,!;,,= 0.196
h=
34
48.0
lw=
p=
5.97
PI 1\ =
M;.(&,~

ksi
ksi
ksi
ksi
sqiu..
iim
iim

50

J.tip

2.5

UP
0

kip
0.017 ksi
235 kEpimJ

!>
0
1
1
10
20
50
1
1
141
2.2.6
282

Plf'A

400

0.0
0.0005
0. 1
0.0071
0.0142
0.0354
.05
0.09
0.10
0.60
0.20

u..-

M
U8
]4.0
]4.
16.3
la.
5
30.0
319.8
41.6
56.
6H
kip-ft

s,
0.0'2.29
0.0'2.25
0.0'2.2.2

.oure
0.0158
.0103
0.0081
0',0049
0.0041
0',0019
0.0011

S.

Bsr

kEpira

kip-in

.d==--1"

M
166,
1611
1
195
22
306
360
4 II
52
6110
760

-I,
" \A.

c.
s,

Figure 2.5 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 23

SE.~OSC S1eltderW Th3l.Grolllp


!}eT;'l! op ilrtencti.all run'!!
W [No. 1
6,5 ksi

50

P
Icip

fila =
.0 ksi
E,= 211,.600 ksi
ksi
E,,= 35
.,!;,,= O.L
sqiu.
!J.=
.38
iwl
48
m.
lw=
P=
1l.12 kip,
ksi
P/~= 0.023
235 kEpiim
Mo(a.,~

25

P/f'A

0.
0.0005
0.001
0.0070

0
1
1
10

0.02:29

0.05
0.10

4~,8

63.9

0.0122
O.

0.. 2:&
0.200

45
9a.

0.00."0
0.002

0.0352

400

600

22,

::;1

0.032-6
0.0321
0.0317
0.0270

26.36..

0.0141
~

M
19.3
195
19.8

106..

023

0.0153

0.0020

kip-ft

kip-in

S.

.d==--1"
Bi!r

1
S,

Figure 2.6 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 24

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 25 of 47

Appendix
SEAOOCSl.el!Ilil!r Wall 'Fm Goomp
])e1;.e op iJirtemctio:!l cmn
WalNo. 25
67.3- ksi
f'o :=
.0 ksi

B, ,= 2S,6OO ksi
Ee ,= 15
ksi
."t,,= 0.196 sqiu.
h=
(5'.13
in
!w ,=
..0
in
P ,=
.32 kip
Pf1\= 0.025 ksi
207 ~pin
MO(""'~

.50

P
klip

2.5

.1'.'1,.
1.5P
0

-rn
Bl!I

P/f'A
0.0
0.0005
O. 1
0.002
0.008.5
0.0170
0.0424
CUO
0.. 18
20
40O 0215

~,

0
1
1
2
10

HIS
190
19'2
19'5
221
2'5
50
39
113
.5 3
1.39
.59S
236
81
254
114
kfpin

kip-ill

0.0261
0.0258
0.025.5
0.0249
0.0215
0,0181
0.0120
0.0060
0,0050
0.0023
OA)(I1.o

~c

""1

~,

Figure 2.7 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 25

SEAOOCI.eli:lil!r Wall Th;:k Goo'lIp


~e.op .!JJ.1eractia:!l C\i![\'e
WalllNo. 26
.67..5- ksi
fila :=
..0 ksi
B, ,= 2S,600 ksi
E" ,= 35
ksi
..i!l.'= 0.1.6 sqiu.
fa;,
'5.ll:ll
!w ,=
in
.8.0

P ,=
Pf~=

"~""'~

32

O.

P
0
1
1
2

.50

P
J.:Jip
2.5

10

.5
1.5P

113

I)

116
226
..51

kip
ksi
k[pilil

-rn
Bl!I

kip-ill

1:

IS
IS5
IS
191
21(5,

]'3

2
3 1
51S
5 5

20.
28.
41.
48.0

OJ)2S5
OJ)250
O. 48
0.0242
0.02.08
0.0176
0.0116
0.0060
0,0050

'7

64.5
68.3

0.0024
OJ)(I1.o

820
kfpilil

]'.5
]'.6
]'.9

]8.0

~,

k~-ft

Figure 2.8 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 26

SEAOOCSI.eli:lierW 'I'a;:k Goo<lp


])e1;.-e.op iL."!er.l.ctia:!l CU!Ve
WalNo. 27
6...5 ksi

P
J.:Jip

f'a :=

.0 ksi
E,= 2S,,600 ksi
1.5
ksi
."t,= 0.196 sqiu..
ilil
(5'.00
48.0
ilil
!w=
P=
5.08 kip,
0.018 ksi
PfA~ =
k[pilil

"l;.(""'~

P
0
1
1
2

.50

2.5

10
.50
11.5
1 1
225
'1

UP
0
0
kip-in

M
169
1 0
1 2
1 6
199
22S
312
4
490
69

'm3
kfpilil

]4,
]4.

]4..
]4.6
]15.6

]9.0
26.0
],9.40.8
~

~S

5&.6

:;.,

0.0233
0.0230
0.021:8
0.02.2:2
0.0191
0.01 1
0.010.5
0.00.53
0,00.'10
0.002.0
0,0019

k~-ft

Sc

~1
Bl!I

"'1

:il

Figure 2.9 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 27

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 26 of 47

Appendix
SE,A08CSlP-I!:der W Task Gro~
!}el;~Dp Umteract:Wll CliIVe
Wa INo.

1.1

50

II

28

6,..5

k!ii

.0

ksi

E,=

k!ii

E,,=
./\,,=

sqiu..

!lip

25

ksi

!J.=
L..=
P=

iI!l

UP

.0

iI!l

.33

!dp

'P/~'=

0.019

ksi

M~""i!-"J=

--Y

'1l0

200

SI

0
0
1
2

12
128
129
132

0.0172
0_0170
0.0168
0.0165

10

1 9

0.01

1 1

0.0117

232

0.

81

288

O,OOSO

309'

25,.

.175

162

411

34.

":00

186

kip-iJI

438
kip-fu!;

.3. ElipiI!l

74

0.

O.OO:W
36.5 0. 15

kip-ft

So

"'1
:5 1

Figure 2.10 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 28


SEA08CSlP-I!:derW Tac;:};.Gro1llp
!}el;'e op UmteractiQll CIilC\'e
WaUl No.

29
6.5

k!ii

:=

.0

ksi

E,=
E" ,=
./\,,=
!J. .=
L..=
P=

28,.600

k!ii

35

k!ii

.31

iI!l
kip,

'P/~=

.019

k!ii

fila

50

~""~

'P

0.0
0.0005
0.001
0.

0
0
1
2

139
140
1 1
1 3

U.5
]],6

U.
] .9

o.oun

.0109

10

163

] .6

0.0154

186

]5.5

0.0129

!lip
25

0.021
0.54

0.196 sqiu..
fu!;
.78
.0

Plf'A

1).]00

0.00&2

338

OJ)QSO
'2:8.
34.9 0.0031
40.0 0,0020

(U5

1:33

418

(U95

179

480

0..200

184

200

4110

lap-in

h~-1.
Bu

486
kipfuJ.

I,.,

39 ElipiI!l

0.01116
0.OU15

253

LSP
0

SI

O.Olall

40.5

0.0019

kip-ft

So

c
&,

A,.

Figure 2.11 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 29

SEA08CSlP-I!:der Wall Thsk. Gro~


De,..e Dp Umteract:Wll CIilC\'e
WalNo.

50

Plf'A

'P

0
0
1
2

126
128
129
131

0.0170
0.0169
0.0167
0.0164

25

0.
0.0005
0.001
0.002
0.01.

0.0139

30

!lip

&,

65

k!ii

fila =

,,11

ksi

E,=
E" ,=
./\,,=
!J.=
L..=
P=

28,)6OCl

ksi

.0213

35'

k!ii

0.0531

230

0.0073

285

0,005
0.0042
0,0020

.I.~=

~""~

0.196 sqilL

..ll9
8.0
.38

10

0.011

iJlL

LSP

0.085
0.]0

309'

25..7

iI!l
kip,

0.170

40

ll.

0200

43

36. '
kip-ft

200

0.019 ksi
]39 EI:piI!l

kip-iJI

kipfuJ.

0.0014

So

h~-1.
Bu

&,

Figure 2.12 Interaction Diagram for Test Panel No. 30

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 27 of 47

Appendix
00

00

"

;.c

M,

J y-

' 00
'00

A DIS

. (1 4_
.(U_

--

--

- --

~ "- "'C V
V "

,,00[

,,,'"

1I,JBO
,115 0 /

m
An

,/ /

,.,-, Mo
"
D.,.
"

~ I ", (l
~I,,(l

Mo

m .,
m "

'AN
'"'

l/ /
'

""

"'I,, A"

~IlD_H [J G H T
~llD_H[JGHI

eNO

,.
"

"

"

DHLCTIO:"i
DHLLCIIO:'i

"

inch.,

00

f.o

; 00

""

/'
./

18_0~
ACI 18_0!
.-\CI

"C,

L
. (14_
[ .(H-

I'~
,' 00 I '~,...,.,/

- ------

1.115
1,,11500

"

,,

:U"
I, :U"

"',""" -- '-

"'

UBC

, // '

,I,ll"

" A"

>//

AC>
An

/'"

,
./

.;;:
0:::
~

7'

,
,
,
,
,
( 14_ ) ,
(14_
,
,
,

"

,.-' Mo
"
D.,.
"
'"'
"
,.
"
"
"
'Iu(l
' I " (l

Mo

m .,
m "

Doto

P.o.!'; eNO

'IID_HrIG HT DHLCIIO:"i
'lID_HEIGHT
DHLCTIO:'i

inch.,

Figure 3.1 Comparison ACI and UBC Procedure for Test Panel Nos. 22 and 25

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 28 of 47

Appendix

'00

> ~I,
~I ,

i'

M,....
:U""
10

/
./

M, ~ ,
M,t1!_O\
:/
,".'. V ',.
- \
"',
;'00
00

L.

....

,~

"o,
,

00
'00

"

UBC

10-,

It
V-

1/
V
.-I.el
AU

1/
V
(U
("

~Ia(l
~I "il

.'.'"
8

~IlD_H [J GHT
~IID_H[JGlfT

\In

m "

,-' '
" D..
"
(, m ; ,

PAl' eND

~I
~l

.KI
15-1l~
AU 1S-1l!

H )

~ .
~.

00
'00

/'
"'-

f'
r'

,
,

,.

Doo

"

DH L[ CTIO:,\in<h
..
DlfLlCTIO:'i
in<h..

00

~I",
(l
~I "il

'00
M (,11
~,

[1
11

"

L q.(( H)
['I.

------ -

''~-1ft-- --- - ,- UBC 7

"
,

I, A"
"
A"

-'

,,

-.: UBC

q (14

.\ C I
.\CI

~IlD_H [J GH T
~IID_H[JGlfT

~
11-"
'!I C
'C

r~

~~

,-, "IT

~- '

ACI <C:
": ..I.e!

8_
02
8_02

(, m ; ,

Doo

" "
"
"

PAl' eND

,.
"

\In

~"

D
H L [ CTIO:'\
DHLlCTIO:'i

Figure 3.2 Comparison ACI and UBC Procedure for Test Panel Nos. 19 and 28

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 29 of 47

Appendix

,..-.

