Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
RANGE
Punctuality
DESCRIPTION
10
0
Commitment to
Instructions
Title Page
10
GOOD:
Many instructions were followed, but there were
some that were not.
FAIR TO POOR:
Some instructions were followed, but there was a
considerable amount of them that were not.
VERY POOR:
Few or no instructions were followed.
10
GOOD:
The title page followed some aspects of the APA
style.
FAIR TO POOR:
The title page barely followed the APA style.
VERY POOR:
The title page did not comply with the APA style.
1
First Keyboarded
Draft
RANGE
20
18
16
14
12
10
10
0
Peer Editing
Evaluation
DESCRIPTION
10
RANGE
Peer Editing
Evaluation
(Continuation)
DESCRIPTION
Writing Room
Final Keyboarded
Draft
Heading
5
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
The topic sentence appeared as the first sentence of
the paragraph, including indention.
The topic sentence showed a main subject and a
controlling idea (paying close attention to the
controlling idea questions).
The topic sentence was clear and focused on one idea
only.
FAIR TO POOR:
The topic sentence did not appear as the first sentence
of the paragraph, and no indention was visible.
The topic sentence showed problems with the main
subject and controlling idea.
The topic sentence was unclear and did not focus on
one idea only.
3
RANGE
DESCRIPTION
Supporting Detail Sentences
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
A minimum of 3 supporting detail sentences
appeared right after the topic sentence.
Each supporting detail sentence was directly
connected to the controlling idea of the topic
sentence.
Transitions were used to make each supporting idea
flow accordingly throughout the entire paragraph.
The repetition of terms was kept to a minimum.
FAIR TO POOR:
Some or all of the supporting detail sentences had
nothing to do with the topic sentence.
Transitions were not used, and they were necessary to
connect each supporting idea.
The repetition of terms was overused.
Concluding Sentence
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
The concluding sentence appeared as the last
sentence of the paragraph.
The concluding sentence showed a direct connection
to the topic sentence without repeating the latters
main subject and controlling idea.
The concluding sentence was clear and demonstrated
that the paragraph had come to an end.
FAIR TO POOR:
The concluding sentence did not appear at the end of
the paragraph.
The concluding sentence did not show a direct
connection to the topic sentence or was simply
missing.
The concluding sentence was unclear and did not
demonstrate that the paragraph had come to an end.
Total Score
RANGE
DESCRIPTION
Grammar, Punctuation, and Spelling
EXCELLENT TO GOOD:
The paragraph showed good use of grammar
conventions, punctuation, and spelling in general.
FAIR TO POOR:
The paragraph showed problems with grammar
conventions, punctuation, and spelling from
beginning to end.
_________/100 COMMENTS:
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________