Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com
Construction
and Building
MATERIALS
www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat
Abstract
Self compacting concrete (SCC) is a development of conventional concrete, in which the use of vibrator for compaction is no more
required. This property of self compacting concrete has made its use more attractive all over the world. But its initial higher supply cost
over conventional concrete, has hindered its application to general construction. Therefore, for producing low cost SCC, it is prudent to
look at the alternates to help reducing the SSC cost. This research is aimed at evaluating the usage of bagasse ash as viscosity modifying
agent in SCC, and to study the relative costs of the materials used in SCC.
In this research, the main variables are the proportion of bagasse ash, dosage of superplasticizer for owability and water/binder
ratio. The parameters kept constant are the amount of cement and water content.
Test results substantiate the feasibility to develop low cost self compacting concrete using bagasse ash. In the fresh state of concrete, the dierent mixes of concrete have slump ow in the range of 333 mm to 815 mm, L-box ratio ranging from 0 to 1 and ow
time ranging from 1.8 s to no ow (stucked). Out of twenty ve dierent mixes, ve mixes were found to satisfy the requirements
suggested by European federation of national trade associations representing producers and applicators of specialist building products (EFNARC) guide for making self compacting concrete. The compressive strengths developed by the self compacting concrete
mixes with bagasse ash at 28 days were comparable to the control concrete. Cost analysis showed that the cost of ingredients
of specic self compacting concrete mix is 35.63% less than that of control concrete, both having compressive strength above
34 MPa.
2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Self compacting concrete; Sugarcane; Bagasse; Bagasse ash; Compressive strength
1. Introduction
A self compacting concrete (SCC) is dened as a concrete that has excellent deformability and high resistance
to segregation and can be lled in heavily reinforced or
restricted area without applying vibration. SCC was developed in Japan [1] in the late 1980s, and recently, this concrete has gained wide use in many countries for dierent
applications and structural congurations [26].
Several dierent approaches have been used to develop
SCC. One method to achieve self-consolidating property
is to incorporate a viscosity modifying admixture (VMA)
Corresponding author. Tel.: +92 923 200123; fax: +92 923 631594.
E-mail address: shazim_memon@yahoo.com (S.A. Memon).
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.02.012
to enhance stability [79]. The use of VMA along with adequate concentration of superplasticizer (SP) can ensure
high deformability and adequate workability, leading to a
good resistance to segregation. However, viscosity modifying admixtures are very expensive and can increase the cost
of concrete.
One alternative approach to achieve self-consolidating
property is to increase signicantly the amount of ne
materials such as bagasse ash without increasing the
cost.
This paper presents the results of research aimed to
investigate the suitability of bagasse ash as a viscosity modifying agent in SCC. The utilization of bagasse ash in SCC
mix produced desired results, reduced cost, and also provided an environment friendly disposal of agro-industry
waste product.
704
residual ash [12]. Therefore, Pakistan consumes approximately 42 million tons of sugarcane in the sugar manufacturing industry, and produces approximately 11 million
tons of bagasse, with a capacity of generating over 0.26
million tons of bagasse ash.
2.2. Cogeneration of electricity using bagasse
World Alliance for decentralized energy [13] highlighted
abundant opportunity for the wider use of bagasse-based
cogeneration in sugarcane producing countries. Yet this
potential remains largely unexploited in the worlds main
cane producing countries: Brazil, India, Thailand, Paki-
Table 1
Sugarcane yield in Pakistan during last ve years
Year
Province
Mills No.
Cane production
Million tons
Cane crushed
Million tons
Sugar production
Million tons
Recovery percentage
19992000
Punjab
Sind
NWFP
Balochistan
Total
37
25
5
0
67
25.00
12.10
4.90
0.04
42.04
16.83
10.86
1.30
0.00
28.99
1.316
0.996
0.103
0
2.415
7.8
9.2
7.9
Punjab
Sind
NWFP
Balochistan
Total
35
25
5
0
65
26.74
12.05
4.80
0.03
43.62
18.07
10.49
0.85
0.00
29.41
1.437
0.968
0.061
0
2.466
8.1
20012002
Punjab
Sind
NWFP
Balochistan
Total
37
27
5
0
69
31.80
11.42
4.79
0.04
48.05
25.25
10.16
1.29
0.00
36.07
2.152
0.941
0.105
0
3.198
8.5
9.3
8.1
0
8.6
20022003
Punjab
Sind
NWFP
Balochistan
Total
38
28
5
0
71
33.17
13.80
5.05
0.03
52.05
27.58
12.42
1.79
0.00
41.79
2.351
1.159
0.145
0
3.655
8.5
9.3
8.1
0
8.7
20032004
Punjab
Sind
NWFP
Balochistan
Total
38
28
5
0
71
34.42
14.61
4.75
0.04
53.82
28.60
12.99
2.07
0.00
43.66
2.599
1.221
0.176
0
3.996
9.1
9.4
8.5
0
9.5
20002001
8.3
8
9.2
7.2
Table 2
Global bagasse cogeneration market potential
Countries
Sugarcane production
(Million tons/year)
Potential for
electricity (GWh)
Present national
electricity demand
(TWh)
Bagasse cogeneration
potential as percentage
of electricity demand
Brazil
India
Thailand
Pakistan
Mexico
Colombia
Cuba
Philippines
366.32
290.00
74.07
52.05
45.12
38.80
34.70
25.83
28.60
21.48
5.49
3.88
3.34
2.71
2.57
1.91
38.62
29.00
7.47
5.20
4.51
3.88
3.47
2.58
335.90
497.20
90.91
62.27
186.70
39.81
13.38
42.04
11.50
5.83
8.15
8.36
2.42
9.91
25.93
6.15
Total
944.62
69.96
94.48
1268.21
7.45
705
Table 3
Mix design of concrete mixes
Mix
design
Water/binder
ratio
Water
(kg/m3)
Cement
(kg/m3)
Bagasse
ash
(kg/m3)
Fine
aggregate
(kg/m3)
Coarse
aggregate
(kg/m3)
Sikament NN
(% by weight
of binder)
Sika Viscocrete-1
(% by weight
of binder)
CC2SP
CC2.5SP
CC3SP
CC3.5SP
CC4SP
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
225
225
225
225
225
500
500
500
500
500
875
875
875
875
875
750
750
750
750
750
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
2
2
2
2
2
5B2SP
5B2.5SP
5B3SP
5B3.5SP
5B4SP
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
0.43
225
225
225
225
225
500
500
500
500
500
25
25
25
25
25
875
875
875
875
875
750
750
750
750
750
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
10B2SP
10B2.5SP
10B3SP
10B3.5SP
10B4SP
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
0.41
225
225
225
225
225
500
500
500
500
500
50
50
50
50
50
875
875
875
875
875
750
750
750
750
750
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
15B2SP
15B2.5SP
15B3SP
15B3.5SP
15B4SP
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
225
225
225
225
225
500
500
500
500
500
75
75
75
75
75
875
875
875
875
875
750
750
750
750
750
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
20B2SP
20B2.5SP
20B3SP
20B3.5SP
20B4SP
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.37
0.37
225
225
225
225
225
500
500
500
500
500
100
100
100
100
100
875
875
875
875
875
750
750
750
750
750
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Second generation of superplasticizer, used as high range water reducing admixture, from sika construction chemicals, Switzerland.
