You are on page 1of 8

Available online at www.sciencedirect.


Long-distance transport of phytohormones through
the plant vascular system
Benoit Lacombe1 and Patrick Achard2
Phytohormones are a group of low abundance molecules that
activate various metabolic and developmental processes in
response to environmental and endogenous signals. Like
animal hormones, plant hormones often have distinct source
and target tissues, hence ensuring long-range communication
at the whole-plant level. Plants rely on various hormone
distribution mechanisms depending on the distance and the
direction of the transport. Here, we highlight the recent findings
on the long-distance movement of plant hormones within the
vasculature, from the physiological role to the molecular
mechanism of the transport.
Biochimie et Physiologie Moleculaire des Plantes, UMR CNRS/INRA/
SupAgro/UM, Institut de Biologie Integrative des Plantes Claude
Grignon, 34060 Montpellier Cedex, France
Institut de biologie moleculaire des plantes, CNRS, Universite de
Strasbourg, 12 rue du General Zimmer, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex,
Corresponding author: Achard, Patrick (

Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

This review comes from a themed issue on Cell biology
Edited by Keiko Sugimoto and Arp Schnittger
1369-5266/# 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Due to their sessile lifestyles, plants cannot escape from
adverse environmental situations such as drought, nutrient deficiency or pathogen attack. To overcome these
limitations, plants have evolved efficient mechanisms to
coordinate their growth and development with everchanging environmental conditions. Like all multicellular
organisms, this coordination requires communication mediated by signal molecules that move between the distal
organs of the plant. For example, root-derived signals
optimize shoot growth and adaptive responses under
dry soil conditions [1]. Studies examining the nature of
these signals revealed that classical phytohormones
such as auxin, abscisic acid, strigolactones, cytokinins,
gibberellins and jasmonates, participate in this long-distance communication system, ensuring spatio-temporal

coordination of organ growth and development. Different

transport pathways orchestrate the translocation of these
molecules throughout the plant. Whereas auxin is essentially distributed in a given direction within tissue via a
unique cell-to-cell transport termed polar auxin transport (recently reviewed in [2]), the plant vascular system
is considered as the main route for long-distance transport
of the other phytohormones. During the last few years,
there has been considerable progress in term of our
understanding of this elaborate long-distance transport
system, including the characterization of hormone transporters (Table 1), using a range of non-invasive pharmacological methods associated with grafting techniques
to visualize hormone transport and distribution. In the
following paragraphs, we review some of the exciting
recent advances in long-distance hormone transport via
the plant vascular system.

The plant vascular system: a conduit for longrange communication

The vascular system plays a crucial role in plants in
providing both a mechanical support for aerial organs
and a conduit for long-distance transport of diverse molecules such as phytohormones [3]. The plant vascular
network is composed of two conductive tissues, xylem
and phloem, which transport molecules in largely opposite directions (Figure 1a). While xylem essentially transports water and nutrients from root to shoot, the phloem
distributes photosynthetic assimilates from source
(leaves) to sink tissues at the root and shoot apices. Xylem
vessels consist of tracheary elements, formed by thickwalled dead cells that connect various organs through the
entire plant body. In contrast, the phloem is composed of
living cells (sieve elements) depleted of most of their
organelles and nucleus, organized in sieve tubes associated with companion cells [3]. The organization of the
vascular system is different depending on the plant organ
[4]. Arabidopsis roots have a central xylem conduit
flanked by two phloem poles (Figure 1c), while stems
contain several vascular bundles consisting of phloem at
the periphery and xylem in the centre (Figure 1b).
In the past decade, our understanding of long-distance
communication system has greatly progressed and analysis of xylem and phloem exudates has provided clear
evidence that plant vascular network plays an essential
role in phytohormone distribution. It is noteworthy, however, that translocation of these molecules into or from
the vasculature also requires a transcellular radial transport, achieved by two different processes depending on
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

2 Cell biology

Table 1
Transporters involved in phytohormone transport and distribution mechanisms discussed in the review. See text for further details.

Transporter family

Molecular function


Amino acid carrier

ABA efflux
ABA influx
ABA efflux
ABA influx
ABA/GA influx
ABA influx
ABA influx
ABA influx
ABA efflux
SL efflux
CK efflux
GA/JA-Ile influx
GA/ABA influx
ACC influx

Spatial expression


Root, hypocotyl, leaf vasculature

Root, leaf, guard cells
Seed, vascular tissues, stem
Seed, vascular tissues, guard cells
Root hypodermis, shoot axillary bud
Root stele, leaf vasculature, anther
Stamen filament, anther, pollen
Root endodermis
Root epidermis, leaf mesophyll


n.d., not determined.

