Sie sind auf Seite 1von 32

CEB Finance Leadership Council

Maximizing the Impact


of Your Communications
Communication Styles Diagnostic and Playbook

A Framework for Member Conversations


The mission of The Corporate Executive Board Company (CEB) and its affiliates is to unlock the potential of organizations and leaders by advancing the science and practice of
management. When we bring leaders together, it is crucial that our discussions neither restrict competition nor improperly share inside information. All other conversations are welcomed
and encouraged.
Confidentiality and Intellectual Property
These materials have been prepared by CEB for the exclusive and individual use of our member companies. These materials contain valuable confidential and proprietary information
belonging to CEB, and they may not be shared with any third party (including independent contractors and consultants) without the prior approval of CEB. CEB retains any and all
intellectual property rights in these materials and requires retention of the copyright mark on all pages reproduced.
Legal Caveat
CEB is not able to guarantee the accuracy of the information or analysis contained in these materials. Furthermore, CEB is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or any other
professional services. CEB specifically disclaims liability for any damages, claims, or losses that may arise from a) any errors or omissions in these materials, whether caused by CEB or
its sources, or b) reliance upon any recommendation made by CEB.

HOW TO USE THIS WORKBOOK


Overview
This workbook is designed for finance staff who wish to improve their communication skills and be viewed as a
more solutions-oriented partner by the business and aims to address specific communication styles common within
Finance and the organization. The information is based on David Merrill and Roger Reids Personal Styles and Effective
Performance and our own analysis. The workbook introduces a communications styles framework that is instructive for
diagnosing individuals communication styles.
As you complete this workbook, keep in mind the following:

This workbook provides frameworks and techniques in several dimensions of communication and listening.
This workbook is not designed to be a comprehensive solution for all development opportunities; rather, it focuses on
a few discrete areas where finance employees tend to struggle.
This workbook is designed to be interactive. We recommend you carve out time to work on a specific section by
yourself or as a team.

Goals
This workbook is designed to help you build your communication and listening skills, which will enhance your ability to:

Adapt your communication style for various audiences to ensure your message is understood,

Exhibit active listening to more fully comprehend the messages of others,

Clarify your messages to drive others to action, and

Appear more solutions-oriented to business partners.

For more information on how we can help you communicate more effectively with stakeholders, please contact
Eisha Tierney Armstrong at tierneye@executiveboard.com.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

UNDERSTANDING THE FRAMEWORK


The quadrant below presents two diametrically opposed views of how people communicate and what they respond to. The horizontal axis
shows the distance between asking and telling. The vertical axis represents the focus on relationships versus tasks. Keep these elements in
mind as you complete the exercises on the following pages, and make a mental note of where you self-identify.

Relationship

Ask

Tell

Ask: Focuses on the need to clarify


communication through questions
and discussion
Tell: Focuses on the need to assert
through statements
Relationship: Focuses on people,
communication, group involvement,
morale, support, feedback, and
facilitating group interaction
Task: Focuses on process and
outcomes, production, structure,
directing, and control

Task

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

A more complex and


interdependent work
environment requires
better communication
skills.

The New Work Environment

Employees increasingly work


with multiple time zones and
cultures.
Employees work with peers
throughout the organization,
not just within a formal
reporting structure.

Change in Amount of Work with Coworkers


in Another Location in the Past Three Years

Change in Time Spent Finding and Reviewing


Data and Information in the Past Three Years

Percentage of Employees

Percentage of Employees

5%
Decreased

6%
Decreased
57%
Increased

18%
Stayed
the Same

38%
Stayed the
Same

76%
Increased

n = 23,339.

n = 23,339.

Source: CEB 2012 High Performance Survey.

Source: CEB 2012 High Performance Survey.

