Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Marketing Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of Marketing
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Brand experience is conceptualized as sensations, feelings, cognitions, and behavioral responses evoked by
brand-related stimuli that are part of a brand's design and identity, packaging, communications, and environments.
The authors distinguish several experience dimensions and construct a brand experience scale that includes four
dimensions: sensory, affective, intellectual, and behavioral. In six studies, the authors show that the scale is reliable,
valid, and distinct from other brand measures, including brand evaluations, brand involvement, brand attachment,
customer delight, and brand personality. Moreover, brand experience affects consumer satisfaction and loyalty
directly and indirectly through brand personality associations.
Keywords', experience marketing, brand experience, customer experience management, scale development,
marketing communications
Product Experience
Product experiences occur when consumers interact with
products?for example, when consumers search for prod
Construct
Consumption Experience
Experiences also occur when consumers consume and use
products. Consumption experiences are multidimensional
and include hedonic dimensions, such as feelings, fantasies,
lyzed hedonic goals that occur during and after the con
sumption of, for example, museums, river rafting, baseball,
1996).
Brand Experience / 53
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Cognitive Science
Sengupta, and Aaker 2005). That is, consumers are not sin
cere or excited about the brand; they merely project these
traits onto brands. In contrast, brand experiences are actual
sensations, feelings, cognitions, and behavioral responses.
Thus, because brand experience differs from brand evalua
tions, involvement, attachment, and customer delight, brand
Management
Philosophical Investigations
Summary
and social.
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Experience
brands.
Scale
Brand Experience / 55
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
TABLE 1
Descriptions of Experiential Brands
Abercrombie & Fitch
It's a complete experience when you enter the store.
Stimulates me; sexy.
It's like a membership in an exclusive, country-clubish
community.
American Express
Apple/iPod
BMW
I feel young; I feel stylish.
It's just great to drive.
Crest
I feel refreshed.
Disney
Home Depot
MasterCard
Makes me think about precious things in life.
I feel more youthful than using American Express or
Visa.
Nike
Makes me think of how to live an active lifestyle.
Makes me feel powerful.
I want to work out.
Starbucks
Smells nice and is visually warm.
It's comfortable and puts me in a better mood.
It's like being around a Barnes & Nobles crowd.
Target
W Hotel
Stimulates my senses.
know."
HBO
Puts me in a good mood.
Service is disappointing.
Washington Mutual
Williams-Sonoma
I had a feeling of nostalgia.
Full of memories of home.
It's relaxed and unhurried.
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
the Scale
Blue (5), Tiffany (4), Virgin (4), Target (4), McDonald's (4),
Hotels (4), Barnes & Noble (4), and Starbucks (4). The non
experiential brands were Wal-Mart (7), IBM (6), Gristedes
(5), Poland Spring (4), and Dell (4).
In the main study, we asked a new sample of students
2001).
Brand Experience / 57
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
brand experience.
Column 1).
(.78).
TABLE 2
Study 3: Exploratory Factor Analysis: Revealed
Brand Experience Dimensions
Factor
Sensory/
Affective Behavioral Intellectual
Item
This brand makes a
strong impression
on my visual sense
interesting in a
This brand is an
I engage in physical
actions and
behaviors when I
Poland Spring.
in bodily
I engage in a lot of
thinking when I
encounter this
of the Dimensions
This brand
stimulates my
curiosity and
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
TABLE 3
Study 3: Means by Brand for Overall Experience and Experience Dimensions
Brand
Group
LEGO 3
Victoria's Secret 1
?Pod 5
Starbucks 2
Ferrari 6
Toys "R" Us 6
Harley-Davidson 4
Adidas 5
Nokia 1
Hershey's 5
Sudoku 6
Blackberry 2
Samsung 3
L'Or?al 3
Gillette 3
Tropicana 5
American Express 4
Overall
Intellectual
Behavioral
5.34C
5.28b
5.15b
5.34b
5.78c
5.70b
5.55b
5.72c
5.263
5.24
5.67b
5.03
5.273
5.78c
4.63
4.82
4.75
5.16
4.33
5.47b
5.60C
4.63b
4.353
4.26
3.50
3.85
3.36
5.193
5.51b
5.24b
4.62
3.84
5.51b
5.35b
4.67
4.39b
5.52b
3.33
4.47
4.42
4.41
4.33
4.26
4.17
4.07
Hallmark 1
Affective
4.56
Gatorade 4
Prada 2
Motorola 5
Dannon 1
Calvin Klein 6
Sensory
4.953
4.90
4.72
4.70
4.64
4.64
Disney 6
Puma 1
Viagra 4
Clinique 2
Overall Experience
3.92
3.86
3.85
3.74
3.63
3.62
3.60
3.58
3.52
3.51
3.39
3.27
2.97
4.18
4.70
5.79c
5.253
4.85
4.71
5.133
4.66
4.46
4.63
4.90
4.03
3.92
4.32
4.40
4.14
4.42
4.17
3.67
3.90
3.57
4.07
4.25
3.55
2.99
4.60
4.42
4.38
4.02
3.71
4.75
3.31
3.80
3.32
3.75
3.46
3.76
3.53
3.67
4.26
3.20
3.76
3.75
3.31
3.01
4.25
4.18
3.62
3.55
3.56
3.66
3.14
4.14
3.22
5.27C
4.00
3.87
3.26
2.87
2.95
3.18
3.94
3.46
3.56
2.97
2.68
3.35
2.80
3.71
4.52
4.58
4.97
5.68C
4.56
3.80
3.65
3.86
3.91
3.88
4.49
3.39
3.62
3.12
2.69
3.73
3.23
2.89
2.91
3.08
4.17
aModerately differentiated.