Figure 1







Vascular bundle







Interfascicular region




Influx transporter


Efflux transporter
Phloem stream


Xylem stream

Current Opinion in Plant Biology

Schematic representation of vascular tissue organization in plants. (a) Routes of long-distance transport of phytohormones through the plant
vascular system. Xylem (red) and phloem (blue) translocate phytohormones from root to photosynthetic tissues and from source to sink tissues at
both apices, respectively. Hormone transporters described elsewhere in the article (see Table 1 for further details) are indicated with circles
colored in white for abscisic acid (ABA), blue for strigolactones (SLs), purple for cytokinins (CKs), green for gibberellins (GAs) and yellow for the
ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). The orientation of the transport is indicated by an arrow pointing inside (influx)
or outside (efflux) the circle symbol. (b,c) Schematic representation of stem (b) and root (c) cross-sections showing the organization of the
vascular tissues. The phloem is represented in blue and xylem in red.
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

Long-distance transport plant hormones Lacombe and Achard 3

concentration gradient. Whereas hormones require the

function of active transporters to cross the plasma membrane in the direction against their concentration gradient, the uncharged forms of hormones (which increase at
acidic pH for carboxylated hormones such as ABA, jasmonic acid and gibberellins) can freely diffuse from
higher to lower concentrations (discussed for ABA in
[5]) and be trapped in the cell through ionic trap model
[6]. However, this biophysical model should not blind the
experimental approaches demonstrating that even in
these conditions, transporters are involved (Table 1).

Abscisic acid
Originally discovered in the early 1960s as a growth
inhibitor that accumulates during fruit abscission, abscisic
acid (ABA) is involved in manifold physiological processes, including seed germination, stomatal movement and
responses to environmental stresses [7,8]. In particular,
ABA is considered for long time as a hormonal stress
signal that moves throughout the plant to enhance resistance in distant organs [1]. Under mild drought stress, it is
widely accepted that ABA is accumulated in root tissues,
loaded into the xylem vessels, and transported shootward
by the transpiration stream where it acts on guard cells to
induce stomatal closure [9]. Moreover, recent data added
new levels of complexity to this model. First, guard cells
are autonomous for ABA synthesis in response to changes
in leaf hydration [10]. Secondly, ABA biosynthesis is also
highly induced in the vascular parenchyma cells upon
drought [11,12]. Last, accumulation of ABA content in
roots after long-term water stress largely relies on basipetal transport of ABA from aerial organs [13]. These
observations were confirmed with the ABA-specific optogenetic reporter that allows direct cellular monitoring
of dynamic ABA concentration changes in response to
environmental stresses [14,15]. Hence, further investigations will be crucial to provide clearer insights into
physiological roles of long-distance ABA transport in
response to drought.
At the molecular level, several ABA transporters have
been characterized [5,1620]: four G-type ATP-binding
cassette (ABC) transporters (ABCG25, 30, 31 and 40), four
AIT4, NPF4.5/AIT2 and NPF4.6/AIT1) and a DTX/
Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion (MATE)
transporter (DTX50). Transporter activity studies performed in heterologous systems have shown that
ABCG25, ABCG31 and DTX50 act as ABA efflux transporters, while others function as ABA influx transporters.
Noteworthy, although the expression of most of these
transporters colocalizes to that of ABA biosynthesis genes
around vascular tissues, which is consistent with a function in long-distance ABA transport [5,11,12,1620], their
respective role in both acropetal and basipetal translocation of ABA is far from understood. Moreover, it cannot be

ruled out that some of these transporters are also involved

in more local ABA movements such as in guard cells, as
proposed for NPF4.6/AIT1 [18]. Finally, it should be
noted that the glucose ester conjugated form of ABA
(ABA-GE) has been detected in xylem sap of various
plants and thus suggested to serve as long-distance transport form, but so far, the molecular identity of the carrier
remains to be established [5].

Strigolactones (SLs) are carotenoid-derived molecules
that regulate various developmental responses, adapting
plant architecture to nutrient availability. SLs are exuded
from the roots into the soil to stimulate root colonization
by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, thereby enabling plants
to increase nutrient uptake from the rhizosphere [21].
Furthermore, SLs are transported from root to shoot to
inhibit lateral bud outgrowth [22]. Grafting experiments
showed that SLs are synthesized both in roots and shoots,
and that SL precursors are transported shootward in the
xylem to regulate shoot architecture [2225]. Hence,
whereas wild-type rootstocks are able to restore a wildtype development habit to grafted SL deficient scions,
wild-type shoots grafted on SL deficient rootstocks display a wild-type phenotype, indicating that shoots are
autonomous for SLs [2629]. Recently, it was demonstrated that PLEIOTROPIC DRUG RESISTANCE 1
(PDR1) from petunia, a G-type ABC transporter, has a
key role in releasing SLs from root producing cells, and
from vascular and nodal tissues surrounding axillary buds
[30,31]. PDR1 accumulates in shoot axils and is asymmetrically localized in root hypodermal cells, favoring
both acropetal transport of SLs and mycorrhizal fungi
entry [30,31]. Consistent with its function as a cellular SL
exporter, pdr1 mutants display lateral branching phenotype and they are defective in SL exudation in the soil,
thus resulting in reduced symbiotic associations [31]. To
date, except for its ortholog PDR6 in tobacco [32], no SL
transporters have been reported in other plant species.