Percentage of Employees Who Regularly


Coordinate with Various Groups

Change in Reliance on Others in Past Three

67%

70%

66%

63%

57%

Percentage of Employees
9%
Decreased

35%

0%

41%
Stayed the
Same
People on
Different
Teams

People at
Different
Job Levels

People in
Different
Locations

People
Outside
of My
Department
or Function

50%
Increased

n = 23,339.
Source: CEB 2012 High Performance Survey.

n = 23,339.
Source: CEB 2012 High Performance Survey.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

ROADmAP

Assess Your Personal


Communication Style

Diagnose Your
Key Stakeholders
Communication Style

Tailor Your
Communication
Style to Others

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

Communication Self-Perception Questionnaire


Directions
In the questionnaire below, each question consists of a pair of statements describing a behavior. From the pairs, choose which statement you think most
accurately represents how other people see you by placing an X in the unshaded box to the left.
Each statement implies a comparison, such as more than, less than, softer than, or louder than. In each case, think in terms of one-half the population,
(e.g.,louder than one-half the population).
1

More likely to lean back when stating opinions


More likely to be erect or lean forward when stating opinions

Less use of hands when talking


More use of hands when talking

Demonstrates less energy


Demonstrates more energy

More controlled body movement


More flowing body movement

Less forceful gestures


More forceful gestures

Less facial expressiveness


More facial expressiveness

Softer spoken
Louder voice

Appears more serious


Appears more fun loving
Total scores for statements 19 (i.e., the number of Xs in each column)
1

4
Overall score for statements 118

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

Communication Self-Perception Questionnaire


(Continued)
1

More likely to ask questions


More likely to make statements

10

Less inflection in voice


More inflection in voice

11

Less apt to exert pressure for action


More apt to exert pressure for action

12

Less apt to show feelings


More apt to show feelings

13

More tentative when expressing opinions


Less tentative when expressing opinions

14

More task-orientated conversations


More people-orientated conversations

15

Slower to resolve problem situations


Quicker to resolve problem situations

16

More orientated toward fact and logic


More orientated toward feelings and opinions

17

Slower paced
Faster paced

18

Less likely to use small talk or tell anecdotes


More likely to use small talk or tell anecdotes
Total scores for statements 1018 (i.e., the number of Xs in each column)
1

4
Overall score for statements 118

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

Assess Your Communication Style


Directions

Tally the four totals from your questionnaire.


For example: Column 1 = 3
Column 2 = 6

Column 3 = 1
Column 4 = 9
Make a mark on the appropriate axis to record the score for each column.
Join the marks together.
From the size and position of the resulting shape, you should be able to determine your preferred communication style.
Task

Column 3

9
8
7
6

Analytical

Driver

5
4
3
2

Ask

1
9

Column 1

Tell

Column 2

2
3
4

Amiable

Expressive

6
7
8

Column 4

Relationship
Source: Scott Chambers, Third-Generation Human Resources; CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

ASSESS YOUR COMMUNICATION STYLE


Wilson Learnings research and profiles of more than two million people around the world indicate that people fall into one of four social styles
(shown below) in terms of their behavioral comfort zones. Roughly 25% of the population falls into each group. In the typical communication
pattern, we make observations based on how we would react in certain situations and fail to take into account others communication style
preferences.
Task

Column 3

Directions

ANALYTIC

From the previous page, take the


two columns with the most number
of Xs. Find those columns on the
axes to the right to match yourself
to the proper quadrant. Circle the
box that reflects your style.

Process Focused
Let me think how it could work.

DRIVER

Results Focused
Lets take action on this.

At Your Worst
Critical
Indecisive
Old-Fashioned
Hard to Please
Moralistic
Unemotional

At Your Best
Efficient
Focused
Goal Oriented
Realistic
Independent
Determined

At Your Best
Candid
Strong Willed
Independent
Decisive
Practical
Efficient
Determined

4
3
2

At Your Worst
Harsh
Controlling
Shortsighted
Abrasive
Pushy
Power
Seeking

1
Ask

Column 1

AMIABLE

Tell

Column 2

Ideas Focused
Here are my ideas aboutthis.

At Your Best
Ambitious
Enthusiastic
Visionary
Fun Loving
Friendly
Influential

6
7
8
9

EXPRESSIVE

At Your Worst
Comforting
Needy
Unsure
Dependent
Awkward
Easily Manipulated

People Focused
Let me discuss this with my team.