bHighly differentiated.
cUnique.
Notes: all ps < .10.
participate.
An exploratory factor analysis revealed three factors
with eigenvalues greater than 1. The three factors explained
67% of the variance. After Varimax rotation, a clean factor
structure emerged. As Table 2 shows, the 3 sensory and 3
affective items loaded on the first factor, the 3 behavioral
nal consistency.
On the basis of these results, we investigated the follow
ing models further: (1) the three-factor model (sensory/
affective, behavioral, and intellectual factors), (2) the four
factor model (sensory, affective, behavioral, and intellectual
factors), and (3) the nested model (two first-order factors?
Brand Experience / 59
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
FIGURE 1
Study 3: Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Four-Factor Model
This brand makes a strong impression
o-H
o-H
o-H
sensory way.
my senses.3
brand.3
o-H
o-H
o-H
o-H
experiences.
*p<.01.
Notes: All coefficient values are standardized and appear above the associated path. Dotted lines represent correlations.
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
TABLE 4
Study 3: Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model Fit Comparisons
Model
Null
One factor
Three factor
"Nested"3
Four factor
One-factor higher order (four subdimensions)
Chi-Square
d.f.
5079.50
1043.50
527.90
1497.16
1209.89
278.61
278.61
66
54
51
48
48
48
44
Chi-Square Differenceb
515.60, p<.001
GFI
CFI
RMSEA
.92
.92
.91
.91
.09
.08
model).
Brand Experience / 61
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
to .9.
ings were less than .37. A final factor analysis that restricted
TABLE 5
Study 5: Exploratory Factor Analysis (Promax
Rotation), Brand Experience Dimensions, and
Factor
factor (all evaluation item loadings > .78); all other loadings
Experience Scale
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
ality?namely, excitement.
Hypotheses Development
(.63).
Finally, we examined a four-factor solution, which
explained 81% of the variance. In both the oblique and the
orthogonal solutions, we obtained the same factor patterns
for the brand feelings and brand relationship factors. How
Conclusion
The 12-item brand experience scale captures in a reliable
and stable way four dimensions of brand experience: sen
sory, affective, behavioral, and intellectual. The scale is
short and easy to administer, and it is internally consistent
behavioral outcomes.
Brand Experience / 63
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Procedure
A total of 209 students participated in Study 6 for a com
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
TABLE 6
Sincerity
Sincerity
Sincerity
Sincerity
1
2
3
4
.03
.34
.16
.45
.07
.17
.04
.08
.14
.06
.16
.33
.86
.79
.86
.50
.42
.27
.22
.32
.10
Notes: Bold values indicate the factor on which each item predomi
nantly loads.
model had a worse fit: GFI = .84, CFI = .88, and RMSEA =
.096, with %2(146) =1186. The difference in chi-square val
General Discussion
Brand experiences arise in a variety of settings when con
sumers search for, shop for, and consume brands. Accord
own factor.
(.24 + .15 x .59), and the total indirect effect is .36 (.69 x
.67 x .59 + .69 x .13), resulting in a total effect of .69. The
provide for their customers, they can use the scale for
Brand Experience / 65
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
FIGURE 2
Study 6: Discriminant and Predictive Validity of the Brand Experience Scale
L_2_,.?,,?
Ruggedness
Sophistication
Competence
Excitement
Sincerity
O-J Sensory L 86
O-H Affective
O-H Intellectual
O-H Behavioral
*p<.01.
brand.
In addition to research on the scale, we encourage
research on the experience concept. For example, many
experiences, especially in the services industry (e.g., restau
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
REFERENCES
Aaker, David (1996), Building Strong Brands. New York: The Free
212-52.