-
,

a-.
c

i,.,

"'"
""
"UBI:
97UBC

<

'"'"
""

"

,,
,:

__

(1.(...6j
[['I'
'1.(1.(...6)

Vf
V
"'- L.( ---/
I

:U,lAC~

,,
,,

Eq(14.')

"'"-

0'I,

:\I,lACO

: [--IcISO

,,

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

,
,
,
,
,
,

,,

::--10 (l.'IC1 l ~l ... w:~


,

, ",

.. "
"-

/,

..

,
,

'"

->/),..

.-I.CI
l l-O
ACI__ JJIl-t

"
DrFLEC
TIO:"O
DHLECTlO.'"

I~

~: T.,k 4_0J.O
~ LOld
2
,
,
,
,
,
15 :,

c....

In,h.,
in
' ~ .,

" "-

"

>OO'- r____- .____- .____- .____- .____- ._____

-,.,
~

--"

"""'-f------+------+------+------+------t-----'"

!1

71
"."""'Li
LI'
t-/
+-:
V:
' ' "Be V
~l.

""

'000

"liBC

SOO

4J....

':u.(M~' -

31~!
f"

.\ CI _
~ .\Cl_31

,
:-'Iu

/
.i.ii
ii /
VT
- I ~ ,:, :: ~.;!
~.; ,~;----+----+----+----i I
l;il

-"V,r-- , ,

:\1,1>(11 )

Eq(14.9)

:
' 1:
:

I
III
II
I

I:q.( H
'1.(H

' ,: ~~
~~ ... j' ....
: ': ':. II
"
:
:: ~: ~ ~~
' , ~'"
:,' :
:, ::, ..... ~

,". . .
51

'

TTkJ..IU.l
.. k ~..(I3.1
Lood CCo..
Lood
... 12

, l
'-l, :

;' -1. 1;0':


'
:
,

IJ :\1.. 1AClI

1l'llC)

''~ I LQ:,
~ 11Q

"I
"I

"

HI

"

"-'.
"'.
"
Figure 4.1 Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 03.0 and Task 4 03.1
DrFLEC
TIO:"
DHLECTIO:-;

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

in<k
..
IMh...,

30

"

Page 30 of 47

Appendix
1000

"00

"/~I/:

:/

:/

97uBC
9WBC

~1i
~1
i
!/
1/
,

>;:: ,V i --s:::
vr

'00
M
,(.Un
'-',(.UI)

I :~"t :I
I1 ~ i

I,

IiIi

,~
I~

!i

I1
....
1
....1

,
,
,
,
,
,

:~ i
iIII:~

,
,

II

,,
,,

JI8 _ 0~
JIS-Ol
I. (U-lfl
( 1-1--6)

.L

'I"

.\I"(lllC)
(lllt)

;;1: ,
,,, iii:
,, ,, "
",, , , ",
,I:
, I: , ,
,
,
,

:;;1
:;;,1

,I. ! "

0 1:
1:

! r], :I
I:

M
,(.Un
'-"\A{I)
Eq( 14_9
Eq(14_9

~'CI
~'"
I.

~ ,
~,

'"

,.

,'"

318 --t1 ~
.\CI JI8-l1l

noo

"

"

7
7:

Ii
,

I,
I,
I,
I _ I,

inch.,

V
v
,
,
,
,

VI
V
,/
/
,:-='"
.. ... .. ..
V

"'"

I:

M , (.Un
'-"'''1)
Eq( 14_9)
Eq(14_9)

'00

"

/
""7/
7v

9HjBC
97uBC

M
, (.Un
'-',(.UI)

,~

1, ~l"
~I ,,(AC1)
\ACI)

h,k -1_03.:
Tk4_0J.:
Lo.ad C."" 1
2
Load

DEFLEC
TIO:S
DEFLECTlO:,\

,I,

_I:~
,

!i

'I' I

,
"
"

" ""
,, ,, ,, ,,

,
,
,

'-, "

~I" (lllt}
.\I"(lllC)

.,

I
10
110
1

'~II

,1,~i"\ACI)

1, ~ I,,(AC1)

h,k -1_03.3
T.,k
4_0J.3
Lo.ad C."" 1
2
Load

..

,
_1

DEFLEC
TIO:S
DEFLECTlO:,\

"I
inch.,

Figure 4.2 Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 03.2 and Task 4 03.3

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 31 of 47

Appendix

,..',--..,--,-----,--,------,--,

i, 00
/'
''''+-+----f!9h~/b..+___j
"
"
"CI_n....:

-- ,...~
'"00

"~'

~14-9)
')

'v
V Vi
V)

Ad llJ-O!
E'I.. ( U -')

.~c~oc~;2::l.7LA~:+_Lj--4"-'(-'-""--1---~
v
V ,i i !I
,
'7:
V
/
'
l',
~/v
,
:lV
,
,
-.::

" VBe

i
I
I

,,
,,
,,
,,
,,
,,
,,

:1

:\)(,,(l~
1,,(\., IIJll.o~
il )I ,,(AC1)

":
~...,e----"
.
.
f
:l+--1~"~-~iI-----~,..-...,--A--I
.,
n'
,
,

,
,"
, ""
;s,
'>i
so :
".:
:r-"
~.
: :.--'
.
.'
,
,
..'" .'... . ...,I: " "

"~"''::::H~~:
V , --

,,
,,,
,,
,
,
:
. ,,
,
:,,
l

, I

, I

,
,
,

<
.,,~.,

~
~(..

,
,

"

,
,

~
,

,
,,

~,

,
,
,
,

,
,
,
,
,

~:

T.,k ~ _03A
Lood
C. .. l
LoMC_2

...,.
,.. -..,.----..,.----'.~.:..:;::;;2+_--,----,----,---..,
;;,
,// :,
'.

DEfLECTIO:O;
DUU:cnO~

i n ' ~ ..

M.

r>cf
~
?
-I
''''-I_----I_-7'L-l_t~:=:=k,'~a~,~'~'ul;!''-I_----I_----11
I /
1;,
,
V
I
~
"'

:
1/
Jf1::
,",
A",I~'--i'f----t-----t-----t----- ,...,-t----;f.'t-7'''-/-;
t:
, ,
"

00

BC

I~

.\CI_ JlI-O!
Eq. ( H -6)
+(IU)

,, , ,,
.\I,lAC'
b(:-,, ,, ,,
,
lI(I4.f)
'I
" ",
JQO::
0
.\1>1/1(11,--=
I
l-1.;-:+'.r,r-;-;,~.r-+----+----+--- , . , ,.
iii ~ ,
I,
~;::
I~
T u ..{JU
,
-' i ,,

I,
~.I'II
,
Lood c... 1
,
,

,
,
"
,,
Ij, i Ie' ~,, :, l'.:, J:, II~
, , , , : ,
01:
";'.
'"
"
"
... '. "
in<k

DFLECTIO:oi
I.,h
"

1/ : :::
tI--II:
--.
1

,
,
,

M.. {l.X)

1/, M alACll

,-

1:;:1

..

DEFL EC TIO:"

Figure 4.3 Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 03.4 and Task 4 03.5

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 32 of 47

Appendix

A,c<,,~,

.;:
97 BC

v/

.u,(,"n

l;f-1/

Eq(14_9)

,:

I
I
I

: - 1.1

"

<;(

'"

,,
,,
,,
,,

,,
,,
,,
,,
,,

..0:
..,, -,,, ..,

\!"(lllQ

1,~I,,(AC1)

'

.g:,,

,
,

:E.1I4_1i'l

/T,

.,

V
,
,,

"

,,
,,

h,k 4_03.6
Lo.ad C."" 2

., '"
:
,,

DEFLECTIO:"

"

'"

incb.,

Figure 4.4 Comparative Design Procedure Plot for Task 4 03.6

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 33 of 47

Appendix
Table 4.1 Comparative Example Task 4 03.0 and Task 4 03.1
Sk-nd<J
w.1l T.sk
Group
Sku.s..-WaU
ra!okGroup
coo.. Comparisoo
Comp",i:IOD
coo.
T.sk~-1:Il
SummM)'
ofCakot.lioo D...
Da .. _ ra.Jo
4 "()1
SUIllI>IMY ofC.lcul>,i""
8.,.d
318_01 Pc.du....
Ba, .d on Ael
AClllB_O!
Proud". ....

""

M
L. ,... I For""
FOfC.
L.,."I

P .... I H<isb'
H";gb'
POD.I
P
....I Tbidn. ..
P....IThid"'...
Pon.1 L...
Longlb
POD.1
gIb
Eccllrieily
Ecc...tricny

..

""""-,

..".

.."
S..,.IRatio
S...I RollO
Moximum
RollO
Maximum S,..I
S1...1 Rob.

Foct<nd
Facf<nd Ax,.l
A",.I Lood
toad
Y.... g< Axial
A"i.1 Srr."
Sir...
A ,"ft1Ig<"
Efk.c,iy. S..,.I
Ar
Effoe,iY'
S... I AJu
M."""ot
S,""ogtb
Momoot SlrOogtb
0_90
- 0.90
R<quu<d
SIr""g,b
Roq,lU~ Slf""g,b

CrIchd Mom..."
Mow",,'
C"chd
S<r;-ico Lo.d Mo......'
M"""""
Soni<:.

,, ",,

\Oi
w

.'- ,....
,

0011..,110.
D.nocbon Limit

,
,

Ar..
Efk.c,iy. S..,.I
Effoe,iY'
S... I AJu
M."""ot SlrOogtb
S,""ogtb
Momoot

0_90
- 0.90
R<qlluNi
R<quu <d Slf""g,b
SIr""g,b
Mom",,'
Crochd Mom..."
Soni<:. Lo.d M.....",

'.

h,

A...
A.

111'

M.

lo_m
1<_
,0
lo_,o
1<_
,0

"""- ,
~IJ.
~l,l.

~"

''''M,
~1"

'",

'"
,

Doll..,,,o.
DO/locbon Limit

1<_,0
lo_m
1<_
,0
lo_,o
1<_
,0
m
m
m
m

..

~,
}>If
kip

h,

PI"A, h,
h i
'J"
,
A... 111'

A"

lo_m
1<_
,0
lo_,o
~IJ. 1<_
,0
~lJ.
lo_m
~"
1<_
,0
M.

''-

"-

~1"
10
213 M
lo_m
o 1<_
M, 1<_,0

, ,.
..
,
m

1Il!l.a
m
21l !I. In
II.,
In
m
lJl50
V'W

uu -

..,

1.0~D'1.28L+UW
1 . 0~D ' Ll8L + UW

.."

4_0J.l
4_03.1
16. :
16.:

4"()1_1
~-1:Il.1

5 . 7~
~.7~

5.n
U~

4_01 .0 4_0l.0
4_01 .0 4"()10
4_01 .0 4_01.0
4_03.0
4_03.0
4-1:13.0 4-1:Il.0
9.7
20
2S

~ -O3_1
~-Ol.1

4-03
_1
~-O3.1

4-03_1
~-O3.1

" " '"


'" " '" "
'"
" " " " "
" " " " '00" '00" '00" '00" '00" '00"

19 . ~
29.~

19.~

29 . ~
19.~

29 . ~
19~

29 . ~
19.~

6.l~
6.1~

6.l~
6.1~

6_2~
6.n

6_n
6.n

6.n
6.n

D
3_00
'.00

I~

7_68
7.68
1267
1167

7_68
7.68
1267
1167

5 . 71
7~
~.