At Your Best
Loyal
Supportive
Respectful
Dependable
Agreeable
Perceptive

At Your Worst
Overbearing
Unrealistic
Egotistical
Undisciplined
Manipulative
Hasty

Column 4

Relationship
Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

10

Stress Is the Best Indicator


If you are having trouble identifying with one particular quadrant, think about your actions when you are stressed. Do you avoid conflict, or do
you push toward resolution at the risk of making others uncomfortable? Do you acquiesce to others decisions for fear of rocking the boat?
Do you talk over people? Stress can bring out the best (and worst) of us. Note the shaded arrows in the diagram below. Where do you most
quickly move toward?

Relationship
Acquiesce

Attack

AMIABLE

EXPRESSIVE

Stress Response: Acquiesce


Complies with plans even
withunderlying disagreement or
uncertainty

Stress Response: Attack


Defends ideas aggressively and
maybecome judgmental and
personally criticize

Ask

Tell

ANALYTIC

DRIVER

Stress Response: Avoid


Indecisiveness turns to evasion,
both of people anddeadlines

Stress Response: Dictate


Attempts autocratic power; may
become pushy and intimidating

Avoid

Dictate

Task
Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

11

Finance analysts are most


likely to have an analytic
communication style
(i.e., relies on numbers,
data, and logic to convey
ideas; follows guidelines).

Many finance staff lack the


communication and business
partnership skills necessary
for communicating
actionable insight and
increasing their influence on
decision makers.

CURRENT Finance TEAM COMMUNICATION STYLEs


Typical Finance Team Communication Style Composition
Illustrative

Expressive Communication
Style

Visionary who sees the big


picture; creative thinker
Adept at and enjoys problem
solving, likes to experiment
and explore
Looks for overarching
themes and considers the
future

Driver Communication Style

Expressive

Driver

Assertive, active, and


decisive; thinks in terms of
the bottom line
Likes to determine course of
events and be in control of
professional relationship
Quick to act or decide;
expresses urgency for other
to take action
Enjoys challenges presented
by difficult situations and
people

Amiable

Analytic Communication Style

Communicates using
number and logic
Thorough in task situations;
moves carefully and follows
procedures and guidelines

Analytic

Amiable Communication Style

Understands how people


need to receive information
to act on it
Interaction and professional
relationships are primary
ways toget things done

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

12

ROADmAP

Assess Your Personal


Communication Style

Diagnose Your
Key Stakeholders
Communication Style

Tailor Your
Communication
Style to Others

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

13

Behavioral frameworks
provide understanding
of personal styles and
a path to diagnosing
others styles.

Get a Social Understanding


Description of Social Styles
Task
Analytic
Introspective, self-analytical, and critical thinker; uses data and
logic to make decisions
Understands what information is needed and weighs all sides
of an issue in decision making
Thorough in task situations; moves carefully and follows
procedures and guidelines

Style Taken into Excess


Can be bogged down by information, doing analysis at the
expense of moving forward; analysis paralysis.
May be seen as insensitive to others emotions, cold, or
resistant to change and entrenched in position.
Tendency toward remaining on the sidelines, watchfulness,
andobservation

Driver
Assertive, active, and decisive; thinks in terms of the
bottomline
Likes to determine course of events and be in control of
professional relationship
Quick to act or decide; expresses urgency for other to
takeaction
Enjoys challenges presented by difficult situations and people;
not stopped by hearing No
Style Taken into Excess
Can easily overlook process and comprehensive strategic
planning when driven by need to act and decide.
Can get defensive, argue, try to out-expert others, lose
patience, and push for decisions before its time.
Can be autocratic, has difficulty being a team member, not
heedful of others feelings, and may be perceived as cold.

Ask

Tell

Amiable
Understands how people need to receive information to act on
it; integrates others input in decisions
Interaction and professional relationships are primary ways to
get things done.
Supporting of peers and receptive to their ideas, team player,
feeling-based, trusts emotion and intuition

Style Taken into Excess


Can lose focus on goals when relationships or peoples needs
are compromised.
Has trouble saying no to requests and can over-compromise
to avoid conflict.
Immersed in the present, may lose track of time and not see
long term.

