Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230290329
CITATIONS
READS
686
2 authors:
Canan Uraz
Sheyda Atalay
Ege University
Ege University
6 PUBLICATIONS 5 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
1708
Canan Uraz1
Sheyda Atalay1
1
Research Article
Introduction
http://www.cet-journal.com
1709
21.44
54.34
newly developed supported VPO catalysts did not
P2O5
0.92
6.25
6.25
1.2
6.25
1.92
92.83
6.25
4.625
time and benzene/air mol ratio on the oxidation of
KNO3
4.772
benzene in a laboratory scale fluidized bed reactor.
http://www.cet-journal.com
1710
C. Uraz et al.
parts water; and third, 0.71 parts nickel nitrate in 2.27 parts
H2O. These three solutions are then added to the hydrochloric
solution, and the mixed solution is stirred. 100 g of aluminum
oxide is added to this solution as support. The coating operation is carried out by slow evaporation with continuous stirring of the solution. Finally, the catalyst is calcined at approximately 400 C for 4 hours in a furnace.
2.1.3 Catalyst 3
Zr(OH)4 is impregnated with molybdic acid (H2MoO4) dissolved in 3.56 mL of ammonium hydroxide (25 %) and
26.7 mL of water followed by evaporating the water at room
temperature, drying and calcining in air. The formulation and
preparation technique of superacidic catalyst are proposed by
K. Arata [20].
2.1.4 Catalyst 4
V2O5/TiO2 catalyst is prepared by impregnation of TiO2 with
a NH4VO3 solution according to the method described by Satsuma et al. [8]. NH4VO3 is dissolved in oxalic acid solution.
After addition of TiO2, the solution is evaporated with stirring
until it becomes a pasty cake or a powder. The solid thus
obtained is dried at 110 C and calcined at 500 C for 7 h.
2.1.5 Catalyst 5
Catalyst 5 is prepared like Catalyst 1. The carrier is same as the
first catalyst but the active ingredients are different. A molar
ratio between V2O5, and MoO3 in 2.72 g silica gel is treated
with 200 mL HCl, 40 mL HNO3 and 360 mL H2O in a porcelain basin.
Solution A: 15 g V2O5 is slurried with 150 mL water and
kept at around 80 C by heating on a hot plate. Powdered oxalic acid (41.82 g) is added to the slurry in a small quantity with
stirring until the V2O5 is completely dissolved, giving a deep
blue solution. Solution B: 7.28 g of ammonia molybdate is
dissolved in 72 mL of hot water. Solution C: 6.153 g of nickel
nitrate is dissolved in water. Solution D: 4.793 g of sodium
borate is dissolved in water. Solution E: 20.35 g sodium phosphate is dissolved in water. Solutions A, B, C, D and E are
mixed together and poured on to the silica gel previously prepared. The mixture is kept heated on a sand bath at around
100 C with frequent stirring. When the mixture dries to a
fairly loose powder, it is transferred to an air oven maintained
at 105110 C and heated until it becomes a fairly free flowing
powder (usually 57 h). Lastly, the impregnated silica gel is
transferred into a muffle furnace. The temperature is gradually
raised to 500 C in around 5 h and maintained at this level for
2 h.
2.1.6 Catalyst 6
Keggin-type polyoxometalate catalyst is prepared based on the
study by Etienne et al. [9]. It is prepared by dissolving MoO3,
H3PO4, KNO3 in water to obtain an equiatomic ratio between
K and P, and a ratio between Mo and P equal to 12. This mixture is put into an Erlenmeyer flask. For samples containing
vanadia, the desired amount of V2O5 is dissolved in the solution before addition of nitric acid. Samples containing an
amount of vanadia between 0 and 1.5 atoms for each Keggin
formula, PMo12O40 can be prepared. For this catalyst, the V/P
ratio is selected as 0.5. HNO3 is then added to this mixture to
reach a pH lower than 1.0. A magnetic stirrer is used for this
purpose. When the pH value is equal to 0.97 and no change is
obtained, stirring is stopped. The sample obtained at the end
is filtered. Then it is dried at 100 C for 8 h, and calcined at
120 C for 12 h, at 140 C for 12 h and at 180 C for 12 h. The
final temperature of calcination (350 C) is reached in 6 h, and
maintained for 6 h. After all the catalysts are prepared, sieve
analysis is performed in order to achieve a uniform size distribution of 150 lm.
2.2
Apparatus
http://www.cet-journal.com
2.2.3 Reactor
A fluidized bed reactor with a 25.4 mm (1) inside diameter
and 420 mm length is used for the reaction (see Fig. 2). It was
made of AISI-316 SS. The catalyst is placed into the reactor
and two 300 mesh sieves are placed at the bottom and at the
exit of the reactor to support and to prevent the escape of the
powder catalyst. An electrical heater wound around the reactor
is used for heating. Glass wool is used insulating the reactor.
The reaction temperature is controlled through a PID temperature controller connected to an iron-constantan type ColePalmer probe thermocouple. The powers of the heaters and
geometrical parameters of the reactor are listed in Tab. 2.