Third generation of superplasticizer, used as viscosity modifying agent, from sika construction chemicals, Switzerland.
c
This particular designation represents control concrete mix made by incorporating viscosity modifying admixture and having 2% of superplasticizer by
weight of binder content.
d
In 5B2SP, 5B refers to the percentage of the bagasse ash by weight of binder content and 2SP refers to the amount of superplasticizer in percent by
weight of binder content. This particular designation represents mix having 5% of bagasse ash with 2% of superplasticizer by weight of binder content.
b
Table 4
Chemical and physical properties of cementitious materials
Chemical composition (%)
OPC
Bagasse ash
19.00
09.87
03.46
60.00
01.63
02.63
00.84
01.19
01.03
OPC
3.10
62.44
6.74
5.77
6.16
2.97
0.72
3.15
6.87
2.6
2.58
Bagasse ash
2.22
706
The sieve analysis of ne and coarse aggregate was performed in accordance with ASTM C136-04 [16]. The
results of sieve analysis of ne and coarse aggregate as
compared with the requirement of ASTM C33-03 [17] are
shown in Figs. 1 and 2. The physical properties of ne
and coarse aggregate are summarized in Table 5.
To achieve superior workability and placeability, high
range water reducing concrete admixture, Sikament NN
was used. The dosage of superplasticizer was varied from
2% to 4% by weight of binder content. The technical data
of Sikament NN is illustrated in Table 6.
For control concretes, Sika Viscocrete-1 was used as viscosity modifying agent. It is a third generation of superplasticizer and meets the requirements for superplasticizer
according to SIA 162 (1989) and prEN 934-2. The dosage
of superplasticizer was kept as 2% by weight of binder content. The technical data of Sika Viscocrete-1 is illustrated in
Table 6.
Table 6
Technical data of Sikament NN and Sika Viscocrete 1
Type
Appearance
Density (kg/l)
Sikament NN
Sika Viscocrete-1
Naphthalene formaldehyde
sulphonate
Dark brown
1.2
Modied polycarboxylate
Green liquid
1.1
Table 5
Physical properties of ne and coarse aggregate
Unit weight
(Kg/m3)
Absorption
Fineness
modulus
1953.54
1529.28
2.671
2.678
1.65
1.07
2.62
707
by using compaction factor apparatus as described by Neville [18]. Compressive strength of cylinders at 7 and 28 days
was carried out according to ASTM C39 [19]. Brief explanation and illustration of L-box and V-funnel test is given
below.
708
Fig. 6. Bagasse ash vs. L-box ratio with dierent percentage of superplastizer.
Fig. 7. Bagasse ash vs. V-funnel ow with dierent percentage of superplastizer *Mix 20B2SP was stucked.
709
Fig. 8. Bagasse ash vs. V-funnel at T5 min with dierent percentage of superplastizer *Mix 15B2SP and 20B2SP were stucked.
710
Fig. 9. Superplastizer vs. compressive strength with dierent percentage of bagasse ash.
Fig. 10. Bagasse ash vs. compressive strength with dierent percentage of superplastizer.
711
irrespective of the fact that the mix was within the EFNARC range or not.
4.3. Density of hardened SCC
Fig. 11. Bagasse ash vs. density of hardsmed concrete with dierent percentage of superplastizer.
712
Table 7
Comparison of the cost analysis
Material
Unit costa(PKR)
Cement (kg)
Coarse aggregate (kg)
Sand (kg)
Superplasticizer (Sikament NN) (L)
Superplasticizer (Sika viscocrete 1) (L)
Bagasse ash (kg)
Total
Percent reduction in cost = 35.63
a
6
0.198
0.105
69
247.25
Free of cost
Quantity (kg/m )
Amount (PKR)
Quantity (kg/m3)
Amount (PKR)
500
750
875
12.5
10
3000
148.5
91.87
862.5
2472.5
6575.37
500
750
875
14.375
75
3000
148.5
91.87
991.875
4232.245
[7]
[8]
[9]
5. Conclusions
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]