Expressive
Visionary who sees the big picture; generative and creative
thinker
Very idea oriented; focuses on future thought
Adept at and enjoys problem solving, likes to experiment
andexplore
Looks for overarching themes and makes decisions by
standing in the future
Style Taken into Excess
Can put too much emphasis on vision at the expense of action.
Can lose focus on tasks and have poor follow-through on
projects and attention to details.
Tend to be highly enthusiastic early on but lose interest in
projects that do not have a comprehensive visions.

Relationship
Source: Bonner curriculum; CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

14

Business executives fall


into four temperaments
based on their
communication style.

Discover who you are talking to


Critical Dimensions

Relationship

By understanding
and tailoring to
your counterparts
communication style,
Finance becomes more
persuasive.

Amiable

Expressive

Lets meet to discuss this.

Let me tell you my ideas about this.

Diplomatic, Loyal, Patient

Enthusiastic, Persuasive, Creative

Ask

Tell

Analytic

Driver

Let me think about this.

Lets take action on this.

Organized, Logical, Industrious

Candid, Strong Willed, Results Oriented

Task

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

15

IDENTIFY Others COMMUNICATION STYLES


Use the following tool to better understand the communication styles of your key stakeholders. Ask yourself about their key motivations,
interests, and decision patterns. To communicate more effectively with them, try to understand what they want to economize on.
Directions
Reread the descriptions of each communication style on the previous pages. Name one or two key stakeholders (e.g., coworkers, business partners, managers)
you are currently working with that match each communication style.

Communication Styles Diagnosing Tool

How to Diagnose

Amiable

Expressive

Analytic

Driver

Interest

Cooperation and security

Ideas and possibilities

Facts and data

Action and outcomes

What They Seek

Consensus

Recognition

Accuracy

Results

Decision Pattern

Slow and thoughtful

Fast and spontaneous

Slow and systematic

Decisive and results focused

What They
Wantto Save

Relationships

Effort

Face

Time

What They Have


Questions About

Why

Who

How

What

My Key
Stakeholders
withThis Style

_______________________

_______________________

_______________________

_______________________

_______________________

_______________________

_______________________

_______________________

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

16

Diagnosing Amiables
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Loyal
Cooperative
Supportive
Sensitive
Patient
Reliable

Primary Reaction to Stress: Acquiescing


Seeks: Consensus

At Best

Loyal
Supportive
Respectful
Dependable
Agreeable
Perceptive

At Worst

Conforming
Needy
Unsure
Dependent
Awkward
Easily Manipulated

Famous Amiables: Princess Diana, GeraldFord,


MaryTyler Moore

How to Identify Amiables


Verbal Clues

Nonverbal Clues

Speaks slowly

Slow to make decisions

Speaks softly

Moves slowly

Asks others for their opinions

People and team oriented

Tends to be quiet in group settings

Leans backward even when making a point

Offers compromises or synthesizes others ideas

More apt to remember personal information and details about others

Tentatively offers suggestions

Prefers one-on-one interactions or small group settings


Flexible about time
Relaxed posture
Responds to the feelings of others

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

17

Diagnosing Expressives
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Outgoing
Enthusiastic
Influential
Playful
Spontaneous
Ambitious
Primary Reaction to Stress: Attacking
Seeks: Recognition

At Best

Ambitious
Enthusiastic
Visionary
Fun Loving
Friendly
Influential

At Worst

Overbearing
Unrealistic
Egotistical
Undisciplined
Manipulative
Hasty

Famous Expressives: Muhammad Ali, BillClinton,


Madonna, Pablo Picasso, OprahWinfrey

How to Identify Expressives


Verbal Clues

Nonverbal Clues

Uses commands rather than questions

Uses motions and gestures

Speaks fast

Full of energy

Speaks loudly

Leans forward when trying to persuade

Tells jokes and stories

Willing to take risks

Wanders from the topic

Apt to make quick decisions

Tentatively offers suggestions

Dislikes monotony and routine

Shows a range of vocal inflection and tone

Less disciplined about time

Strongly expresses opinions

Makes eye contact

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

18

Diagnosing Analytics
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Analytical
Thorough
Serious
Methodical
Precise
Deliberate

