Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
BRAD ARMPIT,
Defendant.
x--------------------------------------------x
ANSWER
COMES NOW, the defendant, through the undersigned counsel and unto this
Honorable Court, most respectfully avers:
1.
That he ADMITS the contents of paragraphs 1 and 2 only insofar as his
personal circumstances are concerned;
2.
That defendant is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief
as to the veracity of the averments in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the complaint;
3.
That defendant does not, at the moment, have all the records of payments he
made to plaintiff, so that he also does not have information sufficient to form a
belief as the truth of the allegations in paragraphs 5-7 of the complaint and,
therefore, DENY them.
4.
WHEREFORE, the defendant respectfully prays that the complaint be
dismissed with costs against the plaintiff.
Other relief and remedies as may be deemed just and equitable under the
premises are likewise prayed for.
City of Manila for City of Cebu October 3, 2016.
KURIMAO, KURIMAO and ABLAO LAW OFFICE
Counsel for the Defendant
Suite 235 The Tower
Malate, Manila
By:
DESIREE E. KURIMAO
Roll No. 98765
IBP No, 12345/1-3-2012/Manila
PTR No. 34567/1-3-2012/Manila
Copy furnished:
ATTY. PARK K. TILAOPAO
Counsel for the Plaintiff
EXPLANATION
Copy of the foregoing ANSWER was served to plaintiffs counsel by registered
mail due to time and distance constraints and for lack of the undersigneds staff
who can serve the same in person.
DESIREE E. KURIMAO