Cytokinins (CKs) are a group of mobile adenine derivatives involved in a plethora of biological processes including cell division and differentiation, apical dominance,
leaf senescence, root nodulation and nutrient homeostasis
[33]. Nitrate for example, stimulates the production of
trans-zeatin (tZ)-type CKs in the roots, which are then
translocated to the shoots by the xylem to modulate shoot
development [3439]. By contrast, N6-(D2-isopentenyl)
adenine (iP)-type CKs have been shown to move from
the shoots to the roots through the phloem to adjust
nitrogen acquisition [35,40,41], to regulate root nodulation [42], and to maintain vascular patterning in the root
meristem [43]. Chemical profiling associated with grafting experiments between CK biosynthesis mutants have
further demonstrated that both root-derived and shootderived CKs are respectively able to move acropetally and
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

4 Cell biology

basipetally through the plant vascular system [39,44]. At the

molecular level, previous in vitro work suggested that
members of the purine permease (PUP) [45] and equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) families [46,47]
mediate CK translocation, but their involvement in the
long-distance CK transport in planta is unclear [34]. More
recently, two studies in Arabidopsis revealed that a G-type
ABC transporter, ABCG14, is essential for the long-distance transport of tZ-type CKs from the roots to the shoots
[48,49]. ABCG14 is expressed in stele cells in the root
differentiation zone, overlapping with CK production sites.
At the subcellular level, ABCG14 localizes at the plasma
membrane and likely functions as an efflux transporter
[48]. Loss of ABCG14 expression impairs tZ-type CK
accumulation in xylem sap and causes severe shoot growth
repression, a phenotype that is rescued by application of
exogenous CKs [48,49]. The role of ABCG14 for rootto-shoot translocation of CKs was further demonstrated
through grafting experiments. Whereas wild-type rootstocks are able to rescue the growth of abcg14 mutant scions,
wild-type scions grafted onto abcg14 rootstocks display
similar growth defect than abcg14 mutants [49]. By contrast, the basipetal transport of iP-type CKs is far less
understood and the transporters remain to be identified.

root, suggesting that functionally redundant GA transporters might compensate in the absence of NPF3.1
[59,61]. A second GA transporter, NPF2.10/GTR1,
has been shown to import bioactive GA3 in elongating
stamen filaments [57]. Accordingly, gtr1 mutants are
severely impaired in filament elongation and anther dehiscence, and application of exogenous GAs fully restores
the phenotype to that of the wild-type [57]. Remarkably,
GTR1 is also able to transport jasmonoyl-isoleucine (JAIle) into oocytes, a phytohormone also required for stamen development [57]. The contribution of GTR1 in
GA/JA interplay remains unclear. Last, NPF4.1/AIT3 has
been shown to import bioactive GAs in heterologous
system, but no function has been assigned to it [18].
The significance of GA transport in controlling growth
responses is not well understood, but it is assumed that
GAs provide an important communication system among
organs enabling adaptive growth throughout plant development. Consistent with this hypothesis, the transport of
GAs from photosynthetic source to sink organs has been
implicated in floral transition [62], and in the promotion of
internode elongation and secondary growth of the stem
[55,63], while root-to-shoot transport of GAs in DouglasFir has been shown to influence the timing of spring shoot
growth [64].

Gibberellins (GAs) belong to a large family of diterpenoid
compounds that play essential role throughout plant
development, promoting seed germination, growth and
flowering [50,51]. Although GAs are mostly produced at
the site of action [50], numerous studies demonstrated
the existence of long-distance movements of endogenously made GAs, even though contradictory results were
obtained concerning the mobile form [5255,56]. While
studies in maize showed that bioactive GAs are transported [53], grafting experiments in pea indicated that
non-biologically active GA precursors are the mobile
forms [54]. Recently, micrografting experiments in Arabidopsis between hypocotyls of various GA-deficient
mutants provided clear evidence that the GA precursor
GA12 is the main mobile form, although this study cannot
rule out the possibility that other GAs can move locally in
plants [56]. Furthermore, quantitative analysis of endogenous GAs in xylem and phloem exudates indicated
that GA12 moves through the plant vascular system [56].
This, in turn, indicates that GAs conveyed in vascular
tissues must be translocated to specific tissues that require GAs for growth. Genetics and biochemical studies
allowed the identification of several GA transporters, all
belonging to the NPF family [18,57,58,59]. NPF3.1
encodes a plasma membrane influx transporter involved
in the accumulation of bioactive GAs into the root elongating endodermal cells, consistent with previous studies
showing that the endodermis is the main GA-responsive
tissue in the root [59,60]. Lack of NFP3.1 function in
npf3.1 mutants altered the distribution of fluorescentlylabeled bioactive GA4 in root but not the growth of the
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

Jasmonates (JAs) are lipid-derived molecules (oxylipins)
that control specific developmental processes including
root elongation and fertility, and plant adaption to external challenges such as pathogens, insect herbivores and
wounding [65]. JAs are produced in response to tissue
damage and trigger both local and systemic defense
responses [66,67]. Hence, JAs were proposed to move
and operate at distance from their sites of synthesis.
However, although labeled JA feeding and grafting
experiments performed in Solanaceae were consistent
with long-distance transport of JAs [6870], studies in
Arabidopsis rather suggested the existence of a transmitted wound signal triggering systemic synthesis of JAs [66].
Recently, two studies provided clear evidence for both
wound-activated surface potential change (WASP) signal
and transport of endogenous JAs in plants [71,72]. First,
wounded leaves can communicate their damage status to
undamaged leaves by propagating electrical signals mediated by GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE (GLR) genes
to stimulate distal JA production and signaling [71]. On
the other hand, wounded leaves produce JAs in xylem
contact cells that move radially from cell to cell and then
possibly over long-distance to undamaged tissues through
the plant vascular system [72,73]. Accordingly, micrografting experiments between hypocotyls of Arabidopsis
wild-type and JA-deficient mutants demonstrated the
existence of a basipetal transport of JAs, likely via the
phloem route [67,72]. Cotyledon-to-root translocation
of JA was further confirmed with the use of a fluorescent
JA biosensor [67]. Although JA and JA-Ile (the

Long-distance transport plant hormones Lacombe and Achard 5

biologically active form) are abundant in many cells after

wounding and thus possible candidates for mobile signal,
it remains unclear which form of JA is mobile. Furthermore, except for NPF2.10/GTR1 [57] and few NPF
transporters identified in a modified yeast two-hybrid
system [58], the transporters involved in long-distance
translocation of JAs are still unknown.