Primary Reaction to Stress: Avoidance


Seeks: Accuracy

At Best

Logical
Thorough
Perfectionist
Disciplined
Deliberate
Organized

At Worst

Critical
Indecisive
Old-Fashioned
Hard to Please
Moralistic
Unemotional

Famous Analytics: Barack Obama, Albert


Einstein, Alan Greenspan, Woodrow Wilson

How to Identify Analytics


Verbal Clues

Nonverbal Clues

Speaks slowly

Leans backward when talking

Ask oriented even when giving directions

Likes to work alone

Careful in choosing words

Slow to make decisions

May stop mid-sentence, then begin a new sentence that


they believe makes more sense

Moves slowly

Qualifies ideas with facts and data


Little inflection in voice and tone
Not apt to tell stories
Fact and task oriented

Carefully researches and examines all opinions


Focused on details
Disciplined about time
Appears serious and detached from feelings
Responds to the feelings of others

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

19

Diagnosing Drivers
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Independent
Candid
Decisive
Practical
Efficient
Determined

At Best

Primary Reaction to Stress: Autocratic


Seeks: Results

Famous Drivers: Henry Ford, Barbara Walters,


Malcolm X, Charles Lindbergh, Teddy Roosevelt,
MikeWallace

Efficient
Focused
Goal Oriented
Realistic
Independent
Determined

At Worst

Harsh
Controlling
Shortsighted
Abrasive
Pushy
Power Seeking

How to Identify Drivers


Verbal Clues

Nonverbal Clues

Uses commands rather than questions

Moves quickly

Speaks fast

Leans forward when making a point

Speaks directly and succinctly

Very task oriented

Not apt to tell stories

Disciplined about time

Not very talkative

Often prefers working alone or directing others

Focuses on facts and data

Exerts pressure for decisions


Controls facial expressions
Uses direct eye contact

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

20

ROADmAP

Assess Your Personal


Communication Style

Diagnose Your
Key Stakeholders
Communication Style

Tailor Your
Communication
Style to Others

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

21

Understand the
characteristics of other
communication styles
to identify ways to alter
and use your style to fit
different situations.

Alter communication style to situations


Communication Styles Cheat Sheet
Driver

Expressive

Amiable

Analytical

Style when stressed:

Autocratic

Attacks

Acquiesce

Avoids

Measures personal
value by:

Results

Applause

Attention

Activity

Specialty:

Control

Social

Supportive

Technical

For growth,
needsto:

Listen

Check

Initiate

Decide

Wants to save:

Time

Effort

Relationships

Face

Needs climate that:

Allows to Build Own


Structure

Inspires to
TheirGoals

Suggests

Provides Details

Words used to
describe:

May be viewed as:

Direct
Assertive
Results Oriented
Independent
Decisive
Competitive
Pushy
Severe
Tough
Dominating
Harsh

Enthusiastic
Ambitious
Creative
Fast Paced
Optimistic
Confident
Manipulative
Excitable
Undisciplined
Reactionary
Egotistical

Diplomatic
Loyal
Supportive
Friendly
Considerate
Relaxed
Conforming
Unsure
Pliable
Dependent
Awkward

Organized
Thorough
Logical
Prudent
Accurate
Conscientious
Critical
Indecisive
Stuffy
Picky
Moralistic

When interacting with the style, you should:


Take the time to be:

Efficient

Stimulating

Agreeable

Accurate

Support their:

Conclusions and
Actions

Dreams and
Intuitions

Relationships and
Feelings

Principles and
Thinking

Persuade them by
telling/answering:

What

Who

Why

How

For decisions,
givethem:

Options and
Probabilities

Testimony and
Incentives

Guarantees and
Assurances

Evidence and Service

Source: Nokia; CEB analysis.


2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

22

If You Are an Amiable


Guidelines for Responding to Diverse Styles
Other Amiables

 erceive you as supportive, friendly, team oriented, helpful, thoughtful,


P
responsive, and open

To Work Better with Fellow Amiables


Be clear and directive. Recognize the need for defining

accountability and deadlines despite obstacles.