~.n
~.1l

~ . 71
n
~.

3_00
1_00
3_00
'.00
'.00
'.00
'00
'00
'00
'00
'00
16
16H
1 6~6
1 6~6
16 if 6 16
16H
16 a6
16 11
1/ 6 16 11
Ji 6 16H
16 Ji 6 16H
Ji 6 16
Ji 6 16
Ji 6 16i6
16 Ji6 16
"6 16.6
3_B
3_B
1.11
1.11
1.11
lB8
lB8
2.8B
2.88
3.B
3.B
3.13
3.B
3.B
1.8B
2.SS
1.88
1.88
188
117 0.Oll7
0_0 117 0.01l7
0_0 11 7
0 .0126 0.0116
0 .0126 00.0126
.01l6 0_0117
.0126 0O.Ol26
0 .0126 0.0116
0.0116
O.OIH 0_0117
O.OlJ 7 0_0
O.OIH
o_om o_om
o.om
0 .0171 0.0171
0 .017 1 00.0171
.017 1 0_0171
.017 1 00.0171
0.0171 0.0171
0.0171 0_0171
0.0171 0_0171
0.0171 o.om
0.0171
371
37J
37 J
.1
37J
124
12.4
1l.4
11.4
1l.4
37
37.1
37.1
37.1
37.1
37.1
l!4
l2A
l1.4
l1.4
31.4
0 .031 O.Oll
O_Oll o.on
O_Oll 0.03l
O_Oll O.Oll
O_Oll
0_011 O.Oll
0.01l 001i
0.01l 0.031
0 .011
0.033
0.031
7.68.-1
7684
1167
1267

...

7_6B
7.6B
1167

;~
7.6B
1167
1267

""

"

ll4!
IUl
121

7.61
ll
41
1141

761
7.61
]]
41
1l~2

7.61
761
]]
41
1l~1

7.61
1142
1l~2

,. ,,.
,@,
'" ""
""
,eo
%,
%;
,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. m ""
'"'
'"
m
'" M
'"' '" ""
""
""
"" ""
m
no
m
no
'"
'"
'"
'"
"
..

lJl50
,'W 111

S<r;-ic.
Don..,hotl
Soni<:. Lo.d o.nochon

06p"
p.
kip
P"',,," h,
h i

8.,.d
B."d
on liBC
UBC 97 Prl><N1on
Pr<><N1n ....
Lat .....1 For""
FOfCO
\Oi
w
L.,."I
Arial Lo.d
Load at mid-b<,sb'
mid-bo,Yt'
p.
Axial

AY,"ft1Ig<"
.... g< IXIaI
. b...
utal .rr."
A

~
~

S<r;-ic. Lo.d o.nochon


S.,-yi<:.
Don..,hotl

}>If

Lo.d
to.d C.,.
C .,. 1
!

..
111

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

618
~16

121l
1212
1091

, ~
,~

1150
ll~O

1789
1610

2077
1870

928
918

1075
107~

7.S8
1.88
0 .40
0.40

421
9 .17
9.H
04 0
0.40

10_B6
10.86
0OAO
40

1.92
1.91

0 .10
O.lO
1.91

O.ll
0.31
1.92
1.91

04 6
OA6
1.92
1.91

0;;

~16

~56

219
7.636

418
14_98
14.98

18 _ 5 ~
18.~~

l2.ll
n
il

156B
lHB

0~50
0.~10

0_15
O.l~

0_55
O.~~

O_
~~
O.~~

0. 5 ~
O~~

0217
0.117
U6()
2.360

0.42
0.~1

0_52
0.~1

1.71
L71

1_36
1.l6

2_16
1.36

0_92
0.92
2_36
l.36

2.16
1.36

20
31 .7
3l.7
0_030
0.030

"

2S
lS
H.7
0_010
0.030

lO
H.7
0_010
0.030

lS
H.7
33.7
0_010
O.OlO

!O
293
29_l
0_028
0.028

!S
29_3
19.3
0.028

lO
29_3
19.3
0.028
0.018

l5
29_3
19.3
00.018
.028

7_68
7.68
1267
1167
ll 42
lln

7_68
7.68
1267
1167
128.-1
1184

7_6B
7.6B
1167
14n

7.68
7.6B
1167
1267
1566

7.61
ll 41
1141

761
7.61
]]
41
1l~2

7.61
]]
41
1l~1

7.61
1142
1l~2

"M

75~

8.-18

~;
941

1015
103~

,~
1009

111 4
IIH

1159
11~9

1184
138~

66B

750

813

916

9 .61
9.61
0 .26
0.26
0.94
0 .94

9 .61
9.61
026
0.16
203
1.03

99.61
.61
026
0.16
l .ll
3.11

1.91

1.92
1.91

1.92

M>

851

'"

1019
1039

1l_0~
13.0~

130~
13.0~

B . O~
B.O~

1.86
,.u

0_37
0.37
4_51
4.~ 1

0_37
0.37
7.16

0.37
9.82
9.81

1_36
1.36

2_16
1.36

2_16
1.36

2.16
1.36

04

0O.~O
.40

02
0.2
1.9

00.2~
.24

"'
"

'" "

'"
""

IJ.05
13.0~
0_37
0.37

470

lSS
6.40

Summary Report (January 2006)

'" " '" "

M'

'"
'"

9 .61
9.61
0 .26
0.26
0 .26
0.26
1.92
1.91

...

'" m
".
'"
'" '"
m
"" '"

Page 34 of 47

Appendix
Table 4.2 Comparative Example Task 4 03.2 and Task 4 03.3
00019 'l".lU"1\\. -'>\1"'15
:>SOY] 5

fo- t 'l".l - " '0 """0]0'1':) JO ,(,..m"",S


OOUlOdmO:) >'P":)

;:".:Jp.0"l

Lo.d C.,. 1

u-n

_Ol

tio. n +18C1 ' 0'0 -1

SEAOSC
Sl<wl<r waU T.!ok GrQ"P
Co&. Co_rison
Summ.aly ofCakut.,j"" D... _ T.!ok

I.O~D'USL+LJW

.. np . ... ' d ;:0-11 1 DY u o P''"S

,
'" '" "T '"
" " " " " ,,
.n
" " " " "
"'
" no-v

6.n

6.n

6.1~

<;n

6.1~

<;n

<;n

8tO-0

811)"0

.90-0

HL
HL
HL
l"f L
l"fL
'6t
'6t
lL10-0 lL l 0-0 H IO-O Hl0-0 lL10-0 lL1 00 E100
91:10-0 9<: 10-0 9<:10-0 9<:10-0 9<10-0 <:9100 <:9100
(l[
(l[
(l[
[l[
[l[
8H
8H
9 1 9 ~ 6 1 9 ~ 61

61

.90-0

.900

.900

~"

;:r-6

"6

8, S

8< S

ot[ 1

ot( l

Ot (1

1.[]

lH l

lHl
U S

lHl

'"

OLt
St6
t , OI

ltZ I
L111

OLt

, Sf

o.t

~,

t o

(lI'O

ot-O
19-6

ot-O
([(]

otO
[Ofl

9[0

61
lO

,6"1
9[-0

<:6"1
8[-0

8.0
<:61

<:6 1

lHl

lJ~1

8.1S

B~I

.W

<;1;<;1

1814

t 181

UO<

U~

66[]

[f9 1

.9S 1

."'"

on
11m
,,.
""
,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,.
11%

'" '"' '" en


'" '" '" '"~" '"

'" '"' '"


14.1~

<;(t(

0.l6

1O.l8
0.l6
9[0

1112
0.l6

11 0

OB

flO

017

<:6 1

1.91

9[0

0.l6

16.1&
0.l6

ao

Oll

[f 0

9[0

,61

,61

1.92

9[0

1.91

1.92

" "'

1.92

1865

9f O

' St

H.

0'"
0.5&
1.92

BI OI

OLt

U~

16Jl

cUI

9S l1

B.Ol

lJ99

SC9 1

'"
~,

6ltl

n-6

0.'"
038
1.92

B<:8

0'"
O.H
1.91

~n

&.28

Bt8

llJl

8.2S

lJ~1

0.l6
,61

8tO-0 sl1ro
<; -6V
<; -6V
<;6t
][100 ][100 moo
<:9100 <:9100 ,9100
S8"[
SH
SH
9 F 61 9 ~ 61
9

9.61

8.28

U51

<;900

470
450

1117

Inl

l&2

81&

U~O

91 9

9 a 91

91

O.ll

I05~

9.11

91

""

" "'

,6"(
([-0

,r6

"
""

"."" ""~"
470

9.11

1186

89t

OL t

'"

m
m
m

'.

'.
,m

o,-~

,
,

o"~I1S

l<l~Y >i~_, Y

'''''lI]

'1~

""
"
'1'1

m
m
m

m O>ln

"

.~

,.~

<~Y

"J~

o, - ~

Ai"",,,,,,]

,,""S

'1~

o,-~

~1 1>1'''d

"Y
'Yt'd

"

.fJ~

o,-~

'''<q>''Ill>1'''d
,~i"H l>1'''d

I'""11"'''Y p>.JOl""l
o""'lIl"'S ""'mlnl'l

'<l9 -0

oq

"

I1S

~(jo...,s

,0=01'1

060 - .

~,i"""S p;"m~

,,,,,mol~ p.~,..,:)

'~I'I

P'''1

"' _~

"""1 uO">01/'O
""">OII>(J P'''1 "' _~

d
''Ii'><J"1''''' '" P,,011<uy
'>.>011 ""'"
ump.>,o'd L6 :)1I!l u o P"'S

.'b,

6.n

1419

~10

1.92

B.,.d om UBC 97 PTo,rogn


La1<....1 FOfC~
w
Axial Lo.d Ol mid-bo,gj>'

5.7~

9.11

9.11

VIIO 111

H~

""
"
"'" "'"
"'" "'"
INl
"~
m
""
""
""
""

'"

H~

><:9

D.noetlOn Limit

~~l.l

'.00
'.00
'.00
'00
'00
'00
'00
'00
'00
'00
19/16 19/16 19 6 19 6 19 6 16 6 16 6 16 6 16 ;, 6 16 ;; 6
1.8&
2.S&
2.&&
1.&&
2.&&
l.U
l.ll
l.13
l.U
l.U
0.0162 0.0162 0.0162 0.0162 0.0162 0.0116 0.0116 0.0126 0.0126 0.0116
0.0ll! 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171
~9.5
~9~
~9.~
~9.~
~9.~
HI
7l.l
73.1
73.1
73.1
0-'J~8
0-'>4& O.O~& 0.W8 O.OM 0.06~ 0.0l\~ 0.06~ 0.065

'" m'"
" 0.'"
"'0.1 0.26

M,
~

s.r,'ico Load o.noetl""

5.7~

><:9

k_m
k_m

'C

~_Oll

"
'" " " " " '" "
" " " " " " " " " "
" " " " " " " " " "

~.7~

><:9

k_m

~~H

.<:9

Cnchd MCfI1<11'
s.r,'ico Load Memon'

'<
W+
'<

k_l"
k-,,,

~~l.l

.[9

,.,

'>.>011""'"

Roqw,-od SIr""gtb

SO I

+- 0.90

Mo""""t S...."gtb

A.

