Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This workbook provides frameworks and techniques in several dimensions of communication and listening.
This workbook is not designed to be a comprehensive solution for all development opportunities; rather, it focuses on
a few discrete areas where finance employees tend to struggle.
This workbook is designed to be interactive. We recommend you carve out time to work on a specific section by
yourself or as a team.
Goals
This workbook is designed to help you build your communication and listening skills, which will enhance your ability to:
Adapt your communication style for various audiences to ensure your message is understood,
For more information on how we can help you communicate more effectively with stakeholders, please contact
Eisha Tierney Armstrong at tierneye@executiveboard.com.
Relationship
Ask
Tell
Task
Percentage of Employees
Percentage of Employees
5%
Decreased
6%
Decreased
57%
Increased
18%
Stayed
the Same
38%
Stayed the
Same
76%
Increased
n = 23,339.
n = 23,339.
67%
70%
66%
63%
57%
Percentage of Employees
9%
Decreased
35%
0%
41%
Stayed the
Same
People on
Different
Teams
People at
Different
Job Levels
People in
Different
Locations
People
Outside
of My
Department
or Function
50%
Increased
n = 23,339.
Source: CEB 2012 High Performance Survey.
n = 23,339.
Source: CEB 2012 High Performance Survey.
ROADmAP
Diagnose Your
Key Stakeholders
Communication Style
Tailor Your
Communication
Style to Others
Softer spoken
Louder voice
4
Overall score for statements 118
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Slower paced
Faster paced
18
4
Overall score for statements 118
Column 3
9
8
7
6
Analytical
Driver
5
4
3
2
Ask
1
9
Column 1
Tell
Column 2
2
3
4
Amiable
Expressive
6
7
8
Column 4
Relationship
Source: Scott Chambers, Third-Generation Human Resources; CEB analysis.
Column 3
Directions
ANALYTIC
Process Focused
Let me think how it could work.
DRIVER
Results Focused
Lets take action on this.
At Your Worst
Critical
Indecisive
Old-Fashioned
Hard to Please
Moralistic
Unemotional
At Your Best
Efficient
Focused
Goal Oriented
Realistic
Independent
Determined
At Your Best
Candid
Strong Willed
Independent
Decisive
Practical
Efficient
Determined
4
3
2
At Your Worst
Harsh
Controlling
Shortsighted
Abrasive
Pushy
Power
Seeking
1
Ask
Column 1
AMIABLE
Tell
Column 2
Ideas Focused
Here are my ideas aboutthis.
At Your Best
Ambitious
Enthusiastic
Visionary
Fun Loving
Friendly
Influential
6
7
8
9
EXPRESSIVE
At Your Worst
Comforting
Needy
Unsure
Dependent
Awkward
Easily Manipulated
People Focused
Let me discuss this with my team.
At Your Best
Loyal
Supportive
Respectful
Dependable
Agreeable
Perceptive
At Your Worst
Overbearing
Unrealistic
Egotistical
Undisciplined
Manipulative
Hasty
Column 4
Relationship
Source: CEB analysis.
10
Relationship
Acquiesce
Attack
AMIABLE
EXPRESSIVE
Ask
Tell
ANALYTIC
DRIVER
Avoid
Dictate
Task
Source: CEB analysis.
11
Expressive Communication
Style
Expressive
Driver
Amiable
Communicates using
number and logic
Thorough in task situations;
moves carefully and follows
procedures and guidelines
Analytic
12
ROADmAP
Diagnose Your
Key Stakeholders
Communication Style
Tailor Your
Communication
Style to Others
13
Behavioral frameworks
provide understanding
of personal styles and
a path to diagnosing
others styles.
Driver
Assertive, active, and decisive; thinks in terms of the
bottomline
Likes to determine course of events and be in control of
professional relationship
Quick to act or decide; expresses urgency for other to
takeaction
Enjoys challenges presented by difficult situations and people;
not stopped by hearing No
Style Taken into Excess
Can easily overlook process and comprehensive strategic
planning when driven by need to act and decide.
Can get defensive, argue, try to out-expert others, lose
patience, and push for decisions before its time.
Can be autocratic, has difficulty being a team member, not
heedful of others feelings, and may be perceived as cold.
Ask
Tell
Amiable
Understands how people need to receive information to act on
it; integrates others input in decisions
Interaction and professional relationships are primary ways to
get things done.
Supporting of peers and receptive to their ideas, team player,
feeling-based, trusts emotion and intuition
Expressive
Visionary who sees the big picture; generative and creative
thinker
Very idea oriented; focuses on future thought
Adept at and enjoys problem solving, likes to experiment
andexplore
Looks for overarching themes and makes decisions by
standing in the future
Style Taken into Excess
Can put too much emphasis on vision at the expense of action.
Can lose focus on tasks and have poor follow-through on
projects and attention to details.
Tend to be highly enthusiastic early on but lose interest in
projects that do not have a comprehensive visions.
Relationship
Source: Bonner curriculum; CEB analysis.
14
Relationship
By understanding
and tailoring to
your counterparts
communication style,
Finance becomes more
persuasive.
Amiable
Expressive
Ask
Tell
Analytic
Driver
Task
15
How to Diagnose
Amiable
Expressive
Analytic
Driver
Interest
Consensus
Recognition
Accuracy
Results
Decision Pattern
What They
Wantto Save
Relationships
Effort
Face
Time
Why
Who
How
What
My Key
Stakeholders
withThis Style
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________
16
Diagnosing Amiables
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Loyal
Cooperative
Supportive
Sensitive
Patient
Reliable
At Best
Loyal
Supportive
Respectful
Dependable
Agreeable
Perceptive
At Worst
Conforming
Needy
Unsure
Dependent
Awkward
Easily Manipulated
Nonverbal Clues
Speaks slowly
Speaks softly
Moves slowly
17
Diagnosing Expressives
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Outgoing
Enthusiastic
Influential
Playful
Spontaneous
Ambitious
Primary Reaction to Stress: Attacking
Seeks: Recognition
At Best
Ambitious
Enthusiastic
Visionary
Fun Loving
Friendly
Influential
At Worst
Overbearing
Unrealistic
Egotistical
Undisciplined
Manipulative
Hasty
Nonverbal Clues
Speaks fast
Full of energy
Speaks loudly
18
Diagnosing Analytics
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Analytical
Thorough
Serious
Methodical
Precise
Deliberate
At Best
Logical
Thorough
Perfectionist
Disciplined
Deliberate
Organized
At Worst
Critical
Indecisive
Old-Fashioned
Hard to Please
Moralistic
Unemotional
Nonverbal Clues
Speaks slowly
Moves slowly
19
Diagnosing Drivers
Communication Style Overview
Key Characteristics
Independent
Candid
Decisive
Practical
Efficient
Determined
At Best
Efficient
Focused
Goal Oriented
Realistic
Independent
Determined
At Worst
Harsh
Controlling
Shortsighted
Abrasive
Pushy
Power Seeking
Nonverbal Clues
Moves quickly
Speaks fast
20
ROADmAP
Diagnose Your
Key Stakeholders
Communication Style
Tailor Your
Communication
Style to Others
21
Understand the
characteristics of other
communication styles
to identify ways to alter
and use your style to fit
different situations.
Expressive
Amiable
Analytical
Autocratic
Attacks
Acquiesce
Avoids
Measures personal
value by:
Results
Applause
Attention
Activity
Specialty:
Control
Social
Supportive
Technical
For growth,
needsto:
Listen
Check
Initiate
Decide
Wants to save:
Time
Effort
Relationships
Face
Inspires to
TheirGoals
Suggests
Provides Details
Words used to
describe:
Direct
Assertive
Results Oriented
Independent
Decisive
Competitive
Pushy
Severe
Tough
Dominating
Harsh
Enthusiastic
Ambitious
Creative
Fast Paced
Optimistic
Confident
Manipulative
Excitable
Undisciplined
Reactionary
Egotistical
Diplomatic
Loyal
Supportive
Friendly
Considerate
Relaxed
Conforming
Unsure
Pliable
Dependent
Awkward
Organized
Thorough
Logical
Prudent
Accurate
Conscientious
Critical
Indecisive
Stuffy
Picky
Moralistic
Efficient
Stimulating
Agreeable
Accurate
Support their:
Conclusions and
Actions
Dreams and
Intuitions
Relationships and
Feelings
Principles and
Thinking
Persuade them by
telling/answering:
What
Who
Why
How
For decisions,
givethem:
Options and
Probabilities
Testimony and
Incentives
Guarantees and
Assurances
22
Analytics
Expressives
Drivers
23
Analytics
Other Expressives
Drivers
24
Other Analytics
Relate
to your efficiency, logic, command of data, and task orientation
Question your haste and risk taking
Expressives
Drivers
25
Analytics
Expressives
Other Drivers
26
Name
Primary Concern:
Relationship or Task
Communicates Through:
Questions (Ask) or
Statements (Tell)
Communication Style
Source: Robert Bolton and Dorothy Bolton, Social Style/Management Style (New York: AMACOM, 1984); CEB analysis.