Analytics

 elate to your efficiency, logic, command of data, and task orientation


R
Question your haste and risk taking

To Work Better with Analytics


Stress the value of facts and data rather than emotions to build a case,
and encourage their input with a time limit.
Be systematic, detailed, and logical.
Provide added opportunities for their thoughts on unforeseen
implications.
Build confidence in the relationship through demonstrated technical
competence.

Expressives

 elate to your supportive, friendly, responsive, and helpful characteristics


R
Question your focus on consensus building

To Work Better with Expressives


Try to bring them definite opinions, backed by third-party
endorsement.
Publicly recognize and praise their accomplishments.
Stand your ground when challenged about rules and previously

established procedures.
Pick up the pace and address problems quickly.

Drivers

Relate to your supportive, helpful, team-oriented, and careful nature


Question your responsiveness

To Work Better with Drivers


Be concise and task focused.
Stay on schedule; stick to the agenda; provide factual summaries.
De-emphasize feelings.
Say what you think; make statements that are definite rather
than tentative.
Respond promptly to messages and requests.
Expect them to make quick decisions based on options
you provide.

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

23

If You Are an Expressive


Guidelines for Responding to Diverse Styles
Amiables

Relate to your warmth, enthusiasm, and stimulating and personable nature


Question your outgoing, loud, dramatic, and impulsive side

To Work Better with Amiables


Slow down the pace and volume; allow time to build a relationship.
Work on one item at a time in detail; avoid the confusion of too many

tasks or ideas at one time.
Ask questions, listen more, and talk less.
Do not come across too strong or assertive.
Encourage suggestions, participation in team activities,
and supportive roles.

Analytics

 elate to your imaginative, stimulating, and thought-provoking nature


R
Question your ability to perform as stated, your follow-through, and your
loud, flashy, and emotional side

To Work Better with Analytics


Talk about facts (not opinions or feelings), and break down
component parts, preferably in writing.
Slow your pace and avoid unnecessarily tight deadlines or rushed
decisions.
Ask questions, listen more, and talk less.
Be systematic, logical, and detailed in your approach.
Check to see whether the other party shares your energy on a topic.

Other Expressives

Relate to your warmth, enthusiasm, and stimulating and personable nature

To Work Better with Fellow Expressives


Provide structure for shared tasks. Keep on track and emphasize
the basics, allowing carefully limited experimentation as a reward
for results.

Drivers

Relate to your outgoing, imaginative, competitive, and personable aspects


Question your demonstrative, impulsive, and emotional side

To Work Better with Drivers


Back up your enthusiasm with actual results; demonstrate that your

ideas work.
De-emphasize feelings and emotional reactions.
Be prepared, be on time, and keep within agreed-on limits; provide

materials promptly.
Provide choices whenever possible, and let the drivers select
the choice.

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

24

If You Are an Analytic


Guidelines for Responding to Diverse Styles
Amiables

 elate to your cooperative nature, accuracy, and patience


R
Question your lack of interpersonal connections and dependence
on figures

To Work Better with Amiables


Show your interest in them as people rather than as workers.
Be supportive and empathetic.
Do not overdo facts and logic.
Use their skills as mediators to build relationships inside the
organization.
Provide them with structure and help them evaluate business risks
and implications.

Other Analytics


Relate
to your efficiency, logic, command of data, and task orientation
Question your haste and risk taking

To Work Better with Fellow Analytics


Establish timetables and make decisions. Reinforcing one anothers
desire for more information may form a self-perpetuating cycle that
does not produce results.

Expressives

Relate to your accomplishments, independence, and decisiveness


Question your lack of playfulness

To Work Better with Expressives


Spend informal time with them.
Recognize their need for connecting their name with their work.
Ask for their opinions and input on a noncritical, accepting basis.
Pick up the pace, avoid excessive detail, and address problems quickly.
Be patient with need for exploration and spontaneity.
Demonstrate energy and enthusiasm.