<:fOot

SIMI~.

(fO-t

EfftiH

b,

PJA, I<>i

<:fOot

AHI"g< Axi.1 Sir...

[fOot <:fOot

0.6..-

Foe",,-od .-u..l Load

[fOot

SIMIRotlo
Maximum 5,...1ROllO

,
,
'.

~_Oll

nO-t

E<co"lri<i'y

.J-Ol.2 .J-Oll

lS

n O-t

, ,
m

~~l.2

'" '" '" '" '"


" " " " .n
"
t,
"
" " "
"' " "' "

_._.,

,, .',

~_Ol.2

10,8

no- t

Pon<l H"Sbt
P....I Tbid:n...
P....l L~ngtb

~_Ol.l

'"
"
"
"

B.,.d om AClllB_01 Prodo ..


M
Lat...1 FOfC~
w

~O

~O

Ot t

"~

....." I''''' >i~_, Y

'Yl'd

,.~

,tIrO
O-tv

Ott
H

Of

Sf

~~.O

PIA, lai

0.W2

0.042

<:to-O

0.042

<:to-O

O.Wl

<: 11YO

M'
0.051
HO-O

M.'
0.051

[<;00

M'
0.051

[<;00
["1'9

L.OO

<>.IY I1S '''''>011]

"Y

,m

9'.l8
1101
ot[ l
,["6

696
90 11
ot[ l
n-6

9.11

"6

818

8< S

818

u s

Bt8

Bt8

"'"
UM "'"

U~O

tfll
t6l1
Ot (1

1151

lH l

1l~1

lHl

lJ~1

lHl

lHl

119~

In~

<;(ll

O<:[]

1.0 1
OO l l
ot( l
"-6

9.11

llH

W61

>t (]

tI[

t![

tlf

tI(

E(

'"

all
'1t!

0 1fl
01<;]

H[

Set

8 1 01
t.9

m
m

E(

,~

~,

.19

&.&~

.88

o,-~
o, -~

'1~

o,-~ "J~

"
'1'1
fJ<:

1/l M" k_m


M, k_m

SI01
91[

10.1&

8101

8101
It.

10.1&

1O.l8

0.2&

Ln
9[-0

0.26

8["0
9[-0

0.26

1.37

moon

1.92

,6"1

1.91

9l-0

0.26

0.2~

KO

0.2~

0.14

<:6"1
'Wl

J.5~

<;<;[

O.H

138

Bf [

<:61

<:6 1

'00

69>

1.92

,61

1.91

,61

1.92

'"
1.91

910

,6"(

,,,,,mol~ p, ~ ,..,:)

'~I'I

P'''1

"' _~

m DV f ll

"""1 uO">01/'O
""">OII>(J P'''1 "' _~

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

'M

8.81
0.14

00 '

In

'"

KO

VI j(}

0.16

un
m

B~I

1510
BIO

no
no
. ss

~,i"""S f'l'm~

o.noeben Limit

."

I~I~

.8S

o,-~

~(jo...,S "'''''01'1

06-0 - .

Lo.d o.noeh""

'"
'" '"
no
m
M' '"

10.1&

m
~
YJ ll.~ 111

~'ic.

"~

lJ20
ll41

1.91

Summary Report (January 2006)

1.92

&.&1

8.8~

l.69
,61

k_ln

1100
1051

&.1S

KO

'<

U~O

1011

8.28

.88

.ll ~

k_m

9.11

WL

~li+

9.11

M.'

0.0~7

H[

M.

k_m

'00'

'I~

s.r,'ico Load Memon'

o, - ~

Req";,-od Sb""g,b
C,,<kc-d Mom..."

dlll

+-

" " '" "

f"t9

Mo"",,'" S,,-...,gtb
0.90

A.

~O

,W

Effti,.. SIMI .......

" " '" "

(-1'9

_"

nal 'b ...

Jod

.-h-~~g<

"

Page 35 of47

Appendix
Table 4.3 Comparative Example Task 4 03.4 and Task 4 03.5
SEAOSC
Sl<n<l<J WoU
SI<n.s..W.U To!ok
r.!ok Groop
Group
Co&. Comparison
Cnmporuon
co&.
o!ok 4~_1)]
-1l1
SummM)' of
ofCakut.l;OO
D ... _T
_ r.!ok
Colculo"on Do..
Summary
B.,.d OR AClllB_O!
Prod". ....
Bo,I
ACI ]18_0~ Pr<>",dn,,,,
M
La,.
..1 Fo",
FOf~
w
Lot.ral
Pan.1 H<igbl
P....1Hoig!>'
Pan.1 Tbiclrn . ..
P....1Thidn...
P .... IL<ngtb
P....1L<ngIb
Eccltrieity
Ecc""lri<ny

,,

,,

~.
~.,

S"",IRatio
S... IRono
Maximum S,...l
S1...1 RobO
Raho
Fac1<nd .0."'01
A ... I Load
Foct<"",d
A ''<IlIg<'
Y<flIg< A.ial
S". ...
Axiol Stt...

Hl'ti,,,,
E~1iY" S...I.o.,..
S"",I AI''''
MODlOtIf Slr<tIgtb
Slr<ngtb
10.10""""
0_90
- 0.90
R<qUUN Stt<11gtb
S1f""g1b
R<qwr'"
CfIchd Mom<11'
Mow..."
Crachd
~- i~ Lood
Lo.d M"""""
M0ID<111
$<n'ic.

,
,

..

06,..
061'>
P, kip
PJ A, bi
'JA,

'.

A...
"M,

in'

;" ,.

1:_m
l<-ln
~V.
~lJ. bo
M. 1:_m
b o
~1a
1:_m
1:_In
M"
M, 1:_m
;;,

'"
,j",
~
I\..,

~- i~ Lood
Lo.d o.nhon
$<n'ic.
Don"""
D.n""bon limi,
Limit
D.nb""

,
,

~,

in

.n

"
~

V'~

B. "d OR
USC 97
97 P
I'O<N1nr<
B",d
OR UBC
PI'O<<d~,',
L
a,...1 F<lfC<
FOf~
v;
Lot.ral
w
Axial Lood
Lo. d ot
Of IWd_bo1g!>'
mid-I><Igitl
p.
.o.xw

.',

Y<flIg< ""01
1X101 .tt...
. "....
A ''<Ill!\<

..

E~1iY"

E~ti,,,, S...
S"",II A,..
AI''''

M o"",'" Str<ngtb
Slr<ogtb
Mmn.nt
0_90
- 0.90

R<qwrN Stt<11gtb
S1f""g1b
R<qwr'"
Cnchd
Mow..."
CfKkl MOO><11'
~i~ Lood
Lo.d M"""""
M0ID<111
s..n'i

'.

p. f

kip
P,IAo n,
bi
'JA,
A"
"-

M.

"

~I/'
~l,'.

M.

'"

in~

1:_m
1:_10
1:_m
1:_m
1:_10

.
, .
..

213 M" 1:_m


b o
M, 1:_m
;;,
~
~

Zll!l.a
lJl
lI a .n
~- ic . Lood
Lo.d o.n
hon
S"Yic,
Dof1b""
D<fl""bon limi,
Limit
D.nb""

lJl50 in
V'W

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Lood
Lo. d C.,,:
C.,. !

uu-

4_0H 4_034 4_034


~-1)H
~ _ 0 34
4_01.4
';"'034
lU
Il.l
25
29.5
29.5
29
.~
19.~
19.~
19.~
19.~
6_15
6_15
6_25
6_n
6.1~
6.1~
6.1~
6.n

"
N'

1.0~Dj-1.l8L+UW
1 . 0~D 'L28L + UW

~ _ O H 4_0n
4_0D 4-OU
~ -1)U 4_0D
4-OD 4-03.1
~-OD 4-01.1
~ -1)D
';"'034
IU
3404
29 _~
29 _~
29 _ ~
29 _~
19
.~
29
.~
19.~
19.~
19.~
19.1
19.1
19.1
6.n
7.n
7.n
7.n
72~
72~
6.n
72~
7n
7.11
7.11
711

" '" "

'" " '" "

" '.00
" '00
" ''.00
" '00
"
'.00
'00
'00
'.00
.00" '00
'00
21 M6 11
2 1 M6 ;W
11

;00

"

0 .0171
o.om

0 .0171
0.0\71
37
.1
37.1
37.1
0 .0330 O.Oll
0_033
O.OHO

.....

'00" '.00" '00"

1.00
'00
'00
'00
N>l6 N~6
N~6
24~6
N/i6 24~6
14 iffi N,;1\
14#6
lJl
l .ll
163
163
1.63
3.63
3.63
lJJ
III
Hl
Hl
Hl
1.61
161
0
. 016~ 0
. 016~ 0.0162
0_0162 0.0161
0_016 2 0.0161
0_0 162 0.0161
0_0 162 0.0161
0_0 162
0.016~
0.016~
0 .017 1 0.0\71
0 .017 1 0.0171
0 .017 1 0.0171
0_0171 0.0171
0_0171 0.01l1
0_0 171 0.0171
0_0 171 0.0171
0_0171
0.0\71
37 .1
37
.1
37.1
57.4
57.4
57.4
H.4
HA
17.1
37.1
n.1
HA
HA
HA
HA
H.4
0_033 O.OB
0_033 O.OB
O_Oll 0.044
0_04 ~
0_044 0.044 0.Q.l4
0.().I4 0Q.l4
O().l~
0.044
O.OB

21 ~d 6 11
21>1
21 M6
11
,; 6 11
3_B
3_B
lJl
1.B
1.B
1.11
00.016~
.0165 0.016~
0 . 016~ 0.016~
0 . 016~

9.9

9_89
.~

9_89
9.89

1~67
n67
61 8

1 ~67
1167
1071

1 ~67
1167
ll26
1116

9_89
9.89
1~67
1167
1~81
1181
1421
1423

111\1
1816

~~6

964
OM

1I9~
119~

~~6

~56

248
148
6_67
.~

~28
418
11.5
IU77

I~ _J!
I~.ll

;0;

0_~5
O.l~

0_~5
O.l~

0_55
O.~~

17.0<1
1708

19 .83
19.8J

0_5~
O.~~

0
. 5~
O.~~

0_24
0.2~

0.42
OA2
1_36
2.16

0_52
0.~2
2.36
136

0_9 1
0.91
2.36
1.16

20
33
.7
Jl.7
0_010
0.030

2S
H.7
H.l
0_010
0.010

lO
H.7
H.1
0_010
0.010

9_89
9.89
1~67
1161

9.89

I 1.5 ~
IU~

''''

2120
829
819

1653
165J

I 1.5 ~
lUI
2120
2110

1I
.n
IDI

1I
.n
ILH

11.55
lD~

2120

2120
2110
1617
1611

2120
2110
1869

I~n
I~~l

16B2

1112
I III

"M

'00 '
'00'

1228
1218

'"
'"
'" '"
'" '" '" '" '" m"" "" '"
'"
'"
'"
"" m m m

2_36
236

0>;

,~
1.66

5.7
~.711
0 .47
0.41
0 .21
0.21

7.66
766
0 .47
0.41
0 .29
0.19

0 .47
0.41
0 .15
on

11 14
11.14
0 .4 7
OAl
OAI

12_ 88
12.88
OA7
OAl
OA9
0.49

2.16
1.16

2.16

2.16
1.16

2.16

236
2.J6

2.36
2.16

lS
H.7
0_010
0.010

!O
5U
~u
0_019
0.019

!S
51.5
~U
0.039
0.OJ9

30

3S

~1.5
~u

~1.5
~U

0.039
0.019

00.019
.039

9.89

I U~
lUI
2l!0
1110
1424
1~2 4
1250
11~0

1I
.n
IDI

1I
.n
IDl

1155
lD~

2120
1120

2120
1110
1708
\708

2120
1110

un
m

"00

1625
162~

" " '" "

9_89
.~

9_89
9.89

1 ~67
1~67

1 ~67
1~67

1187

ll28
112S
1171

'M
'
m
'M'

'"

m
on
611

,,~

,~,

''''

129B
1198

16 11
1611
14B
14H

'"
'" ."

