Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
University of Wisconsin-Madison
0 / 35
Outline
3 Example: Hydrofluorination
7 Conclusions
1 / 35
FHR vs. MSRE
3 / 35
Salt Purification
Figure : Purified flibe. The crystals indicate the presence of L2B or the
Li2 BeF4 molecule. This flibe was used to test FHR materials.
5 / 35
Corrosion Tests
6 / 35
What does the FHR need next?
7 / 35
Outline
3 Example: Hydrofluorination
7 Conclusions
8 / 35
Review: Reaction Equilibrium
The reaction
aA + bB ⌦ cC + dD (1)
has an equilibrium constant, K which can be defined as
[C ]c [D]d
K= . (2)
[A]a [B]b
a= . (3)
G= RT ln(K ). (4)
9 / 35
Fluorine Potential
• In the case of fluoride salts the anion is F . Olander, calling on
previous work done with UO2 fuels, created the ‘fluorine
potential’.1
GF2 = RT ln pF2 . (5)
11 / 35
Outline
3 Example: Hydrofluorination
7 Conclusions
12 / 35
Example: Fluoride Potential Set by Hydrofluorination
13 / 35
Graphical Hydrofluorination
-65
Metal
NiF2
G F - (kcal/mol)
FeF2
Metal Fluoride
-70
CrF2
HF
-75
Hydrofluorination
-80
500 550 600 650
Temperature (o C)
14 / 35
Outline
3 Example: Hydrofluorination
7 Conclusions
15 / 35
Example: Fluoride Potential of the MSRE
Which shows that the ratio of U(III,IV) was the determining factor.
✓ ◆
aUF4
G F = RT ln + ( GUF4 GUF3 ) . (13)
aUF3
16 / 35
Historical MSRE Potential
- 80
- 82
- 83
Figure : As the MSRE’s primary loop transmuted UF4 into fission product
fluorides, it oxidized the salt. Beryllium was used to counteract this.
17 / 35
Fluoride Potential vs. Redox Potential
18 / 35
Historical MSRE Potential: Revisted
-80 -0.60
-0.65
-82
-0.70
-83
-0.75
-84
3 Example: Hydrofluorination
7 Conclusions
20 / 35
MSRE Beryllium Additions
Cr
200 Fe
150
100
50
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000
Full Power Hours
Figure : The MSRE shows only a few Figure : Metal ion concentration in the
graphs, dependent on metal MSRE does not follow the redox
concentrations, to reduce the salt. voltage. Not reliable for beryllium
Sha↵er, J. H. (1971). Preparation and additions.
Handling of Salt Mixtures for the
Molten Salt Reactor Experiment.
21 / 35
Example: ICE Table for Beryllium Addition
aBeF2
K= . (15)
aBe aF2
aBeF2 (aBeF2 *)
Q= !K = ⇣ ⌘ (16)
(aBe *) aF2 (aBe +) aF2 +
22 / 35
Beryllium Additions: equilibrium change ratios
Be + 2F ⌦ BeF2
Stoichiometry 1 2 1
Reactant Biased x 2x x
Product Biased x 2x x
23 / 35
Beryllium Additions: quantifying setup
GBeF
2 (aBeF2 + BeF2 x)
e RT = ⇣⇣ ⌘ ⌘⇣ ⌘ (18)
aBe0 + nBe
Be nSalt Be x aF2 ( F x)2
24 / 35
Activities by Hitch and Baes
1.00
0.70
0.50 BeF2
LiF
g
0.30
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
cBeF2
25 / 35
Beryllium Additions: MSRE Data
Avg. GF x ⇥ 106
Addition F ⇥ 1016
(kcal/mol) (mol %)
1 -80.1 2.96 331.17
2 -80.5 0.99 411.92
3 -80.7 1.61 226.09
4 -81.3 10.5 68.04
5 -82.2 11.5 31.93
6 -82.4 8.27 32.06
7 -82.7 7.81 24.14
8 -83.2 9.69 13.69
9 -83.6 8.20 11.57
10 -83.9 11.5 7.82
11 -84.1 9.56 5.94
27 / 35
Beryllium Additions: GF vs. F
5. × 10-14
1. × 10-14
5. × 10-15
F
1. × 10-15
5. × 10-16
-84 -83 -82 -81 -80
GF (kcal/mol)
-70
mgBe /kgFlibe
12.5
G F- b (kcal/mol)
-75
10.0
7.5
5.0
-80 2.5
-85
-85 -80 -75 -70
GF - a (kcal/mol)
29 / 35
Outline
3 Example: Hydrofluorination
7 Conclusions
30 / 35
Electrochemical Probe
31 / 35
Measuring Redox Potential
-0.44
-76.4
-0.45 -76.6
Redox Potential (HF|H2 =0)
GF- (kcal/mol)
-0.46 -76.8
-77.0
-0.47
-77.2
-0.48
-77.4
-0.49
-77.6
-0.50
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (s)
32 / 35
Outline
3 Example: Hydrofluorination
7 Conclusions
33 / 35
Conclusion
34 / 35
Questions
34 / 35
Outline
8 Backup Slides
35 / 35
Beryllium Additions: making an assumption
• Assume (for now) that beryllium is not in solution with the salt
and behaves ideally. Be = 1.
GBeF
2 (aBeF2 + BeF2 x)
e RT = ⇣⇣ ⌘ ⌘⇣ ⌘ (19)
Be0 + nnSalt
Be
x aF2 ( F x)2
• If you add in this activity coefficient and solve for it later, it turns
out to be ⇠ 1.0003.
35 / 35
Beryllium Additions: replacing unknowns
35 / 35
Beryllium Additions: change after equilibrium
35 / 35
Beryllium Additions: solving for x and F
• Three equations
GBeF
2 (aBeF2 + BeF2 x)
e RT = 0 2 G ! 1 (23)
⇣⇣ ⌘ ⌘ Fa
B RT C
Be0
nBe
+ nSalt x @e ( F x)2 A
2 G 2 G
!
F Fa
b 2
e RT = e RT ( F x) (24)
✓ ◆
GBeF2 2 GFa
Be0 = aBeF2 exp (25)
RT RT