Drivers

Relate to your logic, command of data, accuracy, and dependability


Question your focus on details and analysis

To Work Better with Drivers


Summarize the facts and various outcomes; let them decide.
Pick up the pace, respond promptly, and be efficient.
Say what you think; make statements that are definite rather
than tentative.
Depend on self-discipline rather than on excessive reports
or precise instructions.

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

25

If You Are a Driver


Guidelines for Responding to Diverse Styles
Amiables

Relate to your efficiency and discipline


Question your lack of empathy, bottom-line orientation, and impatience

To Work Better with Amiables


Make personal contact; show concern for them and their families,

interests, etc.
Slow your pace and do not come across too strong.
Ask for advice on how to accomplish objectives in terms of motivating
others.
Support efforts and accomplishments with personal attention.

Analytics

 elate to your efficiency, logic, command of data, and task orientation


R
Question your haste and risk taking

To Work Better with Analytics


Bring them detailed facts and logic in writing.
Listen to their opinions, and show interest while they evaluate
and check the accuracy of the data.
Slow your pace and avoid unnecessarily tight deadlines or rushed
decisions.
Help them reach conclusions by encouraging them to set

deadlines after you have provided time for review.

Expressives

Relate to your accomplishments, independence, and decisiveness


Question your lack of playfulness

To Work Better with Expressives


Make personal contactbe more open about yourself, feelings,
and opinions.
Relax time constraints within structure; provide incentives.
Be patient with need for exploration and spontaneity.
Provide public recognition for accomplishments (i.e., give them credit
in front of others).

Other Drivers

Perceive you as action oriented, efficient, disciplined, logical, and decisive

To Work Better with Fellow Drivers


Agree in advance on specific goals, and provide freedom to work
within these limits. An unproductive deadlock can occur when there
is uncertainty about who is leading an effort.

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

26

Communication Styles Work Plan


Directions
Based on your score and the suggestions on the previous pages, write a list of changes to your style that will improve your communication with colleagues.

Name

Primary Concern:
Relationship or Task

Communicates Through:
Questions (Ask) or
Statements (Tell)

Communication Style

What I Will Change


About Our Interactions

Source: Robert Bolton and Dorothy Bolton, Social Style/Management Style (New York: AMACOM, 1984); CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

27

BUILD A COMMUNICATION ACTION PLAN FOR KEY STAKEHOLDERS


Continued improvement in understanding and adapting your personal communication style will depend on using the framework and
techniques on the prior pages and creating a more formal action plan for key stakeholders.

Directions

Complete the grid below for one or two people that you know or work with.
Refer to the guidelines on the previous pages on how to appeal to different communication styles.

Name

Determine Their Communication Style

What I Will Change About Our Interactions

Relationship


Ask

Tell


Task
Relationship


Ask

Tell


Task

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

28

Goal: To practice flexing


your behavioral style.

Flexing to other behavioral styles

Instructions:
Split into pairs and
tell your partner your
behavioral style.
Individually, think about
a current project you are
working on, or will work
on, where you need to
secure a stakeholders
buy-in.
Your partner will play the
role of your stakeholder,
and you will present your
project or idea to your
partner to gain support.
Before you begin, think
about the questions he
or she may ask and what
strategies you will employ
to appeal to his or her
behavioral style.

Partners Behavioral Style:

Expressive

Driver

Analytics

Amiable

What
Questions
Might Your
Partner Ask?

Have you looked


at other, more
innovative
solutions?

How long will


this take to
implement?

Have you looked


at what would
happen if we did
not implement
this?

What groups
would be
affected by this
change?

What
Strategies
Could You
Employ?

Consult with
expressive
members in
advance to
obtain ideas
for possible
solutions.

Provide driver
members with
options that they
can choose from.

Use rational
persuasion
through data
analysis.

Show amiable
members that
you have
stopped the idea
to different
constituencies.

Source: CEB analysis.

Briefly describe the


project or idea to your
partner and then have
a conversation to gain
buy-in.
When directed by the
facilitator, switch roles.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

29

Sample Stakeholder Action Plan


Directions
Before your presentation, collect information about your stakeholders to identify the action steps you can take to gain or increase support of your proposal.

Stakeholder
name and
role in
proposala

Justine Carver

Behavioral
style

Who or what
are they
influenced
by?