9 .~ 0
9.~0

'" " '" "


"M

,~

"W

,,~

'" '"
'"
>0. '"
m
'"
'"
'" ""
'"

I~ JO
14.10
0_37
0.37

I~ JO
14.10
0.37

I~JO
14.10
0_37
0.37

14 .1 0
14.10
0.37
O.H

12.18
O.l!
O.ll

l! .1 8
12.18
0 .32
032

l!.18
11.l8
0 .32
0.32

12_18
12.18
0 .32
0.12

lAO

1_24
1.14
2_16
136

5_07
~.07

6.91
2.16

O.l!
O.ll
2.16

0 .91
0.91
2.16

2.06
236

321
J.11
2.36
2J6

''"

1_36
1.16

2_16
2.16

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 36 of 47

Appendix
Table 4.4 Comparative Example Task 4 03.6
SEAOSC
Sl<n.s..- WaU r.>k Group
coo. ComparisoD
SummMY ofCokulat;on D... _r.>k 4"()1
8a"d on AC111S_01 Prod ...
M
L.,.ral FOf~
w
P....I H<iglll
P....I Thicln<..
P....IL<ngIb
Eccltricity

,,

~.
~.,

S"",IRatio
Maximum St...1Rabe
Fact<.-.d A..al Load
AY<rlIg< A.ial Str...
E~ti".

S"",I A....

M.tnIt Strlgtb
+ - 0.90

R<q",..ed Str<l1!th
Crocked Mom...t
S<r;i load Mom<nt

S<r;i load D<l1ectron


D<l1ectron Limit

,
,
'.
'JA,

."
."
'C

29.~
U~

"

m
m

..

I L91

I_m

M,
~

29.~

29.~

7.2~

7.n

7n

" " " " "

79.7
0.061

U~

29.~

'.00
'.00
'.00
'.00
'00
24>1 6 24>1 6 2U6 N~6 24~6
3.61
3.61
3.61
3.63
3.63
0.0162 0.0162 0.0162 0.0162 0.0162
0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171 0.0171

b,
b,

I_I.
I_m

..

0.061

79.7
0.061

79.7
0.061

79.7
0.061

11.91

11.93

ll.93

11.93

, ,,.,
'"
'" ,'" '" ...
'" ,,,
'"
'"

2176

24B

2176

2176

2176

2176

2019

2376

2732

,,~

lB02

2120

241B

IH~

18.H
0.47

..

HI
0.47

ILl6
0.47

In6
0.47

0.16

0.31

0.37

V'~ m

2.36

2.36

2.36

8.,.d on U8C 97 P,<><N1ur<


L.,.ral FOf~
w
Axial Load at mid-b<Ight
AY<rlIg< ax>al .tr...

.' .., " " '"


"
'"

W+ I_I.
I_I.

"",

u- 1.05D
1.0~D'1
+1.28 L + 1.3W

4_01.6 4_01.6 4"()16 4_01.6 4_0>6

06r-

A..

Load Ca,. 1

.'
'.
"A,

0.47

"~

0.61

2.36

2.36

" " '"

..

b,
b,

70.6

70.6

70.6

70.6

0.054

0.054

0.054

0.0~4

11.93

Effecti". S"",I A ....

A.

11.91

11.93

ll.93

M.tn<.t Str<.gth
+ - 0.90

M.

I_I.

2176

2176

2176

2176

~Ii+ I_I.
I_I.

1797

19~1

1~61

1687

20S4
1812

222B
1917

213 M" I_I.


M, I_I.

,~

m
m

,m

1l~4

R<q""ed Str<l1!th
Crocked Mom...t
S<r;ic. load Mom<nt

."

D<l1ectron Limit

,~

~
li1 !l. a m

12.28

'"

!l.U

12.2B

12.2B

0.32

0.32

0.32

032

0.42

1.94

H7

,~

V'~ m

2.36

2.36

2.36

2.36

S<r;ic. load D<l1ectron

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 37 of 47

Appendix
Table 4.5 Comparative Example Task 4 04.0 and Task 4 04.1 for Double Curtain Reinforcement
"AOOC
S - . wan roo.ll: Gowp
Cod< Comp>n>ool

S-mary o(CIIcIlla_ Dala _ r .... t-01


Bowd AClll~: hKHI..

,.,
,,

,~

1.aoonI FCilco

._--"'-'"
.....
P_Hosp.

P_lW'

......
,_ ....

~~s-IRoao

r......IOd As>.oll.oo4
A,-."'-' 5......
EtfKtn.. SIHl AI...
M_SIr"""

.-0-'0
~S'''''&do

C.-..:1:e6 M _
Sm~ l.ood ),I.",...

........ ""',
s.n~

Loo.4 DdlettooD

,


,....
" ...
'J.,
.'..
,
" ,..
'"'e" ,,....

A"

o.

""
""
11'''

.
,,'" ...

B....... l"8Cf7 r..........


1.Mlol r",..
"'-' l.oo4. ~P'
A,'ft"!" UI.Il'''eoo
[tr.."n.. S_l "'

M........,S......pIl

.-0.90
1t<quutd S"eqth
C.-d<<<I MOIIlftlI

Sm.,.,.l.oo4 Mo_

'.

A"

~,

,.'..
,..

" ,..
"

M.'+

,..

UJ M" k...
M,
~

V)~ ...

Son",. Lo.od Deflocho"


DeflocbOlllilllil

10'1 ...

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

LeodC... l

u-

1.0'D~UaLUW

O-W< nr.... "iIolor......


~-'Jb .l-O-I.la 4-().I.lb t4Ua ;l./)4lb

4-04.00

" "

" "

N.}
19.'
N.'
U} U> U> U>
.00
.00
.00
'.00
'.00
'.00
'.00
'.00
'.00
'.00
'00
'00
mi.} (1)100} (2)_ (2)- (2)1006(2)10oIl5
19.'

6_n

.~

19.'
62}

19.'

,~

,~

>3.

>3

G.DIH 0.0096 II.Ol~ 0.0101 O.Olil 00111


O_Olii 0.01i1 0.0111 G.Olii O.Ol1i 00171

21-0
0.070

,m

'"
u,
,,,

,U
,~
,~

."
m,

,21.9

D'
O.O:lll

n%

,~

1110

.~

'"
."

m,

'N'
m
'" m'
,%

ill

,%

lS}

1.17
D.SS

737

O.H

DS
0.11

,."

,."

U7

231

,~

1..J.6

1.36

1.36

" "

D
21.0

17.

lH

,~

G.GH

HO

Ua

-". ."
m

m,

,~

,n
324

.00

,.~

n%

'"
u.
'"

...

'.M
0.J7

031

1.11
(132

HI

2.U

2.36

2.36

,,~

'3

~,

19.2

ll.Sl

.~

D.S}

,- ".,
.m

'"
D

,m
",
US
6.01

D.H
l.i6

0.11

,~

,~

'"

" no"

D_OS]

,-

DOS]

1.!91

,m

W
'4\0

u,

729

''''
U.

,%

'"
",
'"

."
w,
~ll

11.0

720

832

032
2,21

on

231
236

2,36

H6

Summary Report (January 2006)

211

...

1,42
0,)2

2,63
2,)6

Page 38 of 47

Appendix
Table 5 Summary of Comparative Examples
Sumowy ofFiOOiny _ TaoJ<
Ta!ok 4 _ OJ
SumowyofFiOOmV

,-, ,-,
,, "
Hyu

TIuokne..

Si",l<
Curl. in R.infor<.m<n'
R.info". ID.n ,
SiD&I. Curt.in
4_'lJ,0
6,n
03
.0
6.n
!9.~
4_'lJ.1
5,7~
03
.1
no
~ . 7~
no
4_'lJ.!
5,7~
03
.2
no
~ . 7~
no
OJ,J
6,n
Oll
6.n
no
no
4_'13.4
6,n
6.n
OH
!9.~
4_'lD
7,n
03 . ~
Tn
!9.~
0]6
4_'lJ,6
7,n
7.n
!9.~

T " " Curuin


R . info. " m , n'
T""
Curtain R.infor<.m.n'
4_(-1,0.
~ _ N . Oa
6,n
!9.~
6.n
29.~
H4.0I>
H40b
~ _ N.1a
4_(-I.1a

29.~
!9.~

H4.1b
H4.lb

!9.~

6.n
6.n
7,n
7.n

!9.~
29.~

7.n
Tn

~ _ (~ .1 a
4_(-1.1.

!9.~

7,n
Tn

HH
H4.lbb

!9.~

7,n
7.n

P"".l

c,.,.

,
'-

15 .0
15,0
I ~ .O
15,0
15 .0
15,0
15 .0
15,0
15 .0
15,0
15 .0
15,0
I ~ .O
15,0

Rob.,

~".

Nomina!

~
Lood

Mom",,'
Mom"'"

b,''..

kip
AeJ Produ,..
_ AU
Pr"".dur<
33
.7
16 d~ 6
JJ.7
16d6
N;
16
#6
!9,J
~,
19#6
19
~ 6
~o
16 d~ 6
~;
2 1 #6
!I
#6
33
.7
JJ.7
!4~
!4
;; 6
115
!4d
6
24#6
70,6
70.6

AeJ Pr"".dul'<
P ....<.dur<
_ AU
19,!
19.2
(1) B
U~ ~
(1) IO#~
6.0 (1)lOiI~
156
~ . O (1)9;;6
(1) 9~6
11.0
21.0
~. O

'"
"
'"
"
'"
"

6.0 (1)9;;6
(1) 9 ~ 6
~. O

(2)10;;6
(2)10 #6

6.0 (!)
(2)10
1011#66

l7.
l7.88

11.0
l7.8
17.8

' I,

1267
I U!
1142
U~O
1J40
Inl
1J~1
1567
n!O
21!0
12176
176

660
~
850

MJ+ >M,
> M,
MJ+

..,
, , , ,,
,
, ,, .
, .
, , .
,
,
, , .
,

w -!O
- 20 p"f
psf ,"'
- 21 ",f
w -- 30",f
w -!~
p'f \Oi
JO",f
"

,
JI.

:U

" "
, ,
, ,
,
,,
,
, ,
." , ,

lI.
in_kip

;
;
;
;
;
;
;

w - 17psf
17 p"f
2
4
2
4

,
Jl.

;
;
;
;
;
;
;

~[

"

,
JI.

,"'
,,--35
-J~

~I

"

"

;
;

w -\Oi

30",f
30",r w - Jlp.f
Jj p.r

,
,

1293

'"

;
;
;

1196
1298

,
,

1~ 1 0
1410

, ",.,
,

MJ+ < M,
MJ+"M,

:""."

.. N_'

A",ol
A... I

~.':':&"

"J.o1150

",,"VISO

Si",l< Curt.in
C u rl. in R.in
fo,ID<n '
Si"l:l.
R.inform<n'
4_'lJ,0
6,n
03
.0
6.n
!9.~
4_'lJ.1
5,7~
03
.1
no
~ . 7~
no
4_'lJ,!
5,7~
03
.2
~ . 7~
no
no
4_'lJ,3
6,n
Oll
6.n
no
no
4_'13.4
6,n
6.n
OH
!9.~
29.~
4_'lJ,5
7,n
03 . ~
7.n
!9.~
0]6
4_'lJ,6

!9.~
29.~

Tn
Tn

r "" Curtain
Cu.u in R.infor<.",.n'
R , info. " m , n'
T""
~_(-I,O.
~ _ (~ . Oa
6,n
!9.~
6.n
29.~
H4.Ob
6.n
4H.Ob
!9.~
6.n
4_(-1.1.
~ _ (~.1.
7,n
7.n
!9.~
H4. 1b
H4.lb
~ _ (~.1.
4_(-1.1.
HH
H4.lbb

:,<"."

!9.~

7,n
7.n

!9.~
29.~

Tn
Tn
7,n
7.n

!9.~

P.odu ....
_ UBC Pco<.du

15 .0
15,0
15 .0
15,0
I ~ .O
15,0
15 .0
15,0
15 .0
15,0
15 .0
15,0
15 .0
15,0

16 d~ 6
1 6~6
16
iI 6
19d6
19
iI 6
16#6
16
;; 6
!2 I1 ;;~66
!4d
6
24~6
!4~
24
iI 6

33
.7
JJ.7
N;
29,J
4~ .0
4~.0
~;

33
.7
JJ.1
115
70,6
70.6

P.odu ....
_UBC P""'.du....

1267
IIH1
U!
U~O
1340
Inl
13~1
1567
n!O
2120
1 176
1176

(1)U~
(1)8#~

19,!
19.2

6.0 (1)10
(1) 10 II~
#~

1~ . 6
156
11.0
21.0
l7. 8
17.8

1196
1298

11.0
21.0
l7.8
17.8

1293
1~ 1 0
1410

,
,

"-,';:213
.....
2/3 ""

~. O

'"
"
'"
"
'"
"
~. O

(1) 9~6
(1)9~6

6.0 (1)9;;6
(1) 9 ~ 6
~. O

(2)10 #6
(2)10#6
6.0 (!)
(2)10
1011#66

MJ+<M,
MJ+<M.
MJ+ >M,
> M,
MJ+

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

""
""

, , , , , ,
, ,,
;
,
,, , , ,
;
,
,, ,, ,
,;
, , , ,
!

;;

,
,
;
;

,
,

,,
,,,
,
,
;

,
,

.....s:

113 "'a
Jl. a """
< .1, <
l.u l~ O
113
"J.il50

.1,
> l! 1~ 0
~>VI50

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 39 of 47

Appendix

Table 6.1 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Properties

}
~

.,ii?

.!i.!i.!i.!i
0

Il.Il.

h.

!;~;;;;;tO
~H:i
~~
.I~

I
"'
III.~
1 . ,"
,

,~ l I

"

! 11

~!~

~~

Il.Il.

UIl.Il.

Uil.

!
~

- Il.Il.Il.U:;.: .~

1l.1l.1l.1l..l:'~

h~~1iI~::;
~~!!~
~ ~~~~~
s~~i~~~

...... "IlM

::;:

el

'j}

~~

"j

ljll'j'
-~1~1ji
-.,
5 5 .... 1

... ...,"'IIli!-

HHP
mmlm mw

'llll'~'
<-.-.,
I
"j!

~i
el~
"" j::;:
II
.
~~ ~

,1 "I} )

!1
OJ'

l'

11H lIl,

j i, - - i -

~~ ~~
r:~~$ ~Ei
~
~~
~
.,

Ij

!l !'I'j j'"j

'.
j . -j.

"l

',!'
!!"l.

-j f
~
....
"
,
~
~

J JI ,I J1!
"
!' I
,'~ ll! i
.. ~ H

;
"
i
~

"J~ .

"~

Page 40 of 47

Summary Report (January 2006)

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Appendix
Table 6.2 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Test Results

S,L\OK._".r.....
>L\O!.C . sw-. W.. T.,~e.en.

r,.,...
c_ _
T....... C_ _ ' ....

- .'

-,

.........

0.-.(4) _ _ _ ....11
Di"-" (<1) " " " - "'" of...!!
~. ,
~.,
~
~
Rft . 1

""
""""
"","
"
n"

.~

.~

1.)!

,~

'"
'"'"'-1'
'"
,~

'-1'
J.7!
V,

" '"
,
'"

'"
",
vs
'"
,"

~-

.~

,--.-......

"
"""
,"""

n"
"

,
"

...
W
W

'",,,
,,,
'"
,,,
'"
'"
,
'"
,"
,~

W
.~

4.1,

VI

U~

'W

....-

\\ . _

'".
'

,
'"

, '"
."
'"
"" OJI

UI
~

HI

J.JI

.ti

,~

UJ

~
'-J'

1.1"

n,~
'l

''.Il
ti

0"

,~

HI

,~
J."

J.!<

l1.;0
.1'
'-16

!..Il
~
~

d . [1 .... _00110';'}. 100

HI
1.'S

HI
UI
! ..16
2.!'
W

' .12
'0

!.l
l
~

OW

OW

.~

l
l
~
.~,
J!
ll
~

l~
.11
HI
l.ll

, ~~~

1>-.&0. " ...


T_ ........
-..,...
. T_
.......

.-

C.

0.

~
~

'.'.--
,.'.-
'.'.-
'.-
,'.'.--
'.'.,.'.- """
,'."

. ...
VI

u,

I .N

v . . - ... .

~"

.,~

'

.m
.m
'.1. '.,.
'w
, ,
,.
,,'"
w
"
.ro
'
,'" ,

,ro
,

,
'" ,."
'" .","
,,, '"n
."
'"
'-'1
'W
"'" ",
_.1101011
.

'w
',,,
1.)1
u,
'","

\~

_s.
'-1:-'

.~"
. . .,

.no........"

.. _

.....

.
..
'.
..
..
'.
'.
'.

'.
'... .. ,.. ..,.,... ,..... ..,... ."
,. ,.,. ,.. ,.
,. ,.. ..
..
."
,.
'.
."
,.
,.
..

,..........

,..
,

..
.
.
'"
..
,.,. .
,,..

,-.-,-,-,- .... . ,... '.


,
,-... --.. .
. . .-.,
..,.

Pb<_,,, .........

p... No. _OIl.


n .d..... (10) . ....
.....
'-Is..

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

"

"0
".

~
.
~.

~
~

m
m
m
m
m

""
"

~.\
!lo!! .. ~

-,

..".
I;"

ill
. .,
UHl

iII 111
.LIl1l
.~. 1
-"1111
'~II
-Ll:!91
1
'~Il

lUll
"u,.,-,
II
"" ,-, 'U
'u .,u,
"
"
lHII
""., " '" lUll
"., "" ,U
lJ.O "nl
"" "-.
,a
,.,
"
llUI
B

m
m

~
~
~

"

ILl
>U
11.1
IU
ILl
H.I
ll.l
IIU
Ll
IH

11.6
lU

HO

H
H.II

II.l

~ I '"

iII a l
m ill
~~J.l l

!~1I1

),1'11

'".1 >11""
~'~II

'"

Summary Report (January 2006)

iII a l

Page 41 of 47

Appendix

Table 6.3 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. 19 and 22)

II

Ii
..

...
I

t
~

Ii

..

I
".

,,
~

~ :::
......

~ ~

:.1.
:. 'i ......
. . .
!!!~
""

"i
"j

H:I ,

>

.,
0"
.J';;:
.; "

....I; 11;;::
-- I:

il ilil ill

..

l
:. 'i ......
:.1.

>

J'

".". . "J.!

I '..
",

'""I -'''.',,':- ~.J::(


1'
"
'
"
.
~
. . ')<l
.1 !
""

" .

!,I ,_,,_ ro

- . .. . .
j......

::l;;~ ~I1 ":!~~

,
Ii,0 ,,
rli ,.'

';l ~ ,

.. ,! :::;

~ .. e

II!

!!
!
,0

.II

';l ~ ,

111

"

~-

~...........

riI ....
-'J .'"..r"
~
~

.!i .. '

"';~.J.<f
J.J::( ..I<l

~~!]!!~:U! ~ 3~ ~!

lil]]]'

Iii ,.'
: H"o
., i 1!
"
,.
II!
. .. . .
r o'1''"!"I"i]' ].'j......
"' ..r;.ww"..._'"
".
""
l!
~. 1, !

.J.

. ...,..., .., .- ..... -

~~~;tE:l!3~i~!:H~
'~;;la;:3:!:!~~;:Hf!;
, ~-~~-

:=l:==:=:::l::i~~a~i~
----- ~ :::II::::;j ::P.

=:!

' 1

'"' ""t ""t'" .., ""t ., .. .., ""t .., ""t.., ""t
,~
--~.=!':!3SE!!:i::
"-~ - -~ !53
--:t~~
I S~~355!
:!l:t

: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::
:: ............................
~

~
~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

i. =-"""""11;11; .
, ~ ~------------,~.:33
~ ~ :s sssssssssssss
SSS:!:!:!:!:!S:!:!:!

-
;.;Ii

f~

:lI
~

~;p~:::
:!;,., :.;!:;lI~

.. ::t-"2""~~

'~; ;~ :!!~~~~i;S~i

" :~~iI!I~::;';

.. ,- .. ::
!JI"'
.......
OJ .. _____ =
_
,,,
___;l;l.=::l~:;;:;::;
"
]l.;;;;~i;~;~a;ii1i
,g't;:;j;!iliit
1

..

""t""t""""~--

-------:::IIIII:~:.;::i
~~~
~~

-~~

:~~~S3~!~~~~~~!~
;;j
l'i ...

--...............

~~~~~~~~~4~44

'
~
~
,
~ '
~~

-...... . " ,- -...,-_


..
tf .,;

. _------------:============~~=
:: '.......................
~~::===========
' .---- "---~ .
.
~j1 ;;aa~;~;~i;;~~~=
................
.............
,~ ~ :s ssssssssssssss

i~-:::l:::l----------. ........ _.... . .

;.
.lI
:i :;:Ol:IlI:
I>'~~::;=::;~":;:
~
~~~~

~~~!;~~~
- .
!]"'
~~~

"]1
- ~.- -- .~.~ - .~
:~~iI!I::;:;ri:;iIOr;~~i':r."
3l2~;2;i~a~~;~;~;

,-f

Page 42 of 47

Summary Report (January 2006)

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Appendix

Table 6.4 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. 20 and 23)

Y""""'-

SI..\OSC
SE..WSC _ _ "w..
. y ... " , ........., " - ' ..... y ..., _.....

........" "-' ..... Y""",_,.... _w...


_w..,
,, .... sec"",
Sl.AOSC Y"",C_
SCCAC._ Sf..W:'Yd
C_'"..

._So
._So
_y",.. ...
,... ....
.......
......
. ,. ...... ._-.- ...
"',.....
.u .,.
C- ..
".,- . ..,.
-- "
,-

- . -_
- -.
It

.,uu

DoooY.,,,,,,,,~'Il

_ '-Bon
......
Ban
~

C-

n 'oII

k_
"' _

__"

"l. ...

p_

f". _

E. - ,.,..

u. _

~ ~-

.~

'i,'loa
'1" ",

....

c
c-

"
'll,

' .11

.... ,.,.

..'

"

..'
C- m, "
d .,, _
....
d",a
._ .J,

'"
W
,_
u,
,-
~ _

"u.
uo
, _.
uo
,'-"
U.
U.
..,, ,..
uo
u,
.., U.
U.

,,-"
.,
>0.,
." U.
~

,t.

'U
JI.'
....
,,_.

.
.
. ...

1.11
1.11
UO
1.11
UO

,,_.
0. .

'_U
._"
t."

1.11
UI
UO

,n
" .1
._"
,,_,
'0.11
_11
t."
".,
t."
._"
" ..
",
n.
OU
t."
,U
t."
'u
.~,

"'U
",,_.
...
n ..
no

.~,

,.
,_"

U.
1.11
UI
U.
UO
1.11
1.11
UO
UI
UO

'.lO

UO
1.11
1.11
UO
1.11
UO

71..0

.O.
...

1.11
uo

K'

.. "

L"
Ll'

, ...

.. '"

u
1.11

W,
,to

O-

. "

U.

'"f .....
..... a
_

"'.,.

,.

O.

O.

,.
,,.
O.

.,
m

,,.

U! .
UU

"-

0.'

107 ~

,w
"U

oo
oo

,,. ",.u
bin

...

,
,.
O.

...

1<1.1
m,

,,.
o. '*
m.'...
~,

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

to".
lO.'
",1.1

lJ

"
_'_Bon- "'
n o
'....
II
C- ,.
.u
.,.
m

~"..u
DoooY",.. JIlO.U
.......
u
.. ....0__...,
....
'..1....

...... Bon

"' -

C~

._-.- ....

,. ......

__ "

"l. ...

p - __ _
p _ _ __ _

f". a
_
f".

,,-

,0--

. .. . , .

E. - ,.,..
,~

.,.

..,.,.,,, ,.,
...,....
,,-- ,.

I.. U.
UfO __

.... .,.
,~
m

OJ, "'

"

,- "., ".

Cd'~f',a
.', _

....,-

' Il _

0-

'

" "

'f
_
'i .....
..... a

,.u,'" .

,~

'

,to
O.
O.

....

.n
..n

,~

",
oo
", ".0 "oo
"
, , . 107.'
oo
"
"
"oo "oo '"
,,.
m
O. 1"-'
IOU'
,,'-'
oo
"
, , . ,m
oo
m
"
O.
.0
..
,,.
o. mm,... oo ""
,
, . lOU
O.
m.t
oo
,,.
O.

- . - .- .
.....SO

~ ~-

(P,P.l/

._So_ y",..

scc.<.C. Sl.AOSC
Sl.AOSC Y "
,C
_
, . . SC<:.lC._
""
'C
_..

'I,'" ''''
' ... a_
~
~c
c-

.
.
.
.
.
". . .
.,
,.,.
,.,.. .. .. ,.
,'"..
...
.
.
..,,. ... ... ... ,.,'".

,.
.. .. ,"......
,,. "'
"' . . ,.
.,
.
.
..
.,
.
.

,,. ,,,. .
'"
... .. . .,
..,,. ,.. ........ ."..., '"."'".

Mj. ..... , ...... ,oo<.I.<W. . W,....'.U

....

0-

.,.

".... ,.
"'.
",m
'"

,,-- ,.,

~
~-

uw

.,.

.-

I.. U. a

.-

p _ _ __ _

Sf..W:'
...
",SE..WSC _ _ "WOO
. yY
""""'" " " - ,", "
- ' .....
...,
_ ,....
_w..,
........
"-'of
... yY
"""'_'
.... _
w..,

'.1.0 ".~

.........
\"00<.1.<"...........
.u;. Load ," ......
.. "'- y",<AW.. WI . ...',u
....A
P, P,
1,t.
__
. ...
1.11
.....
'U
,~
,,_.
t.r.
...,
1.11
on
m

.. ..
. .

(P,P.l/
(p,. p,)j '~
'-

" ",. uoo " "


...., ", uoo .oo,
".. t.ll U. ,.
,.
uoo
oo
'U
"
,.
...
.
.
.

oo
"..

"
,. ,, "
m
,.
'"
'" U. ,.
.,
.....
oo
u
...
'-'
,.
...
u
U.
oo
m
"..
,.
.... . m
m ..,
U.
oo "", '"
,"
,.
>0..
,..
...
oo , oJ ,
,.
,.
'" on
...
1'-'
UO
oo "
"0
. m
,.
.... . m.,
m .,
Ok
UO
oo ., ,"
'"
,.
,U
..... 111_' ...
UO
oo
m
"..
,.
n.,
UO
oo
...
n
.'
UO ,.
.,, '"mm
......
,U
.0
" ..
,U
OU
...,
,,~

..
..
.0
"'_'
.0

.1

'_ll
~
..,.
.~,

"--11
.....
W
l_U

,..

....
.0

'-OJ

,,_.

....
~

UI
,~
1.11
1.11
UO

.... .

.....
71 ..

.... .

107~

1.11
1.11

.... .

101.1
UlJ

UI
1.11
UI

.... .
.... .

IOU
'0l.1
I ....

.... .

.... .

111.0
1.
1.l
Ill.'
111.7
Ill.'

,,_,

'-OJ

1.11
1.11
UI

,,_.
0. .

'U '
lU'

1.11

I"~

...
...

U
U

.. ...
. ..
~

...

ll.'

...

JJ.'

"

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 43 of 47

Appendix

Table 6.5 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. 21 and 24)

SUOSC _ . ..
.. T....
T.... .......
SUOSC
II'"
c;r...,
Il.ol...-0: .
. . . ."'. ...
. . TOIk'_....
_ W..,
...,....,,,
~
T....
SCC.CI SUOSCT.",C-..
,. . SCUcl
Sf.AOSCT... ~ ..

SUOSC _ \ \.. T
.... .......
su.OSC_W..
TOIk
_ .
. . .~"
. . . . " ... TOIk'_'....
_W
, . ....
......
..,,,
T....
...
SCc.u:, SUOSCT.".C-..
Sf.AOSCT..., , -..
,. . SCCACI

_:

<_'....

,o.

._So. "
""" Tw;,"
...-,
'
.
.
'
_
.
.
.
.
,-1
,.
,,-- ,'" ..
_ T.....

~.,."ll
~"",11

.-

U . . ., , _....

,~.. ,
b.r.1l>r>
~"" . _ 'S

..
.
,.
....
,.
...... . .... ......
~ .

~ .

1'.1
f1.l

... .

""
""

.........
,,- ....
f'
f '.

,,- . '

...

,~

.... f

U'

,,."
C,

~-

'I, ~l.
1,. .

...

III _~- .

, II
f ."
1.1

,.

'I.......

.........
... ... V
"W.. ..... ...' ....
........... , ......
~.... "W..........'.U

.. ,

If.>

'u

11

..
..
1lI,
I.j
1.11
U.
'UI
.lI

"-

u, ,n "00'
u, .,
IU
00U
u," 1.11
",
.,
,n
.....
n, "00

... ,
,n 1.0,
.
ul .,

""00
0.0,
u, ,
w

"u00
..., u 1.0," ,,,.
" ...
...
"
, 1,0l
U, u u
00

u, ,,,
..
U
.
,n 00'

'''.'
'.1'
1.11
"U
U, I''''
."
0000
,.,
,n ."
.1,
'"
In
...
~p.

0,

p,

.'--

, .....n
,_.,._
.~
.~

".,

".....'
.,
."
It.!
'U

... ,
....
" ..

I'"'

n .1
11.1
fU
U

U,

1.11

.
...,.

UI
UI

UI

UI
UI

I.,

,..,~

f.ll
.'.11
...

1.11
u l

u.

UI
I.tI

m~
'IH

07.1
71.'
1,..,
...

....
. "
, ...

UI
w

0.0,
UI

w,

1.0,

"m.J
U

".1

U'
w

UI

",I
' '"'

.1
, OJ
".1
,..,

.,

UI
" '"
UI

UI

,n
,n
,n
.n
UI

' .11
'.11
...t
",1

1.11

II....

,.11
w

.' ".

U,
u,
U,
U,
00'

U,
UI
UI
0.0,
UI

1.0,

;W ~

"',
,.u
,...~

H' ...

lId
lSU
>It.!

m,
,,,,
,.1.0
lfU

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

00
U
00
.
.
U
00
.
.
00
00
U
U
00
00
OJ
OJ
00

"

~-

'I,~~

,~

"uu "
"
""u ,.
" ".
U

00

"u '"
'"
m
' m
00

w
w

H'

,u
,1.1

H.I
11,'
III
.,

,u
IU

.... f

fo
0
..

", .,

'S
.. ,
, "'--I
,'"

0
10

f1.l
...

""
""

... .

,"

-'''
" " ...
' t . 10.
lo.

11

I~I".

1M
'' 1lI

...

,-

1.1,
1.1'
I ."

..
0

'U,
.11

0
..

.~
.~

,~

'"
0..

,,
..,_.,._
.. ..... .- " '-.... - ., ,- .
... . ..
,,- '",,.,......
,- ..
'I......
~~.ll

,,.,.,-, -,,- . '....


,.
... . ....
aon

~ ... f.
~"",8m

f '.

0'

(P,+P,j<

"
""" Tw;," ''''11
'UI"I,_.."
.JOI . . I'_....

_ T.....
. . . -,
~.

..
.. .. ..'"
.
.
,,.
'".
.
"
..
..
.." ."" .,".

.,
"' .,. ,.
.,
.. '" ...
..."
,.,
'"

,.
",
n.1

_: ..,. .
._So

"
,.,- ........
'
m
,.
,"
,
'I......

I~ f" .
I~"'.

0''
..
..

.'" . ,.

-''' ",10,
""
't." .

<_'.... _w...

,o.

....

U'
1.11 _

~_

1,.
C-.

,IJ

...

I."

,.
,-

0'
10'
..
0

,.

'I.....

.' ."
J..

,.
....

.....
....
....,u,u",

.....
...
.
,

w
.
"

,,

."
J."
" .1 '.11

'"
II.'
....

.....
,. '"
". '"
~

0,

UJ
W
.~
UJ

0,

.
00
",,'
" .'
,....

...,1
.f.0l
.....

... ,

....

UJ

....

'.11
',lI

UJ
W

..

U'

....1

'.11

UJ
UJ
,~

, ...
II,.

l .....
. .....

.....
. .. .

...
" .'

....

II.'

1.1.0
I ...
In

"

l.....
,~

.....

.....

....1
J..

....

..
0

.. ...
... .
.
... .. .

"w....... ...'.... "P,

.u;. .....
... ... "\....
.\4
...... ,, ......
.... ""'..........',,.
.. f

0''
..

