Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Winnipegs
Water Treatment Program
Agenda
Introduction
History of Winnipegs Water Supply
Councils Decision to Treat Winnipegs Water
Why treat our water?
What have we done so far?
What will the new water treatment plant be
like?
What challenges remain?
Environmental Issues
Organizational Issues
Market Conditions
Schedule
Finances
Risk Management
Questions
History
Winnipeg River
Natalie Lake
Winnipeg
Assiniboine
River
ONTARIO
Pinawa
Deacon Reservoir
Ross
Falcon Lake
Shoal Lake
Watershed
Intake Boundary
Kenora
Main Aqueduct
Red River
SHOAL LAKE
(Indian Bay)
McPhillips Reservoir
and Pumping Station
MANITOBA
Tache
Booster
Station
MINNESOTA
Deacon Reservoir
and Booster Station
MacLean Reservoir
and Pumping Station
Main
Aqueduct
Branch II
exsys2bw
0512_cgs
History
WINNIPEG
SHOAL
LAKE
1100
1100
1000
1000
GROUNDLINE
900
900
800
800
INVERT OF AQUEDUCT
700
700
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
History
History
Perimeter Highway
101
WINNIPEG
City Limits
McPhillips Res.
207
MacLean
Res.
Dugald
15
206
Shoal Lake Aqueduct
(1919)
Wilkes Res.
96 km to
Shoal Lake
100
Cell 1
Cell 2
(1972) (1978)
Cell 3
Cell 4
(1997)
6
History
The GWWD Railway was constructed
between 1913 and 1915
Aqueduct construction was completed in
March, 1919 2500 workers at peak
Since 1919, Winnipeg has enjoyed a high
quality reliable water supply from Shoal
Lake
- minimal treatment (chlorine for
disinfection prior to 1937, and fluoride for
dental protection since 1956)
Recently, fluoride was relocated to Deacon,
and orthophosphate was added for lead
control
Councils Decision
In 1993 Council
Accepted the recommendation to undertake
water
treatment within a ten year time frame
And established a Water Treatment Reserve
Between 1995 and 1999 a comprehensive program
of monitoring, pilot testing and engineering
studies was undertaken
In 2000, Council adopted a recommendation that
Winnipeg proceed with a water treatment program
This decision was supported by public
consultation, public health officials and the opinion
of an expert panel (low risk high consequence)
Specific Objectives
Reduce the risk of a waterborne
disease outbreak caused by
chlorine-resistant microorganisms
Reduce chlorine disinfection byproducts
Meet the Canadian Drinking Water
Quality Guidelines
10
Waterborne Pathogens - Da
Bugs
Chlorine is effective
against bacteria and
viruses
Chlorine is relatively
ineffective against
Giardia and requires
high doses and long
contact times
Chlorine is not effective
against
Cryptosporiduim
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Settling Ponds
Algae and other solid
material will be removed
from the water and put in
the ponds.
The water will be
separated from the solid
material.
The solids will be removed
from the ponds every year
and hauled to Brady Road
Landfill.
We do not expect any
odour from the ponds.
24
25
Environmental Issues
Organizational Issues
Market Conditions
Schedule
Finances
Risk Management
26
Environmental Effects
Assessment
An Environmental Effects Assessment study
of the effects the water treatment plant on
the environment and surrounding community
identified no adverse effects.
The study was voluntary it is not required
by our regulators.
The results were shared with stakeholders
and Manitoba Conservation.
The facility will be a zero discharge
operation - it will not discharge to the
environment.
Two Public Open Houses have been held in
Springfield;
All substantive issues have been addressed.
27
Organizational Issues
This is a large complex project with four
major consulting firms working from
geographically diverse locations
Coordination/communication through
ERoom
Construction Management and Fast
Tracking leads to risks and cultural issues
for City and Consultants
Hiring and training of certified operators in
time for commissioning and start-up (2008
by Council mandate) will be challenging
28
Market Conditions
Many large new projects will be
going to market over the scheduled
construction period
A period of high inflation within the
construction industry is forecast
(time = money)
A shortage of qualified contractors
and personnel is anticipated
We must make this an attractive
project for contractors
29
Schedule
April 2005
Finish preliminary design
and environmental effects
study
Spring 2005 Started building the water
treatment plant
Fall 2008Start testing the plant
End of 2008 Begin operating the plant
30
Construction Activities
Progress to date:
Upcoming Work:
Finances
The original water treatment program
budget was $214 million to build the WTP
and $12.75 million/yr to operate
Council has approved an additional $13.3
million for risk mitigation initiatives and
$2.8 million for shops/staff consolidation
The current rate model will provide about
of $117 Million in cash financing
Once the plant is up and operating,
revenues from water sales are sufficient to
cover operating and debt servicing
without extraordinary increases to water
rates
32
Risk Management
This project conforms to new civic policies
on Risk Management
A two-day Risk Management Workshop was
undertaken, using a specialist consultant
120 risk items were identified by workshop
attendees
These were synthesized into 44 project
issues and 33 design issues by the Risk
Consultant.
Some of the risks are Serious to Critical
Further refinement; mitigation and
monitoring protocols have been developed;
risks are monitored on an ongoing basis and
reviewed at monthly meetings
33
Questions?
34