How does your


proposal support
achievement
of stakeholder
objectives?

Expressive

Pierre Gagnon,

VP of Sales (D)

Supports goal of

her Chief of

reducing turnover

Staff

costs (provides an
select out of the hiring

competitors
doing

opportunity to self-

Our
what they are

How does
your proposal
threaten
achievement
of stakeholder
objectives?

process)

Improves brand
of position in

Likes out-of-

marketplace (reduces

the-box ideas

Immediate
impact of longer
time to fill for
open positions
(promised the
department
would be fully
staffed through
end of year)
Increases SG&A

Level
of
power
(H, M,
L)

Level of
support for
proposal
(H, M, L)

What will he or she


need to see to increase
level of support?

our competitors or best-

Could go

in-class companies

either way;
no trends

That it has worked for

What else do
I need to do?

in previous

information from team.

immediate costs

will impact budget.

Create a visually
appealing map of new

That this does not

process.

overcomplicate the
hiring process

Talk to her COS to


understand how costs

How the long-term


benefits outweigh

decisions

Obtain best practice

disgruntled alumni)

Set up a conference call


with her in advance
of meeting to obtain
initial perspective.

Eric Johnson,

Analytic

VP of
Recruiting
(D)

Kim Nguyen,

CHRO
Our
competitors
what they are
doing

Supports goal of

reducing turnover
within first 90 days

Supports goal of
innovating current
recruiting processes

Increases
additional
process steps for
recruiting staff
Reduces time-tofill metrics for
position

A process map

comparing current

Initially

Create a visually
appealing map of new

identified

versus future state to

this idea

ensure capture of all

through

details

Recruiting to obtain

Specific predicted

recruiting data and cost

discussion

with Eric

process versus old process.

information.

impact of process on
cost-per-hire and time-

to-fill metrics

Provide root-cause
analysis in detail to Eric
in advance of meeting.

Proof that this proposal


is addressing the true

Speak with JS in

Ask Eric to talk to Justin

cause of high new-hire

in advance of the

turnover

presentation.

Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

30

How often you


communicate a message
will depend on both
your audience and
the message being
communicated.

DETERMINE THE FREQUENCY OF COMMUNICATION


Audience: No one approach fits
all audiences. You must tailor
communications to each individual.
They may require regular updates or
just want to be notified when an issue
arises.

Message: The kind of message or


activity being communicated
(e.g., its level of urgency, importance,
sensitivity) will affect how and how
often you communicate.

No one type of communication will


suit the same person all the time.

Its important to ensure relevant parties receive all the information they need in a timely manner without experiencing
communication fatigue. Track your communications, particularly where problems and issues exist. Remain informed and
supportive and, when possible, assist with problem resolution.
Consider:
Person ALikes to be given regular
updates about all issues within his
department and the progress of each

Person BLikes to know the issue is


resolved but to be told when any major
barriers arise during the process

Think about someone you work with closely. How often do they prefer to communicate? Do they
like regular e-mails about everything? A concise summary? Only under certain circumstances? If
you told them about a major issue, how would you follow up?
Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

31

You can communicate


with people both
professionally and
personally in an everincreasing number of
ways, and selecting
the right method can
be crucial. The most
appropriate method will
depend on who you are
communicating with and
the message involved.

DETERMINE THE BEST COMMUNICATION METHODS


Have you ever used the wrong communication method?

Considering the scenarios below, what is an appropriate communication method to use? Are there
any that would never be appropriate? Put a check mark next to the best methods and an X next to
the inappropriate methods.

Work E-Mail

Phone Call

Group
Presentation

Formal
Meeting

Informal
Meeting

Social Media

Concern about
a colleagues
performance
Sharing details of
the departments
financial results
Planning dinner
with your college
friend
Asking for a pay
rise
Discussing
an interview
candidate

Tip: Remember that


although e-mail shouldnt
always be the go-to
communication method, it helps
you keep a paper trail and follow
up on next steps and actions.

Passing on details
for a training
session
Source: CEB analysis.

2014 CEB. All rights reserved.FLC9213014SYN

32

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen