The Growth Trap

Every economy, every self-organizing system which is not also self-limiting within the bounds set
by its environment, grows until it exceeds the ability of that environment to support and sustain
it. It then collapses.
The collapse of a modern economy can be expected to be catastrophic.
When an economy first develops, acquiring resources is difficult and expensive. There is little
surplus to be invested, and growth is slow. This is despite the fact that resources are often
accessible and plentiful. The methods of extracting the resources are primitive and inefficient,
and there is little surplus. The demand for and uses for new resources are limited, and efforts at
developing new resources are often desultory.
However, as infrastructure is invested in and developed, the relative cost of acquiring and
developing resources decreases. More uses are found for extracted resources, providing motive
for ever greater extraction. Since it is easier and cheaper to develop uses for resources, rather than
new sources, demand, in general, outstrips supply, keeping the profit margins of producers high.
For the producers, this means more resources are available to invest in expanding extraction and
distribution, thus increasing the supply of these extracted resources available to be put to other
uses in the economy.
With growth, the economy is able to exploit resources at an accelerating rate. The limiting factor
is now no longer the costs of extraction, but the limitations in demand, the final uses for the
resources, and the necessary distribution systems, which also must be developed.
In order to extract, distribute and employ the resources, it is necessary to develop an
infrastructure, There is a cost, in resources consumed, to developing this infrastructure, There is
also a cost to maintaining this infrastructure, and there is also a cost to operating this
infrastructure.
When resources are still plentiful and cheap to extract, these costs are relatively low. The
infrastructure grows robustly, both because the costs of extraction are low and because it is still
new, maintenance costs are also low.
Clearly, however, with finite resources, or even a finite average density of resources, there are
limits to any economys ability to grow.
Indeed, as the plentiful and inexpensive resources are consumed, ever more marginal resources,
resources more costly to extract and process, more distant and difficult to transport, become
necessary to expand and sustain the economy. The infrastructure must be expanded to develop
these resources, and at an increasing cost. What is more, the increasing cost of extraction must be
passed on, and this increases the maintenance cost of the entire infrastructure. Less and fewer
resources are available for expansion of that infrastructure, which is necessary both to supply
other uses and to extract the ever more marginal and distant resources. These costs are
compounded by the fact that the increasing cost of extraction also increases the cost of operating
the infrastructure.
Eventually, as the availability of resources decreases, and their cost of extraction increases, the
cost in resources necessary to develop new infrastructure, and more importantly, the cost in

resources necessary to maintain and operate the infrastructure already built, exceeds the ability
of the economy to extract benefits from those resources.
Increasingly, maintenance will be sacrificed to cover the increasing costs of operation. The result
will eventually be a stage where the infrastructure can no longer be maintained, when the
maintenance budget passes below a critical threshold, but will be subject to increasing
catastrophic failure. This threshold is roughly when the budget is no longer able to cover both
preventative maintenance and essential repairs. Essential repairs will increase, eating into the
budget for preventative maintenance. As the budget for preventative maintenance decreases, the
demand for essential repairs will increase, in a vicious spiral. This process is sped by increasing
costs of operation, which it also enhances, and by the increasing rate of extraction of money and
real resources from the real economy by the financial economy.
In the case of the modern economy, then, there are two relevant systems: The real economy
itself, and the financial economy which feeds off the real economy. The financial economy
produces nothing of substance itself. When useful is serves as a multiplier of production, by
increasing the efficiency of allocation of resources. When overgrown it diverts more resources to
itself than it saves the real economy by that allocation of resources.
Once the financial economy evades the controls set on it by the real economy, it mimics the real
economy. It is also a non-self-limiting, self-organizing system, one whose environment off which
it feeds is the real economy. It to is subject to overgrowth and collapse.
This happens at a late stage in the development of the real economy, when the resources available
to the real economy to limit the growth of the financial economy are diverted away, in part by
increasing real costs in the rest of the economy and in part by manipulation by the financial sector
itself. Regulation then fails. (One thing that happens is the value of non-financial rewards offered
by the society declines, and become devalued, reducing the cost of corrupting officials.) The
financial sector then grows until it exceeds the ability of the real economy to sustain it. It grows
much more rapidly than the real economy did, since the financial infrastructure is much less
expensive to develop than the real infrastructure. (Increasingly, the financial economy diverts
resources from the real economy to itself. It does this by making finance nominally more
profitable than real investment, thus diverting money, that is demand, on resources from the real
economy. This causes deflation in the real economy, even as the quantity of various forms of
money in the financial economy increases without bounds. This is accompanied by ever greater
concentration of wealth, and ever more extravagant expenditure. This growth is in the demand
side of the economy, which conceals decline in the extracting and manufacturing sectors. GDP,
for instance, does not distinguish between growth in producing sectors and growth in consuming
sectors.
The real increasing costs of maintaining the real economy, (and in particular its infrastructure,)
and the increasing real costs of its extraction of real resources from the natural environment, are
hidden by the mechanisms of externalization of costs, both directly onto the environment
(pollution) and onto labor, by government subsidies, by defaulted debts, and by the deferred
maintenance of the real infrastructure. These manipulations make the cost of extraction, transport
and fabrication of real resources appear cheaper than they really are. However, while in nominal
terms the costs are reduced, in real terms the costs cannot be reduced, and must increase over
time. The real costs of these manipulations, however, transfer these costs onto other parts of the
producing sector. This increases the costs of production in these sectors, an increase greater than
the reduction in apparent nominal costs. These manipulations of the real economy, as well as the

financial manipulations which enable them, enrich the financial and consuming sectors, and
impoverish the actual producers of real goods and services. The productive sectors are deprived
the real resources necessary to grow, and ultimately to maintain themselves.
This financial extraction becomes ever more difficult and costly, as the real economy becomes
progressively impoverished. This decline in efficiency means more labor is required for the
extraction of wealth from the real economy. Thus, even though most labor is no longer involved
in real extraction and production, there results the paradox of an increasing burden on labor in
non-productive jobs. However, because of the decreasing efficiency, the profit to be made off
these jobs is very low, and decreasing, and the pay must be commensurate.
Meanwhile, since the cost of all maintenance increases, the cost of maintaining the burden of the
financial and consuming sectors is also increasing. As the concentration and availability of
extractable community assets declines, the costs required for extraction increase, the actual
financial profits decline to zero and even go negative. This is obscured by the fact that these
financial costs are increasingly externalized onto the real economy.
The degree of financial exploitation is not reduced, but merely more resources are devoted to the
process. Even as this happens, fewer resources are available to the real economy. This is both
because the financial sector externalizes its costs onto it onto the real economy, (and thus
appearing artificially profitable,) and because greater real resources must be expended in
acquiring resources from an increasingly impoverished natural environment. Combined, these
processes render the usual indicators of economic health and prosperity at least useless and even
more likely misleading. Much growth occurs in the wrong sectors, and is indicative of impending
failure, rather than success.
Mankind has yet to develop a self-limiting economy. Since economies ultimately serve a
population, clearly, with unrestricted population growth, no self-limiting economy is possible.
And any non-self-limiting economy will be subject to the growth trap.
More to the present, however, there is no evidence that capitalism is self-limiting. Only a selflimiting economy can survive the growth trap. Only an economy which can limit its consumption
of renewable resources to some rate less than the rate those resources are renewed, and its
consumption of non-renewable resources to some rate less than those resources can be recycled,
can be indefinitely sustained. All other economies will fail. And a failing economy will be
incapable of providing sufficient resources for the survival of most of its members. Indeed,
because of the enormous efficiencies brought about by a modern economy, if that economy fails,
such a failure will be catastrophic, and only small percentage of the people who depend on that
economy can be expected to survive.
There still seems a choice, however, although our political class seems incapable of confronting
the issue.