1711
AISI 316 SS
250 W
300 W
HR
420 mm
DR
25.4 mm
hR
355 mm
Volume of reactor
206 cm3
150 lm
56 30 15 mm
2.2.4 Cooler
A cooler is placed to cool the hot gas mixture leaving the reactor. The gas contains MAN, unreacted benzene, by-products
and excess air. The cooler is a shell and tube type apparatus
and contains 14 tubes of 8 mm diameter and 500 mm length.
Tap water is circulated through the shell side of the cooler.
2.3
Experimental Procedure
http://www.cet-journal.com
1712
C. Uraz et al.
Range
325400
1
1394
0.01090.0477
2.4617.83
Total Selectivity
x1
xT
(5)
http://www.cet-journal.com
1713
BET
LANGMUIR
Catalyst 4
Catalyst 6
Fresh
Exper.
Fresh
Exper.
A (m /g)
6.283
2.049
124.8
117.9
Vm (cm /g)
1.444
0.980
28.69
27.10
A (m /g)
9.122
2.783
175.9
165.3
Vm (cm3/g)
2.099
0.997
40.45
37.99
http://www.cet-journal.com
1714
C. Uraz et al.
http://www.cet-journal.com
MAN could be obtained. Pore size distribution of the experienced and the fresh catalysts are shown in Figs. 12 and 13. It is
seen from Figs. 12 and 13 that pore size distribution of both
catalysts are almost same. It is also easily seen from Tab. 4 that
adsorption volume of experienced catalyst is almost the same
as the fresh catalyst.
When the comparison of all catalysts is made, it can be said
that Catalyst 1 had higher performance than the other catalysts. In the experiments carried out over Catalyst 1, the highest MAN conversions were obtained. It can be concluded that
Catalyst 1 is a more suitable catalyst for benzene oxidation to
MAN in a fluidized bed reactor. The results also indicate that:
V2O5 and MoO3 are essential active components.
SiO2 as a support is more suitable than Al2O3 and titanium
oxide.
Symbols used
[m2/g]
[]
DD
[mm]
DR
[mm]
DGD
[mm]
F
[mol/s]
FB0
[mol/s]
G.C.
[]
hR
[mm]
HD
[mm]
HR
[mm]
MAN
[]
M, m, wt [g]
MW
[g/mol]
n
[mol]
P
[atm]
q
[g/mL]
S.S.
[]
t
[s]
T
[C]
TC
[]
W
[g]
W/FAO
[g s mol1]
A
C
surface area
constant
diameter of the gas distributor cap
inside diameter of the reactor
inside diameter of the gas distributor
flow rate
flow rate of benzene
gas chromatography
length of the reactor
length of the gas distributor
length of the reactor
maleic anhydride
mass
molecular mass
mole number
pressure
density
stainless steel
time
temperature
temperature controller
mass of catalyst
space-time
V
Vm
X
[mL]
[cm3/g]
[%]
1715
volume
volume of catalyst
conversion
References
[1] Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chemical Process and Design
Vol.14, Marcel Dekker, New York 1977.
[2] http://www.vanadium.com.au/ScienceStuff/Chemistry/
MaleicAnhydride.htm.
[3] K. Lohbeck, H. Hafercorn, W. Fuhrmann, Ullmanns Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry Vol. A16, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 1992.
[4] H. R. Hakimelahi, R. Sotudh-Gharebagh, N. Mostoufi, Int.
J. Chem. Reactor Eng. 2006, 4, A23.
[5] J. Werther, Ger. Chem. Eng. 1983, 6, 228.
[6] G. C. Bond, P. Forzatti, J. C. Vedrine, Cat. Today 2000, 56 (4),
329.
[7] http://www.cm.utexas.edu/academic/courses/Fall1998/
CH38/AlkaneCatalysis.htm
[8] A. Satsuma, S. Takenaka, T. Tanaka, App Cat., A 2002,
232 (12), 93.
[9] E. Etienne et al., App. Cat., A 2003, 256, 275.
[10] N. K. Kala Raj, V. G. Puranik, C. Gopinathan, A. V. Ramaswamy, App. Cat., A 2003, 256, 265.
[11] F. C. Jentoft et al., App. Cat., A 2003, 256, 291.
[12] J. C. Dillon, J. H. Holles, M. E. Davis, J. A. Labinger, Cat. Today 2003, 81 (2), 189.
[13] M. E. Davis, C. J. Dillon, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41 (5),
858.
[14] A. S. C. Brown, J. S. J. Hargraves, S. H. Taylor, Cat. Today
2000, 59, 403.
[15] G. D. Suciu, G. Stefani, C. Fumagalli, UK Patent 2145010A,
1985.
[16] H. Taheri, US Patent 5 011 945, 1991.
[17] R. A. Overbeek, Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University 1994.
[18] R. Marg, India Patent 129962, 1971.
[19] A. Di Cio, A. Vitali, European Patent 0 037 020 B1, 1981.
[20] K. Arata, App Cat., A 1996, 1, 146.
[21] http://www.refiningonline.com/EngelhardKB/crep/
TCR1_2.htm.
http://www.cet-journal.com