Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274375441
Estuarine Circulation
Chapter November 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-8801-4_176
CITATIONS
READS
112
3 authors:
Roberto Fontes
University of So Paulo
14 PUBLICATIONS 57 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Fernando P. Andutta
Griffith University
25 PUBLICATIONS 125 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Estuarine Circulation
Copyright Year
2014
Copyright Holder
Corresponding Author
Family Name
Fontes
Particle
Given Name
Roberto F. C.
Suffix
Author
Organization/University
Street
City
So Vicente
State
SP
Country
Brazil
rcfontes@clp.unesp.br
Family Name
Miranda
Particle
Given Name
Luiz B.
Suffix
Author
Organization/University
Street
City
So Paulo
State
SP
Country
Brazil
Family Name
F. P.
Particle
Given Name
Andutta
Suffix
Division/Department
Organization/University
Street
ACT 2600
Country
Australia
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
1
Definition
An estuary is a semi-enclosed coastal body of water which
has a free connection with the open sea and within which
salt water is measurably diluted with fresh water derived
from land drainage.
Introduction
Estuaries are unique aquatic environments that share
terrestrial and marine contributions, creating a set of
interesting physical characteristics including bimodal
circulation patterns (fresh water flowing along the surface
and saline water entering along the bottom) and mixing
processes induced by tides. To a lesser extent, continental
shelf processes such as storm surges and wind-driven
circulation can also influence circulation in estuaries.
At first glance, most estuaries are governed by tidal
oscillation and influenced by river discharges, so
mixing processes account for most of the hydrodynamic
characterization of estuaries. The resulting velocity
and salinity fields have strong time variability, and
the non-steady-state current patterns may be altered by
sediment erosion, transport, and sedimentation, which
contribute to bathymetric and margin changes.
M.J. Kennish (ed.), Encyclopedia of Estuaries, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-8801-4,
Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
2
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
Pioneer investigations
In 1875, the Swedish researcher F. L. Ekman performed
experiments in the Gtaelf River Estuary (Sweden) to
investigate estuarine processes (quoted in Defant (1961),
539). From the analysis of the salinity distribution on
August 1875, Ekman observed that a strong outflowing
current could not be compensated only by river discharges, but instead by a compensating upward motion
(upwelling) of saline water from the bottom.
Upwelling is a vertical advective motion that breaks the
continuity of the bidirectional motion field observed by
Ekman. The vertical motion was calculated theoretically
under steady-state conditions for the first time by Pritchard
(1954), solving the salt balance equation using extensive
experimental data from the James River Estuary
(Virginia, USA) during the summer of 1950.
Ekman investigated the occurrence of currents
up-estuary in the lower layers of the estuary in a paper
published in 1899, quoted in Defant (1961, 539).
Although this paper was only descriptive, Ekman was
aware that the river discharge input and the salinity stratification were the main forcing mechanisms of the observational results.
It was only in 1952 almost 60 years later that
D. V. Pritchard became the first researcher to link estuarine
circulation to the forcing by the horizontal density
gradient. He used observations from the James River
estuary to demonstrate this mechanism, quoted in Geyer
(2010, 13).
Definitions and variability
Ketchum (1951) focused on the exchanges of fresh and
salt water in tidal estuaries and defined an estuary as a
body of water in which the river water mixes and measurably dilutes sea water. The most classical definition is
that stated by Pritchard (1952) and Cameron and Pritchard
(1963), An estuary is a semi-enclosed coastal body of
water which has a free connection with the open sea and
within which salt water is measurably diluted with fresh
water derived from land drainage. Several other definitions are found in the literature. Perillo (1995) defined an
estuary as a semi-enclosed coastal body of water that
extends to the effective limit of tidal influence, within
which sea water entering from one or more free connections with the open sea, or any other saline coastal body
of water, is significantly diluted with fresh water derived
from land drainage, and can sustain euryhaline biological
species from either part or the whole of their life cycle.
These definitions along with others by Dionne (1963),
Kjerfve (1987), and Dalrymple et al. (1992) have the
125
Classification of estuaries
Advection and mixing processes can be used to compare
and classify different estuaries. The major classification
schemes are based on salinity stratification, circulation,
and mixing. Figure 1 shows a simple steady-state dynamic
balance analysis of the interaction of these processes
based on a longitudinal section presented by Geyer
(2010).
The first estuary classification was suggested by
Stommel (1951) taking into account the main forces as
tides, fresh water discharge, and wind. Raritan, Pamlico
Sound, and Mississippi river estuaries of New Jersey,
North Carolina, and Louisiana (USA) have as primary
forcings the tide, wind, and river, respectively. The important characteristic of these estuaries is the vertical salinity
stratification. The Raritan River estuary, which is the
shallowest one, is nearly vertically homogeneous. The
Mississippi River estuary is the deepest, being forced by
micro-tides.
Pritchard (1952) introduced a classification scheme
based on the main geomorphologic estuarine features.
Four types of estuaries were differentiated: (1) coastal
159
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
plain estuaries or drowned river valleys; (2) bar built estuaries; (3) fjords, typically in higher latitude regions; and
(4) tectonic estuaries.
Taking into account vertical salinity stratification,
Stommel (1953) suggested the following classification:
(1) salt wedge estuaries, river discharge dominates with
vertical mixing absent; (2) fjords, deep estuaries (several
hundred meters) characterized by a highly stratified upper
layer; and (3) moderately and highly stratified estuaries,
dependent on the intensity of the vertical mixing and
establishment of a steady-state bidirectional circulation.
This classification was described by Pritchard (1955),
Cameron and Pritchard (1963), and Schubel and Pritchard
(1972), taking into account improvements related
to dynamic conditions due to estuarine circulation and
salinity stratification.
During the 1960s, estuarine classifications were based
on quantitative criteria. Ippen and Harleman (1961)
introduced the stratification number, based on laboratory
experimental results, and Hansen and Rattray (1966)
introduced the stratification and circulation parameters.
Hansen and Rattray (1965) were the first investigators
to link estuarine classification with its physical properties.
They used salinity stratification and circulation in
a theoretical development based on the analytical solutions of a bi-dimensional system of equations (motion,
mass and salt conservation, and a linear state equation)
under steady-state conditions, applied to a laterally homogeneous estuary. The results were vertical profiles of the
longitudinal velocity and salinity used for a theoretical
deduction of the stratification-circulation diagram
(Hansen and Rattray, 1966). The coordinates (axis) of this
diagram are the stratification (pe) and the circulation (pc)
s
parameters defined by pe Sf S
dS
and pc uufs, respecS
S
tively, where Sf and Ss are the time mean salinities on the
bottom and surface, respectively, and S its mean-depth
value. The velocity us is the time mean value on the
estuary surface and uf is theone generated
by the river
Qf
discharge (Qf) defined by uf A , where A is the
cross-sectional area.
The stratification (pe) and circulation (pc) parameters
D
are linked to a third parameter u defined by u f ff
,
D
A
where fD and fA are the salt flux into the estuary due to
turbulent diffusion and the advection, respectively. When
fD >> fA, it follows that u ! 1 and the salt flux are
dominated by the tidal mixing; for fD << fA, u ! 0 and
the salt flux is dominated by advection (gravitational
circulation). Then, this parameter varies from 0 to 1, and
u u(pc, pe) is expressed theoretically by Miranda
et al. (2012):
pc 1:52 u 0;
3
1
For u 0 (1) has no physical meaning, and for u 1 the
salt transport is due to the turbulent diffusion only.
The equation is thus reduced to:
32 76pc 1:5
152
pc 1:52 0
3
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
4
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
The relationship
between fluid density (r) and its
!
velocity v is derived from the principle of mass conservation (continuity equation). Its analytical deduction may
be made with different theoretical developments found in
oceanography texts (Sverdrup et al., 1942; Lacombe,
1965; Kinsman, 1965, among others). A convenient mathematical expression is the Eulerian formulation:
@r
1 dr
!
!
r v 0, or
v 0
@t
r dt
@u @v @w
0
@x @y @z
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
333
332
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
A simple integrated equation of salt conservation, taking into account only the advection process on salt mixing,
may be easily obtained applyinghthe divergence
operator to
i
!
!
the mass flux vector S r v S r v M L2 T1 .
Under the hypothesis that the salinity (density) and the
velocity field in the estuarine domain are in steady state
represented by its time mean value during tidal cycles,
the divergence of the salt mass flux is zero:
!
Sr v 0
383
and as in (5)
!
! !
Sr v dV
Sr v n dA 0
V
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
A
1
1
8b
A
402
403
404
405
ui
406
407
408
409
or
Si Qf
Qs
;
Si Ss
9a
or
Qi
Ss Q f
:
Si Ss
9b
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
@S !
v S 0
@t
10b
@S
Kx
@t @x @y @z
@x
@x
@
@S
@
@S
Ky
Kz
Ssinks Ssources
@y
@y
@z
@z
@S
0 0
0 0
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
11
411
10a
and
! !
Sr v n dA Ss rs vs As Si ri vi Ai 0
410
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
0 0
<uS >
<vS >
<wS >
; Kx
; Kx
;
@S
@S
@S
@x
@y
@z
12
the symbol < > indicates time mean value of the correlations of small-scale velocity components multiplied by
the small-scale salinity variation. These values, multiplied
by the density (Kx r < u0 S0 >; Ky r < v0 S0 >;
Kz r < w0 S0 >), are the salt fluxes [ML2T1] generated by turbulent diffusion.
441
442
443
444
445
446
6
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
Nx
Ny
r @x @x
@x
@y
@y
@
@u
Nz
@z
@z
@v
@v
@v @v
u v w fu
@t
@x
@y @z
1 @p @
@v
@
@v
Nx
Ny
r @y @x
@x
@y
@y
@
@v
Nz
@z
@z
1 @p
g
r @z
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
13
14
@ uB @ wB
0
@x
@z
Ssinks Ssources
18
In (16), (17), and (18), the quantities u, w, and S are
mean values across the estuary width (B). This set of equations has the effect of decoupling the motion and mixing
equations, i.e., the velocity components (u, w) obtained
from the solutions of (16) and (17) are used in the (18)
for the salinity profile solution. In the assumption that
the width is constant (B cte) and Nz >> Nx, and
Kz >> Kx, these equations may be further simplified.
Equation (15) assumes that the hydrostatic balance and
the
of the horizontal gradient pressure force
expression
1 @p
r @x may be obtained in terms of its barotropic,
baroclinic, and barometric components. On the assumption that the density (r) is known, the only unknown is
the pressure (p), which may be easily obtained by vertical
integration along the water column, from a depth z up to
the sea surface slope Z(x, y, t) (relative to a level surface):
Z
px, y, z, t pa x, y, t g rdz
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
19
15
1 @
@u
@
@u
BNx
BNz
B @x
@x
@z
@z
@S
@S
@S 1 @
@S
@
@S
u w
BKx
BKz
@t
@x
@z B @x
@x
@z
@z
16
17
@p @pa
@Z
@r A5
20
@
dz
g 4 rZ
@x @x
@x
@x
489
where
r is the density on the surface. From this result,
r Z
with rZ 1, the expression for the longitudinal component
of the gradient pressure force (per mass unit) has three
components:
492
490
491
1 @p
1 @pa
@Z g
g
r @x
r @x
@x r
Z
z
@r
dz
@x
493
494
495
21
496
498
497
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
23
559
Analytical models
The first steady-state analytical model for determining
time mean longitudinal velocities in a coastal plain estuary
was developed by Pritchard and Kent (1956) using the lateral and longitudinal components of the equation of
motion, the tidal velocity amplitude, and the relationship
between the vertical and lateral eddy stress. The method
was applied to stations in the James River Estuary, studied
in detail during several tidal cycles in the summer (June
and July, 1950). The theoretical velocity profiles agreed
well with the observational data, showing typical velocity
profiles of a partially mixed estuary seaward and
up-estuary motion on the upper and lower layers, respectively, and no motion at mid-depths. The Pritchard and
Kent paper is a pioneering article showing the importance
of the comparison of theoretical versus experimental data.
Hansen and Rattray (1965) developed a steady-state
analytical model for the circulation and mixing of partially
mixed estuaries. The laterally averaged equations of
motion and the mass and salt conservation equations
(16,
@u 17,@uand
@18)
@Swere
used with the simplifications:
,
0
and a linear equation of state
<<
@x
@z
@z @x
of seawater r r(S) for the hydrodynamic equations closure. Using similarity solution techniques, the model considers the balance of the barotropic and baroclinic modes,
with wind stress forcing on the surface (u 0) and
no-sleep condition at the bottom [u(h) 0]. The central
regime solutions for u u(z) and S S(x, z) depend on
subjective numerical values such as the longitudinal density gradient and the mean salinity at the mouth, as well
as the eddy viscosity and diffusion coefficients.
The results of this model used for the Piaaguera channel
(upper reaches of the Santos Channel So Paulo
Brazil), validated with the mean vertical Skill parameter,
are presented in Figure 5, according to Miranda
et al. (2012).
579
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
8
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
0
h
Q
uzdz f uf
A
24
where Qf is the river discharge, and A, h, uf are the crosssection area, the depth, and the fresh water velocity,
respectively.
To achieve the solution, the upper and the lower boundary conditions are the same as in the Hansen and Rattray
analytical model: rNz @u
@z jZZ tW and u|z h 0
For (23), which is a second order ordinary differential
equation, its general solution will be dependent on two
integration constants C1 and C2,
1 g
g
h 2 1 3
2
z z
Z z
r
uz
2 rNz x
rNz x 2
6
C1 z C2
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
25
tW
tW h 1 gZx 2
g
, and C2
h
r h3
rNz 2 Nz
3rNz x
rNz
26
rx
uz
rNz
2
6 2
3
2
g
tW
Zx z h2
z h
Nz
rNz
or in nondimensional depth Z
1
g
uZ
r h3 Z3 3Z2 2
6Nz r x
2
tW h
g
Zx h2 Z2 1
Z 1
Nz
rNz
27
z
jhj,
28
0
uZdZ
1
Qf
uf ;
A
29
3Nz
15 rx
tW
h3
u
2 f
24
r
rgh
gh
640
30
and depends on three quantities: (1) the fresh water velocity, (2) the baroclinic component and (3) the wind stress.
An order of magnitude analysis indicates that the
baroclinic term, associated with the longitudinal density
gradient, is the dominant equivalent to the M. Margules
rule for the slope of an interface in the atmosphere, which
was adapted to oceanographic use by A. Defant in 1929
(quoted in von Arx, 1962, 383).
Combining (28) and (30), the final solution for u u
(Z) is Officer (1976):
gh3
rx 8Z3 9Z2 1
48Nz r
1
3
uf Z2 1
2
4
h
tW 3Z2 4Z 1
rNz
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
uZ
31
651
Secondary circulation
The secondary estuarine circulation is normal to the alongchannel currents and is an integrated component of the
estuarine circulation. Its dynamics have been presented
in several articles since the pioneering works by Okubo
(1973). Taking into account experimental results Dyer
(1977), presented diagrammatic representations of the
mean along-channel currents and the associated secondary
circulation for different estuarine types: salt-wedge (types
A or 4), partially mixed (types B or 2), and well mixed
(types C or 1). The dynamic balance of the secondary
flows was established by taking into account the interaction of the following factors: bottom topography and
channel geometry, lateral stratification of density due to
vertical mixing, and gradient pressure forces, Coriolis
acceleration and centrifugal acceleration (Nunes and
Simpson, 1985).
661
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
712
Summary
Estuaries were formed in a narrow coastal boundary zone
between the sea and land, during the last interglacial
period. This contribution is intended to present some
aspects of estuarine circulation related to: (1) transitional
environments along the coastline that are ultimately
dependent on estuarine dynamics; and (2) investigations
of the processes that have focused on estuarine preservation, water quality, morphology, biodiversity, and fisheries
which are strongly dependent on the dynamic behavior of
estuaries.
Some focus is given to the pioneer research published
in the last half of the twentieth century. Additionally,
experimental and theoretical developments have recently
been published focusing on the following issues: estuary
definition, classification, mixing processes, variability,
and circulation.
Transitional environments along the coastline are ultimately dependent on the dynamics of estuarine systems;
however, they have been strongly affected by human
activities. Some of them have been protected by reserve
status since the eighteenth century. Human impacts and
their effects on estuaries and coasts are important factors
that need to be assessed.
713
Bibliography
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
10
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
Miranda, L. B., Dalle Olle, E., Brgamo, A. L.,. Silva, L. S., and
Andutta, F. P., 2012. Circulation and salt intrusion in the
piaaguera channel, Santos (SP). Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, 60(1), 1123.
Miranda, L. B., Castro, B. M., and Kjerfve, B., 2012. Princpios de
Oceanografia Fsica de Estuarios, 2nd edn. Editora da
Universidade de So Paulo (EDUSP). Coleo Acadmica 42,
426 p.
Nunes, R. A., and Simpson, J. H., 1985. Axial convergence in a
well-mixed estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 20,
637649.
Officer, C. B., 1976. Physical Oceanography of Estuaries (and
Associated Coastal Waters). New York: John Wiley & Sons,
465 p.
Okubo, A., 1970. Oceanic Mixing. Chesapeake Bay Institute. The
Johns Hopkins University. Technical Report 62, 119 + references
(R-1/R-20).
Okubo, A., 1973. Effect of shoreline irregularities on streamwise
dispersion in estuaries and other embayments. Netherlands
Journal of Sea Research, 6, 213224.
Oltman, R. E., 1967. Reconnaissance investigations of the discharge water quality of the Amazon. Atas Simpsio sbre biota
Amaznica. Rio de Janeiro, 3 (Limnologia), pp. 163185.
Perillo, G. M. E., 1995. Definition and geomorphologic classification
of estuaries. In Perillo, G. M. E. (ed.), Geomorphology and Sedimentology of Estuaries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science
BV. Developments in Sedimentology 53, pp. 1747.
Prandle, D., 1985. On salinity regimes and the vertical structure of
residual flows in narrow tidal estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and
Shelf Science, 20, 615633.
Prandle, D., 2009. Estuaries. Dynamics, Mixing, Sedimentation and
Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236 p.
Pritchard, D. W., 1952. Salinity distribution and circulation in the
Chesapeake Bay estuarine system. Journal of Marine Research,
11(2), 106123.
Pritchard, D. W., 1954. A study of salt balance in a coastal plain
estuary. Journal of Marine Research, 13(1), 133144.
Pritchard, D. W., 1955. Estuarine circulation patterns. Proceedings
of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 81(Separate.
No. 717), 111.
Pritchard, D. W., 1956. The dynamic structure of a coastal plain
estuary. Journal of Marine Research, 15(1), 3342.
Pritchard, D. W., 1958. The equations of mass continuity and salt
continuity in estuaries. Journal of Marine Research, 17,
412423.
Pritchard, D. W., and Kent, R. E., 1956. A method for determining
mean longitudinal velocities in a coastal plain estuary. Journal
of Marine Research, 15, 8191.
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
Cross-references
893
Wind-Driven Circulation
894
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
11
UE
low salinity
UR
B
UE
high salinity
Estuarine Circulation, Figure 1 Schematic longitudinal section of an estuary showing the influence of advection ()due to river
discharge UR and tidal currents) and vertical mixing (thin waving lines) in the local salt balance. The thick lines are isohalines. Box
A (upper layer), horizontal advection causes a reduction of salinity, but vertical mixing compensates by replacing the low-salinity
water with underlying high-salinity water. The relative roles of advection and mixing are reversed in Box B (lower layer). Bidirectional
circulation is shown in the vertical profile of the u-velocity component (dashed line) with the depth of no motion, and UE and UE are
upper and lower maxima values shown in this profile. According to Geyer (2010).
1.2
1
u
0.8
Velocity (m/s)
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
10
12
Time (hours)
14
16
12
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
0
0.1
0.2
Depth, Z
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Neap
Spring
1
1.5
0.5
0
0.5
u-Component (m/s)
1.5
0.4
0.2
0
0.2
uComponent (m/s)
0.4
Estuarine Circulation, Figure 4 Eulerian profiles of the u-velocity component at half-hour time intervals at spring (left) and neap tide
(right) in the tropical Caravelas River Estuary (Bahia, Brazil). Note the intratidal and subtidal variabilities (From Andutta, 2011).
Depth, Z
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
Vg
Vdf
Vv
vc
0.8
0.9
1
0.06 0.04 0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
Skill=1
0.8
0.9
0.1
Teory
Observation
1
0.06 0.04 0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
Estuarine Circulation, Figure 5 (a) Theoretical results for each component mode: Vg baroclinic forcing; Vdf river discharge;
Vv wind stress and Vc composite profile, in the Piacaguera channel in the upper reaches of the Santos channel (Sao Paulo Brazil,
using the Hansen and Rattray (1965) analytical model. (b) Experimental versus observational of the u-velocity profile. Skill is the mean
vertical parameter to validate the theoretical simulation (From Miranda et al., 2012).
ESTUARINE CIRCULATION
13
0
0.1
0.2
Depth, Z
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0.05
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
Estuarine Circulation, Figure 6 Theoretical velocity profiles for a partially mixed estuary (tick line the same as in Fig. 5b) and the
unidirectional motion of a well-mixed estuary with ebbing currents (u > 0 thin line).