27
Directions
Complete the grid below for one or two people that you know or work with.
Refer to the guidelines on the previous pages on how to appeal to different communication styles.
Name
Relationship
Ask
Tell
Task
Relationship
Ask
Tell
Task
28
Instructions:
Split into pairs and
tell your partner your
behavioral style.
Individually, think about
a current project you are
working on, or will work
on, where you need to
secure a stakeholders
buy-in.
Your partner will play the
role of your stakeholder,
and you will present your
project or idea to your
partner to gain support.
Before you begin, think
about the questions he
or she may ask and what
strategies you will employ
to appeal to his or her
behavioral style.
Expressive
Driver
Analytics
Amiable
What
Questions
Might Your
Partner Ask?
What groups
would be
affected by this
change?
What
Strategies
Could You
Employ?
Consult with
expressive
members in
advance to
obtain ideas
for possible
solutions.
Provide driver
members with
options that they
can choose from.
Use rational
persuasion
through data
analysis.
Show amiable
members that
you have
stopped the idea
to different
constituencies.
29
Stakeholder
name and
role in
proposala
Justine Carver
Behavioral
style
Who or what
are they
influenced
by?
Expressive
Pierre Gagnon,
VP of Sales (D)
Supports goal of
her Chief of
reducing turnover
Staff
costs (provides an
select out of the hiring
competitors
doing
opportunity to self-
Our
what they are
How does
your proposal
threaten
achievement
of stakeholder
objectives?
process)
Improves brand
of position in
Likes out-of-
marketplace (reduces
the-box ideas
Immediate
impact of longer
time to fill for
open positions
(promised the
department
would be fully
staffed through
end of year)
Increases SG&A
Level
of
power
(H, M,
L)
Level of
support for
proposal
(H, M, L)
Could go
in-class companies
either way;
no trends
What else do
I need to do?
in previous
immediate costs
Create a visually
appealing map of new
process.
overcomplicate the
hiring process
decisions
disgruntled alumni)
Eric Johnson,
Analytic
VP of
Recruiting
(D)
Kim Nguyen,
CHRO
Our
competitors
what they are
doing
Supports goal of
reducing turnover
within first 90 days
Supports goal of
innovating current
recruiting processes
Increases
additional
process steps for
recruiting staff
Reduces time-tofill metrics for
position
A process map
comparing current
Initially
Create a visually
appealing map of new
identified
this idea
through
details
Recruiting to obtain
Specific predicted
discussion
with Eric
information.
impact of process on
cost-per-hire and time-
to-fill metrics
Provide root-cause
analysis in detail to Eric
in advance of meeting.
Speak with JS in
in advance of the
turnover
presentation.
30
Its important to ensure relevant parties receive all the information they need in a timely manner without experiencing
communication fatigue. Track your communications, particularly where problems and issues exist. Remain informed and
supportive and, when possible, assist with problem resolution.
Consider:
Person ALikes to be given regular
updates about all issues within his
department and the progress of each
Think about someone you work with closely. How often do they prefer to communicate? Do they
like regular e-mails about everything? A concise summary? Only under certain circumstances? If
you told them about a major issue, how would you follow up?
Source: CEB analysis.
31
Considering the scenarios below, what is an appropriate communication method to use? Are there
any that would never be appropriate? Put a check mark next to the best methods and an X next to
the inappropriate methods.
Work E-Mail
Phone Call
Group
Presentation
Formal
Meeting
Informal
Meeting
Social Media
Concern about
a colleagues
performance
Sharing details of
the departments
financial results
Planning dinner
with your college
friend
Asking for a pay
rise
Discussing
an interview
candidate
Passing on details
for a training
session
Source: CEB analysis.
32