Brassinosteroids and ethylene

Whereas long distance transport of the five above-described hormones has some molecular basis, far less
information has been obtained for brassinosteroids
(BRs). Indeed, despite the importance of this class of
steroid hormones for plant growth and their widespread
distribution in the plant, grafting and labeled BR feeding
experiments provided no evidence for long-distance
translocation of BRs [74,75]. By contrast, ethylene is a
gas that can freely diffuse from cell to cell, but also over
long distance through the aerenchyma or large intercellular voids [76]. The ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) is also able to move
from root to shoot through the xylem, when the roots
are exposed to flooding or hypoxia [77,78]. Because ACC
is a non-protein amino acid, the role of amino acid carriers
in ACC transport has been hypothesized [79] and demonstrated recently. LYSINE-HISTINE TRANSPORTER
(LHT1) encodes an amino acid transporter taking part in
the transport of ACC [80,81].

Plants use their vascular system to distribute nutrients
and water throughout the plant body (minerals from root
to shoot and assimilates from shoot to root), but also to
transmit information signals between above-ground and
belowground tissues through the transport of phytohormones. Such long-distance hormone transport has been
thoroughly studied for decades via conventional grafting
and hormone feeding experiments. In the last few years,
the nature of the transmitted molecules has been identified, and may either involve the hormone itself, biosynthetic precursor (e.g. GA12), or conjugated form of the
hormone (e.g. ABA-GE). Furthermore, the molecular
identity of few hormone transporters has been revealed,
and they essentially fall in two protein families, the Gtype ABC and the NPF transporters (Table 1). Up to now,
each identified transporter has been characterized as
either an influx or efflux carrier, but since bidirectional
transporters have been identified in each family [82,83],
the directionality of these hormone transporters should be
Finally, the presence of multisubstrate transporters highlights the next steps in the field. First, structure-function
analysis is needed to understand the molecular basis of
their selectivity: how NPF2.10/GTR1 could transport GA
and JA-Ile? Which amino acids in NPF2.10/GTR1 are
involved in the transport pathway? These questions can

be answered by site directed mutagenesis but also using

structural approaches as done for NPF6.3 [84,85]. Second,
hormone crosstalk is important in many physiological and
developmental processes. Hence, the identification of
multihormone transporters is an important step forward
to understand and decipher these hormonal interconnections: for example, is NPF3.1 involved in GA/ABA antagonism or NPF2.10/GTR1 involved in GA/JA-Ile
crosstalk? Precise transport properties determined for
each substrate alone and in combination will probably
provide the clues to answer these questions.

We apologize to colleagues whose work could not be included owing to
space constraints. BL is financially supported by the Institut National de la
Recherche Agronomique (Projet Departement BAP, BAP2013-33-NITSE),
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-JSV6-002-01-NUTSE &
ANR-14-CE34-0007-01-HONIT) and the Region Languedoc-Roussillon
(Chercheur dAvenir), and PA acknowledges the Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review,
have been highlighted as:
 of special interest
 of outstanding interest

Seo M, Koshiba T: Transport of ABA from the site of

biosynthesis to the site of action. J Plant Res 2011,

2. Adamowski M, Friml J: PIN-dependent auxin transport: action,

regulation, and evolution. Plant Cell 2015, 27:20-32.

This review provides the current knowledge on the cell-to-cell transport of
auxin, a transport which is not discussed in the present article.

Lucas WJ, Groover A, Lichtenberger R, Furuta K, Yadav SR,

Helariutta Y, He XQ, Fukuda H, Kang J, Brady SM et al.: The plant
vascular system: evolution, development and functions.
J Integr Plant Biol 2013, 55:294-388.


De Rybel B, Mahonen AP, Helariutta Y, Weijers D: Plant vascular

development: from early specification to differentiation.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2016, 17:30-40.
This review summarizes current understanding of the plant vascular
development from the embryogenesis to the formation of xylem and
phloem tissues. As the plant vascular system is crucial in plants in
facilitating long-distance transport of phytohormones, this is a timely

Boursiac Y, Leran S, Corratge-Faillie C, Gojon A, Krouk G,

Lacombe B: ABA transport and transporters. Trends Plant Sci
2013, 18:325-333.


Kramer EM: How far can a molecule of weak acid travel in the
apoplasm or xylem? Plant Physiol 2006, 141:1233-1236.


Sreenivasulu N, Harshavardhan VT, Govind G, Seiler C, Kohli A:

Contrapuntal role of ABA: does it mediate stress tolerance
or plant growth retardation under long-term drought stress?
Gene 2012, 506:265-273.