.~

(P,+P,j<
(J','P,)< ',~
'-

.,, "
"
"

"

,.
,u
,.
It''
' ""
,".
,.
m.' "
m.'
m, "
'"
,'"
", ,,',. .,,.
'"' " ., .,
,,,,
" mm
" ., '"

.,.,.,..,'"
U .,
I....

..,

IOL.

UU

116.'
' ' '.,

IMJ
111.4

lJ..
lJ..
lJ..

lJ.'
lJ.1

00
.~
00
00
...
U
U

).0

11.,1
.1

, .. ~

lU
III

110.1

'''.,
17'.1

lJ..

.. .

'"

."., .,'"
'"
Jm
II

".1

""

OJ.'

....

Summary Report (January 2006)

Page 44 of 47

Appendix

Table 6.6 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. 25 and 28)

t,,

:.

'il
iI 'i.'

,,

.I ..

:!~

;;

JJ

?;:~
~

~
~

....
~

:~~~~~~.I=!=5S~~
=~~:I~~~;;:li!~5S~~

::-.""
~~~~~~~~~
.
. . .
. . . -_
.. :"l::lIP: *,,:;:
-~.:~~~~~~
--~~~-~l'
::::::::::::::::::
:: :::: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :::: :: ~.
r:r:.=I:;:::
:;~;;;~a~e~~~i~i

=:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_ .. =~:t", .....

1111111111111111

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~
~

..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

';~iIo'=::l;~I~"t;="

i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

,~ ---------------,

>

i~""""""""N",~"~":"l~
]1~~~;;~3;;~aa;;~~

.,;:

~~~~~~~~~~~

"''' '''' '''''''~


'' ''::l
---~"
:lII: I'"

:;:ll~5!!=HH
::ot:!53a!!!!!

::~
. .
i-.t
1..1. ....

......
""i:Ol:;;:I~
'"

lI:::o1i!l5
S!!5!!!l
~-i!3=!S!!

"'!
"'I '":
-. """"
'"' '"I "'! "'\ ""l .'"
"'l .,
."
~.

.,
;.
1

.J''::
.;
>

J . " ..

f
~

;:O: "iII"I;j:l~nnl

1 ....
- III .... " .. .. .,
~'i=;3~;;~;;~~
1

" "'''''!'
~.,:;;l.:l'l;o::;;_::i
~<I:=~~S!3~~~~

>

~ ..... BBBB~B
~~~~~333333

;.
~ ..~!!!!!!!!!!!
!! !!!!!!!!!


"}."i

.<

~;,'i,)<d

~;;:~,
"
',~Ilr;; II< 1I:r;;::I:=
s:~:.;~
:of "'- ..,
=
. .. . .

! Ll

"-I
..I

..aII

. " '"

'''":::.1 t Il
.1 ......

.it
~

,
i,
.::

If

:!l-::I
1/1::::
I! '"
:l ",;~ "'I"!
10
1'< "'
~::

, I" ""'''' .' .t.t '' 'J",..I'"


II. I. " ,' .<.'

I i . . . . .

!;..;

::l

i. I... j" I -'-'


;.
.
,.(.r;::
'

"
JIHHI
' ~H~II

.... 0";: ..
,.,.
.J4
>

uil
, .., ,

iI

'j

!Ii
~~

.' !

",
Ih

II

II

'j

1~ ,

I.
i-!
i~ ~

II!

!i

Page 45 of 47

Summary Report (January 2006)

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

Appendix

,, !if
'.
, II
I

>0.

'"~

llU
IOJ
IOJ
IOJ

t; .. " "

M.'
DJ

.lJ

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group

UI
U
U
U
U

U,

' .U

I
I
I
I

UI

1"-"
1I.1J
lU.

UI
UI
1.11
UI
UI

.... ...
.... ,,-'

10..
10.1>
IV'

UI
UI
1.11

....
....

IBJ
lIil

....

"U

....

UOJ

....

Summary Report (January 2006)

u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u

OL1

II

"

' .' .' 1, .;

..,..
.....'"
u

0.'

n.

.1.1

".
.1..
~

n.'

"-

(p,"""

. ...,

... ,

1I.JJ

u...

P,'

'JI

"'

<

!
'"

~nl ill

I'"

n,

::ndHI ::l iii

u.,

IU

~..

"._
'-..

...

11.1
11.7

on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on
on

U>

l:!i;ii::iii, Ii: ES Eit 1!l!':i!:1::

>0..
>0.

ILl

L'"
U"
J.1I

UI
UI
UI
UI
1.11

P,

I'"

1J1.'

>0.

"

,.. '"
'"
,u ",
.,
,
.,
,"
,n
'"

11.-1
IV
IU

....

1"'''

.."

In~

"....
lJI.I

,"

.. "

P,
UI

InddHn; ill ill ill iii

.."
.."

>0..
>0..
>0.

u
u
u

~;;;;;;:=e:,.-:.,./':I"",..,.,.,.

.."

..

11.-1

1...

.. ~.lIt~IIl: .. :: .. l\.lI:l.";~lfd;;=

~
"l

UI

....
Ill.'
lU.1

;::

,.:

,,~

UI
UI

.."
.."
.."

>0..
>0..
>0..

.. 1ilt:!:;;:;;;;:;:;:;:::::;:::::;;;;;;

....

'0...1

UI

. 1.1
..~
A l

"-

:;iiifi5tiilH

1.<

U'
UI
UI

.."
.."
.."

(p, 'P,)O

>ii!:lI11t:l

....

'-'I
"'

U'

"

P~

........ "'.. . ...... <!'.

~.r;;;

....
A.

J.U

UI
UI

.... ....

....

Ul
UI

P,

~~~~~~~~~~:o~
..~HSE~!Jl1lil:
..
....... }..

...

1'-'

.. "
IJI

tt:U::t;U::eee

"-.

A
1.11

........... I" ...... I" ..

~\o . . . . . .

'"

In
IU
10.1

v"'-"'W. ".,....'.u

~~~~~n~~~

~t;H;~;a"'~<

"l

1=ai:~till:::;;::: .. '

Ali-LMd'W'"

.~

~
UI

,
,
,

'1.... -

Adi.-""' ..,... L<W.WL ...... U


'"

, .

-
'" . n

,.
...

.'"

"EC"""I
I: ,,:0
'ltl:;
;;: ""'
10 ..
'- __ io
....
:..10
......

c " "
c - n,

e::~:=t
~ _ 11: ..
~

u._
.. ,

-----....-...

-,- n,
,.J ", _ n.
~

'C

.." .....

::::::::::::

~ -

'1, ,,- _

...

11,_

.,.

~~::::::

.~.

[ ff' _

07~

"

I, -

.'

,--.""... _

.
, - ..
'" ".R
....

f '. _

'"
'" ...
.J,
O.
,

...
,. ,

' So ~

,;

Ii

j ..

,
,
,

"'

-
'"

.. _ W . .

,. .. ,. .... ,. ...... ,. ...... ,.,. .. ,. ...... -


eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ;;
.
!; } .:<< ....
e~E!i;t:;e ~~e~~~~~~n ~

'-77

___

,
.."

",:H~IUUI

c
c-

..,,

1I7 _

.......

11 I.

."'

.~

'C

d ,', _

il:l:~;;;

UlI ......

'1,,,- _

~_

__ -

~ -

~d!l

I' r;:Of.

t ..

~.

.. I' ......

.>l

f '. _

.U

"'

lSI

<
1' :< ....

,!

.' I:ff ~,n: ~u.'

~!!;

.. ..

lion

..... T.... _

. .If~ . .tillllllill:;j
- ,. .. I'I~..
.. '!i~~.!ii'"
. . . . . . iI_1i

"

Ii!!

;ehdHiii!!;;:

iil!

.---.",-"'_ .."......
-,, - ...
- ,
,-

J"J"o"'.,..,...fl""!,
'.' ~

'_OCCA.a SAOSC T"'~

.... T _ ..~~~l

........., .So..

W. T.... " ' -

iii

I'. i

~.

",{";:,rr~rJ"."'-r.... l!'~!"'''
'"
1,." 5

iii

SAOSC _ _

III

!"
~ r"

II

c.-.

'.

W. T ...

SI..WSC . _

- - . , """"' . . . . T ... ' _ .. _ W. .


, . . SCCACl _Sl..WSCT.... ~

o~ i:
~~

!'
d~I

Table 6.7 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. 26 and 29)

"
"
"N

ON

m
m
w
m

o.
o
o

*
".
".
m
w
~

Page 46 of 47

SEAOSC Slender Wall Task Group


~

,;,
~

i5 OiSE !':i l iUe

'1: 1 ~~" ; ___ . "


..... '-_ .. 10""10 "

:"

Summary Report (January 2006)

"_r
!-."

iii!~

.-' .

-".- .- ., ..,

fr

~;; ~

Ii, ;

aSSl; ii ;h l il~i:n::'li
~i5E5~~i~!~e~t~

Ii II

Ii
U

~!'"

II
U

"

!l

,
,
, ,
,, .,

I:f'.li 1[[[[1

..,
-"
F.
.
L
, , , .'_r

9
~

l>

"

,,.

.'
;; - .. "'II'"1i; ..~-~
. .. ... ;:~1

1;:1:11:1111'1:

;;; I
f:!..
,

,c

i)
,,,

;>r
~.I"l" ''' ''''''''!U~

l

J!r r

I'l
~ I:

; !E

.'
~

iO!;;: ;;: iO! ;;: iO! iO! ;;: iO! ;;: iO! iO!
/:'l:;!: "I ~I: 11 11::< i __
"':Il~ta"".:a:-!:t,.;;:
~;;: ... :::e;t::::
- .. .. ...
~ ........
' .. .. .... >-

iO! ;;: ;;:

e!!~~e!;~eee~~~ ~

- _ ._ I-

iii;;;;;;;;;;;;

- - .'" !.

~I:. ~il l! 1:~liI;

iO;:

fF

. ..... ~~~ . " . . .~

~~t
~

j;~

i;:

~ , " "

,.. ,.. ,.. :.. . -=


...c:c:,..... ,.....c:c:c:
..."" ,..... ,..c:c:c:c:c:~

",.

iii II slill!l: IlJIIl!lIIa

;;;;;;;;;;;\1:;;;

I!~~

If

....
liii iiiili iiliiiiiiii( !
" ,.
.. .
~~~ ......
t:'* " .'~~ ~ i-
,.
, .
E~~g!e!~:
..eg
-", .' .

=:~;lE E~ ;:: :::~:ei!:'!.i

. ~~

." ,

j>r;:'Ft
.. f'l"
' '' .,..r!l~it

,.I:;!!O -I! ~I=


""'!.II1: !l.. iI .~,.I
l i!! :l
..,
...
~~~~~~~~~~~-.. ~ "' " ff~, I' ~H~ I' ~
~~~~~~~~~~~_.~

zl: .. :.:l:ll ..
11;;;l'll
,._ .. 11 :

r""'~!""l"'ee!O'.oep.
" ~,.,."ieee""t>[
_t::=_ Ii:j(

/l/: ~~t:t:
"
....
_ .... . ..~ ..:;:II:i=
_ . ...
~"'l
~:c~Eei:~~~~!i
,

IiI

I',I j

h~
, .. i

iii

r.i

II"I

h~
!'.',

iii

II

Appendix

Table 6.8 Summary of 1980 Test Panel Data (Panel Nos. 26 and 30)

Page 47 of 47

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen