vs. SIMEON BARRANCO, JR., respondent. Facts: Simeon Barranco, petitioner, was a bar exam passer. However, before he could take his oath, Patricia Figueroa, respondent, petitioned that respondent be denied admission. Her complaint was that respondent and she had been sweethearts, a child of them was born out of wedlock, and that respondent did not fulfill his repeated promises to marry. Furthermore, respondent married and settled with another woman. Complainant further claimed that respondent forced complainant into sexual relations with him. Issue: Are the charges set against the respondent enough to disbar him from taking the lawyers oath? Ruling: No, the charges required to constitute a disbarment not only be immoral, but grossly immoral. In the case at hand, the allegation on respondent merely suggest a doubtful moral character. Furthermore, complainant continued to see respondent for a while, even after giving birth to the child, thus suggesting that the sexual relations were consensual and not forced.