Munemasa S, Hauser F, Park J, Waadt R, Brandt B, Schroeder JI:

Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated control of stomatal
aperture. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2015, 28:154-162.


Wilkinson S, Davies WJ: ABA-based chemical signalling: the coordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant Cell Environ
2002, 25:195-210.

10. Bauer H, Ache P, Lautner S, Fromm J, Hartung W, Al-Rasheid KA,

Sonnewald S, Sonnewald U, Kneitz S, Lachmann N et al.:
The stomatal response to reduced relative humidity
requires guard cell-autonomous ABA synthesis.
Curr Biol 2013, 23:53-57.
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

6 Cell biology

11. Endo A, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Nambara E: Vascular system is a

node of systemic stress responses: competence of the cell to
synthesize abscisic acid and its responsiveness to external
cues. Plant Signal Behav 2008, 3:1138-1140.
12. Endo A, Sawada Y, Takahashi H, Okamoto M, Ikegami K, Koiwai H,
Seo M, Toyomasu T, Mitsuhashi W, Shinozaki K et al.: Drought
induction of Arabidopsis 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase
occurs in vascular parenchyma cells. Plant Physiol 2008,
13. Manzi M, Lado J, Rodrigo MJ, Zacarias L, Arbona V, GomezCadenas A: Root ABA accumulation in long-term waterstressed plants is sustained by hormone transport from aerial
organs. Plant Cell Physiol 2015, 56:2457-2466.
14. Waadt R, Hitomi K, Nishimura N, Hitomi C, Adams SR, Getzoff ED,
 Schroeder JI: FRET-based reporters for the direct visualization
of abscisic acid concentration changes in distribution in
Arabidopsis. Elife 2014, 3:e01739.
This study together with [15] has developed a fluorescent ABA biosensor (ABAleons) based on FRET technology to monitor the spatio-temporal
distribution of ABA in living plant cells. The biosensor is based on
the ABA-mediated interaction between ABA receptors and PP2C-type
15. Jones AM, Danielson JA, Manojkumar SN, Lanquar V,
 Grossmann G, Frommer WB: Abscisic acid dynamics in roots
detected with genetically encoded FRET sensors. Elife 2014,
This study together with [14] has developed a fluorescent ABA biosensor (ABACUS) based on FRET technology to monitor the spatio-temporal
distribution of ABA in living plant cells. The biosensor is based on the
ABA-mediated interaction between ABA receptors and PP2C-type phosphatase.
16. Kang J, Hwang JU, Lee M, Kim YY, Assmann SM, Martinoia E,
Lee Y: PDR-type ABC transporter mediates cellular uptake of
the phytohormone abscisic acid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010,
17. Kuromori T, Miyaji T, Yabuuchi H, Shimizu H, Sugimoto Eriko,
Kamiya A, Moriyama Y, Shinozaki K: ABC transporter AtABCG25
is involved in abscisic acid transport and responses. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:2361-2366.
18. Kanno Y, Hanada A, Chiba Y, Ichikawa T, Nakazawa M, Matsui M,
Koshiba T, Kamiya Y, Seo M: Identification of an abscisic acid
transporter by functional screening using the receptor
complex as a sensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012,
19. Kang J, Yim S, Choi H, Kim A, Lee KP, Lopez-Molina L, Martinoia E,
Lee Y: Abscisic acid transporters cooperate to control seed
germination. Nat Commun 2015, 6:8113.
20. Zhang H, Zhu H, Pan Y, Yu Y, Luan S, Li L: A DTX/MATE-type
transporter facilitates abscisic acid efflux and modulates ABA
sensitivity and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant
2014, 7:1522-1532.
21. Al-Babili S, Bouwmeester HJ: Strigolactones, a novel
carotenoid-derived plant hormone. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2015,
22. Domagalska MA, Leyser O: Signal integration in the control of
shoot branching. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2011, 12:211-221.
23. Kohlen W, Charnikhova T, Liu Q, Bours R, Domagalska MA,
Beguerie S, Verstappen F, Leyser O, Bouwmeester H, RuyterSpira C: Strigolactones are transported through the xylem and
play a key role in shoot architectural response to phosphate
deficiency in nonarbuscular mycorrhizal host Arabidopsis.
Plant Physiol 2011, 155:974-987.
24. Abe S, Sado A, Tanaka K, Kisugi T, Asami K, Ota S, Kim HI,
Yoneyama K, Xie X, Ohnishi T et al.: Carlactone is converted to
carlactonoic acid by MAX1 in Arabidopsis and its methyl ester
can directly interact with AtD14 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A 2014, 111:18084-18089.
25. Seto Y, Yamaguchi S: Strigolactone biosynthesis and
perception. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014, 21:1-6.
26. Sorefan K, Booker J, Haurogne K, Goussot M, Bainbridge K,
Foo E, Chatfield S, Ward S, Beveridge C, Rameau C et al.: MAX4
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

and RMS1 are orthologous dioxygenase-like genes that

regulate shoot branching in Arabidopsis and pea. Genes Dev
2003, 17:1469-1474.
27. Johnson X, Brcich T, Dun EA, Goussot M, Haurogne K,
Beveridge CA, Rameau C: Branching genes are conserved
across species. Genes controlling a novel signal in pea are
coregulated by other long-distance signals. Plant Physiol 2006,
28. Booker J, Auldridge M, Wills S, McCarty D, Klee H, Leyser O:
MAX3/CCD7 is a carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase required
for the synthesis of a novel plant signaling molecule. Curr Biol
2004, 14:1232-1238.
29. Booker J, Sieberer T, Wright W, Williamson L, Willett B,
Stirnberg P, Turnbull C, Srinivasan M, Goddard P, Leyser O: MAX1
encodes a cytochrome P450 family member that acts
downstream of MAX3/4 to produce a carotenoid-derived
branch-inhibiting hormone. Dev Cell 2005, 8:443-449.
30. Sasse J, Simon S, Gubeli C, Liu GW, Cheng X, Friml J,

Bouwmeester H, Martinoia E, Borghi L: Asymmetric localizations
of the ABC transporter PaPDR1 trace paths of directional
strigolactone transport. Curr Biol 2015, 25:647-655.
This study demonstrates that the strigolactone ABC transporter PaPDR1
is apically localized in root-tip cortical cells and outer-laterally localized in
the root hypodermis, playing a key role in SL exudation into the rhizosphere and thus in promoting plantmycorrhizal symbiosis.
31. Kretzschmar T, Kohlen W, Sasse J, Borghi L, Schlegel M,
Bachelier JB, Reinhardt D, Bours R, Bouwmeester HJ, Martinoia E:
A petunia ABC protein controls strigolactone-dependent
symbiotic signalling and branching. Nature 2012, 483:341-344.
32. Xie X, Wang G, Yang L, Cheng T, Gao J, Wu Y, Xia Q: Cloning and
characterization of a novel Nicotiana tabacum ABC
transporter involved in shoot branching. Physiol Plant 2015,
33. Werner T, Schmulling T: Cytokinin action in plant development.
Curr Opin Plant Biol 2009, 12:527-538.
34. Kudo T, Kiba T, Sakakibara H: Metabolism and long-distance
translocation of cytokinins. J Integr Plant Biol 2010, 52:53-60.
35. Kiba T, Kudo T, Kojima M, Sakakibara H: Hormonal control of
nitrogen acquisition: roles of auxin, abscisic acid, and
cytokinin. J Exp Bot 2011, 62:1399-1409.
36. Ruffel S, Poitout A, Krouk G, Coruzzi GM, Lacombe B: Longdistance nitrate signaling displays cytokinin dependent and
independent branches. J Integr Plant Biol 2016, 58:226-229.
37. Ruffel S, Gojon A, Lejay L: Signal interactions in the regulation of
root nitrate uptake. J Exp Bot 2014, 65:5509-5517.
38. Ruffel S, Krouk G, Ristova D, Shasha D, Birnbaum KD, Coruzzi GM:
Nitrogen economics of root foraging: transitive closure of
the nitrate-cytokinin relay and distinct systemic signaling
for N supply vs. demand. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011,
39. Kiba T, Takei K, Kojima M, Sakakibara H: Side-chain
modification of cytokinins controls shoot growth in
Arabidopsis. Dev Cell 2013, 27:452-461.
40. Krouk G: Hormones and nitrate: a two-way connection. Plant
Mol Biol 2016
41. Kiba T, Krapp A: Plant nitrogen acquisition under low
availability: regulation of uptake and root architecture.
Plant Cell Physiol 2016, 57:707-714.
42. Sasaki T, Suzaki T, Soyano T, Kojima M, Sakakibara H,
 Kawaguchi M: Shoot-derived cytokinins sytemically regulate
root nodulation. Nat Commun 2014, 5:4983.
This study performed in Lotus japonicus reports that rhizobial infection
triggers the production of mobile CLE-RS1/2 peptides which activate the
production of shoot-derived cytokinins that translocate to the roots to
supress nodulation. From these findings, the authors propose a mechanism by which legumes control nutritional requirements and energy status.
43. Bishopp A, Lehesranta S, Vaten A, Help H, El-Showk S, Scheres B,
Helariutta K, Mahonen AP, Sakakibara H, Helariutta Y:
Phloem-transported cytokinin regulates polar auxin transport

Long-distance transport plant hormones Lacombe and Achard 7

and maintains vascular pattern in the root meristem. Curr Biol

2011, 21:927-932.
44. Matsumoto-Kitano M, Kusumoto T, Tarkowski P, KinoshitaTsujimura K, Vaclavikova K, Miyawaki K, Kakimoto T: Cytokinins
are central regulators of cambial activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S
A 2008, 105:20027-20031.
45. Burkle L, Cedzich A, Dopke C, Stransky H, Okumoto S, Gillissen B,
Kuhn C, Frommer WB: Transport of cytokinins mediated by
purine transporters of the PUP family expressed in phloem,
hydathodes, and pollen of Arabidopsis. Plant J 2003, 34:13-26.
46. Hirose N, Makita N, Yamaya T, Sakakibara H: Functional
characterization and expression analysis of a gene, OsENT2,
encoding an equilibrative nucleoside transporter in rice
suggest a function in cytokinin transport. Plant Physiol 2005,
47. Sun J, Hirose N, Wang X, Wen P, Xue L, Sakakibara H, Zuo J:
Arabidopsis SOI33/AtENT8 gene encodes a putative
equilibrative nucleoside transporter that is involved in
cytokinin transport in planta. J Integr Plant Biol 2005,
48. Zhang K, Novak O, Wei Z, Gou M, Zhang X, Yu Y, Yang H, Cai Y,
 Strnad M, Liu CJ: Arabidopsis ABCG14 protein controls the
acropetal translocation of root-synthesized cytokinins.
Nat Commun 2014, 5:3274.
Together with [49], this study provides evidence that ABCG14 is
involved in acropetal transport of trans-zeatin (tZ)-type cytokinins. Radiolabeled cytokinin uptake assays suggest that ABCG14, accumulating in
root stele, functions as a trans-zeatin exporter.
49. Ko D, Kang J, Kiba T, Park J, Kojima M, Do J, Kim KY, Kwon M,
 Endler A, Song WY et al.: Arabidopsis ABCG14 is essential for
the root-to-shoot translocation of cytokinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A 2014, 111:7150-7155.
Together with [48], this study provides evidence that ABCG14 is
involved in acropetal transport of trans-zeatin (tZ)-type cytokinins.
abcg14 mutants display severe shoot growth phenotype associated with
reduced tZ-type CKs in xylem sap, which is rescued by grafting abcg14
shoots onto wild-type rootstocks.
50. Hedden P, Thomas SG: Gibberellin biosynthesis and its
regulation. Biochem J 2012, 444:11-25.
51. Pimenta Lange MJ, Lange T: Gibberellin biosynthesis and the
regulation of plant development. Plant Biol 2006, 8:281-290.
52. Kato J: Non-polar transport of gibberellin through pea
stem and a method for its determination. Science 1958,
53. Kastumi M, Foard DE, Phinney RO: Evidence for the
translocation of gibberellin A3 and gibberellin-like substances
in grafts between normal, dwarf1 and dwarf5 seedlings of Zea
mays L.. Plant Cell Physiol 1983, 24:379-388.
54. Proebsting WM, Hedden P, Lewis MJ, Croker SJ, Proebsting LN:
Gibberellin concentration and transport in genetic lines of pea:
effects of grafting. Plant Physiol 1992, 100:1354-1360.
55. Ragni L, Nieminen K, Pacheco-Villalobos D, Sibout R,
Schwechheimer C, Hardtke CS: Mobile gibberellin directly
stimulates Arabidopsis hypocotyl xylem expansion.
Plant Cell 2011, 23:1322-1336.
56. Regnault T, Davie`re J-M, Wild M, Sakvarelidze-Achard L, Heintz D,
 Carrera Bergua E, Lopez DIaz I, Gong F, Hedden P, Achard P: The
gibberellin precursor GA12 acts as a long-distance growth
signal in Arabidopsis. Nat Plants 2015, 1:15073.
Using a large collection of Arabidopsis GA biosynthesis mutants, the
authors provides important evidence, by combining micrografting and
biochemical apporaches, that endogenous GA12 is the major mobile GA
signal over long distance.
57. Saito H, Oikawa T, Hamamoto S, Ishimaru Y, Kanamori-Sato M,

Sasaki-Sekimoto Y, Utsumi T, Chen J, Kanno Y, Masuda S et al.:
The jasmonate-responsive GTR1 transporter is required for
gibberellin-mediated stamen development in Arabidopsis.
Nat Commun 2015, 6:6095.
This study demonstrates that GTR1/NPF2.10 is a multifunctional carrier
that transports various substrates including glucosinolates, JA-Ile and
GA3. The authors propose that GTR1 has an important role in supplying
GA for stamen development, a process which is also regulated by JA.

58. Chiba Y, Shimizu T, Miyakawa S, Kanno Y, Koshiba T, Kamiya Y,

Seo M: Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana NRT1/PTR
FAMILY (NPF) proteins capable of transporting plant
hormones. J Plant Res 2015, 18:679-686.
59. Tal I, Zhang Y, Jorgensen ME, Pisanty O, Barbosa IC,
 Zourelidou M, Regnault T, Crocoll C, Olsen E, Weinstein R et al.:
The Arabidopsis NPF3 protein is a GA transporter.
Nat Commun 2016, 7:11486.
Taking advantage of a fluorescently labelled GA to screen for Arabidopsis
mutants deficient in GA transport, the authors show that NPF3 is a GA
transporter localized in root endodermis, the main GA-responsive tissue
in the root. Interestingly, hormone uptake assays reveal that NPF3 acts as
an influx carrier of both GA and ABA, opening a new field of investigation
into GAABA interplay.
60. Ubeda-Tomas S, Swarup R, Coates J, Swarup K, Laplaze L,
Beemster GT, Hedden P, Bhalerao R, Bennett MJ: Root growth in
Arabidopsis requires gibberellin/DELLA signalling in the
endodermis. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:625-628.
61. Shani E, Weinstain R, Zhang Y, Castillejo C, Kaiserli E, Chory J,
Tsien RY, Estelle M: Gibberellins accumulate in the elongating
endodermal cells of Arabidopsis root. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
2013, 110:4834-4839.
62. Eriksson S, Bohlenius H, Moritz T, Nilsson O: GA4 is the active
gibberellin in the regulation of LEAFY transcription and
Arabidopsis floral initiation. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2172-2181.
63. Dayan J, Voronin N, Gong F, Sun TP, Hedden P, Fromm H, Aloni R:
Leaf-induced gibberellin signaling is essential for internode
elongation, cambial activity, and fiber differentiation in
tobacco stems. Plant Cell 2012, 24:66-79.
64. Lavender DP, Sweet GB, Zaerr JB, Hermann RK: Spring shoot
growth in douglas-fir may be initiated by gibberellins exported
from the roots. Science 1973, 182:838-839.
65. Wasternack C, Hause B: Jasmonates: biosynthesis, perception,
signal transduction and action in plant stress response,
growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in
Annals of Botany. Ann Bot 2013, 111:1021-1058.
66. Koo AJ, Howe GA: The wound hormone jasmonate.
Phytochemistry 2009, 70:1571-1580.
67. Larrieu A, Champion A, Legrand J, Lavenus J, Mast D, Brunoud G,
 Oh J, Guyomarch S, Pizot M, Farmer EE et al.: A fluorescent
hormone biosensor reveals the dynamics of jasmonate
signalling in plants. Nat Commun 2015, 6:6043.
This study describes a novel JA biosensor (Jas9-Venus) based on JAmediated JAZ protein turnover, and demonstrates its high spatio-temporal sensitivity in response to wounding.
68. Li L, Li C, Lee GI, Howe GA: Distinct roles for jasmonate
synthesis and action in the systemic wound response of
tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:6416-6421.
69. Thorpe MR, Ferrieri AP, Herth MM, Ferrieri RA: 11C-imaging:
methyl jasmonate moves in both phloem and xylem, promotes
transport of jasmonate, and of photoassimilate even after
proton transport is decoupled. Planta 2007, 226:541-551.
70. Sato C, Aikawa K, Sugiyama S, Nabeta K, Masuta C, Matsuura H:
Distal transport of exogenously applied jasmonoyl-isoleucine
with wounding stress. Plant Cell Physiol 2011, 52:509-517.
71. Mousavi SA, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE:
GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE genes mediate leaf-to-leaf
wound signalling. Nature 2013, 500:422-426.
72. Gasperini D, Chauvin A, Acosta IF, Kurenda A, Stolz S, Chetelat A,
 Wolfender JL, Farmer EE: Axial and radial oxylipin transport.
Plant Physiol 2015, 169:2244-2254.
This study elegantly shows by grafting experiments that endogenous JAs
translocate from wounded shoots to unwounded roots. Furthermore,
radial cell-to-cell transport of JAs is observed in wounded leaves.
73. Chauvin A, Caldelari D, Wolfender JL, Farmer EE: Four 13lipoxygenases contribute to rapid jasmonate synthesis in
wounded Arabidopsis thaliana leaves: a role for lipoxygenase
6 in responses to long-distance wound signals. New Phytol
2013, 197:566-575.
Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

8 Cell biology

74. Symons GM, Reid JB: Brassinosteroids do not undergo longdistance transport in pea. Implications for the regulation of
endogenous brassinosteroid levels. Plant Physiol 2004,
75. Symons GM, Ross JJ, Jager CE, Reid JB: Brassinosteroid
transport. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:17-24.
76. Van de Poel B, Van Der Straeten D: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1carboxylic acid (ACC) in plants: more than just the precursor of
ethylene! Front Plant Sci 2014, 5:640.
77. Bradford KJ, Yang SF: Stress-induced ethylene production
in the ethylene-requiring tomato mutant diageotropica.
Plant Physiol 1980, 65:327-330.
78. Bradford KJ, Yang SF: Xylem transport of 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, an ethylene precursor,
in waterlogged tomato plants. Plant Physiol 1980, 65:322-326.
79. Lurssen K: Interference of amino acids with the uptake of 1aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid in soybean leaf discs.
Plant Sci Lett 1981, 20:365-370.
80. Shin K, Lee S, Song WY, Lee RA, Lee I, Ha K, Koo JC, Park SK,
Nam HG, Lee Y et al.: Genetic identification of

Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2016, 34:18

ACC-RESISTANT2 reveals involvement of LYSINE HISTIDINE

TRANSPORTER1 in the uptake of 1-aminocyclopropane-1carboxylic acid in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 2015,
81. Hirner A, Ladwig F, Stransky H, Okumoto S, Keinath M, Harms A,
Frommer WB, Koch W: Arabidopsis LHT1 is a high-affinity
transporter for cellular amino acid uptake in both root
epidermis and leaf mesophyll. Plant Cell 2006, 18:1931-1946.
82. Leran S, Munos S, Brachet C, Tillard P, Gojon A, Lacombe B:
Arabidopsis NRT1.1 is a bidirectional transporter involved
in root-to-shoot nitrate translocation. Mol Plant 2013,
83. Kang J, Park J, Choi H, Burla B, Kretzschmar T, Lee Y, Martinoia E:
Plant ABC transporters. Arabidopsis Book 2011, 9:e0153.
84. Parker JL, Newstead S: Molecular basis of nitrate uptake
by the plant nitrate transporter NRT1.1. Nature 2014,
85. Sun J, Bankston JR, Payandeh J, Hinds TR, Zagotta WN, Zheng N:
Crystal structure of the plant dual-affinity nitrate transporter
NRT1.1. Nature 2014, 507:73-77.