0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
17 Ansichten3 Seiten
This is Denver Judges renewed Motion to Dismiss for lack of Jurisdiction. I still don't understand their arguement. The State Judicial Branch web page includes them in the "State Judiciary"
This is Denver Judges renewed Motion to Dismiss for lack of Jurisdiction. I still don't understand their arguement. The State Judicial Branch web page includes them in the "State Judiciary"
This is Denver Judges renewed Motion to Dismiss for lack of Jurisdiction. I still don't understand their arguement. The State Judicial Branch web page includes them in the "State Judiciary"
STATE OF COLORADO
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS:
1525 Sherman Street, 4" Floor
Denver, CO 80203
Peter Coulter,
Complainant
ACOURT USE ONLY &
v.
Colorado Judiciary, et al., Case No. OS-2016-0024
Respondents. a
‘Attorney for the following Denver County Court Judges
‘named in the Complaint: Hon, John M. Marcucei; Hon.
Doris E. Burd; Hon. Beth A. Faragher; Hon. Gary M.
Jackson; Hon. Nicole M. Rodarte; Hon. Andre L. Rudolph;
Hon. Theresa A. Spahn
DAVID W. BROADWELL, Assistant City Attomey for
the City and County of Denver
Atty. Reg. No, 12177
1437 Bannock St. Room #353
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: 720-865-8754
Facsimile: 720-865-8796
Email: david broadwell@denvergov.org,
RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS DENVER COUNTY COURT JUDGES
Having reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the Respondents, the Denver county court,
judges, hereby renew their original motion dated October 27, 2016 seeking the dismissal of the
Denver judges from this case. For the reasons set forth in Denver's original motion, the Denver
judges should be dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), C.R.C.P. due to this court’s lack of subject
‘matter jurisdiction over any Denver charter officer in regard to campaign finance complaints.
Denver acknowledges that, if this Court grants the State Judicial Defendants’ motion to
dismiss the entire First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may begranted, the Court may deem it unnecessary to rule on Denver's own motion to dismiss.
However, Denver would respectfully urge the Court to grant both motions in order to impress
upon the Complainant that, regardless of how or whether he chooses to retool and refile his
complaint and name state court judges in any future campaign finance complaint, he should not
attempt to include Denver county court judges in any such complaint due to this court’s lack of
jurisdiction over such judges under In re the complaint filed by the City of Colorado Springs, 277
P.3d 937 (Colo. App. 2012).
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 10" Day of November, 2016.
David W. Broadwell, 1217
Attomey for the Respondents, Denver County Court
JudgesCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Thereby certify that today, November 10,2016, I electronically served the foregoing
Entry of Appearance on the following parties:
Peter Coulter
151 Summer Street, #654
Morrison, CO 80465
transparenteou Leom
Pro se Complainant
‘Matthew D. Grove, Assistant Solicitor General
Christopher M. Jackson, Assistant Attomey General
Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center
1300 Broadway, 6" Floor
Denver, CO 80203
mall grove@coag.u
christopher jackson@coay.gov
Attorneys for Respondents Colorado Judiciary, et al
Martha M. Tiemey, Atty Reg. #27521
TIERNEY LAWRENCE LLC
225 E 16th Avenue, Suite 350
Denver, CO 80203
Telephone: (720) 242-7577
E-mail: mtierneyticrneylawrenee.com
(s/ David W. Broadwell
City and County of Denver