Press.
153-63.
Chang, Pao-Long and Ming-Hua Chieng (2006), "Building
45-58.
45 (1), 35-53.
Dewey, John (1922), Human Nature and Conduct. New York: The
Modern Library.
67-82.
(10), 1387-1400.
Cacioppo, John T. and Richard E. Petty (1982), "The Need for -and John Deighton (1989), "Managing What Consumers
Learn from Experience," Journal of Marketing, 53 (April),
Cognition," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42
1-20.
(1), 116-31.
79-89.
Celsi, Richard L., Randall L. Rose, and Thomas Leigh (1993), "An
Exploration of High-Risk Leisure Consumption Through Sky
diving," Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (June), 1-23.
Chaiken, Shelly, Akiva Liberman, and Alice H. Eagly (1989), "Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing Within and
Beyond the Persuasion Context," in Unintended Thought,
Brand Experience / 67
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Holt, Douglas B. (1995), "How Consumers Consume: A Typology -(1993), "Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the
Satisfaction Response," Journal of Consumer Research, 20
of Consumption Practices," Journal of Consumer Research, 22
(June), 1-16.
(December), 418-30.
Huffman, Cynthia and Michael J. Houston (1993), "Goal-Oriented - (1997), Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the
Consumer. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Experiences and the Development of Knowledge," Journal of
Consumer Research, 20 (September), 190-207.
-, Roland T. Rust, and Sajeev Varki (1997), "Customer
Hui, Michael K. and John E.G. Bateson (1991), "Perceived Con
Delight: Foundations, Findings, and Managerial Insight," Jour
trol and the Effects of Crowding and Consumer Choice on the
nal of Retailing, 73 (3), 311-36.
Service Experience," Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (Sep
Park, C. Whan and Deborah J. Maclnnis (2006), "What's In and
tember), 174-84.
What's Out: Questions over the Boundaries of the Attitude
Izard, Carroll E. (1978), Human Emotions, 2d ed. New York:
Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (1), 16-18.
Plenum.
Parsons, Andrew and Denise Conroy (2006), "Sensory Stimuli and
Johar, Gita, Jaideep Sengupta, and Jennifer Aaker (2005), "Two
E-Tailers," Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5 (1), 69-81.
Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait Versus
Petty, Richard E. and John T Cacioppo (1986), "The Elaboration
Evaluative Inferencing," Journal of Marketing Research, 42
Likelihood Model of Persuasion," in Advances in Experimental
(November), 458-69.
and Social Psychology, Vol. 19, Leonard Berkowitz, ed. New
Jones, Monique A. (1999), "Entertaining Shopping Experiences:
York: Academic Press, 123-205.
An Exploratory Investigation," Journal of Retailing and Con
Pham, Michel (2004), "The Logic of Feelings," Journal of Con
sumer Services, 6 (3), 129-39.
sumer Psychology, 14 (4), 360-69.
Joy, Annamma and John F. Sherry Jr. (2003), "Speaking of Art as
Pine,
Joseph B., II, and James H. Gilmore (1999), The Experience
Embodied Imagination: A Multisensory Approach to Under
Economy: Work Is Theatre and Every Business a Stage. Cam
standing Aesthetic Experience," Journal of Consumer
bridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Research, 20 (September), 259-82.
Pinker, Steven (1997), How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.
Keller, Kevin L. (1987), "Memory Factors in Advertising: The
Effects of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations,"
Plutchik, Robert and Henry Kellerman, eds. (1989), Emotion:
Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (December), 316-33.
Theory, Research, and Experience. San Diego: Academic
Press.
uary), 1-22.
Kempf, Deanna S. and Robert E. Smith (1998), "Consumer Pro
A Structural Modeling Approach," Journal of Marketing
Research, 35 (August), 325-38.
Kerin, Roger A., Ambuj Jain, and Daniel J. Howard (1992), "Store
Shopping Experience and Consumer Price-Quality-Value Per
ceptions," Journal of Retailing, 68 (4), 376-97.
(September), 127^6.
235-45.
McAlexander, James H, John W. Schouten, and Harold F. Koenig (2002), "Building Brand Community," Journal of Marketing,
66 (January), 38-54.
McAllister, Leigh and Edgar A. Pessemier (1982), "Variety Seek
ing Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review," Journal of Con
sumer Research, 9 (December), 311-22.
Meyers-Levy, Joan and Laura A. Peracchio (1995), "How the Use
of Color in Advertising Affects Attitudes: The Influence of Pro
412-32.
McGraw-Hill.
This content downloaded from 193.226.34.227 on Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:56:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms